Alzheimer's disease-related amyloid-β induces synaptotoxicity in human iPS cell-derived neurons

Human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons have been proposed to be a highly valuable cellular model for studying the pathomechanisms of Alzheimer''s disease (AD). Studies employing patient-specific human iPSCs as models of familial and sporadic forms of AD described elevated levels of AD-related amyloid-β (Aβ). However, none of the present AD iPSC studies could recapitulate the synaptotoxic actions of Aβ, which are crucial early events in a cascade that eventually leads to vast brain degeneration. Here we established highly reproducible, human iPSC-derived cortical cultures as a cellular model to study the synaptotoxic effects of Aβ. We developed a highly efficient immunopurification procedure yielding immature neurons that express markers of deep layer cortical pyramidal neurons and GABAergic interneurons. Upon long-term cultivation, purified cells differentiated into mature neurons exhibiting the generation of action potentials and excitatory glutamatergic and inhibitory GABAergic synapses. Most interestingly, these iPSC-derived human neurons were strongly susceptible to the synaptotoxic actions of Aβ. Application of Aβ for 8 days led to a reduction in the overall FM4–64 and vGlut1 staining of vesicles in neurites, indicating a loss of vesicle clusters. A selective analysis of presynaptic vesicle clusters on dendrites did not reveal a significant change, thus suggesting that Aβ impaired axonal vesicle clusters. In addition, electrophysiological patch-clamp recordings of AMPA receptor-mediated miniature EPSCs revealed an Aβ-induced reduction in amplitudes, indicating an impairment of postsynaptic AMPA receptors. A loss of postsynaptic AMPA receptor clusters was confirmed by immunocytochemical stainings for GluA1. Incubation with Aβ for 8 days did not result in a significant loss of neurites or cell death. In summary, we describe a highly reproducible cellular AD model based on human iPSC-derived cortical neurons that enables the mechanistic analysis of Aβ-induced synaptic pathomechanisms and the development of novel therapeutic approaches.In Alzheimer''s disease (AD), synapse damage and synapse loss are thought to underlie cognitive deficits.¹ Oligomers of the amyloid-β (Aβ) peptide appear to induce synaptic failure as an early event in the etiology of AD.^{2, 3, 4} However, despite its well-established synapse-impairing effects in rodent models,^{5, 6, 7} the synaptotoxic actions of Aβ most relevant for the human disease have not been identified in a human model system. Several studies have investigated the synaptotoxic effects of Aβ in cultured rodent neurons and in transgenic mouse models revealing a multitude of potential mechanisms affecting synapses. Postsynaptic Aβ actions result in the loss of functional (α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid (AMPA)-type) glutamate receptors,^{8, 9, 10} involve long-term depression-like mechanisms,^{9, 11, 12} and lead to the degradation of the entire postsynapse (dendritic spines).^{9, 11, 13} In addition, several distinct presynaptic Aβ actions on the synaptic vesicle cycle have been described.^{10, 14} Furthermore, Aβ-induced impairments of axonal transport regulation and Aβ-induced axon degeneration have been found in rodent neurons.^{15, 16, 17} This puzzling diversity of Aβ-induced synapse-related defects raises the question whether all of them are involved in the early pathomechanisms of human AD.In addition to well-established animal systems, the modelling of human neurological disease pathologies by human induced pluripotent stem cell (hiPSC) technology¹⁸ has been proposed as an innovative approach.^{19, 20, 21} The in vitro differentiation of hiPSCs to excitable neurons has been reported using a variety of protocols.^{22, 23, 24} However, quantitative analysis of both functional glutamatergic and GABAergic synapses has been difficult to achieve.^{19, 25, 26} In addition to studying the functional properties of iPSC-derived human neurons from healthy individuals, the in vitro differentiation of patient-derived iPSCs has been used to model complex neurodevelopmental and neurodegenerative diseases.^{19, 27, 28} Recently, iPSCs derived from AD patients have been reported to exhibit increased secretion of Aβ upon in vitro neuronal differentiation; however, neither a loss of synapses nor an impairment of synapse function was detected.^{21, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33} Here we describe a hiPSC-based, carefully optimized in vitro differentiation protocol, including a novel immunopanning step, which enabled us to study the deleterious effects of application of Aβ on human cortical neurons and on human synapses.     

Heme oxygenase-1 protects against Alzheimer's amyloid-β1-42-induced toxicity via carbon monoxide production

Heme oxygenase-1 (HO-1), an inducible enzyme up-regulated in Alzheimer''s disease, catabolises heme to biliverdin, Fe²⁺ and carbon monoxide (CO). CO can protect neurones from oxidative stress-induced apoptosis by inhibiting Kv2.1 channels, which mediates cellular K⁺ efflux as an early step in the apoptotic cascade. Since apoptosis contributes to the neuronal loss associated with amyloid β peptide (Aβ) toxicity in AD, we investigated the protective effects of HO-1 and CO against Aβ_1-42 toxicity in SH-SY5Y cells, employing cells stably transfected with empty vector or expressing the cellular prion protein, PrP^c, and rat primary hippocampal neurons. Aβ_1-42 (containing protofibrils) caused a concentration-dependent decrease in cell viability, attributable at least in part to induction of apoptosis, with the PrP^c-expressing cells showing greater susceptibility to Aβ_1-42 toxicity. Pharmacological induction or genetic over-expression of HO-1 significantly ameliorated the effects of Aβ_1-42. The CO-donor CORM-2 protected cells against Aβ_1-42 toxicity in a concentration-dependent manner. Electrophysiological studies revealed no differences in the outward current pre- and post-Aβ_1-42 treatment suggesting that K⁺ channel activity is unaffected in these cells. Instead, Aβ toxicity was reduced by the L-type Ca²⁺ channel blocker nifedipine, and by the CaMKKII inhibitor, STO-609. Aβ also activated the downstream kinase, AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMPK). CO prevented this activation of AMPK. Our findings indicate that HO-1 protects against Aβ toxicity via production of CO. Protection does not arise from inhibition of apoptosis-associated K⁺ efflux, but rather by inhibition of AMPK activation, which has been recently implicated in the toxic effects of Aβ. These data provide a novel, beneficial effect of CO which adds to its growing potential as a therapeutic agent.Amongst the earliest of events leading to neuronal loss in Alzheimer''s disease (AD) is the loss of functional synapses,^{1, 2, 3} apparent long before deposition of amyloid β peptide (Aβ)-containing plaques.⁴ Although other parts of the neurone (e.g. the axon or soma) appear intact, their health at this early stage of disease progression is not clear. However, neurones ultimately die in AD and there is clear evidence that numerous events indicative of apoptosis occur even at early stages of disease progression.^{5, 6, 7, 8} Thus, targeting of apoptotic mechanisms may be of therapeutic value in AD as well as in other neurodegenerative disorders. Furthermore, apoptosis is established as a mechanism of neuronal loss following other types of pathological stresses including ischemia associated with stroke,⁹ which can predispose individuals to the development of AD.^{10, 11, 12}Apoptosis is strongly influenced by intracellular K⁺ levels¹³ which regulate caspase activation, mitochondrial membrane potential and volume, osmolarity and cell volume.^{13, 14} K⁺ loss via K⁺ channels is a key early stage in apoptosis,^{15, 16, 17, 18, 19} and K⁺ channel inhibitors can protect against apoptosis triggered by numerous insults including oxidative stress.^{20, 21} Evidence suggests a particularly important role for the voltage-gated channel Kv2.1 in this process: expression of dominant negative Kv2.1 constructs (thus lacking functional Kv2.1 channels) protects against oxidant-induced apoptosis, and over-expression of Kv2.1 increases susceptibility to apoptosis.^{22, 23} Pro-apoptotic agents cause a rapid increase in the surface expression of Kv2.1 channels,²⁴ but whether or not this occurs in AD remains to be determined. Alternative pathways recently reported to promote cell death include activation of the AMP-dependent protein kinase (AMP kinase) which can act either as a Tau kinase²⁵ or to inhibit the mTOR pathway²⁶ and thus contribute to neurodegeneration.Heme oxygenases (HO) are enzymes widely distributed throughout the body. In the central nervous system, HO-2 is constitutively expressed in neurones and astrocytes, while HO-1 is inducible in both cell types.^{27, 28, 29, 30} Both HO-1 and HO-2 break down heme to liberate biliverdin, ferrous iron (Fe²⁺) and carbon monoxide (CO). This catalysis is of biological significance since it is crucial to iron and bile metabolism, and also generates a highly effective antioxidant in bilirubin (from biliverdin via bilirubin reductase). Numerous stimuli can induce HO-1 gene expression,³¹ including oxidative stress³² and Aβ peptides.³³ Importantly, HO-1 is strikingly up-regulated in AD patients, a finding considered indicative of oxidative stress.^{27, 34, 35} Induction of HO-1 is clearly a neuroprotective response (although in some cases can exert detrimental effects²⁷). However, there is growing evidence that CO can be neuroprotective, for example against the damage of focal ischemia.³⁶ Our recent studies have demonstrated that CO provides protection against oxidant-induced apoptosis by selectively inhibiting Kv2.1.^{23, 37} In the present study, we have investigated whether HO-1, or its product CO, can provide protection against Aβ-induced toxicity in the human neuroblastoma, SH-SY5Y, and in rat primary hippocampal neurones, and whether this involves regulation of K⁺ channels. We show that both HO-1 and CO protect cells against the toxicity of protofibrillar Aβ_1-42 but that protection does not arise from inhibition of apoptosis-associated K⁺ efflux, but rather by inhibition of AMPK activation.     

TRAF2 is a biologically important necroptosis suppressor

Tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) triggers necroptotic cell death through an intracellular signaling complex containing receptor-interacting protein kinase (RIPK) 1 and RIPK3, called the necrosome. RIPK1 phosphorylates RIPK3, which phosphorylates the pseudokinase mixed lineage kinase-domain-like (MLKL)—driving its oligomerization and membrane-disrupting necroptotic activity. Here, we show that TNF receptor-associated factor 2 (TRAF2)—previously implicated in apoptosis suppression—also inhibits necroptotic signaling by TNFα. TRAF2 disruption in mouse fibroblasts augmented TNFα–driven necrosome formation and RIPK3-MLKL association, promoting necroptosis. TRAF2 constitutively associated with MLKL, whereas TNFα reversed this via cylindromatosis-dependent TRAF2 deubiquitination. Ectopic interaction of TRAF2 and MLKL required the C-terminal portion but not the N-terminal, RING, or CIM region of TRAF2. Induced TRAF2 knockout (KO) in adult mice caused rapid lethality, in conjunction with increased hepatic necrosome assembly. By contrast, TRAF2 KO on a RIPK3 KO background caused delayed mortality, in concert with elevated intestinal caspase-8 protein and activity. Combined injection of TNFR1-Fc, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc decoys prevented death upon TRAF2 KO. However, Fas-Fc and DR5-Fc were ineffective, whereas TNFR1-Fc and interferon α receptor (IFNAR1)-Fc were partially protective against lethality upon combined TRAF2 and RIPK3 KO. These results identify TRAF2 as an important biological suppressor of necroptosis in vitro and in vivo.Apoptotic cell death is mediated by caspases and has distinct morphological features, including membrane blebbing, cell shrinkage and nuclear fragmentation.^{1, 2, 3, 4} In contrast, necroptotic cell death is caspase-independent and is characterized by loss of membrane integrity, cell swelling and implosion.^{1, 2, 5} Nevertheless, necroptosis is a highly regulated process, requiring activation of RIPK1 and RIPK3, which form the core necrosome complex.^{1, 2, 5} Necrosome assembly can be induced via specific death receptors or toll-like receptors, among other modules.^{6, 7, 8, 9} The activated necrosome engages MLKL by RIPK3-mediated phosphorylation.^{6, 10, 11} MLKL then oligomerizes and binds to membrane phospholipids, forming pores that cause necroptotic cell death.^{10, 12, 13, 14, 15} Unchecked necroptosis disrupts embryonic development in mice and contributes to several human diseases.^{7, 8, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22}The apoptotic mediators FADD, caspase-8 and cFLIP suppress necroptosis.^{19, 20, 21, 23, 24} Elimination of any of these genes in mice causes embryonic lethality, subverted by additional deletion of RIPK3 or MLKL.^{19, 20, 21, 25} Necroptosis is also regulated at the level of RIPK1. Whereas TNFα engagement of TNFR1 leads to K63-linked ubiquitination of RIPK1 by cellular inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (cIAPs) to promote nuclear factor (NF)-κB activation,²⁶ necroptosis requires suppression or reversal of this modification to allow RIPK1 autophosphorylation and consequent RIPK3 activation.^{2, 23, 27, 28} CYLD promotes necroptotic signaling by deubiquitinating RIPK1, augmenting its interaction with RIPK3.²⁹ Conversely, caspase-8-mediated CYLD cleavage inhibits necroptosis.²⁴TRAF2 recruits cIAPs to the TNFα-TNFR1 signaling complex, facilitating NF-κB activation.^{30, 31, 32, 33} TRAF2 also supports K48-linked ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of death-receptor-activated caspase-8, curbing apoptosis.³⁴ TRAF2 KO mice display embryonic lethality; some survive through birth but have severe developmental and immune deficiencies and die prematurely.^{35, 36} Conditional TRAF2 KO leads to rapid intestinal inflammation and mortality.³⁷ Furthermore, hepatic TRAF2 depletion augments apoptosis activation via Fas/CD95.³⁴ TRAF2 attenuates necroptosis induction in vitro by the death ligands Apo2L/TRAIL and Fas/CD95L.³⁸ However, it remains unclear whether TRAF2 regulates TNFα-induced necroptosis—and if so—how. Our present findings reveal that TRAF2 inhibits TNFα necroptotic signaling. Furthermore, our results establish TRAF2 as a biologically important necroptosis suppressor in vitro and in vivo and provide initial insight into the mechanisms underlying this function.     

Autophagy is a regulator of TGF-β1-induced fibrogenesis in primary human atrial myofibroblasts

Transforming growth factor-β₁ (TGF-β₁) is an important regulator of fibrogenesis in heart disease. In many other cellular systems, TGF-β₁ may also induce autophagy, but a link between its fibrogenic and autophagic effects is unknown. Thus we tested whether or not TGF-β₁-induced autophagy has a regulatory function on fibrosis in human atrial myofibroblasts (hATMyofbs). Primary hATMyofbs were treated with TGF-β₁ to assess for fibrogenic and autophagic responses. Using immunoblotting, immunofluorescence and transmission electron microscopic analyses, we found that TGF-β₁ promoted collagen type Iα2 and fibronectin synthesis in hATMyofbs and that this was paralleled by an increase in autophagic activation in these cells. Pharmacological inhibition of autophagy by bafilomycin-A1 and 3-methyladenine decreased the fibrotic response in hATMyofb cells. ATG7 knockdown in hATMyofbs and ATG5 knockout (mouse embryonic fibroblast) fibroblasts decreased the fibrotic effect of TGF-β₁ in experimental versus control cells. Furthermore, using a coronary artery ligation model of myocardial infarction in rats, we observed increases in the levels of protein markers of fibrosis, autophagy and Smad2 phosphorylation in whole scar tissue lysates. Immunohistochemistry for LC3β indicated the localization of punctate LC3β with vimentin (a mesenchymal-derived cell marker), ED-A fibronectin and phosphorylated Smad2. These results support the hypothesis that TGF-β₁-induced autophagy is required for the fibrogenic response in hATMyofbs.Interstitial fibrosis is common to many cardiovascular disease etiologies including myocardial infarction (MI),¹ diabetic cardiomyopathy² and hypertension.³ Fibrosis may arise due to maladaptive cardiac remodeling following injury and is a complex process resulting from activation of signaling pathways, such as TGF-β₁.⁴ TGF-β₁ signaling has broad-ranging effects that may affect cell growth, differentiation and the production of extracellular matrix (ECM) proteins.^{5, 6} Elevated TGF-β₁ is observed in post-MI rat heart⁷ and is associated with fibroblast-to-myofibroblast phenoconversion and concomitant activation of canonical Smad signaling.⁸ The result is a proliferation of myofibroblasts, which then leads to inappropriate deposition of fibrillar collagens, impaired cardiac function and, ultimately, heart failure.^{9, 10}Autophagy is necessary for cellular homeostasis and is involved in organelle and protein turnover.^{11, 12, 13, 14} Autophagy aids in cell survival by providing primary materials, for example, amino acids and fatty acids for anabolic pathways during starvation conditions.^{15, 16} Alternatively, autophagy may be associated with apoptosis through autodigestive cellular processes, cellular infection with pathogens or extracellular stimuli.^{17, 18, 19, 20} The overall control of cardiac fibrosis is likely due to the complex functioning of an array of regulatory factors, but to date, there is little evidence linking autophagy with fibrogenesis in cardiac tissue.^{11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 21, 22}Recent studies have demonstrated that TGF-β₁ may not only promote autophagy in mouse fibroblasts and human tubular epithelial kidney cells^{15, 23, 24} but can also inhibit this process in fibroblasts extracted from human patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis.²⁵ Moreover, it has recently been reported that autophagy can negatively¹⁵ and positively^{25, 26, 27} regulate the fibrotic process in different model cell systems. In this study, we have explored the putative link between autophagy and TGF-β₁-induced fibrogenesis in human atrial myofibroblasts (hATMyofbs) and in a model of MI rat heart.     

Cerium oxide nanoparticles protect against Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death

Evidence indicates that nitrosative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction participate in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer''s disease (AD). Amyloid beta (Aβ) and peroxynitrite induce mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death by abnormal activation of dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1), a large GTPase that regulates mitochondrial fission. The exact mechanisms of mitochondrial fragmentation and DRP1 overactivation in AD remain unknown; however, DRP1 serine 616 (S616) phosphorylation is likely involved. Although it is clear that nitrosative stress caused by peroxynitrite has a role in AD, effective antioxidant therapies are lacking. Cerium oxide nanoparticles, or nanoceria, switch between their Ce³⁺ and Ce⁴⁺ states and are able to scavenge superoxide anions, hydrogen peroxide and peroxynitrite. Therefore, nanoceria might protect against neurodegeneration. Here we report that nanoceria are internalized by neurons and accumulate at the mitochondrial outer membrane and plasma membrane. Furthermore, nanoceria reduce levels of reactive nitrogen species and protein tyrosine nitration in neurons exposed to peroxynitrite. Importantly, nanoceria reduce endogenous peroxynitrite and Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation, DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation and neuronal cell death.Nitric oxide (NO) is a neurotransmitter and neuromodulator required for learning and memory.¹ NO is generated by NO synthases, a group of enzymes that produce NO from L-arginine. In addition to its normal role in physiology, NO is implicated in pathophysiology. When overproduced, NO combines with superoxide anions (O₂·⁻), byproducts of aerobic metabolism and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, to form peroxynitrite anions (ONOO⁻) that are highly reactive and neurotoxic. Accumulation of these reactive oxygen species (ROS) and reactive nitrogen species (RNS), known as oxidative and nitrosative stress, respectively, is a common feature of aging, neurodegeneration and Alzheimer''s disease (AD).¹Nitrosative stress caused by peroxynitrite has a critical role in the etiology and pathogenesis of AD.^{2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7} Peroxynitrite is implicated in the formation of the two hallmarks of AD, Aβ aggregates and neurofibrillary tangles containing hyperphosphorylated Tau protein.^{1, 4, 7} In addition, peroxynitrite promotes the nitrotyrosination of presenilin 1, the catalytic subunit of the γ-secretase complex, which shifts production of Aβ to amyloid beta (Aβ)42 and increases the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, ultimately resulting in an increased propensity for aggregation and neurotoxicity.⁵ Furthermore, nitration of Aβ tyrosine 10 enhances its aggregation.⁶ Peroxynitrite can also modify enzymes, such as triosephosphate isomerase,⁴ and activate kinases, including Jun amino-terminal kinase and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase, which enhance neuronal cell death.^{8, 9} Moreover, peroxynitrite can trigger the release of free metals such as Zn²⁺ from intracellular stores with consequent inhibition of mitochondrial function and enhancement of neuronal cell death.^{10, 11, 12} Finally, peroxynitrite can irreversibly inhibit complexes I and IV of the mitochondrial respiratory chain.^{11, 13}Because mitochondria have a critical role in neurons as energy producers to fuel vital processes such as synaptic transmission and axonal transport,¹⁴ and mitochondrial dysfunction is a well-documented and early event in AD,¹⁵ it is important to consider how peroxynitrite and nitrosative stress affect mitochondria. Although the ultimate cause of mitochondrial dysfunction in AD remains unclear, an imbalance in mitochondrial fission and fusion is one possibility.^{1, 14, 16, 17, 18} Notably, peroxynitrite, N-methyl D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor activation and Aβ can induce mitochondrial fragmentation by activating mitochondrial fission and/or inhibiting fusion.¹⁶ Mitochondrial fission and fusion is regulated by large GTPases of the dynamin family, including dynamin-related protein 1 (DRP1) that is required for mitochondrial division,¹⁹ and inhibition of mitochondrial division by overexpression of the GTPase-defective DRP1^K38A mutant provides protection against peroxynitrite-, NMDA- and Aβ-induced mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death.¹⁶The exact mechanism of peroxynitrite-induced mitochondrial fragmentation remains unclear. A recent report suggested that S-nitrosylation of DRP1 at cysteine 644 increases DRP1 activity and is the cause of peroxynitrite-induced mitochondrial fragmentation in AD;²⁰ however, the work remains controversial, suggesting that alternative pathways might be involved.²¹ For example, peroxynitrite also causes rapid DRP1 S616 phosphorylation that promotes its translocation to mitochondria and organelle division.^{21, 22} In mitotic cells, DRP1 S616 phosphorylation is mediated by Cdk1/cyclinB1 and synchronizes mitochondrial division with cell division.²³ Interestingly, DRP1 is S616 hyperphosphorylated in AD brains, suggesting that this event might contribute to mitochondrial fragmentation in the disease.^{21, 22} A recent report indicates that Cdk5/p35 is responsible for DRP1 S616 phosphorylation,²⁴ and notably aberrant Cdk5/p35/p25 signaling is associated with AD pathogenesis.²⁵ Thus, we explored here the possible role of DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation in Aβ- and peroxynitrite-mediated mitochondrial fragmentation.Under normal conditions, accumulated mitochondrial superoxide anions and hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) can be neutralized by superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase. Nitrosative stress in aging and AD might be explained by a loss of antioxidant enzymes. Previous studies suggest that expression of SOD subtypes is decreased in the human AD brain.^{26, 27} Furthermore, SOD1 deletion in a mouse model of AD increased the burden of amyloid plaques.²⁶ By contrast, overexpression of SOD2 in a mouse model of AD decreased the Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio and alleviated memory deficits.^{28, 29} There is currently a lack of antioxidants that can effectively quench superoxide anions, H₂O₂ or peroxynitrite and provide lasting effects. Cerium is a rare earth element and cerium oxide (CeO₂) nanoparticles, or nanoceria, shuttle between their 3+ or 4+ states. Oxidation of Ce⁴⁺ to Ce³⁺ causes oxygen vacancies and defects on the surface of the crystalline lattice structure of the nanoparticles, generating a cage for redox reactions to occur.³⁰ Accordingly, nanoceria mimic the catalytic activities of antioxidant enzymes, such as SOD^{31, 32} and catalase,³³ and are able to neutralize peroxynitrite.³⁴ Because of these antioxidant properties, we hypothesized that nanoceria could detoxify peroxynitrite and protect against Aβ-induced DRP1 S616 hyperphosphorylation, mitochondrial fragmentation and neuronal cell death.     

RanBP9 at the intersection between cofilin and Aβ pathologies: rescue of neurodegenerative changes by RanBP9 reduction

Molecular pathways underlying the neurotoxicity and production of amyloid β protein (Aβ) represent potentially promising therapeutic targets for Alzheimer''s disease (AD). We recently found that overexpression of the scaffolding protein RanBP9 increases Aβ production in cell lines and in transgenic mice while promoting cofilin activation and mitochondrial dysfunction. Translocation of cofilin to mitochondria and induction of cofilin–actin pathology require the activation/dephosphorylation of cofilin by Slingshot homolog 1 (SSH1) and cysteine oxidation of cofilin. In this study, we found that endogenous RanBP9 positively regulates SSH1 levels and mediates Aβ-induced translocation of cofilin to mitochondria and induction of cofilin–actin pathology in cultured cells, primary neurons, and in vivo. Endogenous level of RanBP9 was also required for Aβ-induced collapse of growth cones in immature neurons (days in vitro 9 (DIV9)) and depletion of synaptic proteins in mature neurons (DIV21). In vivo, amyloid precursor protein (APP)/presenilin-1 (PS1) mice exhibited 3.5-fold increased RanBP9 levels, and RanBP9 reduction protected against cofilin–actin pathology, synaptic damage, gliosis, and Aβ accumulation associated with APP/PS1 mice. Brains slices derived from APP/PS1 mice showed significantly impaired long-term potentiation (LTP), and RanBP9 reduction significantly enhanced paired pulse facilitation and LTP, as well as partially rescued contextual memory deficits associated with APP/PS1 mice. Therefore, these results underscore the critical importance of endogenous RanBP9 not only in Aβ accumulation but also in mediating the neurotoxic actions of Aβ at the level of synaptic plasticity, mitochondria, and cofilin–actin pathology via control of the SSH1-cofilin pathway in vivo.The defining pathological hallmark of Alzheimer''s disease (AD) is the accumulation of amyloid β protein (Aβ) in brain associated with tau pathology, synapse loss, cytoskeletal aberrations, mitochondrial dysfunction, and cognitive decline. The generation of Aβ occurs via sequential β- and γ-secretase processing of the amyloid precursor protein (APP) by beta site APP cleaving enzyme 1 (BACE1) and the presenilin (PS) complex, respectively.¹ Soluble oligomeric forms of Aβ are thought to be the most toxic species, resulting in synaptic loss and downstream neurotoxicity.² Despite the requirement for Tau in multiple aspects of Aβ-induced neurotoxicity,³ a large knowledge gap exists as to how the Aβ oligomer-induced neurotoxic signals are transduced intracellularly to impair synaptic plasticity, eventually leading to neurodegeneration. Both Aβ and Tau promote cofilin–actin pathology,^{4, 5} cofilin–actin pathology is widespread in AD brains,⁶ and cofilin activity is also increased in AD brains.⁷ Cofilin normally functions as a key regulator of actin dynamics that destabilizes filamentous actin (F-actin). Cofilin is inactivated by phosphorylation on Ser3 by LIM kinase 1 (LIMK1), whereas its dephosphorylation by Slingshot homolog 1 (SSH1) activates cofilin.⁴ Upon oxidative stress and/or Ca²⁺ elevation,^{4, 8, 9} SSH1 is activated and active cofilin becomes oxidized on cysteine residues, resulting in rapid mitochondrial translocation to promote apoptosis and induction of cofilin–actin pathology.^{10, 11} An early and consistent impairment secondary to Aβ oligomer treatment in primary neurons is the shrinkage of dendritic spines¹² involving the rearrangement of F-actin cytoskeleton in spines and loss of spine-associated proteins such as postsynaptic density-95 (PSD95) and Drebrin,^{13, 14} as well as impaired mitochondrial function.^{15, 16}We recently found that overexpression of the scaffolding protein RanBP9 increases Aβ production in cell lines and in transgenic mice.^{17, 18} Moreover, RanBP9 is significantly increased in brains of AD patients and the J20 APP transgenic model.^{18, 19} In studying the trafficking of APP, we also found that RanBP9 overexpression not only promotes the endocytosis of APP but also those of LRP and β1-integrin, the latter resulting in disassembly of integrin-associated focal complexes (talin and vinculin).²⁰ In addition, RanBP9 overexpression promotes cofilin activation and the translocation of cofilin to mitochondria, resulting in overall mitochondrial dysfunction.^{9, 19} However, how RanBP9 activates cofilin is unknown, and it is not clear whether reduction in endogenous RanBP9 protects against Aβ oligomer-induced deficits in synaptic plasticity, cofilin-dependent pathology, Aβ accumulation, and memory impairment. Here we report that short interfering ribonucleic acid (siRNA) or genetic reduction in RanBP9 significantly reduces SSH1 levels and mitigates Aβ-induced translocation of cofilin to mitochondria, cofilin–actin rod/aggregate formation, depletion of synaptic proteins, deficits in synaptic plasticity, Aβ accumulation, and contextual memory deficits in vivo.     

Protein kinase D1/2 is involved in the maturation of multivesicular bodies and secretion of exosomes in T and B lymphocytes

Multivesicular bodies (MVBs) are endocytic compartments that enclose intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) formed by inward budding from the limiting membrane of endosomes. In T lymphocytes, these ILV contain Fas ligand (FasL) and are secreted as ''lethal exosomes'' following activation-induced fusion of the MVB with the plasma membrane. Diacylglycerol (DAG) and diacylglycerol kinase α (DGKα) regulate MVB maturation and polarized traffic, as well as subsequent secretion of pro-apoptotic exosomes, but the molecular basis underlying these phenomena remains unclear. Here we identify protein kinase D (PKD) family members as DAG effectors involved in MVB genesis and secretion. We show that the inducible secretion of exosomes is enhanced when a constitutively active PKD1 mutant is expressed in T lymphocytes, whereas exosome secretion is impaired in PKD2-deficient mouse T lymphoblasts and in PKD1/3-null B cells. Analysis of PKD2-deficient T lymphoblasts showed the presence of large, immature MVB-like vesicles and demonstrated defects in cytotoxic activity and in activation-induced cell death. Using pharmacological and genetic tools, we show that DGKα regulates PKD1/2 subcellular localization and activation. Our studies demonstrate that PKD1/2 is a key regulator of MVB maturation and exosome secretion, and constitutes a mediator of the DGKα effect on MVB secretory traffic.Exosomes are nanovesicles that form as intraluminal vesicles (ILVs) inside multivesicular bodies (MVBs) and are then secreted by numerous cell types.¹ ILVs are generated by inward budding of late endosome limiting membrane in a precisely regulated maturation process.^{2, 3} Two main pathways are involved in MVB maturation.^{4, 5} In addition to the ESCRT (endosomal complex required for traffic) proteins,⁶ there is increasing evidence that lipids such as lyso-bisphosphatidic acid (LBPA),⁷ ceramides⁸ and diacylglycerol (DAG)⁹ contribute to this membrane invagination process.Exosomes participate in many biological processes related to T-cell receptor (TCR)-triggered immune responses, including T lymphocyte-mediated cytotoxicity and activation-induced cell death (AICD), antigen presentation and intercellular miRNA exchange.^{10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15} The discovery of exosome involvement in these responses increased interest in the regulation of exosome biogenesis and secretory traffic, with special attention to the contribution of lipids such as ceramide and DAG, as well as DAG-binding proteins.^{14, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21} These studies suggest that positive and negative DAG regulators may control secretory traffic. By transforming DAG into phosphatidic acid (PA), diacylglycerol kinase α (DGKα) is essential for the negative control of DAG function in T lymphocytes.²² DGKα translocates transiently to the T-cell membrane after human muscarinic type 1 receptor (HM1R) triggering or to the immune synapse (IS) after TCR stimulation; at these subcellular locations, DGKα acts as a negative modulator of phospholipase C (PLC)-generated DAG.^{23, 24}The secretory vesicle pathway involves several DAG-controlled checkpoints at which DGKα may act; these include vesicle formation and fission at the trans-Golgi network (TGN), MVB maturation, as well as their transport, docking and fusion to the plasma membrane.^{9, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20} The molecular components that regulate some of these trafficking processes include protein kinase D (PKD) family members.²¹ PKD1 activity, for instance, regulates fission of transport vesicles from TGN via direct interaction with the pre-existing DAG pool at this site.¹⁹ The cytosolic serine/threonine kinases PKD1, PKD2 and PKD3^{(ref. 21)} are expressed in a wide range of cells, with PKD2 the most abundant isotype in T lymphocytes.^{25, 26} PKD have two DAG-binding domains (C1a and C1b) at the N terminus,²¹ which mediate PKD recruitment to cell membranes. Protein kinase C (PKC) phosphorylation at the PKD activation loop further promotes PKD autophosphorylation and activation.²⁷Based on our previous studies showing DGKα regulation of DAG in MVB formation and exosome secretion,^{9, 14, 28} and the identification of PKD1/2 association to MVB,¹⁴ we hypothesized that DGKα control of DAG mediates these events, at least in part, through PKD. Here we explored whether, in addition to its role in vesicle fission from TGN,¹⁹ PKD regulates other steps in the DAG-controlled secretory traffic pathway. Using PKD-deficient cell models, we analyzed the role of PKD1/2 in MVB formation and function, and demonstrate their implication in exosome secretory traffic.     

Neural stem cell transplantation at critical period improves learning and memory through restoring synaptic impairment in Alzheimer's disease mouse model

Alzheimer''s disease (AD) is characterized by neuronal loss in several regions of the brain. Recent studies have suggested that stem cell transplantation could serve as a potential therapeutic strategy to halt or ameliorate the inexorable disease progression. However, the optimal stage of the disease for stem cell transplantation to have a therapeutic effect has yet to be determined. Here, we demonstrated that transplantation of neural stem cells into 12-month-old Tg2576 brains markedly improved both cognitive impairments and neuropathological features by reducing β-amyloid processing and upregulating clearance of β-amyloid, secretion of anti-inflammatory cytokines, endogenous neurogenesis, as well as synapse formation. In contrast, the stem cell transplantation did not recover cognitive dysfunction and β-amyloid neuropathology in Tg2576 mice aged 15 months when the memory loss is manifest. Overall, this study underscores that stem cell therapy at optimal time frame is crucial to obtain maximal therapeutic effects that can restore functional deficits or stop the progression of AD.Alzheimer''s disease (AD) is the most common neurodegenerative disorder, and is characterized by progressive cognitive dysfunction and memory loss that are caused by the death of nerve cells in several brain regions, including the cortex and hippocampus. Pathologically, senile plaques, including amyloid beta (Aβ) and carboxy-terminal fragments (CTFs) are derived via amyloid precursor protein (APP) proteolysis, and neurofibrillary tangles, including hyperphosphorylated tau, are two representative hallmarks of AD.^{1, 2, 3} Together with the accumulation of Aβ, local inflammation, altered hippocampal neurogenesis and synaptic loss have been correlated with cognitive deficits in AD patients.^{4, 5} However, no treatment has yet been developed that can cure or prevent the progression of dementia.Accumulating evidence indicates that the transplantation of neural stem cells (NSCs) or bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs) into the hippocampus improves cognitive functions in AD animal models.^{6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12} The stem cell-induced functional recovery seems to be mediated by either neurotrophic factors and/or neuroprotective cytokines. For instance, genetically engineered stem cells that secrete nerve growth factor (NGF),^{11, 12} the co-administration of stem cells with brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) or grafting encapsulated vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) secreting cells substantially improved behavioral outcomes of AD animal models.^{9, 13} Thus, the functional effects of stem cell grafts involve the increase of several neurotrophic factors, such as BDNF, FGF2, insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF1), NGF and VEGF.^{10, 14, 15} In contrast, BMSCs or adipose-derived stem cells (ASCs) transplantation induces microglial activation^{16, 17, 18} and the secretion of neuroprotective cytokines, leading to a decline of Aβ deposits and the restoration of memory deficits in AD mice.^{18, 19} However, the optimal stage of the disease for stem cell transplantation in AD models has yet to be determined.In this study, we have investigated whether the transplantation of NSCs at two distinguished stages in the disease development could have different beneficial effects in AD model mice, Tg2576 mice.²⁰ In this model, the over-production of Aβ begins at 6–7 months of age, and neuritic plaques with amyloid cores are formed from 9 to 12 months after birth followed by the onset of memory deficits at 12 months of age.^{21, 22, 23} NSCs were bilaterally transplanted into the dentate gyrus (DG) of the hippocampus and the third ventricle of 12-month-old (early stage) or 15-month-old (advanced stage) Tg2576 and age-matched wild-type (WT) mice. We determined whether the engrafted NSCs at two stages of the disease rescued cognitive deficits and the neuropathology of the mice.     

Ret is essential to mediate GDNF's neuroprotective and neuroregenerative effect in a Parkinson disease mouse model

Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is a potent survival and regeneration-promoting factor for dopaminergic neurons in cell and animal models of Parkinson disease (PD). GDNF is currently tested in clinical trials on PD patients with so far inconclusive results. The receptor tyrosine kinase Ret is the canonical GDNF receptor, but several alternative GDNF receptors have been proposed, raising the question of which signaling receptor mediates here the beneficial GDNF effects. To address this question we overexpressed GDNF in the striatum of mice deficient for Ret in dopaminergic neurons and subsequently challenged these mice with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP). Strikingly, in this established PD mouse model, the absence of Ret completely abolished GDNF''s neuroprotective and regenerative effect on the midbrain dopaminergic system. This establishes Ret signaling as absolutely required for GDNF''s effects to prevent and compensate dopaminergic system degeneration and suggests Ret activation as the primary target of GDNF therapy in PD.Glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF) is the founding member of the four ligands in the GDNF family, which belong to the transforming growth factor-β superfamily.¹ GDNF was characterized as a potent survival factor for many neurons in culture such as dopaminergic, motor, sympathetic, parasympathetic, sensory and enteric neurons.^{1, 2} In addition, in dopaminergic neuron cultures GDNF stimulates neuronal differentiation, neurite outgrowth, synapse formation and dopamine release.^{1, 2}As degeneration of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta (SNpc) represents a major hallmark of Parkinson disease (PD), the most common neurodegenerative movement disorder, GDNF has raised considerable interest as a therapeutic molecule for the treatment of PD.^{3, 4, 5} PD affects >2% of individuals over the age of 60 years, but no curative treatment is available to date, mainly due to a lack of understanding disease etiology.^{6, 7, 8} Preclinical studies in the established 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) and 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rodent and primate models of PD demonstrated a substantial neuroprotection and regeneration effect by striatal provided GDNF or its close relative neurturin.^{3, 4, 9} However, clinical phase II trials on PD patients using GDNF or neurturin did so far not convincingly recapitulate their beneficial effects on the dopaminergic system in humans most likely due to technical problems and the selection of advanced PD patients.^{10, 11, 12, 13}GDNF signaling is highly complex as this neurotrophic factor can bind to a variety of receptors, thus being able to induce pleiotropic effects. GDNF efficiently binds to the GPI-linked GDNF family receptor α1 (GFRα1).^{1, 2} It has been shown that the GDNF/GFRα1 complex can activate not only the canonical GDNF receptor Ret, a receptor tyrosine kinase which signals through the sarcoma protein (Src)/rat sarcoma (Ras)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt, NF-κB (nuclear factor ''kappa-light-chain-enhancer'' of activated B cells), JNK (c-Jun N-terminal kinases) and PLCγ (phospholipase γ) pathway, but also with other signaling inducing receptors.^{1, 2, 4, 5, 13} So far, at least four alternative GDNF receptors have been described which are all expressed in midbrain dopaminergic neurons, NCAM,^{14, 15} the integrins αV and βI,^{14, 16} syndecan 3¹⁷ and N-cadherin.¹⁸ Interestingly, Ret is not essential during pre- and postnatal development of the mouse dopaminergic system,^{19, 20, 21, 22, 23} but specifically required for the maintenance of SNpc dopaminergic neurons and their striatal innervation in aged mice.^{23, 24, 25} In contrast, GDNF seems most likely under physiological conditions to be dispensable during development and maintenance of midbrain dopaminergic neurons in mice, although conflicting results exist.^{26, 27, 28} Thus, Ret might be activated by a GDNF-independent mechanism to stimulate SNpc dopaminergic neuron survival. In addition, the in vivo function of the alternative GDNF receptors in the dopaminergic system under physiological and pathophysiological conditions, like PD, and their dependence on GDNF has not yet been addressed in detail. This raised the important question which GDNF receptor might be required to mediate GDNF''s reported neuroprotective and regenerative effect in the dopaminergic system in PD animal models and potentially in PD patients.^{5, 29}Previously, we showed in dopaminergic neuron-specific Ret knockout mice that Ret receptor loss does not result in a higher vulnerability of midbrain dopaminergic neurons against MPTP but to less resprouting of left over dopaminergic neuron axons in the striatum after MPTP intoxication.³⁰ In adult mice endogenous GDNF levels are rather low.^{26, 31} Therefore, we could not rule out in that study the possibility, that higher levels of GDNF—as also used in the clinical GDNF trials in PD patients—might have neuroprotective and regenerating effects even in the absence of the Ret receptor. Here we addressed now this question by viral overexpression of GDNF in MPTP-treated mice lacking expression of Ret again specifically in dopaminergic neurons.^{23, 30} We found that in the absence of Ret in dopaminergic neurons even a substantial overexpression of GDNF in the striatum does not have a neuroprotective and regenerative effect. Thus, despite the expression of alternative GDNF receptors on midbrain dopaminergic neurons, the presence of the canonical GDNF receptor Ret seems to be mandatory for mediating GDNF''s beneficial survival and axonal resprouting effect in these neurons.     

p73 is required for endothelial cell differentiation,migration and the formation of vascular networks regulating VEGF and TGFβ signaling

Vasculogenesis, the establishment of the vascular plexus and angiogenesis, branching of new vessels from the preexisting vasculature, involves coordinated endothelial differentiation, proliferation and migration. Disturbances in these coordinated processes may accompany diseases such as cancer. We hypothesized that the p53 family member p73, which regulates cell differentiation in several contexts, may be important in vascular development. We demonstrate that p73 deficiency perturbed vascular development in the mouse retina, decreasing vascular branching, density and stability. Furthermore, p73 deficiency could affect non endothelial cells (ECs) resulting in reduced in vivo proangiogenic milieu. Moreover, p73 functional inhibition, as well as p73 deficiency, hindered vessel sprouting, tubulogenesis and the assembly of vascular structures in mouse embryonic stem cell and induced pluripotent stem cell cultures. Therefore, p73 is necessary for EC biology and vasculogenesis and, in particular, that DNp73 regulates EC migration and tube formation capacity by regulation of expression of pro-angiogenic factors such as transforming growth factor-β and vascular endothelial growth factors. DNp73 expression is upregulated in the tumor environment, resulting in enhanced angiogenic potential of B16-F10 melanoma cells. Our results demonstrate, by the first time, that differential p73-isoform regulation is necessary for physiological vasculogenesis and angiogenesis and DNp73 overexpression becomes a positive advantage for tumor progression due to its pro-angiogenic capacity.Vascular system formation is one of the earliest events during organogenesis.¹ The original vascular plexus is established by vasculogenesis, through differentiation and assembly of mesodermal precursors.² The angiogenesis process allows the formation of new blood vessels from the existing vasculature and is perturbed in many diseases, including cancer.³ Although efforts have been made to identify factors that control vascular development, the understanding of the molecular networks remains incomplete.The formation of new capillaries and the remodeling of preexisting blood vessels is linked by signal transduction pathways.⁴ The members of the p53 family (p53, p73 and p63) coordinate cell proliferation, migration and differentiation, and could act as regulators of vascular development. TP73 function in angiogenesis is quite controversial,^{5, 6, 7} and it has never been addressed using developmental models.TP73 has a dual nature that resides in the existence of TA and DNp73 variants. TAp73 is capable of transactivating p53 targets^{8, 9, 10} whereas DNp73 can act as p53 and TAp73 repressor.^{11, 12, 13} TP73 final outcome will depend upon the differential expression of the TA/DNp73 isoforms in each cellular context, as they can execute synergic, as well as antagonist, functions.TP73 role during development is emphasized by the p73-knockout mice (Trp73−/−, p73KO from now on) multiple growth defects.¹⁴ These mice, which lack all p73 isoforms, exhibit gastrointestinal and cranial hemorrhages,¹⁴ suggestive of vascular fragility. Furthermore, TAp73 directly regulates GATA-1,⁸ which is essential for endothelial and hematopoietic differentiation.^{15, 16} This compounded information led us to hypothesize that p73 could be implicated in the regulation of vasculogenesis/angiogenesis.Regulation of these processes involves a broad range of signaling molecules essential for vascular growth and stability,¹⁷ such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)¹⁸ and transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β).¹⁹ TGF-β operates as a rheostat that controls endothelial cell (EC) differentiation, having an inhibitory effect on EC migration and proliferation by the TGF-β/TGFRI (ALK5)/Smad2/3 pathway, while the TβRII–ALK5/ALK1 complex activates Smad1/5/8, ID1 expression and a pro-angiogenic state.^{20, 21, 22}Regulation of the TGF-β and VEGF pathways by p53 family members has been documented.^{23, 24} However, p73''s function in these pathways during development remains largely unexplored. In this work, we have used mouse embryonic stem cells (mESC) and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) as models that recapitulate early vascular morphogenesis.^{25, 26, 27} ESC and iPSC form multi-cellular aggregates (embryoid bodies, EBs) that, under appropriate conditions, generate functional EC.²⁸ mESC and iPSC differentiation capacity into ECs has been fully addressed.^{29, 30} We have also performed retinal vascularization analysis to assess vascular processes in vivo.^{31, 32}We demonstrate that p73 deficiency perturbs density and stability of mouse retinal development by affecting VEGF and TGF-β signaling. Furthermore, p73 is necessary for the assembly of vascular structures under physiological conditions in mESC and iPSC. Moreover, DNp73 positively affects angiogenesis through regulation of the TGF-β pathway in human umbilical vein cells (HUVEC) and DNp73-overexpression results in enhanced angiogenic potential of B16-F10 melanoma cells.     

Bak apoptotic pores involve a flexible C-terminal region and juxtaposition of the C-terminal transmembrane domains

Bak and Bax mediate apoptotic cell death by oligomerizing and forming a pore in the mitochondrial outer membrane. Both proteins anchor to the outer membrane via a C-terminal transmembrane domain, although its topology within the apoptotic pore is not known. Cysteine-scanning mutagenesis and hydrophilic labeling confirmed that in healthy mitochondria the Bak α9 segment traverses the outer membrane, with 11 central residues shielded from labeling. After pore formation those residues remained shielded, indicating that α9 does not line a pore. Bak (and Bax) activation allowed linkage of α9 to neighboring α9 segments, identifying an α9:α9 interface in Bak (and Bax) oligomers. Although the linkage pattern along α9 indicated a preferred packing surface, there was no evidence of a dimerization motif. Rather, the interface was invoked in part by Bak conformation change and in part by BH3:groove dimerization. The α9:α9 interaction may constitute a secondary interface in Bak oligomers, as it could link BH3:groove dimers to high-order oligomers. Moreover, as high-order oligomers were generated when α9:α9 linkage in the membrane was combined with α6:α6 linkage on the membrane surface, the α6-α9 region in oligomerized Bak is flexible. These findings provide the first view of Bak carboxy terminus (C terminus) membrane topology within the apoptotic pore.Mitochondrial permeabilization during apoptosis is regulated by the Bcl-2 family of proteins.^{1, 2, 3} Although the Bcl-2 homology 3 (BH3)-only members such as Bid and Bim trigger apoptosis by binding to other family members, the prosurvival members block apoptosis by sequestering their pro-apoptotic relatives. Two remaining members, Bak and Bax, form the apoptotic pore within the mitochondrial outer membrane (MOM).Bak and Bax are globular proteins comprising nine α-helices.^{4, 5} They are activated by BH3-only proteins binding to the α2–α5 surface groove,^{6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12} or for Bax, to the α1/α6 ‘rear pocket''.¹³ Binding triggers dissociation of the latch domain (α6–α8) from the core domain (α2–α5), together with exposure of N-terminal epitopes and the BH3 domain.^{6, 7, 14, 15, 16} The exposed BH3 domain then binds to the hydrophobic groove in another Bak or Bax molecule to generate symmetric homodimers.^{6, 7, 14, 17, 18} In addition to dimerizing, parts of activated Bak and Bax associate with the lipid bilayer.¹⁹ In Bax, the α5 and α6 helices may insert into the MOM,²⁰ although recent studies indicate that they lie in-plane on the membrane surface, with the hydrophobic α5 sandwiched between the membrane and a BH3:groove dimer interface.^{7, 21, 22, 23} The dimers can be linked via cysteine residues placed in α6,^{18, 24, 25} and more recently via cysteine residues in either α3 or α5,^{6, 21} allowing detection of the higher-order oligomers associated with pore formation.^{26, 27} However, whether these interactions are required for high-order oligomers and pore formation remains unclear.Like most Bcl-2 members, Bak and Bax are targeted to the MOM via a hydrophobic C-terminal region. The C terminus targets Bak to the MOM in healthy cells,²⁸ whereas the Bax C terminus is either exposed²⁹ or sequestered within the hydrophobic groove until apoptotic signals trigger Bax translocation.^{5, 30, 31} The hydrophobic stretch is important, as substituting polar or charged residues decreased targeting of Bak and Bax.^{10, 32} Mitochondrial targeting is also controlled by basic residues at the far C termini,^{32, 33, 34} and by interaction with VDAC2^{35, 36} via the Bak and Bax C termini.^{37, 38} Retrotranslocation of Bak and Bax was also altered by swapping the C termini.³⁹The membrane topology of the Bak and Bax C termini before and after apoptosis has not been examined directly, due in part to difficulty in reconstituting oligomers of full-length Bak in artificial membranes. Nor is it known whether the C termini contribute to pore formation by promoting oligomerization or disturbing the membrane. To address these questions synthetic peptides based on the Bak and Bax C termini have been studied in model membranes. The peptides adopt a predominantly α-helical secondary structure,^{40, 41, 42, 43} with orientation affected by lipid composition.^{42, 44, 45} The peptides could also permeabilize lipid vesicles,^{41, 43, 46, 47} suggesting that the C termini in full-length Bak and Bax may contribute to pore formation.Here we examined the membrane topology of the C termini within full-length Bak and Bax in the MOM, both before and after apoptotic pore formation. After pore formation the α9 helices of Bak (and of Bax) became juxtaposed but did not line the surface of a pore. The α9:α9 interaction occurred after Bak activation and conformation change, but was promoted by formation of BH3:groove dimers. Combining linkage at more than one interface indicated that the Bak α9:α9 interface can link BH3:groove dimers to high-order oligomers, and moreover, that the α6–α9 region is flexible in oligomerized Bak.     

Mer receptor tyrosine kinase mediates both tethering and phagocytosis of apoptotic cells

Billions of inflammatory leukocytes die and are phagocytically cleared each day. This regular renewal facilitates the normal termination of inflammatory responses, suppressing pro-inflammatory mediators and inducing their anti-inflammatory counterparts. Here we investigate the role of the receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) Mer and its ligands Protein S and Gas6 in the initial recognition and capture of apoptotic cells (ACs) by macrophages. We demonstrate extremely rapid binding kinetics of both ligands to phosphatidylserine (PtdSer)-displaying ACs, and show that ACs can be co-opsonized with multiple PtdSer opsonins. We further show that macrophage phagocytosis of ACs opsonized with Mer ligands can occur independently of a requirement for αV integrins. Finally, we demonstrate a novel role for Mer in the tethering of ACs to the macrophage surface, and show that Mer-mediated tethering and subsequent AC engulfment can be distinguished by their requirement for Mer kinase activity. Our results identify Mer as a receptor uniquely capable of both tethering ACs to the macrophage surface and driving their subsequent internalization.Many diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, pulmonary fibrosis, adult respiratory distress syndrome, and inflammatory bowel disease,^{1, 2, 3, 4} are commonly marked by impaired resolution of inflammation that is linked to defects in the phagocytic clearance of apoptotic cells.^{5, 6, 7} Apoptotic cell (AC) clearance normally eliminates a plethora of pro-inflammatory stimuli,^{8, 9} and the recognition of ACs by phagocytes¹⁰ limits progression to necrosis,¹¹ suppresses pro-inflammatory mediator production, and induces IL-10 and TGF-β release.^{12, 13} As defective clearance of ACs is associated with the development of inflammatory disease and autoimmunity,^{14, 15} new therapeutic approaches designed to increase the capacity of phagocytes to remove ACs could effectively promote the resolution of inflammation.Phagocytosis of ACs can be regulated by soluble mediators, including cytokines,^{16, 17} prostaglandins and lipoxins,^{17, 18, 19} serum proteins,²⁰ agonists of Liver X receptors (LXRs),^{17, 21} and glucocorticoids (GC).^{17, 22} In particular, LXR agonists and GCs promote phagocytosis of ACs predominantly via a Tyro3/Axl/Mer (TAM) receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-dependent pathway.^{17, 21, 23} There are two established ligands for the TAM RTKs, Protein S (gene name Pros1), which activates Tyro3 and Mer, and Gas6, which activates all three TAMs,^{24, 25} although other ligands have been suggested.^{26, 27} The amino terminal Gla domains of Protein S and Gas6 bind to phosphatidylserine (PtdSer) on the plasma membrane of ACs,²⁸ a potent ‘eat-me'' signal by which ACs are recognized by phagocytes.²⁹ TAM receptors bind to the carboxy terminal domains of Protein S and Gas6, which effectively act as molecular ‘bridges'' between PtdSer on the AC and TAM receptors on the phagocyte.^{17, 30, 31} TAM receptor- and ligand-deficient mice exhibit defective phagocytic pruning of photoreceptor outer segments by retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells of the eye,^{32, 33, 34} defective clearance of apoptotic germ cells by Sertoli cells of the testis,³⁵ and defective clearance of ACs by macrophages/dendritic cells in lymphoid organs.³⁶ These phenotypes are also detectable in Mer (gene name Mertk) single knockouts.³⁷ In addition to phagocytic clearance, TAM signaling also has a pivotal role in controlling the innate immune response to pathogenic stimuli.^{13, 17, 38}Although the importance of Mer in the internalization of ACs by macrophages is now well-established, this receptor has been thought not to have a significant role in the initial ‘tethering'' of ACs to the macrophage surface.^{36, 39} In their studies, Scott et al.³⁶ used peritoneal macrophages for which tethering of ACs has now been shown to be mediated by T-cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain-containing molecule 4 (TIM4).³⁹ Subsequent internalization of tethered ACs is then mediated by either integrin αvβ3- or Mer-mediated signaling.^{39, 40} Similarly, for RPE cells, the initial capture of photoreceptor outer segments by RPE cells required the integrin αvβ5,⁴¹ with Mer-dependent signaling necessary for subsequent internalization. To further probe the mechanistic role of Mer in AC recognition and engulfment, we have now examined macrophages that predominantly use a Mer-dependent AC phagocytosis mechanism.^{17, 23} We show that in these cells, which do not express TIM4, Mer has the capacity to serve a unique dual role in mediating both tethering of ACs to the macrophage surface as well as subsequent AC engulfment.