Pancreatic Cancer Genetics

Although relatively rare, pancreatic tumors are highly lethal [1]. In the United States, an estimated 48,960 individuals will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and 40,560 will die from this disease in 2015 [1]. Globally, 337,872 new pancreatic cancer cases and 330,391 deaths were estimated in 2012 [2]. In contrast to most other cancers, mortality rates for pancreatic cancer are not improving; in the US, it is predicted to become the second leading cause of cancer related deaths by 2030 [3, 4]. The vast majority of tumors arise in the exocrine pancreas, with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) accounting for approximately 95% of tumors. Tumors arising in the endocrine pancreas (pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors) represent less than 5% of all pancreatic tumors [5]. Smoking, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D), obesity and pancreatitis are the most consistent epidemiological risk factors for pancreatic cancer [5]. Family history is also a risk factor for developing pancreatic cancer with odds ratios (OR) ranging from 1.7-2.3 for first-degree relatives in most studies, indicating that shared genetic factors may play a role in the etiology of this disease [6-9]. This review summarizes the current knowledge of germline pancreatic cancer risk variants with a special emphasis on common susceptibility alleles identified through Genome Wide Association Studies (GWAS).     

Predominant Ashkenazi BRCA1/2 mutations in families with pancreatic cancer

The present study aimed to identify pancreatic cancer patients who harbor a mutation in BRCA1/2 genes within hereditary breast-ovarian cancer families. History of cancer in 1014 families that attended our breast-ovarian oncogenetic clinic was evaluated. Twenty-three families with pancreatic cancer were studied. In nine families wherein the probands themselves presented with pancreatic cancer, two (22%) carried a BRCA mutation (185delAG in BRCA1 in one case and 6174delT in BRCA2 in the other). In 14 families, only a family history of pancreatic cancer was elicited. Of these, seven families segregated either the 185delAG (three families) or the 6174delT (three families) mutation; one family segregated both mutations, but the parental status was not studied. Pedigree analysis shows that four of the seven pancreatic cancer cases were obligatory carriers. In summary, from among 23 families with pancreatic cancer, 6 (26%) informative BRCA1/2 mutation carriers were identified, equally cosegregating the 185delAG or the 6174delT mutation. Yet, it is not fully elucidated whether the risk for pancreatic cancer attributed to BRCA1 is similar to the high risk conferred by BRCA2. In Ashkenazi Jews, mutations in BRCA1/2 may constitute a major cause for pancreatic cancer.     

Average age-specific cumulative risk of breast cancer according to type and site of germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 estimated from multiple-case breast cancer families attending Australian family cancer clinics

If the risk of disease is not the same for all germline mutations in a given gene, or if there are other familial modifiers of risk in carriers, then family-history-based estimates of average risk for detected mutations in that gene will depend on how carriers are sampled. Risk may also depend on the site or type of mutation. We studied 51 families with strong histories of breast cancer who attended Australian family cancer clinics and in which a germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2 had been identified (28 and 23 families, respectively). Breast cancer risk in carriers was estimated under maximum likelihood theory, using information from all family members including those not tested, with adjustment for ascertainment by conditioning on genotype of the proband and family phenotype. The average cumulative risk of breast cancer for mutations in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 was 27% (95% confidence interval 16-43%) to age 50 and 64% (44-83%) to age 70. When grouped, the incidence in carriers was on average 17 (10-30) times that in non-carriers, independent of gene or mutation type (hazard ratios: 11 (4-29) for BRCA1, 23 (12-43) for BRCA2 (P for difference = 0.23); 13 (6-29) for protein-truncating mutations, 30 (9-104) for missense mutations and 30 (10-90) for splice-site mutations). For missense mutations, this was equivalent to a cumulative risk to age 70 of 83% (40-100%) and was due in part, but not totally, to the missense mutations 300 T>G in BRCA1 and 4486 G>T in BRCA2, which were individually found to be associated with high risk (P<0.001). Mutations in the central region of BRCA1 may be associated with a lower risk. The issue of the pathogenicity of specific variants may be addressed analytically providing there are one or more suitably informative families with that mutation.     

Familial pancreatic cancer

Familial clustering is estimated in 5-10% of pancreatic cancers. In different countries Familial Pancreatic Cancer Registries have been established to investigate the epidemiology, and genetic background in these families and, to organize the screening programs for high-risk relatives and for follow-up. The largest such registry is found at Johns Hopkins University Hospital. Evaluating the available data revealed that familial pancreatic cancer is heterogeneous: it may occur in kindreds of pancreatic cancer patients, but it may also be associated with various familial cancer syndromes. Such syndromes include FAMMM-syndrome, hereditary breast cancer, Peutz-Jeghers syndrome, but other associations can also be taken into account. The germline mutations are also heterogeneous, and although they are not absolutely decisive, they significantly increase the risk of the affected persons, making the organ more susceptible for environmental carcinogens. High-risk family members should be screened for gene mutations (especially for BRCA2, STK11/LKB1, CDKN2A/p16, PRSS1 genes), and by using endoscopic ultrasound. These methods are useful for identifying the preneoplastic conditions, but of equal importance is the cessation of smoking. In Hungary there are no relevant data about the epidemiology of familial pancreatic cancer, but their number is estimated to be about 80-150 annually. Considering the very high (and continuously increasing) incidence, it seems to be necessary to register and screen these families. This review emphasizes the importance of these goals.     

Is mammography indicated for women with defective BRCA genes? Implications of recent scientific advances for the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of hereditary breast cancer

About 5% of breast cancer patients have inherited their disease because of a mutation in genes encoding either the BRCA-1 or BRCA-2 proteins. Inheriting one of these mutations confers a 50% to 87% risk of breast cancer. Many physicians faced with such a patient would, at a minimum, suggest increased and earlier screening for breast cancer by routine mammography.[1] Normally, regular mammographic screening combined with appropriate and prompt treatment can reduce mortality from breast cancer by 30% in women aged 50-59 years and by about 14%-18% in women aged 40-49. There are no controlled clinical trials for screening young women who have multiple first-degree relatives developing breast cancer before age 45, or those known to carry BRCA-1 or BRCA-2 mutations. In fact, recent advances point out that BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 gene products are needed to repair radiation damage to DNA.[4,5] Based on this finding, I propose that women with defective BRCA genes are likely to have an inordinate sensitivity to radiation, and this raises a question about the advisability of routinely screening these women by frequent mammography.     

Prevalence and penetrance of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population series of 649 women with ovarian cancer

A population-based series of 649 unselected incident cases of ovarian cancer diagnosed in Ontario, Canada, during 1995-96 was screened for germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2. We specifically tested for 11 of the most commonly reported mutations in the two genes. Then, cases were assessed with the protein-truncation test (PTT) for exon 11 of BRCA1, with denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis for the remainder of BRCA1, and with PTT for exons 10 and 11 of BRCA2. No mutations were found in all 134 women with tumors of borderline histology. Among the 515 women with invasive cancers, we identified 60 mutations, 39 in BRCA1 and 21 in BRCA2. The total mutation frequency among women with invasive cancers, 11.7% (95% confidence interval [95%CI] 9.2%-14.8%), is higher than previous estimates. Hereditary ovarian cancers diagnosed at age <50 years were mostly (83%) due to BRCA1, whereas the majority (60%) of those diagnosed at age >60 years were due to BRCA2. Mutations were found in 19% of women reporting first-degree relatives with breast or ovarian cancer and in 6.5% of women with no affected first-degree relatives. Risks of ovarian, breast, and stomach cancers and leukemias/lymphomas were increased nine-, five-, six- and threefold, respectively, among first-degree relatives of cases carrying BRCA1 mutations, compared with relatives of noncarriers, and risk of colorectal cancer was increased threefold for relatives of cases carrying BRCA2 mutations. For carriers of BRCA1 mutations, the estimated penetrance by age 80 years was 36% for ovarian cancer and 68% for breast cancer. In breast-cancer risk for first-degree relatives, there was a strong trend according to mutation location along the coding sequence of BRCA1, with little evidence of increased risk for mutations in the 5' fifth, but 8.8-fold increased risk for mutations in the 3' fifth (95%CI 3.6-22.0), corresponding to a carrier penetrance of essentially 100%. Ovarian, colorectal, stomach, pancreatic, and prostate cancer occurred among first-degree relatives of carriers of BRCA2 mutations only when mutations were in the ovarian cancer-cluster region (OCCR) of exon 11, whereas an excess of breast cancer was seen when mutations were outside the OCCR. For cancers of all sites combined, the estimated penetrance of BRCA2 mutations was greater for males than for females, 53% versus 38%. Past studies may have underestimated the contribution of BRCA2 to ovarian cancer, because mutations in this gene cause predominantly late-onset cancer, and previous work has focused more on early-onset disease. If confirmed in future studies, the trend in breast-cancer penetrance, according to mutation location along the BRCA1 coding sequence, may have significant impact on treatment decisions for carriers of BRCA1-mutations. As well, BRCA2 mutations may prove to be a greater cause of cancer in male carriers than previously has been thought.     

Frequency and carrier risk associated with common BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish breast cancer patients.

Based on breast cancer families with multiple and/or early-onset cases, estimates of the lifetime risk of breast cancer in carriers of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations may be as high as 85%. The risk for individuals not selected for family history or other risk factors is uncertain. We determined the frequency of the common BRCA1 (185delAG and 5382insC) and BRCA2 (6174delT) mutations in a series of 268 anonymous Ashkenazi Jewish women with breast cancer, regardless of family history or age at onset. DNA was analyzed for the three mutations by allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization. Eight patients (3.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5%-5.8%) were heterozygous for the 185delAG mutation, two (0.75%, 95% CI 0.20-2.7) for the 5382insC mutation, and eight (3.0%, 95% CI 1.5-5.8) for the 6174delT mutation. The lifetime risk for breast cancer in Ashkenazi Jewish carriers of the BRCA1 185delAG or BRCA2 6174delT mutations was calculated to be 36%, approximately three times the overall risk for the general population (relative risk 2.9, 95% CI 1.5-5.8). For the 5382insC mutation, because of the low number of carriers found, further studies are necessary. The results differ markedly from previous estimates based on high-risk breast cancer families and are consistent with lower estimates derived from a recent population-based study in the Baltimore area. Thus, presymptomatic screening and counseling for these common mutations in Ashkenazi Jewish women not selected for family history of breast cancer should be reconsidered until the risk associated with these mutations is firmly established, especially since early diagnostic and preventive-treatment modalities are limited.     

Analysis of PALB2 Gene in BRCA1/BRCA2 Negative Spanish Hereditary Breast/Ovarian Cancer Families with Pancreatic Cancer Cases

Background

The PALB2 gene, also known as FANCN, forms a bond and co-localizes with BRCA2 in DNA repair. Germline mutations in PALB2 have been identified in approximately 1% of familial breast cancer and 3–4% of familial pancreatic cancer. The goal of this study was to determine the prevalence of PALB2 mutations in a population of BRCA1/BRCA2 negative breast cancer patients selected from either a personal or family history of pancreatic cancer.

Methods

132 non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast/ovarian cancer families with at least one pancreatic cancer case were included in the study. PALB2 mutational analysis was performed by direct sequencing of all coding exons and intron/exon boundaries, as well as multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification.

Results

Two PALB2 truncating mutations, the c.1653T>A (p.Tyr551Stop) previously reported, and c.3362del (p.Gly1121ValfsX3) which is a novel frameshift mutation, were identified. Moreover, several PALB2 variants were detected; some of them were predicted as pathological by bioinformatic analysis. Considering truncating mutations, the prevalence rate of our population of BRCA1/2-negative breast cancer patients with pancreatic cancer is 1.5%.

Conclusions

The prevalence rate of PALB2 mutations in non-BRCA1/BRCA2 breast/ovarian cancer families, selected from either a personal or family pancreatic cancer history, is similar to that previously described for unselected breast/ovarian cancer families. Future research directed towards identifying other gene(s) involved in the development of breast/pancreatic cancer families is required.     

Contribution of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations to breast and ovarian cancer in Pakistan

The population of Pakistan has been reported to have the highest rate of breast cancer of any Asian population (excluding Jews in Israel) and one of the highest rates of ovarian cancer worldwide. To explore the contribution that genetic factors make to these high rates, we have conducted a case-control study of 341 case subjects with breast cancer, 120 case subjects with ovarian cancer, and 200 female control subjects from two major cities of Pakistan (Karachi and Lahore). The prevalence of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations among case subjects with breast cancer was 6.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.1%-9.4%), and that among case subjects with ovarian cancer was 15.8% (95% CI 9.2%-22.4%). Mutations of the BRCA1 gene accounted for 84% of the mutations among case subjects with ovarian cancer and 65% of mutations among case subjects with breast cancer. The majority of detected mutations are unique to Pakistan. Five BRCA1 mutations (2080insA, 3889delAG, 4184del4, 4284delAG, and IVS14-1A-->G) and one BRCA2 mutation (3337C-->T) were found in multiple case subjects and represent candidate founder mutations. The penetrance of deleterious mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 is comparable to that of Western populations. The cumulative risk of cancer to age 85 years in female first-degree relatives of BRCA1-mutation-positive case subjects was 48% and was 37% for first-degree relatives of the BRCA2-mutation-positive case subjects. A higher proportion of case subjects with breast cancer than of control subjects were the progeny of first-cousin marriages (odds ratio [OR] 2.1; 95% CI 1.4-3.3; P=.001). The effects of consanguinity were significant for case subjects with early-onset breast cancer (age <40 years) (OR=2.7; 95% CI 1.5-4.9; P=.0008) and case subjects with ovarian cancer (OR=2.4; 95% CI 1.4-4.2; P=.002). These results suggest that recessively inherited genes may contribute to breast and ovarian cancer risk in Pakistan.     

Somatic inactivation of the VHL gene in Von Hippel-Lindau disease tumors.

Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a dominantly inherited disorder predisposing to retinal and CNS hemangioblastomas, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), pheochromocytoma, and pancreatic tumors. Interfamilial differences in predisposition to pheochromocytoma reflect allelic heterogeneity such that there is a strong association between missense mutations and risk of pheochromocytoma. We investigated the mechanism of tumorigenesis in VHL disease tumors to determine whether there were differences between tumor types or classes of germ-line mutations. Fifty-three tumors (30 RCCs, 15 hemangioblastomas, 5 pheochromocytomas, and 3 pancreatic tumors) from 33 patients (27 kindreds) with VHL disease were analyzed. Overall, 51% of 45 informative tumors showed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) at the VHL locus. In 11 cases it was possible to distinguish between loss of the wild-type and mutant alleles, and in each case the wild-type allele was lost. LOH was detected in all tumor types and occurred in the presence of both germ-line missense mutations and other types of germline mutation associated with a low risk of pheochromocytoma. Intragenic somatic mutations were detected in three tumors (all hemangioblastomas) and in two of these could be shown to occur in the wild-type allele. This provides the first example of homozygous inactivation of the VHL by small intragenic mutations in this type of tumor. Hypermethylation of the VHL gene was detected in 33% (6/18) of tumors without LOH, including 2 RCCs and 4 hemangioblastomas. Although hypermethylation of the VHL gene has been reported previously in nonfamilial RCC and although methylation of tumor-suppressor genes has been implicated in the pathogenesis of other sporadic cancers, this is the first report of somatic methylation in a familial cancer syndrome.     

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation analysis of 208 Ashkenazi Jewish women with ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer is a component of the autosomal-dominant hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome and may be due to a mutation in either the BRCA1 or BRCA2 genes. Two mutations in BRCA1 (185delAG and 5382insC) and one mutation in BRCA2 (6174delT) are common in the Ashkenazi Jewish population. One of these three mutations is present in approximately 2% of the Jewish population. Each mutation is associated with an increased risk of ovarian cancer, and it is expected that a significant proportion of Jewish women with ovarian cancer will carry one of these mutations. To estimate the proportion of ovarian cancers attributable to founding mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 in the Jewish population and the familial cancer risks associated with each, we interviewed 213 Jewish women with ovarian cancer at 11 medical centers in North America and Israel and offered these women genetic testing for the three founder mutations. To establish the presence of nonfounder mutations in this population, we also completed the protein-truncation test on exon 11 of BRCA1 and exons 10 and 11 of BRCA2. We obtained a detailed family history on all women we studied who had cancer and on a control population of 386 Ashkenazi Jewish women without ovarian or breast cancer. A founder mutation was present in 41.3% of the women we studied. The cumulative incidence of ovarian cancer to age 75 years was found to be 6.3% for female first-degree relatives of the patients with ovarian cancer, compared with 2.0% for the female relatives of healthy controls (relative risk 3.2; 95% CI 1.5-6.8; P=.002). The relative risk to age 75 years for breast cancer among the female first-degree relatives was 2.0 (95% CI 1.4-3.0; P=.0001). Only one nonfounder mutation was identified (in this instance, in a woman of mixed ancestry), and the three founding mutations accounted for most of the observed excess risk of ovarian and breast cancer in relatives.     

Variation in cancer risks, by mutation position, in BRCA2 mutation carriers

Cancer occurrence in 164 families with breast/ovarian cancer and germline BRCA2 mutations was studied to evaluate the evidence for genotype-phenotype correlations. Mutations in a central portion of the gene (the "ovarian cancer cluster region" [OCCR]) were associated with a significantly higher ratio of cases of ovarian:breast cancer in female carriers than were mutations 5' or 3' of this region (P<.0001), extending previous observations. The optimal definition of the OCCR, as judged on the basis of deviance statistics, was bounded by nucleotides 3059-4075 and 6503-6629. The relative and absolute risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with OCCR and non-OCCR mutations were estimated by a conditional likelihood approach, conditioning on the set of mutations observed in the families. OCCR mutations were associated both with a highly significantly lower risk of breast cancer (relative risk [RR] 0.63; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.46-0.84; P=.0012) and with a significantly higher risk of ovarian cancer (RR = 1.88; 95% CI = 1.08-3.33; P=.026). No other differences in breast or ovarian cancer risk, by mutation position, were apparent. There was some evidence for a lower risk of prostate cancer in carriers of an OCCR mutation (RR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.24-1.00; P=.05), but there was no evidence of a difference in breast cancer risk in males. By age 80 years, the cumulative risk of breast cancer in male carriers of a BRCA2 mutation was estimated as 6.92% (95% CI = 1.20%-38.57%). Possible mechanisms for the variation in cancer risk are suggested by the coincidence of the OCCR with the RAD51-binding domain.     

Erbliches Pankreaskarzinom

The dismal prognosis for ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma is mainly attributable to advanced tumor stages at the time of diagnosis. Familial pancreatic cancer is an established hereditary tumor syndrome that is responsible for about 3% of pancreatic cancer cases. Therefore, analysis of family history may help to identify individuals at increased risk for the development of pancreatic cancer. In addition to family history, such high risk individuals can be identified by screening for mutations in tumor predisposition genes and/or analyses of exogenous risk factors. Invasive screening methods for the identification of early pancreatic cancer could also be applied to provide the option of a timely curative pancreatectomy. The benefit of a clinical, genetically based screening approach for individuals at high riskis currently being investigated in prospective studies.     

Comparison of New Glucose-Lowering Drugs on the Risk of Pancreatitis in Type 2 Diabetes: A Network Meta-Analysis

ObjectiveTo explore whether new glucose-lowering drugs increase the risk of pancreatitis in individuals with type 2 diabetes. This present network meta-analysis aimed to investigate the risk of pancreatitis associated with the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.MethodsPubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched. The literature was published from the date of their inception to July 21, 2021, including placebo-controlled or head-to-head trials of 2 new glucose-lowering drugs. The relative ratio (RR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to assess the risk of GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors for pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer among patients with type 2 diabetes.ResultsSeventeen studies were identified, covered 102 257 participants. The pooled results showed a neutral relationship between GLP-1 agonists and pancreatitis (overall RR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.31-3.00) or pancreatic cancer (overall RR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.31-4.10) compared with placebo. Meanwhile, DPP-4 inhibitors were not associated with the increased risk of pancreatitis (overall RR, 1.60; 95% CI, 0.25-11.00) or pancreatic cancer (overall RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.26-2.40). Among them, lixisenatide and saxagliptin may be the safest drugs compared with other drugs according to the ranking of probability. Sensitivity and subgroup analysis confirmed the stability of the core results.ConclusionThe most obvious finding of this study is that GLP-1 agonists and DPP-4 inhibitors are safe with respect to the risk of pancreatitis and pancreatic cancer compared with placebo. This conclusion may provide useful evidence for correlated clinical researches.     

Common breast cancer-predisposition alleles are associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer high risks of breast cancer. However, evidence suggests that these risks are modified by other genetic or environmental factors that cluster in families. A recent genome-wide association study has shown that common alleles at single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in FGFR2 (rs2981582), TNRC9 (rs3803662), and MAP3K1 (rs889312) are associated with increased breast cancer risks in the general population. To investigate whether these loci are also associated with breast cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers, we genotyped these SNPs in a sample of 10,358 mutation carriers from 23 studies. The minor alleles of SNP rs2981582 and rs889312 were each associated with increased breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele hazard ratio [HR] = 1.32, 95% CI: 1.20-1.45, p(trend) = 1.7 x 10(-8) and HR = 1.12, 95% CI: 1.02-1.24, p(trend) = 0.02) but not in BRCA1 carriers. rs3803662 was associated with increased breast cancer risk in both BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers (per-allele HR = 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, p(trend) = 5 x 10(-5) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 combined). These loci appear to interact multiplicatively on breast cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers. The differences in the effects of the FGFR2 and MAP3K1 SNPs between BRCA1 and BRCA2 carriers point to differences in the biology of BRCA1 and BRCA2 breast cancer tumors and confirm the distinct nature of breast cancer in BRCA1 mutation carriers.     

The association between N-acetyltransferase 2 gene polymorphisms and pancreatic cancer

Pancreatic cancer has been linked with exposure to environmental chemicals, which generally require metabolic activation to highly reactive toxic or carcinogenic intermediates. N-acetyltransferase 1 (NAT1) and N-acetyltransferase 2 (NAT2) are expressed primarily in extrahepatic and hepatic tissues, respectively. Both enzymes catalyze N- and O-acetylation of aromatic and heterocyclic amines. It is believed that these compounds are activated via O-acetylation and detoxified by N-acetylation. Several polymorphisms of these two genes have been associated with an increased risk of cancer. Twenty-seven cases of pancreatic cancer and 104 controls were included in this study. Blood was collected in EDTA-containing tubes, and genomic DNA was extracted from the white blood cells by using a high pure PCR template preparation kit. Genotyping of NAT2 polymorphisms was detected by a real time PCR instrument. There was a significant difference in the distribution of the NAT2*6A acetylators phenotype between cases and the controls. The odds ratio of pancreatic cancer for the NAT2*6A slow phenotype was 5.7 (95% CI = 1.27-25.55; p = 0.023) compared with the fast type. Our results suggest that slow acetylators have higher risk of developing pancreatic cancer than fast acetylators. NAT2 gene polymorphisms may be associated with genetic susceptibility to pancreatic cancer.     

Lack of germ-line promoter methylation in BRCA1-negative families with familial breast cancer

Hereditary breast cancer accounts for about 10% of breast cancer in the United States, but high-penetrance, germ-line mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 are responsible for less than half of these high-risk families. Epigenetic modification of DNA by promoter methylation can result in a potentially heritable epimutation that silences the gene. Using a highly sensitive technique, we assayed the BRCA1 gene for promoter methylation among 41 BRCA1- and BRCA2-negative women whose personal and family histories indicated a high risk of BRCA mutations (median prior likelihood = 60%) using the BRCAPro model. DNA from 19 women who were "true negatives" for BRCA mutations served as controls. We found no evidence for promoter methylation among the high-risk women who tested negative for germ-line BRCA mutations. Thus, epimutation is an unlikely explanation for hereditary breast cancer in women who test negative for BRCA mutations.     

Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case Series unselected for family history: a combined analysis of 22 studies

Germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 confer high risks of breast and ovarian cancer, but the average magnitude of these risks is uncertain and may depend on the context. Estimates based on multiple-case families may be enriched for mutations of higher risk and/or other familial risk factors, whereas risk estimates from studies based on cases unselected for family history have been imprecise. We pooled pedigree data from 22 studies involving 8,139 index case patients unselected for family history with female (86%) or male (2%) breast cancer or epithelial ovarian cancer (12%), 500 of whom had been found to carry a germline mutation in BRCA1 or BRCA2. Breast and ovarian cancer incidence rates for mutation carriers were estimated using a modified segregation analysis, based on the occurrence of these cancers in the relatives of mutation-carrying index case patients. The average cumulative risks in BRCA1-mutation carriers by age 70 years were 65% (95% confidence interval 44%-78%) for breast cancer and 39% (18%-54%) for ovarian cancer. The corresponding estimates for BRCA2 were 45% (31%-56%) and 11% (2.4%-19%). Relative risks of breast cancer declined significantly with age for BRCA1-mutation carriers (P trend.0012) but not for BRCA2-mutation carriers. Risks in carriers were higher when based on index breast cancer cases diagnosed at <35 years of age. We found some evidence for a reduction in risk in women from earlier birth cohorts and for variation in risk by mutation position for both genes. The pattern of cancer risks was similar to those found in multiple-case families, but their absolute magnitudes were lower, particularly for BRCA2. The variation in risk by age at diagnosis of index case is consistent with the effects of other genes modifying cancer risk in carriers.