Heterobimetallic chloro bridgedcomplexes of (η:η−C10H16)-ruthenium(IV) with palladium(II), platinum(II), rhodium(III), iridium(III), copper(I) and rhodium(I)

Metathesis of [(η³:η³−C₁₀H₁₆)Ru(Cl) (μ−Cl)]₂ (1) with [R₃P) (Cl)M(μ-Cl)]₂ (M = Pd, Pt), [Me₂NCH₂C₆H₄Pd(μ-Cl)]₂ and [(OC)₂Rh(μ-Cl)]₂ affords the heterobimetallic chloro bridged complexes (η³:η³-C₁₀H₁₆) (Cl)Ru(μ-Cl)₂M(PR₃)(Cl) (M = Pd, Pt), (η³:η³-C₁₀H₁₆) (Cl)Ru(μ-Cl)₂PdC₆H₄CH₂NMe₂ and (η³:η³-C₁₀H₁₆) (Cl)Ru(μ-Cl)₂Rh(CO)₂, respectively. Complex 1 reacts with [Cp^*M(Cl) (μ-Cl)]₂ (M = Rh, Ir), [p-cymene Ru(Cl) (μ-Cl]₂ and [(Cy₃P)Cu(μ-Cl)]₂ to give an equilibrium of the heterobimetallic complexes and of educts. The structures of (η³:η³-C₁₀H₁₆)Ru(μ-Cl)₂Pd(PR₃) (Cl) (R = Et, Bu) and of one diastereoisomer of (η³:η³-C₁₀H₁₆)Ru(μ-Cl)₂IrCp^*(Cl) were determined by X-ray diffraction.     

Synthesis and reactivity of coordinatively unsaturated osmium and ruthenium stannyl complexes

Treatment of MHCl(CO)(PPh₃)₃ (M=Ru, Os) with (CH₂=CH)SnR₃ is a good general route to the coordinatively unsaturated osmium and ruthenium stannyl complexes M(SnR₃)Cl(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (1: M=Ru, R=Me; 2: M=Ru, R = n-butyl; 3: M=Ru, R = p-tolyl; 4: M=Os, R=Me). These coordinatively unsaturated complexes readily add CO and CN-p-tolyl to form the coordinatively saturated compounds M(SnR₃)Cl(CO)L(PPh₃)₂ (5: M=Ru, R=Me, L=CO; 6: M=;Ru, R = n-butyl, L=CO; 7: M=Ru, R = p-tolyl, L=CO; 8: M=Os, R=Me, L=CO; 9: M=Ru, R=Me, L=CN-p-tolyl; 10: M=Ru, R = n-butyl, L=CN-p-tolyl; 11: M=Os, R=Me, L=CN-p-tolyl). In addition, the chloride ligand in Ru(SnR₃)Cl(CO)(PPh₃)₂ proves to be labile and treatment with the potentially bidentate anionic ligands, dimethyldithiocarbamate or diethyldithiocarbamate, affords the coordinatively saturated compounds Ru(SnR₃)(η²-S₂CNR′₂)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (12: R=Me, R′ = Me; 13: R=Me, R′ = Et; 14: R = n-butyl, R′ = Me; 15: R = p-tolyl, R′ = Me; 16: R = p-tolyl, R′ = Et). Chloride is also displaced by carboxylates forming the six-coordinate compounds Ru(SnR₃)(η²-O₂CR′)(CO)(PPh₃)₂ (17: R=Me, R′ = H; 18: R=Me, R′ = Me; 19: R=Me, R′ = Ph; 20: R = n-butyl, R′ = Me; 21: R = p-tolyl, R′ = Me). IR and ¹H NMR spectral data for all the new compounds and ³¹P and ¹¹⁹Sn NMR spectral data for selected compounds are reported.     

Synthesis, solution behaviour and molecular structures of 16-electron closo-2-(Ph3P)-1-N,2-[μ-(η-CH2CH=Ch2)]-1-N-(σ-CH2CH=CH2)-2,1- RhCB10H10, the first η-olefinic monocarbon metallacarborane

The first η²-olefinic monocarbon metallacarbone closo-2-(Ph₃P)-1-N,2-[μ-(η²-CH₂CH=Ch₂)]-1-N-(σ-CH₂CH=CH₂)-2,1- RhCB₁₀H₁₀ has been prepared by the reaction of the dimeric anion {[Ph₃PRhB₁₀H₁₀CNH₂]₂-μ-H}⁻[PPN]⁺ with allyl bromide and characterized by a combination of spectroscopic methods and a single-crystal X-ray diffraction study. The variable temperature ¹H and ¹³C NMR studies revealed the fluxional behavior of the η²-olefinic complex in CD₂Cl₂ solution which is associated with the allyl side-chain exchange process.     

Coordination of a disubstituted alkene in a chelated d-metal-alkyl-alkene complex. Evidence for equilibrium between complexes with coordinated and free alkenes

Addition of (Cp*₂YH)₂ (4) to 2-methyl-1,4-pentadiene produced the yttrium-alkyl-alkene chelate complex Cp*₂YCH₂CH₂CH₂C(CH₃)=CH₂ (2) in which a disubstituted alkene is complexed to the metal center. Evidence for coordination of the alkene unit of 2 comes from the ¹H and ¹³C NMR chemical shifts of the vinyl units and from observation of nOe effects between Cp* protons and vinyl hydrogens. The disubstituted alkene ligand of 2 is weakly bound, and evidence for an equilibrium with substantial amounts of complex 3 with a free alkene was obtained from variable temperature ¹H NMR spectroscopy.     

Substitution kinetics of tetracarbonyl(η-alkene)ruthenium complexes: ALKENE = ethene and methyl acrylate

The kinetics in heptane of displacement of the alkene ligands ethene and methyl acrylate from Ru(CO)₄(η²-alkene) by P(OEt)₃ have been measured. The reactions occur by reversible dissociation of the alkenes, and activation parameters are compared with those for dissociation of CO from Ru(CO)₅ and for reactions of the corresponding Os complexes. A linear free energy relationship for ligand dissociation from Ru(CO)₅, Ru(CO)₄(C₂H₄) and Ru(CO)₄(MA) has a gradient close to unity, indicating virtually complete bond breaking in the transition states. Competition parameters for reactions of what is probably a solvated Ru(CO)₄S intermediate have been measured for the alkenes and P(OEt)₃, and for eleven other P-donor nucleophiles. Correlations with the electronic and steric properties of the P-donors show negligible dependence on the electron donicity of the nucleophiles and a small but significant dependence on their sizes. The sizes were quantified by Tolman cone angles or by ‘cone angle equivalents’ derived directly from Brown's ligand repulsion energies (E_r). These correlations compared with those, reported elsewhere, for reactions of the probably solvated intermediates Co₂(CO)₅(μ²-C₂Ph₂) and H₃Re₃(CO)₁₁ formed by ligand dissociative processes. In all cases the discrimination between nucleophiles by the intermediates is weak confirming their high reactivity and the borderline nature of the mechanisms of these bimolecular reactions between I_d and I_a.     

Macrocylic thioether-esters and thioether-thioesters and their palladium, platinum and silver complexes

Preparations by the high dilution method are reported for seven macrocyclic thioether-esters and thioether-thioesters (L1–;L7). Yields in these reactions between thiodiglycolyl dichloride and appropriate ,ω-diols or dithiols range from 10 to 51%. The compounds are characterized by ¹H and ¹³C NMR, IR and high resolution mass spectroscopy. They react with salts of Pd(II), Pt(II) and Ag(I) to form complexes of which MX₂·L2, (M = Pt, X = Cl; M = Pd, X = Cl, Br, I, SCN), [Pd(L2)₂][CF₃SO₃]₂·H₂O and [Ag(L5)₂][CF₃SO₃]·C₂H₅OH have been isolated and characterized by elemental analysis, IR and NMR spectroscopy. NMR spectra indicate reversible dissociation of the ligand occurs in dimethyl sulfoxide solvent for PdCl₂·L2 but not for the Pt analogue. For PtCl₂·L2, spectra indicate that the ligand is undergoing a conformational ‘wag’ about its pair of equivalent sulfurs. These remain bound to the metal while the unique sulfur moves from the apical position of the coordination sphere to a non-coordinated situation. Simultaneously, inversions at the bound sulfurs are occurring.     

Structure of Co2(CO)6(dppm) and Co2(CO)5(CHCO2Et)(dppm) (dppm = Ph2PCH2PPh2) and exchange reaction with CO: An experimental and computational study

Crystal structures of Co₂(CO)₆(dppm) (1) and Co₂(CO)₅(CHCO₂Et)(dppm) (2) (dppm = Ph₂PCH₂PPh₂) show asymmetry with respect to the orientation of the phenyl groups in 1 and owing to the bridging ethoxycarbonylcarbene ligand in 2. The effect of this asymmetry was recognized in the solid-state ³¹P NMR spectra of 1 and 2 and in the solid-state and solution ¹³C NMR spectra of 2 as well, but not in the solid-state and solution ¹³C NMR spectra of 1. In CH₂Cl₂ solution under an atmosphere of ¹³CO, the CO ligands of both complexes exchange with ¹³CO. The overall rate of ¹³CO exchange at 10 °C was found to be k_obs = 0.107 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ for 1 and k_obs = 0.243 × 10⁻³ s⁻¹ for 2. Two-layered ONIOM(B3LYP/6-31G(d):LSDA/LANL2MB) studies revealed fluxional behavior of 1 with rather small barriers of activation of the rearrangements. Four possible isomers have been computed for 2, close to each other energetically.     

Synthesis and characterization of polypyridineruthenium(II) complexes containing a linear ambidentate ligand, NCO or NCS, and reaction of isocyanato complexes under acidic conditions

Isocyanato and isothiocyanatopolypyridineruthenium complexes, [Ru(NCX)Y(bpy)(py)₂]ⁿ⁺ (bpy=2,2′-bipyridine, PY=pyridine; X=O, Y=NO₂ for n=0, and Y=py for n=1; X=S, Y=NO₂ for n=0, Y=NO for n=2, and Y=py for n=1), were synthesized by the reaction of polypyridineruthenium complexes with potassium cyanate or sodium thiocyanate salt. Isocyanatoruthenium(II) complexes, [Ru(NCO)(NO₂)(bpy)(py)₂] and [Ru(NCO)(bpy)(py)₃]⁺, react under acidic conditions to form the corresponding ammineruthenium complexes, [Ru(NO)(NH₃)(bpy)(py)₂]³⁺. The molecular structures of [Ru(NCO)(bpy)(py)₃]ClO₄, [Ru(NCS)(NO)(bpy)(py)₂](PF₆)₂ and [Ru(NO)(NH₃)(bpy)(py)₂](PF₆)₃ were determined by X-ray crystallography.     

Dialkyl-μ-ethylidene-μ-methylene-bis(pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)-dirhodium complexes: synthesis, spectra and decomposition reactions

The dialkyl-μ-ethylidene-μ-methylene-bis (pentamethylcyclopentadienyl)-dirhodium complexes [{(C₅Me₅)Rh}₂(μ-CH₂)(μ-CHMe) (R)₂] (4, P=Me; 5, Et; 6, n-Bu; 7, CH=CH₂; and 8, Z-CH=CHMe) have been prepared from RMgBr and [{(C₅Me₅)Rh}₂(μ-CH₂)(μ-CHMe)(X)₂] (2, X=Cl; 3, X=Br). Structures deduced from the NMR spectra show that the dialkyl complexes can exist in one trans and two cis forms. The decomposition of the dimethyl complex 4 is compared with that of the related di-μ-methylene complex; it reacts readily (30°C, MeCN solution) in the presence of one-electron oxidisers to give propene and methane and a little ethene and some butenes. Mass-spectrometric analysis of the ¹³C labelling in the organics originating from [{(C₅Me₅)Rh}₂(μ-CH₂)(μ-CHMe) (¹³CH₃)₂] shows that methane derives from the Rh---Me, ethene half from the ethylidene and half from coupling of Rh-methyl and a bridging methylene, while the propene arises almost entirely from the ethylidene and a rhodium methyl. The butenes come from coupling of ethylidene, methylene and a Rh-methyl, but only quite small amounts are formed; thus C+C coupling is the major decomposition path for the μ-ethylidenes, in contrast to the di-μ-methylene complexes where C+C+C coupling predominates. The divinyl complex [{(C₅Me₅)Rh}₂(μ-CH₂)(μ-CHMe) (CH=CH₂)₂] also underwent internal C+C coupling on reaction with AgBF₄ in MeCN to give a mixture of the allyl and methylallyl cations [(C₅Me₅)Rh(η³-CH₂CHCHR)(MeCN)]⁺(10, R=H; 11, R=Me).     

Substitution reaction mechanisms of dihydrido-ruthenium(II) phosphine complexes: hydribe basicity and molecular hydrogen intermediates

Kinetic and activation parameter data for the reactions of cct-Ru(H)₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂ (1) (cct = cis, cis, trans) in THF with thiols, CO and PPh₃ to give cct-RuH(SR)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂, Ru(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂ and Ru(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂, respectively, reveal a common, rate-determining step, the initial dissociation of H₂ from 1; the activated complex probably resembles the corresponding Ru(η²-H₂) species. Reaction of Ru(H)₂(dppm)₂ (2) (as a cis/trans mixture, DPPM = bis(diphenylphosphino)methane) with thiols initially generated cis- and trans- RuH(SR) (dppm)₂ with a rate that depends on both the type and concentration of thiol. The higher basicity of the hydride ligands in 2 (versus 1), which is demonstrated by deuterium exchange with CD₃OD, gives rise in the thiol reaction to an initial protonation step prior to loss of H₂. A species detected in the thiol reaction is possibly [RuH(η²-H₂ (dppm)₂]², the anticipated intermediate for this reaction and for the hydrogen exchange with alcohol. A longer reaction of 2 with PhCH₂SH gives solely cis-Ru(SCH₂Ph)₂(dppm)₂.     

Mixed-metal butterfly acetamidediato clusters derived from a highly reactive ruthenium oxo cluster: synthesis and characterization of [(PPh3)2N][MRu3(CO)12(η-μ3-NC(μ-O)CH3)], (M = Mn or Re)

Analogy with the isolable oxo cluster [Fe₃(CO)₉(μ₃-O)]²⁻, which is structurally interesting and synthetically useful, prompted the present attempt to synthesize its ruthenium analog. Although the high reactivity of [Ru₃(CO)₉(μ₃-O)]²⁻ (I) prevented its isolation, the reaction of this species with [M(CO)₃(NCCH₃)]⁺, where M = Mn or Re, yields [PPN][MRu₃(CO)₁₂(η²-μ₃-NC(μ-O)CH₃]⁻. The high nucleophilicity of the oxo ligand in [Ru₃(CO)₉(μ₃-O)]²⁻ (I) appears to be responsible for the conversion of acetonitrile to an acetamidediato ligand and for the instability of I. The crystal structure of [PPN][MnRu₃(CO)₁₂(η²-μ₃-NC(μ-O)CH₃)]] reveals a hinged butterfly array of metal atoms in which the acetamidediato ligand bridges the two wings with μ₃-N bonding to an Mn and two Ru atoms, and μ-O bonding to an Ru atom.     

Synthesis and solution behavior of the trinuclear palladium(II) unsaturated carboxylate complexes triangle-Pd3[μ-O2CC(R′) = CHMe]6 (R′ = Me, H): X-ray structure of palladium(II) tiglate (R′ = Me)

The first examples of binary palladium(II) derivatives of unsaturated carboxylic acids are reported. It was found that the interaction of Pd₃(μ-OAc)₆ with the ,β-unsaturated 1-methylcrotonic (tiglic) and crotonic acids leads to the corresponding carboxylates of composition Pd₃[μ-O₂CC(R′) = CHMe]₆, where R′ = Me (1) or H (2). The new compounds have been characterized by elemental analysis, solid and solution IR, ¹H and ¹³C NMR, and ESI mass spectrometry. The crystal structure of 1 has been determined. This molecule displays a central Pd₃ cyclic core with Pd–Pd distances of 3.093–3.171 Å. Each Pd–Pd bond is bridged by a pair of carboxylate ligands, one above and the other below the Pd₃ plane, providing a square planar coordination for each Pd atom in an approximate D_3h overall symmetry arrangement. Solution spectroscopic data show that the bridging η¹:η¹:μ₂ interaction of the carboxylates of 1 and 2 is readily displaced, with a change of the ligand to the terminal (η¹) coordination mode.     

The kinetics and energetics of formation of a molecular hydrogen complex involving a dinuclear ruthenium(II) centre

The reversible equilibrium conversion under H₂ of [RuCl(dppb) (μ-Cl)]₂ (1) to generate (η²-H₂) (dppb) (μ-Cl)₃RuCl(dppb) in CH₂Cl₂ (dppb = Ph₂P(CH₂)₄PPh₂) has been studied at 0–25 °C by UV-Vis and ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy, and by stoppe kinetics; the equilibrium constant and corresponding thermodynamic parameters, and the forward and reverse rate constants at 25 °C have been determined. A measured ΔH° value of 0 kJ mol⁻¹ allows for an estimation of an exothermicity of 60 kJ mol⁻¹ for binding an η²-H₂ at an Ru(II) centre; a ΔS° value of 60 J mol⁻¹ K⁻¹ indicates that in solution 1 contain s coordinated CH₂Cl₂. The kinetic and thermodynamic data are compared to those obtained from a previously studied hydrogenation of styrene catalyzed by 1. Preliminary findings on related systems containing Ph₂P(CH₂)₃PPh₂ and (C₆H₁₁)₂P(C₆H₁₁)₂ are also noted.     

Reactivity of cationic carbonyl/phosphine ruthenium(II) compounds

Cis(or trans)-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] react with two and one equivalents of AgBF₄ to give the recently reported [Ru(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂][BF₄]₂·CH₂Cl₂ (1) and novel [RuCl(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂][BF₄] · 1/2 CH₂Cl₂ (2), respectively. Cis-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] also reacts with two equivalents of AgBF₄ in the presence of CO to give [Ru(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂][BF₄]₂ (3). Reactions of 1 and 2 with NaOMe and CO at 1 atm produce the carbomethoxy species [Ru(COOMe)₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] (4) and [RuCl(COOMe)(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] (5), respectively. Complex 4 can also be formed from the reaction of 3 with NaOMe and CO. Alternatively, 4 is formed from cis-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] with NaOMe and CO at elevated pressure (10 atm); if these reactants are refluxed under 1 atm of CO, [Ru(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂] is the product. The reaction of [RuCl(CO)₃(PPh₃)₂][AlCl₄] with NaOMe provides an alternative route to the preparation of 5, but the product is contaminated with [RuCl₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂]. Compounds 1. 2, 4 and 5 have been characterised by IR, ¹H NMR and analysis, whilst the formulation of 3 is proposed from spectroscopic data only. This account also examines the reactivity of [Ru(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂][BF₄]₂ · CH₂Cl₂ with NaBH₄, conc. HCl, KI and, finally, MeCOONa in the presence of CO. The products of these reactions, namely cis-[RuH₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂], cis-[RuCl₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂], cis-[RuI₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂] and [Ru(OOCMe)₂(CO)₂(PPh₃)₂], have been identified by comparison of their spectra with previous literature.     

Molecular structures and some properties of tris(2-aminoethyl) amine cobalt(III) complexes with thiocarboxylato-O,S such as 3-mercaptopropionato, 2-mercaptoacetato and their derivatives

Cobalt(III) complexes with a thiolate or thioether ligand, t-[Co(mp)(tren)]⁺ (2), t-[Co(mtp)(tren)]²⁺ (1Me) and t-[Co(mta)(tren)]²⁺ (2Me), (mp = 3-mercaptopropionate, MA = 3-(methylthio)propionate and MTA = 2-(methylthio)acetate) have been prepared in aqueous solutions. The crystal structures of 1, 2, 1Me and 2Me were determined by X-ray diffraction methods. The crystal data are as follows, t-[Co(mp)(tren)]ClO₄ (1CIO₄): monoclinic, P2₁/n, A = 10.877(8), B = 11.570(4), c = 12.173(7) Å, β = 92.20(5)°, V = 1531(1) ų, Z = 4 and R = 0.060; t-[Co(ma)(tren)]Cl·3H₂O (2Cl·3H₂O): monoclinic, P2₁/n, a = 7.7688(8), B = 27.128(2), C = 7.858(1) Å, β = 100.63(1)°, V = 1627.7(3) ų, Z = 4 and R = 0.066; (+)₄₆₅^CD-t-[Co(mtp)(tren)](ClO₄)₂ ((+)₄₆₅^CD-1Me(ClO₄)₂): orthorhombic, P2₁2₁2₁, A = 10.6610(7), B = 11.746(1), C = 15.555(1) Å, V = 1947.9(3) ų, Z = 4 and R = 0.068; (+)₄₆₅^CD-t-[Co(mta)(tren)](ClO₄)₂ ((+)₄₆₅^CD-2Me(ClO₄)₂): orthorhombic, P2₁2₁2₁, a = 10.564(1), B = 11.375(1), C = 15.434(2) Å, V = 1854.7(4) ų, Z = 4 and R = 0.047. All central Co(III) atoms have approximately octahedral geometry, coordinated by four N, one O, and one S atoms. All of the complexes are only isomer, of which the sulfur atom in the didentate-O,S ligands are located at the trans position to the tertiary amine nitrogen atom of tren. 1 and 1Me contain six-membered chelate ring, and 2 and 2Me do five-membered chelate ring in the didentate ligand. The chirality of the asymmetric sulfur donor atom in (+)₄₆₅^CD-1Me is the S configuration and that in (+)₄₆₅^CD-2Me is the R one. The ¹H NMR, ¹³C NMR and electronic absorption spectral behaviors and electrochemical properties of the present complexes are discussed in relation to their stereochemistries.     

Olefin versus sulfur coordination of benzo[b]thiophene (BT) in Cp(CO)2Re(η:η-μ2-BT)Cr(CO)3

Reactions of Cr(CO)₃(η⁶-BT), in which the Cr is π-coordinated to the benzene ring of benzo[b]thiophene (BT), with Cp′(CO)₂Re(THF), where Cp′ = η⁵-C₅H₅ or η⁵-C₅Me₅, give the products Cp′(CO)₂Re(η²:η⁶-μ₂-BT)Cr(CO)₃ in which the Cr remains coordinated to the benzene ring and Re is bound to the C(2)=C(3) double bond. An X-ray diffraction study of Cp(CO)₂Re(η²:η⁶-μ₂-BT)Cr(CO)₃ (3) provides details of the geometry. This structure contrasts with that of the Cp′(CO)₂Re(BT) complexes that exist as mixtures of isomers in which the BT is coordinated to the Re through either the double bond (2,3-η²) or the sulfur (η¹(S)). Thus, the electron-withdrawing Cr(CO)₃ group in 3 stabilizes the 2,3-η² mode of BT coordination to the Cp′(CO)₂Re fragment. Implications of these results for catalytic hydrodesulfurization of BT are discussed. Crystal data for 3: triclinic, space group

Full-size image

.     

Mono-η complexes of chromium(II) and chromium(0). Electron demanding substituents, structural and spectroscopic data comparisons

Using thermal and photochemical methods a series of new chromium complexes has been prepared: (ν⁶-p-C₆H₄F₂)Cr(CO)₃; (ν⁶-C₆H₅CF₃)Cr(CO)₃; [m-C₆H₄(CF₃)₂]Cr(CO)₃; (ν⁶-C₆H₅F)Cr(CO)₂H(SiCl₃); (ν⁶-C₆H₅F)Cr(CO)₂(SiCl₃)₂; (p-C₆H₄F₂)Cr(CO)₂-H(SiCl₃); (C₆H₅CF₃)Cr(CO)₂H(SiCl₃(p-C₆H₄F₂)Cr(CO)₂(SiCl₃)₂; C₆H₅CF₃)Cr(CO)₂(SiCl₃)₂; [m-C₆H₄(CF₃)₂]Cr(CO)₂-H(SiCl₃); [m-C₆H₄(CF₃)₂]Cr(CO)₂(SiCl₃)₂. Two compounds were structurally characterized by X-ray diffraction. These data combined with IR and ¹H NMR have allowed assessment of some of the electronic and steric effects. The Cr-arene bond is considerably longer in the Cr(II) derivatives than in the Cr(0) species. Also the Cr center, as might be expected, is less electron rich in the Cr(II) dicarbonyl disilyl derivatives. The ν⁶-p-C₆H₄F₂ ligands are slightly folded so that the C---F carbons are moved further away from the Cr center. Comparison of structural and electronic effects is made with a series of similar chromium compounds reported in the literature. These new (arene)Cr(II) derivatives possess more labile ν⁶-arene ligands, which promise a rich chemistry at the chromium center.     

Synthesis, platinum(II) complexes and structural aspects of the new tetradentate phosphine cis,trans,cis-1,2,3,4-tetrakis(diphenylphosphino)cyclobutane

Several novel dimers of the composition [M₂Cl₄(trans-dppen)₂] (M=Ni (1), Pd (2), Pt (3)) containing trans-1,2-bis(diphenylphosphino)ethene (trans-dppen) have been prepared and characterized by X-ray diffraction methods, NMR spectroscopy (¹⁹⁵Pt{¹H}, ³¹P{¹H}), elemental analyses, and melting points. The intramolecular [2+2] photocycloaddition of the two diphosphine-bridges in 3 produces [Pt₂Cl₄(dppcb)] (4), where dppcb is the new tetradentate phosphine cis,trans,cis-1,2,3,4-tetrakis(diphenylphosphino)cyclobutane. Neither 1 nor the free diphosphine trans-dppen shows this reaction. In the case of 2 the photocycloaddition is slower than in 3. This difference can be explained by the shorter distance between the two aliphatic double bonds in 3 than in 2, but also different transition probabilities within ground and excited states of the used metals could be involved. Furthermore, variable-temperature ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy of 2 or 3 reveals a negative activation entropy of 2 for the [2+2] photocycloaddition, but a positive of 3. The removal of chloride from 4 by precipitating AgCl with AgBF₄, and subsequent treatment with 2,2′-bipyridine (bipy) or 1,10-phenanthroline (phen) leads to [Pt₂(dppcb)(bipy)₂](BF₄)₄ (5) and [Pt₂(dppcb)(phen)₂](BF₄)₄ (6), respectively. In an analogous reaction of 4 with PMe₂Ph or PMePh₂, [Pt₂(dppcb)(PMe₂Ph)₄](BF₄)₄ (7) and [Pt₂(dppcb)(PMePh₂)₄](BF₄)₄ (8) are formed. Complexes 1–8 show square–planar coordinations, where the compounds 4–8 have also been characterized by the above mentioned methods together with fast atom bombardment mass spectrometry (7, 8). The crystal structure of 4 reveals two conformations, which arise from an energetic competition between the sterical demands of dppcb and an ideal square–planar environment of Pt(II). The free tetraphosphine dppcb can be obtained easily from 4 by treatment with NaCN. It has been characterized fully by the above methods including ¹³C{¹H} and ¹H NMR spectroscopy. The X-ray structure analysis shows the pure MMMP-enantiomer in the solid crystal, which is therefore optically active. This chirality is induced by a conformation of dppcb, where all four PPh₂ groups are non-equivalent. Variable-temperature ³¹P{¹H} NMR spectroscopy of dppcb confirms this explanation, since the single signal at room temperature is split into two doublets at 183 K. The goal of this article is to demonstrate the facile production of a new tetradentate phosphine from a diphosphine precursor via Pt(II) used as a template.     

Preparation and crystal structure of trans-dihydroxo-[tetrakis(2,6-dichlorophenyl)porphinato]ruthenium(IV)·2toluene

Trans-dihydroxo-[tetrakis(2,6-dichlorophenyl)porphinato]ruthenium(IV) ([Ru(OH)₂(TDCPP)]) was prepared by meta-chloroperbenzoic acid oxidation of [Ru(CO)(TDCPP)] in dichloromethane-toluene, and its crystal structure is reported. Crystal data for [Ru(OH)₂(TDCPP)]·2toluene:C₄₄H₂₂N₄O₂Cl₈Ru·2C₇H₈, orthorhombic, space group Pbca a = 13.149(1), B = 19.893(2), C = 21.093(2)Å, U = 55.17.3(2) ų, Z = 4. The short axial Ru---O bond distance, 1.790(7) Å, is in the range expected for a double Ru(IV)-oxygen bond. Both hydroxo ligands are approximately located in the mean plane of two opposite dichlorophenyl groups. Full-matrix least-squares refinement of positional and thermal parameters, using 2368 unique reflections with F > 2.5 σ (F) led to R(F) = 0.063; R_w = 0.066.     

Kinetics and mechanism of the oxidation of ammineruthenium(II) complexes by bromine

The reactions of Ru(NH₃)₅py²⁺, Ru(NH₃)₄bpy²⁺, Ru₂(NH₃)₁₀pz⁵⁺, RuRh(NH₃)₁₀pz⁵⁺ and Ru(NH₃)₅pz²⁺ with bromine are first-order in ruthenium and first-order in bromine. The rates decrease with increasing bromide ion concentration and, except for Ru(NH₃)₅pz²⁺, are independent of hydrogen ion concentration. The reactions are postulated to proceed via outer-sphere, one-electron transfer from Ru(II) to Br₂ with the formation of Br₂⁻ as a reactive intermediate. The bromide inhibition is ascribed to the formation of Br₃⁻ which is unreactive in outer-sphere reactions because of the barrier imposed by the need to undergo reductive cleavage. The reaction of Ru(NH₃)₅pz²⁺ is inhibited by hydrogen ions. The hydrogen ion dependence shows that Ru(NH₃)₅pzH³⁺ has a pK_a of 2.49 and is at least 500 times less reactive than Ru(NH₃)₅pz²⁺. The reaction of Ru₂(NH₃)₁₀pz⁴⁺ with bromine is biphasic. The second phase has a rate identical to that of the Ru₂(NH₃)₁₀pz⁵⁺-Br₂ reaction. A detailed analysis shows that the reaction of Ru₂(NH₃)₁₀pz⁴⁺ with bromine proceeds by a sequence of one-electron steps, Br₂⁻ being produced as an intermediate. A linear free energy relationship between rate constants and equilibrium constants, obeyed for all the reactions studied, provides an estimate of 1.5 × 10² M⁻¹ s⁻¹ for the self-exchange rate constant of the Br₂/Br₂⁻ couple.