Identification and assignment of base pairs in four helical segments of Bacillus megaterium ribosomal 5S RNA and its ribonuclease T1 cleavage fragments by means of 500-MHz proton homonuclear Overhauser enhancements.

Three different fragments of Bacillus megaterium ribosomal 5S RNA have been produced by enzymatic cleavage with ribonuclease T1. Fragment A consists of helices II and III, fragment B contains helix IV, and fragment C contains helix I of the universal 5S rRNA secondary structure. All (eight) imino proton resonances in the downfield region (9-15 ppm) of the 500-MHz proton FT NMR spectrum of fragment B have been identified and assigned as G80.C92-G81.C91-G82.C90-A83.++ +U89-C84.G88 and three unpaired U's (U85, U86, and U87) in helix IV by proton homonuclear Overhauser enhancement connectivities. The secondary structure in helix IV of the prokaryotic loop is completely demonstrated spectroscopically for the first time in any native or enzyme-cleaved 5S rRNA. In addition, G21.C58-A20.U59-G19.C60-A18.U61 in helix II, U32.A46-G31.C47-C30.G48-C29.G49 in helix III, and G4.C112-G5.C111-U6.G110 in the terminal stem (helix I) have been assigned by means of NOE experiments on intact 5S rRNA and its fragments A and C. Base pairs in helices I-IV of the universal secondary structure of B. megaterium 5S RNA are described.     

Protein binding sites on Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA; RNA regions that are protected by proteins S7, S9 and S19, and by proteins S8, S15 and S17.

Selected groups of isolated 14C-labelled proteins from E. coli 30S ribosomal subunits were reconstituted with 32P-labelled 16S RNA, and the reconstituted complexes were partially digested with ribonuclease A. RNA fragments protected by the proteins were separated by gel electrophoresis and subjected to sequence analysis. Complexes containing proteins S7 and S19 protected an RNA region comprising helices 29 to 32, part of helix 41, and helices 42 and 43 of the 16S RNA secondary structure. Addition of protein S9 had no effect. When compared with previous data for proteins S7, S9, S14 and S19, these results suggest that S14 interacts with helix 33, and that S9 and S14 together interact with the loop-end of helix 41. Complexes containing proteins S8, S15 and S17 protected helices 7 to 10 as well as the "S8-S15 binding site" (helices 20, 22 and parts of helices 21 and 23). When protein S15 was omitted, S8 and S18 showed protection of part of helix 44 in addition to the latter regions. The results are discussed in terms of our model for the detailed arrangement of proteins and RNA in the 30S subunit.     

Mutational analysis of the conserved bases C1402 and A1500 in the center of the decoding domain of Escherichia coli 16 S rRNA reveals an important tertiary interaction

Interactions within the decoding center of the 30 S ribosomal subunit have been investigated by constructing all 15 possible mutations at nucleotides C1402 and A1500 in helix 44 of 16 S rRNA. As expected, most of the mutations resulted in highly deleterious phenotypes, consistent with the high degree of conservation of this region and its functional importance. A total of seven mutants were viable under conditions where the mutant ribosomes comprised 100 % of the ribosomal pool. A suppressor mutation specific for the C1402U-A1500G mutant was isolated at position 1520 in helix 45 of 16 S rRNA. In addition, lack of dimethylation of A1518/A1519 caused by mutation of the ksgA methylase enhanced the deleterious effect of many of the 1402/1500 mutations. These data suggest that a higher-order interaction between helices 44 and 45 in 16 S rRNA is important for the proper functioning of the ribosome. This is consistent with the recent high-resolution crystal structures of the 30 S subunit, which show a tertiary interaction between the 1402/1500 region of helix 44 and the dimethyl A stem loop.     

Protein S20 Binds Two 16S rRNA Sites as Assembly Is Initiated

Ribosomal protein S20 is a primary binding protein that bridges the 5′ domain and the 3′ minor domain of the 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) in the 30S ribosomal subunit. Using time-dependent dimethyl sulfate modification, we have determined that as it is bound to 16S rRNA, protein S20 causes rapid protection of bases A246, A274, A279, and A282 in the stem region of helix 11 in the 5′ domain and moderately fast modifications of helix 44 bases A1433 and A1434 in the 3′ minor domain. At a later time, enhancements occur with bases A181and A190 in helix 9, bases A325 and A327 in helix 13, and base C264 at the distal end of helix 11 in the 5′ domain of 16S rRNA. The modifications that occur in the stem region of helix 11 are distant from the binding site of protein S20, as determined from the crystal structure. Simultaneous addition of protein S17 with S20 to the complex significantly alters the modifications caused by protein S20 in the stem region of helix 11 but does not alter the remaining modifications. Our results indicate that protein S20 is binding to at least two alternate 16S rRNA sites during the early assembly process.     

Interactions of translational factor EF-G with the bacterial ribosome before and after mRNA translocation

A conserved translation factor, known as EF-G in bacteria, promotes the translocation of tRNA and mRNA in the ribosome during protein synthesis. Here, EF-G.ribosome complexes in two intermediate states, before and after mRNA translocation, have been probed with hydroxyl radicals generated from free Fe(II)-EDTA. Before mRNA translocation and GTP hydrolysis, EF-G protected a limited set of nucleotides in both subunits of the ribosome from cleavage by hydroxyl radicals. In this state, an extensive set of nucleotides, in the platform and head domains of the 30S subunit and in the L7/L12 stalk region of the 50S subunit, became more exposed to hydroxyl radical attack, suggestive of conformational changes in these domains. Following mRNA translocation, EF-G protected a larger set of nucleotides (23S rRNA helices H43, H44, H89, and H95; 16S rRNA helices h5 and h15). No nucleotide with enhanced reactivity to hydroxyl radicals was detected in this latter state. Both before and after mRNA translocation, EF-G protected identical nucleotides in h5 and h15 of the 30S subunit. These results suggest that h5 and h15 may remain associated with EF-G during the dynamic course of the translocation mechanism. Nucleotides in H43 and H44 of the 50S subunit were protected only after translocation and GTP hydrolysis, suggesting that these helices interact dynamically with EF-G. The effects in H95 suggest that EF-G interacts weakly with H95 before mRNA translocation and strongly and more extensively with this helix following mRNA translocation.     

The identification of spermine binding sites in 16S rRNA allows interpretation of the spermine effect on ribosomal 30S subunit functions

A photoreactive analogue of spermine, N¹-azidobenzamidino (ABA)-spermine, was covalently attached after irradiation to Escherichia coli 30S ribosomal subunits or naked 16S rRNA. By means of RNase H digestion and primer extension, the cross-linking sites of ABA-spermine in naked 16S rRNA were characterised and compared with those identified in 30S subunits. The 5′ domain, the internal and terminal loops of helix H24, as well as the upper part of helix H44 in naked 16S rRNA, were found to be preferable binding sites for polyamines. Association of 16S rRNA with ribosomal proteins facilitated its interaction with photoprobe, except for 530 stem–loop nt, whose modification by ABA-spermine was abolished. Association of 30S with 50S subunits, poly(U) and AcPhe-tRNA (complex C) further altered the susceptibility of ABA-spermine cross-linking to 16S rRNA. Complex C, modified in its 30S subunit by ABA-spermine, reacted with puromycin similarly to non-photolabelled complex. On the contrary, poly(U)-programmed 70S ribosomes reconstituted from photolabelled 30S subunits and untreated 50S subunits bound AcPhe-tRNA more efficiently than untreated ribosomes, but were less able to recognise and reject near cognate aminoacyl-tRNA. The above can be interpreted in terms of conformational changes in 16S rRNA, induced by the incorporation of ABA-spermine.     

Position of eukaryotic initiation factor eIF5B on the 80S ribosome mapped by directed hydroxyl radical probing

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor eIF5B is a ribosome-dependent GTPase that mediates displacement of initiation factors from the 40S ribosomal subunit in 48S initiation complexes and joining of 40S and 60S subunits. Here, we determined eIF5B's position on 80S ribosomes by directed hydroxyl radical cleavage. In the resulting model, eIF5B is located in the intersubunit cleft of the 80S ribosome: domain 1 is positioned near the GTPase activating center of the 60S subunit, domain 2 interacts with the 40S subunit (helices 3, 5 and the base of helix 15 of 18S rRNA and ribosomal protein (rp) rpS23), domain 3 is sandwiched between subunits and directly contacts several ribosomal elements including Helix 95 of 28S rRNA and helix 44 of 18S rRNA, domain 4 is near the peptidyl-transferase center and its helical subdomain contacts rpL10E. The cleavage data also indicate that binding of eIF5B might induce conformational changes in both subunits, with ribosomal segments wrapping around the factor. Some of these changes could also occur upon binding of other translational GTPases, and may contribute to factor recognition.     

Tertiary interactions between helices h13 and h44 in 16S RNA contribute to the fidelity of translation

The A-minor interaction, formed between single-stranded adenosines and the minor groove of a receptor helix, is among the most common motifs found in rRNA. Among the A-minors found in 16S rRNA are a set of interactions between adenosines at positions 1433, 1434 and 1468 in helix 44 (h44) and their receptors in the nucleotide 320-340 region of helix 13 (h13). These interactions have been implicated in the maintenance of translational accuracy, because base substitutions at the adjacent C1469 increase miscoding errors. We have tested their functional significance through mutagenesis of h13 and h44. Mutations at the h44 A residues, or the A-minor receptors in h13, increase a variety of translational errors and a subset of the mutants show decreased association between 30S and 50S ribosomal subunits. These results are consistent with the involvement of h13-h44 interactions in the alignment and packing of these helices in the 30S subunit and the importance of this helical alignment for tRNA selection and subunit-subunit interaction.     

Localization of the binding site for protein S4 on 16 S ribosomal RNA by chemical and enzymatic probing and primer extension

We have examined the effect of binding ribosomal protein S4 to 16 S rRNA on the susceptibility of the RNA to a variety of chemical and enzymatic probes. We have used dimethyl sulfate to probe unpaired adenines (at N-1) and cytosines (at N-3), kethoxal to probe unpaired guanines (at N-1 and N-2) and cobra venom (V1) ribonuclease as a probe of base-paired regions of 16 S rRNA. Sites of attack by the probes were identified by primer extension using synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides. Comparison of probing results for naked and S4-bound rRNA shows: Protein S4 protects a relatively compact region of the 5' domain of 16 S rRNA from chemical and enzymatic attack. This region is bounded by nucleotides 27 to 47 and 394 to 556, and has a secondary structure characterized by the junction of five helical elements. Phylogenetically conserved irregular features (bulged nucleotides, internal loops and flanking unpaired nucleotides) and helical phosphodiester bonds of four of the helices are specifically protected in the S4-RNA complex. We conclude that this is the major, and possibly sole region of contact between 16 S rRNA and S4. Many of the S4-dependent changes mimic those observed on assembly of 16 S rRNA into 30 S ribosomal subunits. Binding of S4 causes enhanced chemical reactivity coupled with protection from V1 nuclease outside the S4 junction region in the 530, 720 and 1140 loops. We interpret these results as indicative of loss of structure, and suggest that S4 binding causes disruption of adventitious pairing in these regions, possibly by stabilizing the geometry of the RNA such that these interactions are prevented from forming.