Radiation therapy with curative intention in men with de novo metastatic prostate carcinoma: shoot‘em all!

BackgroundAbout 5% of prostate cancer cases are metastatic at diagnoses. Radiotherapy of both primary tumor and secondary lesions can be, in addition to systemic treatments, a radical alternative for selected patients.Materials and methodsPatients with de novo prostate carcinoma with bone or lymph node metastases were retrospectively reviewed. All patients received moderate hypofractionated IMRT/VMAT up to 63 Gy in 21 daily fractions of 3 Gy to prostate and metastases with neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). According to known advances some patients also received abiraterone, enzalutamide, or docetaxel.ResultsBetween 2015–2020, we attended 26 prostate cancer patients (median age 69.5 years, range 52–84) with simultaneous oligometastases [mean 2.1 metastases, median 1.5 metastases (range 1–6)]. Eighteen patients (69%) presented lymph node metastases, 4 (15.5%) bone metastases and 4 (15.5%) both lymph node and bone metastases. With a median follow-up of 15.5 months (range 3–65 months), 16 patients (62%) are alive and tumor free while 10 (38%) are alive with tumor. Four patients (17%) developed tumor progression, out of irradiated area in all cases, with a median time to progression of 43.5 months (range 27–56 months). Actuarial progression-free survival (PFS) rates at 12 and 24 months were 94.1% and 84.7%, respectively. No grade > 2 acute or late complications were recorded.ConclusionsSimultaneous directed radical hypofractionated radiation therapy for prostate and metastases is feasible, well tolerated and achieves an acceptable PFS rate. However, further studies with longer follow-up are necessary to definitively address these observations.     

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of adrenal gland metastases in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease

BackgroundStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a form of noninvasive treatment that is becoming increasingly used to manage cancers with adrenal gland metastases. There is a paucity of data on safety and efficacy of this modality. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adrenal gland SBRT in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective study, we performed a single-institution analysis of 26 adrenal lesions from 23 patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease treated from 2013 to 2019 with the goal of achieving durable local control. Palliative cases were excluded. Radiation dosimetry data was collected. Kaplan Meier product estimator and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used for statistical analysis.ResultsThe median dose was 36 Gy in 3 fractions (range: 24–50 Gy and 3–6 fractions) with a median biologically effective dose (BED10) of 72 (range: 40–100). 1-year local control rate was 80% and median local control was not achieved due to a low number of failures. 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 66% and 32%. Toxicity was mild with only one case of grade 2 nausea and no grade 3–5 toxicity. Higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was associated with worse overall survival and a trend toward worse progression-free survival. In addition, worse performance status and lower BED10 were associated with worse survival. No such association could be shown for primary tumor location, histology, size or stage.ConclusionAdrenal SBRT for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease is a safe and effective form of treatment.     

Helical tomotherapy for asymptomatic chemotherapy-refractory or -unfit multiple (3 or more) metastases

BackgroundDespite chemotherapy innovations, prognosis of patients with chemotherapy-refractory or -unfit multiple metastases (CRMM/CUMM) remains poor. In this prospective study, the efficacy and toxicity of helical tomotherapy for CRMM/CUMM were evaluated.Materials and methodsBetween 2014 and 2020, asymptomatic patients with CRMM/CUMM with ≥ 3 lesions and no prior radiotherapy of the targets were enrolled. Patients who had intolerable toxicities to chemotherapy and those who refused chemotherapy were included in the CRMM and CUMM groups, respectively. Prostate cancer patients and patients with metastases mainly localized in the liver, lung, or brain were excluded. By helical tomotherapy, up to 10 lesions per patient were irradiated in order of volume. The standard dose was 50–60 Gy in 25–30 fractions.ResultsForty-five patients (median age, 63 years; 35 CRMM/10 CUMM) were enrolled. Primary tumors included lung, gynecological, and gastrointestinal cancers. The most frequently treated targets were lymph node metastases, followed by peritoneal/pleural disseminations and bone tumors. The 1-year survival rate was 51% (median, 12.5 months). In the 35 patients with CRMM, the median survival time was 12.5 months, and the median pre-radiation chemotherapy period was 8.8 months (p > 0.05). The 6-month target control rate was 78%. Acute adverse events (grade ≥ 2) occurred in 33 patients: hematologic toxicities in 23, dermatitis in 6, and others in 8. Late grade ≥ 2 toxicities occurred in 6 patients: pneumonitis in 4 and gastric hemorrhage in 2.ConclusionTomotherapy for CRMM/CUMM resulted in median survival times > 1 year. This treatment should be investigated further in larger prospective studies.     

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for oligometastatic prostate cancer

BackgroundThe present study assessed clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in oligometastatic prostate cancer patients.Materials and methodsBetween 2017 and 2020, 37 lesions (12 osseous and 25 nodal targets) detected with conventional and/or functional imaging, were treated in 29 patients (pts), in different clinical settings: de novo oligometastatic (2 pts), oligorecurrent castration-sensitive (19 pts), castration-resistant (6 pts) prostate cancers and oligoprogressive disease during systemic therapy (2 pts). SBRT was delivered with volumetric modulated arc therapy up to a total dose of 21 Gy given in 3 fractions for bone and 30 Gy in 5 fractions for nodal metastases. A total of 34% of pts received hormonal therapy. We evaluated biochemical control [prostate serum antigen (PSA) increase < 10%)], progression free-survival (PFS) (time from SBRT to biochemical progression), local control (LC) (time from SBRT to in-field radiologic progression), hormone/systemic therapy-free survival, acute and late toxicities.ResultsAt 3 months, biochemical response was observed in 20/29 pts (69%). At a median follow-up of 17 months (range 6–33), 8/20 (40%) of the 3-month responders remained free from progression. Two-year PFS and LC were 37% and 70%, respectively. In-field progression occurred in 3/37 (8%) lesions. Hormone/systemic therapy was delayed by an average of 11.6 months (range 3–28). No significant difference in PFS based on the type of lesion or concomitant endocrine therapy was observed and no toxicity > grade 2 was reported.ConclusionsSBRT for oligometastatic prostate cancer offers a good biochemical/local control and tangible delay of hormone/systemic therapy without major toxicities.     

Toxicity outcome in patients treated with modulated arc radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer

Aim

This study evaluates the acute toxicity outcome in patients treated with RapidArc for localized prostate cancer.

Background

Modern technologies allow the delivery of high doses to the prostate while lowering the dose to the neighbouring organs at risk. Whether this dosimetric advantage translates into clinical benefit is not well known.

Materials and methods

Between December 2009 and May 2012, 45 patients with primary prostate adenocarcinoma were treated using RapidArc. All patients received 1.8 Gy per fraction, the median dose to the prostate gland, seminal vesicles, pelvic lymph nodes and surgical bed was 80 Gy (range, 77.4–81 Gy), 50.4 Gy, 50.4 Gy and 77.4 Gy (range, 75.6–79.2 Gy), respectively.

Results

The time between the last session and the last treatment follow up was a median of 10 months (range, 3–24 months). The incidence of grade 3 acute gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicity was 2.2% and 15.5%, respectively. Grade 2 acute GI and GU toxicity occurred in 30% and 27% of patients, respectively. No grade 4 acute GI and GU toxicity were observed. Older patients (>median) or patients with V60 higher than 35% had significantly higher rates of grade ≥2 acute GI toxicity compared with the younger ones.

Conclusions

RapidArc in the treatment of localized prostate cancer is tolerated well with no Grade >3 GI and GU toxicities. Older patients or patients with higher V60 had significantly higher rates of grade ≥2 acute GI toxicity. Further research is necessary to assess definitive late toxicity and tumour control outcome.     

Feasibility and safety of definite volumetric modulated arc therapy with simultaneous integrated boost to the dominant intraprostatic lesion in patients with unfavorable intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer

BackgroundThe most common site of recurrence of prostate cancer after definite radiation therapy is the dominant intraprostatic lesion (DIL). This study aimed to investigate the feasibility and safety of definite volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the DIL in patients with unfavorable intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer.Materials and methodsIn this prospective uncontrolled clinical trial, patients were delivered VMAT at a dose of 87.75 Gy in 39 fractions or 70 Gy in 20 fractions to the DIL in combination with androgen deprivation therapy. Genitourinary (GU) and rectal toxicity, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and IPSS quality of life (IPSS-QOL) score were collected.ResultsForty-five patients with a median follow-up of 20 months were analyzed. The cumulative incidence of acute grade ≥ 2 GU and rectal toxicity was 33.1% and 9.5%, respectively. Regarding late toxicity, the cumulative incidence of grade ≥ 2 GU and rectal toxicity was 12.6% and 2.8%, respectively. During treatment, the mean increase of IPSS was +7.4 ± 4.2 and the mean increase of IPSS-QOL was +1.7 ± 1.3. However, both IPSS and IPSS-QOL scores returned to their baseline levels by 3-months post-treatment. No significant correlation between baseline characteristics and grade ≥ 2 GU or rectal toxicity was found.ConclusionFocal SIB to the DIL of ≥ 90 Gy EQD2 in unfavorable intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer patients resulted in tolerable toxicity profiles. The mean IPSS and IPSS-QOL scores both worsened during treatment; however, both scores returned to baseline level by 3 months after treatment.     

Tomotherapy-based moderate hypofractionation for localized prostate cancer: a mono-institutional analysis

BackgroundTo date, few studies have been published on image-guided helical tomotherapy (HT) in a moderate hypofractionation of localized PCa. We report outcome and toxicity of localized PCa patients treated with HT-based moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy.Materials and methods76 patients were retrospectively analyzed. A total dose of 60 Gy (20 × 3 Gy) or 67.5 Gy (25 × 2.7 Gy) was prescribed. The χ² test was used to analyze associations between toxicity and dosimetric and clinical parameters. The Cox proportional hazard regression model was used for multivariate analysis. Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis.Resultsmedian follow-up was 42.26 months [interquartile (IQR), 23–76). At 4-year, overall survival (OS) and metastasis-free survival (MFS) were 91% and 89%, respectively. At multivariate analysis, smoking habitude was associated with MFS [hazard ratio (HR) 7.32, 95% CI: 1.57–34.16, p = 0.011]. Acute and late grade ≥ 2 gastro-intestinal (GI) toxicity was observed in 6.5% and 2.6% of patients, respectively. Acute and late grade ≥ 2 genito-urinary (GU) toxicity were 31.5% and 3.9%. Four-year late GI and GU grade ≥ 2 toxicity were 3% and 7%, respectively. Acute GI toxicity was associated with statins medication (p = 0.04) and androgen deprivation therapy (p = 0.013). Acute GU toxicity was associated with the use of anticoagulants (p = 0.029) and antiaggregants (p = 0.013).ConclusionsHT-based moderate hypofractionation shows very low rates of toxicity. Smoking habitude is associated with the risk of developing metastases after radical treatment for localized PCa.     

Adjuvant I-131 therapy for T0–3 N1b M0 differentiated thyroid cancer with many (≥ 5) positive nodes

BackgroundIn patients with well-differentiated thyroid cancer, there is controversy about the prognostic importance of a large number of positive neck nodes and the potential value of radioiodine therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate this issue in the group of patients for whom it is most clinically important — those with classic histology and favorable T and M stage.Materials and methodsTwenty-five patients met the following inclusion criteria: classic histology of papillary or follicular thyroid carcinoma treated with total thyroidectomy and neck dissection followed by adjuvant I-131 treatment in our department between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2013; adult age of > 21 years; and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC ) stage (8^th edition) of T0–3, N1b with ≥ 5 positive nodes, and M0.ResultsThe median positive node number was 10 (range, 5–31). The median adjuvant I-131 dose was 158 mCi (range, 150–219 mCi). The median follow-up in patients without recurrence after treatment was 7.3 years. The 10-year actuarial rates were favorable: overall survival, 100%; freedom from visible recurrence, 82%; and visible or biochemical recurrence, 72%.ConclusionRecurrence was infrequent in our study population with ≥ 5 positive nodes following moderate-dose adjuvant I-131 treatment. These results are valuable in directing initial adjuvant therapy and follow-up intensity. Our results do not inform the question of the use of postoperative thyroglobulin (Tg) level to select N1b patients for low-dose I-131 treatment.     

Dose-escalated neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced oesophageal or oesophagogastric junctional adenocarcinoma

BackgroundNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy with CROSS-protocol is the standard of care for locally advanced esophageal cancer. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate an improvement in complete pathological response (ypCR) after a dose-escalation neoadjuvant protocol compared to standard treatment. Secondary endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) and acute gastrointestinal toxicity.Material and methodsWe prospectively evaluated patients with locally advanced esophageal adenocarcinoma who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The radiation dose was 41.4 Gy in 23 fractions or 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions with weekly administration of six intravenous cycles of carboplatin AUC 2 mg/mL and intravenous paclitaxel 50 mg/m² followed by surgery.ResultsBetween December 2015 and July 2020, 21 patients were treated according to the reported radiation schedules. Median age was 61 years (57–67). 20 (95.2%) tumors were located at the esophagogastric junction and 1 (4.8%) in the middle esophagus. Five (23.8%) were stage II and 16 (76.2%) stage III. Twelve (57.1%) patients received 41.4 Gy (standard group) and 9 (42.9%) received 50.4 Gy (intensification group), with 5 (41.67%) and 5 (55.6%) presenting ypCR in the standard and intensification group, respectively (p = 0.67). After a median follow-up of 17 months (8–30), DFS in the standard group was 17.78 months [95% (CI, confidence interval): 12.9–22.6] and 45.5 months (95% CI: 24.4–66.05) in the intensification group (p = 0.299). Grade III acute gastrointestinal toxicity was 16% and 33.33%, respectively (p = 0.552). Postoperative toxicity events ≥ Grade III were 5 (41.7%) and 4 (44.4%), respectively (p = 0.623).ConclusionsIn our study we found a trend towards a higher complete pathological response-rate and disease-free survival in the intensification group compared to the standard group, with no differences in gastrointestinal toxicity. Well-designed randomized and controlled trials are needed to obtain conclusive data.     

Shrinkage of the non-malignant prostate gland volume after receiving incidental radiotherapy for rectal cancer

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to assess the impact of coincidental radiotherapy on the volume of the non-malignant prostate gland in rectal cancer patients treated with neo-adjuvant radiotherapy.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective analysis, thirty male patients with rectal cancer who had neoadjuvant radiotherapy met the inclusion criteria. These patients had pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and at least one post-treatment MRI of the pelvis and the whole of their prostate volume received the full prescribed radiotherapy dose; 45 Gy in 25 fractions (n = 22), 45 Gy in 20 fractions (n = 4) and 25 Gy in 5 fractions (n = 4).ResultsThe median age of this patient cohort was 66 years (range: 30–87). With a median interval between pre-treatment MRI and first MRI post-treatment of 2 months (range: 1–11), the mean prostate volume reduced from 36.1 cm³ [standard deviation (SD) 14.2] pre-radiotherapy to 31.3 cm³ (SD 13.0) post radiotherapy and this difference was significant (p = 0.0004).ConclusionRadiotherapy may cause shrinkage in volume of normal (non-malignant) prostate. Further research is required in this field, since these results may be of some comfort to men contemplating the consequences of radiotherapy on their quality of life. The authors suggest recording flow-rate and international prostate symptom score (IPSS) during rectal radiotherapy as a next step.     

Proton re-irradiation of unresectable recurrent head and neck cancers

BackgroundThis study presents a retrospective analysis (efficacy and toxicity) of outcomes in patients with unresectable recurrence of previously irradiated head and neck (H&N) cancers treated with proton therapy. Locoregional recurrence is the main pattern of failure in the treatment of H&N cancers. Proton re-irradiation in patients with relapse after prior radiotherapy might be valid as promising as a challenging treatment option.Materials and methodsFrom November 2015 to January 2020, 30 patients with in-field recurrence of head and neck cancer, who were not suitable for surgery due to medical contraindications, tumor localization, or extent, received re-irradiation with intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Sites of retreatment included the aerodigestive tract (60%) and the base of skull (40%). The median total dose of prior radiotherapy was 55.0 Gy. The median time to the second course was 38 months. The median re-irradiated tumor volume was 158.1 cm³. Patients were treated with 2.0, 2.4, and 3.0 GyRBE per fraction, with a median equivalent dose (EQD₂) of 57.6 Gy (α/β = 10). Radiation-induced toxicity was recorded according to the RTOG/EORTC criteria.ResultsThe 1- and 2-year local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 52.6/21.0, 21.9/10.9, and 73.4/8.4%, respectively, with a median follow-up time of 21 months. The median overall survival was 16 months. Acute grade 3 toxicity was observed in one patient (3.3%). There were five late severe side effects (16.6%), with one death associated with re-irradiation.ConclusionRe-irradiation with a proton beam can be considered a safe and efficient treatment even for a group of patients with unresectable recurrent H&N cancers.     

Clinical Predictors of Survival for Patients with Stage IV Cancer Referred to Radiation Oncology

BackgroundThere is an urgent need for a robust, clinically useful predictive model for survival in a heterogeneous group of patients with metastatic cancer referred to radiation oncology.MethodsFrom May 2012 to August 2013, 143 consecutive patients with stage IV cancer were prospectively evaluated by a single radiation oncologist. We retrospectively analyzed the effect of 29 patient, laboratory and tumor-related prognostic factors on overall survival using univariate analysis. Variables that were statistically significant on univariate analysis were entered into a multivariable Cox regression to identify independent predictors of overall survival.ResultsThe median overall survival was 5.5 months. Four prognostic factors significantly predicted survival on multivariable analysis including ECOG performance status (0–1 vs. 2 vs. 3–4), number of active tumors (1 to 5 vs. ≥6), albumin levels (≥3.4 vs. 2.4 to 3.3 vs. <2.4 and primary tumor site (Breast, Kidney or Prostate vs. Other). Risk group stratification was performed by assigning points for adverse prognostic factors resulting in very low, low, intermediate and high risk groups. The median survival was >31.4 months for very low risk patients compared to 14.5 months for low risk, 4.1 months for intermediate risk and 1.2 months for high risk (p<0.001).ConclusionsThese data suggest that a model that considers performance status, extent of disease, primary tumor site and serum albumin represents a simple model to accurately predict survival for patients with stage IV cancer who are potential candidates for radiation therapy.     

Adjuvant radiotherapy in malignant tumors of parotid. Experience of the Navarra Hospital Complex

BackgroundThe objective of the study was to review the outcome of patients with parotid cancer treated with postoperative radiotherapy at Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra in the last ten years.Materials and methodsWe retrospectively reviewed patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy between January 2008 and December 2018. We analyzed demographic data, histopathologic findings, local control (LC) and overall survival (OS).ResultsA total of 40 patients received postoperative radiotherapy during the period mentioned. There were 22 men (55%) and 18 women (45%). Median age was 58 years (19–90). By tumor histology, the most common was squamous cell carcinoma (22.5%) followed by ex-pleomorphic adenoma (15%) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (10%). According to Surgery, 19 patients (47.5%) underwent a total parotidectomy, 20 (50%) partial parotidectomy, and 1 (2.5%) a radical parotidectomy. Twenty-one patients (51.2%) underwent cervical dissection, most of them being supraomohyoid (31.7%). Reasons for adjuvant RT were: R1 resection (35% of the patients), high grade tumors (27.5%) and 17.5% because R1 surgery and R1. Radiation was administered using IMRT in most patients to a total dose of 60 Gy in 30 fractions. The 5-year overall survival (OS) (Kaplan-Meier) was 81% (95% CI: 68.5–96.2%), and 10-years — 64%. The 5-year local control (LC) (Kaplan-Meier) was 82.4% (95% CI: 91.46–73.33%) and the 10-year LC — 72.2% (95% CI: 54.9–96%). To date, only 4 patients (10%) have died due to their parotid tumor.ConclusionThe adjuvant radiotherapy added to surgery, significantly reduces the risk of recurrence in high-risk patients with a very acceptable survival rate.     

Phase I dose escalation trial of stereotactic radiotherapy prior to robotic prostatectomy in high risk prostate cancer

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to investigate the safety of combining preoperative stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) with robotic radical prostatectomy (RP) for high risk prostate cancer (HRCaP). Many patients with HRCaP will require adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after RP. The addition of preoperative SBRT before RP may spare patients from subsequent prolonged courses of RT.Materials and methodsEligible patients had NCC N HRCaP and received a total of 25 Gy or 30 Gy in five daily fractions of SBRT to the prostate and seminal vesicles followed by robotic RP with pelvic lymphadenectomy 31–45 days later. The primary endpoint was prevalence of acute genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity. Secondary endpoints were patient-reported quality of life (QOL) and biochemical recurrence (BcR).ResultsThree patients received preoperative SBRT to 25 Gy and four received 30 Gy. Median follow-up was 18 months. Highest toxicity was grade 2 and 3 in six (85.7%) and one (14.3%) patients, respectively. All patients developed grade 2 erectile dysfunction and 4 of 7 (57%) developed grade 2 urinary incontinence (UI) within a month after surgery. One patient developed acute grade 3 UI, but there was no grade ≥ 4 toxicity. One patient experienced acute grade 2 hemorrhoidal bleeding. On QOL, acute GU complaints were common and peaked within 3 months. Bowel symptoms were mild. Two patients with pN+ experienced BcR.ConclusionsPreoperative SBRT before robotic RP in HRCaP is feasible and safe. The severity of acute GU toxicity with preoperative SBRT may be worse than RP alone, while bowel toxicity was mild.     

Radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases using volumetric modulated arc therapy: a single institutional series

BackgroundPatients with brain metastases (BM) live longer due to improved diagnosis and oncologic treatments. The association of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) with brain radiosurgery (SRS) allows complex dose distributions and faster treatment delivery to multiple lesions.Materials and methodsThis study is a retrospective analysis of SRS for brain metastasis using VMAT. The primary endpoints were local disease-free survival (LDFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were intracranial disease-free survival (IDFS) and meningeal disease-free survival (MDFS).ResultsThe average number of treated lesions was 5.79 (range: 2–20) per treatment in a total of 113 patients. The mean prescribed dose was 18 Gy (range: 12–24 Gy). The median LDFS was 46 months. The LDFS in 6, 12, and 24 months was for 86%, 79%, and 63%, respectively. Moreover, brain progression occurred in 50 patients. The median overall survival was 47 months. The OS in 75%, 69%, and 61% patients was 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. IDFS was 6 and 24 months in 35% and 14% patients, respectively. The mean MDFS was 62 months; it was 6 and 24 months for 87% and 83% of patients. Acute severe toxicity was relatively rare. During follow-up, the rates of radionecrosis and neurocognitive impairment were low (10%).ConclusionThe use of VMAT–SRS for multiple BM was feasible, effective, and associated with low treatment-related toxicity rates. Thus, treatment with VMAT is a safe technique to plan to achieve local control without toxicity.     

Feasibility of Elective Nodal Irradiation (ENI) and Involved Field Irradiation (IFI) in Radiotherapy for the Elderly Patients (Aged ≥ 70 Years) with Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Institute

PurposeWe conducted a retrospective analysis to assess the feasibility of involved field irradiation (IFI) in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC).ResultsA total of 137 patients were enrolled. Fifty-four patients (39.4%) were allocated to the ENI group and 83 patients (60.6%) to the IFI group, the median doses in the two groups were 60 Gy and 59.4 Gy, respectively. For the entire group, the median survival time (MST) and PFS were 16 months and 12 months, respectively. The median PFS and 3-year PFS rate in the ENI group were 13 months and 20.6%, compared to 11 months and 21.0% in the IFI groups (p = 0.61). The MST and 3-year OS rate in the ENI and IFI groups were 17 months and 26.4% and 15.5 months and 21.7%, respectively (p = 0.25). The rate of grade ≥ 3 acute irradiation esophagitis in the ENI group was significantly higher than that in the IFI group (18.5% vs. 6.0%; p = 0.027). Other grade ≥ 3 treatment-related toxicities did not significantly differ between the two groups.ConclusionsIFI resulted in decreased irradiation toxicities without sacrificing OS in elderly patients with ESCC.