溶瘤病毒的免疫学机制及临床研究进展

溶瘤病毒（oncolytic virus,OVs）历经百年发展,应用于当前最具潜力的肿瘤免疫疗法。它主要是天然的或基因修饰的DNA病毒和RNA病毒。近年来随着基因工程技术的飞跃发展,经基因改造的溶瘤病毒在肿瘤治疗领域取得很大进展,很多不同类型的病毒（包括单纯疱疹病毒、腺病毒、痘病毒、麻疹病毒和呼肠孤病毒等）正处于临床前研究、临床试验阶段或已批准上市,显示了良好的安全性和临床疗效。普遍认为溶瘤病毒靶向杀伤肿瘤细胞是通过选择性在肿瘤细胞内自我复制,最终裂解肿瘤细胞,同时可激发机体的免疫应答反应,进而增强抗肿瘤免疫效果,靶向杀伤肿瘤细胞而对正常细胞无明显影响。运用基因重组技术将溶瘤病毒与免疫检查点相结合以及肿瘤免疫联合疗法的兴起和不断进步,使溶瘤病毒的应用更加广泛,但仍存在病毒靶向性、安全性、给药途径等瓶颈问题。本文综述了溶瘤病毒的发展史、病毒分类、不同类型溶瘤病毒产品的临床研究进展、溶瘤病毒靶向杀伤肿瘤的免疫学机制及未来发展面临的挑战与展望等。     

Lung cancer and oncolytic virotherapy——enemy's enemy

Lung cancer is one of the malignant tumors that seriously threaten human health worldwide, while the covid-19 virus has become people's nightmare after the coronavirus pandemic. There are too many similarities between cancer cells and viruses, one of the most significant is that both of them are our enemies. The strategy to take the advantage of the virus to beat cancer cells is called Oncolytic virotherapy. When immunotherapy represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors has made remarkable breakthroughs in the clinical practice of lung cancer, the induction of antitumor immunity from immune cells gradually becomes a rapidly developing and promising strategy of cancer therapy. Oncolytic virotherapy is based on the same mechanisms that selectively kill tumor cells and induce systemic anti-tumor immunity, but still has a long way to go before it becomes a standard treatment for lung cancer. This article provides a comprehensive review of the latest progress in oncolytic virotherapy for lung cancer, including the specific mechanism of oncolytic virus therapy and the main types of oncolytic viruses, and the combination of oncolytic virotherapy and existing standard treatments. It aims to provide new insights and ideas on oncolytic virotherapy for lung cancer.     

Developing oncolytic viruses for clinical use: A consortium approach

The use of oncolytic viruses forms an appealing approach for cancer treatment. On the one hand the viruses replicate in, and kill, tumor cells, leading to their intra-tumoral amplification. On the other hand the viral infection will activate virus-directed immune responses, and may trigger immune responses directed against tumor cells and tumor antigens. To date, a wide variety of oncolytic viruses is being developed for use in cancer treatment. While the development of oncolytic viruses has often been initiated by researchers in academia and other public institutions, a large majority of the final product development and the testing of these products in clinical trials is industry led. As a consequence relatively few pre-clinical and clinical studies evaluated different oncolytic viruses in competitive side-by-side preclinical or clinical studies. In this review we will summarize the steps and considerations essential in the development and characterization of oncolytic viruses, and describe our multidisciplinary academic consortium, which involves a dozen departments in three different Dutch universities, collaborating in the development of oncolytic viruses. This consortium has the ambition to develop a small series of oncolytic viruses and to evaluate these in various cancers.     

A call to arms: Using RNAi screening to improve oncolytic viral therapy

Replicating virus-based therapeutics for cancer, or oncolytic virus therapy (OVT), is rapidly emerging as a promising treatment modality for a wide range of cancers. In pre-clinical studies, oncolytic viruses have produced remarkable results in a variety of experimental animal models, and several viruses have entered phase I/II clinical trials. However, OVT is not effective against all tumours, with major treatment bottlenecks being the inability to infect, replicate within, or kill certain cancer cells. Unfortunately, the underlying molecular mechanisms governing these limitations are largely unknown. Recently, RNAi technology has been adapted for systematic interrogation of entire eukaryotic genomes. Since then, several groups have conducted genome-wide RNAi screens to study host/virus interactions. Herein we briefly summarize RNAi screening and its recent application to virology, and propose its use in overcoming key barriers to successful OVT.     

Kinase inhibitors with viral oncolysis: Unmasking pharmacoviral approaches for cancer therapy

There are more than 500 kinases in the human genome, many of which are oncogenic once constitutively activated. Fortunately, numerous hyperactive kinases are druggable, and several targeted small molecule kinase inhibitors have demonstrated impressive clinical benefits in cancer treatment. However, their often cytostatic rather than cytotoxic effect on cancer cells, and the development of resistance mechanisms, remain significant limitations to these targeted therapies. Oncolytic viruses are an emerging class of immunotherapeutic agents with a specific oncotropic nature and excellent safety profile, highlighting them as a promising alternative to conventional therapeutic modalities. Nonetheless, the clinical efficacy of oncolytic virotherapy is challenged by immunological and physical barriers that limit viral delivery, replication, and spread within tumours. Several of these barriers are often associated with oncogenic kinase activity and, in some cases, worsened by the action of oncolytic viruses on kinase signaling during infection. What if inhibiting these kinases could potentiate the cancer-lytic and anti-tumour immune stimulating properties of oncolytic virotherapies? This could represent a paradigm shift in the use of specific kinase inhibitors in the clinic and provide a novel therapeutic approach to the treatment of cancers. A phase III clinical trial combining the oncolytic Vaccinia virus Pexa-Vec with the kinase inhibitor Sorafenib was initiated. While this trial failed to show any benefits over Sorafenib monotherapy in patients with advanced liver cancer, several pre-clinical studies demonstrate that targeting kinases combined with oncolytic viruses have synergistic effects highlighting this strategy as a unique avenue to cancer therapy. Herein, we review the combinations of oncolytic viruses with kinase inhibitors reported in the literature and discuss the clinical opportunities that represent these pharmacoviral approaches.     

Cancer and viruses: a double-edged sword

Oncovirus, synonymously called a 'tumour virus', is a virus that can cause cancer. An oncolytic virus preferentially infects the host's cancer cells and lyses them, causing tumour destruction, and is thus referred to as a 'cancer killing virus'. With an estimated 11% of cancer-associated deaths caused by oncoviruses and the possibility that many cancers may be treated by using oncolytic viruses, the role of viruses in cancer may be viewed as a double-edged sword. A total of seven human cancer viruses have been identified as oncoviruses, having been associated with various cancers. Conversely, a large number of oncolytic viruses have shown great potential towards the treatment of certain types of cancer. Proteomics has now been applied towards understanding the complex interplay that exists between oncoviruses and the immune responses that serve to prevent oncoviral diseases. This review attempts to summarise the neoplastic potential of human tumour associated viruses and associated vaccine successes. The potential use of oncolytic viruses for the therapeutic intervention of cancer will also be discussed. Finally, this review will discuss the enormous potential of proteomics technology in the field of oncovirology.     

Mechanisms of measles virus oncolytic immunotherapy

The study of measles virus (MeV) as a cancer immunotherapeutic was prompted by clinical observations of leukemia and lymphoma regressions in patients following measles virus infection in the 1970s and 1980s. Since then, numerous preclinical studies have confirmed the oncolytic activity of MeV vaccine strains as well as their potential to promote long-lasting tumor-specific immune responses. Early clinical data indicate that some of these effects may translate to the treatment of cancer patients. In this review, we provide a structured summary of current evidence for the anti-tumor immune activity of oncolytic MeV. We start with an overview of MeV oncolysis and MeV-induced immunogenic cell death. Next, we relate findings on MeV-mediated activation of antigen-presenting cells, T cell priming and effector mechanisms to the cancer immunity cycle. We discuss additional factors in the tumor microenvironment which are modulated by MeV treatment as well as the role of anti-viral immunity. Based on these findings, we highlight avenues for rational enhancement of oncolytic MeV immunotherapy by vector engineering. We further point to advantages and drawbacks of experimental models and propose areas warranting promising research. Lastly, we review the available immunomonitoring data from several Phase I clinical trials. While this review presents data for MeV, the concepts and principles introduced herein apply to other oncolytic viruses, providing a framework to assess novel cancer immunotherapies.     

Oncolytic adenoviruses in anticancer therapy: Current status and prospects

Lytic virus infection results in production of a virus progeny and lysis of the infected cell. Tumor cells are usually more sensitive to virus infection. Studies indicate that viral oncolysis provides a promising alternative approach to cancer therapy. The ability of viruses to selectively kill cancer cells is long known, but construction of virus variants with an improved therapeutic potential was impossible until recent advances in virus and cell molecular biology and the development of modern methods for directed modification of viruses. Adenoviruses are one of the best studied models of oncolytic viruses. These DNA viruses are convenient for genetic manipulation and show minimal pathogenicity. The review summarizes the data on the directions and approaches to generation of highly efficient variants of oncolytic adenoviruses. The approaches include introduction of directed genetic modifications into the virus genome, accelerated selection of oncolytic virus variants following treatment with mutagens, the use of adenoviruses as vectors to introduce therapeutic gene products, optimization of viral delivery systems, minimization of the negative effects from the host immune system, etc. The dynamic development of studies in the field holds promise that many variants of oncolytic adenoviruses will find clinical application in the nearest future.     

Determinants of the efficacy of viro-immunotherapy: A review

Oncolytic virus immunotherapy is rapidly gaining interest in the field of immunotherapy against cancer. The minimal toxicity upon treatment and the dual activity of direct oncolysis and immune activation make therapy with oncolytic viruses (OVs) an interesting treatment modality. The safety and efficacy of several OVs have been assessed in clinical trials and, so far, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved one OV. Unfortunately, most treatments with OVs have shown suboptimal responses in clinical trials, while they appeared more promising in preclinical studies, with tumours reducing after immune cell influx. In several clinical trials with OVs, parameters such as virus replication, virus-specific antibodies, systemic immune responses, immune cell influx into tumours and tumour-specific antibodies have been studied as predictors or correlates of therapy efficacy. In this review, these studies are summarized to improve our understanding of the determinants of the efficacy of OV therapies in humans and to provide insights for future developments in the viro-immunotherapy treatment field.     

Towards Predictive Computational Models of Oncolytic Virus Therapy: Basis for Experimental Validation and Model Selection

Oncolytic viruses are viruses that specifically infect cancer cells and kill them, while leaving healthy cells largely intact. Their ability to spread through the tumor makes them an attractive therapy approach. While promising results have been observed in clinical trials, solid success remains elusive since we lack understanding of the basic principles that govern the dynamical interactions between the virus and the cancer. In this respect, computational models can help experimental research at optimizing treatment regimes. Although preliminary mathematical work has been performed, this suffers from the fact that individual models are largely arbitrary and based on biologically uncertain assumptions. Here, we present a general framework to study the dynamics of oncolytic viruses that is independent of uncertain and arbitrary mathematical formulations. We find two categories of dynamics, depending on the assumptions about spatial constraints that govern that spread of the virus from cell to cell. If infected cells are mixed among uninfected cells, there exists a viral replication rate threshold beyond which tumor control is the only outcome. On the other hand, if infected cells are clustered together (e.g. in a solid tumor), then we observe more complicated dynamics in which the outcome of therapy might go either way, depending on the initial number of cells and viruses. We fit our models to previously published experimental data and discuss aspects of model validation, selection, and experimental design. This framework can be used as a basis for model selection and validation in the context of future, more detailed experimental studies. It can further serve as the basis for future, more complex models that take into account other clinically relevant factors such as immune responses.     

Combining oncolytic virotherapy and tumour vaccination

The interactions between the immune system, a malignant tumour and an oncolytic virus are complex and poorly understood. For oncolytic viruses to become successful therapeutics we need to better understand these interactions and identify strategies to take advantage of defects in the innate immune response within tumours and avoid cellular anti-viral responses while capitalizing on anti-tumoural immunity. In this review we will discuss the evidence for the induction of tumour-specific immune responses by oncolytic viruses as well as by cancer vaccines. We will then describe some of the barriers to successful cancer immunotherapy, and finally we will outline a strategy for enhancing anti-tumoural immunity while reducing anti-viral immunity by combining tumour vaccination with oncolytic viral therapy.     

The In Vivo Therapeutic Efficacy of the Oncolytic Adenovirus Delta24-RGD Is Mediated by Tumor-Specific Immunity

The oncolytic adenovirus Delta24-RGD represents a new promising therapeutic agent for patients with a malignant glioma and is currently under investigation in clinical phase I/II trials. Earlier preclinical studies showed that Delta24-RGD is able to effectively lyse tumor cells, yielding promising results in various immune-deficient glioma models. However, the role of the immune response in oncolytic adenovirus therapy for glioma has never been explored. To this end, we assessed Delta24-RGD treatment in an immune-competent orthotopic mouse model for glioma and evaluated immune responses against tumor and virus. Delta24-RGD treatment led to long-term survival in 50% of mice and this effect was completely lost upon administration of the immunosuppressive agent dexamethasone. Delta24-RGD enhanced intra-tumoral infiltration of F4/80+ macrophages, CD4+ and CD8+ T-cells, and increased the local production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. In treated mice, T cell responses were directed to the virus as well as to the tumor cells, which was reflected in the presence of protective immunological memory in mice that underwent tumor rechallenge. Together, these data provide evidence that the immune system plays a vital role in the therapeutic efficacy of oncolytic adenovirus therapy of glioma, and may provide angles to future improvements on Delta24-RGD therapy.     

Oncolytic viruses: what to expect from their use in cancer treatment

Oncolytic viruses are biologic agents able to selectively infect and destroy cancer cells while sparing the normal ones. Furthermore, they also stimulate the host immune system to combat the tumor growth and to promote tumor removal. This review thoroughly describes different types of viruses developed for targeting specific cancers, as well as the strategies to improve the efficacy and safety of oncolytic virotherapy. It also explores how their potential as anticancer agents may be enhanced through combination with other traditional therapies, such as chemotherapy or more recent approaches, such as checkpoint inhibitors. There are many oncolytic viruses currently being tested in clinical trials for the treatment of various types of cancer, suggesting that this approach could become the near future of the oncology field.     

溶瘤病毒靶向治疗肿瘤的策略

近年来,随着国内外几款溶瘤病毒制剂的相继上市,溶瘤病毒疗法成为肿瘤免疫治疗的焦点。溶瘤病毒可选择性感染并裂解肿瘤细胞,同时释放肿瘤相关抗原激活机体的抗肿瘤免疫反应,达到杀伤肿瘤细胞和抑制肿瘤生长的目的。溶瘤病毒对肿瘤的靶向杀伤作用决定了其安全性和溶瘤效果。为了开发出安全高效的溶瘤病毒,目前主要采用以下策略：利用某些病毒载体对肿瘤细胞的天然靶向性,使溶瘤病毒选择性地在肿瘤细胞内复制并杀伤肿瘤细胞;或者对病毒基因组进行缺失和插入等修饰,通过靶向肿瘤细胞特异性表面受体、胞内信号通路或者肿瘤微环境等提高溶瘤病毒的肿瘤靶向性。其中,肿瘤微环境中的低氧状态、新血管生成以及免疫抑制状态等都可成为溶瘤病毒的靶点。而溶瘤病毒通过表达细胞因子和免疫检查点抑制剂,或者与CAR-T细胞联合作用,靶向调节肿瘤微环境中免疫抑制状态,成为提高溶瘤病毒肿瘤靶向性的常用方法。本文将对以上溶瘤病毒靶向治疗肿瘤策略的研究进展进行综述。     

靶向宿主代谢重编程的溶瘤病毒调控策略

溶瘤病毒是一类天然的或经过基因编辑后能特异性在肿瘤细胞中复制、发挥抗肿瘤效应的病毒。溶瘤病毒的抗肿瘤效应主要通过以下两个方面实现：a. 直接的溶瘤效应，例如诱导肿瘤细胞发生凋亡、促使细胞裂解等；b. 溶瘤病毒作为一种激活免疫的药物，通过诱导机体产生强烈的抗肿瘤免疫，达到清除肿瘤的目的。溶瘤病毒疗法作为免疫疗法的一个重要分支，因其具有肿瘤特异性，便于基因改造等优点，成为该领域的研究热点。截至目前，处在临床实验招募和完成阶段的溶瘤病毒疗法虽然已达100多例，但已批准上市的产品仅有4款。溶瘤疗法应用于肿瘤治疗领域还面临着诸多挑战。因此，系统性回顾溶瘤病毒的改造策略，深入了解溶瘤病毒的生物学过程显得尤为必要。病毒依赖于宿主完成复制、增殖过程，其生物学过程与宿主的代谢状态密切相关。肿瘤的标志性特征为代谢重编程，即肿瘤细胞重新构建代谢网络以满足指数生长和增殖的需求并防止氧化应激的过程。通常包括糖酵解的增强和谷氨酰胺分解，以及线粒体功能和氧化还原稳态的变化。通过靶向宿主代谢重编程增强溶瘤病毒的复制、溶瘤能力是当前极具前景的方向。本文综述溶瘤病毒的临床应用现状及与代谢相关的调控机制，为进一步开发新型溶瘤病毒以及联用方式提供新的思路。     

Oncolytic viruses in the therapy of gliomas

Despite the modern advances in medicine, cure for malignant glioblastomas remains an elusive goal. Both the invasive nature and the location in vital areas of the brain make this type of tumors difficult to treat surgically, while adjuvant therapy fails to bring the expected results. Frequent recurrence and invasiveness of malignant gliomas are due to the resistance of glioma stem cells to conventional radiation therapy and chemotherapy. Technological achievements in constructing recombinant viruses yielded strains with high oncolytic activity toward glial tumors. Many of these strains have passed Phase I clinical studies and proved to be highly safe. Although the approach is obviously promising, the available strains are not efficacious enough to cure the disease and need further improvement. The review summarizes the results reported for the most successful variants of oncolytic viruses that have come down to clinical trials and discusses the prospects of new approaches to viral therapy of malignant gliomas.     

溶瘤I型单纯疱疹病毒的研究进展

溶瘤病毒(Oncolytic virus,OV)是可以靶向感染并杀伤肿瘤细胞的一类病毒,其中溶瘤I型单纯疱疹病毒(Oncolytic herpes simplex virus type 1,OHSV-1)是目前研究最多的溶瘤病毒之一,可通过多种策略进行构建,已有多种OHSV-1进入临床试验,大量结果显示其具有较好的安全性和有效性。本文主要介绍OHSV-1的分子生物学特性与优势、主要的开发及靶向性策略、各类OHSV-1的研究进展以及目前存在的问题等。     

Novel oncolytic viruses: Riding high on the next wave?

The use of viruses as targeted cancer therapy has shown significant promise, and the list of oncolytic viruses continue to grow. The interest in unexplored viruses as oncolytic agents is a natural corollary to the successes and challenges of those already being examined in the clinical setting. Are these ‘new’ viruses any more effective than their predecessors? What are the benefits of refining current clinical candidates compared to searching for new ones? This review briefly describes some of these novel oncolytic viruses. It also examines the issues that arise in comparing them to each other. We believe that the viral mechanism of action is a key factor to success and suggest guidelines by which all oncolytic virus candidates could be evaluated.     

Cancer selective adenoviruses

Ten years ago Frank McCormick proposed dl1520 as an oncolytic adenovirus. Although great as an inspiration for better oncolytic viruses it was far from a good product. As Onyx-015, it underwent a wish-fulfilling clinical development program seizing the opportunity left by its p53-targeted non-replicative counterpart Ad-p53. Now, facing a skeptical environment, more selective and potent oncolytic adenoviruses await their clinical opportunity. However, advance in key issues remains elusive, such as, selectivity or retargeting at the level of cell receptors to improve pharmacokinetics. Preclinical models and a few clinical data on biodistribution show that only a minimal proportion of the injected dose reaches the tumors after systemic administration. Once in the tumor, the virus must overcome barriers to efficient spread imposed by stroma and immune responses. Arming the oncolytic virus with transgenes is a natural combination of virotherapy and gene therapy strategies. Transgenes that increase virus production or cellular spread may help to overcome these barriers. Cytotoxic transgenes can help to eliminate tumor cells but need to be compatible with efficient virus replication. These challenges require a careful approach to clinical development and a great deal of collaboration to launch clinical tests with a virus backbone that contains intellectual property from multiple sources.