Differential requirement of unfolded protein response pathway for calreticulin expression in Caenorhabditis elegans

Accumulation of unfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum triggers the unfolded protein response (UPR) pathway, which increases the expression of chaperones to maintain the homeostasis. Calreticulin is a calcium-binding chaperone located in the lumen of endoplasmic reticulum (ER). Here we show that in response to a UPR inducing reagent, tunicamycin, the expression of calreticulin (crt-1) is specifically up-regulated in Caenorhabditis elegans. Tunicamycin (TM) induced expression of the crt-1 requires IRE-1 and XBP-1 but is ATF-6 and PEK-1 independent. Analysis of the crt-1 promoter reveals a putative XBP-1 binding site at the -284 to -278 bp region, which was shown to be necessary for TM-mediated induction. Genetic analysis of crt-1 mutants and mutants of UPR pathway genes show various degrees of developmental arrest upon TM treatment. Our results suggest that the TM-induced UPR pathway culminates in the up-regulation of crt-1, which protects the worm from deleterious accumulation of unfolded proteins in the ER. Knockdown of the crt-1, pdi-2, or pdi-3 increased the crt-1 expression, whereas knockdown of the hsp-3 or hsp-4 did not have any effect on crt-1 expression, indicating the existence of complex compensatory networks to cope up with ER stress.     

未折叠蛋白质应答

内质网是真核细胞中蛋白质合成、折叠与分泌的重要细胞器.细胞进化出一套完整的机制来监督和帮助内质网内蛋白质的折叠与修饰.而当错误折叠的蛋白质累积时,细胞通过一系列信号转导途径,对其进行应答,包括增强蛋白质折叠能力、停滞大多数蛋白质的翻译、加速蛋白质的降解等.如果内质网功能素乱持续,细胞将最终启动凋亡程序.这些反应被统称为未折叠蛋白质应答(unfolded protein response,UPR).UPR是多个信号转导通路的总称,包括IRE1-XBP1、PERK-ATF4以及ATF6等信号途径.除了应激条件外,UPR还被用于正常生理条件下的调节,例如胆固醇合成代谢的负反馈调控.     

Role of the unfolded protein response in cell death

Unfolded protein response (UPR) is an important genomic response to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress. The ER chaperones, GRP78 and Gadd153, play critical roles in cell survival or cell death as part of the UPR, which is regulated by three signaling pathways: PERK/ATF4, IRE1/XBP1 and ATF6. During the UPR, accumulated unfolded protein is either correctly refolded, or unsuccessfully refolded and degraded by the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway. When the unfolded protein exceeds a threshold, damaged cells are committed to cell death, which is mediated by ATF4 and ATF6, as well as activation of the JNK/AP-1/Gadd153-signaling pathway. Gadd153 suppresses activation of Bcl-2 and NF-κB. UPR-mediated cell survival or cell death is regulated by the balance of GRP78 and Gadd153 expression, which is coregulated by NF-κB in accordance with the magnitude of ER stress. Less susceptibility to cell death upon activation of the UPR may contribute to tumor progression and drug resistance of solid tumors.     

Drosophila as a model for unfolded protein response research

Endoplasmic Reticulum (ER) is an organelle where most secretory and membrane proteins are synthesized, folded, and undergo further maturation. As numerous conditions can perturb such ER function, eukaryotic cells are equipped with responsive signaling pathways, widely referred to as the Unfolded Protein Response (UPR). Chronic conditions of ER stress that cannot be fully resolved by UPR, or conditions that impair UPR signaling itself, are associated with many metabolic and degenerative diseases. In recent years, Drosophila has been actively employed to study such connections between UPR and disease. Notably, the UPR pathways are largely conserved between Drosophila and humans, and the mediating genes are essential for development in both organisms, indicating their requirement to resolve inherent stress. By now, many Drosophila mutations are known to impose stress in the ER, and a number of these appear similar to those that underlie human diseases. In addition, studies have employed the strategy of overexpressing human mutations in Drosophila tissues to perform genetic modifier screens. The fact that the basic UPR pathways are conserved, together with the availability of many human disease models in this organism, makes Drosophila a powerful tool for studying human disease mechanisms. [BMB Reports 2015; 48(8): 445-453]     

Evaluating endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response through the lens of ecology and evolution

Considerable progress has been made in understanding the physiological basis for variation in the life-history patterns of animals, particularly with regard to the roles of oxidative stress and hormonal regulation. However, an underappreciated and understudied area that could play a role in mediating inter- and intraspecific variation of life history is endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, and the resulting unfolded protein response (UPR^ER). ER stress response and the UPR^ER maintain proteostasis in cells by reducing the intracellular load of secretory proteins and enhancing protein folding capacity or initiating apoptosis in cells that cannot recover. Proper modulation of the ER stress response and execution of the UPR^ER allow animals to respond to intracellular and extracellular stressors and adapt to constantly changing environments. ER stress responses are heritable and there is considerable individual variation in UPR^ER phenotype in animals, suggesting that ER stress and UPR^ER phenotype can be subjected to natural selection. The variation in UPR^ER phenotype presumably reflects the way animals respond to ER stress and environmental challenges. Most of what we know about ER stress and the UPR^ER in animals has either come from biomedical studies using cell culture or from experiments involving conventional laboratory or agriculturally important models that exhibit limited genetic diversity. Furthermore, these studies involve the assessment of experimentally induced qualitative changes in gene expression as opposed to the quantitative variations that occur in naturally existing populations. Almost all of these studies were conducted in controlled settings that are often quite different from the conditions animals experience in nature. Herein, we review studies that investigated ER stress and the UPR^ER in relation to key life-history traits including growth and development, reproduction, bioenergetics and physical performance, and ageing and senescence. We then ask if these studies can inform us about the role of ER stress and the UPR^ER in mediating the aforementioned life-history traits in free-living animals. We propose that there is a need to conduct experiments pertaining to ER stress and the UPR^ER in ecologically relevant settings, to characterize variation in ER stress and the UPR^ER in free-living animals, and to relate the observed variation to key life-history traits. We urge others to integrate multiple physiological systems and investigate how interactions between ER stress and oxidative stress shape life-history trade-offs in free-living animals.     

Attenuation of unfolded protein response and apoptosis by mReg2 induced GRP78 in mouse insulinoma cells

Murine regenerating (mReg) genes have been implicated in preserving islet cell biology. Expanding on our previous work showing that overexpression of mReg2 protects MIN6 insulinoma cells against streptozotocin-induced apoptosis, we now demonstrate that mReg2 induces glucose-regulated peptide 78 (GRP78) expression via the Akt–mTORC1 axis and protects MIN6 cells against ER stress induced by thapsigargin and glucolipotoxicity. Activation of mTORC1 activity results from both mReg2-induced increased mTOR phosphorylation as well as increased expression of Raptor and GβL. Inhibition of Akt and mTORC1 blunted the ability of mReg2 to induce GRP78 and attenuate unfolded protein response (UPR). Knockdown of GRP78 sensitized the cells overexpressing mReg2 to UPR without affecting its ability to activate Akt–mTORC1 signaling. Induced expression of mReg2 may protect insulin producing cells from ER stress in diabetes.     

ER stress differentially regulates the stabilities of ERAD ubiquitin ligases and their substrates

Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress-induced accumulation of misfolded proteins in the ER stimulates the ER-associated degradation (ERAD) process. ERAD in turn eliminates those misfolded proteins. Upregulation of ubiquitination enzymes is an essential mechanism by which ER stress enhances ERAD. However, ectopic overexpression of ubiquitination enzymes often fails to increase, and sometimes, inhibits ERAD. To further understand how ER stress regulates ERAD, we studied the effects of ER stress on ubiquitin ligase (E3) gp78-mediated ERAD and on the stabilities of gp78 and another ERAD E3 Hrd1. The results showed that ER stress-inducing agent tunicamycin significantly enhanced ERAD in cells that either express endogenous or overexpress gp78. Importantly, ER stress could increase ERAD even when new protein synthesis was inhibited by cycloheximide. Surprisingly, tunicamycin treatment stabilized gp78, an established ERAD E3 and an ERAD substrate as well, for up to 8h. By contrast, ER stress had little effects on the stability of another E3 Hrd1 except that it reduced the total ubiquitination level of Hrd1. Our data suggest that ER stress differentially regulates the stabilities of ERAD E3s and their substrates, which may represent a novel mechanism by which ER stress increases ERAD.