The rigor configuration of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin trapped by a zero-length cross-linker

When chicken gizzard heavy meromyosin (HMM) in its rigor complex with actin was reacted with the zero-length cross-linker 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide (EDC), HMM cross-linked with actin but also the two heads of the HMM molecule cross-linked to each other [Onishi, H., Maita, T., Matsuda, G., & Fujiwara, K. (1989) Biochemistry 28, 1898-1904, 1905-1912]. By ultracentrifugal fractionation of the EDC-treated acto-HMM in the presence of Mg-ATP, we obtained a preparation enriched for gizzard HMM with cross-linked heads. When HMM molecules in this preparation were rotary-shadowed and observed in an electron microscope, many head pairs were in contact with each other. The amount of HMM with cross-linked heads determined by electron microscopy was equal to that of the cross-linked NH2-terminal 24K tryptic fragments of HMM heavy chains determined by NaDodSO4 gel electrophoresis, indicating that this cross-linking is primarily responsible for the contact observed between two HMM heads. Most pairs of the contacted heads originated in the same HMM molecule, although a few pairs belonged to different HMM molecules. Cross-linking between the two heads of the same HMM molecule appeared to occur within the distal, more globular half of each head. However, the cross-linking sites were located at different positions within the globular portion. The actin-activated Mg-ATPase activity of the HMM sample treated with EDC in the presence of actin increased in a biphasic manner, depending on the concentration of F-actin, with two apparent association constants: 2.9 x 10(4) M-1 and one much less than 1 x 10(4) M-1. Since the apparent association constant obtained with the HMM control was similar to the latter value, the association constant for HMM molecules with cross-linked heads was identified to be the former value. The binding of HMM to actin was thus strengthened at least by a factor of 3 by the cross-linking between two HMM heads. These results suggest that HMM heads are trapped by treatment with EDC in the rigor complex configuration and that this configuration is retained even after the HMM has been released from actin. The EDC reactivity of rabbit skeletal muscle HMM, however, was different from that of chicken gizzard HMM. The treatment of acto-HMM complexes with EDC did not generate cross-linking between two skeletal muscle HMM heads.     

Evidence for the association between two myosin heads in rigor acto-smooth muscle heavy meromyosin

The rigor complexes that formed between rabbit skeletal muscle F-actin and chicken gizzard heavy meromyosin (HMM), in which the heavy chains had been cleaved with trypsin into 24K, 50K, and 68K fragments, were examined by using the zero-length chemical cross-linker 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide (EDC). Two cross-linked products of approximate Mr 115K and 60K were generated. These products were not obtained by EDC treatment of HMM in the absence of F-actin. The HMM fragments that participated in cross-linking were identified by fluorescent labeling and amino acid composition studies. The 115K peptide was determined to be a covalently cross-linked complex that formed between actin and the COOH-terminal 68K fragment of the HMM heavy chain. Our results are in agreement with a previous study which proposed that the site of cross-linking between HMM and F-actin resides within the COOH-terminal 22K fragment of the myosin subfragment 1 heavy chain [Marianne-Pépin, T., Mornet, D., Bertrand, R., Labbé, J.-P., & Kassab, R. (1985) Biochemistry 24, 3024-3029]. The 60K peptide, however, was not a product of cross-linking between HMM and F-actin. On the basis of its amino acid composition, we concluded that this 60K peptide was a cross-linked dimer of the NH2-terminal 24K fragments of the HMM heavy chain. The cross-linking of acto-gizzard HMM significantly increased the Mg-ATPase activity of gizzard HMM without any observable phosphorylation of the regulatory (20K) light chains.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Lys-65 and Glu-168 are the residues for carbodiimide-catalyzed cross-linking between the two heads of rigor smooth muscle heavy meromyosin

We have previously demonstrated that the two heads of chicken gizzard heavy meromyosin (HMM) in a rigor complex with rabbit skeletal F-actin could be cross-linked by the water-soluble carbodiimide 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide. Here, we report the location of the cross-linked sites in the amino acid sequence of the HMM heavy chain. One of the cross-linked residues was identified as Glu-168 by sequencing the CN1.CN6 cross-linked peptide containing residues 1-77 (CN1) and 164-203 (CN6). This site is located close to the ATP-binding site of HMM. Since the other site was further into the amino acid sequence of CN1, another cross-linked peptide corresponding to residues 53-66 and 145-182 was isolated from the 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide-treated acto-tryptic gizzard HMM digested further by other proteolytic enzymes. The amino acid sequence of this peptide and its cyanogen bromide fragment indicated that the cross-linking occurred between Glu-168 and Lys-65. Our results suggests that these two amino acid side chains are in contact with each other in the acto-gizzard HMM rigor complex and participate in the electrostatic interaction between the two HMM heads bound to F-actin. Based on the head-to-head contact, we propose a three-dimensional model for the attachment of gizzard HMM heads to F-actin.     

Interaction of the heavy chain of gizzard myosin heads with skeletal F-actin

To probe the molecular properties of the actin recognition site on the smooth muscle myosin heavy chain, the rigor complexes between skeletal F-actin and chicken gizzard myosin subfragments 1 (S1) were investigated by limited proteolysis and by chemical cross-linking with 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethyl-amino)propyl]carbodiimide. Earlier, these approaches were used to analyze the actin site on the skeletal muscle myosin heads [Mornet, D., Bertrand, R., Pantel, P., Audemard, E., & Kassab, R. (1981) Biochemistry 20, 2110-2120; Labbé, J.P., Mornet, D., Roseau, G., & Kassab, R. (1982) Biochemistry 21, 6897-6902]. In contrast to the case of the skeletal S1, the cleavage with trypsin or papain of the sensitive COOH-terminal 50K-26K junction of the head heavy chain had no effect on the actin-stimulated Mg2+-ATPase activity of the smooth S1. Moreover, actin binding had no significant influence on the proteolysis at this site whereas it abolished the scission of the skeletal S1 heavy chain. The COOH-terminal 26K segment of the smooth papain S1 heavy chain was converted by trypsin into a 25K peptide derivative, but it remained intact in the actin-S1 complex. A single actin monomer was cross-linked with the carbodiimide reagent to the intact 97K heavy chain of the smooth papain S1. Experiments performed on the complexes between F-actin and the fragmented S1 indicated that the site of cross-linking resides within the COOH-terminal 25K fragment of the S1 heavy chain. Thus, for both the striated and smooth muscle myosins, this region appears to be in contact with F-actin.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Interaction between the heavy and the regulatory light chains in smooth muscle myosin subfragment 1.

The interaction between the heavy and the regulatory light chains within chicken gizzard myosin heads was investigated by using a zero-length chemical cross-linker, 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)-propyl]carbodiimide (EDC). The chicken gizzard subfragment 1 (S-1) used was treated with papain so that the heavy chain was partly cleaved into the NH2-terminal 72K and the COOH-terminal 24K fragments and the regulatory light chain into the 16K fragment. S-1 was reacted with EDC either alone or in the presence of ATP or F-actin. In all cases, the 16K fragment of the regulatory light chain formed a covalent cross-link with the 24K heavy chain fragment but not with the 72K fragment. The 38K cross-linked peptide, which was the product of cross-linking between the 16K light chain and the 24K heavy chain fragments, was isolated and further cleaved with cyanogen bromide and arginylendopeptidase. Smaller cross-linked peptides were purified by reverse-phase HPLC and then characterized by amino acid analysis and sequencing. The results indicated that cross-linking occurred between Lys-845 in the heavy chain and Asp-168, Asp-170, or Asp-171 in the regulatory light chain. The position of the cross-linked lysine was only three amino acid residues away from the invariant proline residue mapped as the S-1-rod hinge by McLachlan and Karn [McLachlan, A. D., & Karn, J. (1982) Nature (London) 299, 226-231]. We propose that the COOH-terminal region of the regulatory light chain is located in the neck region of myosin and that this region and the phosphorylation site of the regulatory light chain together may play a role in the phosphorylation-induced conformational change of gizzard myosin.     

Inhibition of sliding movement of F-actin by crosslinking emphasizes the role of actin structure in the mechanism of motility

The effects of crosslinking of monomeric and polymeric actin with 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)carbodiimide (EDC), disuccinimidyl suberate (DSS) and glutaraldehyde on the interaction with heavy meromyosin (HMM) in solution and on the sliding movement on glass-attached HMM were examined. The Vmax values of actin-activated HMM ATPase decreased in the following order: intact actin = EDC F-actin greater than DSS actin greater than glutaraldehyde F-actin = glutaraldehyde G-actin greater than EDC G-actin. The affinity of actin for HMM in the presence of ATP decreased in the following order: DSS actin greater than glutaraldehyde F-actin = glutaraldehyde G-actin greater than intact actin greater than EDC F-actin greater than EDC G-actin. However, sliding movement was inhibited only in the case of glutaraldehyde-crosslinked F and G-actin and EDC-crosslinked G-actin. Interestingly, after copolymerization of "non-motile" glutaraldehyde or EDC-crosslinked monomers with "motile" monomers of intact actin sliding of the copolymers was observed and its rate was independent of the type of crosslinked monomer, i.e. of the manner of their interaction with HMM. These data strongly indicate that inhibition of the sliding of actin by crosslinking cannot be explained entirely by changes in the Vmax value or affinity for myosin heads. We conclude that movement is generated by interaction of myosin with segments of F-actin containing a number of intact monomers, and the mechanism of inhibition involves an effect of the crosslinkers on the structure of F-actin itself.     

Difference between subfragment-1 and heavy meromyosin in their interaction with F-actin

To elucidate the difference between subfragment-1 and heavy meromyosin in their interaction with F-actin, we used limited tryptic digestion and cross-linking with 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]carbodiimide. The binding of actin to subfragment-1 lowers the susceptibility of the 50K-20K junction of its heavy chain to tryptic digestion. At a molar ratio of one actin to one subfragment-1, all the sites were gradually cleaved by trypsin whereas the sites were completely protected in the presence of a 2-fold molar excess of actin over subfragment-1. In the case of heavy meromyosin, nearly half of the sites were protected completely by the presence of an equimolar amount of actin to its heads suggesting that the two heads of heavy meromyosin bound actin in a different manner. The rate of the cross-linking reaction between subfragment-1 heavy chain and actin with 1-ethyl-3-[3-(dimethylamino) propyl]carbodiimide also depended on the molar ratio of actin to subfragment-1. The rate was maximum at a molar ratio of about 5 actin to 1 subfragment-1. When heavy meromyosin was cross-linked to actin, the maximum rate was observed at a molar ratio of about 3 actin to 1 heavy meromyosin head, the level being about 60% that for subfragment-1 and actin. It was suggested that the presence of the subfragment-2 portion of heavy meromyosin caused these differences by restricting the motion of the two heads.     

Cross-linking of the skeletal myosin subfragment 1 heavy chain to the N-terminal actin segment of residues 40-113

Glutaraldehyde (GA) and N-(ethoxycarbonyl)-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ), a hydrophobic, carboxyl group directed, zero-length protein cross-linker, were employed for the chemical cross-linking of the rigor complex between F-actin and the skeletal myosin S-1. The enzymatic properties and structure of the new covalent complexes obtained with both reagents were determined and compared to those known for the EDC-acto-S-1 complex. The GA- or EEDQ-catalyzed covalent attachment of F-actin to the S-1 heavy chain induced an elevated Mg2+-ATPase activity. The turnover rates of the isolated cross-linked complexes were similar to those for EDC-acto-S-1 (30 s-1). The solution stability of the new complexes is also comparable to that exhibited by EDC-acto-S-1. The proteolytic digestion of the isolated AEDANS-labeled covalent complexes and direct cross-linking experiments between actin and various preformed proteolytic S-1 derivatives indicated that, as observed with EDC, the COOH-terminal 20K and the central 50K heavy chain fragments are involved in the cross-linking reactions of GA and EEDQ. KI-depolymerized acto-S-1 complexes cross-linked by EDC, GA, or EEDQ were digested by thrombin which cuts only actin, releasing S-1 heavy chain-actin peptide cross-linked complexes migrating on acrylamide gels with Mr 100K (EDC), 110K and 105K (GA), and 102K (EEDQ); these were fluorescent only when fluorescent S-1 was used. They were identified by immunostaining with specific antibodies directed against selected parts of he NH2-terminal actin segment of residues 1-113.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Kinetics of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin with one thiophosphorylated head

Actin-activated MgATPase of smooth muscle heavy meromyosin is activated by thiophosphorylation of two regulatory light chains, one on each head domain. To understand cooperativity between heads, we examined the kinetics of heavy meromyosin (HMM) with one thiophosphorylated head. Proteolytic gizzard heavy meromyosin regulatory light chains were partially exchanged with recombinant thiophosphorylated His-tagged light chains, and HMM with one thiophosphorylated head was isolated by nickel-affinity chromatography. In vitro motility was observed. By steady-state kinetic analysis, one-head thiophosphorylated heavy meromyosin had a similar K(m) value for actin but a V(max) value of approximately 50% of the fully thiophosphorylated molecule. However, single turnover analysis, which is not sensitive to small amounts of active heads, showed that one-head thiophosphorylated heavy meromyosin was 46-120 times more active than unphosphorylated HMM but only 7-19% as active as the fully thiophosphorylated molecule. Discrepancy between the single turnover and steady-state values could be explained by a small fraction of rigor heads. These rigor heads would have a large effect on the steady-state kinetics of one-head thiophosphorylated HMM. In summary, thiophosphorylation of one head leads to a molecule with unique intermediate kinetics suggesting that thiophosphorylation of one head cooperatively alters the kinetics of the partner head and vice versa.     

A synthetic peptide of the N-terminus of actin interacts with myosin

Research reported from numerous laboratories suggested that the N-terminal region of actin contained one of the binding sites between actin and myosin. A synthetic peptide corresponding to residues 1-28 of skeletal actin was prepared by solid-phase peptide methodology. The formation of a complex between this peptide and myosin subfragment 1 (S1) was demonstrated by high-performance size-exclusion chromatography (pH 6.8). The actin peptide precipitated S1 at higher pH (7.4-8.2) but remained soluble when bound to heavy meromyosin (HMM) or S1 in the presence of F-actin. The actin peptide 1-28 bound to S1 and HMM and activated the ATPase activity in a manner similar to that of F-actin. These results demonstrate that the N-terminal region of actin, residues 1-28, contains a biologically important binding site for myosin.     

Rotational dynamics of spin-labeled F-actin in the sub-millisecond time range.

The rotational motions of F-actin filaments and myosin heads attached to them have been measured by saturation transfer electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy using spin-labels rigidly bound to actin, or to the myosin head region in intact myosin molecules, heavy meromyosin, and subfragment-1. The spin-label attached to F-actin undergoes rotational motion having an effective correlation time of the order of 10^?4 seconds. This cannot be interpreted as rotation of the entire F-actin filament or local rotation of the spin-label, but must represent an internal rotational mode of F-actin, possibly a bending or flexing motion, or a rotation of an actin monomer or a segment of it. The rate of this rotational motion is reduced approximately fourfold by myosin, HMM or S-1; HMM and S-1 are equally effective, on a molar basis, in slowing this rotation and both produce their maximal effect at a ratio of about one molecule of HMM or S-1 per ten actin monomers. With chymotryptic S-1, the effect is partially reversed at higher concentrations. With S-1 prepared with papain in the presence of Mg²⁺, the reversal is smaller, while with HMM or myosin there is no reversal at higher concentrations. Tropomyosin slightly decreases the actin rotational mobility, and the addition of HMM to the actin-tropomyosin complex produces a further slowing. The rotational correlation time for acto-HMM is the same whether the spin-label is on actin or HMM, indicating that the rotation of the head region of HMM when bound to F-actin is controlled by a mode of rotation within the F-actin filaments.     

Intermonomer cross-linking of F-actin alters the dynamics of its interaction with H-meromyosin in the weak-binding state

Previous cross-linking studies [Kim E, Bobkova E, Hegyi G, Muhlrad A & Reisler E (2002) Biochemistry 41, 86-93] have shown that site-specific cross-linking among F-actin monomers inhibits the motion and force generation of actomyosin. However, it does not change the steady-state ATPase parameters of actomyosin. These apparently contradictory findings have been attributed to the uncoupling of force generation from other processes of actomyosin interaction as a consequence of reduced flexibility at the interface between actin subdomains-1 and -2. In this study, we use EPR spectroscopy to investigate the effects of cross-linking constituent monomers upon the molecular dynamics of the F-actin complex. We show that cross-linking reduces the rotational mobility of an attached probe. It is consistent with the filaments becoming more rigid. Addition of heavy meromyosin (HMM) to the cross-linked filaments further restricts the rotational mobility of the probe. The effect of HMM on the actin filaments is highly cooperative: even a 1 : 10 molar ratio of HMM to actin strongly restricts the dynamics of the filaments. More interesting results are obtained when nucleotides are also added. In the presence of HMM and ADP, similar strongly reduced mobility of the probe was found than in a rigor state. In the presence of adenosine 5'[betagamma-imido] triphosphate (AMPPNP), a nonhydrolyzable analogue of ATP, weak binding of HMM to either cross-linked or native F-actin increases probe mobility. By contrast, weak binding by the HMM/ADP/AlF4 complex has different effects upon the two systems. This protein-nucleotide complex increases probe mobility in native actin filaments, as does HMM + AMPPNP. However, its addition to cross-linked filaments leaves probe mobility as constrained as in the rigor state. These findings suggest that the dynamic change upon weak binding by HMM/ADP/AlF4 which is inhibited by cross-linking is essential to the proper mechanical behaviour of the filaments during movement.     

Mapping of the functional domains in the amino-terminal region of calponin.

Three chymotryptic fragments accounting for almost the entire amino acid sequence of gizzard calponin (Takahashi, K., and Nadal-Ginard, B. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 13284-13288) were isolated and characterized. They encompass the segments of residues 7-144 (NH2-terminal 13-kDa peptide), 7-182 (NH2-terminal 22-kDa peptide), and 183-292 (COOH-terminal 13-kDa peptide). They arise from the sequential hydrolysis of the peptide bonds at Tyr182-Gly183 and Tyr144-Ala145 which were protected by the binding of F-actin to calponin. Only the NH2-terminal 13- and 22-kDa fragments were retained by immobilized Ca(2+)-calmodulin, but only the larger 22 kDa entity cosedimented with F-actin and inhibited, in the absence of Ca(2+)-calmodulin, the skeletal actomyosin subfragment-1 ATPase activity as the intact calponin. Since the latter peptide differs from the NH2-terminal 13-kDa fragment by a COOH-terminal 38-residue extension, this difference segment appears to contain the actin-binding domain of calponin. Zero-length cross-linked complexes of F-actin and either calponin or its 22-kDa peptide were produced. The total CNBr digest of the F-actin-calponin conjugate was fractionated over immobilized calmodulin. The EGTA-eluted pair of cross-linked actin-calponin peptides was composed of the COOH-terminal actin segment of residues 326-355 joined to the NH2-terminal calponin region of residues 52-168 which seems to contain the major determinants for F-actin and Ca(2+)-calmodulin binding.     

Both heads of tissue-derived smooth muscle heavy meromyosin bind to actin in the presence of ADP

The effect of ADP and phosphorylation upon the actin binding properties of heavy meromyosin was investigated using three fluorescence methods that monitor the number of heavy meromyosin heads that bind to pyrene-actin: (i) amplitudes of ATP-induced dissociation, (ii) amplitudes of ADP-induced dissociation of the pyrene-actin-heavy meromyosin complex, and (iii) amplitudes of the association of heavy meromyosin with pyrene-actin. Both heads bound to pyrene-actin, irrespective of regulatory light chain phosphorylation or the presence of ADP. This behavior was found for native regulated heavy meromyosin prepared by proteolytic digestion of chicken gizzard myosin with between 5 and 95% heavy chain cleavage at the actin-binding loop, showing that two-head binding is a property of heavy meromyosin with uncleaved heavy chains. These data are in contrast to a previous study using an uncleaved expressed preparation (Berger, C. E., Fagnant, P. M., Heizmann, S., Trybus, K. M., and Geeves, M. A. (2001) J. Biol. Chem. 276, 23240-23245), which showed that one head of the unphosphorylated heavy meromyosin-ADP complex bound to actin and that the partner head either did not bind or bound weakly. Possible explanations for the differences between the two studies are discussed. We have shown that unphosphorylated heavy meromyosin appears to adopt a special state in the presence of ADP based upon analysis of actin-heavy meromyosin association rate constants. Data were consistent with one head binding rapidly and the second head binding more slowly in the presence of ADP. Both heads bound to actin at the same rate for all other states.     

Crosslinking of trypsin digested acto-heavy meromyosin as a probe of the affinity of the two myosin heads to actin

The interaction of the two heads of the myosin molecule with actin was studied by tryptic digestion of HMM in the presence of actin, followed by crosslinking the two nicked heavy chains with Nbs2 at the S2 region. In view of the protection by actin of the 50/60 kDa junction against proteolysis, the percentage of the heads interacting with actin was estimated from the proportion of the 110 kDa to the 60 kDa digestion product. Under conditions such that about 50% of HMM heads were protected by actin (at an actin to HMM head molar ratio of 1:1 in the absence of nucleotide, or 3:1 in the presence of 5 mM ADP), the crosslinking of the digestion products yielded a 230 kDa (110 + 110 kDa), 125 kDa (60 + 60 kDa) and 175 kDa (60 + 110 kDa) species. Since the latter should be the only crosslinking product when only one head of HMM molecule is protected by actin, it is concluded that there is no preferential binding of one of the two HMM heads to actin in the presence of ADP or at equimolar actin to myosin heads ratio.     

Interhead distances in myosin attached to F-actin estimated by fluorescence energy transfer spectroscopy.

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) spectroscopy has been used to determine distances between probes attached to the most reactive sulfhydryl (SH1) group on individual myosin "heads." We measured intramolecular and intermolecular interhead distances as well as the distance between one head of heavy meromyosin (HMM) mixed with subfragment-1 (S1) heads attached to F-actin under rigor conditions. The SH1 cysteine was specifically labeled with either a donor (5-((((2-iodoacetyl)amino)ethyl)amino)naphthalene-1-sulfonic acid) or an acceptor probe (5-iodoacetamidofluorescein). In free solution, the distance between these probes was too large to allow significant FRET, but in the rigor complex with F-actin, intermolecular interhead distances between S1 molecules, HMM molecules, or S1 and HMM were determined to be 6.0-6.3 nm. The radial coordinate of the labels relative to F-actin was 5.0-6.4 nm. However, the intramolecular interhead distance in HMMs in which the two heads were labeled with D and A probes was estimated to be larger. The binding affinity of the second head of HMM(D/A) to F-actin may be reduced because of heterogeneous modification of the SH1 groups, such that the probability of single-head binding is increased.     

Heavy meromyosin binds actin with negative cooperativity.

The association of fluorescently labeled heavy meromyosin (HMM) and F-actin was measured by time-resolved fluorescence depolarization. The effects of varying the protein concentrations, temperature, KCl concentration, and pH were determined. Measurements of HMM mobility supported a model of no interaction between the two heads in the absence of actin. Measurements of actin binding, when compared with results for myosin subfragment I, indicated that the two heads of HMM do not bind independently in the rigor complex. This could result from actin-transmitted negative cooperativity or from steric inhibition due to the structure of HMM. For HMM and actin in 0.15 7 kcl at 25 degrees C: Ka = 3.9 X 10(7) M-1, deltaHco' = 36 +/- 2 J M-1, deltaSco' = 0.26 +/- 0.02 kJ M-1 K-1; the slope of ln Ka vs. [KCl]1/2 = -3.88 and the pH of maximum association was 6.9.     

Bundling of actin filaments by alpha-actinin depends on its molecular length

Cross-linking of actin filaments (F-actin) into bundles and networks was investigated with three different isoforms of the dumbbell-shaped alpha-actinin homodimer under identical reaction conditions. These were isolated from chicken gizzard smooth muscle, Acanthamoeba, and Dictyostelium, respectively. Examination in the electron microscope revealed that each isoform was able to cross-link F-actin into networks. In addition, F-actin bundles were obtained with chicken gizzard and Acanthamoeba alpha-actinin, but not Dictyostelium alpha-actinin under conditions where actin by itself polymerized into disperse filaments. This F-actin bundle formation critically depended on the proper molar ratio of alpha-actinin to actin, and hence F-actin bundles immediately disappeared when free alpha-actinin was withdrawn from the surrounding medium. The apparent dissociation constants (Kds) at half-saturation of the actin binding sites were 0.4 microM at 22 degrees C and 1.2 microM at 37 degrees C for chicken gizzard, and 2.7 microM at 22 degrees C for both Acanthamoeba and Dictyostelium alpha-actinin. Chicken gizzard and Dictyostelium alpha-actinin predominantly cross-linked actin filaments in an antiparallel fashion, whereas Acanthamoeba alpha-actinin cross-linked actin filaments preferentially in a parallel fashion. The average molecular length of free alpha-actinin was 37 nm for glycerol-sprayed/rotary metal-shadowed and 35 nm for negatively stained chicken gizzard; 46 and 44 nm, respectively, for Acanthamoeba; and 34 and 31 nm, respectively, for Dictyostelium alpha-actinin. In negatively stained preparations we also evaluated the average molecular length of alpha-actinin when bound to actin filaments: 36 nm for chicken gizzard and 35 nm for Acanthamoeba alpha-actinin, a molecular length roughly coinciding with the crossover repeat of the two-stranded F-actin helix (i.e., 36 nm), but only 28 nm for Dictyostelium alpha-actinin. Furthermore, the minimal spacing between cross-linking alpha-actinin molecules along actin filaments was close to 36 nm for both smooth muscle and Acanthamoeba alpha-actinin, but only 31 nm for Dictyostelium alpha-actinin. This observation suggests that the molecular length of the alpha-actinin homodimer may determine its spacing along the actin filament, and hence F-actin bundle formation may require "tight" (i.e., one molecule after the other) and "untwisted" (i.e., the long axis of the molecule being parallel to the actin filament axis) packing of alpha-actinin molecules along the actin filaments.     

Microcalorimetric measurement of the enthalpy of binding of rabbit skeletal myosin subfragment 1 and heavy meromyosin to F-actin

The heat of binding of rabbit skeletal myosin subfragment 1 (myosin-S1) and heavy meromyosin (HMM) to F-actin has been measured by batch calorimetry. Proton release measurements in unbuffered solutions indicate that less than 0.1 mol of protons is absorbed or released per mol of myosin head bound to actin. Hence, the measured heats are approximately equal to the enthalpy of myosin-S1 and HMM binding to actin. The enthalpy of binding of myosin-S1 to actin was +22 +/- 3 and +27 +/- 5 kJ/mol of myosin-S1 in two series of experiments at 12 degrees C and +26 +/- 5 kJ/mol of myosin-S1 at 0 degrees C, indicating that delta Cp for this reaction in the range of 0-12 degrees C is small (-80 J/mol/K). The enthalpy of binding of HMM to actin at 12 degrees C was found to be +26 +/- 1 kJ/mol of myosin head. The enthalpies determined here and the equilibrium constants obtained from the literature for measurements at 20 degrees C under identical solvent conditions were used to estimate the entropy of the association of myosin S1 and HMM with F-actin: +235 J/mol/K for myosin-S1 and +190 J/mol of myosin head/K for HMM. Thermodynamic parameters of the interaction of myosin-S1 with actin and ADP or AMP-PNP can be evaluated using the enthalpy of association of myosin-S1 with actin determined here, together with literature values for the equilibrium constants and enthalpies of binding of these nucleotides to myosin-S1. The calculated enthalpies of binding of ADP or AMP-PNP to actomyosin-S1 are small and negative.     

An EPR study of the rotational dynamics of actins from striated and smooth muscle and their complexes with heavy meromyosin

The rotational motions of the actin from rabbit skeletal muscle and from chicken gizzard smooth muscle were measured by conventional and saturation transfer electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy using maleimide spin-label rigidly bound at Cys-374. The conventional EPR spectra indicate a slight difference in the polarity of the environment of the label and in the rotational mobility of the monomeric gizzard actin compared to its skeletal muscle counterpart. These differences disappear upon polymerization. The EPR spectra of the two actins in their F form and in their complexes with heavy meromyosin (HMM) did not reveal any difference in the rotational dynamic properties that might be correlated with the known differences in the activation of myosin ATPase activity by smooth and skeletal muscle actin. Our results agree with earlier EPR studies on skeletal muscle actin in showing that polymerization stops the nanosecond rotational motion of actin monomers and that F-actin undergoes rotational motion having an effective correlation time of the order of 0.1 ms. However, our measurements show that complete elimination of the nanosecond motions requires prolonged incubation of F-actin, suggesting that the slow formation of interfilamental cross-links in concentrated F-actin solutions contributes to this process. We have also used the EPR spectroscopy to study the interaction between HMM and actin in the F and G form. Our results show that in the absence of salt one HMM molecule can cooperatively interact with eight monomers to produce a polymer which closely resembles F-actin in its rotational mobility but differs from the complex of F-actin with HMM. The results indicate that salt is necessary for further slowing down, in a cooperative manner, the sub-millisecond internal motion in actin polymer and for a non-cooperative change in the intramonomer conformation around Cys-374 on the binding of HMM.