Effect of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists on serum follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone under conditions of singular follicle-stimulating hormone secretion

Previous work has indicated that in long-term ovariectomized rats a potent antagonist to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) suppressed serum luteinizing hormone (LH) more successfully than follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). The present studies examined whether the rise in serum FSH which occurs acutely after ovariectomy, or during the proestrous secondary surge, depends on GnRH. In Experiment A, rats were ovariectomized at 0800 h of metestrus and injected with (Ac-dehydro-Pro1, pCl-D-Phe2, D-Trp3,6, NaMeLeu7)-GnRH (Antag-I) at 1200 h of the same day, or 2 or 5 days later. Antag-I blocked the LH response completely, but only partially suppressed serum FSH levels. Experiment B tested a higher dose of a more potent antagonist [( Ac-3-Pro1, pF-D-Phe2, D-Trp3,6]-GnRH; Antag-II) injected at the time of ovariectomy. The analog suppressed serum LH by 79% and FSH by 30%. Experiment C examined the effect of Antag-II on the day of proestrus on the spontaneous secondary surge of FSH, as well as on a secondary FSH surge which can be induced by exogenous LH. Antag-II, given at 1200 h proestrus, blocked ovulation and the LH surge expected at 1830 h, as well as increases in serum FSH which occur at 1830 h and at 0400 h. Exogenous LH triggered a rise in FSH in rats suppressed by Antag-II. In Experiment D proestrous rats were injected with Antag-II at 1200 h and ovariectomized at 1530 h. By 0400 h the antag had suppressed FSH in controls, but in the ovariectomized rats, a vigorous FSH response occurred.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

A comparative study of the mechanism of action of luteinizing hormone and a gonadotropin releasing hormone analog on the ovary

The mechanism of action of a gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonistic analog ([D-Ala6]GnRH) on the rat ovary has been studied in comparison to similar effects of luteinizing hormone (LH). Stimulation of meiosis resumption in vitro in follicle-enclosed oocytes by both LH and [D-Ala6] GnRH, was blocked by elevated levels of cAMP as demonstrated when either dibutyryl cAMP or the phosphodiesterase inhibitor methylisobutylxanthine was present in the culture medium. In vivo, the prostaglandin synthase inhibitor indomethacin, which blocks LH-induced ovulation, also inhibited ovulation induced by the GnRH analog in hypophysectomized rats. On the other hand, the potent GnRH-antagonist [D-pGlu1, pClPhe2, D-Trp3,6] GnRH which blocked the stimulatory effect of the agonist on oocyte maturation and ovulation had no effect on LH action. It is concluded that while a GnRH-like peptide does not seem to mediate LH action on the ovarian follicles, both LH and GnRH agonist share some common mechanistic pathways at a post-receptor locus.     

Relationship between the preovulatory luteinizing hormone (LH) surge and androstenedione synthesis of preantral follicles in the cyclic hamster: detection by in vitro responses to LH

Preantral follicles of cyclic hamsters were isolated on proestrus, estrus and diestrus I, incubated for 3 h in 1 ml TC-199 containing 1 microgram ovine luteinizing hormone (LH) (NIH-S22), and the concentrations of progesterone (P), androstenedione (A) and estradiol (E2) determined by radioimmunoassay. At 0900-1000 h on proestrus (pre-LH surge) preantral follicles produced 2.4 +/- 0.3 ng A/follicle per 3 h, less than 100 pg E2/follicle and less than 250 pg P/follicle. At the peak of the LH surge (1500-1600 h) preantral follicles produced 1.8 +/- 0.2 ng P and 1.9 +/- 0.1 A and less than 100 pg E2/follicle. After the LH surge (1900-2000 h proestrus and 0900-1000 h estrus) preantral follicles were unable to produce A and E2 but produced 4.0 +/- 1.0 and 5.0 +/- 1.1 ng P/follicle, respectively. By 1500-1600 h estrus, the follicles produced 8.1 +/- 3.1 ng P/follicle but synthesized A (1.6 +/- 0.2 ng/follicle) and E2 (362 +/- 98 pg/follicle). On diestrus 1 (0900-1000 h), the large preantral-early antral follicles produced 1.9 +/- 0.3 ng A, 2.4 +/- 0.4 ng E2 and 0.7 +/- 0.2 ng P/follicle. Thus, there was a shift in steroidogenesis by preantral follicles from A to P coincident with the LH surge; then, a shift from P to A to E2 after the LH surge. The LH/follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) surges were blocked by administration of 6.5 mg phenobarbital (PB)/100 g BW at 1300 h proestrus. On Day 1 of delay (0900-1000 h) these follicles produced large quantities of A (2.2 +/- 0.2 ng/follicle) and small amounts of E2 (273 +/- 27 pg/follicle) but not P (less than 250 pg/follicle).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of adrenocorticotrophic hormone (ACTH1-24) on ovine pituitary gland responsiveness to exogenous pulsatile GnRH and oestradiol-induced LH release in vivo.

The present experiment was designed to determine if and how exogenous ACTH replicates the effects of stressors to delay the preovulatory LH surge in sheep. Twenty-four hours after oestrous synchronisation with prostaglandin in the breeding season, groups of 8-9 intact ewes were injected with 50 microg oestradiol benzoate (0 h) followed 8 h later by 3 injections of saline or GnRH (500 ng each, i.v.) at 2 h intervals (controls). Two further groups received an additional 'late' injection of ACTH (0.8 mg i.m.) 7.5 h after oestradiol, i.e., 0.5 h before the first saline or GnRH challenge. To examine if the duration of prior exposure to ACTH was important, another group of ewes was given ACTH 'early', i.e. 2.5 h before the first GnRH injection. The first GnRH injection produced a maximum LH response of 1.9+/-0.4 ng/ml which was significantly (p < 0.01) enhanced after the second and third GnRH challenge (7.1+/-1.5 ng/ml and 7.0+/-1.7 ng/ml, respectively; 'self-priming'). Late ACTH did not affect the LH response after the first GnRH challenge (1.9+/-0.4 vs. 1.8+/-0.3 ng/ml; p > 0.05) but decreased maximum LH concentrations after the second GnRH to 35% (7.1+/-1.5 vs. 4.6+/-1.1 ng/ml; p = 0.07) and to 40% after the third GnRH (7.0+/-1.7 vs. 4.0+/-0.8 ng/ml; p = 0.05). When ACTH was given early, 4.5 h before the second GnRH, there was no effect on this LH response suggesting that the effect decreases with time after ACTH administration. Concerning the oestradiol-induced LH surge, exogenous GnRH alone delayed the onset time (20.5+/-2.0 vs. 27.8+/-2.1 h; p > 0.05) and reduced the duration of the surge (8.5+/-0.9 vs. 6.7+/-0.6 h; p > 0.05). The onset of the LH surge was observed within 40 h after oestradiol on 29 out of 34 occasions in the saline +/- GnRH treated ewes compared to 11 out of 34 occasions (p < 0.05) when ACTH was also given, either late or early. In those ewes that did not have an LH surge by the end of sampling, plasma progesterone concentrations during the following oestrous cycle increased 2 days later suggesting a delay, not a complete blockade of the LH surge. In conclusion, we have revealed for the first time that ACTH reduces the GnRH self-priming effect in vivo and delays the LH surge, at least partially by direct effects at the pituitary gland.     

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone at estrus: luteinizing hormone, estradiol, and progesterone during the periestrual and postinsemination periods in dairy cattle

Administering gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) improved conception rates in our previous studies. Our objective was to determine if the effect of GnRH was mediated through serum luteinizing hormone (LH) and/or by altered secretion of serum progesterone (P) and estradiol-17 beta (E) during the periestrual and post-insemination periods. Cattle were given either GnRH (n = 54) or saline (n = 55) at 72 h and inseminated artificially (AI) 80 h after the second of two injections of either prostaglandin F2 alpha or its analog, cloprostenol. Progesterone and E were measured in blood serum collected during 3 wk after AI (estrus) from 60 females. Blood was collected for LH determinations via indwelling jugular cannulae from 14 cows and 11 heifers. Collections were taken every 4 h from 32 to 108 h after the second PGF injection (PGF-2) (periestrual period) and at more frequent intervals during 240 min after administration of GnRH (n = 18) or saline (n = 7). Ten females had a spontaneous preovulatory LH surge before GnRH treatment (GnRH-spontaneous), whereas GnRH induced the preovulatory LH surge in six females. A spontaneous LH surge appeared to be initiated in two heifers at or near the time of GnRH treatment (spontaneous and/or induced). The remaining seven cows had spontaneous LH surges with no subsequent change in LH after saline treatment. Serum P during the 21 days after estrus was lower (p less than 0.05) in both pregnant and nonpregnant (open) cattle treated previously with GnRH compared with saline. Serum P during the first week after estrus was greater (p less than 0.01) and increased (p less than 0.05) more rapidly in saline controls and in GnRH-spontaneous cattle than in those exhibiting GnRH-induced or GnRH-spontaneous and/or-induced surges of LH. Conception rate of cattle receiving GnRH was higher (p = 0.06) than that of saline-treated controls. These data suggest that GnRH treatment at insemination initiated the preovulatory LH surge in some cattle, but serum P in both pregnant and open cows was compromised during the luteal phase after GnRH treatment. Improved fertility may be associated with delayed or slowly rising concentrations of serum progesterone after ovulation.     

Acute stress may induce ovulation in women

Background  

This study aims to gather information either supporting or rejecting the hypothesis that acute stress may induce ovulation in women. The formulation of this hypothesis is based on 2 facts: 1) estrogen-primed postmenopausal or ovariectomized women display an adrenal-progesterone-induced ovulatory-like luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in response to exogenous adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) administration; and 2) women display multiple follicular waves during an interovulatory interval, and likely during pregnancy and lactation. Thus, acute stress may induce ovulation in women displaying appropriate serum levels of estradiol and one or more follicles large enough to respond to a non-midcycle LH surge.     

Luteinizing hormone requirements for ovulation in the rat.

Luteinizing hormone requirements for ovulation induction were studied in proestrous rats through detailed observation of the preovulatory surge, through various forms of LH injection under sodium pentobarbital blockade, and through estimation of LH uptake by the ovary. Blood LH levels in individual proestrous rats were obtained every 30 min and grouped according to their peak time (designated 0 h); mean LH levels higher than 7 and 5 ng/ml continued for 30 min and 2.5 h, respectively, the pituitary LH contents at 1400 and 2000 h on the day of proestrus were 2.1 and 0.7 micrograms, respectively, indicating that the amount of LH secreted during the surge was at least 1.4 micrograms. Single intravenous injections of 2 micrograms and 1 micrograms of pure rat LH (NIDDK-rLH-I-7; FSH and prolactin contaminations: 0.02% and less than 0.01%, respectively) to sodium pentobarbital-blocked rats induced ovulation in 4 out of 4 rats and 4 out of 6 rats, respectively, while 500 ng failed to induce ovulation in any (out of 7) rats. Two injections of 300 ng each with an interval of 20 min induced ovulation in 3 out of 8 rats, but if the interval was prolonged to between 30 and 120 min, 100% ovulation was obtained. Blood LH levels in these experiments indicated that a lower long-lasting LH level (about 5 ng/ml blood) is more important than a short, high level for ovulation induction. It was also shown that this level of LH could be given in separate doses if the interval was 30-120 min.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Responses of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone levels to exogenous gonadotropin-releasing hormone during the estrogen-induced LH surge in the ovariectomized rhesus monkey

Experiments were performed to study the responsiveness of the pituitary to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) during the dynamic changes in gonadotropin secretion associated with the estrogen-induced luteinizing hormone (LH) surge in the ovariectomized (OVX) rhesus monkey. Silastic capsules filled with estradiol-17-beta were implanted subcutaneously in ovariectomized rhesus monkeys, resulting in an initial lowering of circulating LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) concentrations followed by an LH-FSH surge. GnRH was injected intravenously just before estrogen implantation, during the negative feedback response and during the rising, the peak, and the declining phases of the LH surge. The LH and FSH responses during the negative feedback phase were as large as those before estrogen treatment (control responses). During the rising phase of the LH surge, the acute response to GnRH injection did not differ significantly from the control response, but the responses 60 and 120 min after injection were somewhat increased. During the declining phase of the LH surge, the pituitary was not responsive to exogenous GnRH, although LH probably continued to be secreted at this time since the LH surge decreased more slowly than predicted by the normal rate of disappearance of LH in the monkey. We conclude that an increased duration of response to GnRH may be an important part of the mechanism by which estrogen induces the LH surge, but we do not see evidence of increased sensitivity of the pituitary to GnRH as an acute releasing factor at that time.     

Suppression of gonadotropin secretion and prevention of ovulation in the rat by antiserum to synthetic gonadotropin-releasing hormone

Administration of an antiserum (0.10–0.25 ml/rat) to the synthetic decapeptide “luteinizing hormone releasing hormone” (LH-RH) suppressed the cyclic surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in proestrous rats and prevented ovulation; exogenous LH reversed the block of ovulation. Serum prolactin levels remained unaffected. In ovariectomized rats, the antiserum suppressed the elevated serum levels of both gonadotropins. These findings are compatible with the view that the synthetic decapeptide is identical with the natural hypothalamic hormone that regulates the secretion of both LH and FSH.     

Negative feedback as an obligatory antecedent to the estradiol-induced luteinizing hormone surge in ovariectomized pigs

In ovariectomized pigs, estradiol treatment induces a preovulatory-like luteinizing hormone (LH) surge, but only after serum LH concentrations are suppressed for 48 h. This inhibition of LH release is attributable in large part to inhibition of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) release. The present report examines the dependency of the estradiol-induced LH surge on this preceding phase of negative feedback. Ten ovariectomized gilts were given an i.m. injection of estradiol benzoate (10 micrograms/kg BW). Beginning at the time of estradiol treatment, 5 of these gilts received 1-microgram GnRH pulses i.v. every 45 min for 48 h, i.e. during the period of negative feedback. The remaining 5 control gilts received comparable infusions of vehicle. Estradiol induced the characteristic biphasic LH response in control gilts. On the other hand, the inhibitory LH response to estradiol was prevented and the ensuing LH surge was blocked in 4 of the 5 gilts given GnRH pulses during the negative feedback phase. These results indicate that suppressing release of GnRH and/or LH is an important antecedent to full expression of the LH surge in ovariectomized pigs. Assimilation of this observation with the existing literature provides novel insights into the neuroendocrine control of LH secretion in castrated and ovary-intact gilts.     

An alteration in the hypothalamic action of estradiol due to lack of progesterone exposure can cause follicular cysts in cattle

Many mammals, including cattle, can develop ovarian follicular cysts, but the physiological mechanisms leading to this condition remain undefined. We hypothesized that follicular cysts can develop because estradiol will induce a GnRH/LH surge on one occasion but progesterone exposure is required before another GnRH/LH surge can be induced by estradiol. In experiment 1, 14 cows were synchronized with an intravaginal progesterone insert (IPI) for 7 days, and prostaglandin F(2alpha) was given on the day of IPI removal. Estradiol benzoate (EB; 5 mg i.m.) was given 3 days before IPI removal to induce atresia of follicles. Cows were given a second EB treatment 1 day after IPI removal to induce a GnRH/LH surge in the absence of an ovulatory follicle. All cows had an LH surge following the second EB treatment, and 10 of 14 cows developed a large-follicle anovulatory condition (LFAC) that resembled follicular cysts. These LFAC cows were given a third EB treatment 15 days later, and none of the cows had an LH surge or ovulation. Cows were then either not treated (control, n = 5) or treated for 7 days with an IPI (n = 5) starting 7 days after the third EB injection. Cows were treated for a fourth time with 5 mg of EB 12 h after IPI removal. All IPI-treated, but no control, cows had an LH surge and ovulated in response to the estradiol challenge. In experiment 2, cows were induced to LFAC as in experiment 1 and were then randomly assigned to one of four treatments 1) IPI + EB, 2) IPI + GnRH (100 microg), 3) control + EB, and 4) control + GnRH. Control and IPI-treated cows had a similar LH surge and ovulation when treated with GnRH. In contrast, only IPI-treated cows had an LH surge following EB treatment. Thus, an initial GnRH/LH surge can be induced with high estradiol, but estradiol induction of a subsequent GnRH/LH surge requires exposure to progesterone. This effect is mediated by the hypothalamus, as evidenced by similar LH release in response to exogenous GnRH. This may represent the physiological condition that underlies ovarian follicular cysts.     

Influence of GnRH administration on timing of the LH surge and ovulation in dwarf goats

This study was conducted to determine whether or not exogenous gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) alters the timing or improves the synchrony of estrus, the LH surge, and ovulation following estrous synchronization in dwarf goats, and to assess the effects of season on these parameters. In January and June, estrus was synchronized in 12 Pygmy and Nigerian Dwarf goats with a 10-day progestagen sponge, 125 microg cloprostenol i.m. 48 h before sponge removal, and 300 IU equine chorionic gonadotrophin (eCG) i.m. at sponge removal. Six of the 12 goats were given 50 microg GnRH i.m. 24h after sponge removal. Onset of estrus was monitored using two males. Samples for plasma LH were collected at 2 h intervals beginning 22 h after sponge removal and ending at 48 h in January and at 58 h in June. Time of ovulation time was confirmed by laparoscopy at 36, 50, 60, and 74 h in January and at 50, 60, and 74 h in June. Administration of GnRH had no significant effect on the onset of estrus; however, it reduced the interval from sponge removal to the LH surge and improved the synchrony of the LH surge (P<0.05). Treatment with GnRH also reduced the interval from sponge removal to ovulation and improved the synchrony of ovulation (P<0.05). Season had a significant effect on the timing and the synchrony of estrus with and without GnRH treatment (P<0.05). A seasonal shift was also observed in the timing of the LH surge in the absence of GnRH treatment (P<0.05). Further research is required to determine the optimum time for GnRH administration and the minimum effective dose in dwarf goats.     

Induced ovulation and changes in pituitary responsiveness to continuous infusion of gonadotropin-releasing hormone during the ovarian cycle in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana

Chronic (2-4 days) constant-rate infusions of mammalian gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) were performed in female bullfrogs, Rana catesbeiana. The magnitude and temporal relationship of profiles of plasma follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and sex steroids [testosterone (T), estradiol-17 beta (E2) and progesterone (P)] during GnRH infusion were dependent on ovarian stage. However, in all females, the same biphasic increase in plasma gonadotropins was apparent and initial elevations in gonadotropins were accompanied by correlated increments in plasma T and E2. Complete pituitary "desensitization" to chronic GnRH infusion was not observed. Females in early follicular stages were relatively unresponsive to infusions of 1.0-10.0 micrograms/h GnRH; elevations in plasma LH were marginal and FSH was unchanged. Females with fully developed (preovulatory) ovaries were more responsive: infusion of 1.0 micrograms/h GnRH produced significant elevations in plasma LH by 2 h followed by even larger increases ("surges") after 12 h. This LH "surge" was preceded by a decline in plasma T and E2 and was accompanied by abrupt elevations in plasma P and by ovulation. Postovulatory females showed a more gradual and smaller increase in plasma LH. Infusion of GnRH in the female bullfrog establishes a clear relationship between pituitary responsiveness and the ovarian cycle not evident from acute GnRH injection; GnRH was most effective immediately before ovulation. These data are also the first to detail periovulatory changes in plasma gonadotropins and ovarian steroids in an amphibian.     

Decline in circulating estradiol during the periovulatory period is correlated with decreases in estradiol and androgen, and in messenger RNA for p450 aromatase and p450 17alpha-hydroxylase, in bovine preovulatory follicles

The preovulatory surge of gonadotropins induces meiotic maturation of the oocyte, the follicular/luteal phase shift in hormone production, and ovulation. This complex and rapid series of developmental changes is difficult to study in large mammals, such as primates and ruminants, because variability in the length of individual reproductive cycles makes it virtually impossible to predict the time of the LH surge. We have validated an experimental model for inducing the LH surge and ovulation in cattle and used it to study the sequence of changes in hormone secretion and some of the mechanisms of these changes. Luteolysis and a follicular phase were induced by injection of prostaglandin F(2alpha); injection of a GnRH analogue 36 h later induced an LH surge and ovulation. The LH surge peaked 2 h after GnRH and ovulation followed 22-31 h after the surge, consistent with the periovulatory interval in natural cycles. The ensuing luteal phase was normal, both in length and in concentrations of circulating progesterone. In experiment I, the uteroovarian effluent was collected, via cannulation of the vena cava, at frequent intervals relative to GnRH injection. Circulating estradiol declined progressively after GnRH, reaching a nadir by 8-10 h before ovulation, whereas concentrations of androstenedione and testosterone remained constant. In experiment II, preovulatory follicles were obtained at 0, 3.5, 6, 12, 18, or 24 h after GNRH: Concentrations of androgens and estradiol were measured in follicular fluid and medium from cultures of follicle wall (theca + granulosa cells); steady-state levels of mRNA for 17alpha-hydroxylase (17alphaOH) and P450 aromatase were measured in follicular tissue. Shortly after the LH surge (3.5 h post-GnRH) there was an acute increase in the capacity of follicular tissue to secrete androstenedione, but not estradiol, in vitro. Thereafter, both androgens and estradiol declined, both in follicular fluid and in medium collected from cultures of follicle wall. Levels of mRNA for 17alphaOH and aromatase in follicle wall decreased significantly by 6 h after GnRH, suggesting that declining levels of these enzymes underlie the decreases in steroid production by follicular cells. These results show that in cattle the preovulatory decrease in follicular estradiol production is mediated by redundant mechanisms, because androgen production and the capacity of granulosa cells to convert androgens to estradiol decline coordinately, in concert with decreases in mRNA for 17alphaOH and P450 aromatase.     

Gonadotropin surge induces two separate increases in messenger RNA for progesterone receptor in bovine preovulatory follicles

In mice deficient in progesterone receptor (PR), follicles of ovulatory size develop but fail to ovulate, providing evidence for an essential role for progesterone and PR in ovulation in mice. However, little is known about the expression and regulation of PR mRNA in preovulatory follicles of ruminant species. One objective of this study was to determine whether and when PR mRNA is expressed in bovine follicular cells during the periovulatory period. Luteolysis and the LH/FSH surge were induced with prostaglandin F(2alpha) and a GnRH analogue, respectively, and the preovulatory follicle was obtained at 0, 3.5, 6, 12, 18, or 24 h after GnRH treatment. RNase protection assays revealed a transient increase in levels of PR mRNA, which peaked at 6 h after GnRH and declined to the time 0 value by 12 h and a second increase at 24 h. The second objective was to investigate the mechanisms that regulate PR mRNA expression through in vitro studies on follicular cells of preovulatory follicles obtained before the LH/FSH surge. Theca and granulosa cells were isolated and cultured with or without a luteinizing dose of LH or FSH, progesterone, LH + progesterone, or LH + antiprogestin (RU486). Levels of PR mRNA increased in a time-dependent manner in granulosa cells cultured with LH or FSH and in theca cells cultured with LH, peaking at 10 h of culture. In contrast, progesterone (200 ng/ml) did not upregulate mRNA for its own receptor, and neither progesterone nor RU486 affected LH-stimulated PR mRNA accumulation. Furthermore, RU486 completely blocked LH-stimulated expression of oxytocin mRNA, indicating that PR induced by LH in vitro is functional. These results show that the gonadotropin surge induces a rapid and transient increase in expression of PR mRNA in both theca and granulosa cells of bovine periovulatory follicles followed by a second rise close to the time of ovulation and that the first increase in PR mRNA can be mimicked in vitro by gonadotropins but not by progesterone. These results suggest multiple and time-dependent roles for progesterone and PR in the regulation of periovulatory events in cattle.     

Ovarian and endocrine responses in the cat after coitus

LH release leading to ovulation was induced in 17 of 29 oestrous periods. The time of ovulation after coitus was determined by histological examination or by observation at laparotomy of ovaries in situ. Histological methods revealed that ovulation was complete in most follicles (9 of 13) at 32 h post coitum and in all follicles that were involved in the ovulatory process by 36 h. When laparotomy was used, no signs of preovulatory change were noted at the first observation time, 22 h post coitum, but in 4 cycles in which the entire process of ovulation was observed, the ovulatory process occurred between 23 and 28 h (3 follicles), 23 and 27 h (2 follicles), 25 and 28 h (3 follicles), and 25 and 29 h (3 follicles) post coitum. The first ovulatory process noted was complete at 25 h post coitum. In cats, LH release continued over a 16-h period before returning to baseline (long surge), values being 616 +/- 180 ng/ml at 1/2 h and 941 +/- 154 ng/ml at 2 h post coitum. In 6 cats the LH release pattern was limited to a 4-h period (short surge), values being 537 +/- 218 ng/ml at 1/2 h and 353 +/- 245 ng/ml plasma at 2 h and basal (49 +/- 18 ng/ml) by 4 h post coitum. Decreased secretion of oestrogen by follicles in animals undergoing ovulation was first observed at 16 h post coitum. It is concluded that coitus induces LH release within minutes in the cat and that ovulation begins about 24 h later and finishes by about 32 h post coitum. Only one coital input can cause LH release for as long as 16-20 h although shorter periods of LH release (4 h or less) can result in ovulation.     

Localization and hormonal regulation of ovarian production of histamine in the sheep

Concentrations of histamine were measured within the follicular wall, follicular fluid and ovarian interstitium throughout the periovulatory period in sheep. Histamine within follicular tissue declined after the onset of the preovulatory surge of luteinizing hormone (LH) and remained low until after ovulation, when levels then increased markedly. Alterations in histamine within the follicular wall were not reflected by corresponding changes within follicular fluid or ovarian interstitium. Release of histamine from tissue during short-term incubation was greatest for follicles obtained after ovulation, which was not influenced by presence of LH in the incubation medium. Luteinizing hormone caused depletion of stores of histamine from the wall of follicles collected before the preovulatory surge of LH. Histamine could act as a paracrine mediator in the follicular mechanisms of ovulation and(or) luteinization.     

Differential regulation of the secretion of luteinizing hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone around the time of ovulation in the bitch

Plasma concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) were determined 3-6 times daily in six Beagle bitches from the start of the follicular phase until 5 d after the estimated day of ovulation. The aim of the study was to gain more detailed information regarding the changes in and the temporal relation between these hormones around the time of ovulation. In all bitches, the pre-ovulatory LH surge was accompanied by a pre-ovulatory FSH surge. The mean duration of the pre-ovulatory FSH surge (110 +/- 8 h) was significantly longer than that of the pre-ovulatory LH surge (36 +/- 5 h). The FSH surge started concomitantly with the pre-ovulatory LH surge in four bitches, and 12 h before the start of the LH surge in the other two bitches. The pre-ovulatory LH surge had a bifurcated pattern in four bitches. The mean plasma LH concentration before (1.9 +/- 0.4 microg/L) and after (1.9 +/- 0.3 microg/L) the pre-ovulatory LH surge were similar. The mean plasma FSH concentration during the period 72-28 h before the pre-ovulatory LH surge (1.6 +/- 0.3 U/L) was lower (P < 0.001) than that during the period 100-144 h after the pre-ovulatory LH surge (3.1 +/- 0.2U/L). In conclusion, this study demonstrated concurrent pre-ovulatory surges of FSH and LH and provided more evidence for differential regulation of the secretion of FSH and LH.     

Pituitary response to repeated copulation and/or gonadotropin-releasing hormone administration in llamas and alpacas.

The response of the pituitary gland and ovary to repeated copulatory periods and/or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH, i.v. 1000 micrograms) administration was determined in llamas and alpacas. Eighty adult females (41 llamas and 39 alpacas with ovulatory follicles) were divided into three general groups for each species as follows: copulation (one or two copulations at either 6- or 24-h intervals) GnRH treatment (one or two treatments at either 6- or 24-h intervals), and combined treatment (copulation followed by GnRH treatment, or GnRH followed by copulation at either 6- or 24-h intervals). An additional control (nontreated) group was composed of 4 llamas and 4 alpacas. The first copulation or treatment with GnRH provoked LH release sufficient to cause ovulation in most of the females (alpacas, 89%; llamas, 92%); urinary pregnanediol glucuronide values, used to verify ovulation, were significantly elevated 48 h after copulation and/or GnRH treatment. A second stimulus, copulation or GnRH, provoked no LH response with concentrations similar to those in nontreated controls and in females not ovulating. Llamas and alpacas thus were refractory to a second copulatory or GnRH stimulus with regard to LH release for up to 24 h following an initial ovulatory release of LH.     

Gonadotropin secretion in ovariectomized ewes: effect of passive immunization against gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) and infusion of a GnRH agonist and estradiol

Gonadotropin secretion was examined in ovariectomized sheep after passive immunization against gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). Infusion of ovine anti-GnRH serum, but not control antiserum, rapidly depressed serum concentrations of luteinizing hormone (LH). The anti-GnRH-induced reduction in serum LH was reversed by circhoral (hourly) administration of a GnRH agonist that did not cross-react with the anti-GnRH serum. In contrast, passive immunization against GnRH led to only a modest reduction in serum concentrations of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH). Pulsatile delivery of the GnRH agonist did not influence serum concentrations of FSH. Continuous infusion of estradiol inhibited and then stimulated gonadotropin secretion in animals passively immunized against GnRH, with gonadotrope function driven by GnRH agonist. However, the magnitude of the positive feedback response was only 10% of the response noted in controls. These data indicate that the estradiol-induced surge of LH secretion in ovariectomized sheep is the product of estrogenic action at both hypothalamic and pituitary loci. Replacement of the endogenous GnRH pulse generator with an exogenous generator of GnRH-like pulses that were invariant in frequency and amplitude could not fully reestablish the preovulatory-like surge of LH induced by estradiol.