An investigation of the ligand binding properties and negative cooperativity of soluble insulin-like growth factor receptors

To investigate the interaction of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) ligands with the insulin-like growth factor type 1 receptor (IGF-1R), we have generated two soluble variants of the IGF-1R. We have recombinantly expressed the ectodomain of IGF-1R or fused this domain to the constant domain from the Fc fragment of mouse immunoglobulin. The ligand binding properties of these soluble IGF-1Rs for IGF-I and IGF-II were investigated using conventional ligand competition assays and BIAcore biosensor technology. In ligand competition assays, the soluble IGF-1Rs both bound IGF-I with similar affinities and a 5-fold lower affinity than that seen for the wild type receptor. In addition, both soluble receptors bound IGF-II with similar affinities to the wild type receptor. BIAcore analyses showed that both soluble IGF-1Rs exhibited similar ligand-specific association and dissociation rates for IGF-I and for IGF-II. The soluble IGF-1R proteins both exhibited negative cooperativity for IGF-I, IGF-II, and the 24-60 antibody, which binds to the IGF-1R cysteine-rich domain. We conclude that the addition of the self-associating Fc domain to the IGF-1R ectodomain does not affect ligand binding affinity, which is in contrast to the soluble ectodomain of the IR. This study highlights some significant differences in ligand binding modes between the IGF-1R and the insulin receptor, which may ultimately contribute to the different biological activities conferred by the two receptors.     

Specificity of insulin-like growth factor binding to type-II IGF receptors in rabbit mammary gland and hypophysectomized rat liver

We have reevaluated IGF binding specificity to membrane receptors in rabbit mammary gland (RMG) and hypophysectomized rat liver (HRL) using recombinant DNA-derived and synthetic analogues of human IGF-I and highly purified IGF-II. SDS-PAGE demonstrated that [125I]IGF-I bound to type-I IGF receptors in RMG; this binding was inhibited in a similar fashion by the IGF-I analogues (IC50 = 10 ng/ml) and to a lesser extent by IGF-II (IC50 = 60 ng/ml). [125I]IGF-II bound to type-II IGF receptors in both RMG and HRL. The IC50 for IGF-II was 9 and 3 ng/ml with RMG and HRL, respectively. At a dose as high as 1 microgram/ml, IGF-I analogues inhibited less than 20% of [125I]IGF-II binding. These results suggest that IGF-I has little or no affinity for type-II IGF receptors.     

BIAcore analysis of bovine insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-2 identifies major IGF binding site determinants in both the amino- and carboxyl-terminal domains

In the absence of a complete tertiary structure to define the molecular basis of the high affinity binding interaction between insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) and IGF-binding proteins (IGFBPs), we have investigated binding of IGFs by discrete amino-terminal domains (amino acid residues 1-93, 1-104, 1-132, and 1-185) and carboxyl-terminal domains (amino acid residues 96-279, 136-279, and 182-284) of bovine IGFBP-2 (bIGFBP-2). Both halves of bIGFBP-2 bound IGF-I and IGF-II in BIAcore studies, albeit with different affinities ((1-132)IGFBP-2, K(D) = 36.3 and 51.8 nm; (136-279)IGFBP-2HIS, K(D) = 23.8 and 16.3 nm, respectively). The amino-terminal half appears to contain components responsible for fast association. In contrast, IGF binding by the carboxyl-terminal fragment results in a more stable complex as reflected by its K(D). Furthermore, des(1-3)IGF-I and des(1-6)IGF-II exhibited reduced binding affinity to (1-279)IGFBP-2HIS, (1-132)IGFBP-2, and (136-279)IGFBP-2HIS biosensor surfaces compared with wild-type IGF. A charge reversal at positions 3 and 6 of IGF-I and IGF-II, respectively, affects binding interactions with the amino-terminal fragment and full-length bIGFBP-2 but not the carboxyl-terminal fragment.     

A novel binding site for the human insulin-like growth factor-II (IGF-II)/mannose 6-phosphate receptor on IGF-II

The mammalian insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-II/cation-independent mannose 6-phosphate receptor (IGF2R) binds IGF-II with high affinity. By targeting IGF-II to lysosomal degradation, it plays a role in the maintenance of correct IGF-II levels in the circulation and in target tissues. Loss of IGF2R function is associated with tumor progression; therefore, the IGF2R is often referred to as a tumor suppressor. The interaction between IGF2R and IGF-II involves domains 11 and 13 of the 15 extracellular domains of the receptor. Recently, a hydrophobic binding region was identified on domain 11 of the IGF2R. In contrast, relatively little is known about the residues of IGF-II that are involved in IGF2R binding and the determinants of IGF2R specificity for IGF-II over the structurally related IGF-I. Using a series of novel IGF-II analogues and surface plasmon resonance assays, this study revealed a novel binding surface on IGF-II critical for IGF2R binding. The hydrophobic residues Phe(19) and Leu(53) are critical for IGF2R binding, as are residues Thr(16) and Asp(52). Furthermore, Thr(16) was identified as playing a major role in determining why IGF-II, but not IGF-I, binds with high affinity to the IGF2R.     

Role of N- and C-terminal residues of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding protein-3 in regulating IGF complex formation and receptor activation

Insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), the major IGFBP in the circulation, sequesters IGF in a stable ternary complex with the acid-labile subunit. The high affinity IGF-binding site is proposed to reside within an N-terminal hydrophobic domain in IGFBP-3, but C-terminal residues have also been implicated in the homologous protein IGFBP-5. We have mutated in various combinations Leu(77), Leu(80), and Leu(81) in the N terminus and Gly(217) and Gln(223) in the C terminus of IGF-BP-3. All mutants retained immunoreactivity toward a polyclonal IGFBP-3 antibody, whereas IGF ligand blotting showed that all of the mutants had reduced binding to IGFs. Both solution IGF binding assays and BIAcore analysis indicated that mutations to the N-terminal region caused greater reduction in IGF binding activity than C-terminal mutations. The combined N- and C-terminal mutants showed undetectable binding to IGF-I but retained <10% IGF-II binding activity. Reduced ternary complex formation was seen only in mutants that had considerably reduced IGF-I binding, consistent with previous studies indicating that the binary IGF.IGFBP-3 complex is required for acid-labile subunit binding. Decreased IGF binding was also reflected in the inability of the mutants to inhibit IGF-I signaling in IGF receptor overexpressing cells. However, when present in excess, IGFBP-3 analogs defined as non-IGF-binding by biochemical assays could still inhibit IGF signaling. This suggests that residual binding activity of IGFBP-3 mutants may still be sufficient to inhibit IGF biological activity and questions the use of such analogs to study IGF-independent effects of IGFBP-3.     

Precise mapping of an IGF-I-binding site on the IGF-1R

The IGF-1R [type 1 IGF (insulin-like growth factor) receptor] is activated upon binding to IGF-I and IGF-II leading to cell growth, survival and migration of both normal and cancerous cells. We have characterized the binding interaction between the IGF-1R and its ligands using two high-affinity mouse anti-IGF-1R mAbs (monoclonal antibodies), 7C2 and 9E11. These mAbs both block IGF-I binding to the IGF-1R but have no effect on IGF-II binding. Epitope mapping using chimaeras of the IGF-1R and insulin receptor revealed that the mAbs bind to the CR (cysteine-rich) domain of IGF-1R. The epitope was finely mapped using single point mutations in the IGF-1R. Mutation of Phe241, Phe251 or Phe266 completely abolished 7C2 and 9E11 binding. The three-dimensional structure showed that these residues cluster on the surface of the CR-domain. BIAcore analyses revealed that IGF-I and a chimaeric IGF-II with the IGF-I C-domain competed for the binding of both mAbs with the IGF-1R, whereas neither IGF-II nor a chimaeric IGF-I with the IGF-II C-domain affected antibody binding. We therefore conclude the IGF-I C-domain interacts with the CR (cysteine-rich) domain of the receptor at the cluster of residues Phe241, Phe251 and Phe266. These results allow precise orientation of IGF-I within the IGF-I-IGF-1R complex involving the IGF-I C-domain binding to the IGF-1R CR domain. In addition, mAbs 7C2 and 9E11 inhibited both IGF-I- and IGF-II-induced cancer cell proliferation, migration and IGF-1R down-regulation, demonstrating that targeting the IGF-1R is an effective strategy for inhibition of cancer cell growth.     

Computational model for the IGF-II/IGF2r complex that is predictive of mutational and surface plasmon resonance data

Insulin-like growth factors (IGFs) are key regulators of cell proliferation, differentiation, and transformation, and are thus pivotal in cancer, especially breast, prostate, and colon neoplasm. Their potent mitogenic and anti-apoptotic actions depend primarily on their availability to bind to the signaling IGF cell surface receptors. One mechanism by which IGF-II availability is thought to be modulated is by binding to the nonsignaling IGF-II receptor (IGF2R). This binding is essentially mediated by domain 11 in the multidomain IGF2R extracellular region. The crystal structure of domain 11 of the human IGF-II receptor (IGF2R-d11) has identified a putative IGF-II binding site, and a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) solution structure for the IGF-II ligand has also been characterized. These structures have now been used to model in silico the protein-protein interaction between IGF-II and IGF2R-d11 using the program 3D-Dock. Because the IGF-II data comprise an ensemble of 20 structures, all of which satisfy the NMR constraints, the docking procedure was applied to each member of the ensemble. Only those models in which residue Ile1572 of IGF2R-d11, known to be essential for the binding of IGF-II, was at the interface were considered further. These plausible complexes were then critically assessed using an array of analysis techniques including consideration of additional mutagenesis data. One model was strongly supported by these analyses and is discussed here in detail. Furthermore, we demonstrate in vitro experimental support for this model by studying the binding of chimeras of IGF-I and IGF-II to IGF2R fragments.     

Human osteoblast-derived insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein-5 stimulates osteoblast mitogenesis and potentiates IGF action.

Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-binding proteins (IGFBPs) either inhibit or enhance IGF-stimulated cellular effects. While inhibition occurs by sequestration of IGF from cell-surface receptors, the exact mechanism of IGF-enhancement remains undefined. Human osteoblast-like bone cells in culture secrete several IGF-binding proteins, one of which we have previously identified as IGFBP-5. In this study we purified a 23-kDa IGFBP-5 from cultures of human osteoblast-like cells using ligand affinity chromatography and reversed-phase high performance liquid chromatography and tested its bioactivity in serum-free cultures of normal mouse osteoblast-like cells. Binding studies with radioiodinated IGF showed similar and relatively low affinities for IGF-I and IGF-II consistent with a carboxyl truncated IGF-binding protein. Mitogenic assays demonstrated that the binding protein, when coincubated with IGF-I or -II, enhanced mitogenesis. This enhancement was unique from other binding proteins in not requiring a preincubation period or serum co-factors. Furthermore, the osteoblast-derived IGFBP-5 stimulated mitogenesis in the absence of exogenous or endogenous IGF. Using radioiodinated IGFBP-5 we found that the binding protein could associate with the osteoblast surface, an effect which did not require IGF nor an interaction with IGF receptors. We suggest that osteoblast-derived IGFBP-5 may stimulate osteoblast mitogenesis in at least two ways, by association with IGF and by a second pathway that is independent of IGF receptor activation.     

IGF binding proteins and their functions

The insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding proteins (IGFBPs) have several functions, including transporting the IGFs in the circulation, mediating IGF transport out of the vascular compartment, localizing the IGFs to specific cell types, and modulating both IGF binding to receptors and growth-promoting actions. The functions of IGFBPs appear to be altered by posttranslational modifications. IGFBP-3, -4, -5, and -6 have been shown to be glycosylated. Likewise all the IGFBPs have a complex disulfide bond structure that is required for maintenance of normal IGF binding. IGFBP-2, -3, -4, and -5 are proteolytically cleaved, and specific proteases have been characterized for IGFBP-3, -4, and -5. Interestingly, attachment of IGF-I or II to IGFBP-4 results in enhancement of proteolysis, whereas attachment of either growth factor to IGFBP-5 results in inhibition of proteolytic cleavage. Cleavage of IGFBP-3 results in the appearance of a 31 kDa fragment that is 50-fold reduced in its affinity for the IGF-I or IGF-II. In spite of the reduction in its affinity, this fragment is capable of potentiating the effect of IGF-I on cell growth responses; therefore, proteolysis may be a specific mechanism that alters IGFBP modulation of IGF actions. Other processes that result in a reduction in IGF binding protein affinity are associated with potentiation of cellular responses to IGF-I and -II. Specifically, the binding of IGFBP-3 to cell surfaces is associated with its ability to enhance IGF action and with a ten- to 12-fold reduction in its affinity for IGF-I and IGF-II. Likewise, binding of IGFBP-5 to extracellular matrix (ECM) results in an eightfold reduction in its affinity and a 60% increase in cell growth in response to IGF-I. Another post-translational modification that modifies IGFBP activity is phosphorylation. IGFBP-1, -2, -3, and -5 have been shown to be phosphorylated. Phosphorylation of IGFBP-1 results in a sixfold enhancement in its affinity for IGF-I and -II. Following this enhancement of IGFBP-1 affinity, this binding protein loses its capacity to potentiate IGF-I growth-promoting activity. Future studies using site-directed mutagenesis to modify these proteins should enable us to determine the effect of these posttranslational modifications on the ability of IGFBPs to modulate IGF biologic activity. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Structural determinants for high-affinity binding of insulin-like growth factor II to insulin receptor (IR)-A, the exon 11 minus isoform of the IR

The insulin receptor (IR) lacking the alternatively spliced exon 11 (IR-A) is preferentially expressed in fetal and cancer cells. The IR-A has been identified as a high-affinity receptor for insulin and IGF-II but not IGF-I, which it binds with substantially lower affinity. Several cancer cell types that express the IR-A also overexpress IGF-II, suggesting a possible autocrine proliferative loop. To determine the regions of IGF-I and IGF-II responsible for this differential affinity, chimeras were made where the C and D domains were exchanged between IGF-I and IGF-II either singly or together. The abilities of these chimeras to bind to, and activate, the IR-A were investigated. We also investigated the ability of these chimeras to bind and activate the IR exon 11+ isoform (IR-B) and as a positive control, the IGF-I receptor (IGF-1R). We show that the C domain and, to a lesser extent, the D domains represent the principal determinants of the binding differences between IGF-I and IGF-II to IR-A. The C and D domains of IGF-II promote higher affinity binding to the IR-A than the equivalent domains of IGF-I, resulting in an affinity close to that of insulin for the IR-A. The C and D domains also regulate the IR-B binding specificity of the IGFs in a similar manner, although the level of binding for all IGF ligands to IR-B is lower than to IR-A. In contrast, the C and D domains of IGF-I allow higher affinity binding to the IGF-1R than the analogous domains of IGF-II. Activation of IGF-1R by the chimeras reflected their binding affinities whereas the phosphorylation of the two IR isoforms was more complex.     

Cardiomyoblast apoptosis induced by insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I resistance is IGF-II dependent and synergistically enhanced by angiotensin II

Objective: This study explores the synergistic effect of cardiomyoblast apoptosis induced by angiotensin II (Ang II) and Insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I resistance, and elucidates the role of IGF-II via IGF-II receptor (R) and calcineurin pathways in apoptosis induced by Ang II and IGF-I resistance. Methods: Apoptosis of cultured cardiomyoblast H9c2 cells was assessed by DNA fragmentation on agarose gel electrophoresis, nuclear condensation stained with DAPI, and Western blot analysis of pro-apoptotic Bad and cytochrome c in various combinations of control, Ang II, antisense IGF (I or II), IGF (I or II) antibody, IGF (I or II) receptor (R) antibody, or calcineurin inhibitor (Cyclosporine A, (CsA)). Results: We found the following: (1) The combination of Ang II and IGF-I deficiencies had a synergistic effect on apoptosis, confirmed by DNA fragmentation, nuclei condensation, and increases in such pro-apoptotic proteins as Bad, cytochrome c, caspase 9, and caspase 3 in H9c2 cells. (2) IGF-II and IGF-IIR protein products were increased by antisense IGF-I and IGF-I resistance, but these IGF-II protein products were not affected by sense IGF-I and non-specific antibody IgG in H9c2 cells. (3) The alteration of Bad protein level and the release of cytochrome c, both induced by treatments containing combinations of Ang II and antisense IGF-I, IGF-I antibody or IGF-IR antibody, were inhibited by IGF-II antibody. (4) DNA fragmentation, Bad, and cytochrome c which was induced by treatments combining IGF-IR antibody with Ang II or combining IGF-IR antibody with IGF-II were remarkably attenuated by CsA. Conclusion: IGF-I deficiency and/or IGF-IR resistance induced apoptosis in cardiomyoblast cells. The apoptosis, which might have been caused by the upregulation of IGF-II and IGF-IIR genes possibly activated the downstream calcineurin pathway, was synergistically augmented by Ang II. The last two authors contributed equally.     

Growth hormone-dependent insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein from human plasma differs from other human IGF binding proteins

A growth hormone-dependent binding protein for insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) has been isolated from human plasma. Analyzed on SDS gels, the preparation contained a major protein band of 53 kDa, and a minor band of 47 kDa. After transfer to nitrocellulose, both species bound iodinated IGF-I, and could be detected using an antibody raised against the purified preparation. In contrast, an IGF binding protein purified from human amniotic fluid bound IGF-I but was not detectable immunologically. The amino acid comparison of the plasma binding protein preparation was different from that reported for amniotic fluid and HEP G2 hepatoma proteins, and the unique amino-terminal sequence, Gly-Ala-Ser-Ser-Ala-Gly-Leu-Gly-Pro-Val-, was different from that of the amniotic fluid and hepatoma proteins. This study indicates that the growth hormone-dependent IGF binding protein of human plasma is structurally and immunologically distinct from other IGF binding proteins.     

Structure of a functional IGF2R fragment determined from the anomalous scattering of sulfur

Insulin-like growth factor II receptor (IGF2R) is a multifunctional cell surface receptor implicated in tumour suppression. Its growth inhibitory activity has been associated with an ability to bind IGF-II. IGF2R contains 15 homologous extracellular domains, with domain 11 primarily responsible for IGF-II binding. We report a 1.4 A resolution crystal structure of domain 11, solved using the anomalous scattering signal of sulfur. The structure consists of two crossed beta-sheets forming a flattened beta-barrel. Structural analysis identifies the putative IGF-II binding site at one end of the beta-barrel whilst crystal lattice contacts suggest a model for the full-length IGF2R extracellular region. The structure factors and coordinates of IGF2R domain 11 have been deposited in the Protein Data Bank (accession codes 1GP0 and 1GP3).     

IGF-II is up-regulated and myofibres are hypertrophied in regenerating soleus of mice lacking FGF6

Important functions in myogenesis have been proposed for FGF6, a member of the fibroblast growth factor family accumulating almost exclusively in the myogenic lineage. However, the use of FGF6(-/-) mutant mice gave contradictory results and the role of FGF6 during myogenesis remains largely unclear. Using FGF6(-/-) mice, we first analysed the morphology of the regenerated soleus following cardiotoxin injection and showed hypertrophied myofibres in soleus of the mutant mice as compared to wild-type mice. Secondly, to examine the function of the IGF family in the hypertrophy process, we used semiquantitative and real-time RT-PCR assays and Western blots to monitor the expression of the insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II), their receptors [type I IGF receptor (IGF1R) and IGF-II receptor (IGF2R)], and of a binding protein IGFBP-5 in regenerating soleus muscles of FGF6(-/-) knockout mice vs. wild-type mice. In the mutant, both IGF-II and IGF2R, but not IGF-I and IGF1R, were strongly up-regulated, whereas IGFBP5 was down-regulated, strongly suggesting that, in the absence of FGF6, the mechanisms leading to myofibre hypertrophy were mediated specifically by an IGF-II/IGF2R signalling pathway distinct from the classic mechanism involving IGF-I and IGF1R previously described for skeletal muscle hypertrophy. The potential regulating role of IGFBP5 on IGF-II expression is also discussed. This report shows for the first time a specific role for FGF6 in the regulation of myofibre size during a process of in vivo myogenesis.     

Insulin-like growth factors (IGF-I and IGF-II) inhibit C2 skeletal myoblast differentiation and enhance TNF alpha-induced apoptosis

IGF-I and IGF-II are thought to be unique in their ability to promote muscle cell differentiation. Murine C2 myoblasts differentiate when placed into low serum media (LSM), accompanied by increased IGF-II and IGF binding protein-5 (IGFBP-5) production. Addition of 20 ng/ml TNF alpha on transfer into LSM blocked differentiation, IGF-II and IGFBP-5 secretion and induced apoptosis. We, therefore, wished to assess whether IGFs could protect against the effects of TNF alpha. Neither inhibition of differentiation or induction of apoptosis was rescued by co-incubation with IGF-I or IGF-II. A lower dose of TNF alpha (1 ng/ml) while not inducing apoptosis still inhibited myoblast differentiation by 56% +/- 12, (P < 0.001), indicating that induction of apoptosis is not the sole mechanism by which TNF alpha inhibits myoblast differentiation. Addition of IGF-I or IGF-II alone reduced differentiation by 49% +/- 15 and 33% +/- 20, respectively, (P < 0.001), although neither induced apoptosis. For muscle cells to differentiate, they must arrest in G0. We established that addition of IGF-I, IGF-II or TNF alpha to the myoblasts promoted proliferation. The myoblasts could not exit the cell cycle as efficiently as controls and differentiation was thus reduced. Unexpectedly, co-incubation of IGF-I or IGF-II with 1 ng/ml TNF alpha enhanced the inhibition of differentiation and induced apoptosis. In the absence of apoptosis we show an association between IGF-induced inhibition of differentiation and increased IGFBP-5 secretion. These results indicate that the effects of the IGFs on muscle may depend on the cytokine environment. In the absence of TNF alpha, the IGFs delay differentiation and promote myoblast proliferation whereas in the presence of TNF alpha the IGFs induce apoptosis.     

Heterogeneity of insulin-like growth factor-I affinity for the insulin-like growth factor-II receptor: comparison of natural, synthetic and recombinant DNA-derived insulin-like growth factor-I

Although insulin-like growth factors (IGF) I and II bind with high affinity to structurally discrete receptors, they bind with a lesser affinity to each other's receptor. We have evaluated the affinity of five different IGF-I preparations (three natural IGF-I preparations, one synthetic preparation, and one recombinant DNA-derived) for the IGF-II receptor in rat placental membranes, 18-54,SF cells and BRL-3A cells. In all tissues tested, the natural IGF-I preparations demonstrated an affinity for the IGF-II receptor which was 10-20% that of IGF-II. However, the recombinant and synthetic IGF-I preparations exhibited substantially lower affinities than natural IGF-I for this receptor, with only 10-25% reduction in (125-I)iodo IGF-II binding at peptide concentrations up to 400 ng/ml. Radioimmunoassay of the natural IGF-I preparations with an antibody directed against the unique C-peptide region of IGF-II demonstrated that contamination of IGF-I preparations with immunoreactive IGF-II could not exceed 5%. These results demonstrate that IGF-I purified from human plasma has a different affinity for the IGF-II receptor than does synthetic or recombinant IGF-I. Furthermore, these data are consistent with the hypothesis that IGF-I, itself, may be heterogeneous, and that subforms may vary in their affinities for the IGF receptors. Alternatively, IGF-I preparations which have been considered to be pure may be contaminated with small amounts of IGF-II, resulting in overestimation of the affinity of IGF-I for the type II IGF receptor.     

IGF receptors in myocardial capillary endothelium: potential regulation of IGF-I transport to cardiac muscle

Beating rat hearts were perfused with 125I-IGF-II alone or 125I-IGF-II and unlabeled IGF-II or insulin, then prepared for radioautography. Maximal 125I-IGF-II grain counts over capillaries were decreased in a dose-dependent manner by unlabeled IGF-II but were unaffected by coperfusion with insulin. To determine a potential role for capillary receptors in the transfer of circulating IGF to cardiac muscle, the effects of sequential loss of capillary IGF binding sites was determined. For IGF-I, loss of capillary binding sites by trypsin perfusion was accompanied by proportional decreases in the subsequent appearance of IGF-I in cardiac muscle. In contrast, similar decrements of capillary IGF-II binding did not affect muscle levels of IGF-II. We conclude that capillary endothelium of the intact heart possesses distinct IGF-I and IGF-II binding sites, with the capillary IGF-I binding sites being of potential importance in the transfer of vascular IGF-I to subendothelial cardiac muscle.     

Cooperativity of the N- and C-terminal domains of insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding protein 2 in IGF binding

A family of six insulin-like growth factor (IGF) binding proteins (IGFBP-1-6) binds IGF-I and IGF-II with high affinity and thus regulates their bioavailability and biological functions. IGFBPs consist of N- and C-terminal domains, which are highly conserved and cysteine-rich, joined by a variable linker domain. The role of the C-domain in IGF binding is not completely understood in that C-domain fragments have very low or even undetectable IGF binding affinity, but loss of the C-domain dramatically disrupts IGF binding by IGFBPs. We recently reported the solution structure and backbone dynamics of the C-domain of IGFBP-2 (C-BP-2) and identified a pH-dependent heparin binding site [Kuang, Z., Yao, S., Keizer, D. W., Wang, C. C., Bach, L. A., Forbes, B. E., Wallace, J. C., and Norton, R. S. (2006) Structure, dynamics and heparin binding of the C-terminal domain of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-2 (IGFBP-2), J. Mol. Biol. 364, 690-704]. Here, we have analyzed the molecular interactions among the N-domain of IGFBP-2 (N-BP-2), C-BP-2, and IGFs using cross-linking and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. The binding of C-BP-2 to the IGF-I.N-BP-2 binary complex was significantly stronger than the binding of C-BP-2 to IGF-I alone, switching from intermediate exchange to slow exchange on the NMR time scale. A conformational change or stabilization of the IGF-I Phe49-Leu54 region and the Phe49 aromatic ring upon binding to the N-domains, as well as an interdomain interaction between N-BP-2 and C-BP-2 (which is also detectable in the absence of ligand), may contribute to this cooperativity in IGF binding. Glycosaminoglycan binding by IGFBPs can affect their IGF binding although the effects appear to differ among different IGFBPs; here, we found that heparin bound to the IGF-I.N-BP-2.C-BP-2 ternary complex, but did not cause it to dissociate.     

Expression of IGF system genes during T-antigen driven pituitary tumorigenesis.

Expression of IGF-I, IGF-II, the Type-I IGF receptor and six IGF binding proteins were examined in three different T-ag-driven mouse tumors. Unlike the widespread expression of IGF-II in pancreatic beta-cell tumors, IGF-II was not widely expressed in the two different pituitary tumors examined indicating that a mechanism independent of focal IGF-II expression can also drive T-antigen tumorigenesis. In addition, multiple IGF binding proteins were expressed in all three tumor types. This expression, however, was generally heterogeneous with no specific changes to indicate a required role for any IGF binding protein in T-antigen tumorigenesis.