Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. V. Induction of tolerance with DNP compounds and with free and membrane-associated DNFB.

Immunologic unresponsiveness (tolerance) was induced in a mouse model of contact sensitization to DNFB. The ability to induce tolerance varied with the chemical reactivity of the tolerogen; DNFB was highly tolerogenic, DNBSO3 was moderately tolerogenic, and DNP-lysine was not tolerogenic. Although DNFB is considered a highly reactive compound, tracer studies of injected DNFB showed that it was rapidly excreted. Further studies were therefore done with DNFB attached to mouse erythrocytes. Tolerance to DNFB-RBC was highly specific in vivo; mice tolerant to DNFB showed normal reactivity to TNCB (picryl chloride.) Cells of mice tolerant to DNFB-RBC were also unresponsive to DNBSO3 in vitro. Tolerance to DNFB, DNBSO3, and DNFB-RBC all required time to develop, suggesting that an active process was involved.     

Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. VI. Inhibition of afferent sensitivity by suppressor T cells in adoptive tolerance.

Tolerance in contact sensitivity to DNFB can be adoptively transferred to normal mice with lymph node cells from tolerant donors. This tolerance is antigen specific and is mediated by T cells, i.e., "suppressor" T cells. Experiments were carried out to investigate the mechanism(s) by which the suppressor T cells induce tolerance to DNFB contact sensitivity. The suppressor cells were effective only if they were present during the early stages of the afferent limb of sensitization. As measured by DNA synthesis, cell proliferation in the draining lymph nodes of recipients of suppressor cells was found to be significantly less than in control animals indicating that the suppressor cells acted, at least in part, by limiting or inhibiting DNFB-induced cell proliferation. This inhibition was shown to be antigen specific since the DNFB suppressor cells did not inhibit cell proliferation induced by oxazolone, an unrelated contact sensitizer. The ability to DNFB tolerant cells to block afferent sensitization pathways differs from the mechanism of tolerance to picryl chloride, reported by others, where efferent pathways are blocked.     

IL-12 breaks dinitrothiocyanobenzene (DNTB)-mediated tolerance and converts the tolerogen DNTB into an immunogen

Epicutaneous application of dinitrothiocyanobenzene (DNTB) induces tolerance against its related compound dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB), because DNTB-pretreated mice cannot be sensitized against the potent hapten DNFB. This tolerance is hapten-specific and transferable. In this study, we demonstrate that IL-12 can break DNTB-mediated tolerance. Furthermore, naive mice treated with IL-12 before DNTB application responded to DNFB challenge with a pronounced ear swelling response without previous sensitization to DNFB, showing that IL-12 can convert the tolerogen DNTB into an immunogen. No differences in numbers or regulatory activity were observed between CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells isolated from mice treated with DNFB, DNTB, or IL-12 followed by DNTB. However, the number of CD207+ Langerhans cells in regional lymph nodes of DNTB-treated mice was significantly lower than in animals treated with DNFB or IL-12 plus DNTB. Additionally, CD11c+ dendritic cells (DC) isolated from regional lymph nodes of DNTB-treated mice had a significantly lower ability to stimulate T cell proliferation and produced reduced amounts of inflammatory cytokines. Application of both DNFB and DNTB induced apoptotic cell death of DC in the epidermis and the regional lymph nodes. However, the number of apoptotic DC in regional lymph nodes was significantly higher in DNTB-treated animals compared with mice treated with DNFB or IL-12 plus DNTB. Therefore, we conclude that DNTB-mediated tolerance is secondary to inefficient Ag presentation as a result of apoptotic cell death of DC and that IL-12 converts the tolerogen DNTB into an immunogen by preventing DNTB-induced apoptosis of DC.     

Prevention by the MER tubercle bacillus fraction of immunosuppression induced by cancer chemotherapeutic agents

Summary Contact hypersensitivity (CH) to 2,4 dinitro-1-fluorobenzene (DNFB) was induced in BALB/c mice by DNFB skin application. Development of skin CH was suppressed by exposure of the animals after sensitization to the cancer chemotherapeutic drugs cyclophosphamide (CY), sodium methotrexate (MTX), and 5-fluorouracil (5FU). Unresponsiveness to DNFB was also induced in parallel experiments by a single intravenous injection of dinitrobenzenesulfonate (DNBS), either before or concomitant with sensitization. Potentiation of CH skin reactivity was achieved by administration of CY prior to sensitization.Pretreatment by two injections of the methanol extraction residue (MER) tubercle bacillus fraction restored significantly the ability of animals exposed to CY, MTX, or 5FU to respond to DNFB sensitization. The agent did not impair the potentiation of CH skin reactivity that could be effected by administration of CY prior to sensitization.MER treatment was not effective in reversing hapten-induced (DNBS) tolerance in mice.These findings favor the assumption that MER, under the conditions tested, stimulates the function of positively reacting T cells and exerts no enhancing or protective action on suppressor T cells.     

The induction of tolerance to DNFB contact sensitivity by using hapten-modified lymphoid cells. III. Effects of hapten concentration on the ability of MLS-disparate cells to induce rapid unresponsiveness

We investigated genetic restrictions in the induction of immediate tolerance to DNFB contact sensitivity in mice. Using spleen cells from various donor strains haptenated at 500 micro M DNFB, we were unable to detect any restrictions in tolerance induction in recipients that were either syngeneic or allogeneic to the donor strain. However, if the concentration of hapten used in the in vitro labeling was decreased (from 500 micro M to 2.5 to 5 micro M DNFB), differences in tolerogenesis between the various donor strain haplotypes were found. Haptenated spleen cells labeled with 5 micro M DNFB produced a profound level of unresponsiveness in allogeneic recipients but produced minimal tolerance in syngeneic animals. This tolerant state was shown to be antigen-specific and was not produced by unmodified allogeneic cells alone. Further genetic analysis demonstrated that an efficient tolerant state was produced when the donor of the tolerogen and recipient differed at the MLS locus rather than at either the MHC or minor regions. This phenomenon required viable, Thy 1-bearing cells in the haptenated donor population for efficient tolerogenesis to DNFB contact sensitivity.     

Tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. VII. Functional demonstration of cell-associated tolerogen in lymph node cell populations containing specific suppressor cells.

Adoptive tolerance to contact sensitivity to DNFB is mediated by suppressor T cells. These cells are induced by iv injection of the hapten DNB-SO₃. Experiments were carried out to investigate the question of simultaneous transfer of tolerogen (DNB-SO₃ or its conjugation product DNP) with the suppressor cells. The results showed that tolerant lymph node cells pretreated in vitro with anti-TNP serum before transfer were unable to induce unresponsiveness to DNFB. Tolerant cells treated with either anti-TNP serum which had been passed over a TNP-affinity column or with polyvalent anti-immunoglobul in serum were not inhibited. These results functionally demonstrate that LN cell populations containing DNFB suppressor cells have accessible hapten (e.g., DNP) associated with their membrane, which is necessary for induction of adoptive tolerance. The hapten (tolerogen) appears to be bound directly to the cell surface rather than as an immune complex.     

Immune responses in mice infected with lactic dehydrogenase virus. II. Contact sensitization to DNFB and characterization of lymphoid cells during acute LDV infection.

The effect of acute infection with lactic dehydrogenase virus (LDV) on the development of contact sensitivity to DNFB was studied in Balb/c mice. LDV infection inhibited contact sensitivity to DNFB. The extent of inhibition observed depended on the timing of LDV infection relative to the first (sensitization) and last (challenge) antigenic stimulation. The possibility that the observed inhibition of contact sensitivity to DNFB could be due to a depletion of the T-dependent areas of lymphoid tissues during acute LDV infection was considered. Lymph nodes, spleen and thymus from normal animals, and from mice infected with LDV 1 or 2 days previously, were examined histologically. Also, the proportion of T cells to Ig positive cells in cell suspensions of these tissues was determined. Results did not suggest a T cell depletion during acute infection with LDV.     

A splenic requirement for the generation of suppressor T cells.

Tolerance to contact sensitization with DNFB may be induced by DNBSO3. This specific unresponsiveness may occur via one or both of two mechanisms--production of suppressor T cells or clone inhibition. We investigated the role of the spleen in this unresponsiveness. Splenectomized mice may be tolerized by i.v. injection of DNBSO3, but they are incapable of serving as donors of lymph node cells for transfer of tolerance to normal recipients. Kinetic studies indicated that the spleen must be present at least three days after tolerization in order to permit development of a significant number of suppressor cells in the peripheral lymph nodes. We interpret these results to indicate that 1) clone inhibition does not require the spleen, 2) the generation of suppressor T cells is dependent on the presence of the spleen, and 3) it is likely that tolerogens in this system induce suppressor cells in the spleen and some of these cells or their products leave the spleen to reach the peripheral lymph nodes.     

Evidence for functional relevance of CTLA-4 in ultraviolet-radiation-induced tolerance

Hapten sensitization through UV-exposed skin induces hapten-specific tolerance that can be adoptively transferred by injecting T lymphocytes into naive recipients. The exact phenotype of T cells responsible for inhibiting the immune response and their mode of action remain unclear. Evidence exists that CTLA-4 negatively regulates T cell activation. We addressed whether CTLA-4 is involved in the transfer of UV-induced tolerance. Injection of lymph node cells from mice that were sensitized with dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) through UV-irradiated skin inhibited induction of contact hypersensitivity against DNFB in the recipient animals. When CTLA-4+ cells were depleted, transfer of suppression was lost. Likewise, significantly fewer lymphocytes enriched for CTLA-4+ cells were necessary to transfer suppression than unfractionated cells. Expression of CTLA-4 appears to be functionally relevant, since in vivo injection of a blocking anti-CTLA-4 Ab was able to break UV-induced tolerance and inhibited transfer of suppression. Upon stimulation with dendritic cells in the presence of the water-soluble DNFB analogue, DNBS, CTLA-4+ T cells from DNFB-tolerized mice secreted high levels of IL-10, TGF-beta, and IFN-gamma; low levels of IL-2; and no IL-4, resembling the cytokine pattern of T regulatory 1 cells. Ab blocking of CTLA-4 resulted in inhibition of IL-10 release. Accordingly, transfer of tolerance was not observed when recipients were treated with an anti-IL-10 Ab. Hence we propose that T cells, possibly of the T regulatory 1 type, transfer UV-mediated suppression through the release of IL-10. Activation of CTLA-4 appears to be important in this process.     

Prevention by the MER tubercle bacillus fraction of immunosuppression induced by cancer chemotherapeutic agents

Summary Contact hypersensitivity (CH) to 2,4-dinitro-1-fluorobenzene (DNFB) was induced in guinea pigs and mice by DNFB skin application. Development of CH was suppressed in both species either by cyclophosphamide (CY) treatment after sensitization or by single intravenous injection of dinitrobenzene-sulfonate (DNBS) before sensitization (hapten-induced tolerance). Additional treatment schedules were employed in guinea pigs, with the following results: Suppression of CH by injection of DNBS concomitant with sensitization; abrogation of hapten-induced tolerance by administration of CY before sensitization; and potentiation of CH skin reactivity by administration of CY before sensitization.Pretreatment by two injections of the methanol extraction residue (MER) tubercle bacillus fraction restored significantly the ability of CY treated animals to respond to DNFB sensitization. In contrast, administration of MER either by one injection before sensitization, concomitant with DNFB, or after sensitization did not prevent immunosuppression by CY.MER treatment was not effective in reversing hapten-induced tolerance in mice, and had only an occasional effect on this process in guinea pigs. Abrogation of hapten-induced tolerance and potentiation of DNFB sensitization by CY in guinea pigs were also not influenced by MER treatment.Supported by Contract NO1-CM-12127 from the NCI and by research grants from Concern Foundation, Inc., the Lautenberg Endowment, the National Council for Research and Development, Israel, and the GSF Munich, Germany, and the Leukemia Research Foundation, Inc.     

CD4+ and CD8+ T cell priming for contact hypersensitivity occurs independently of CD40-CD154 interactions

The primary effector cells of contact hypersensitivity (CHS) responses to dintrofluorobenzene (DNFB) are IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cells, whereas CD4(+) T cells regulate the magnitude and duration of the response. The requirement for CD40-CD154 engagement during CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cell priming by hapten-presenting Langerhans cells (hpLC) is undefined and was tested in the current study. Similar CHS responses to DNFB were elicited in wild-type and CD154(-/-) animals. DNFB sensitization of CD154(-/-) mice primed IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cells and IL-4-producing CD4(+) T cells. However, anti-CD154 mAb MR1 given during hapten sensitization inhibited hapten-specific CD8(+), but not CD4(+), T cell development and the CHS response to challenge. F(ab')(2) of MR1 failed to inhibit CD8(+) T cell development and the CHS response suggesting that the mechanism of inhibition is distinct from that of CD40-CD154 blockade. Furthermore, anti-CD154 mAb did not inhibit CD8(+) T cell development and CHS responses in mice depleted of CD4(+) T cells or in CD4(-/-) mice. During in vitro proliferation assays, hpLC from mice treated with anti-CD154 mAb during DNFB sensitization were less stimulatory for hapten-primed T cells than hpLC from either control mice or mice depleted of CD4(+) T cells before anti-CD154 mAb administration. These results demonstrate that development of IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cells and the CHS response are not dependent on CD40-CD154 interactions. This study proposes a novel mechanism of anti-CD154 mAb-mediated inhibition of CD8(+) T cell development where anti-CD154 mAb acts indirectly through CD4(+) T cells to impair the ability of hpLC to prime CD8(+) T cells.     

Suppressor cells for the afferent phase of contact sensitivity to picryl chloride: inhibition of DNA synthesis induced by T cells from mice injected with picryl sulfonic acid.

Previous reports have shown that picryl sulfonic acid (PSA) induces suppressor T cells that inhibit the effector phase of contact sensitivity, whereeas its DNP counterpart, dinitrobenzenesulfonate (DNBS) induces cells that inhibit the afferent phase of sensitization. Accordingly, cells from mice injected with DNBS, but not PSA, could be shown to inhibit the DNA synthesis in the lymph nodes that occurs during sensitization. It is now shown that PSA does induce T cells that suppress DNA synthesis but this can only be detected with enriched T cells or by using a regimen of PSA injection different frm previously used to induce suppressor cells for the effector phase. The T cells did not affect responses to oxazolone or dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) and were distinguishable from suppressors of the efferent phase in that they could be produced in adult thymectomized but not cyclophosphamide-treated mice. T cells from mice injected with DNBS that inhibited DNA synthesis to DNFB had the same properties.     

Specific suppressor T cells in rats active in the afferent phase of contact hypersensitivity

The optimal conditions for the induction of contact hypersensitivity in rats and the characteristics of its suppression were studied using the sensitizing haptens dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) and trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB). The hypersensitivity was shown to be hapten specific in so far as TNCB did not sensitize for DNFB responses but sensitization with DNFB did allow a marginal response in rats challenged with TNCB. Suppression of the sensitization to DNFB and TNCB could be generated by intravenous injection of dinitrobenzenesulphonic acid (DNBS) or trinitrobenzenesulphonic acid (TNBS), respectively, up to 3 weeks before sensitization. This suppression was hapten specific and could be transferred with splenic T cells enriched for lymphocytes carrying the OX8 (Tc/s) cell marker. Only the induction phase of sensitization, however, could be suppressed in that way. No suppression acting upon the effector phase could be detected except for a nonspecific local suppression at the site of a previous challenge with an antigen to which the rat was specifically suppressed. This study shows that suppression of contact hypersensitivity in rats is mediated by specific suppressor T cells of which the activation pathway apparently differs from that postulated for mice.     

Desensitization of contact allergy to DNFB in mice. I. Description of a model system

We investigated the down-regulation of contact sensitivity (desensitization) in mice sensitized to DNFB. Mice were sensitized with DNFB, desensitized with antigen 2 wk later, and resensitized 2 wk after desensitization. Large doses of antigen (DNFB or DNBSO3) produced about 50% inhibition of the anamnestic response as measured by ear swelling after challenge with DNFB. Desensitization was antigen specific and long lasting. Lymph node cells from desensitized mice showed diminished antigen-induced proliferation in vitro. Although the anamnestic response can be inhibited by afferent- or efferent-acting suppressor cells, such suppressor cells were not demonstrated in desensitized animals. The most likely explanation is that antigen desensitizes by inactivating effector cells for contact sensitivity, although suppressor mechanisms have not been completely excluded.     

Soluble factors in tolerance and contact sensitivity to DNFB in mice. VII. Characterization of a monoclonal, efferent-acting suppressor factor with specificity for DNP/H-2Kd

To study further soluble factors which regulate contact sensitivity (CS) to 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB), hapten-primed spleen cells from BALB/c mice were used to make T-cell hybridomas. A hybrid constitutively producing a suppressor factor was identified and cloned (clone 3-10). Incubation of BALB/c DNFB immune lymph node cells (LNC) in the 3-10 supernatant suppressed the ability of the immune cells to transfer CS to DNFB. The passive transfer of CS to oxazalone or to 2,4,6-trinitrochlorobenzene (TNCB) was not suppressed by the 3-10 factor. The hapten specificity of the 3-10 factor further was demonstrated by the ability of DNFB immune LNC but not LNC from unsensitized or from TNCB-sensitized mice to absorb the factor. The 3-10 factor also was adsorbed by DNFB-immune LNC from mice that were syngeneic with BALB/c mice at the K locus of the MHC (e.g., B10.D2 and D2.GD). Pretreatment of DNFB-immune LNC with monoclonal anti-Kd antibody or with anti-DNP antibodies blocked the ability to adsorb the factor. These results indicated that the 3-10 suppressor factor binds to DNP/H-2Kd complexes on immune LNC. Nylon wool-purified T cells (83% Thy-1.2+) from DNFB-immune LNC were able to adsorb the factor as well as unseparated immune LNC. Furthermore, treatment of immune LNC with anti-Thy-1.2 plus C' abrogated the ability of the cells to adsorb the factor, indicating that the cellular target of the 3-10 factor is a T cell. In addition, treatment of the immune LNC with an autoantiidiotypic antiserum (CS 231) plus C', which depletes DNP-specific delayed-type hypersensitivity effector T (TDH) cells, also abrogated the ability of the cells to adsorb the factor. Finally, the suppressor factor was adsorbed and eluted from DNP affinity columns but was not adsorbed by TNP affinity columns. Collectively, these results indicate that although the monoclonal 3-10 suppressor factor has affinity for DNP, focusing of the factor on the TDH cells requires recognition of DNP in the context of the appropriate MHC determinant, Kd.     

The inhibitory effect of naringenin on atopic dermatitis induced by DNFB in NC/Nga mice

Aims

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic and relapsing inflammatory dermatitis characterized by pruritic and eczematous skin lesions. Here, we investigated the therapeutic effect of the fruit flavonoid naringenin on DNFB induced atopic dermatitis mice model.

Main methods

AD-like skin lesion was induced by repetitive skin contact with DNFB in NC/Nga mice and the effects of the fruit flavonoid naringenin were evaluated on the basis of histopathological findings of skin, ear swelling and cytokine production of CD4⁺T cells.

Key findings

Intraperitoneal injection of naringenin for one week after DNFB challenge significantly lowered ear swelling and improved back skin lesions. In addition, naringenin significantly suppressed production of interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) by activated CD4⁺ T cells and serum IgE level. Furthermore, naringenin reduced DNFB-induced infiltration of eosinophils, mast cells, CD4⁺ T cells, and CD8⁺ T cells in skin lesions.

Significance

Naringenin may suppress the development of AD-like skin lesions in DNFB-treated NC/Nga mice by reducing IFN-γ production of activated CD4⁺ T cells, serum IgE levels and infiltration of immune cells to skin lesion.     

Influence of contact sensitivity to DNFB on the induction of carrier-determined tolerance to DNP.

Contact sensitivity to DNFB, induced by skin painting Balb/c mice with DNFB had no influence on the induction of carrier determined tolerance to DNP. In contrast, contact sensitivity to DNFB, elicited in complete Freund's adjuvant, prevented induction of tolerance to DNP. This effect was not due to the adjuvant alone and was hapten specific since contact sensitivity induced by OCBC in complete adjuvant had no influence on tolerance induction to DNP. In addition, in mice primed with DNFB in complete Freund's adjuvant, the tolerogen becomes immunogenic. It is suggested that the T-cell mediating tolerance to DNP-autologous IgG is different from the T-cell mediating contact sensitivity to DNP autologous carrier. DNFB in complete adjuvant may augment not only contact-sensitized T-cells, which mediate contact sensitivity, but also T-cells which have helper function in the antibody response to DNP.     

Immunopotentiating effects of amphotericin B. I. Enhanced contact sensitivity in mice.

Contact sensitivity responses to dinitrofluorobenzene (DNFB) or oxazolone were enhanced by amphotericin B (AmB) administration. This adjuvant effect of AmB was documented in mice by ear thickness measurements, ear histology, and the 5-iodo-2'-deoxyuridine-125I ear assay. The optimum immunopotentiating effect of AmB required its simultaneous administration at the time of skin sensitization. AmB-induced adjuvant effects were also observed in adoptive transfer experiments in which syngeneic recipients of lymph node cells from animals sensitized with DNFB plus AmB gave stronger contact sensitivity responses than recipients of cells from mice sensitized with DNFB alone. AmB also interfered with tolerance induction by i.v. dinitrobenzene sulfonic acid, suggesting that its adjuvant effects involve inhibition of suppressor cells or their precursors.     

Immunopotentiating effects of amphotericin B. II. Enhanced in vitro proliferative responses of murine lymphocytes.

Enhanced in vitro proliferative responses to DNBSO3 were seen in lymph node cells and spleen cells after in vivo sensitization of mice with DNFB plus AmB compared with mice primed with DNFB alone. The T cell proliferation in the nylon column nonadherent fraction for both groups was highly similar, and the enhanced lymph node cell proliferation with AmB was demonstrated to be in the nylon adherent population consisting of both T and B cells. These and earlier studies of immunopotentiation by AmB are consistent with a mechanism that depends on selective interaction of the polyene with a subset of T cells and a resultant impairment of the normally induced suppressor regulation that limits the magnitude and duration of immune responses.     

Regulation of contact sensitivity to DNFB in the mouse: effects of adult thymectomy and thymic factor.

The contact sensitivity response to DNFB is decreased after adult thymectomy (ATX). This response decreases to 50% of the control response of normal age-matched mice as soon as 3 weeks after ATX and is not further depressed 9 to 16 weeks after ATX. These results suggest that two T cell subsets of different lifespan are involved in the anti-DNFB response. A circulating thymic factor (FTS) is able to restore the contact sensitivity response to DNFB when injected 3 to 9 weeks after ATX but not 16 weeks later. By contrast, FTS has a depressive effect on the contact sensitivity response to DNFB of normal mice through a cyclophosphamide-sensitive T cell subset. These results suggest that FTS regulates DNFB contact sensitivity by acting on a cyclophosphamide-sensitive T cell subset, still present 9 weeks after ATX but absent after 16 weeks. Thus although the T cell defect, causing a depression of the contact sensitivity reaction to DNFB is quantitatively similar 3 and 16 weeks after ATX, its nature is probably different.