Distinct Ubiquitination Cascades Act on the Peroxisomal Targeting Signal Type 2 Co‐receptor Pex18p

Peroxisomal matrix protein import is facilitated by cycling receptors that recognize their cargo proteins in the cytosol by a peroxisomal targeting sequence (PTS) and ferry them to the peroxisomal membrane. Subsequently, the cargo is translocated into the peroxisomal lumen, whereas the receptor is released to the cytosol for further rounds of protein import. This cycle is controlled by the ubiquitination status of the receptor, which is best understood for the PTS1‐receptor. While polyubiquitination of PTS‐receptors results in their proteasomal degradation, the monoubiquitinated PTS‐receptors are exported to the cytosol and recycled for further rounds of protein import. Here, we describe the identification of two ubiquitination cascades acting on the PTS2 co‐receptor Pex18p. Using in vivo and in vitro approaches, we demonstrate that the polyubiquitination of Pex18p requires the ubiquitin‐conjugating enzyme (E2) Ubc4p, which cooperates with the RING (really interesting new gene)‐type ubiquitin‐protein ligases (E3) Pex2p as well as Pex10p. Monoubiquitination of Pex18p depends on the E2 enzyme Pex4p (Ubc10p), which functions in concert with the E3 enzymes Pex12p and Pex10p. Our findings for the PTS2‐pathway complement the data on PTS1‐receptor ubiquitination and add up to a unified concept of the ubiquitin‐based regulation of peroxisomal import .     

Characterization of a temperature-sensitive mutant of a ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme and its use as a heat-inducible degradation signal.

The ubiquitin/proteasome pathway is a highly conserved mechanism of proteolysis in all eukaryotes. Ubiquitin (Ub) is conjugated to proteolytic substrates through the sequential action of ubiquitin-activating (E1/Uba) and ubiquitin-conjugating (E2/Ubc) enzymes. The mechanism of substrate recognition and ubiquitination is an area of active investigation, and we have begun a site-directed mutagenesis approach to define the biochemical and biophysical properties of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes. We have characterized a specific mutation in Ubc4 (Ubc4(P62S)) which was previously shown to cause a temperature-sensitive growth defect in several other Ubc's. Ubc4(P62S) was rapidly degraded in vivo, contributing to the loss of function. However, reconstitution experiments revealed that the catalytic activity of Ubc4(P62S) was reversibly inactivated at 37 degrees C, demonstrating that the primary defect of Ubc4(P62S) is its inability to form a ubiquitin thioester bond at high temperature. The in vivo defect is compounded by increased susceptibility of Ubc4(P62S) to degradation by the ubiquitin/proteasome pathway. We have exploited the temperature-dependent degradation of the P62S mutant to destabilize an otherwise stable test protein (glutathione S-transferase). The use of this mutant may provide a useful cis-acting temperature-inducible degradation signal.     

An efficient system to detect protein ubiquitination by agroinfiltration in Nicotiana benthamiana

The ubiquitination proteasome pathway has been demonstrated to regulate all plant developmental and signaling processes. E3 ligase/substrate‐specific interactions and ubiquitination play important roles in this pathway. However, due to technical limitations only a few instances of E3 ligase–substrate binding and protein ubiquitination in plants have been directly evidenced. An efficient in vivo and in vitro ubiquitination assay was developed for analysis of protein ubiquitination reactions by agroinfiltration expression of both substrates and E3 ligases in Nicotiana benthamiana. Using a detailed analysis of the well‐known E3 ligase COP1 and its substrate HY5, we demonstrated that this assay allows for fast and reliable detection of the specific interaction between the substrate and the E3 ligase, as well as the effects of MG132 and substrate ubiquitination and degradation. We were able to differentiate between the original and ubiquitinated forms of the substrate in vivo with antibodies to ubiquitin or to the target protein. We also demonstrated that the substrate and E3 ligase proteins expressed by agroinfiltration can be applied to analyze ubiquitination in in vivo or in vitro reactions. In addition, we optimized the conditions for different types of substrate and E3 ligase expression by supplementation with the gene‐silencing suppressor p19 and by time‐courses of sample collection. Finally, by testing different protein extraction buffers, we found that different types of buffer should be used for different ubiquitination analyses. This method should be adaptable to other protein modification studies.     

Chemical shift assignments for <Emphasis Type="Italic">S. cerevisiae</Emphasis> Ubc13

The ubiquitination pathway controls several human cellular processes, most notably protein degradation. Ubiquitin, a small signaling protein, is activated by the E1 activating enzyme, transferred to an E2 conjugating enzyme, and then attached to a target substrate through a process that can be facilitated by an E3 ligase enzyme. The enzymatic mechanism of ubiquitin transfer from the E2 conjugating enzyme onto substrate is not clear. The highly conserved HPN motif in E2 catalytic domains is generally thought to help stabilize an oxyanion intermediate formed during ubiquitin transfer. However recent work suggests this motif is instead involved in a structural, non-enzymatic role. As a platform to better understand the E2 catalyzed ubiquitin transfer mechanism, we determined the chemical shift assignments of S. cerevisiae E2 enzyme Ubc13.     

Lysine 63‐linked polyubiquitin chain may serve as a targeting signal for the 26S proteasome

Recruitment of substrates to the 26S proteasome usually requires covalent attachment of the Lys48‐linked polyubiquitin chain. In contrast, modifications with the Lys63‐linked polyubiquitin chain and/or monomeric ubiquitin are generally thought to function in proteasome‐independent cellular processes. Nevertheless, the ubiquitin chain‐type specificity for the proteasomal targeting is still poorly understood, especially in vivo. Using mass spectrometry, we found that Rsp5, a ubiquitin‐ligase in budding yeast, catalyzes the formation of Lys63‐linked ubiquitin chains in vitro. Interestingly, the 26S proteasome degraded well the Lys63‐linked ubiquitinated substrate in vitro. To examine whether Lys63‐linked ubiquitination serves in degradation in vivo, we investigated the ubiquitination of Mga2‐p120, a substrate of Rsp5. The polyubiquitinated p120 contained relatively high levels of Lys63‐linkages, and the Lys63‐linked chains were sufficient for the proteasome‐binding and subsequent p120‐processing. In addition, Lys63‐linked chains as well as Lys48‐linked chains were detected in the 26S proteasome‐bound polyubiquitinated proteins. These results raise the possibility that Lys63‐linked ubiquitin chain also serves as a targeting signal for the 26S proteaseome in vivo.     

Structure and evolutionary conservation of the plant N‐end rule pathway

The N‐end rule relates the in vivo half‐life of a protein to the identity of its N‐terminal amino acid residue. While some N‐terminal residues result in metabolically stable proteins, other, so‐called destabilizing residues, lead to rapid protein turnover. The N‐end rule pathway, which mediates the recognition and degradation of proteins with N‐terminal destabilizing residues, is present in all organisms examined, including prokaryotes. This protein degradation pathway has a hierarchical organization in which some N‐terminal residues, called primary destabilizing residues, are directly recognized by specific ubiquitin ligases. Other destabilizing residues, termed secondary and tertiary destabilizing residues, require modifications before the corresponding proteins can be targeted for degradation by ubiquitin ligases. In eukaryotes, the N‐end rule pathway is a part of the ubiquitin/proteasome system and is known to play essential roles in a broad range of biological processes in fungi, animals and plants. While the structure of the N‐end rule pathway has been extensively studied in yeast and mammals, knowledge of its organization in plants is limited. Using both tobacco and Arabidopsis, we identified the complete sets destabilizing and stabilizing N‐terminal residues. We also characterized the hierarchical organization of the plant N‐end rule by identifying and determining the specificity of two distinct N‐terminal amidohydrolases (Nt‐amidases) of Arabidopsis that are essential for the destabilizing activity of the tertiary destabilizing residues Asn and Gln. Our results indicate that both the N‐end rule itself and mechanistic aspects of the N‐end rule pathway in angiosperms are very similar to those of mammals.     

Shortening a loop can increase protein native state entropy

Protein loops are essential structural elements that influence not only function but also protein stability and folding rates. It was recently reported that shortening a loop in the AcP protein may increase its native state conformational entropy. This effect on the entropy of the folded state can be much larger than the lower entropic penalty of ordering a shorter loop upon folding, and can therefore result in a more pronounced stabilization than predicted by polymer model for loop closure entropy. In this study, which aims at generalizing the effect of loop length shortening on native state dynamics, we use all‐atom molecular dynamics simulations to study how gradual shortening a very long or solvent‐exposed loop region in four different proteins can affect their stability. For two proteins, AcP and Ubc7, we show an increase in native state entropy in addition to the known effect of the loop length on the unfolded state entropy. However, for two permutants of SH3 domain, shortening a loop results only with the expected change in the entropy of the unfolded state, which nicely reproduces the observed experimental stabilization. Here, we show that an increase in the native state entropy following loop shortening is not unique to the AcP protein, yet nor is it a general rule that applies to all proteins following the truncation of any loop. This modification of the loop length on the folded state and on the unfolded state may result with a greater effect on protein stability. Proteins 2015; 83:2137–2146. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Crystal structure of the cyclin-specific ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme from clam, E2-C, at 2.0 A resolution.

The destruction of the cyclin B protein is necessary for the cell to exit from mitosis. The destruction of cyclin B occurs via the ubiquitin/proteasome system and involves a specific ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (Ubc) that donates ubiquitin to cyclin B. Here we present the crystal structure of the cyclin-specific Ubc from clam, E2-C, determined at 2.0 A resolution. The E2-C enzyme contains an N-terminal extension in addition to the Ubc core domain. The N-terminal extension is disordered, perhaps reflecting a need for flexibility as it interacts with various partners in the ubiquitination system. The overall structure of the E2-C core domain is quite similar to those in previously determined Ubc proteins. The interaction between particular pairs of E2-C proteins in the crystal has some of the hallmarks of a functional dimer, though solution studies suggest that the E2-C protein exists as a monomer. Comparison of the E2-C structure with that of the other available Ubc structures indicates conserved surface residues that may interact with common components of the ubiquitination system. Such comparison also reveals a remarkable spine of conserved hydrophobic residues in the center of the protein that may drive the protein to fold and stabilize the protein once folded. Comparison of residues conserved only among E2-C and its homologues indicates surface areas that may be involved in mitotic-specific ubiquitination.     

Endo‐lysosomal sorting of G‐protein‐coupled receptors by ubiquitin: Diverse pathways for G‐protein‐coupled receptor destruction and beyond

Ubiquitin is covalently attached to substrate proteins in the form of a single ubiquitin moiety or polyubiquitin chains and has been generally linked to protein degradation, however, distinct types of ubiquitin linkages are also used to control other critical cellular processes like cell signaling. Over forty mammalian G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been reported to be ubiquitinated, but despite the diverse and rich complexity of GPCR signaling, ubiquitin has been largely ascribed to receptor degradation. Indeed, GPCR ubiquitination targets the receptors for degradation by lysosome, which is mediated by the Endosomal Sorting Complexes Required for Transport (ESCRT) machinery, and the proteasome. This has led to the view that ubiquitin and ESCRTs primarily function as the signal to target GPCRs for destruction. Contrary to this conventional view, studies indicate that ubiquitination of certain GPCRs and canonical ubiquitin‐binding ESCRTs are not required for receptor degradation and revealed that diverse and complex pathways exist to regulate endo‐lysosomal sorting of GPCRs. In other studies, GPCR ubiquitination has been shown to drive signaling and not receptor degradation and further revealed novel insight into the mechanisms by which GPCRs trigger the activity of the ubiquitination machinery. Here, we discuss the diverse pathways by which ubiquitin controls GPCR endo‐lysosomal sorting and beyond.      

Deletion of dop in Mycobacterium smegmatis abolishes pupylation of protein substrates in vivo

Proteasome‐bearing bacteria make use of a ubiquitin‐like modification pathway to target proteins for proteasomal turnover. In a process termed pupylation, proteasomal substrates are covalently modified with the small protein Pup that serves as a degradation signal. Pup is attached to substrate proteins by action of PafA. Prior to its attachment, Pup needs to undergo deamidation at its C‐terminal residue, converting glutamine to glutamate. This step is catalysed in vitro by Dop. In order to characterize Dop activity in vivo, we generated a dop deletion mutant in Mycobacterium smegmatis. In the Δdop strain, pupylation is severely impaired and the steady‐state levels of two known proteasomal substrates are drastically increased. Pupylation can be re‐established by complementing the mutant with either DopWt or a Pup variant carrying a glutamate at its ultimate C‐terminal position (PupGGE). Our data show that Pup is deamidated by Dop in vivo and that likely Dop alone is responsible for this activity. Furthermore, we demonstrate that a putative N‐terminal ATP‐binding motif is crucial for catalysis, as a single point mutation (E10A) in this motif abolishes Dop activity both in vivo and in vitro.     

APC2 Cullin Protein and APC11 RING Protein Comprise the Minimal Ubiquitin Ligase Module of the Anaphase-promoting Complex

In mitosis, the anaphase-promoting complex (APC) regulates the onset of sister-chromatid separation and exit from mitosis by mediating the ubiquitination and degradation of the securin protein and mitotic cyclins. With the use of a baculoviral expression system, we have reconstituted the ubiquitin ligase activity of human APC. In combination with Ubc4 or UbcH10, a heterodimeric complex of APC2 and APC11 is sufficient to catalyze the ubiquitination of human securin and cyclin B1. However, the minimal APC2/11 ubiquitin ligase module does not possess substrate specificity, because it also ubiquitinates the destruction box deletion mutants of securin and cyclin B1. Both APC11 and UbcH10 bind to the C-terminal cullin homology domain of APC2, whereas Ubc4 interacts with APC11 directly. Zn(2+)-binding and mutagenesis experiments indicate that APC11 binds Zn(2+) at a 1:3 M ratio. Unlike the two Zn(2+) ions of the canonical RING-finger motif, the third Zn(2+) ion of APC11 is not essential for its ligase activity. Surprisingly, with Ubc4 as the E2 enzyme, Zn(2+) ions alone are sufficient to catalyze the ubiquitination of cyclin B1. Therefore, the Zn(2+) ions of the RING finger family of ubiquitin ligases may be directly involved in catalysis.     

A short motif in Arabidopsis CDK inhibitor ICK1 decreases the protein level,probably through a ubiquitin‐independent mechanism

The ICK/KRP family of cyclin‐dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors modulates the activity of plant CDKs through protein binding. Previous work has shown that changing the levels of ICK/KRP proteins by overexpression or downregulation affects cell proliferation and plant growth, and also that the ubiquitin proteasome system is involved in degradation of ICK/KRPs. We show in this study that the region encompassing amino acids 21 to 40 is critical for ICK1 levels in both Arabidopsis and yeast. To determine how degradation of ICK1 is controlled, we analyzed the accumulation of hemagglutinin (HA) epitope‐tagged ICK1 proteins in yeast mutants defective for two ubiquitin E3 ligases. The highest level of HA‐ICK1 protein was observed when both the N‐terminal 1–40 sequence was removed and the SCF (SKP1–Cullin1–F‐box complex) function disrupted, suggesting the involvement of both SCF‐dependent and SCF‐independent mechanisms in the degradation of ICK1 in yeast. A short motif consisting of residues 21–30 is sufficient to render green fluorescent protein (GFP) unstable in plants and had a similar effect in plants regardless of whether it was fused to the N‐terminus or C‐terminus of GFP. Furthermore, results from a yeast ubiquitin receptor mutant rpn10Δ indicate that protein ubiquitination is not critical in the degradation of GFP‐ICK1^1–40 in yeast. These results thus identify a protein‐destabilizing sequence motif that does not contain a typical ubiquitination residue, suggesting that it probably functions through an SCF‐independent mechanism.     

In vivo action of the HRD ubiquitin ligase complex: mechanisms of endoplasmic reticulum quality control and sterol regulation

Ubiquitination is used to target both normal proteins for specific regulated degradation and misfolded proteins for purposes of quality control destruction. Ubiquitin ligases, or E3 proteins, promote ubiquitination by effecting the specific transfer of ubiquitin from the correct ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme, or E2 protein, to the target substrate. Substrate specificity is usually determined by specific sequence determinants, or degrons, in the target substrate that are recognized by the ubiquitin ligase. In quality control, however, a potentially vast collection of proteins with characteristic hallmarks of misfolding or misassembly are targeted with high specificity despite the lack of any sequence similarity between substrates. In order to understand the mechanisms of quality control ubiquitination, we have focused our attention on the first characterized quality control ubiquitin ligase, the HRD complex, which is responsible for the endoplasmic reticulum (ER)-associated degradation (ERAD) of numerous ER-resident proteins. Using an in vivo cross-linking assay, we directly examined the association of the separate HRD complex components with various ERAD substrates. We have discovered that the HRD ubiquitin ligase complex associates with both ERAD substrates and stable proteins, but only mediates ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme association with ERAD substrates. Our studies with the sterol pathway-regulated ERAD substrate Hmg2p, an isozyme of the yeast cholesterol biosynthetic enzyme HMG-coenzyme A reductase (HMGR), indicated that the HRD complex discerns between a degradation-competent "misfolded" state and a stable, tightly folded state. Thus, it appears that the physiologically regulated, HRD-dependent degradation of HMGR is effected by a programmed structural transition from a stable protein to a quality control substrate.     

Pex10p functions as an E3 ligase for the Ubc4p-dependent ubiquitination of Pex5p

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae (Sc) PTS1 import receptor Pex5p is modified by ubiquitin, both in an Ubc4p-dependent and a Pex4p (Ubc10p)-dependent manner. Both of these modifications require the RING domain-containing protein Pex10p in vivo, but the actual role this protein plays in the ubiquitination of Pex5p has so far, remained enigmatic. Here, we report that the RING domain of Pex10p exhibits E₃ ligase activity in vitro, in combination with the human E₂ enzyme UbcH5a, a homologue of ScUbc4p, but not when ScPex4p was used as an E₂ enzyme in the reaction. We have further characterised Pex10p’s E₃ ligase activity using mutants designed to disturb this activity and show that Pex10p acts as the E₃ ligase for Ubc4p-dependent ubiquitination of Pex5p but not Pex4p-dependent ubiquitination in vivo. These data imply that the two distinct Pex5p modifications require different E₃ ligases, as well as different E₂ enzymes.     

Endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation mediated by MoHrd1 and MoDer1 is pivotal for appressorium development and pathogenicity of Magnaporthe oryzae

Most secretory proteins are folded and modified in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER); however, protein folding is error-prone, resulting in toxic protein aggregation and cause ER stress. Irreversibly misfolded proteins are subjected to ER-associated degradation (ERAD), modified by ubiquitination, and degraded by the 26S proteasome. The yeast ERAD ubiquitin ligase Hrd1p and multispanning membrane protein Der1p are involved in ubiquitination and transportation of the folding-defective proteins. Here, we performed functional characterization of MoHrd1 and MoDer1 and revealed that both of them are localized to the ER and are pivotal for ERAD substrate degradation and the ER stress response. MoHrd1 and MoDer1 are involved in hyphal growth, asexual reproduction, infection-related morphogenesis, protein secretion and pathogenicity of M. oryzae. Importantly, MoHrd1 and MoDer1 mediated conidial autophagic cell death and subsequent septin ring assembly at the appressorium pore, leading to abnormal appressorium development and loss of pathogenicity. In addition, deletion of MoHrd1 and MoDer1 activated the basal unfolded protein response (UPR) and autophagy, suggesting that crosstalk between ERAD and two other closely related mechanisms in ER quality control system (UPR and autophagy) governs the ER stress response. Our study indicates the importance of ERAD function in fungal development and pathogenesis of M. oryzae.     

Degradation for better survival? Role of ubiquitination in epithelial morphogenesis

As a prevalent post‐translational modification, ubiquitination is essential for many developmental processes. Once covalently attached to the small and conserved polypeptide ubiquitin (Ub), a substrate protein can be directed to perform specific biological functions via its Ub‐modified form. Three sequential catalytic reactions contribute to this process, among which E3 ligases serve to identify target substrates and promote the activated Ub to conjugate to substrate proteins. Ubiquitination has great plasticity, with diverse numbers, topologies and modifications of Ub chains conjugated at different substrate residues adding a layer of complexity that facilitates a huge range of cellular functions. Herein, we highlight key advances in the understanding of ubiquitination in epithelial morphogenesis, with an emphasis on the latest insights into its roles in cellular events involved in polarized epithelial tissue, including cell adhesion, asymmetric localization of polarity determinants and cytoskeletal organization. In addition, the physiological roles of ubiquitination are discussed for typical examples of epithelial morphogenesis, such as lung branching, vascular development and synaptic formation and plasticity. Our increased understanding of ubiquitination in epithelial morphogenesis may provide novel insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying epithelial regeneration and maintenance.     

A conserved cysteine is essential for Pex4p-dependent ubiquitination of the peroxisomal import receptor Pex5p

The peroxisomal protein import receptor Pex5p is modified by ubiquitin, both in an Ubc4p-dependent and -independent manner. Here we show that the two types of ubiquitination target different residues in the NH(2)-terminal region of Pex5p and we identify Pex4p (Ubc10p) as the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme required for Ubc4p-independent ubiquitination. Whereas Ubc4p-dependent ubiquitination occurs on two lysine residues, Pex4p-dependent ubiquitination neither requires lysine residues nor the NH(2)-terminal alpha-NH(2) group. Instead, a conserved cysteine residue appears to be essential for both the Pex4p-dependent ubiquitination and the overall function of Pex5p. In addition, we show that this form of ubiquitinated Pex5p is susceptible to the reducing agent beta-mercaptoethanol, a compound that is unable to break ubiquitin-NH(2) group linkages. Together, our results strongly suggest that Pex4p-dependent ubiquitination of Pex5p occurs on a cysteine residue.     

The Ubc3 (Cdc34) ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme is ubiquitinated and phosphorylated in vivo.

The transition from G1 to S phase of the cell cycle in Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires the activity of the Ubc3 (Cdc34) ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme. S. cerevisiae cells lacking a functional UBC3 (CDC34) gene are able to execute the Start function that initiates the cell cycle but fail to form a mitotic spindle or enter S phase. The Ubc3 (Cdc34) enzyme has previously been shown to catalyze the attachment of multiple ubiquitin molecules to model substrates, suggesting that the role of this enzyme in cell cycle progression depends on its targeting an endogenous protein(s) for degradation. In this report, we demonstrate that the Ubc3 (Cdc34) protein is itself a substrate for both ubiquitination and phosphorylation. Immunochemical localization of the gene product to the nucleus renders it likely that the relevant substrates similarly reside within the nucleus.