Spinal metastases: From conventional fractionated radiotherapy to single-dose SBRT

AimTo review the recent evolution of spine SBRT with emphasis on single dose treatments.BackgroundRadiation treatment of spine metastases represents a challenging problem in clinical oncology, because of the high risk of inflicting damage to the spinal cord. While conventional fractionated radiation therapy still constitutes the most commonly used modality for palliative treatment, notwithstanding its efficacy in terms of palliation of pain, local tumor control has been approximately 60%. This limited effectiveness is due to previous lack of technology to precisely target the tumor while avoiding the radiosensitive spinal cord, which constitutes a dose-limiting barrier to tumor cure.Materials and methodsA thorough review of the available literature on spine SBRT has been carried out and critically assessed.ResultsStereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) emerges as an alternative, non-invasive high-precision approach, which allows escalation of tumor dose, while effectively sparing adjacent uninvolved organs at risk. Engaging technological advances, such as on-line Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT), coupled with Dynamic Multi-Leaf Collimation (DMLC) and rapid intensity-modulated (IMRT) beam delivery, have promoted an interactive image-guided (IGRT) approach that precisely conforms treatment onto a defined target volume with a rapid dose fall-off to collateral non-target tissues, such as the spinal cord. Recent technological developments allow the use of the high-dose per fraction mode of hypofractionated SBRT for spinal oligometastatic cancer, even if only a few millimeters away from the tumor.ConclusionSingle-dose spine SBRT, now increasingly implemented, yields unprecedented outcomes of local tumor ablation and safety, provided that advanced technology is employed.     

Appropriate endpoints for stereotactic body radiotherapy for bone metastasis: Classification into five treatment groups

Treatment of bone metastasis using stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is being widely used in clinical practice. The reported clinical advantages of SBRT include high pain and local control rates, high response rates against bone metastasis from radio-resistant tumors, and safe re-irradiations. Although most reports in the literature use local control as the primary treatment endpoint, this endpoint is not appropriate because local control does not relate directly to patient benefit. Herein, we proposed five pathophysiology-based patient groups, as well as appropriate endpoints for each group.     

Stereotactic radiotherapy for early lung cancer: Evidence-based approach and future directions

AimTo review key studies evaluating stereotactic radiotherapy in the setting of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) for inoperable or high-risk patients, and discuss areas of ongoing research and clinical trials.BackgroundThe use of stereotactic radiotherapy for the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has increased rapidly over the past decade. Numerous studies have reported outcomes for patients treated with SBRT who are unfit for surgical resection, or at high risk of surgical complications.Materials and methodsA narrative review.ResultsThe preponderance of evidence suggests that SBRT is associated with excellent local control (∼90% at 3 years) and a favorable toxicity profile. In patients with higher operative risks, such as the elderly and patients with severe COPD, SBRT may provide a less-toxic treatment than surgery with similar oncologic outcomes. Ongoing studies are evaluating the use of SBRT for locally advanced or oligometastatic NSCLC.ConclusionsA large body of evidence now exists to support the use of SBRT for early-stage NSCLC. Decisions regarding the optimal choice of treatment should be individualized, and made in the context of a multidisciplinary team.     

Extracranial stereotactic body radiotherapy. Review of main SBRT features and indications in primary tumors

Aim

Review of main SBRT features and indications in primary tumors.

Background

Stereotactic body radiotherapy has been developed in the last few years. SBRT allows the hypofractionated treatment of extra cranial tumors, using either a single or limited number of dose fractions, and resulting in the delivery of a high biological effective dose with low toxicity.

Material and methods

SBRT requires a high level of accuracy for all phases of the treatment process: effective patient immobilization, precise target localization, highly conformed dosimetry and image guided systems for treatment verification. The implementation of SBRT in routine requires a careful considering of organ motion. Gating and tracking are effective ways to do so, and less invasive technologies “fiducials free” have been developed. Due to the hypofractionated scheme, the physician must pay attention to new dosimetric constraints in organ at risk and new radiobiological models are needed to assess the optimal fractionation and dose schemes.

Results

Currently, SBRT is safe and effective to treat primary tumors, which are otherwise untreatable with conventional radiotherapy or surgery. SBRT has quickly developed because of its excellent results in terms of tolerance and its high locoregional control rates. SBRT indications in primary tumors, such as lung primary tumors, have become a standard of care for inoperable patients. SBRT seems to be effective in many others indications in curative or palliative intent such as liver primary tumors, and novel indications and strategies are currently emerging in prostate cancer, head and neck tumor recurrences or pelvis reirradiations.

Conclusion

Currently, SBRT is mainly used when there is no other therapeutic alternative for the patient. This is due to the lack of randomized trials in these settings. However, the results shown in retrospective studies let us hope to impose SBRT as a new standard of care for many patients in the next few years.     

SBRT for lung oligometastases: Who is the perfect candidate?

AimTo analyze the literature data about lung oligometastatic patients who underwent SBRT with regard to doses, fractionation, outcomes, response assessment and prognostic factors, trying to define “the right patient” for the local treatment.Background“Oligometastatic disease” is defined as a state in which metastases are limited in number and site and characterized by unusual cancer biology and behavior. In this setting local therapy could have a potential curative role. Recently, technological advances in Radiation Oncology permitted the introduction of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT), a novel treatment modality that delivers ablative dose of radiation to the extra-cranial sites with high precision using single or a small number of fractions.Materials and methodsWe performed a literature search using Medical Subject Heading terms “stereotactic body radiation therapy” and “lung metastases”, considering a period of 10 years.ResultsMany non-randomized studies have shown that SBRT for lung oligometastases is safe and effective, with local control rates of about 80%. To date SBRT represents an alternative and competitive option in patients with lung oligometastatic disease who refuse surgical treatment or unsuitable for surgery. Based on published studies, SBRT might have major benefit for a patient with breast histology, disease-free interval ≥12 months, control of the primary tumor, small lesions, limited number of lesions and higher radiation dose delivered.ConclusionsWell-designed collaborative trials are necessary to draw final conclusions. To date, the discussion within a multidisciplinary team becomes crucial to perform a careful patients’ selection in the setting of oligometastatic disease.     

非小细胞肺癌体部寡转移的立体定向放射治疗

非小细胞肺癌(Non-small cell lung cancer, NSCLC)寡转移是NSCLC转移过程中的一种中间状态,是肿瘤生物侵袭过程中较温和的一个阶段,它介于原发灶与远处广泛转移之间,转移瘤数目≦5个,受累器官≦2个,此时肿瘤细胞尚不具备全身播散的倾向。晚期恶性肿瘤患者很大部分处于寡转移状态,而约30%的非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者死于寡转移,目前对于寡转移的治疗以局部治疗为主(包括手术、放疗以及射频消融)。治疗隐匿性转移灶、寡转移灶及全身化学治疗结束后清除残留局部病灶成为治疗寡转移的关键,越来越得到专家共识。在无法手术或者拒绝手术的患者中,局部放放射治疗凸显巨大优势,尤其是体部立体定向放射治疗(Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy, SBRT),大量临床研究结果显示体部立体定向放射治疗NSCLC寡转移是安全有效的,并能提高转移灶的局部控制率。本文旨在对SBRT治疗非小细胞肺癌寡转移的临床进展做一综述。     

Use of local anaesthesia for pain management during husbandry procedures in Australian sheep flocks

Mulesing (removal of breech skin for blowfly strike control), castration, tail-docking and ear-knotching are routine husbandry procedures conducted on many millions of lambs annually in Australia, causing considerable pain and suffering. However, establishing an effective alternative to mulesing is proving to be a difficult and prolonged process. This is particularly so for producers of high-quality fine wool from Merino sheep that have been selected over many generations for skin wrinkle to increase yields, increasing their susceptibility to flystrike by Lucilia cuprina. In late 2005, a spray-on product formulation containing two topical analgesia agents (lignocaine and bupivacaine) for pain relief at mulesing has become commercially available. Increasingly, fine-wool growers have been choosing to continue surgical mulesing, but adopting pain alleviation at surgical mulesing to reduce suffering. This product has led to the development of the “Better Choices” program, in an effort to meet international concerns that mulesing without pain relief was cruel. Studies have been conducted on the use of these products for decrease of pain induced by surgical mulesing, castration and tail-docking. A technique has been developed to measure pain through assessment of wound sensitivity using Von-Frey Hair stimulation, measuring local involuntary reflexes and central cognition. These responses were graded using a numerical rating scale. Behavioural responses to pain were analysed by video. A novel technique was developed to assess the rate of wound healing by digital photography and computerized surface area measurement. Also, a method of application was developed at castration, which enabled analgesia of the remaining scrotal contents, with impressive results compared to other methods of castration such as the use of rubber rings. Findings from a series of field and pen trials indicate that the immediate application of spray-on topical anaesthesia to mulesing, castration and tail-docking wounds, significantly reduced the pain experienced post-procedure and improved the rate of wound healing. Increasing adoption by producers of pain relief for lambs during surgical routine husbandry procedures offers a new welfare-conscious paradigm for the Australian wool industry. This development has potential application to several species undergoing many livestock procedures throughout the world and offers a simple part solution to address the increasingly important and emerging global issue of welfare conscious agriculture.     

Analysis of the efficacy,safety and survival factors of stereotactic body radiation therapy in patients with recurrence of pancreatic cancer

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) using Cyber Knife (CK) in the treatment of patients with recurrent pancreatic cancer after surgery, and analyze its survival-related factors. Methods: The primary endpoint was freedom from local progression (FFLP) and local control (LC) rate after CK. The secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), symptom relief and toxicities. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the optimal cut-off values of inflammatory composite indicators NLR, PLR, SII and PNI. The prognostic factors that affected these patients were analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis, respectively. Results: A total of 27 patients were enrolled. Median local recurrence disease free interval（DFI）was 11.3 (1.3-30.6) months, LC was 81.5% and 37.0% at 6 and 12 months, respectively. Median PFS was 7.1 (1.3-27.1) months. Median OS was 11.3 (1.3-30.6) months. Symptom alleviation was observed in 16 of 17 patients (94.1%) within 2 weeks after CK. Subsequent chemotherapy, CA199≥50% decrease after CK were independent prognostic factors for OS (all P <0.05). Conclusion: SBRT is a safe and effective treatment approach for recurrent pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Encouraging local control rate, low toxicity, and effective symptom relief suggests the vital role of CK in the treatment of these patients. This clinical application needs to be further studied in the combination of CK and multimodal therapy.     

MRI-guided lung SBRT: Present and future developments

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is rapidly becoming an alternative to surgery for the treatment of early-stage non-small cell lung cancer patients. Lung SBRT is administered in a hypo-fractionated, conformal manner, delivering high doses to the target. To avoid normal-tissue toxicity, it is crucial to limit the exposure of nearby healthy organs-at-risk (OAR).Current image-guided radiotherapy strategies for lung SBRT are mostly based on X-ray imaging modalities. Although still in its infancy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance for lung SBRT is not exposure-limited and MRI promises to improve crucial soft-tissue contrast. Looking beyond anatomical imaging, functional MRI is expected to inform treatment decisions and adaptations in the future.This review summarises and discusses how MRI could be advantageous to the different links of the radiotherapy treatment chain for lung SBRT: diagnosis and staging, tumour and OAR delineation, treatment planning, and inter- or intrafractional motion management. Special emphasis is placed on a new generation of hybrid MRI treatment devices and their potential for real-time adaptive radiotherapy.     

Critical review on the efficacy and safety of levobupivacaine peritonsillar infiltration

Levobupivacaine is a long-acting local anesthetic that is both safe and non-toxic. However, few researchers have examined the efficacy and safety of peritonsillar injections of levobupivacaine for postoperative pain relief. The goal of this study was to assess current randomized controlled trials that employed this strategy. A literature review was conducted using databases such as DELPHIS, PUBMED, COCHRANE, and SCOPUS. A total of fifteen randomized controlled trials were found and thoroughly reviewed. There were no fatalities reported. One study reported a case of nausea and vomiting. In most of the studies, levobupivacaine with magnesium, epinephrine, dexamethasone hydrochloride, tramadol, or levobupivacaine alone were compared to a placebo. Four trials employed different combinations of levobupivacaine and other medicines to recruit adults. Most of the studies had a modest sample size. As a result, larger research with more representative populations should be conducted. Despite certain flaws in the trial design, our findings suggest that levobupivacaine is safe and effective at reducing postoperative pain.     

What is the evidence for the clinical value of SBRT in cancer of the cervix?

AimThe aim of this review is to describe and analyze indications and results of the use of SBRT in uterine cervix cancer, reviewing articles published from January 2010 up to August 2017, for any one of the four indications listed:

• 1Patient refusal or anatomic impediments to interstitial or intracavitary brachytherapy (BCT), i.e. SBRT as an “alternative” for BCT;
• 2Patients with voluminous tumors, or asymmetric tumors where BCT alone would not achieve curative doses, i.e. SBRT as a primary adjunct to BCT;
• 3Pelvic and para aortic adenopathy where SBRT could be used as a boost, i.e. SBRT as a primary adjunct to external beam pelvic radiotherapy;
• 4Small volume recurrences (postoperative or post radiotherapy), i.e. SBRT for salvage.

BackgroundCervix cancer standard treatment involves pelvic irradiation and chemotherapy, recent advances in irradiation techniques might offer new possible approaches.Material and methodsSystematic review of the English language literature about Cervix cancer, SBRT, published from January 2010 to January 2018 identified through a database search of PubMed, and Ovid MEDLINE, using pre-defined search phrases.ResultsThe results in the literature, in general, demonstrate rather weak efficacy of SBRT. In this review, we did not find strong evidence to recommend routine SBRT as a primary treatment for cervico-uterine cancers, i.e. as a replacement for BCT; in highly selected cases it might be considered useful as salvage therapy for relapsed cervix cancer.ConclusionThe existing data to not warrant recommending SBRT for the definitive treatment of cervix cancer, but may have some value in the recurrent/relapsed setting.     

Current methods of controlling post-operative pain.

Until recently, the clinical significance of post-surgical pain and its undertreatment were for the most part unappreciated. Recognition that inadequate analgesia adversely affects the patient's cardiovascular, pulmonary, and emotional status has spurred development of new and highly effective methods of controlling pain. With the introduction of spinal opioid and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) came the realization that, while such forms of therapy provided superior pain relief, they were not without their own unique and occasionally serious side effects. For this reason, both techniques are more safely provided by highly trained members of a dedicated acute/post-surgical pain service. Although spinal opioid (epidural, intrathecal) techniques are invasive and require patient cooperation, they have a high degree of safety in low-risk populations (ASA 1 and 2). The major therapeutic advantage of spinal opioids is their ability to prevent pain from being perceived. PCA permits patients to titrate intravenous opioids in proportion to their particular level of pain intensity. Although PCA provides effective pain "relief," the technique is incapable of preventing pain from being appreciated. A number of studies have observed that pain scores in patients successfully employing PCA were significantly higher than those noted in individuals treated with epidural opioids. Nevertheless, the control gained by self-administration, uniformity of analgesia, and low level of adverse results associated with PCA provides higher patient satisfaction and decreased sedation when compared with traditional intramuscular dosing. The effectiveness of PCA may be improved by adjusting for patient variables, utilizing opioids having rapid onset, the addition of a basal infusion, and supplementation with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents. Interpleural analgesia represents an important therapeutic option in patients sensitive to opioid-induced respiratory depression. The technique is more effective when local anesthetic solutions are continually infused. Analgesic efficacy may be further enhanced by the addition of "low-dose" PCA.     

THE TREATMENT OF METASTATIC BREAST CANCER IN BONE

The author report clinical experience with 212 cases of mammary cancer metastatic to bone, in 186 of which radiotherapy was given, and in 26 steroid hormone therapy.At least 70 per cent of patients with bone metastasis from breast cancer were relieved of pain by adequate roentgen therapy, the relief lasting for most of the survival time in many instances.About 25 per cent of patients had recalcification or reossification of bony lesions with roentgen therapy; while dramatic, this is not always an indication that relief of pain will continue or that survival time will be lengthened.If and when adequate radiotherapy has not been effective or cannot be administered (for example, in a patient with extremely widespread metastasis, or one residing at a considerable distance from radiotherapeutic service) steroid hormone therapy in adequate dosage is frequently beneficial. From 40 per cent to 75 per cent of patients with bone metastases from breast cancer are relieved of pain by steroid hormone therapy. In about 15 per cent of cases recalcification of the lesion occurs.Effective roentgen therapy may usually be given in a relatively brief period of time (one to two weeks). Effective steroid hormone therapy usually requires from 12 to 24 weeks.Complications of steroid hormone therapy are numerous. Some patients are made considerably worse by such therapy. These complications may only be controlled by reduction or discontinuation of the hormones. For this reason, it is recommended that irradiation always be used as the initial method of palliation.     

肝转移癌放射治疗进展

过去的几十年,在肝转移癌的治疗方面,放疗已经越来越多的应用于临床。对于局部肝转移癌,临床上往往采取加大剂量已提高局部控制率,以期提高患者生产期。但是,对于有症状的广泛性肝转移患者则给以全肝低剂量照射。放疗已成为不适合手术或化疗等方式的肝转移癌患者的有效治疗手段。放疗靶区勾画及放疗技术进步更好的保护了高剂量靶区周围的正常肝脏组织,使得提高靶区放疗剂量的手段很好的应用于临床。关于肝转移癌的适形与立体定向放疗治疗的提高局控率及生存期的临床研究不断出现。本文就局部肝转移的根治放疗与全肝的姑息放疗临床数据做相关综述,认为放疗在肝转移癌的治疗中是安全,有效的。但是,肝转移癌的临床随机试验研究仍较匮乏。     

Tennis elbow and the cervical spine.

The exact cause of tennis elbow, a common condition, is still obscure. While the condition may well be entirely due to a local disorder at the elbow, the results of a study of 50 patients whose condition was resistant to 4 weeks of treatment directed to the elbow suggest that the underlying condition may have been (at least in these patients) a reflex localization of pain from radiculopathy at the cervical spine. Clinical, radiologic and electromyographic findings supported this suggestion. The pain was demonstrated to be muscular tenderness, which was maximal and specific at motor points. Treatment directed to the cervical spine appeared to give relief in the majority of patients. The more resistant the condition, the more severe were the radiologic and electromyographic findings in the cervical spine.     

Treatment of Solitary Painful Osseous Metastases with Radiotherapy,Cryoablation or Combined Therapy: Propensity Matching Analysis in 175 Patients

Purpose

aim of this study was to identify outcomes in pain relief and quality of life in patients with a solitary painful osseous metastasis treated by radiotherapy, cryoablation or the combination using a propensity score matching study design.

Materials and Methods

175 patients with painful bone metastases were included in the study. Twenty-five of them underwent a radiation course (20 Gy in five daily fractions) 15 days after the cryoablation. These subjects were retrospectively matched by propensity analysis with a group of subjects treated by radiotherapy (125 subjects) and with a group treated byCryoablation (25 subjects). The pain relief in terms of complete response, rate of subjects requiring analgesics after treatments and the changes in self-rated quality of life were measured. Informed consent was obtained from the subject and the study was approved by the local Ethical Committee.

Results

An higher proportion of subjects treated by cryoablation (32%) or cryoablation followed by RT (72%;) experienced a complete response compared with patients treated by radiotherapy alone (11.2%). After Bonferroni correction strategy, the addition of radiotherapy to cryoablation significantly improved the rate of complete response compared with cryoablation alone (p = 0.011) and this paralleled with an improved self-rated quality of life. Seventeen subjects (13.6%) of patients in the radiotherapy group, 9 (36%) in the cryoablation group, and 19 (76)% in the cryoablation- radiotherapy group did not require narcotic medications.

Conclusions

The addition of radiotherapy to cryoablation favorably impacts on perceived pain, with a favorable toxicity profile. However, our data should be interpreted with caution and could serve as a framework around which to design future trials.     

Is Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in lymph node oligometastatic patients feasible and effective?

ObjectivesTo review the available data about stereotactic body-radiotherapy (SBRT) for oligometastatic lymph node cancer recurrence.MethodsThe inclusion criteria for this study were as follows: Medline search for the (1) English language (2) full paper (abstracts were excluded) on (3) adult oligometastatic solid cancer recurrence limited to lymph node that underwent SBRT (4) outcome data available and (5) published up to the 30th April 2014.Results38 papers fulfilling the inclusion criteria have been found: 7 review articles and 31 patient series (20 and 11 retrospective and prospective studies, respectively) including between 1 and 69 patients (636 lymph nodes). Twelve articles reported only lymph node SBRT while in 19 – all types of SBRT including lymph node SBRT were presented. Two-year local control, 4-year progression free survival and overall survival was of up to 100%, 30% and 50%, respectively. The progression was mainly out-field (10–30% of patients had a recurrence in another lymph node/nodes). The toxicity was low with mainly mild acute events and single grade 3–4 late events. When compared to SBRT for any oligometastatic cancer, SBRT for lymph node recurrence carried better prognosis and showed lower toxicity.ConclusionsSBRT is a feasible approach for oligometastatic lymph node recurrence, offering excellent in-field tumor control with low toxicity profile. The potential abscopal effect has been hypothesized as a basis of these findings. Future studies are warranted to identify the patients that benefit most from this treatment. The optimal combination with systemic treatment should also be defined.     

Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) of adrenal gland metastases in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease

BackgroundStereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as a form of noninvasive treatment that is becoming increasingly used to manage cancers with adrenal gland metastases. There is a paucity of data on safety and efficacy of this modality. The aim of the study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adrenal gland SBRT in oligometastatic and oligoprogressive disease.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective study, we performed a single-institution analysis of 26 adrenal lesions from 23 patients with oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease treated from 2013 to 2019 with the goal of achieving durable local control. Palliative cases were excluded. Radiation dosimetry data was collected. Kaplan Meier product estimator and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis were used for statistical analysis.ResultsThe median dose was 36 Gy in 3 fractions (range: 24–50 Gy and 3–6 fractions) with a median biologically effective dose (BED10) of 72 (range: 40–100). 1-year local control rate was 80% and median local control was not achieved due to a low number of failures. 1- and 2-year overall survival rates were 66% and 32%. Toxicity was mild with only one case of grade 2 nausea and no grade 3–5 toxicity. Higher neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio was associated with worse overall survival and a trend toward worse progression-free survival. In addition, worse performance status and lower BED10 were associated with worse survival. No such association could be shown for primary tumor location, histology, size or stage.ConclusionAdrenal SBRT for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease is a safe and effective form of treatment.     

Radiation-induced vascular damage in tumors: implications of vascular damage in ablative hypofractionated radiotherapy (SBRT and SRS)

We have reviewed the studies on radiation-induced vascular changes in human and experimental tumors reported in the last several decades. Although the reported results are inconsistent, they can be generalized as follows. In the human tumors treated with conventional fractionated radiotherapy, the morphological and functional status of the vasculature is preserved, if not improved, during the early part of a treatment course and then decreases toward the end of treatment. Irradiation of human tumor xenografts or rodent tumors with 5-10 Gy in a single dose causes relatively mild vascular damages, but increasing the radiation dose to higher than 10 Gy/fraction induces severe vascular damage resulting in reduced blood perfusion. Little is known about the vascular changes in human tumors treated with high-dose hypofractionated radiation such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). However, the results for experimental tumors strongly indicate that SBRT or SRS of human tumors with doses higher than about 10 Gy/fraction is likely to induce considerable vascular damages and thereby damages the intratumor microenvironment, leading to indirect tumor cell death. Vascular damage may play an important role in the response of human tumors to high-dose hypofractionated SBRT or SRS.     

Estimation of delivered dose to lung tumours considering setup uncertainties and breathing motion in a cohort of patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy

IntroductionDose-response relationships for local control of lung tumours treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have proved ambiguous, however, these have been based on the prescribed or planned dose. Delivered dose to the target may be a better predictor for local control. In this study, the probability of the delivered minimum dose to the clinical target volume (CTV) in relation to the prescribed dose was estimated for a cohort of patients, considering geometrical uncertainties.Materials and methodsDelivered doses were retrospectively simulated for 50 patients treated with SBRT for lung tumours, comparing two image-guidance techniques: pre-treatment verification computed tomography (IG1) and online cone-beam computed tomography (IG2). The prescribed dose was typically to the 67% isodose line of the treatment plan. Simulations used in-house software that shifted the static planned dose according to a breathing motion and sampled setup/matching errors. Each treatment was repeatedly simulated, generating a multiplicity of dose-volume histograms (DVH). From these, tumour-specific and population-averaged statistics were derived.ResultsFor IG1, the probability that the minimum CTV dose (D_98%) exceeded 100% of the prescribed dose was 90%. With IG2, this probability increased to 99%.ConclusionsDoses below the prescribed dose were delivered to a considerably larger part of the population prior to the introduction of online soft-tissue image-guidance. However, there is no clear evidence that this impacts local control, when compared to previous published data.