Structure and function in the uracil-DNA glycosylase superfamily

Deamination of cytosine to uracil is one of the major pro-mutagenic events in DNA, causing G:C-->A:T transition mutations if not repaired before replication. Repair of uracil-DNA is achieved in a base-excision pathway initiated by a uracil-DNA glycosylase (UDG) enzyme of which four families have so far been identified. Family-1 enzymes are active against uracil in ssDNA and dsDNA, and recognise uracil explicitly in an extrahelical conformation via a combination of protein and bound-water interactions. Extrahelical recognition requires an efficient process of substrate location by 'base-sampling' probably by hopping or gliding along the DNA. Family-2 enzymes are mismatch specific and explicitly recognise the widowed guanine on the complementary strand rather than the extrahelical scissile pyrimidine. This allows a broader specificity so that some Family-2 enzymes can excise uracil and 3, N(4)-ethenocytosine from mismatches with guanine. Although structures are not yet available for Family-3 (SMUG) and Family-4 enzymes, sequence analysis suggests similar overall folds, and identifies common active site motifs but with a surprising lack of conservation of catalytic residues between members of the super-family.     

DNA base excision repair of uracil residues in reconstituted nucleosome core particles

The human base excision repair machinery must locate and repair DNA base damage present in chromatin, of which the nucleosome core particle is the basic repeating unit. Here, we have utilized fragments of the Lytechinus variegatus 5S rRNA gene containing site-specific U:A base pairs to investigate the base excision repair pathway in reconstituted nucleosome core particles in vitro. The human uracil-DNA glycosylases, UNG2 and SMUG1, were able to remove uracil from nucleosomes. Efficiency of uracil excision from nucleosomes was reduced 3- to 9-fold when compared with naked DNA, and was essentially uniform along the length of the DNA substrate irrespective of rotational position on the core particle. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the excision repair pathway of an abasic site can be reconstituted on core particles using the known repair enzymes, AP-endonuclease 1, DNA polymerase beta and DNA ligase III. Thus, base excision repair can proceed in nucleosome core particles in vitro, but the repair efficiency is limited by the reduced activity of the uracil-DNA glycosylases and DNA polymerase beta on nucleosome cores.     

Uracil-DNA glycosylase in base excision repair and adaptive immunity: species differences between man and mouse

Genomic uracil is a DNA lesion but also an essential key intermediate in adaptive immunity. In B cells, activation-induced cytidine deaminase deaminates cytosine to uracil (U:G mispairs) in Ig genes to initiate antibody maturation. Uracil-DNA glycosylases (UDGs) such as uracil N-glycosylase (UNG), single strand-selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase 1 (SMUG1), and thymine-DNA glycosylase remove uracil from DNA. Gene-targeted mouse models are extensively used to investigate the role of these enzymes in DNA repair and Ig diversification. However, possible species differences in uracil processing in humans and mice are yet not established. To address this, we analyzed UDG activities and quantities in human and mouse cell lines and in splenic B cells from Ung(+/+) and Ung(-/-) backcrossed mice. Interestingly, human cells displayed ～15-fold higher total uracil excision capacity due to higher levels of UNG. In contrast, SMUG1 activity was ～8-fold higher in mouse cells, constituting ～50% of the total U:G excision activity compared with less than 1% in human cells. In activated B cells, both UNG and SMUG1 activities were at levels comparable with those measured for mouse cell lines. Moreover, SMUG1 activity per cell was not down-regulated after activation. We therefore suggest that SMUG1 may work as a weak backup activity for UNG2 during class switch recombination in Ung(-/-) mice. Our results reveal significant species differences in genomic uracil processing. These findings should be taken into account when mouse models are used in studies of uracil DNA repair and adaptive immunity.     

hSMUG1 can functionally compensate for Ung1 in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

There are at least four distinct families of enzymes that recognize and remove uracil from DNA. Family-3 (SMUG1) enzymes have recently been identified and have a preference for uracil in single-stranded DNA when assayed in vitro. Here we investigate the in vivo function of SMUG1 using the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system. These organisms lack a SMUG1 homologue and use a single enzyme, Ung1 to carry out uracil-repair. When a wild-type strain is treated with antifolate agents to induce uracil misincorporation into DNA, S-phase arrest and cellular toxicity occurs. The arrest is characteristic of checkpoint activation due to single-strand breaks caused by continuous uracil removal and self-defeating DNA repair. When uracil-DNA glycosylase is deleted (deltaung1), cells continue through S-phase and arrest at G(2)/M, presumably due to the effects of stable uracil misincorporation in DNA. Pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) demonstrates that cells are able to complete DNA replication with uracil-substituted DNA and do not experience the extensive strand breakage attributed to uracil-DNA glycosylase-mediated repair. As a result, these cells experience early protection from antifolate-induced cytotoxicity. When either UNG1 or SMUG1 functions are reintroduced back into the null strain and then subjected to antifolate treatment, the cells revert back to the wild-type phenotype as shown by a restored sensitivity to drug and S-phase arrest. The arrest is accompanied by the accumulation of replication intermediates as determined by PFGE. Collectively, these data indicate that SMUG1 can act as a functional homolog of the family-1 uracil-DNA glycosylase enzymes.     

Structure and specificity of the vertebrate anti-mutator uracil-DNA glycosylase SMUG1

Cytosine deamination is a major promutagenic process, generating G:U mismatches that can cause transition mutations if not repaired. Uracil is also introduced into DNA via nonmutagenic incorporation of dUTP during replication. In bacteria, uracil is excised by uracil-DNA glycosylases (UDG) related to E. coli UNG, and UNG homologs are found in mammals and viruses. Ung knockout mice display no increase in mutation frequency due to a second UDG activity, SMUG1, which is specialized for antimutational uracil excision in mammalian cells. Remarkably, SMUG1 also excises the oxidation-damage product 5-hydroxymethyluracil (HmU), but like UNG is inactive against thymine (5-methyluracil), a chemical substructure of HmU. We have solved the crystal structure of SMUG1 complexed with DNA and base-excision products. This structure indicates a more invasive interaction with dsDNA than observed with other UDGs and reveals an elegant water displacement/replacement mechanism that allows SMUG1 to exclude thymine from its active site while accepting HmU.     

Excision of uracil residues in DNA: mechanism of action of Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus uracil-DNA glycosylases.

Various octadeoxynucleotides containing uracil at different positions were synthesized and submitted to the action of Escherichia coli and Micrococcus luteus uracil-DNA glycosylases. A uracil residue situated at the 5'-end was excised by the M.luteus enzyme but not by the E.coli one. Uracil residues located at the ultimate and penultimate positions at the 3'-end were not cleaved by either enzymes. At the other central positions, uracil was eliminated with different initial velocities. Single stranded phi X 174 DNA fragments were used to study the influence of the sequence. Cytosine bases were deaminated to give uracil by bisulfite treatment. It was shown that the initial excision velocity of two vicinal uracil residues was decreased. The same observation was made for two uracils separated by one base. A hypothetical scheme is suggested to explain the mechanism of action of uracil-DNA glycosylases.     

Molecular cloning of human uracil-DNA glycosylase, a highly conserved DNA repair enzyme.

Uracil-DNA glycosylase is the DNA repair enzyme responsible for the removal of uracil from DNA, and it is present in all organisms investigated. Here we report on the cloning and sequencing of a cDNA encoding the human uracil-DNA glycosylase. The sequences of uracil-DNA glycosylases from yeast, Escherichia coli, herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2, and homologous genes from varicella-zoster and Epstein-Barr viruses are known. It is shown in this report that the predicted amino acid sequence of the human uracil-DNA glycosylase shows a striking similarity to the other uracil-DNA glycosylases, ranging from 40.3 to 55.7% identical residues. The proteins of human and bacterial origin were unexpectedly found to be most closely related, 73.3% similarity when conservative amino acid substitutions were included. The similarity between the different uracil-DNA glycosylase genes is confined to several discrete boxes. These findings strongly indicate that uracil-DNA glycosylases from phylogenetically distant species are highly conserved.     

AID expression in B-cell lymphomas causes accumulation of genomic uracil and a distinct AID mutational signature

The most common mutations in cancer are C to T transitions, but their origin has remained elusive. Recently, mutational signatures of APOBEC-family cytosine deaminases were identified in many common cancers, suggesting off-target deamination of cytosine to uracil as a common mutagenic mechanism. Here we present evidence from mass spectrometric quantitation of deoxyuridine in DNA that shows significantly higher genomic uracil content in B-cell lymphoma cell lines compared to non-lymphoma cancer cell lines and normal circulating lymphocytes. The genomic uracil levels were highly correlated with AID mRNA and protein expression, but not with expression of other APOBECs. Accordingly, AID knockdown significantly reduced genomic uracil content. B-cells stimulated to express endogenous AID and undergo class switch recombination displayed a several-fold increase in total genomic uracil, indicating that B cells may undergo widespread cytosine deamination after stimulation. In line with this, we found that clustered mutations (kataegis) in lymphoma and chronic lymphocytic leukemia predominantly carry AID-hotspot mutational signatures. Moreover, we observed an inverse correlation of genomic uracil with uracil excision activity and expression of the uracil-DNA glycosylases UNG and SMUG1. In conclusion, AID-induced mutagenic U:G mismatches in DNA may be a fundamental and common cause of mutations in B-cell malignancies.     

Strikingly different properties of uracil-DNA glycosylases UNG2 and SMUG1 may explain divergent roles in processing of genomic uracil

Genomic uracil resulting from spontaneously deaminated cytosine generates mutagenic U:G mismatches that are usually corrected by error-free base excision repair (BER). However, in B-cells, activation-induced cytosine deaminase (AID) generates U:G mismatches in hot-spot sequences at Ig loci. These are subject to mutagenic processing during somatic hypermutation (SHM) and class switch recombination (CSR). Uracil N-glycosylases UNG2 and SMUG1 (single strand-selective monofunctional uracil-DNA glycosylase 1) initiate error-free BER in most DNA contexts, but UNG2 is also involved in mutagenic processing of AID-induced uracil during the antibody diversification process, the regulation of which is not understood. AID is strictly single strand-specific. Here we show that in the presence of Mg2+ and monovalent salts, human and mouse SMUG1 are essentially double strand-specific, whereas UNG2 efficiently removes uracil from both single and double stranded DNA under all tested conditions. Furthermore, SMUG1 and UNG2 display widely different sequence preferences. Interestingly, uracil in a hot-spot sequence for AID is 200-fold more efficiently removed from single stranded DNA by UNG2 than by SMUG1. This may explain why SMUG1, which is not excluded from Ig loci, is unable to replace UNG2 in antibody diversification. We suggest a model for mutagenic processing in which replication protein A (RPA) recruits UNG2 to sites of deamination and keeps DNA in a single stranded conformation, thus avoiding error-free BER of the deaminated cytosine.     

DNA glycosylase recognition and catalysis

DNA glycosylases are the enzymes responsible for recognizing base lesions in the genome and initiating base excision DNA repair. Recent structural and biochemical results have provided novel insights into DNA damage recognition and repair. The basis of the recognition of the oxidative lesion 8-oxoguanine by two structurally unrelated DNA glycosylases is now understood and has been revealed to involve surprisingly similar strategies. Work on MutM (Fpg) has produced structures representing three discrete reaction steps. The NMR structure of 3-methyladenine glycosylase I revealed its place among the structural families of DNA glycosylases and the X-ray structure of SMUG1 likewise confirmed that this protein is a member of the uracil DNA glycosylase superfamily. A novel disulfide cross-linking strategy was used to obtain the long-anticipated structure of MutY bound to DNA containing an A*oxoG mispair.     

Multiple uracil-DNA glycosylase activities in Deinococcus radiodurans

The extremely radiation resistant bacterium, Deinococcus radiodurans, contains a spectrum of genes that encode for multiple activities that repair DNA damage. We have cloned and expressed the product of three predicted uracil-DNA glycosylases to determine their biochemical function. DR0689 is a homologue of the Escherichia coli uracil-DNA glycosylase, the product of the ung gene; this activity is able to remove uracil from a U : G and U : A base pair in double-stranded DNA and uracil from single-stranded DNA and is inhibited by the Ugi peptide. DR1751 is a member of the class 4 family of uracil-DNA glycosylases such as those found in the thermophiles Thermotoga maritima and Archaeoglobus fulgidus. DR1751 is also able to remove uracil from a U : G and U : A base pair; however, it is considerably more active on single-stranded DNA. Unlike its thermophilic relatives, the enzyme is not heat stable. Another putative enzyme, DR0022, did not demonstrate any appreciable uracil-DNA glycosylase activity. DR0689 appears to be the major activity in the organism based on inhibition studies with D. radiodurans crude cell extracts utilizing the Ugi peptide. The implications for D. radiodurans having multiple uracil-DNA glycosylase activities and other possible roles for these enzymes are discussed.     

SMUG1 is able to excise uracil from immunoglobulin genes: insight into mutation versus repair

Mammals harbour multiple enzymes capable of excising uracil from DNA, although their distinct physiological roles remain uncertain. One of them (UNG) plays a critical role in antibody gene diversification, as UNG deficiency alone is sufficient to perturb the process. Here, we show this unique requirement for UNG does not reflect the fact that other glycosylases are unable to access the U:G lesion. SMUG1, if overexpressed, can partially substitute for UNG to assist antibody diversification as judged by its effect on somatic hypermutation patterns (in both DT40 B cells and mice) as well as a restoration of isotype switching in SMUG-transgenic msh2-/- ung-/- mice. However, SMUG1 plays little natural role in antibody diversification because (i) it is diminishingly expressed during B-cell activation and (ii) even if overexpressed, SMUG1 more appears to favour conventional repair of the uracil lesion than assist diversification. The distinction between UNG and overexpressed SMUG1 regarding the balance between antibody diversification and non-mutagenic repair of the U:G lesion could reflect the association of UNG (but not SMUG1) with sites of DNA replication.     

Trypanosoma cruzi contains a single detectable uracil-DNA glycosylase and repairs uracil exclusively via short patch base excision repair

Enzymes involved in genomic maintenance of human parasites are attractive targets for parasite-specific drugs. The parasitic protozoan Trypanosoma cruzi contains at least two enzymes involved in the protection against potentially mutagenic uracil, a deoxyuridine triphosphate nucleotidohydrolase (dUTPase) and a uracil-DNA glycosylase belonging to the highly conserved UNG-family. Uracil-DNA glycosylase activities excise uracil from DNA and initiate a multistep base-excision repair (BER) pathway to restore the correct nucleotide sequence. Here we report the biochemical characterisation of T.cruzi UNG (TcUNG) and its contribution to the total uracil repair activity in T.cruzi. TcUNG is shown to be the major uracil-DNA glycosylase in T.cruzi. The purified recombinant TcUNG exhibits substrate preference for removal of uracil in the order ssU>U:G>U:A, and has no associated thymine-DNA glycosylase activity. T.cruzi apparently repairs U:G DNA substrate exclusively via short-patch BER, but the DNA polymerase involved surprisingly displays a vertebrate POLdelta-like pattern of inhibition. Back-up UDG activities such as SMUG, TDG and MBD4 were not found, underlying the importance of the TcUNG enzyme in protection against uracil in DNA and as a potential target for drug therapy.     

Uracil in Ori<Subscript>s</Subscript> of herpes simplex 1 alters its specific recognition by origin binding protein (OBP): does virus induced uracil-DNA glycosylase play a key role in viral reactivation and replication?

We have recently demonstrated that mammalian uracil-DNA glycosylase activity is undetectable in adult neurons. On the basis of this finding we hypothesized that uracil, derived either from oxidative deamination of cytosine or misincorporation of dUMP in place of dTMP during DNA repair by the unique nuclear DNA polymerase present in adult neurons, DNA polymerase β, might accumulate in neuronal DNA. Uracil residues could also arise in the herpes simplex 1 (HSV1) genome during latency in nerve cells. We therefore suggest a role for the virus encoded uracil-DNA glycosylase in HSV1 reactivation and in the first steps of DNA replication. We show here 1) that the viral DNA polymerase incorporates dUTP in place of dTTP with a comparable efficiencyin vitro; 2) that virus specific DNA/protein interactions between the virus encoded origin binding protein and its target DNA sequence is altered by the presence of uracil residues in its central region TCGCA. Thus uracil, present in viral Ori_S or other key sequences could hamper the process leading to viral reactivation. Hence, HSV1 uracil-DNA glycosylase, dispensable in viral proliferation in tissue culture, could be essential in neurons for the “cleansing” of the viral genome of uracil residues before the start of replication.     

A mollicute (mycoplasma) DNA repair enzyme: purification and characterization of uracil-DNA glycosylase.

The DNA repair enzyme uracil-DNA glycosylase from Mycoplasma lactucae (831-C4) was purified 1,657-fold by using affinity chromatography and chromatofocusing techniques. The only substrate for the enzyme was DNA that contained uracil residues, and the Km of the enzyme was 1.05 +/- 0.12 microM for dUMP containing DNA. The product of the reaction was uracil, and it acted as a noncompetitive inhibitor of the uracil-DNA glycosylase with a Ki of 5.2 mM. The activity of the enzyme was insensitive to Mg2+, Mn2+, Zn2+, Ca2+, and Co2+ over the concentration range tested, and the activity was not inhibited by EDTA. The enzyme activity exhibited a biphasic response to monovalent cations and to polyamines. The enzyme had a pI of 6.4 and existed as a nonspherical monomeric protein with a molecular weight of 28,500 +/- 1,200. The uracil-DNA glycosylase from M. lactucae was inhibited by the uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor from bacteriophage PBS-2, but the amount of inhibitor required for 50% inhibition of the mycoplasmal enzyme was 2.2 and 8 times greater than that required to cause 50% inhibition of the uracil-DNA glycosylases from Escherichia coli and Bacillus subtilis, respectively. Previous studies have reported that some mollicutes lack uracil-DNA glycosylase activity, and the results of this study demonstrate that the uracil-DNA glycosylase from M. lactucae has a higher Km for uracil-containing DNA than those of the glycosylases of other procaryotic organisms. Thus, the low G + C content of the DNA from some mollicutes and the A.T-biased mutation pressure observed in these organisms may be related to their decreased capacity to remove uracil residues from DNA.     

Germline ablation of SMUG1 DNA glycosylase causes loss of 5-hydroxymethyluracil- and UNG-backup uracil-excision activities and increases cancer predisposition of Ung-/-Msh2-/- mice

Deamination of cytosine (C), 5-methylcytosine (mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (hmC) occurs spontaneously in mammalian DNA with several hundred deaminations occurring in each cell every day. The resulting potentially mutagenic mispairs of uracil (U), thymine (T) or 5-hydroxymethyluracil (hmU) with guanine (G) are substrates for repair by various DNA glycosylases. Here, we show that targeted inactivation of the mouse Smug1 DNA glycosylase gene is sufficient to ablate nearly all hmU-DNA excision activity as judged by assay of tissue extracts from knockout mice as well as by the resistance of their embryo fibroblasts to 5-hydroxymethyldeoxyuridine toxicity. Inactivation of Smug1 when combined with inactivation of the Ung uracil-DNA glycosylase gene leads to a loss of nearly all detectable uracil excision activity. Thus, SMUG1 is the dominant glycosylase responsible for hmU-excision in mice as well as the major UNG-backup for U-excision. Both Smug1-knockout and Smug1/Ung-double knockout mice breed normally and remain apparently healthy beyond 1 year of age. However, combined deficiency in SMUG1 and UNG exacerbates the cancer predisposition of Msh2(-/-) mice suggesting that when both base excision and mismatch repair pathways are defective, the mutagenic effects of spontaneous cytosine deamination are sufficient to increase cancer incidence but do not preclude mouse development.     

Enzymology of base excision repair in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum

DNA of all living organisms is constantly modified by exogenous and endogenous reagents. The mutagenic threat of modifications such as methylation, oxidation, and hydrolytic deamination of DNA bases is counteracted by base excision repair (BER). This process is initiated by the action of one of several DNA glycosylases, which removes the aberrant base and thus initiates a cascade of events that involves scission of the DNA backbone, removal of the baseless sugar-phosphate residue, filling in of the resulting single nucleotide gap, and ligation of the remaining nick. We were interested to find out how the BER process functions in hyperthermophiles, organisms growing at temperatures around 100 degrees C, where the rates of these spontaneous reactions are greatly accelerated. In our previous studies, we could show that the crenarchaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum has at least three uracil-DNA glycosylases, Pa-UDGa, Pa-UDGb, and Pa-MIG, that can initiate the BER process by catalyzing the removal of uracil residues arising through the spontaneous deamination of cytosines. We now report that the genome of P. aerophilum encodes also the remaining functions necessary for BER and show that a system consisting of four P. aerophilum encoded enzymes, Pa-UDGb, AP endonuclease IV, DNA polymerase B2, and DNA ligase, can efficiently repair a G.U mispair in an oligonucleotide substrate to a G.C pair. Interestingly, the efficiency of the in vitro repair reaction was stimulated by Pa-PCNA1, the processivity clamp of DNA polymerases.     

Biochemical characterization of uracil processing activities in the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum

Deamination of cytosine to uracil and 5-methylcytosine to thymine represents a major mutagenic threat particularly at high temperatures. In double-stranded DNA, these spontaneous hydrolytic reactions give rise to G.U and G.T mispairs, respectively, that must be restored to G.C pairs prior to the next round of DNA replication; if left unrepaired, 50% of progeny DNA would acquire G.C --> A.T transition mutations. The genome of the hyperthermophilic archaeon Pyrobaculum aerophilum has been recently shown to encode a protein, Pa-MIG, a member of the endonuclease III family, capable of processing both G.U and G.T mispairs. We now show that this latter activity is undetectable in crude extracts of P. aerophilum. However, uracil residues in G.U mispairs, in A.U pairs, and in single-stranded DNA were efficiently removed in these extracts. These activities were assigned to a approximately 22-kDa polypeptide named Pa-UDG (P. aerophilum uracil-DNA glycosylase). The recombinant Pa-UDG protein is highly thermostable and displays a considerable degree of homology to the recently described uracil-DNA glycosylases from Archaeoglobus fulgidus and Thermotoga maritima. Interestingly, neither Pa-MIG nor Pa-UDG was inhibited by UGI, a generic inhibitor of the UNG family of uracil glycosylases. Yet a small fraction of the total uracil processing activity present in crude extracts of P. aerophilum was inhibited by this peptide. This implies that the hyperthermophilic archaeon possesses at least a three-pronged defense against the mutagenic threat of hydrolytic deamination of cytosines in its genomic DNA.     

Uracil-DNA glycosylases SMUG1 and UNG2 coordinate the initial steps of base excision repair by distinct mechanisms

DNA glycosylases UNG and SMUG1 excise uracil from DNA and belong to the same protein superfamily. Vertebrates contain both SMUG1 and UNG, but their distinct roles in base excision repair (BER) of deaminated cytosine (U:G) are still not fully defined. Here we have examined the ability of human SMUG1 and UNG2 (nuclear UNG) to initiate and coordinate repair of U:G mismatches. When expressed in Escherichia coli cells, human UNG2 initiates complete repair of deaminated cytosine, while SMUG1 inhibits cell proliferation. In vitro, we show that SMUG1 binds tightly to AP-sites and inhibits AP-site cleavage by AP-endonucleases. Furthermore, a specific motif important for the AP-site product binding has been identified. Mutations in this motif increase catalytic turnover due to reduced product binding. In contrast, the highly efficient UNG2 lacks product-binding capacity and stimulates AP-site cleavage by APE1, facilitating the two first steps in BER. In summary, this work reveals that SMUG1 and UNG2 coordinate the initial steps of BER by distinct mechanisms. UNG2 is apparently adapted to rapid and highly coordinated repair of uracil (U:G and U:A) in replicating DNA, while the less efficient SMUG1 may be more important in repair of deaminated cytosine (U:G) in non-replicating chromatin.