Characterization of a Novel Class of Interspersed LTR Elements in Primate Genomes: Structure, Genomic Distribution, and Evolution

Retrovirus-like sequences and their solitary (solo) long terminal repeats (LTRs) are common repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. We reported previously that the tandemly arrayed genes encoding U2 snRNA (the RNU2 locus) in humans and apes contain a solo LTR (U2-LTR) which was presumably generated by homologous recombination between the two LTRs of an ancestral provirus that is retained in the orthologous baboon RNU2 locus. We have now sequenced the orthologous U2-LTRs in human, chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, and baboon and examined numerous homologs of the U2-LTR that are dispersed throughout the human genome. Although these U2-LTR homologs have been collectively referred to as LTR13 in the literature, they do not display sequence similarity to any known retroviral LTRs; however, the structure of LTR13 closely resembles that of other retroviral LTRs with a putative promoter, polyadenylation signal, and a tandemly repeated 53-bp enhancer-like element. Genomic blotting indicates that LTR13 is primate-specific; based on sequence analysis, we estimate there are about 2,500 LTR13 elements in the human genome. Comparison of the primate U2-LTR sequences suggests that the homologous recombination event that gave rise to the solo U2-LTR occurred soon after insertion of the ancestral provirus into the ancestral U2 tandem array. Phylogenetic analysis of the LTR13 family confirms that it is diverse, but the orthologous U2-LTRs form a coherent group in which chimpanzee is closest to the humans; orangutan is a clear outgroup of human, chimpanzee, and gorilla; and baboon is a distant relative of human, chimpanzee, gorilla, and orangutan. We compare the LTR13 family with other known LTRs and consider whether these LTRs might play a role in concerted evolution of the primate RNU2 locus. Received: 29 September 1997 / Accepted: 16 January 1998     

Analysis of Orthologous Retrovirus-Like Elements in the White-Footed Mouse,Peromyscus leucopus

Three loci in the genome of the white-footed mouse, Peromyscus leucopus, were examined for the presence or absence of orthologous copies of the retrovirus-like element mys using polymerase chain reaction. We examined these loci in 28 mice collected throughout the P. leucopus species range. Mys insertions were present in only one of the individuals examined at the mys-1 and mys-7 loci. Conversely, the mys-6 element was found in several individuals, but the presence of this element was limited to northern latitudes. Because the long terminal repeats (LTRs) of a given element are expected to be identical at the time of retrotransposition into the genome, and to accumulate changes over evolutionary time, within-element LTR sequence comparisons can be used to estimate the relative age of insertions. Within-element LTR differences are greater in mys-6 than in mys-1 or mys-7. The LTRs from orthologous mys-6 elements of six mice were sequenced. The alignment revealed 13 of the 22 differences between the right and left LTRs that were shared by all orthologous mys-6 sites, suggesting that relative to its time of insertion into the genome, mys-6 has only recently spread across the northern part of the species range. Received: 23 January 1996 / Accepted: 24 April 1996     

Interelement Selection in the Regulatory Region of the copia Retrotransposon

We report the results of an analysis of naturally occurring cis-regulatory variation within and between two families of the copia Drosophila long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon. The copia 5′ LTR and adjacent untranslated leader region (ULR) consists of a number of well-characterized sequence motifs which play a role in regulating expression of the element. In order to understand the evolutionary forces which may be responsible for generating and maintaining copia regulatory sequence variation, we have quantified levels of naturally occurring copia LTR-ULR nucleotide variation and subjected the data to a series of tests of neutrality. Our analysis indicates that the copia LTR-ULR has been subject to negative purifying selection within families and positive adaptive selection between families. We discuss these findings with respect to the regulatory evolution of retrotransposons and the phenomenon of interelement selection. Received: 5 February 1998 / Accepted: 14 May 1998     

Expression and intracellular localization of leptin receptor long isoform-GFP chimera

The leptin receptor (OBR) and its ligand leptin (OB) are key players in the regulation of body weight. The OBR is a member of the class I cytokine receptor family and is alternatively spliced into at least six different isoforms. The multiple forms are identical in their extracellular and transmembrane regions but differ in lengths. The two predominant isoforms include a long form (OBR(l)) with an intracellular domain of 303 amino acids and a shorter form (OBR(s)) with an intracellular domain of 34 amino acids. We have constructed a recombinant OBR(l) chimera with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) by fusing GFP to the C-terminus of the OBR(l). The OBR(l)-GFP chimera was transiently transfected and expressed in SHSY5Y and HEK293 cells. In a STAT-Luciferase assay we show that the GFP moiety in this chimera did not affect the signalling capacity of OBR(l)-GFP. In both SHSY5Y and HEK293 cells transfected with OBR(l)-GFP, a predominant intracellular green OBR(l)-GFP fluorescence was detected in vesicles also positive for internalized fluorophore conjugated leptin. We also found that treatment with the lysosomotropic reagent monensin did not relocalize OBR(l)-GFP together with the human transferrin receptor in recycling endosomes, indicating OBR(l)-GFP not to participate in this pathway. In biotinylation-streptavidin pulse chase experiments, using antibodies raised against GFP and OBR, we observed that the rate of early appearance of OBR(s) at the cell surface, upon leptin stimulation, was faster than that found for OBR(l)-GFP. Taken together, our results provide novel data concerning the intracellular trafficking of the two different isoforms of the leptin receptor.     

New way of regulating alternative splicing in retroviruses: the promoter makes a difference

Alternative splicing has been recognized as a major mechanism for creating proteomic diversity from a limited number of genes. However, not all determinants regulating this process have been characterized. Using subviral human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) env constructs we observed an enhanced splicing of the RNA when expression was under control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter instead of the HIV long terminal repeat (LTR). We extended these observations to LTR- or CMV-driven murine leukemia proviruses, suggesting that retroviral LTRs are adapted to inefficient alternative splicing at most sites in order to maintain balanced gene expression.     

Evidence for the Role of Recombination in the Regulatory Evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Ty Elements

The recent completion of the sequencing of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome provides a unique opportunity to analyze the evolutionary relationships existing among the entire complement of retrotransposons residing within a single genome. In this article we report the results of such an analysis of two closely related families of yeast long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposons, Ty1 and Ty2. In our study, we analyzed the molecular variation existing among the 32 Ty1 and 13 Ty2 elements present within the S. cerevisiae genome recently sequenced within the context of the yeast genome project. Our results indicate that while the Ty1 family is most likely ancestral to Ty2 elements, both families of elements are relatively recent components of the S. cerevisiae genome. Our results also indicate that both families of elements have been subject to purifying selection within their protein coding regions. Finally, and perhaps most interestingly, our results indicate that a relatively recent recombination event has occurred between Ty2 and a subclass of Ty1 elements involving the LTR regulatory region. We discuss the possible biological significance of these findings and, in particular, how they contribute to a better overall understanding of LTR retrotransposon evolution. Received: 30 September 1997 / Accepted: 3 February 1998