A spatiotemporal characterization of the effect of p53 phosphorylation on its interaction with MDM2

The interaction of p53 and MDM2 is modulated by the phosphorylation of p53. This mechanism is key to activating p53, yet its molecular determinants are not fully understood. To study the spatiotemporal characteristics of this molecular process we carried out Brownian dynamics simulations of the interactions of the MDM2 protein with a p53 peptide in its wild type state and when phosphorylated at Thr18 (pThr18) and Ser20 (pSer20). We found that p53 phosphorylation results in concerted changes in the topology of the interaction landscape in the diffusively bound encounter complex domain. These changes hinder phosphorylated p53 peptides from binding to MDM2 well before reaching the binding site. The underlying mechanism appears to involve shift of the peptide away from the vicinity of the MDM2 protein, peptide reorientation, and reduction in peptide residence time relative to wild-type p53 peptide. pThr18 and pSr20 p53 peptides experience reduction in residence times by factors of 13.6 and 37.5 respectively relative to the wild-type p53 peptide, indicating a greater role for Ser20 phosphorylation in abrogating p53 MDM2 interactions. These detailed insights into the effect of phosphorylation on molecular interactions are not available from conventional experimental and theoretical approaches and open up new avenues that incorporate molecular interaction dynamics, for stabilizing p53 against MDM2, which is a major focus of anticancer drug lead development.     

A spatiotemporal characterization of the effect of p53 phosphorylation on its interaction with MDM2

The interaction of p53 and MDM2 is modulated by the phosphorylation of p53. This mechanism is key to activating p53, yet its molecular determinants are not fully understood. To study the spatiotemporal characteristics of this molecular process we carried out Brownian dynamics simulations of the interactions of the MDM2 protein with a p53 peptide in its wild type state and when phosphorylated at Thr18 (pThr18) and Ser20 (pSer20). We found that p53 phosphorylation results in concerted changes in the topology of the interaction landscape in the diffusively bound encounter complex domain. These changes hinder phosphorylated p53 peptides from binding to MDM2 well before reaching the binding site. The underlying mechanism appears to involve shift of the peptide away from the vicinity of the MDM2 protein, peptide reorientation, and reduction in peptide residence time relative to wild-type p53 peptide. pThr18 and pSr20 p53 peptides experience reduction in residence times by factors of 13.6 and 37.5 respectively relative to the wild-type p53 peptide, indicating a greater role for Ser20 phosphorylation in abrogating p53 MDM2 interactions. These detailed insights into the effect of phosphorylation on molecular interactions are not available from conventional experimental and theoretical approaches and open up new avenues that incorporate molecular interaction dynamics, for stabilizing p53 against MDM2, which is a major focus of anticancer drug lead development.     

Conformational changes of the p53-binding cleft of MDM2 revealed by molecular dynamics simulations

Two 35-ns molecular dynamics simulations of both ligated [mouse double minute protein 2 (MDM2(p53))] and unligated (MDM2(apo)) structures of human MDM2 bound to the N-terminal domain of the tumor suppressor p53 have been performed. Analysis of the dynamics revealed that the most flexible region of MDM2 was the p53-binding cleft. When MDM2 was bound to p53, a wider and more stable topology of the cleft was obtained, while unligated MDM2 showed a narrower and highly flexible cleft. It was also found that the dynamics involved in the opening/closing motions were due to the movement of different domains of the protein, which is in agreement with recent experimental data. Considering our results, a mechanism in which p53 might be recognized and attached to MDM2 is proposed, and some implications on future directions for in silico anticancer drug design efforts are discussed. In summary, the observations made here would be very useful not only for better understanding of the biological implications of the MDM2 dynamics, but also for future efforts in anticancer drug design and discovery.     

Computational studies and peptidomimetic design for the human p53-MDM2 complex

The interaction between human p53 and MDM2 is a key event in controlling cell growth. Many studies have suggested that a p53 mimic would be sufficient to inhibit MDM2 to reduce cell growth in cancerous tissue. In order to design a potent p53 mimic, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations were used to examine the binding interface and the effect of mutating key residues in the human p53-MDM2 complex. The Generalized Born surface area (GBSA) method was used to estimate free energies of binding, and a computational alanine-scanning approach was used to calculate the relative effects in the free energy of binding for key mutations. Our calculations determine the free energy of binding for a model p53-MDM2 complex to be -7.4 kcal/mol, which is in very good agreement with the experimentally determined values (-6.6--8.8 kcal/mol). The alanine-scanning results are in good agreement with experimental data and calculations by other groups. We have used the information from our studies of human p53-MDM2 to design a beta-peptide mimic of p53. MD simulations of the mimic bound to MDM2 estimate a free energy of binding of -8.8 kcal/mol. We have also applied alanine scanning to the mimic-MDM2 complex and reveal which mutations are most likely to alter the binding affinity, possibly giving rise to escape mutants. The mimic was compared to nutlins, a new class of inhibitors that block the formation of the p53-MDM2 complex. There are interesting similarities between the nutlins and our mimic, and the differences point to ways that both inhibitors may be improved. Finally, an additional hydrophobic pocket is noted in the interior of MDM2. It may be possible to design new inhibitors to take advantage of that pocket.     

Inhibition of MDM2 by hsp90 contributes to mutant p53 stabilization

Stabilization and overexpression are hallmarks of mutant p53 found in nearly 50% of human tumors. Mutations in the conformation-sensitive core domain of p53 often lead to association with molecular chaperones such as hsp70 and hsp90. Inhibition of hsp90 function accelerates mutant p53 degradation. We recently found that expression of p53 core domain mutants inhibits MDM2 degradation, suggesting that mutant p53 can modulate MDM2 functions. In this report, we show that mutant p53 mediates formation of MDM2-p53-hsp90 complexes. Release of MDM2 from the p53-hsp90 complex after DNA damage restores MDM2 but not p53 turnover, whereas dissociation of hsp90 by geldanamycin increases the degradation of both MDM2 and mutant p53. Mutant p53 degradation after hsp90 inhibition requires MDM2 expression. The interaction between MDM2 and hsp90 is disrupted by the 2A10 antibody, which recognizes a site on MDM2 important for binding to alternative reading frame (ARF). Expression of mutant p53 prevents MDM2 from binding ARF and accumulating in the nucleolus in an hsp90-dependent fashion. These results suggest that hsp90 recruited by mutant p53 conceals the ARF-binding site on MDM2 and inhibits its ubiquitin-protein isopeptide ligase function, resulting in the stabilization of both mutant p53 and MDM2.     

Targeting the conformational transitions of MDM2 and MDMX: Insights into key residues affecting p53 recognition

The oncogenic proteins MDM2 and MDMX have distinct and critical roles in the control of the activity of the p53 tumor suppressor protein. Recently, we have used spatial coarse graining simulations to analyze the conformational transitions manifest in the p53 recognition of MDM2 and MDMX. These conformational movements are different between MDM2 and MDMX and unveil the presence of conserved and nonconserved interactions in the p53 binding cleft that may be exploited in the design of selective and dual modulators of the oncogenic proteins. In this study, we investigate the conformational profiles of apo‐ and p53‐bound states of MDM2 and MDMX using molecular dynamic simulations along a time scale of 60 ns. The analysis of the trajectories is instrumental to discuss energetical and conformational aspects of p53 recognition and to point out specific key residues whose conformational shifts have crucial roles in affecting the apo‐ and p53‐bound states of MDM2 and MDMX. Among these, in particular, linear discriminant analyses identify diverse conformations of Y99/Y100 (MDMX/MDM2) as markers of the apo‐ and p53‐bound states of the oncogenic proteins. The results of this study shed further light on different p53 recognition in MDM2 and MDMX and may prove useful for the design and identification of new potent and selective synthetic modulators of p53‐MDM2/MDMX interactions. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Chemical states of the N-terminal “lid” of MDM2 regulate p53 binding: Simulations reveal complexities of modulation

Phosphorylation of S17 in the N-terminal "lid" of MDM2 (residues 1-24) is proposed to regulate the binding of p53. The lid is composed of an intrinsically disordered peptide motif that is not resolved in the crystal structure of the MDM2 N-terminal domain. Molecular dynamics simulations of MDM2 provide novel insight into how the lid undergoes complex dynamics depending on its phosphorylation state that have not been revealed by NMR analyses. The difference in charges between the phosphate and the phosphomimetic 'Asp' and the change in shape from tetrahedral to planar are manifested in differences in strengths and durations of interactions that appear to modulate access of the binding site to ligands and peptides differentially. These findings unveil the complexities that underlie protein-protein interactions and reconcile some differences between the biochemical and NMR data suggesting that lid mutation or deletion can change the specific activity of MDM2 and provide concepts for future approaches to evaluate the effects of S17 modification on p53 binding.     

Computational analysis of spiro-oxindole inhibitors of the MDM2-p53 interaction: insights and selection of novel inhibitors

Since MDM2 is an inhibitor of the p53 tumor suppressor, disrupting the MDM2-p53 interaction is a promising approach for cancer therapy. Here, we used molecular dynamics simulations followed by free energy decomposition analysis to study conformational changes in MDM2 induced by three known spiro-oxindole inhibitors. Analysis of individual energy terms suggests that van der Waals and electrostatic interactions explain much of the binding affinities of these inhibitors. Binding free energies calculated for the three inhibitors using the molecular mechanics-generalized Born surface area model were consistent with experimental data, suggesting the validity of this approach. Based on this structure-function analysis, several novel spiro-oxindole derivatives were selected and evaluated for their ability to block the MDM2-p53 interaction in vitro. These results suggest that combining in silico and experimental techniques can provide insights into the structure-function relationships of MDM2 inhibitors and guide the rational design of anticancer drugs targeting the MDM2-p53 interaction.     

Targeting of p53 and its homolog p73 by protoporphyrin IX

The p53 tumor suppressor is recognized as a promising target for anti-cancer therapies. We previously reported that protoporphyrin IX (PpIX) disrupts the p53/murine double minute 2 (MDM2) complex and leads to p53 accumulation and activation of apoptosis in HCT 116 cells. Here we show the direct binding of PpIX to the N-terminal domain of p53. Furthermore, we addressed the induction of apoptosis in HCT 116 p53-null cells by PpIX and revealed interactions between PpIX and p73. We propose that PpIX disrupts the p53/MDM2 or MDMX and p73/MDM2 complexes and thereby activates the p53- or p73-dependent cancer cell death.     

Modeling the interaction between the N‐terminal domain of the tumor suppressor p53 and azurin

It is known that the half life of the tumor suppressor p53 can be increased by the interaction with the bacterial protein azurin, resulting in an enhanced anti‐tumoral activity. The understanding of the molecular mechanisms on the basis of this phenomenon can open the way to new anti‐cancer strategies. Some experimental works have given evidence of an interaction between p53 and azurin (AZ); however the binding regions of the proteins are still unknown. Recently, fluorescence studies have shown that p53 partakes in the binding with the bacterial protein by its N‐terminal (NT) domain. Here we have used a computational method to get insight into this interacting mode. The model that we propose for the best complex between AZ and p53 has been obtained from a rigid‐body docking, coupled with a molecular dynamics (MD) simulation, a free energy calculation, and validated by mutagenesis analysis. We have found a high degree of geometric fit between the two proteins that are kept together by several hydrophobic interactions and numerous hydrogen bonds. Interestingly, it has emerged that AZ binds essentially to the helices H_I and H_III of the p53 NT domain, which are also interacting regions for the foremost inhibitor of p53, MDM2. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.     

Glycogen synthase kinase 3β inhibitors protect hippocampal neurons from radiation-induced apoptosis by regulating MDM2-p53 pathway

Exposure of the brain to ionizing radiation can cause neurocognitive deficiencies. The pathophysiology of these neurological changes is complex and includes radiation-induced apoptosis in the subgranular zone of the hippocampus. We have recently found that inhibition of glycogen synthase kinase 3β (GSK-3β) resulted in significant protection from radiation-induced apoptosis in hippocampal neurons. The molecular mechanisms of this cytoprotection include abrogation of radiation-induced accumulation of p53. Here we show that pretreatment of irradiated HT-22 hippocampal-derived neurons with small molecule inhibitors of GSK-3β SB216763 or SB415286, or with GSK-3β-specific shRNA resulted in accumulation of the p53-specific E3 ubiquitin ligase MDM2. Knockdown of MDM2 using specific shRNA or chemical inhibition of MDM2-p53 interaction prevented the protective changes triggered by GSK-3β inhibition in irradiated HT-22 neurons and restored radiation cytotoxicity. We found that this could be due to regulation of apoptosis by subcellular localization and interaction of GSK-3β, p53 and MDM2. These data suggest that the mechanisms of radioprotection by GSK-3β inhibitors in hippocampal neurons involve regulation of MDM2-dependent p53 accumulation and interactions between GSK-3β, MDM2 and p53.     

MDM2 and promyelocytic leukemia antagonize each other through their direct interaction with p53

p53 can be regulated through post-translational modifications and through interactions with positive and negative regulatory factors. MDM2 binding inhibits p53 and promotes its degradation by the proteasome, whereas promyelocytic leukemia (PML) activates p53 by recruiting it to multiprotein complexes termed PML-nuclear bodies. We reported previously an in vivo and in vitro interaction between PML and MDM2 that is independent of p53. In the current study, we investigated whether interaction between MDM2 and PML can indirectly affect p53 activity. Increasing amounts of MDM2 inhibited p53 activation by PML but could not inhibit PML-mediated activation of a p53 fusion protein that lacked the MDM2-binding domain. Conversely, increasing amounts of PML could overcome p53 inhibition by MDM2 but could not overcome MDM2-mediated inhibition of a p53 fusion protein that lacked the PML-binding domain. These results demonstrate that MDM2 and PML can antagonize each other through their direct interaction with p53 and suggest the combined effects of MDM2 and PML on p53 function are determined by the relative level of each protein. Furthermore, these results imply that interactions between MDM2 and PML by themselves have little or no effect on p53 activity.     

MDM2 protein-mediated ubiquitination of numb protein: identification of a second physiological substrate of MDM2 that employs a dual-site docking mechanism

The E3 ubiquitin ligase, MDM2, uses a dual-site mechanism to ubiquitinate and degrade the tumor suppressor protein p53, involving interactions with the N-terminal hydrophobic pocket and the acidic domain of MDM2. The results presented here demonstrate that MDM2 also uses this same dual-site mechanism to bind to the cell fate determinant NUMB with both the N-terminal hydrophobic pocket and the acidic domain of MDM2 also involved in forming the interaction with NUMB. Furthermore, the acidic domain interactions are crucial for MDM2-mediated ubiquitination of NUMB. Contrary to p53, where two separate domains form the interface with MDM2, only one region within the phosphotyrosine binding domain of NUMB (amino acids 113-148) mediates binding to both these regions of MDM2. By binding to both domains on MDM2, NUMB disrupts the MDM2-p53 complex and MDM2-catalyzed ubiquitination of p53. Therefore, we have identified the mechanism NUMB uses to regulate the steady-state levels of the p53 in cells. By targeting the acidic domain of MDM2 using acid domain-binding ligands we can overcome MDM2-mediated ubiquitination and degradation of NUMB impacting on the stabilization of p53 in cells. Furthermore, delivery of MDM2 acid domain-binding ligands to cancer cells promotes p53-dependent growth arrest and the induction of apoptosis. This highlights the dual-site mechanism of MDM2 on another physiological substrate and identifies the acid domain as well as N terminus as a potential target for small molecules that inhibit MDM2.     

Structure of the MDM2/MDMX RING domain heterodimer reveals dimerization is required for their ubiquitylation in trans

MDM2, a ubiquitin E3-ligase of the RING family, has a key role in regulating p53 abundance. During normal non-stress conditions p53 is targeted for degradation by MDM2. MDM2 can also target itself and MDMX for degradation. MDMX is closely related to MDM2 but the RING domain of MDMX does not possess intrinsic E3-ligase activity. Instead, MDMX regulates p53 abundance by modulating the levels and activity of MDM2. Dimerization, mediated by the conserved C-terminal RING domains of both MDM2 and MDMX, is critical to this activity. Here we report the crystal structure of the MDM2/MDMX RING domain heterodimer and map residues required for functional interaction with the E2 (UbcH5b). In both MDM2 and MDMX residues C-terminal to the RING domain have a key role in dimer formation. In addition we show that these residues are part of an extended surface that is essential for ubiquitylation in trans. This study provides a molecular basis for understanding how heterodimer formation leads to stabilization of MDM2, yet degradation of p53, and suggests novel targets for therapeutic intervention.     

Targeting of p53 peptide analogues to anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins as revealed by NMR spectroscopy

Inhibition of the interaction between the p53 tumor suppressor and its negative regulator MDM2 is of great importance to cancer therapy. The anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins are also attractive anti-cancer molecular targets, as they are key regulators of apoptotic cell death. Previously, we reported the interactions between the p53 transactivation domain (p53TAD) and diverse members of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins. In this study, we investigated the binding of MDM2-inhibiting p53TAD peptide analogues, p53-MDM2/MDMX inhibitor (PMI) and pDI, with anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins, Bcl-X_L and Bcl-2, by using NMR spectroscopy. The NMR chemical shift perturbation data demonstrated the direct binding of the p53 peptide analogues to Bcl-X_L and Bcl-2 and showed that the PMI and pDI peptides bind to a conserved hydrophobic groove of the anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins. Furthermore, the structural model of the Bcl-X_L/PMI peptide complex showed that the binding mode of the PMI peptide is highly similar to that of pro-apoptotic Bcl-2 homology 3 (BH3) peptides. Finally, our structural comparison provided a molecular basis for how the same PMI peptide can bind to two distinct anti-cancer target proteins Bcl-X_L and MDM2, which may have potential applications for multi-targeting cancer therapy.     

Why is F19Ap53 unable to bind MDM2? Simulations suggest crack propagation modulates binding

Why doesn’t the F19A mutant of p53 bind to MDM2? Binding thermodynamics have suggested that the loss of packing interactions upon mutating Phe into Ala sidechain results in destabilizing the binding free energy between p53 and MDM2. Does this mutation also modulate the initial recognition between p53 and MDM2? We look at atomistic computer simulations of the process of the initial encounter between wild type p53 peptide and its F19A mutant with the N-terminal domain of MDM2. These simulations show that binding is characterized by a complex multistep process. It starts with the capture of F19 of wild type p53 by certain residues in the MDM2 binding pocket. This initial step anchors the peptide onto the surface of MDM2, and with the consequent reduction in the search space of the peptide, the peptide docks into the partially occluded surface of MDM2. This is similar to a crack forming in an otherwise occluded hydrophobic cavity in MDM2, and the peptide, docked through F19, modulates the propagation of this crack, which subsequently results in the stepwise docking of the rest of the peptide through insertions of W23 and L26. The lack of the bulky sidechain of F in the F19A mutant results in the absence of the initial “grasp” complex, and hence the mutant peptide diffuses randomly on the surface of MDM2 without binding. This is the first such demonstration of the possibility that a “kinetic” effect may partly underlie the destabilized thermodynamics of binding of F19A and is a feature that appears to be conserved in evolution. The observations by Wallace et al. (Mol Cell 2006; 23:251–63) that despite the inability of F19A to bind at the N-terminal domain of MDM2, it gets ubiquitinated, can now be partly understood based on a mechanism whereby the occupation of the binding pocket by ligands/peptides induces, via crack propagation and the dynamics of gatekeeper Y100, the ubiquitination signal for interactions between the acidic domain of MDM2 and the DNA binding domain of p53.