Why does mutation of Gln61 in Ras by the nitro analog NGln maintain activity of Ras‐GAP in hydrolysis of guanosine triphosphate?

Interpretation of the experiments showing that the Ras‐GAP protein complex maintains activity in guanosine triphosphate (GTP) hydrolysis upon replacement of Glu61 in Ras with its unnatural nitro analog, NGln, is an important issue for understanding details of chemical transformations at the enzyme active site. By using molecular modeling we demonstrate that both glutamine and its nitro analog in the aci‐nitro form participate in the reaction of GTP hydrolysis at the stages of proton transfer and formation of inorganic phosphate. The computed structures and the energy profiles for the complete pathway from the enzyme‐substrate to enzyme‐product complexes for the wild‐type and mutated Ras suggest that the reaction mechanism is not affected by this mutation. Proteins 2015; 83:2091–2099. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Unravelling the mechanism of dual‐specificity GAPs

The molecular mechanism by which dual‐specificity RasGAPs of the Gap1 subfamily activate the GTP hydrolysis of both Rap and Ras is an unresolved phenomenon. RasGAPs and RapGAPs use different strategies to stimulate the GTPase reaction of their cognate G‐proteins. RasGAPs contribute an arginine finger to orient through the Gln61 of Ras the nucleophilic water molecule. RapGAP contributes an asparagine (Asn thumb) into the active site to substitute for the missing Gln61. Here, by using steady‐state kinetic assays and time‐resolved Fourier‐transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) experiments with wild type and mutant proteins, we unravel the remarkable mechanism for the specificity switch. The plasticity of GAP1^IP4BP and RASAL is mediated by the extra GTPase‐activating protein (GAP) domains, which promote a different orientation of Ras and Rap's switch‐II and catalytic residues in the active site. Thereby, Gln63 in Rap adopts the catalytic role normally taken by Gln61 of Ras. This re‐orientation requires specific interactions between switch‐II of Rap and helix‐α6 of GAPs. This supports the notion that the specificities of fl proteins versus GAP domains are potentially different.     

Structural fingerprints of the Ras-GTPase activating proteins neurofibromin and p120GAP

Ras specific GTPase activating proteins (GAPs), neurofibromin and p120GAP, bind GTP bound Ras and efficiently complement its active site. Here we present comparative data from mutations and fluorescence-based assays of the catalytic domains of both RasGAPs and interpret them using the crystal structures. Three prominent regions in RasGAPs, the arginine-finger loop, the phenylalanine-leucine-arginine (FLR) region and alpha7/variable loop contain structural fingerprints governing the GAP function. The finger loop is crucial for the stabilization of the transition state of the GTPase reaction. This function is controlled by residues proximal to the catalytic arginine, which are strikingly different between the two RasGAPs. These residues specifically determine the orientation and therefore the positioning of the arginine finger in the Ras active site. The invariant FLR region, a hallmark for RasGAPs, indirectly contributes to GTPase stimulation by forming a scaffold, which stabilizes Ras switch regions. We show that a long hydrophobic side-chain in the FLR region is crucial for this function. The alpha7/variable loop uses several conserved residues including two lysine residues, which are involved in numerous interactions with the switch I region of Ras. This region determines the specificity of the Ras-RasGAP interaction.     

Insights into protein-protein binding by binding free energy calculation and free energy decomposition for the Ras-Raf and Ras-RalGDS complexes

Absolute binding free energy calculations and free energy decompositions are presented for the protein-protein complexes H-Ras/C-Raf1 and H-Ras/RalGDS. Ras is a central switch in the regulation of cell proliferation and differentiation. In our study, we investigate the capability of the molecular mechanics (MM)-generalized Born surface area (GBSA) approach to estimate absolute binding free energies for the protein-protein complexes. Averaging gas-phase energies, solvation free energies, and entropic contributions over snapshots extracted from trajectories of the unbound proteins and the complexes, calculated binding free energies (Ras-Raf: -15.0(+/-6.3)kcal mol(-1); Ras-RalGDS: -19.5(+/-5.9)kcal mol(-1)) are in fair agreement with experimentally determined values (-9.6 kcal mol(-1); -8.4 kcal mol(-1)), if appropriate ionic strength is taken into account. Structural determinants of the binding affinity of Ras-Raf and Ras-RalGDS are identified by means of free energy decomposition. For the first time, computationally inexpensive generalized Born (GB) calculations are applied in this context to partition solvation free energies along with gas-phase energies between residues of both binding partners. For selected residues, in addition, entropic contributions are estimated by classical statistical mechanics. Comparison of the decomposition results with experimentally determined binding free energy differences for alanine mutants of interface residues yielded correlations with r(2)=0.55 and 0.46 for Ras-Raf and Ras-RalGDS, respectively. Extension of the decomposition reveals residues as far apart as 25A from the binding epitope that can contribute significantly to binding free energy. These "hotspots" are found to show large atomic fluctuations in the unbound proteins, indicating that they reside in structurally less stable regions. Furthermore, hotspot residues experience a significantly larger-than-average decrease in local fluctuations upon complex formation. Finally, by calculating a pair-wise decomposition of interactions, interaction pathways originating in the binding epitope of Raf are found that protrude through the protein structure towards the loop L1. This explains the finding of a conformational change in this region upon complex formation with Ras, and it may trigger a larger structural change in Raf, which is considered to be necessary for activation of the effector by Ras.     

Free energies and equilibria of peptide bond hydrolysis and formation

For every n amino acids linked in a protein there are n − 1 peptide bonds. The free energy of peptide bond hydrolysis and formation in aqueous solution defines the equilibrium position between peptide and amino acid hydrolysis products. Yet few experimental values exist. With a minimum of assumptions, this paper deduces the free energies of hydrolysis of a variety of peptide bonds. Formation of a dipeptide from two amino acids is about eight times more difficult than subsequent condensations of an amino acid to a dipeptide or longer chain. Condensation of an amino acid to a peptide of any size is five times more difficult than joining two smaller peptides of at least dipeptide size. Thus in an abiogenesis scenario there is a kind of nucleation in peptide bond formation with the initial condensation of two amino acids to yield a dipeptide more difficult than subsequent condensations to a growing chain. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Biopoly 45: 351–353, 1998     

Tissue-specific functions of the Caenorhabditis elegans p120 Ras GTPase activating protein GAP-3

All metazoan genomes encode multiple RAS GTPase activating proteins (RasGAPs) that negatively regulate the conserved RAS/MAPK signaling pathway. In mammals, several RasGAPs exhibit tumor suppressor activity by preventing excess RAS signal transduction. We have identified gap-3 as the to date missing Caenorhabditiselegans member of the p120 RasGAP family. By studying the genetic interaction of gap-3 with the two previously identified RasGAPs gap-1 and gap-2, we find that different combinations of RasGAPs are used to repress LET-60 RAS signaling depending on the cellular context. GAP-3 is the predominant negative regulator of RAS during meiotic progression of the germ cells, while GAP-1 is the key inhibitor of RAS during vulval induction. In other tissues such as the sex myoblasts or the chemosensory neurons, all three RasGAPs act in concert. The C. elegans RasGAPs have thus undergone partial specialization after gene duplication to allow the differential regulation of the RAS/MAPK signaling pathway in different cell types. A similar tissue specialization of the human tumor suppressor genes may explain the strong bias in the type of cancer they promote when mutated.     

酵母酶系合成三磷酸鸟苷的研究

研究了利用啤酒酵母细胞酶系催化鸟苷酸(GMP)合成三磷酸鸟苷(GTP)的工艺过程。采用分式析因及响应面实验设计对其工艺条件进行优化,分析了温度、pH、酵母、无机盐和表面活性剂等因素对GTP积累的影响,得到了一个可以较好预测实际反应的二次方模型以及优化条件即：GMP 7．16g/L,葡萄糖55g/L,酵母270g/L,硫酸氨1．5g/L,硫酸镁2g/L,磷酸二氢钾27．2g/L,表面活性剂8川L,氯化十六烷基吡啶1．5g/L,pH6．74,温度37．4℃。经过优化,反应得率从71．3％增至92．7％,较国内外报道的水平(80％)提高了12．7％.     

Role of the arginine finger in Ras.RasGAP revealed by QM/MM calculations

In the Ras.Ras.GAP complex, hydrolysis of guanosine triphosphate is strongly accelerated GAP as compared to Ras alone. This is largely attributed to the arginine finger R789(GAP) pointing to AlF(x) in the transition state analogue. We performed QM/MM simulations where triphosphate was treated using the quantum mechanical method of density functional theory, while the protein complex and water environment were described classically using MD. Compared to Ras, the crucial electron shift, bond stretching and distortion towards an eclipsed gamma-to-beta orientation are much more pronounced. The arginine finger is shown to act by displacing water out of the binding niche. The resulting enhanced electrostatic field catalyses the cleavage step.