Structure-based mechanism of ligand binding for periplasmic solute-binding protein of the Bug family

Bug proteins form a large family of periplasmic solute-binding proteins well represented in beta-proteobacteria. They adopt a characteristic Venus flytrap fold with two globular domains bisected by a ligand-binding cleft. The structures of two liganded Bug proteins have revealed that the family is specific for carboxylated solutes, with a characteristic mode of binding involving two highly conserved beta strand-beta turn-alpha helix motifs originating from each domain. These two motifs form hydrogen bonds with a carboxylate group of the ligand, both directly and via conserved water molecules, and have thus been termed the carboxylate pincers. In both crystallized Bug proteins, the ligands were found enclosed between the two domains and inaccessible to solvent, suggesting an inter-domain hinge-bending motion upon ligand binding. We report here the first structures of an open, unliganded Bug protein and of the same protein with a citrate ion bound in the open cavity. One of the ligand carboxylate groups is bound to one half of the carboxylate pincers by the beta strand-beta turn-alpha helix motif from domain 1, and the citrate ion forms several additional interactions with domain 1. The ligand is accessible to solvent and has very few contacts with domain 2. In this open, liganded structure, the second part of the carboxylate pincers originating from domain 2 is not stabilized by ligand binding, and a loop replaces the beta turn. In the unliganded structure, both motifs of the carboxylate pincers are highly mobile, and neither of the two beta turns is formed. Thus, ligand recognition is performed by domain 1, with the carboxylate group serving as an initial anchoring point. Stabilization of the closed conformation requires proper interactions to be established with domain 2, and thus domain 2 discriminates between productively and non-productively bound ligands.     

Crystal structure of a glutamate/aspartate binding protein complexed with a glutamate molecule: structural basis of ligand specificity at atomic resolution

The crystal structure of a periplasmic l-aspartate/l-glutamate binding protein (DEBP) from Shigella flexneri complexed with an l-glutamate molecule has been determined and refined to an atomic resolution of 1.0 Å. There are two DEBP molecules in the asymmetric unit. The refined model contains 4462 non-hydrogen protein atoms, 730 water molecules, 2 bound glutamate molecules, and 2 Tris molecules from the buffer used in crystallization. The final R_cryst and R_free factors are 13.61% and 16.89%, respectively. The structure has root-mean-square deviations of 0.016 Å from standard bond lengths and 2.35° from standard bond angles.The DEBP molecule is composed of two similarly folded domains separated by the ligand binding region. Both domains contain a central five-stranded β-sheet that is surrounded by several α-helices. The two domains are linked by two antiparallel β-strands. The overall shape of DEBP is that of an ellipsoid approximately 55 Å × 45 Å × 40 Å in size.The binding of ligand to DEBP is achieved mostly through hydrogen bonds between the glutamate and side-chain and main-chain groups of DEBP. Side chains of residues Arg24, Ser72, Arg75, Ser90, and His164 anchor the deprotonated γ-carboxylate group of the glutamate with six hydrogen bonds. Side chains of Arg75 and Arg90 form salt bridges with the deprotonated α-carboxylate group, while the main-chain amide groups of Thr92 and Thr140 form hydrogen bonds with the same group. The positively charged α-amino group of the l-glutamate forms salt bridge interaction with the side-chain carboxylate group of Asp182 and hydrogen bond interaction with main-chain carbonyl oxygen of Ser90. In addition to these hydrogen bond and electrostatic interactions, other interactions may also play important roles. For example, the two methylene groups from the glutamate form van der Waals interactions with hydrophobic side chains of DEBP.Comparisons with several other periplasmic amino acid binding proteins indicate that DEBP residues involved in the binding of α-amino and α-carboxylate groups of the ligand and the pattern of hydrogen bond formation between these groups are very well conserved, but the binding pocket around the ligand side chain is not, leading to the specificity of DEBP. We have identified structural features of DEBP that determine its ability of binding glutamate and aspartate, two molecules with different sizes, but discriminating against very similar glutamine and asparagine molecules.     

Structural insights into the ligand binding domains of membrane bound guanylyl cyclases and natriuretic peptide receptors

Membrane bound guanylyl cyclases are single chain transmembrane receptors that produce the second messenger cGMP by either intra- or extracellular stimuli. This class of type I receptors contain an intracellular catalytic guanylyl cyclase domain, an adjacent kinase-like domain and an extracellular ligand binding domain though some receptors have their ligands yet to be identified. The most studied member is the atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) receptor, which is involved in blood pressure regulation. Extracellular ANP binding induces a conformational change thereby activating the pre-oligomerized receptor leading to the production of cGMP. The recent crystal structure of the dimerized hormone binding domain of the ANP receptor provides a first three-dimensional view of this domain and can serve as a basis to structurally analyze mutagenesis, cross-linking, and genetic studies of this class of receptors as well as a non-catalytic homolog, the clearance receptor. The fold of the ligand binding domain is that of a bilobal periplasmic binding protein (PBP) very similar to that of the Leu/Ile/Val binding protein, AmiC, multi-domain transmembrane metabotropic glutamate receptors, and several DNA binding proteins such as the lactose repressor. Unlike these structural homologs, the guanylyl cyclase receptors bind much larger molecules at a site seemingly remote from the usual small molecule binding site in periplasmic binding protein folds. Detailed comparisons with these structural homologs offer insights into mechanisms of signal transduction and allosteric regulation, and into the remarkable usage of the periplasmic binding protein fold in multi-domain receptors/proteins.     

Mechanisms for ligand binding to GluR0 ion channels: crystal structures of the glutamate and serine complexes and a closed apo state

High-resolution structures of the ligand binding core of GluR0, a glutamate receptor ion channel from Synechocystis PCC 6803, have been solved by X-ray diffraction. The GluR0 structures reveal homology with bacterial periplasmic binding proteins and the rat GluR2 AMPA subtype neurotransmitter receptor. The ligand binding site is formed by a cleft between two globular alpha/beta domains. L-Glutamate binds in an extended conformation, similar to that observed for glutamine binding protein (GlnBP). However, the L-glutamate gamma-carboxyl group interacts exclusively with Asn51 in domain 1, different from the interactions of ligand with domain 2 residues observed for GluR2 and GlnBP. To address how neutral amino acids activate GluR0 gating we solved the structure of the binding site complex with L-serine. This revealed solvent molecules acting as surrogate ligand atoms, such that the serine OH group makes solvent-mediated hydrogen bonds with Asn51. The structure of a ligand-free, closed-cleft conformation revealed an extensive hydrogen bond network mediated by solvent molecules. Equilibrium centrifugation analysis revealed dimerization of the GluR0 ligand binding core with a dissociation constant of 0.8 microM. In the crystal, a symmetrical dimer involving residues in domain 1 occurs along a crystallographic 2-fold axis and suggests that tetrameric glutamate receptor ion channels are assembled from dimers of dimers. We propose that ligand-induced conformational changes cause the ion channel to open as a result of an increase in domain 2 separation relative to the dimer interface.     

Insight into the stability of the hydrophobic binding proteins of Escherichia coli: assessing the proteins for use as biosensors

Spectroscopic methods were used to monitor the unfolding of the leucine specific (LS) and the leucine-isoleucine-valine (LIV) binding proteins. Our studies indicate that ligand-free protein undergoes a simple two-state unfolding, whereas the protein-ligand complex undergoes a three-state unfolding model. Ligand binding causes significant stabilization of both proteins. There is correlation between ligand hydrophobicity and protein stabilization: the most hydrophobic ligand, isoleucine, causes the most significant stabilization of LIV protein. A disulfide bond present in N-domain of both proteins makes a large contribution to the protein stability of these periplasmic binding receptors.     

The liver fatty acid binding protein - comparison of cavity properties of intracellular lipid-binding proteins

The crystal and solution structures of all of the intracellular lipid binding proteins (iLBPs) reveal a common -barrel framework with only small local perturbations. All existing evidence points to the binding cavity and a poorly delimited portal region as defining the function of each family member. The importance of local structure within the cavity appears to be its influence on binding affinity and specificity for the lipid. The portal region appears to be involved in the regulation of ligand exchange. Within the iLBP family, liver fatty acid binding protein or LFABP, has the unique property of binding two fatty acids within its internalized binding cavity rather than the commonly observed stoichiometry of one. Furthermore, LFABP will bind hydrophobic molecules larger than the ligands which will associate with other iLBPs. The crystal structure of LFABP contains two bound oleate molecules and provides the explanation for its unusual stoichiometry. One of the bound fatty acids is completely internalized and has its carboxylate interacting with an arginine and two serines. The second oleate represents an entirely new binding mode with the carboxylate on the surface of LFABP. The two oleates also interact with each other. Because of this interaction and its inner location, it appears the first oleate must be present before the second more external molecule is bound.     

On the molecular basis of the high affinity binding of basic amino acids to LAOBP,a periplasmic binding protein from Salmonella typhimurium

The rational designing of binding abilities in proteins requires an understanding of the relationship between structure and thermodynamics. However, our knowledge of the molecular origin of high‐affinity binding of ligands to proteins is still limited; such is the case for l ‐lysine–l ‐arginine–l ‐ornithine periplasmic binding protein (LAOBP), a periplasmic binding protein from Salmonella typhimurium that binds to l ‐arginine, l ‐lysine, and l ‐ornithine with nanomolar affinity and to l ‐histidine with micromolar affinity. Structural studies indicate that ligand binding induces a large conformational change in LAOBP. In this work, we studied the thermodynamics of l ‐histidine and l ‐arginine binding to LAOBP by isothermal titration calorimetry. For both ligands, the affinity is enthalpically driven, with a binding ΔCp of ~?300 cal mol^?1 K^?1, most of which arises from the burial of protein nonpolar surfaces that accompanies the conformational change. Osmotic stress measurements revealed that several water molecules become sequestered upon complex formation. In addition, LAOBP prefers positively charged ligands in their side chain. An energetic analysis shows that the protein acquires a thermodynamically equivalent state with both ligands. The 1000‐fold higher affinity of LAOBP for l ‐arginine as compared with l ‐histidine is mainly of enthalpic origin and can be ascribed to the formation of an extra pair of hydrogen bonds. Periplasmic binding proteins have evolved diverse energetic strategies for ligand recognition. STM4351, another arginine binding protein from Salmonella, shows an entropy‐driven micromolar affinity toward l ‐arginine. In contrast, our data show that LAOBP achieves nanomolar affinity for the same ligand through enthalpy optimization. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

The structure of the ferric siderophore binding protein FhuD complexed with gallichrome

Siderophore binding proteins play a key role in the uptake of iron in many gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. FhuD is a soluble periplasmic binding protein that transports ferrichrome and other hydroxamate siderophores. The crystal structure of FhuD from Escherichia coli in complex with the ferrichrome homolog gallichrome has been determined at 1.9 ? resolution, the first structure of a periplasmic binding protein involved in the uptake of siderophores. Gallichrome is held in a shallow pocket lined with aromatic groups; Arg and Tyr side chains interact directly with the hydroxamate moieties of the siderophore. FhuD possesses a novel fold, suggesting that its mechanisms of ligand binding and release are different from other structurally characterized periplasmic ligand binding proteins.     

Novel CalphaNN structural motif for protein recognition of phosphate ions

Phosphate is one of the most frequently exploited chemical moieties in nature, present in a wide range of naturally occurring and critically important small molecules. Several phosphate group recognition motifs have been found for a few narrow groups of proteins, but for many protein families and folds the mode of phosphate recognition remains unclear. Here, we have analyzed the structures of all fold-representative protein-ligand complexes listed in the FSSP database, regardless of whether the bound ligand included a phosphate group. Based on a phosphate-binding motif that we identified in pyridoxal phosphate binding proteins, we have identified a new anion-binding structural motif, CalphaNN, common to 104 fold-representative protein structures that belong to 62 different folds, of which 86% of the fold-representative structures (51 folds) bind phosphate or lone sulfate ions. This motif leads to a precise mode for phosphate group recognition forming a structure where atoms of the phosphate group occupy the most favorable stabilizing positions. The anion-binding CalphaNN motif is based only on main-chain atoms from three adjacent residues, has a conservative betaalphaalpha or betaalphabeta geometry, and recognizes the free phosphate (sulfate) ion as well as one or more phosphate groups in nucleotides and in a variety of cofactors. Moreover, the CalphaNN motif is positioned in functionally important regions of protein structures and often residues of the motif directly participate in the function of the protein.     

The crystal structure of a thermophilic glucose binding protein reveals adaptations that interconvert mono and di-saccharide binding sites

Periplasmic binding proteins (PBPs) comprise a protein superfamily that is involved in prokaryotic solute transport and chemotaxis. These proteins have been used to engineer reagentless biosensors to detect natural or non-natural ligands. There is considerable interest in obtaining very stable members of this superfamily from thermophilic bacteria to use as robust engineerable parts in biosensor development. Analysis of the recently determined genome sequence of Thermus thermophilus revealed the presence of more than 30 putative PBPs in this thermophile. One of these is annotated as a glucose binding protein (GBP) based on its genetic linkage to genes that are homologous to an ATP-binding cassette glucose transport system, although the PBP sequence is homologous to periplasmic maltose binding proteins (MBPs). Here we present the cloning, over-expression, characterization of cognate ligands, and determination of the X-ray crystal structure of this gene product. We find that it is a very stable (apo-protein Tm value is 100(+/- 2) degrees C; complexes 106(+/- 3) degrees C and 111(+/- 1) degrees C for glucose and galactose, respectively) glucose (Kd value is 0.08(+/- 0.03) microM) and galactose (Kd value is 0.94(+/- 0.04) microM) binding protein. Determination of the X-ray crystal structure revealed that this T. thermophilus glucose binding protein (ttGBP) is structurally homologous to MBPs rather than other GBPs. The di or tri-saccharide ligands in MBPs are accommodated in long relatively shallow grooves. In the ttGBP binding site, this groove is partially filled by two loops and an alpha-helix, which create a buried binding site that allows binding of only monosaccharides. Comparison of ttGBP and MBP provides a clear example of structural adaptations by which the size of ligand binding sites can be controlled in the PBP super family.     

Multiple binding modes for palmitate to barley lipid transfer protein facilitated by the presence of proline 12

Molecular dynamics simulations have been used to characterise the binding of the fatty acid ligand palmitate in the barley lipid transfer protein 1 (LTP) internal cavity. Two different palmitate binding modes (1 and 2), with similar protein–ligand interaction energies, have been identified using a variety of simulation strategies. These strategies include applying experimental protein–ligand atom–atom distance restraints during the simulation, or protonating the palmitate ligand, or using the vacuum GROMOS 54B7 force‐field parameter set for the ligand during the initial stages of the simulations. In both the binding modes identified the palmitate carboxylate head group hydrogen bonds with main chain amide groups in helix A, residues 4 to 19, of the protein. In binding mode 1 the hydrogen bonds are to Lys 11, Cys 13, and Leu 14 and in binding mode 2 to Thr 15, Tyr 16, Val 17, Ser 24 and also to the OH of Thr 15. In both cases palmitate binding exploits irregularity of the intrahelical hydrogen‐bonding pattern in helix A of barley LTP due to the presence of Pro 12. Simulations of two variants of barley LTP, namely the single mutant Pro12Val and the double mutant Pro12Val Pro70Val, show that Pro 12 is required for persistent palmitate binding in the LTP cavity. Overall, the work identifies key MD simulation approaches for characterizing the details of protein–ligand interactions in complexes where NMR data provide insufficient restraints.     

Ferric hydroxamate binding protein FhuD from Escherichia coli: mutants in conserved and non-conserved regions

Uptake of iron complexes into the Gram-negative bacterial cell requires highly specific outer membrane receptors and specific ATP-dependent (ATP-Binding-Cassette (ABC)) transport systems located in the inner membrane. The latter type of import system is characterized by a periplasmic binding protein (BP), integral membrane proteins, and membrane-associated ATP-hydrolyzing proteins. In Gram-positive bacteria lacking the periplasmic space, the binding proteins are lipoproteins tethered to the cytoplasmic membrane. To date, there is little structural information about the components of ABC transport systems involved in iron complex transport. The recently determined structure of the Escherichia coli periplasmic ferric siderophore binding protein FhuD is unique for an ABC transport system (Clarke et al. 2000). Unlike other BP's, FhuD has two domains connected by a long -helix. The ligand binds in a shallow pocket between the two domains. In vivo and in vitro analysis of single amino acid mutants of FhuD identified several residues that are important for proper functioning of the protein. In this study, the mutated residues were mapped to the protein structure to define special areas and specific amino acid residues in E. coli FhuD that are vital for correct protein function. A number of these important residues were localized in conserved regions according to a multiple sequence alignment of E. coli FhuD with other BP's that transport siderophores, heme, and vitamin B₁₂. The alignment and structure prediction of these polypeptides indicate that they form a distinct family of periplasmic binding proteins.     

A novel signal transduction protein: Combination of solute binding and tandem PAS‐like sensor domains in one polypeptide chain

We report the structural and biochemical characterization of a novel periplasmic ligand‐binding protein, Dret_0059, from Desulfohalobium retbaense DSM 5692, an organism isolated from Lake Retba, in Senegal. The structure of the protein consists of a unique combination of a periplasmic solute binding protein (SBP) domain at the N‐terminal and a tandem PAS‐like sensor domain at the C‐terminal region. SBP domains are found ubiquitously, and their best known function is in solute transport across membranes. PAS‐like sensor domains are commonly found in signal transduction proteins. These domains are widely observed as parts of many protein architectures and complexes but have not been observed previously within the same polypeptide chain. In the structure of Dret_0059, a ketoleucine moiety is bound to the SBP, whereas a cytosine molecule is bound in the distal PAS‐like domain of the tandem PAS‐like domain. Differential scanning flourimetry support the binding of ligands observed in the crystal structure. There is significant interaction between the SBP and tandem PAS‐like domains, and it is possible that the binding of one ligand could have an effect on the binding of the other. We uncovered three other proteins with this structural architecture in the non‐redundant sequence data base, and predict that they too bind the same substrates. The genomic context of this protein did not offer any clues for its function. We did not find any biological process in which the two observed ligands are coupled. The protein Dret_0059 could be involved in either signal transduction or solute transport.     

The periplasmic binding protein of a tripartite tricarboxylate transporter is involved in signal transduction

A new type of solute importer has been identified recently in various bacterial genera and called the tripartite tricarboxylate transporter (TTT). TTTs consist of two cytoplasmic membrane proteins and a periplasmic solute-binding protein. In the whooping cough agent Bordetella pertussis, a TTT system that has been called BctCBA mediates the uptake of citrate, with BctA and BctB being the membrane components and BctC, the periplasmic protein. Here, we describe that the expression of the bctCBA operon is induced by the presence of citrate in the milieu. The signalling cascade involves both BctC and the signal transduction two-component system BctDE, encoded by an operon adjacent to bctCBA. Furthermore, two-hybrid analyses and affinity chromatography experiments indicated that citrate-liganded BctC interacts with the periplasmic domain of the sensor protein, BctE. Thus, BctC is part of the signalling cascade leading to upregulation of the transporter operon in the presence of its solute, a new function for periplasmic binding proteins of TT transporters.     

Ligand binding specificity of the Escherichia coli periplasmic histidine binding protein,HisJ

The HisJ protein from Escherichia coli and related Gram negative bacteria is the periplasmic component of a bacterial ATP‐cassette (ABC) transporter system. Together these proteins form a transmembrane complex that can take up L‐histidine from the environment and translocate it into the cytosol. We have studied the specificity of HisJ for binding L‐His and many related naturally occurring compounds. Our data confirm that L‐His is the preferred ligand, but that 1‐methyl‐L‐His and 3‐methyl‐L‐His can also bind, while the dipeptide carnosine binds weakly and D‐histidine and the histidine degradation products, histamine, urocanic acid and imidazole do not bind. L‐Arg, homo‐L‐Arg, and post‐translationally modified methylated Arg‐analogs also bind with reasonable avidity, with the exception of symmetric dimethylated‐L‐Arg. In contrast, L‐Lys and L‐Orn have considerably weaker interactions with HisJ and methylated and acetylated Lys variants show relatively poor binding. It was also observed that the carboxylate group of these amino acids and their variants was very important for proper recognition of the ligand. Taken together our results are a key step towards designing HisJ as a specific protein‐based reagentless biosensor.     

Possible role for ligand binding of histidine 81 in the second transmembrane domain of the rat prostaglandin F2alpha receptor

For the five principal prostanoids PGD2, PGE2, PGF2alpha, prostacyclin and thromboxane A2 eight receptors have been identified that belong to the family of G-protein-coupled receptors. They display an overall homology of merely 30%. However, single amino acids in the transmembrane domains such as an Arg in the seventh transmembrane domain are highly conserved. This Arg has been identified as part of the ligand binding pocket. It interacts with the carboxyl group of the prostanoid. The aim of the current study was to analyze the potential role in ligand binding of His-81 in the second transmembrane domain of the rat PGF2alpha receptor, which is conserved among all PGF2alpha receptors from different species. Molecular modeling suggested that this residue is located in close proximity to the ligand binding pocket Arg 291 in the 7th transmembrane domain. The His81 (H) was exchanged by site-directed mutagenesis to Gln (Q), Asp (D), Arg (R), Ala (A) and Gly (G). The receptor molecules were N-terminally extended by a Flag epitope for immunological detection. All mutant proteins were expressed at levels between 50% and 80% of the wild type construct. The H81Q and H81D receptor bound PGF2alpha with 2-fold and 25-fold lower affinity, respectively, than the wild type receptor. Membranes of cells expressing the H81R, H81A or H81G mutants did not bind significant amounts of PGF2alpha. Wild type receptor and H81Q showed a shallow pH optimum for PGF2alpha binding around pH 5.5 with almost no reduction of binding at higher pH. In contrast the H81D mutant bound PGF2alpha with a sharp optimum at pH 4.5, a pH at which the Asp side chain is partially undissociated and may serve as a hydrogen bond donor as do His and Gln at higher pH values. The data indicate that the His-81 in the second transmembrane domain of the PGF2alpha receptor in concert with Arg-291 in the seventh transmembrane domain may be involved in ligand binding, most likely not by ionic interaction with the prostaglandin's carboxyl group but rather as a hydrogen bond donor.     

Automatic identification and representation of protein binding sites for molecular docking.

Molecular docking is a popular way to screen for novel drug compounds. The method involves aligning small molecules to a protein structure and estimating their binding affinity. To do this rapidly for tens of thousands of molecules requires an effective representation of the binding region of the target protein. This paper presents an algorithm for representing a protein's binding site in a way that is specifically suited to molecular docking applications. Initially the protein's surface is coated with a collection of molecular fragments that could potentially interact with the protein. Each fragment, or probe, serves as a potential alignment point for atoms in a ligand, and is scored to represent that probe's affinity for the protein. Probes are then clustered by accumulating their affinities, where high affinity clusters are identified as being the "stickiest" portions of the protein surface. The stickiest cluster is used as a computational binding "pocket" for docking. This method of site identification was tested on a number of ligand-protein complexes; in each case the pocket constructed by the algorithm coincided with the known ligand binding site. Successful docking experiments demonstrated the effectiveness of the probe representation.