The small GTPase Rab29 is a common regulator of immune synapse assembly and ciliogenesis

Accumulating evidence underscores the T-cell immune synapse (IS) as a site of intense vesicular trafficking, on which productive signaling and cell activation crucially depend. Although the T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) is known to exploit recycling to accumulate to the IS, the specific pathway that controls this process remains to be elucidated. Here we demonstrate that the small GTPase Rab29 is centrally implicated in TCR trafficking and IS assembly. Rab29 colocalized and interacted with Rab8, Rab11 and IFT20, a component of the intraflagellar transport system that regulates ciliogenesis and participates in TCR recycling in the non-ciliated T cell, as assessed by co-immunoprecipitation and immunofluorescence analysis. Rab29 depletion resulted in the inability of TCRs to undergo recycling to the IS, thereby compromizing IS assembly. Under these conditions, recycling TCRs accumulated in Rab11⁺ endosomes that failed to polarize to the IS due to defective Rab29-dependent recruitment of the dynein microtubule motor. Remarkably, Rab29 participates in a similar pathway in ciliated cells to promote primary cilium growth and ciliary localization of Smoothened. These results provide a function for Rab29 as a regulator of receptor recycling and identify this GTPase as a shared participant in IS and primary cilium assembly.T-cell activation is triggered by T-cell antigen receptor (TCR) engagement by MHC-bound peptide dispayed by an antigen presenting cell (APC). While a substantial proportion of the TCR has long been known to be associated with recycling endosomes,¹ it is only recently that the central function of this pool has emerged with the finding that, on assembly of the specialized interface with the APC, known as the immune synapse (IS), intracellular TCRs are delivered to this location by polarized recycling.² This process ensures a steady supply of TCRs at the IS to sustain signaling for T-cell activation³ and has been co-opted by other receptors, such as the transferrin receptor (TfR) and the chemokine receptor CXCR4,^{4, 5} as well as membrane-bound signaling mediators, such as the kinase Lck and the adaptor LAT.^{6, 7}Receptor recycling is orchestrated by the small GTPases Rab4 and Rab11.⁸ Cargo specificity is achieved with the assistance of specific regulators and effectors. The TCR recycling pathway has only started to be delineated with the identification of specific mediators, which include Rab35 and its GAP EPI64C⁹ and the actin adaptor WASH¹⁰. Specific combinations of Rabs and SNAREs have been recently associated with recycling endosomes carrying either Lck, or TCRζ and LAT.¹¹ We have moreover identified IFT20¹² and other components of the intraflagellar transport (IFT) system, which regulates ciliary assembly and function,¹³ as unexpected regulators of TCR recycling in the non-ciliated T cell.¹⁴Recently a Rab GTPase subfamily, which includes Rab29, Rab32 and Rab38, has been implicated in trafficking of the Salmonella-containing vacuole (SCV) in infected epithelial cells.^{15, 16} Rab32 and Rab38 participate in the generation and traffic of melanosomes,¹⁷ while Rab29 regulates retrograde endolysosome-to-Golgi trafficking of the mannose-6-phosphate receptor (MPR) in epithelial and neuronal cells.^{18, 19} Based on the implication of Rab29 in typhoid toxin trafficking to the plasma membrane from the SCV,¹⁵ where Rab4 and Rab11 have also been observed,²⁰ here we assessed the role of Rab29 in the regulation of TCR recycling. The results identify Rab29 as a novel regulator of vesicular trafficking in T cells, acting as a complex with IFT20 and the Rabs Rab8 and Rab11 to control TCR recycling and IS assembly. We also show that Rab29 participates in a similar pathway to control primary cilium growth and the ciliary localization of the receptor Smoothened, undescoring the homologies between cilium and IS.     

RILP suppresses invasion of breast cancer cells by modulating the activity of RalA through interaction with RalGDS

RILP (Rab7-interacting lysosomal protein) is a key regulator for late endosomal/lysosomal trafficking, and probably a tumor suppressor in prostate cancer. However, the role of RILP in other cancers and the underlying mechanism for RILP in regulating the invasion of cancer cells remain to be investigated. In this study, we showed that overexpression of RILP in breast cancer cells inhibits the migration and invasion, whereas the depletion of RILP by RNAi-mediated knockdown promotes the migration and invasion. We identified RalGDS (Ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator) as a novel interacting partner for RILP, and truncation analysis revealed the N-terminal region of RILP is responsible for interacting with the guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF) domain of RalGDS. Immunofluorescence microscopy revealed that RalGDS can be recruited to the late endosomal compartments by RILP. Further investigations indicated that the overexpression of RILP inhibits the activity of RalA, a downstream target of RalGDS. Our data suggest that RILP suppresses the invasion of breast cancer cells by interacting with RalGDS to inhibit its GEF activity for RalA.Diverse alternations of oncogenic factors can either activate or inactivate signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation, migration and apoptosis that are intimately associated with cancer development.^{1, 2, 3} Recent studies suggest that the derailed membrane trafficking is also closely related to cancer development. Activation or attenuation of signal transduction is usually linked to membrane trafficking. The recycling and degradation of surface receptors, such as EGFR, will influence downstream signaling pathways.^{4, 5} Therefore, the cross-talk between membrane trafficking and signaling pathway could be the novel mechanism associated with cancer development.Alternations of the membrane trafficking machineries are established as the causes for some cancers. For examples, Rab25 is overexpressed in breast and ovary caners,⁶ and recent investigations suggest that Rab25 is also related to other cancers.^{7, 8, 9} Arf6 is a vital regulator for the invasive activity of breast cancer cells.¹⁰ Disordered membrane trafficking is emerging as an important property during tumorigenesis, thus the membrane trafficking machineries are potential therapeutic targets for cancer treatment.Rab small GTPases are considered as the master regulators for membrane trafficking.¹¹ The interactions between Rab proteins and their downstream effectors are involved in various steps of vesicle trafficking such as tethering and fusion. Aberrant activities of Rab proteins are closely related to some cancers.^{12, 13, 14, 15} Some Rab proteins mediate the trafficking of cargos, especially membrane proteins on the plasma membrane, such as integrin and E-cadherin. Their aberrant trafficking is proposed to be the underlying mechanism for the functional regulation of Rab protein in cancer cells.^{16, 17}Rab7, together with its downstream effector RILP (Rab7-interacting lysosomal protein), are the key regulators for late endosomal/lysosomal trafficking. RILP interacts with activated GTP-bound Rab7 through its carboxylic terminal region, whereas interacting with dynein/dynactin complex is mediated through its amino region, driving late endosomal/lysosomal trafficking, especially lysosomal positioning.^{18, 19} Rab7 has been demonstrated to be an important factor for cell growth and survival.^{20, 21} Recently, Steffan et al.²² found that RILP suppresses the invasion of prostate cancer cells through inhibiting the anterograde trafficking of lysosomes.²³ Whether the potential role of Rab7-RILP in cell migration/invasion is also implicated in other cancers is of interest to investigate and the underlying molecular mechanism is yet to be defined.In this study, we found that RILP suppresses the proliferation, migration and invasion of breast cancer cells. We also identified (Ral guanine nucleotide dissociation stimulator (RalGDS) as a novel interacting partner for RILP. The interaction of RILP with RalGDS modulates the activity of RalA. Our results suggest that RILP suppresses the invasion of breast cancer cells by modulating the activity of RalA through interaction with RalGDS.     

TRAF2 is a biologically important necroptosis suppressor

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) triggers necroptotic cell death through an intracellular signaling complex containing receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1 and RIPK3, called the necrosome. RIPK1 phosphorylates RIPK3, which phosphorylates the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase-domain-like (MLKL)—driving its oligomerization and membrane-disrupting necroptotic activity. Here, we show that TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2)—previously implicated in apoptosis suppression—also inhibits necroptotic signaling by TNFα. TRAF2 disruption in mouse fibroblasts augmented TNFα–driven necrosome formation and RIPK3-MLKL association, promoting necroptosis. TRAF2 constitutively associated with MLKL, whereas TNFα reversed this via cylindromatosis-dependent TRAF2 deubiquitination. Ectopic interaction of TRAF2 and MLKL required the C-terminal portion but not the N-terminal, RING, or CIM region of TRAF2. Induced TRAF2 knockout (KO) in adult mice caused rapid lethality, in conjunction with increased hepatic necrosome assembly. By contrast, TRAF2 KO on a RIPK3 KO background caused delayed mortality, in concert with elevated intestinal caspase-8 protein and activity. Combined injection of TNFR1-Fc, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc decoys prevented death upon TRAF2 KO. However, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc were ineffective, whereas TNFR1-Fc and interferon α receptor (IFNAR1)-Fc were partially protective against lethality upon combined TRAF2 and RIPK3 KO. These results identify TRAF2 as an important biological suppressor of necroptosis in vitro and in vivo.Apoptotic cell death is mediated by caspases and has distinct morphological features, including membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage and nuclear fragmentation.^{1, 2, 3, 4} In contrast, necroptotic cell death is caspase-independent and is characterized by loss of membrane integrity, cell swelling and implosion.^{1, 2, 5} Nevertheless, necroptosis is a highly regulated process, requiring activation of RIPK1 and RIPK3, which form the core necrosome complex.^{1, 2, 5} Necrosome assembly can be induced via specific death receptors or toll-like receptors, among other modules.^{6, 7, 8, 9} The activated necrosome engages MLKL by RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation.^{6, 10, 11} MLKL then oligomerizes and binds to membrane phospholipids, forming pores that cause necroptotic cell death.^{10, 12, 13, 14, 15} Unchecked necroptosis disrupts embryonic development in mice and contributes to several human diseases.^{7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22}The apoptotic mediators FADD, caspase-8 and cFLIP suppress necroptosis.^{19, 20, 21, 23, 24} Elimination of any of these genes in mice causes embryonic lethality, subverted by additional deletion of RIPK3 or MLKL.^{19, 20, 21, 25} Necroptosis is also regulated at the level of RIPK1. Whereas TNFα engagement of TNFR1 leads to K63-linked ubiquitination of RIPK1 by cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) to promote nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation,²⁶ necroptosis requires suppression or reversal of this modification to allow RIPK1 autophosphorylation and consequent RIPK3 activation.^{2, 23, 27, 28} CYLD promotes necroptotic signaling by deubiquitinating RIPK1, augmenting its interaction with RIPK3.²⁹ Conversely, caspase-8-mediated CYLD cleavage inhibits necroptosis.²⁴TRAF2 recruits cIAPs to the TNFα-TNFR1 signaling complex, facilitating NF-κB activation.^{30, 31, 32, 33} TRAF2 also supports K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of death-receptor-activated caspase-8, curbing apoptosis.³⁴ TRAF2 KO mice display embryonic lethality; some survive through birth but have severe developmental and immune deficiencies and die prematurely.^{35, 36} Conditional TRAF2 KO leads to rapid intestinal inflammation and mortality.³⁷ Furthermore, hepatic TRAF2 depletion augments apoptosis activation via Fas/CD95.³⁴ TRAF2 attenuates necroptosis induction in vitro by the death ligands Apo2L/TRAIL and Fas/CD95L.³⁸ However, it remains unclear whether TRAF2 regulates TNFα-induced necroptosis—and if so—how. Our present findings reveal that TRAF2 inhibits TNFα necroptotic signaling. Furthermore, our results establish TRAF2 as a biologically important necroptosis suppressor in vitro and in vivo and provide initial insight into the mechanisms underlying this function.     

RPG1-B-Derived Resistance to AvrB-Expressing Pseudomonas syringae Requires RIN4-Like Proteins in Soybean

Soybean (Glycine max) RPG1-B (for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv glycinea) mediates species-specific resistance to P. syringae expressing the avirulence protein AvrB, similar to the nonorthologous RPM1 in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). RPM1-derived signaling is presumably induced upon AvrB-derived modification of the RPM1-interacting protein, RIN4 (for RPM1-interacting 4). We show that, similar to RPM1, RPG1-B does not directly interact with AvrB but associates with RIN4-like proteins from soybean. Unlike Arabidopsis, soybean contains at least four RIN4-like proteins (GmRIN4a to GmRIN4d). GmRIN4b, but not GmRIN4a, complements the Arabidopsis rin4 mutation. Both GmRIN4a and GmRIN4b bind AvrB, but only GmRIN4b binds RPG1-B. Silencing either GmRIN4a or GmRIN4b abrogates RPG1-B-derived resistance to P. syringae expressing AvrB. Binding studies show that GmRIN4b interacts with GmRIN4a as well as with two other AvrB/RPG1-B-interacting isoforms, GmRIN4c and GmRIN4d. The lack of functional redundancy among GmRIN4a and GmRIN4b and their abilities to interact with each other suggest that the two proteins might function as a heteromeric complex in mediating RPG1-B-derived resistance. Silencing GmRIN4a or GmRIN4b in rpg1-b plants enhances basal resistance to virulent strains of P. syringae and the oomycete Phytophthora sojae. Interestingly, GmRIN4a- or GmRIN4b-silenced rpg1-b plants respond differently to AvrB-expressing bacteria. Although both GmRIN4a and GmRIN4b function to monitor AvrB in the presence of RPG1-B, GmRIN4a, but not GmRIN4b, negatively regulates AvrB virulence activity in the absence of RPG1-B.One of the myriad plant defense responses activated upon pathogen invasion is signaling induced via the activation of resistance (R) proteins. R gene-mediated resistance is generally activated in response to race-specific pathogen effectors, termed avirulence proteins (Avr), and often results in the development of a hypersensitive reaction at the site of pathogen entry (Dangl et al., 1996). The hypersensitive reaction is a form of programmed cell death that results in the formation of necrotic lesions around the site of pathogen entry and is thought to help prevent pathogen spread by confining it to the dead cells.A majority of the known R proteins contain conserved structural domains, including N-terminal coiled coil (CC) or Toll-interleukin 1 receptor (TIR)-like domains, central nucleotide-binding site (NBS), and C-terminal Leu-rich repeat (LRR) domains (Martin et al., 2003). While some R proteins “perceive” pathogen presence via direct physical interactions with the cognate Avr proteins (Scofield et al., 1996; Jia et al., 2000; Leister and Katagiri, 2000; Deslandes et al., 2003), several others likely do so indirectly. This led to the suggestion that R proteins monitor the presence of Avr proteins by “guarding” other host proteins targeted by the pathogen effector (Van der Biezen and Jones, 1998; Innes, 2004; Jones and Dangl, 2006). Avr proteins enhance pathogen virulence in genetic backgrounds lacking cognate R proteins by targeting components of the host basal defense machinery, including “guardee” proteins (Chang et al., 2000; Guttman and Greenberg, 2001; Chen et al., 2004, Kim et al., 2005b; Ong and Innes, 2006; van Esse et al., 2007; Shan et al., 2008; Xiang et al., 2008). However, some Avr proteins were found to also target host proteins that do not contribute to the virulence function of the effector (Shang et al., 2006; Shabab et al., 2008; Zhou and Chai, 2008; Zipfel and Rathjen, 2008). This led to the proposition that plants express “decoy” proteins that mimic Avr-guardee recognition in the presence of the R protein. This decoy model suggests that, unlike guardees, decoy proteins do not directly contribute to host basal immunity, such that Avr-derived alterations of decoys do not enhance pathogen virulence in plants lacking the R protein (van der Hoorn and Kamoun, 2008).A well-studied example of an indirect mode of effector recognition is that of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) R protein, RPM1 (for resistance to Pseudomonas syringae pv maculicola 1). RPM1 mediates resistance against bacteria expressing two different Avr proteins, AvrRpm1 (AvrRpm1_PmaM6) and AvrB (AvrB1_Pgyrace4). Although RPM1 does not directly interact with either AvrRpm1 or AvrB, it does associate with RIN4 (for RPM1-interacting 4), which interacts with AvrRpm1 and AvrB. RIN4 is required for RPM1-induced resistance to AvrRpm1/AvrB-expressing P. syringae (Mackey et al., 2002). Both AvrRpm1 and AvrB induce the phosphorylation of RIN4, which is thought to induce RPM1-mediated resistance signaling. RIN4 also associates with a second Arabidopsis R protein, RPS2 (for resistance to P. syringae), which mediates resistance against P. syringae expressing AvrRpt2. RPS2-mediated signaling is activated when AvrRpt2 (AvrRpt2_PtoJL1065), a Cys protease, cleaves RIN4 (Axtell and Staskawicz, 2003; Mackey et al., 2003; Kim et al., 2005a). The AvrRpt2-triggered loss of RIN4 compromises RPM1-mediated resistance, because RIN4 is not available for phosphorylation (Ritter and Dangl, 1996; Axtell and Staskawicz, 2003; Mackey et al., 2003).The avirulence effector AvrB was first isolated from a P. syringae strain colonizing soybean (Glycine max) and used to identify the cognate resistance locus RPG1 in soybean (Staskawicz et al., 1987; Keen and Buzzell, 1991). This locus contains the RPG1-B (for resistance to P. syringae pv glycinea) gene, which encodes a CC-NBS-LRR protein conferring resistance to AvrB-expressing P. syringae in soybean (Bisgrove et al., 1994; Ashfield et al., 2004). Unlike RPM1, RPG1-B does not confer specificity to AvrRpm1 (Ashfield et al., 1995). However, as in Arabidopsis, the soybean RPG1-B-derived hypersensitive reaction to AvrB-expressing bacteria is inhibited by the presence of AvrRpt2-expressing bacteria (Axtell and Staskawicz, 2003, Mackey et al., 2003; Ashfield et al., 2004). This suggests that RPG1-B and RPM1 might utilize common signaling components even though they share very limited sequence identity. Therefore, we investigated the possible involvement of RIN4-like proteins in RPG1-B-mediated resistance signaling. In addition to Arabidopsis, RIN4-like proteins have also been identified in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and lettuce (Lactuca sativa; Jeuken et al., 2009; Luo et al., 2009). In tomato, the NBS-LRR protein, Prf (for Pseudomonas resistance and fenthion sensitivity), and its interacting protein kinase, Pto, mediate resistance to the AvrPto (AvrPto1_PtoJL1065)-expressing strain of P. syringae (Scofield et al., 1996; Tang et al., 1996; Kim et al., 2002; Mucyn et al., 2006). AvrPto binds RIN4 proteins from both Arabidopsis (AtRIN4) and tomato (SlRIN4). Similar to AvrRpt2, AvrPto induces the proteolysis of RIN4, albeit only in the presence of Pto and Prf (Luo et al., 2009). However, in the case of AvrPto, degradation of RIN4 is the result of induced proteolytic activity in the plant, rather than that of AvrPto itself. In Lactuca (lettuce) species, the L. saligna RIN4 allele was recently shown to be essential for resistance to an avirulent strain of the downy mildew pathogen, Bremia lactucae (Jeuken et al., 2009).Here, we report that two functionally nonredundant isoforms of soybean RIN4 (GmRIN4) function in RPG1-B-derived resistance as well as in the virulence activity of AvrB in the absence of RPG1-B.     

Induction of COX-2-PGE2 synthesis by activation of the MAPK/ERK pathway contributes to neuronal death triggered by TDP-43-depleted microglia

Neuroinflammation is a striking hallmark of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) and other neurodegenerative disorders. Previous studies have shown the contribution of glial cells such as astrocytes in TDP-43-linked ALS. However, the role of microglia in TDP-43-mediated motor neuron degeneration remains poorly understood. In this study, we show that depletion of TDP-43 in microglia, but not in astrocytes, strikingly upregulates cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression and prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production through the activation of MAPK/ERK signaling and initiates neurotoxicity. Moreover, we find that administration of celecoxib, a specific COX-2 inhibitor, greatly diminishes the neurotoxicity triggered by TDP-43-depleted microglia. Taken together, our results reveal a previously unrecognized non-cell-autonomous mechanism in TDP-43-mediated neurodegeneration, identifying COX-2-PGE2 as the molecular events of microglia- but not astrocyte-initiated neurotoxicity and identifying celecoxib as a novel potential therapy for TDP-43-linked ALS and possibly other types of ALS.Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is an adult-onset neurodegenerative disease characterized by the degeneration of motor neurons in the brain and spinal cord.¹ Most cases of ALS are sporadic, but 10% are familial. Familial ALS cases are associated with mutations in genes such as Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), TAR DNA-binding protein 43 (TARDBP) and, most recently discovered, C9orf72. Currently, most available information obtained from ALS research is based on the study of SOD1, but new studies focusing on TARDBP and C9orf72 have come to the forefront of ALS research.^{1, 2} The discovery of the central role of the protein TDP-43, encoded by TARDBP, in ALS was a breakthrough in ALS research.^{3, 4, 5} Although pathogenic mutations of TDP-43 are genetically rare, abnormal TDP-43 function is thought to be associated with the majority of ALS cases.¹ TDP-43 was identified as a key component of the ubiquitin-positive inclusions in most ALS patients and also in other neurodegenerative diseases such as frontotemporal lobar degeneration,^{6, 7} Alzheimer''s disease (AD)^{8, 9} and Parkinson''s disease (PD).^{10, 11} TDP-43 is a multifunctional RNA binding protein, and loss-of-function of TDP-43 has been increasingly recognized as a key contributor in TDP-43-mediated pathogenesis.^{5, 12, 13, 14}Neuroinflammation, a striking and common hallmark involved in many neurodegenerative diseases, including ALS, is characterized by extensive activation of glial cells including microglia, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes.^{15, 16} Although numerous studies have focused on the intrinsic properties of motor neurons in ALS, a large amount of evidence showed that glial cells, such as astrocytes and microglia, could have critical roles in SOD1-mediated motor neuron degeneration and ALS progression,^{17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22} indicating the importance of non-cell-autonomous toxicity in SOD1-mediated ALS pathogenesis.Very interestingly, a vital insight of neuroinflammation research in ALS was generated by the evidence that both the mRNA and protein levels of the pro-inflammatory enzyme cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) are upregulated in both transgenic mouse models and in human postmortem brain and spinal cord.^{23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} The role of COX-2 neurotoxicity in ALS and other neurodegenerative disorders has been well explored.^{30, 31, 32} One of the key downstream products of COX-2, prostaglandin E2 (PGE2), can directly mediate COX-2 neurotoxicity both in vitro and in vivo.^{33, 34, 35, 36, 37} The levels of COX-2 expression and PGE2 production are controlled by multiple cell signaling pathways, including the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)/ERK pathway,^{38, 39, 40} and they have been found to be increased in neurodegenerative diseases including AD, PD and ALS.^{25, 28, 32, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46} Importantly, COX-2 inhibitors such as celecoxib exhibited significant neuroprotective effects and prolonged survival or delayed disease onset in a SOD1-ALS transgenic mouse model through the downregulation of PGE2 release.²⁸Most recent studies have tried to elucidate the role of glial cells in neurotoxicity using TDP-43-ALS models, which are considered to be helpful for better understanding the disease mechanisms.^{47, 48, 49, 50, 51} Although the contribution of glial cells to TDP-43-mediated motor neuron degeneration is now well supported, this model does not fully suggest an astrocyte-based non-cell autonomous mechanism. For example, recent studies have shown that TDP-43-mutant astrocytes do not affect the survival of motor neurons,^{50, 51} indicating a previously unrecognized non-cell autonomous TDP-43 proteinopathy that associates with cell types other than astrocytes.Given that the role of glial cell types other than astrocytes in TDP-43-mediated neuroinflammation is still not fully understood, we aim to compare the contribution of microglia and astrocytes to neurotoxicity in a TDP-43 loss-of-function model. Here, we show that TDP-43 has a dominant role in promoting COX-2-PGE2 production through the MAPK/ERK pathway in primary cultured microglia, but not in primary cultured astrocytes. Our study suggests that overproduction of PGE2 in microglia is a novel molecular mechanism underlying neurotoxicity in TDP-43-linked ALS. Moreover, our data identify celecoxib as a new potential effective treatment of TDP-43-linked ALS and possibly other types of ALS.     

Wallenda regulates JNK-mediated cell death in Drosophila

The c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) pathway plays essential roles in regulating a variety of cellular processes including proliferation, migration and survival. Previous genetic studies in Drosophila have identified numerous cell death regulating genes, providing new insights into the mechanisms for related diseases. Despite the known role of the small GTPase Rac1 in regulating cell death, the downstream components and underlying mechanism remain largely elusive. Here, we show that Rac1 promotes JNK-dependent cell death through Wallenda (Wnd). In addition, we find that Wnd triggers JNK activation and cell death via its kinase domain. Moreover, we show that both MKK4 and Hep are critical for Wnd-induced cell death. Furthermore, Wnd is essential for ectopic Egr- or Rho1-induced JNK activation and cell death. Finally, Wnd is physiologically required for loss of scribble-induced JNK-dependent cell death. Thus, our data suggest that wnd encodes a novel essential cell death regulator in Drosophila.Programmed cell death (PCD) is a fundamental biological process required for normal organ development and tissue homeostasis in multicellular organisms.¹ Disruption of PCD would result in a variety of diseases including neurodegenerative diseases, autoimmune disorders and cancers.² Drosophila melanogaster, with its well-established genetic techniques and compact genome size, has been regarded as an excellent model organism to study PCD and its related signaling pathways.^{3, 4} The c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling has been implicated as one of the most important pathways that regulates various fundamental cell behaviors, such as proliferation, migration and cell death.^{5, 6}Rac1 belongs to the Rho family of small GTPase that regulates many aspects of physiological activities ranging from immune response to wound healing and migration.^{7, 8, 9, 10, 11} For instance, Rac1 has been implicated in JNK-mediated dorsal closure via Slpr (Slipper) in fly,⁷ osteoclast differentiation through TAK1-mediated NF-κB signaling¹² and myocyte hypertrophy via Ask1 (apoptotic signal-regulating kinase 1) in mammals.¹³ However, despite the reported role of Rac1 in cell death,¹⁴ its underlying mechanism and downstream components remain largely elusive.Here by using Drosophila compound eye as a model, we found Rac1 expression induces JNK-dependent cell death and identified Wallenda (Wnd), a MAPKKK (mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase kinase) member as an essential downstream mediator. Furthermore, we found that Wnd is sufficient to induce JNK-mediated cell death through both Hep and MKK4. Finally, we established Wnd as a general modulator of cell death in Drosophila by showing that it is also required for ectopic Egr or Rho1 and loss of Scribble (Scrib)-induced cell death.     

A cellular screen identifies ponatinib and pazopanib as inhibitors of necroptosis

Necroptosis is a form of regulated necrotic cell death mediated by receptor-interacting serine/threonine-protein kinase 1 (RIPK1) and RIPK3. Necroptotic cell death contributes to the pathophysiology of several disorders involving tissue damage, including myocardial infarction, stroke and ischemia-reperfusion injury. However, no inhibitors of necroptosis are currently in clinical use. Here we performed a phenotypic screen for small-molecule inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α)-induced necroptosis in Fas-associated protein with death domain (FADD)-deficient Jurkat cells using a representative panel of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs. We identified two anti-cancer agents, ponatinib and pazopanib, as submicromolar inhibitors of necroptosis. Both compounds inhibited necroptotic cell death induced by various cell death receptor ligands in human cells, while not protecting from apoptosis. Ponatinib and pazopanib abrogated phosphorylation of mixed lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) upon TNF-α-induced necroptosis, indicating that both agents target a component upstream of MLKL. An unbiased chemical proteomic approach determined the cellular target spectrum of ponatinib, revealing key members of the necroptosis signaling pathway. We validated RIPK1, RIPK3 and transforming growth factor-β-activated kinase 1 (TAK1) as novel, direct targets of ponatinib by using competitive binding, cellular thermal shift and recombinant kinase assays. Ponatinib inhibited both RIPK1 and RIPK3, while pazopanib preferentially targeted RIPK1. The identification of the FDA-approved drugs ponatinib and pazopanib as cellular inhibitors of necroptosis highlights them as potentially interesting for the treatment of pathologies caused or aggravated by necroptotic cell death.Programmed cell death has a crucial role in a variety of biological processes ranging from normal tissue development to diverse pathological conditions.^{1, 2} Necroptosis is a form of regulated cell death that has been shown to occur during pathogen infection or sterile injury-induced inflammation in conditions where apoptosis signaling is compromised.^{3, 4, 5, 6} Given that many viruses have developed strategies to circumvent apoptotic cell death, necroptosis constitutes an important, pro-inflammatory back-up mechanism that limits viral spread in vivo.^{7, 8, 9} In contrast, in the context of sterile inflammation, necroptotic cell death contributes to disease pathology, outlining potential benefits of therapeutic intervention.¹⁰ Necroptosis can be initiated by death receptors of the tumor necrosis factor (TNF) superfamily,¹¹ Toll-like receptor 3 (TLR3),¹² TLR4,¹³ DNA-dependent activator of IFN-regulatory factors¹⁴ or interferon receptors.¹⁵ Downstream signaling is subsequently conveyed via RIPK1¹⁶ or TIR-domain-containing adapter-inducing interferon-β,^{8, 17} and converges on RIPK3-mediated^{13, 18, 19, 20} activation of MLKL.²¹ Phosphorylated MLKL triggers membrane rupture,^{22, 23, 24, 25, 26} releasing pro-inflammatory cellular contents to the extracellular space.²⁷ Studies using the RIPK1 inhibitor necrostatin-1 (Nec-1) ²⁸ or RIPK3-deficient mice have established a role for necroptosis in the pathophysiology of pancreatitis,¹⁹ artherosclerosis,²⁹ retinal cell death,³⁰ ischemic organ damage and ischemia-reperfusion injury in both the kidney³¹ and the heart.³² Moreover, allografts from RIPK3-deficient mice are better protected from rejection, suggesting necroptosis inhibition as a therapeutic option to improve transplant outcome.³³ Besides Nec-1, several tool compounds inhibiting different pathway members have been described,^{12, 16, 21, 34, 35} however, no inhibitors of necroptosis are available for clinical use so far.^{2, 10} In this study we screened a library of FDA approved drugs for the precise purpose of identifying already existing and generally safe chemical agents that could be used as necroptosis inhibitors. We identified the two structurally distinct kinase inhibitors pazopanib and ponatinib as potent blockers of necroptosis targeting the key enzymes RIPK1/3.     

Stress-induced ceramide generation and apoptosis via the phosphorylation and activation of nSMase1 by JNK signaling

Neutral sphingomyelinase (nSMase) activation in response to environmental stress or inflammatory cytokine stimuli generates the second messenger ceramide, which mediates the stress-induced apoptosis. However, the signaling pathways and activation mechanism underlying this process have yet to be elucidated. Here we show that the phosphorylation of nSMase1 (sphingomyelin phosphodiesterase 2, SMPD2) by c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling stimulates ceramide generation and apoptosis and provide evidence for a signaling mechanism that integrates stress- and cytokine-activated apoptosis in vertebrate cells. An nSMase1 was identified as a JNK substrate, and the phosphorylation site responsible for its effects on stress and cytokine induction was Ser-270. In zebrafish cells, the substitution of Ser-270 for alanine blocked the phosphorylation and activation of nSMase1, whereas the substitution of Ser-270 for negatively charged glutamic acid mimicked the effect of phosphorylation. The JNK inhibitor SP600125 blocked the phosphorylation and activation of nSMase1, which in turn blocked ceramide signaling and apoptosis. A variety of stress conditions, including heat shock, UV exposure, hydrogen peroxide treatment, and anti-Fas antibody stimulation, led to the phosphorylation of nSMase1, activated nSMase1, and induced ceramide generation and apoptosis in zebrafish embryonic ZE and human Jurkat T cells. In addition, the depletion of MAPK8/9 or SMPD2 by RNAi knockdown decreased ceramide generation and stress- and cytokine-induced apoptosis in Jurkat cells. Therefore the phosphorylation of nSMase1 is a pivotal step in JNK signaling, which leads to ceramide generation and apoptosis under stress conditions and in response to cytokine stimulation. nSMase1 has a common central role in ceramide signaling during the stress and cytokine responses and apoptosis.The sphingomyelin pathway is initiated by the hydrolysis of sphingomyelin to generate the second messenger ceramide.¹ Sphingomyelin hydrolysis is a major pathway for stress-induced ceramide generation. Neutral sphingomyelinase (nSMase) is activated by a variety of environmental stress conditions, such as heat shock,^{1, 2, 3} oxidative stress (hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂), oxidized lipoproteins),¹ ultraviolet (UV) radiation,¹ chemotherapeutic agents,⁴ and β-amyloid peptides.^{5, 6} Cytokines, including tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α,^{7, 8, 9} interleukin (IL)-1β,¹⁰ Fas ligand,¹¹ and their associated proteins, also trigger the activation of nSMase.¹² Membrane-bound Mg²⁺-dependent nSMase is considered to be a strong candidate for mediating the effects of stress and inflammatory cytokines on ceramide.³Among the four vertebrate nSMases, nSMase1 (SMPD2) was the first to be cloned and is localized in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and Golgi apparatus.¹³ Several studies have focused on the potential signaling roles of nSMase1, and some reports have suggested that nSMase1 is important for ceramide generation in response to stress.^{5, 6, 14, 15} In addition, nSMase1 is responsible for heat-induced apoptosis in zebrafish embryonic cultured (ZE) cells, and a loss-of-function study showed a reduction in ceramide generation, caspase-3 activation, and apoptosis in zebrafish embryos.¹⁶ However, nSMase1-knockout mice showed no lipid storage diseases or abnormalities in sphingomyelin metabolism.¹⁷ Therefore, the molecular mechanisms by which nSMase1 is activated have yet to be elucidated.Environmental stress and inflammatory cytokines^{1, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27} stimulate stress-activated protein kinase (SAPK)/c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK) signaling, which involves the sequential activation of members of the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) family, including MAPK/ERK kinase kinase (MEKK)1/MAPK kinase (MKK)4, and/or SAPK/ERK kinase (SEK)1/MKK7, JNK, and c-jun. Both the JNK and sphingomyelin signaling pathways coordinately mediate the induction of apoptosis.¹ However, possible crosstalk between the JNK and sphingomyelin signaling pathways has not yet been characterized. Previously, we used SDS-PAGE to determine that nSMase1 polypeptides migrated at higher molecular masses,¹⁶ suggesting that the sphingomyelin signaling pathway might cause the production of a chemically modified phosphorylated nSMase1, which is stimulated under stressed conditions in ZE cells.¹⁶ Here, we demonstrate that JNK signaling results in the phosphorylation of Ser-270 of nSMase1, which initiates ceramide generation and apoptosis. We also provide evidence for a signaling mechanism that integrates cytokine- and stress-activated apoptosis in vertebrate cells. We studied stress-induced ceramide generation in two cell types: ZE cells and human leukemia Jurkat T-lymphoid cells. Stress-induced apoptosis has been investigated in these systems previously.^{16, 28}     

Plasma membrane poration by opioid neuropeptides: a possible mechanism of pathological signal transduction

Neuropeptides induce signal transduction across the plasma membrane by acting through cell-surface receptors. The dynorphins, endogenous ligands for opioid receptors, are an exception; they also produce non-receptor-mediated effects causing pain and neurodegeneration. To understand non-receptor mechanism(s), we examined interactions of dynorphins with plasma membrane. Using fluorescence correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp electrophysiology, we demonstrate that dynorphins accumulate in the membrane and induce a continuum of transient increases in ionic conductance. This phenomenon is consistent with stochastic formation of giant (~2.7 nm estimated diameter) unstructured non-ion-selective membrane pores. The potency of dynorphins to porate the plasma membrane correlates with their pathogenic effects in cellular and animal models. Membrane poration by dynorphins may represent a mechanism of pathological signal transduction. Persistent neuronal excitation by this mechanism may lead to profound neuropathological alterations, including neurodegeneration and cell death.Neuropeptides are the largest and most diverse family of neurotransmitters. They are released from axon terminals and dendrites, diffuse to pre- or postsynaptic neuronal structures and activate membrane G-protein-coupled receptors. Prodynorphin (PDYN)-derived opioid peptides including dynorphin A (Dyn A), dynorphin B (Dyn B) and big dynorphin (Big Dyn) consisting of Dyn A and Dyn B are endogenous ligands for the κ-opioid receptor. Acting through this receptor, dynorphins regulate processing of pain and emotions, memory acquisition and modulate reward induced by addictive substances.^{1, 2, 3, 4} Furthermore, dynorphins may produce robust cellular and behavioral effects that are not mediated through opioid receptors.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29} As evident from pharmacological, morphological, genetic and human neuropathological studies, these effects are generally pathological, including cell death, neurodegeneration, neurological dysfunctions and chronic pain. Big Dyn is the most active pathogenic peptide, which is about 10- to 100-fold more potent than Dyn A, whereas Dyn B does not produce non-opioid effects.^{16, 17, 22, 25} Big Dyn enhances activity of acid-sensing ion channel-1a (ASIC1a) and potentiates ASIC1a-mediated cell death in nanomolar concentrations^{30, 31} and, when administered intrathecally, induces characteristic nociceptive behavior at femtomolar doses.^{17, 22} Inhibition of endogenous Big Dyn degradation results in pathological pain, whereas prodynorphin (Pdyn) knockout mice do not maintain neuropathic pain.^{22, 32} Big Dyn differs from its constituents Dyn A and Dyn B in its unique pattern of non-opioid memory-enhancing, locomotor- and anxiolytic-like effects.²⁵Pathological role of dynorphins is emphasized by the identification of PDYN missense mutations that cause profound neurodegeneration in the human brain underlying the SCA23 (spinocerebellar ataxia type 23), a very rare dominantly inherited neurodegenerative disorder.^{27, 33} Most PDYN mutations are located in the Big Dyn domain, demonstrating its critical role in neurodegeneration. PDYN mutations result in marked elevation in dynorphin levels and increase in its pathogenic non-opioid activity.^{27, 34} Dominant-negative pathogenic effects of dynorphins are not produced through opioid receptors.ASIC1a, glutamate NMDA (N-methyl-d-aspartate) and AMPA (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid)/kainate ion channels, and melanocortin and bradykinin B2 receptors have all been implicated as non-opioid dynorphin targets.^{5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 30, 31, 35, 36} Multiplicity of these targets and their association with the cellular membrane suggest that their activation is a secondary event triggered by a primary interaction of dynorphins with the membrane. Dynorphins are among the most basic neuropeptides.^{37, 38} The basic nature is also a general property of anti-microbial peptides (AMPs) and amyloid peptides that act by inducing membrane perturbations, altering membrane curvature and causing pore formation that disrupts membrane-associated processes including ion fluxes across the membrane.³⁹ The similarity between dynorphins and these two peptide groups in overall charge and size suggests a similar mode of their interactions with membranes.In this study, we dissect the interactions of dynorphins with the cell membrane, the primary event in their non-receptor actions. Using fluorescence imaging, correlation spectroscopy and patch-clamp techniques, we demonstrate that dynorphin peptides accumulate in the plasma membrane in live cells and cause a profound transient increase in cell membrane conductance. Membrane poration by endogenous neuropeptides may represent a novel mechanism of signal transduction in the brain. This mechanism may underlie effects of dynorphins under pathological conditions including chronic pain and tissue injury.     

Calcineurin B-Like Protein-Interacting Protein Kinase CIPK21 Regulates Osmotic and Salt Stress Responses in Arabidopsis

The role of calcium-mediated signaling has been extensively studied in plant responses to abiotic stress signals. Calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs) and CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) constitute a complex signaling network acting in diverse plant stress responses. Osmotic stress imposed by soil salinity and drought is a major abiotic stress that impedes plant growth and development and involves calcium-signaling processes. In this study, we report the functional analysis of CIPK21, an Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) CBL-interacting protein kinase, ubiquitously expressed in plant tissues and up-regulated under multiple abiotic stress conditions. The growth of a loss-of-function mutant of CIPK21, cipk21, was hypersensitive to high salt and osmotic stress conditions. The calcium sensors CBL2 and CBL3 were found to physically interact with CIPK21 and target this kinase to the tonoplast. Moreover, preferential localization of CIPK21 to the tonoplast was detected under salt stress condition when coexpressed with CBL2 or CBL3. These findings suggest that CIPK21 mediates responses to salt stress condition in Arabidopsis, at least in part, by regulating ion and water homeostasis across the vacuolar membranes.Drought and salinity cause osmotic stress in plants and severely affect crop productivity throughout the world. Plants respond to osmotic stress by changing a number of cellular processes (Xiong et al., 1999; Xiong and Zhu, 2002; Bartels and Sunkar, 2005; Boudsocq and Lauriére, 2005). Some of these changes include activation of stress-responsive genes, regulation of membrane transport at both plasma membrane (PM) and vacuolar membrane (tonoplast) to maintain water and ionic homeostasis, and metabolic changes to produce compatible osmolytes such as Pro (Stewart and Lee, 1974; Krasensky and Jonak, 2012). It has been well established that a specific calcium (Ca²⁺) signature is generated in response to a particular environmental stimulus (Trewavas and Malhó, 1998; Scrase-Field and Knight, 2003; Luan, 2009; Kudla et al., 2010). The Ca²⁺ changes are primarily perceived by several Ca²⁺ sensors such as calmodulin (Reddy, 2001; Luan et al., 2002), Ca²⁺-dependent protein kinases (Harper and Harmon, 2005), calcineurin B-like proteins (CBLs; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Pandey, 2008; Luan, 2009; Sanyal et al., 2015), and other Ca²⁺-binding proteins (Reddy, 2001; Shao et al., 2008) to initiate various cellular responses.Plant CBL-type Ca²⁺ sensors interact with and activate CBL-interacting protein kinases (CIPKs) that phosphorylate downstream components to transduce Ca²⁺ signals (Liu et al., 2000; Luan et al., 2002; Batistič and Kudla, 2004; Luan, 2009). In several plant species, multiple members have been identified in the CBL and CIPK family (Luan et al., 2002; Kolukisaoglu et al., 2004; Pandey, 2008; Batistič and Kudla, 2009; Weinl and Kudla, 2009; Pandey et al., 2014). Involvement of specific CBL-CIPK pair to decode a particular type of signal entails the alternative and selective complex formation leading to stimulus-response coupling (D’Angelo et al., 2006; Batistič et al., 2010).Several CBL and CIPK family members have been implicated in plant responses to drought, salinity, and osmotic stress based on genetic analysis of Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) mutants (Zhu, 2002; Cheong et al., 2003, 2007; Kim et al., 2003; Pandey et al., 2004, 2008; D’Angelo et al., 2006; Qin et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Held et al., 2011; Tang et al., 2012; Drerup et al., 2013; Eckert et al., 2014). A few CIPKs have also been functionally characterized by gain-of-function approach in crop plants such as rice (Oryza sativa), pea (Pisum sativum), and maize (Zea mays) and were found to be involved in osmotic stress responses (Mahajan et al., 2006; Xiang et al., 2007; Yang et al., 2008; Tripathi et al., 2009; Zhao et al., 2009; Cuéllar et al., 2010).In this report, we examined the role of the Arabidopsis CIPK21 gene in osmotic stress response by reverse genetic analysis. The loss-of-function mutant plants became hypersensitive to salt and mannitol stress conditions, suggesting that CIPK21 is involved in the regulation of osmotic stress response in Arabidopsis. These findings are further supported by an enhanced tonoplast targeting of the cytoplasmic CIPK21 through interaction with the vacuolar Ca²⁺ sensors CBL2 and CBL3 under salt stress condition.     

Ret is essential to mediate GDNF's neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effect in a Parkinson disease mouse model

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a potent survival and regeneration-promoting factor for dopaminergic neurons in cell and animal models of Parkinson disease (PD). GDNF is currently tested in clinical trials on PD patients with so far inconclusive results. The receptor tyrosine kinase Ret is the canonical GDNF receptor, but several alternative GDNF receptors have been proposed, raising the question of which signaling receptor mediates here the beneficial GDNF effects. To address this question we overexpressed GDNF in the striatum of mice deficient for Ret in dopaminergic neurons and subsequently challenged these mice with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Strikingly, in this established PD mouse model, the absence of Ret completely abolished GDNF''s neuroprotective and regenerative effect on the midbrain dopaminergic system. This establishes Ret signaling as absolutely required for GDNF''s effects to prevent and compensate dopaminergic system degeneration and suggests Ret activation as the primary target of GDNF therapy in PD.Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is the founding member of the four ligands in the GDNF family, which belong to the transforming growth factor-β superfamily.¹ GDNF was characterized as a potent survival factor for many neurons in culture such as dopaminergic, motor, sympathetic, parasympathetic, sensory and enteric neurons.^{1, 2} In addition, in dopaminergic neuron cultures GDNF stimulates neuronal differentiation, neurite outgrowth, synapse formation and dopamine release.^{1, 2}As degeneration of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) represents a major hallmark of Parkinson disease (PD), the most common neurodegenerative movement disorder, GDNF has raised considerable interest as a therapeutic molecule for the treatment of PD.^{3, 4, 5} PD affects >2% of individuals over the age of 60 years, but no curative treatment is available to date, mainly due to a lack of understanding disease etiology.^{6, 7, 8} Preclinical studies in the established 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rodent and primate models of PD demonstrated a substantial neuroprotection and regeneration effect by striatal provided GDNF or its close relative neurturin.^{3, 4, 9} However, clinical phase II trials on PD patients using GDNF or neurturin did so far not convincingly recapitulate their beneficial effects on the dopaminergic system in humans most likely due to technical problems and the selection of advanced PD patients.^{10, 11, 12, 13}GDNF signaling is highly complex as this neurotrophic factor can bind to a variety of receptors, thus being able to induce pleiotropic effects. GDNF efficiently binds to the GPI-linked GDNF family receptor α1 (GFRα1).^{1, 2} It has been shown that the GDNF/GFRα1 complex can activate not only the canonical GDNF receptor Ret, a receptor tyrosine kinase which signals through the sarcoma protein (Src)/rat sarcoma (Ras)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, NF-κB (nuclear factor ''kappa-light-chain-enhancer'' of activated B cells), JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinases) and PLCγ (phospholipase γ) pathway, but also with other signaling inducing receptors.^{1, 2, 4, 5, 13} So far, at least four alternative GDNF receptors have been described which are all expressed in midbrain dopaminergic neurons, NCAM,^{14, 15} the integrins αV and βI,^{14, 16} syndecan 3¹⁷ and N-cadherin.¹⁸ Interestingly, Ret is not essential during pre- and postnatal development of the mouse dopaminergic system,^{19, 20, 21, 22, 23} but specifically required for the maintenance of SNpc dopaminergic neurons and their striatal innervation in aged mice.^{23, 24, 25} In contrast, GDNF seems most likely under physiological conditions to be dispensable during development and maintenance of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in mice, although conflicting results exist.^{26, 27, 28} Thus, Ret might be activated by a GDNF-independent mechanism to stimulate SNpc dopaminergic neuron survival. In addition, the in vivo function of the alternative GDNF receptors in the dopaminergic system under physiological and pathophysiological conditions, like PD, and their dependence on GDNF has not yet been addressed in detail. This raised the important question which GDNF receptor might be required to mediate GDNF''s reported neuroprotective and regenerative effect in the dopaminergic system in PD animal models and potentially in PD patients.^{5, 29}Previously, we showed in dopaminergic neuron-specific Ret knockout mice that Ret receptor loss does not result in a higher vulnerability of midbrain dopaminergic neurons against MPTP but to less resprouting of left over dopaminergic neuron axons in the striatum after MPTP intoxication.³⁰ In adult mice endogenous GDNF levels are rather low.^{26, 31} Therefore, we could not rule out in that study the possibility, that higher levels of GDNF—as also used in the clinical GDNF trials in PD patients—might have neuroprotective and regenerating effects even in the absence of the Ret receptor. Here we addressed now this question by viral overexpression of GDNF in MPTP-treated mice lacking expression of Ret again specifically in dopaminergic neurons.^{23, 30} We found that in the absence of Ret in dopaminergic neurons even a substantial overexpression of GDNF in the striatum does not have a neuroprotective and regenerative effect. Thus, despite the expression of alternative GDNF receptors on midbrain dopaminergic neurons, the presence of the canonical GDNF receptor Ret seems to be mandatory for mediating GDNF''s beneficial survival and axonal resprouting effect in these neurons.     

Intramitochondrial recruitment of endolysosomes mediates Smac degradation and constitutes a novel intrinsic apoptosis antagonizing function of XIAP E3 ligase

Intrinsic apoptosis involves BH3-only protein activation of Bax/Bak-mediated mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). Consequently, cytochrome c is released from the mitochondria to activate caspases, and Smac (second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases) to inhibit XIAP-mediated caspase suppression. Dysfunctional mitochondria can be targeted for lysosomal degradation via autophagy (mitophagy), or directly through mitochondria-derived vesicle transport. However, the extent of autophagy and lysosomal interactions with apoptotic mitochondria remains largely unknown. We describe here a novel pathway of endolysosomal processing of mitochondria, activated in response to canonical BH3-only proteins and mitochondrial depolarization. We report that expression of canonical BH3-only proteins, tBid, Bim_EL, Bik, Bad, and mitophagy receptor mutants of atypical BH3-only proteins, Bnip3 and Bnip3L/Nix, leads to prominent relocalization of endolysosomes into inner mitochondrial compartments, in a manner independent of mitophagy. As an upstream regulator, we identified the XIAP E3 ligase. In response to mitochondrial depolarization, XIAP actuates Bax-mediated MOMP, even in the absence of BH3-only protein signaling. Subsequently, in an E3 ligase-dependent manner, XIAP rapidly localizes inside all the mitochondria, and XIAP-mediated mitochondrial ubiquitylation catalyses interactions of Rab membrane targeting components Rabex-5 and Rep-1 (RFP-tagged Rab escort protein-1), and Rab5- and Rab7-positive endolysosomes, at and within mitochondrial membrane compartments. While XIAP-mediated MOMP permits delayed cytochrome c release, within the mitochondria XIAP selectively signals lysosome- and proteasome-associated degradation of its inhibitor Smac. These findings suggest a general mechanism to lower the mitochondrial apoptotic potential via intramitochondrial degradation of Smac.The intrinsic mitochondrial apoptotic pathway is required for efficient chemotherapeutic killing of cancer cells,¹ and is initiated through BH3-only protein activation of Bax/Bak-mediated mitochondrial outer membrane permeabilization (MOMP). MOMP releases cytochrome c to activate effector caspases.² Conversely, inhibitor of apoptosis protein (IAP) family members suppress initiator and effector caspases via direct binding and E3 ligase activities.^{3, 4, 5} Consequently, MOMP-induced release of Smac (second mitochondria-derived activator of caspases) from the mitochondria, to inhibit XIAP (X-chromosome-linked IAP)-mediated caspase suppression, can be required for apoptosis.⁶Autophagy, a lysosomal degradative mechanism undergoing extensive crosstalk with cell death and survival pathways,⁷ degrades damaged mitochondria in a process termed mitophagy.^{8, 9} Damaged mitochondria are targeted by lysosomal degradation through the recruitment of autophagy receptors to the outer mitochondrial membrane (OMM),⁸ or via delivery of mitochondrial-derived vesicles (MDVs) directly to the lysosome.¹⁰ The E3 ubiquitin ligase Parkin targets and ubiquitylates mitochondria, mediating both MDV degradation¹¹ and autophagy receptor-dependent mitophagy.^{12, 13} Alternatively, Fundc1¹⁴ and atypical BH3-only Nip family proteins Bnip3 and Bnip3L/Nix localize to the OMM and act as mitophagy receptors via their LC3-interacting region (LIR).^{15, 16, 17, 18} While targeting of damaged mitochondria suggests that mitophagy may counter apoptotic mitochondria, mitophagy occurs progressively over days,^{12, 14, 16, 17, 19} a rate that is likely insufficient to alter intracellular propagation of mitochondrial apoptosis, which can occur within minutes.^{20, 21} Indeed, Bnip3- and Fundc1-induced mitophagy have no direct effect on apoptosis,^{14, 18} and we determined that Bnip3-mediated mitophagy was cytoprotective if activated before apoptosis.¹⁷ While MDV delivery of mitochondria to lysosomes operates at a higher rate, minutes to hours,¹⁰ this process is regulated by Parkin and restricted to specific mitochondrial components.¹¹ Overall, for most intrinsic apoptosis scenarios it remains unknown whether lysosomal processing of mitochondria influences their capacity to activate or enhance apoptosis.Here, we used high-resolution imaging to evaluate the behavior of apoptosis, autophagy, lysosomal and ubiquitylation pathways in response to canonical (tBid, Bim_EL, Bik, Bad) and atypical (Bnip3, Bnip3L/Nix) BH3-only protein expression. We report that, in parallel to intrinsic apoptosis signaling, canonical BH3-only proteins induce the recruitment of endolysosomal machinery, in the absence of mitophagy. We determined that mitochondrial depolarization rapidly translocates the caspase inhibitor XIAP to the mitochondria. There, XIAP actuates MOMP within all mitochondria, concomitant with ubiquitylation at the OMM and inside OMM-bound regions, and triggers ubiquitin-dependent recruitment of Rab5 and its binding partners, as well as late endosomes into the mitochondria. Consequently, in a manner dependent on lysosome- and proteasome-activities, XIAP degrades its inhibitor Smac. We propose that in response to bioenergetic stress, the functional integration between lysosomes and mitochondria, mediated by XIAP and independent of autophagy, offers a novel mechanism to modulate mitochondrial apoptosis.     

Autophagy is a regulator of TGF-β1-induced fibrogenesis in primary human atrial myofibroblasts

Transforming growth factor-β₁ (TGF-β₁) is an important regulator of fibrogenesis in heart disease. In many other cellular systems, TGF-β₁ may also induce autophagy, but a link between its fibrogenic and autophagic effects is unknown. Thus we tested whether or not TGF-β₁-induced autophagy has a regulatory function on fibrosis in human atrial myofibroblasts (hATMyofbs). Primary hATMyofbs were treated with TGF-β₁ to assess for fibrogenic and autophagic responses. Using immunoblotting, immunofluorescence and transmission electron microscopic analyses, we found that TGF-β₁ promoted collagen type Iα2 and fibronectin synthesis in hATMyofbs and that this was paralleled by an increase in autophagic activation in these cells. Pharmacological inhibition of autophagy by bafilomycin-A1 and 3-methyladenine decreased the fibrotic response in hATMyofb cells. ATG7 knockdown in hATMyofbs and ATG5 knockout (mouse embryonic fibroblast) fibroblasts decreased the fibrotic effect of TGF-β₁ in experimental versus control cells. Furthermore, using a coronary artery ligation model of myocardial infarction in rats, we observed increases in the levels of protein markers of fibrosis, autophagy and Smad2 phosphorylation in whole scar tissue lysates. Immunohistochemistry for LC3β indicated the localization of punctate LC3β with vimentin (a mesenchymal-derived cell marker), ED-A fibronectin and phosphorylated Smad2. These results support the hypothesis that TGF-β₁-induced autophagy is required for the fibrogenic response in hATMyofbs.Interstitial fibrosis is common to many cardiovascular disease etiologies including myocardial infarction (MI),¹ diabetic cardiomyopathy² and hypertension.³ Fibrosis may arise due to maladaptive cardiac remodeling following injury and is a complex process resulting from activation of signaling pathways, such as TGF-β₁.⁴ TGF-β₁ signaling has broad-ranging effects that may affect cell growth, differentiation and the production of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins.^{5, 6} Elevated TGF-β₁ is observed in post-MI rat heart⁷ and is associated with fibroblast-to-myofibroblast phenoconversion and concomitant activation of canonical Smad signaling.⁸ The result is a proliferation of myofibroblasts, which then leads to inappropriate deposition of fibrillar collagens, impaired cardiac function and, ultimately, heart failure.^{9, 10}Autophagy is necessary for cellular homeostasis and is involved in organelle and protein turnover.^{11, 12, 13, 14} Autophagy aids in cell survival by providing primary materials, for example, amino acids and fatty acids for anabolic pathways during starvation conditions.^{15, 16} Alternatively, autophagy may be associated with apoptosis through autodigestive cellular processes, cellular infection with pathogens or extracellular stimuli.^{17, 18, 19, 20} The overall control of cardiac fibrosis is likely due to the complex functioning of an array of regulatory factors, but to date, there is little evidence linking autophagy with fibrogenesis in cardiac tissue.^{11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22}Recent studies have demonstrated that TGF-β₁ may not only promote autophagy in mouse fibroblasts and human tubular epithelial kidney cells^{15, 23, 24} but can also inhibit this process in fibroblasts extracted from human patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.²⁵ Moreover, it has recently been reported that autophagy can negatively¹⁵ and positively^{25, 26, 27} regulate the fibrotic process in different model cell systems. In this study, we have explored the putative link between autophagy and TGF-β₁-induced fibrogenesis in human atrial myofibroblasts (hATMyofbs) and in a model of MI rat heart.     

Protein kinase D1/2 is involved in the maturation of multivesicular bodies and secretion of exosomes in T and B lymphocytes

Multivesicular bodies (MVBs) are endocytic compartments that enclose intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) formed by inward budding from the limiting membrane of endosomes. In T lymphocytes, these ILV contain Fas ligand (FasL) and are secreted as ''lethal exosomes'' following activation-induced fusion of the MVB with the plasma membrane. Diacylglycerol (DAG) and diacylglycerol kinase α (DGKα) regulate MVB maturation and polarized traffic, as well as subsequent secretion of pro-apoptotic exosomes, but the molecular basis underlying these phenomena remains unclear. Here we identify protein kinase D (PKD) family members as DAG effectors involved in MVB genesis and secretion. We show that the inducible secretion of exosomes is enhanced when a constitutively active PKD1 mutant is expressed in T lymphocytes, whereas exosome secretion is impaired in PKD2-deficient mouse T lymphoblasts and in PKD1/3-null B cells. Analysis of PKD2-deficient T lymphoblasts showed the presence of large, immature MVB-like vesicles and demonstrated defects in cytotoxic activity and in activation-induced cell death. Using pharmacological and genetic tools, we show that DGKα regulates PKD1/2 subcellular localization and activation. Our studies demonstrate that PKD1/2 is a key regulator of MVB maturation and exosome secretion, and constitutes a mediator of the DGKα effect on MVB secretory traffic.Exosomes are nanovesicles that form as intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) inside multivesicular bodies (MVBs) and are then secreted by numerous cell types.¹ ILVs are generated by inward budding of late endosome limiting membrane in a precisely regulated maturation process.^{2, 3} Two main pathways are involved in MVB maturation.^{4, 5} In addition to the ESCRT (endosomal complex required for traffic) proteins,⁶ there is increasing evidence that lipids such as lyso-bisphosphatidic acid (LBPA),⁷ ceramides⁸ and diacylglycerol (DAG)⁹ contribute to this membrane invagination process.Exosomes participate in many biological processes related to T-cell receptor (TCR)-triggered immune responses, including T lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity and activation-induced cell death (AICD), antigen presentation and intercellular miRNA exchange.^{10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15} The discovery of exosome involvement in these responses increased interest in the regulation of exosome biogenesis and secretory traffic, with special attention to the contribution of lipids such as ceramide and DAG, as well as DAG-binding proteins.^{14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21} These studies suggest that positive and negative DAG regulators may control secretory traffic. By transforming DAG into phosphatidic acid (PA), diacylglycerol kinase α (DGKα) is essential for the negative control of DAG function in T lymphocytes.²² DGKα translocates transiently to the T-cell membrane after human muscarinic type 1 receptor (HM1R) triggering or to the immune synapse (IS) after TCR stimulation; at these subcellular locations, DGKα acts as a negative modulator of phospholipase C (PLC)-generated DAG.^{23, 24}The secretory vesicle pathway involves several DAG-controlled checkpoints at which DGKα may act; these include vesicle formation and fission at the trans-Golgi network (TGN), MVB maturation, as well as their transport, docking and fusion to the plasma membrane.^{9, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20} The molecular components that regulate some of these trafficking processes include protein kinase D (PKD) family members.²¹ PKD1 activity, for instance, regulates fission of transport vesicles from TGN via direct interaction with the pre-existing DAG pool at this site.¹⁹ The cytosolic serine/threonine kinases PKD1, PKD2 and PKD3^{(ref. 21)} are expressed in a wide range of cells, with PKD2 the most abundant isotype in T lymphocytes.^{25, 26} PKD have two DAG-binding domains (C1a and C1b) at the N terminus,²¹ which mediate PKD recruitment to cell membranes. Protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation at the PKD activation loop further promotes PKD autophosphorylation and activation.²⁷Based on our previous studies showing DGKα regulation of DAG in MVB formation and exosome secretion,^{9, 14, 28} and the identification of PKD1/2 association to MVB,¹⁴ we hypothesized that DGKα control of DAG mediates these events, at least in part, through PKD. Here we explored whether, in addition to its role in vesicle fission from TGN,¹⁹ PKD regulates other steps in the DAG-controlled secretory traffic pathway. Using PKD-deficient cell models, we analyzed the role of PKD1/2 in MVB formation and function, and demonstrate their implication in exosome secretory traffic.     

The Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 axis affects spindle assembly checkpoint robustness and sensitivity to antimicrotubule cancer drugs

To grant faithful chromosome segregation, the spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit until mitotic spindle assembly. An exceedingly prolonged mitosis, however, promotes cell death and by this means antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs), that impair spindle assembly, are believed to kill cancer cells. Despite malformed spindles, cancer cells can, however, slip through SAC, exit mitosis prematurely and resist killing. We show here that the Fcp1 phosphatase and Wee1, the cyclin B-dependent kinase (cdk) 1 inhibitory kinase, play a role for this slippage/resistance mechanism. During AMCD-induced prolonged mitosis, Fcp1-dependent Wee1 reactivation lowered cdk1 activity, weakening SAC-dependent mitotic arrest and leading to mitosis exit and survival. Conversely, genetic or chemical Wee1 inhibition strengthened the SAC, further extended mitosis, reduced antiapoptotic protein Mcl-1 to a minimum and potentiated killing in several, AMCD-treated cancer cell lines and primary human adult lymphoblastic leukemia cells. Thus, the Fcp1-Wee1-Cdk1 (FWC) axis affects SAC robustness and AMCDs sensitivity.The spindle assembly checkpoint (SAC) delays mitosis exit to coordinate anaphase onset with spindle assembly. To this end, SAC inhibits the ubiquitin ligase Anaphase-Promoting Complex/Cyclosome (APC/C) to prevent degradation of the anaphase inhibitor securin and cyclin B, the major mitotic cyclin B-dependent kinase 1 (cdk1) activator, until spindle assembly.¹ However, by yet poorly understood mechanisms, exceedingly prolonging mitosis translates into cell death induction.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Although mechanistic details are still missing on how activation of cell death pathways is linked to mitosis duration, prolongation of mitosis appears crucial for the ability of antimicrotubule cancer drugs (AMCDs) to kill cancer cells.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} These drugs, targeting microtubules, impede mitotic spindle assembly and delay mitosis exit by chronically activating the SAC. Use of these drugs is limited, however, by toxicity and resistance. A major mechanism for resistance is believed to reside in the ability of cancer cells to slip through the SAC and exit mitosis prematurely despite malformed spindles, thus resisting killing by limiting mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Under the AMCD treatment, cells either die in mitosis or exit mitosis, slipping through the SAC, without or abnormally dividing.^{2, 3, 4} Cells that exit mitosis either die at later stages or survive and stop dividing or proliferate, giving rise to resistance.^{2, 3, 4} Apart from a role for p53, what dictates cell fate is still unknown; however, it appears that the longer mitosis is protracted, the higher the chances for cell death pathway activation are.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7}Although SAC is not required per se for killing,⁶ preventing SAC adaptation should improve the efficacy of AMCD by increasing mitosis duration.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Therefore, further understanding of the mechanisms by which cells override SAC may help to improve the current AMCD therapy. Several kinases are known to activate and sustain SAC, and cdk1 itself appears to be of primary relevance.^{1, 8, 9} By studying mitosis exit and SAC resolution, we recently reported a role for the Fcp1 phosphatase to bring about cdk1 inactivation.^{10, 11} Among Fcp1 targets, we identified cyclin degradation pathway components, such as Cdc20, an APC/C co-activator, USP44, a deubiquitinating enzyme, and Wee1.^{10, 11} Wee1 is a crucial kinase that controls the G2 phase by performing inhibitory phosphorylation of cdk1 at tyr-15 (Y15-cdk1). Wee1 is also in a feedback relationship with cdk1 itself that, in turn, can phosphorylate and inhibit Wee1 in an autoamplification loop to promote the G2-to-M phase transition.¹² At mitosis exit, Fcp1 dephosphorylated Wee1 at threonine 239, a cdk1-dependent inhibitory phosphorylation, to dampen down the cdk1 autoamplification loop, and Cdc20 and USP44, to promote APC/C-dependent cyclin B degradation.^{10, 11, 12} In this study we analysed the Fcp1 relevance in SAC adaptation and AMCD sensitivity.