Unraveling linker histone interactions in nucleosomes

Considerable progress has been made recently in defining the interactions of linker histones (H1s) within nucleosomes. Major advancements include atomic resolution structures of the globular domain of full-length H1s in the context of nucleosomes containing full-length linker DNA. Although these studies have led to a detailed understanding of the interactions and dynamics of H1 globular domains in the canonical on-dyad nucleosome binding pocket, more information regarding the intrinsically disordered N-terminal and C-terminal domains is needed. In this review, we highlight studies supporting our current understanding of the structures and interactions of the N-terminal, globular, and C-terminal domains of linker histones within the nucleosome.     

Simulations of SIN mutations and histone variants in human nucleosomes reveal altered protein-DNA and core histone interactions

Alterations in the stability of a nucleosome exert predominant influence on chromatin structure and eukaryotic gene expression. In an attempt to investigate the mononucleosome stability using computational approaches, we have simulated the structure of a human mononucleosome and have compared their energies under the influence of core mutations, tail substitutions, variant histones, and orthologs. We observe that mutant nucleosomes carrying SIN (SWI Independent) mutations do not alter the overall nucleosomal structure but cause local structural changes leading to significant changes in energy and hence the stability. We observe that the nucleosome stability is altered by the substitution of only certain critical lysine residues on the H3 tails. Interestingly, the incorporation of variants H2A.Z and H3.3 lower nucleosome stability as evidenced by small energy changes. However, the substitution of histone orthologs did not alter structural stability. Our simulations to determine the nucleosome stability using energy trends emphasize the role of mutations, variants, and orthologs as determinants of chromatin structure at the nucleosome core particle level. The destabilization we observe on the human nucleosome with core mutations show similar trends of instability as validated experimentally in yeast.     

Availability of hyperacetylated H4 histone in intact nucleosomes to specific antibodies

Specific antibodies against the tetra-acetylated form of H4 histone have been elicited in the rabbit. They do not cross-react with the non-, mono-, and di-acetylated forms of the histone molecule but a slight cross-reactivity with the tri-acetylated form of H4 histone is observed. Our studies also show that hyperacetylated H4 histones are recognized by the antibodies in intact nucleosomes.     

Reassociation of histone H1 with nucleosomes.

The role of histone H1 in nucleosome heterogeneity and structure has been studied using a reconstitution procedure. Histone H1 and non-histone proteins are removed selectively from enzymatically fragmented chromatin by Dowex 50W-X2 treatment. The resulting "stripped" chromatin then is reassociated with purified histone H1 using step gradient dialysis. Material reconstituted in this manner was examined by gel electrophoresis, protein cross-linking, and chromatin fingerprinting. The results demonstrate that the histone H1 molecule efficiently binds to nucleosomes with fidelity in an apparent noncooperative manner. Polynucleosomes possess two specific binding sites for histone H1 per histone octamer; the first binding site is of higher affinity than the second. The 160-base pair nuclease digestion barrier and nucleosome electrophoretic class (MIII)n are established upon binding the 1st histone H1 molecule. Upon binding the 2nd histone H1 molecule, polynucleosomes assume a highly compact conformation. The experimental approach introduced here should permit determining whether nucleosomes possess independent specific binding sites for other chromosomal proteins, and should allow reconstitution of the other electrophoretic forms of nucleosomes which we have described previously.     

Absence of histone H2B in nucleosomes containing histone TH2B and interaction of immunoglobulin with nucleosomes

Nucleosomes containing histone TH2B were isolated from chromatin subunits of rat testis nuclei (MNT) by incubating with anti-TH2B immunoglobulin (IgTH2B) which was covalently attached to agarose gels. Electrophoretic separation of histones of these isolated nucleosomes revealed that histone H2B was completely absent, suggesting that histone TH2B, the variant of H2B, existed in nucleosomes only as TH2B X TH2B and that TH2B X H2B was not likely to exist in chromatin. Sucrose gradient ultracentrifugation of mixtures of MNT and IgTH2B revealed that when excess amounts of immunologically active IgTH2B were present, complexes of higher sedimentation coefficients than MNT X IgTH2B were formed, but with limited amounts of active IgTH2B, only MNT X IgTH2B was formed. When purified IgTH2B was coated on polystyrene tubes and incubated with MNT, those MNT immobilized by the tube-coated IgTH2B adsorbed IgTH2B from diluted antiserum during subsequent incubation. Those results suggested the absence of steric hindrance in the binding of IgTH2B to MNT X IgTH2B. When MNT was coated on polystyrene tubes and incubated with DNase and then with dilute anti-TH2B antiserum, it was found that DNase digestion increased the binding of immunoglobulin to the tubes approximately 76%. Interaction of chromatin subunits of rat liver nuclei (MNL) with anti-TH2B antiserum was negligible, but DNase digestion of MNL coated on tubes was followed by considerable interaction with anti-TH2B antiserum. Those results indicated DNase unmasked at least part of the determinants encased by DNA. Anti-H2B immunoglobulin (IgH2B) interacted with histone H2B and TH2B to the same extent, and interacted significantly to a lesser extent with either MNT or MNL. DNase digestion of MNT and MNL increased binding of IgH2B approximately 170 and 117%, respectively.     

H3.H4 tetramer directs DNA and core histone octamer assembly in the nucleosome core particle.

The way in which histones interact with DNA during in vitro assembly of nucleohistone has been examined. Chicken erythrocyte core histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 and lambdaDNA in 2 M NaCl were allowed to interact by stepwise decrease in the salt concentration. Binding, although weak, was first observed at 1.4 M NaCl and was essentially completed at 0.6 M NaCl. Analysis of the DNA-bound histones revealed that each of the histones in the pairs H2A,H2B and H3,H4 was always present in equimolar amounts and that the relative proportion of each pair was constant between 1.4 and 0.8 M NaCl. Evidence is presented suggesting that binding occurred via complexes of the four histones, the nature of which is likely to reflect the equilibrium among the octamer and its products of dissociation (Ruiz-Carrillo, A., & Jorcano, J.L. (1979) Biochemistry (preceding paper in this issue)). The presence of complexes of the four core histones is, however not required for the correct assembly of the nucleosome core particle. Nucleohistones obtained by adding at progressively lower ionic strengths the dimer H2A.H2B to the H3.H4-DNA complex (split reconstitutions) had the same characteristics as those assembled with the core histone complexes.     

Structural dynamics of nucleosome core particle: comparison with nucleosomes containing histone variants

The present study provides insights on the dominant mechanisms of motions of the nucleosome core particle and the changes in its functional dynamics in response to histone variants. Comparative analysis of the global dynamics of nucleosomes with native and variant H2A histones, using normal mode analysis revealed that the dynamics of the nucleosome is highly symmetric, and its interaction with the nucleosomal DNA plays a vital role in its regulation. The collective dynamics of nucleosomes are predicted to be dominated by two types of large-scale motions: (1) a global stretching-compression of nucleosome along the dyad axis by which the nucleosome undergoes a breathing motion with a massive distortion of nucleosomal DNA, modulated by histone-DNA interactions; and (2) the flipping (or bending) of both the sides of the nucleosome in an out-of-plane fashion with respect to the dyad axis, originated by the highly dynamic N-termini of H3 and (H2A.Z-H2B) dimer in agreement with the experimentally observed perturbed dynamics of the particular N-terminus under physiological conditions. In general, the nucleosomes with variant histones exhibit higher mobilities and weaker correlations between internal motions compared to the nucleosome containing ordinary histones. The differences are more pronounced at the L1 and L2 loops of the respective monomers H2B and H2A, and at the N-termini of the monomers H3 and H4, all of which closely interact with the wrapping DNA.     

The roles of H1, the histone core and DNA length in the unfolding of nucleosomes at low ionic strength.

Calf thymus nucleosomes exhibit two different and independent hydrodynamic responses to diminishing salt concentration. One change is gradual over the range 40 to 0.2 mM Na+ and is accompanied by decreases in contact-site cross-linking efficiency. The other change is abrupt, being centered between 1 and 2 mM Na+. We found only one abrupt change in sedimentation rate for particles ranging in DNA content fom 144 to 230 base pairs. This response to decreasing ionic strength is similar for particles of both 169 and 230 base pairs. Core particles (144 base pairs) exhibit a somewhat diminished response. The abrupt change is blocked by formaldehyde or dimethylsuberimidate cross-linking. The blockage by dimethylsuberimidate demonstrates that the abrupt conformational change requires the participation of the core histones. H1 completely blocks the abrupt but not the gradual conformational change. Thus H1 uncouples the different responses to low ionic strength and exerts an important constraint on the conformational states available to the nucleosome core.     

The role of histone H1 and non-structured domains of core histones in maintaining the orientation of nucleosomes within the chromatin fiber

Calf thymus chromatin was digested with trypsin and the structural alterations which occurred were followed by flow linear dichroism. After a sharp initial increase, the amplitude of the positive signal gradually decreased followed by a change of the sign of the dichroism and further increase of the negative signal up to a plateau. These changes of the dichroism were compared to the respective changes in the histone pattern. It was shown that the positive dichroism of chromatin did not depend on the condensation state of chromatin, and that the orientation of the nucleosomes along the chromatin fiber was maintained by the globular domain of H1 and the non-structured parts of core histones.     

Selective removal of histone H1 from nucleosomes at low ionic strength

The method for removal of histone H 1 from chromatin by treatment with ion-exchange resin AG 50 WX 2 in the presence of 100 mM NaCl and 50 mM phosphate buffer (Thoma and Koller, 1977, Cell, 12, 101–107) results in production not only of H1-depleted chromatin but also free DNA. We have now modified this procedure so that the nucleosome is treated with the cation exchange resin in two steps, first in 50 mM sodium phosphate buffer and then in 50 mM sodium phosphate and 50 mM NaCl whereby histone H 1 is selectively removed without a release of free DNA at low resin concentrations.Abbreviations NaP Sodium phosphate buffer of molarities and pH as stated in the text - SDS Sodium dodecyl sulfate     

Influence of histone tails and H4 tail acetylations on nucleosome-nucleosome interactions

Nucleosome–nucleosome interaction plays a fundamental role in chromatin folding and self-association. The cation-induced condensation of nucleosome core particles (NCPs) displays properties similar to those of chromatin fibers, with important contributions from the N-terminal histone tails. We study the self-association induced by addition of cations [Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺, cobalt(III)hexammine³⁺, spermidine³⁺ and spermine⁴⁺] for NCPs reconstituted with wild-type unmodified histones and with globular tailless histones and for NCPs with the H4 histone tail having lysine (K) acetylations or lysine-to-glutamine mutations at positions K5, K8, K12 and K16. In addition, the histone construct with the single H4K16 acetylation was investigated. Acetylated histones were prepared by a semisynthetic native chemical ligation method. The aggregation behavior of NCPs shows a general cation-dependent behavior similar to that of the self-association of nucleosome arrays. Unlike nucleosome array self-association, NCP aggregation is sensitive to position and nature of the H4 tail modification. The tetra-acetylation in the H4 tail significantly weakens the nucleosome–nucleosome interaction, while the H4 K → Q tetra-mutation displays a more modest effect. The single H4K16 acetylation also weakens the self-association of NCPs, which reflects the specific role of H4K16 in the nucleosome–nucleosome stacking. Tailless NCPs can aggregate in the presence of oligocations, which indicates that attraction also occurs by tail-independent nucleosome–nucleosome stacking and DNA–DNA attraction in the presence of cations. The experimental data were compared with the results of coarse-grained computer modeling for NCP solutions with explicit presence of mobile ions.     

Structures and interactions of the core histone tail domains

The core histone tail domains are "master control switches" that help define the structural and functional characteristics of chromatin at many levels. The tails modulate DNA accessibility within the nucleosome, are essential for stable folding of oligonucleosome arrays into condensed chromatin fibers, and are important for fiber-fiber interactions involved in higher order structures. Many nuclear signaling pathways impinge upon the tail domains, resulting in posttranslational modifications that are likely to alter the charge, structure, and/or interactions of the core histone tails or to serve as targets for the binding of ancillary proteins or other enzymatic functions. However, currently we have only a marginal understanding of the molecular details of core histone tail conformations and contacts. Here we review data related to the structures and interactions of the core histone tail domains and how these domains and posttranslational modifications therein may define the structure and function of chromatin.