Proteins and Glycoproteins of Paramyxoviruses: a Comparison of Simian Virus 5, Newcastle Disease Virus, and Sendai Virus

The polypeptides of three paramyxoviruses (simian virus 5, Newcastle disease virus, and Sendai virus) were separated by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Glycoproteins were identified by the use of radioactive glucosamine as a carbohydrate precursor. The protein patterns reveal similarities among the three viruses. Each virus contains at least five or six proteins, two of which are glycoproteins. Four of the proteins found in each virus share common features with corresponding proteins in the other two viruses, including similar molecular weights. These four proteins are the nucleocapsid protein (molecular weight 56,000 to 61,000), a larger glycoprotein (molecular weight 65,000 to 74,000), a smaller glycoprotein (molecular weight 53,000 to 56,000), and a major protein which is the smallest protein in each virion (molecular weight 38,000 to 41,000).     

Contributions of the Avian Influenza Virus HA,NA, and M2 Surface Proteins to the Induction of Neutralizing Antibodies and Protective Immunity

Highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV) subtype H5N1 causes severe disease and mortality in poultry. Increased transmission of H5N1 HPAIV from birds to humans is a serious threat to public health. We evaluated the individual contributions of each of the three HPAIV surface proteins, namely, the hemagglutinin (HA), the neuraminidase (NA), and the M2 proteins, to the induction of HPAIV-neutralizing serum antibodies and protective immunity in chickens. Using reverse genetics, three recombinant Newcastle disease viruses (rNDVs) were engineered, each expressing the HA, NA, or M2 protein of H5N1 HPAIV. Chickens were immunized with NDVs expressing a single antigen (HA, NA, and M2), two antigens (HA+NA, HA+M2, and NA+M2), or three antigens (HA+NA+M2). Immunization with HA or NA induced high titers of HPAIV-neutralizing serum antibodies, with the response to HA being greater, thus identifying HA and NA as independent neutralization antigens. M2 did not induce a detectable neutralizing serum antibody response, and inclusion of M2 with HA or NA reduced the magnitude of the response. Immunization with HA alone or in combination with NA induced complete protection against HPAIV challenge. Immunization with NA alone or in combination with M2 did not prevent death following challenge, but extended the time period before death. Immunization with M2 alone had no effect on morbidity or mortality. Thus, there was no indication that M2 is immunogenic or protective. Furthermore, inclusion of NA in addition to HA in a vaccine preparation for chickens may not enhance the high level of protection provided by HA.Avian influenza (AI) is an economically important disease of poultry worldwide. Avian influenza virus (AIV) belongs to the genus Influenzavirus A under the family Orthomyxoviridae. The genome of AIV consists of eight segments of single-stranded, negative-sense RNA that codes for 11 proteins (PB2, PB1, PB1-F2, PA, HA, NP, NA, M1, M2, NS1, and NS2/NEP). The genome is surrounded by the viral envelope that has two glycoprotein spikes on its outer surface, hemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA). The HA spikes have receptor binding and fusion functions, and NA spikes have receptor-destroying activity. The envelope also contains a third integral membrane protein, M2, which is exposed on the outer surface and functions as an ion channel, essential for uncoating. The AIV surface glycoproteins are antigenically variable and are serologically divided into 16 HA (H1 to H16) and 9 NA (N1 to N9) subtypes, whereas the nonglycosylated surface protein M2 is highly conserved (9, 43). On the basis of severity of disease in poultry, AIV strains are also classified into low-pathogenic (LP) and highly pathogenic (HP) categories. Historically, highly pathogenic avian influenza viruses (HPAIV) of subtypes H5 and H7 have caused severe disease and mortality in poultry. Recent HPAIV subtype H5N1 infections have resulted in the culling or death of more than 500 million poultry in more than 62 countries (27). Since 1997, HPAIV strains of subtype H5N1 have been found to cause disease in humans. To date, this virus has caused 436 confirmed human infections. Of these infections, 262 (60%) were fatal. Hence, HPAIV has become a major threat to both animals and humans (45). The World Organisation of Animal Health (OIE) recommends the control of HPAIV at its poultry source to decrease the viral load in susceptible avian species, thereby decreasing the risk of transmission to humans (31). The traditional method of control of HPAI has been stamping out infected flocks, which is still used in many countries, including the United States. But, due to economic reasons, culling of infected flocks is no longer considered a practical method for the control of AI in either developed or developing countries. Vaccination has been recommended by the OIE to control AI (31). Several vaccination strategies, including inactivated and live attenuated vaccines, have been evaluated for HPAIV (28). Inactivated vaccines are not commonly used because of the high cost and the difficulty in “differentiating infected from vaccinated animals” (DIVA). Live attenuated vaccines are not used because of the concern that the vaccine viruses may, through either mutation or genetic reassortment with circulating strains, become virulent (1). To overcome these difficulties, recombinant DNA technology was used to generate vectored, subunit, or DNA vaccines. Although several of these vaccines have been shown experimentally to protect against AIV, Newcastle disease virus (NDV)-vectored vaccines have shown the most promising results and also have the advantage of being bivalent vaccines against both NDV and AIV (11, 25, 32, 42). Furthermore, NDV-vectored vaccines have also been evaluated in primates with promising results (6). Newcastle disease (ND) is an economically important disease in poultry worldwide. The causative agent (NDV) is a nonsegmented, negative-strand RNA virus belonging to the genus Avulavirus in the family Paramyxoviridae. NDV strains vary greatly in virulence. Virulent NDV strains cause a severe respiratory and neurologic disease in poultry worldwide. Naturally occurring avirulent NDV strains are routinely used to control ND in many parts of world (30).We recently evaluated recombinant NDV (rNDV) expressing the HA protein of an H5N1 HPAIV vaccine (rNDV-HA) in chickens (25). Chickens immunized with rNDV-HA produced NDV- and HPAIV H5-specific antibodies and were protected against clinical disease after challenge with virulent NDV or HPAIV. Furthermore, shedding of the challenge virus was not observed, indicating complete protection. Our results demonstrated that rNDV-HA is a suitable bivalent vaccine against NDV and AIV (25). To date, all NDV-vectored vaccine studies in chickens have used HA genes derived from various HPAIV strains (11, 25, 32, 42). However, in addition to the HA protein, the envelope of AIV contains two other proteins (NA and M2) on its outer surface. Although antibodies to NA are thought not to play any role in viral attachment and penetration of the host cell, they prevent the release of virus from infected cells (20) and increase overall resistance to AIV infection in humans (37). The NA gene is thought to evolve at a lower rate than the HA gene, indicating that NA-specific antibodies may increase the breadth of protection of the HA-specific antibodies (19). The other surface protein, M2, functions as an ion channel protein and also as a target for anti-HPAIV drugs. The role of M2 protein in the induction of HPAIV-neutralizing antibodies and protective immunity is not well understood. Antibodies induced by the M2e peptide corresponding to the N-terminal 24-amino-acid ectodomain (the portion present on the virus surface) displayed broad protection against influenza A viruses of both homologous (H1N1) and heterologous (H3N1) strains in vitro and in vivo (7). However, the role of entire length of the M2 protein of AIV in induction of neutralizing antibodies and protective immunity against highly pathogenic H5N1 influenza virus in chickens has not been directly evaluated. The M2 protein is conserved among all influenza A viruses and is therefore considered an attractive target for a “universal” vaccine (8). Antibodies to HA protein alone can protect against lethal AIV challenges; the inclusion of other surface proteins in the vaccine regimen may improve the protective efficacy.In the present study, we examined the relative contribution of each of the three HPAIV surface proteins (HA, NA, and M2) to induction of neutralizing antibodies and protective immunity in chickens. Recombinant NDV vectors were constructed that individually expressed each of the three HPAIV surface proteins. They were used to immunize chickens either individually or in different possible combinations. Evaluation of the relative neutralization titers of serum antibody, shedding of challenge virus, and protection against lethal HPAIV challenge conferred by each of the NDV-vectored HPAIV surface proteins showed that HA glycoprotein was the major contributor to induction of neutralizing antibodies and protective immunity, followed by NA protein, which conferred partial protection. The M2 protein neither induced a detectable level of serum-neutralizing antibodies nor protected chickens from the HPAIV lethal challenge.     

Full Inactivation of Human Influenza Virus by High Hydrostatic Pressure Preserves Virus Structure and Membrane Fusion While Conferring Protection to Mice against Infection

Whole inactivated vaccines (WIVs) possess greater immunogenicity than split or subunit vaccines, and recent studies have demonstrated that WIVs with preserved fusogenic activity are more protective than non-fusogenic WIVs. In this work, we describe the inactivation of human influenza virus X-31 by high hydrostatic pressure (HHP) and analyze the effects on the structure by spectroscopic measurements, light scattering, and electron microscopy. We also investigated the effects of HHP on the glycoprotein activity and fusogenic activity of the viral particles. The electron microscopy data showed pore formation on the viral envelope, but the general morphology was preserved, and small variations were seen in the particle structure. The activity of hemagglutinin (HA) during the process of binding and fusion was affected in a time-dependent manner, but neuraminidase (NA) activity was not affected. Infectious activity ceased after 3 hours of pressurization, and mice were protected from infection after being vaccinated. Our results revealed full viral inactivation with overall preservation of viral structure and maintenance of fusogenic activity, thereby conferring protection against infection. A strong response consisting of serum immunoglobulin IgG1, IgG2a, and serum and mucosal IgA was also detected after vaccination. Thus, our data strongly suggest that applying hydrostatic pressure may be an effective method for developing new vaccines against influenza A as well as other viruses.     

In Vivo Distribution of the Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Simian Immunodeficiency Virus Coreceptors: CXCR4, CCR3, and CCR5

We have evaluated the in vivo distribution of the major human immunodeficiency virus/simian immunodeficiency virus (HIV/SIV) coreceptors, CXCR4, CCR3, and CCR5, in both rhesus macaques and humans. T lymphocytes and macrophages in both lymphoid and nonlymphoid tissues are the major cell populations expressing HIV/SIV coreceptors, reaffirming that these cells are the major targets of HIV/SIV infection in vivo. In lymphoid tissues such as the lymph node and the thymus, approximately 1 to 10% of the T lymphocytes and macrophages are coreceptor positive. However, coreceptor expression was not detected on follicular dendritic cells (FDC) in lymph nodes, suggesting that the ability of FDC to trap extracellular virions is unlikely to be mediated by a coreceptor-specific mechanism. In the thymus, a large number of immature and mature T lymphocytes express CXCR4, which may render these cells susceptible to infection by syncytium-inducing viral variants that use this coreceptor for entry. In addition, various degrees of coreceptor expression are found among different tissues and also among different cells within the same tissues. Coreceptor-positive cells are more frequently identified in the colon than in the rectum and more frequently identified in the cervix than in the vagina, suggesting that the expression levels of coreceptors are differentially regulated at different anatomic sites. Furthermore, extremely high levels of CXCR4 and CCR3 expression are found on the neurons from both the central and peripheral nervous systems. These findings may be helpful in understanding certain aspects of HIV and SIV pathogenesis and transmission.     

Mutagenesis of CXCR4 Identifies Important Domains for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 X4 Isolate Envelope-Mediated Membrane Fusion and Virus Entry and Reveals Cryptic Coreceptor Activity for R5 Isolates

CXCR4 is a chemokine receptor and a coreceptor for T-cell-line-tropic (X4) and dual-tropic (R5X4) human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) isolates. Cells coexpressing CXCR4 and CD4 will fuse with appropriate HIV-1 envelope glycoprotein (Env)-expressing cells. The delineation of the critical regions involved in the interactions within the Env-CD4-coreceptor complex are presently under intensive investigation, and the use of chimeras of coreceptor molecules has provided valuable information. To define these regions in greater detail, we have employed a strategy involving alanine-scanning mutagenesis of the extracellular domains of CXCR4 coupled with a highly sensitive reporter gene assay for HIV-1 Env-mediated membrane fusion. Using a panel of 41 different CXCR4 mutants, we have identified several charged residues that appear important for coreceptor activity for X4 Envs; the mutations E15A (in which the glutamic acid residue at position 15 is replaced by alanine) and E32A in the N terminus, D97A in extracellular loop 1 (ecl-1), and R188A in ecl-2 impaired coreceptor activity for X4 and R5X4 Envs. In addition, substitution of alanine for any of the four extracellular cysteines alone resulted in conformational changes of various degrees, while mutants with paired cysteine deletions partially retained their structure. Our data support the notion that all four cysteines are involved in disulfide bond formation. We have also identified substitutions which greatly enhance or convert CXCR4's coreceptor activity to support R5 Env-mediated fusion (N11A, R30A, D187A, and D193A), and together our data suggest the presence of conserved extracellular elements, common to both CXCR4 and CCR5, involved in their coreceptor activities. These data will help us to better detail the CXCR4 structural requirements exhibited by different HIV-1 strains and will direct further mutagenesis efforts aimed at better defining the domains in CXCR4 involved in the HIV-1 Env-mediated fusion process.     

Patterns of CCR5, CXCR4, and CCR3 Usage by Envelope Glycoproteins from Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Primary Isolates

Coreceptor usage by Envs from diverse primary human immunodeficiency virus type 1 isolates was analyzed by a vaccinia virus-based expression and assay system. Usage of recombinant CCR5 and CXCR4 correlated closely with fusogenicity toward macrophages and T-cell lines expressing endogenous coreceptors. Surprisingly, recombinant CCR3 was utilized by most primary and T-cell-line-adapted Envs. Endogenous CXCR4 in macrophages was functional as a coreceptor.     

Effects of CCR5 and CD4 Cell Surface Concentrations on Infections by Macrophagetropic Isolates of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

It has been proposed that changes in cell surface concentrations of coreceptors may control infections by human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1), but the mechanisms of coreceptor function and the concentration dependencies of their activities are unknown. To study these issues and to generate stable clones of adherent cells able to efficiently titer diverse isolates of HIV-1, we generated two panels of HeLa-CD4/CCR5 cells in which individual clones express either large or small quantities of CD4 and distinct amounts of CCR5. The panels were made by transducing parental HeLa-CD4 cells with the retroviral vector SFF-CCR5. Derivative clones expressed a wide range of CCR5 quantities which were between 7.0 × 10² and 1.3 × 10⁵ molecules/cell as measured by binding antibodies specific for CCR5 and the chemokine [¹²⁵I]MIP1β. CCR5 was mobile in the membranes, as indicated by antibody-induced patching. In cells with a large amount of CD4, an unexpectedly low trace of CCR5 (between 7 × 10² and 2.0 × 10³ molecules/cell) was sufficient for maximal susceptibility to all tested HIV-1, including primary patient macrophagetropic and T-cell-tropic isolates. Indeed, the titers as indicated by immunoperoxidase staining of infected foci were as high as the tissue culture infectious doses measured in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. In contrast, cells with a small amount of CD4 required a much larger quantity of CCR5 for maximal infection by macrophagetropic HIV-1 (ca. 1.0 × 10⁴ to 2.0 × 10⁴ molecules/cell). Cells that expressed low and high amounts of CD4 were infected with equal efficiencies when CCR5 concentrations were above threshold levels for maximal infection. Our results suggest that the concentrations of CD4 and CCR5 required for efficient infections by macrophagetropic HIV-1 are interdependent and that the requirements for each are increased when the other component is present in a limiting amount. We conclude that CD4 and CCR5 directly or indirectly interact in a concentration-dependent manner within a pathway that is essential for infection by macrophagetropic HIV-1. In addition, our results suggest that multivalent virus-receptor bonds and diffusion in the membrane contribute to HIV-1 infections.     

H3N2亚型人流行性感冒病毒HA1的蛋白序列同源性比较、变异规律及结构与功能的分析

应用生物信息学数据库和工具,结合自身的实验结果,对现有的H3N2亚型人流行性感冒(流感)病毒全球分离株的HA1氨基酸序列和蛋白分子结构进行了分析研究.初步的进化分析结果表明,历史上的分离株大致分为以年代划分为特征的两大谱系,即1968～1984/1985年的谱系,时间跨度为18年;1984/1985～1997/2000年的谱系,时间跨度为13～17年.它们分别起源于两类毒株,并在各自的谱系内发展演化,基本上不存在大规模相互交叉渗透的现象.在1984/1985年,两大谱系发生交替转换和过渡,说明流感病毒的起源、发展和演化是有一定规律性的,这可能对流感的监测预报有一定的指导意义.绝大多数毒株的二硫键组成位点和糖基化位点是极其保守的.受体结合位点(RBS)的一部分构成成份保守;其他构成成份发生变异甚至高变,并与某些抗原决定簇位点重合,可能参与了抗原抗体相互作用.5个抗原决定簇位点的变异各有其特点.A和B位点的变异表现最活跃,抗原性最强,但B位点稍弱于A位点.C和D位点的抗原性一般,且D位点的变异性低于C位点.E位点抗原性一般.在各位置的变异中,大多常是相同相近性质或相同种类的氨基酸相互替换.HA1蛋白全序列的熵(entropy)峰值作图的分析表明,HA1蛋白上121～126位等区域或位点可能独立,或参与构成了某些已知或未知的抗原决定簇位点.这很可能是新发现的或未被鉴定的抗原决定簇位点或其组成.     

Primary Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 2 (HIV-2) Isolates Infect CD4-Negative Cells via CCR5 and CXCR4: Comparison with HIV-1 and Simian Immunodeficiency Virus and Relevance to Cell Tropism In Vivo

Cell surface receptors exploited by human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) for infection are major determinants of tropism. HIV-1 usually requires two receptors to infect cells. Gp120 on HIV-1 virions binds CD4 on the cell surface, triggering conformational rearrangements that create or expose a binding site for a seven-transmembrane (7TM) coreceptor. Although HIV-2 and SIV strains also use CD4, several laboratory-adapted HIV-2 strains infect cells without CD4, via an interaction with the coreceptor CXCR4. Moreover, the envelope glycoproteins of SIV of macaques (SIV(MAC)) can bind to and initiate infection of CD4(-) cells via CCR5. Here, we show that most primary HIV-2 isolates can infect either CCR5(+) or CXCR4(+) cells without CD4. The efficiency of CD4-independent infection by HIV-2 was comparable to that of SIV, but markedly higher than that of HIV-1. CD4-independent HIV-2 strains that could use both CCR5 and CXCR4 to infect CD4(+) cells were only able to use one of these receptors in the absence of CD4. Our observations therefore indicate (i) that HIV-2 and SIV envelope glycoproteins form a distinct conformation that enables contact with a 7TM receptor without CD4, and (ii) the use of CD4 enables a wider range of 7TM receptors to be exploited for infection and may assist adaptation or switching to new coreceptors in vivo. Primary CD4(-) fetal astrocyte cultures expressed CXCR4 and supported replication by the T-cell-line-adapted ROD/B strain. Productive infection by primary X4 strains was only triggered upon treatment of virus with soluble CD4. Thus, many primary HIV-2 strains infect CCR5(+) or CXCR4(+) cell lines without CD4 in vitro. CD4(-) cells that express these coreceptors in vivo, however, may still resist HIV-2 entry due to insufficient coreceptor concentration on the cell surface to trigger fusion or their expression in a conformation nonfunctional as a coreceptor. Our study, however, emphasizes that primary HIV-2 strains carry the potential to infect CD4(-) cells expressing CCR5 or CXCR4 in vivo.     

Specific and Independent Recognition of U3 and U5 att Sites by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Integrase In Vivo

The retroviral attachment (att) sites at viral DNA ends are cis-acting regions essential for proviral integration. To investigate the sequence features of att important for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integration in vivo, we generated a series of 25 att mutants of HIV-1 by mutagenesis of the U3, U5, or both boundaries of att. Our results indicated that the terminal 11 or 12 bp of viral DNA are sufficient for specific recognition by HIV-1 integrase (IN) and suggested that IN might recognize each att site independently in vivo.     

NA Proteins of Influenza A Viruses H1N1/2009, H5N1, and H9N2 Show Differential Effects on Infection Initiation,Virus Release,and Cell-Cell Fusion

Two surface glycoproteins of influenza virus, haemagglutinin (HA) and neuraminidase (NA), play opposite roles in terms of their interaction with host sialic acid receptors. HA attaches to sialic acid on host cell surface receptors to initiate virus infection while NA removes these sialic acids to facilitate release of progeny virions. This functional opposition requires a balance. To explore what might happen when NA of an influenza virus was replaced by one from another isolate or subtype, in this study, we generated three recombinant influenza A viruses in the background of A/PR/8/34 (PR8) (H1N1) and with NA genes obtained respectively from the 2009 pandemic H1N1 virus, a highly pathogenic avian H5N1 virus, and a lowly pathogenic avian H9N2 virus. These recombinant viruses, rPR8-H1N1NA, rPR8-H5N1NA, and rPR8-H9N2NA, were shown to have similar growth kinetics in cells and pathogenicity in mice. However, much more rPR8-H5N1NA and PR8-wt virions were released from chicken erythrocytes than virions of rPR8-H1N1NA and rPR8-H9N2NA after 1 h. In addition, in MDCK cells, rPR8-H5N1NA and rPR8-H9N2NA infected a higher percentage of cells, and induced cell-cell fusion faster and more extensively than PR8-wt and rPR8-H1N1NA did in the early phase of infection. In conclusion, NA replacement in this study did not affect virus replication kinetics but had different effects on infection initiation, virus release and fusion of infected cells. These phenomena might be partially due to NA proteins’ different specificity to α2-3/2-6-sialylated carbohydrate chains, but the exact mechanism remains to be explored.     

Modulation of Hepatitis C Virus NS5A Hyperphosphorylation by Nonstructural Proteins NS3, NS4A, and NS4B

NS5A of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a highly phosphorylated protein involved in resistance against interferon and required most likely for replication of the viral genome. Phosphorylation of this protein is mediated by a cellular kinase(s) generating multiple proteins with different electrophoretic mobilities. In the case of the genotype 1b isolate HCV-J, in addition to the basal phosphorylated NS5A (designated pp56), a hyperphosphorylated form (pp58) was found on coexpression of NS4A (T. Kaneko, Y. Tanji, S. Satoh, M. Hijikata, S. Asabe, K. Kimura, and K. Shimotohno, Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 205:320-326, 1994). Using a comparative analysis of two full-length genomes of genotype 1b, competent or defective for NS5A hyperphosphorylation, we investigated the requirements for this NS5A modification. We found that hyperphosphorylation occurs when NS5A is expressed as part of a continuous NS3-5A polyprotein but not when it is expressed on its own or trans complemented with one or several other viral proteins. Results obtained with chimeras of both genomes show that single amino acid substitutions within NS3 that do not affect polyprotein cleavage can enhance or reduce NS5A hyperphosphorylation. Furthermore, mutations in the central or carboxy-terminal NS4A domain as well as small deletions in NS4B can also reduce or block hyperphosphorylation without affecting polyprotein processing. These requirements most likely reflect the formation of a highly ordered NS3-5A multisubunit complex responsible for the differential phosphorylation of NS5A and probably also for modulation of its biological activities.     

Safety and Tolerability of Conserved Region Vaccines Vectored by Plasmid DNA,Simian Adenovirus and Modified Vaccinia Virus Ankara Administered to Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1-Uninfected Adults in a Randomized,Single-Blind Phase I Trial

Trial Design

HIV-1 vaccine development has advanced slowly due to viral antigenic diversity, poor immunogenicity and recently, safety concerns associated with human adenovirus serotype-5 vectors. To tackle HIV-1 variation, we designed a unique T-cell immunogen HIVconsv from functionally conserved regions of the HIV-1 proteome, which were presented to the immune system using a heterologous prime-boost combination of plasmid DNA, a non-replicating simian (chimpanzee) adenovirus ChAdV-63 and a non-replicating poxvirus, modified vaccinia virus Ankara. A block-randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled phase I trial HIV-CORE 002 administered for the first time candidate HIV-1- vaccines or placebo to 32 healthy HIV-1/2-uninfected adults in Oxford, UK and elicited high frequencies of HIV-1-specific T cells capable of inhibiting HIV-1 replication in vitro. Here, detail safety and tolerability of these vaccines are reported.

Methods

Local and systemic reactogenicity data were collected using structured interviews and study-specific diary cards. Data on all other adverse events were collected using open questions. Serum neutralizing antibody titres to ChAdV-63 were determined before and after vaccination.

Results

Two volunteers withdrew for vaccine-unrelated reasons. No vaccine-related serious adverse events or reactions occurred during 190 person-months of follow-up. Local and systemic events after vaccination occurred in 27/32 individuals and most were mild (severity grade 1) and predominantly transient (<48 hours). Myalgia and flu-like symptoms were more strongly associated with MVA than ChAdV63 or DNA vectors and more common in vaccine recipients than in placebo. There were no intercurrent HIV-1 infections during follow-up. 2/24 volunteers had low ChAdV-63-neutralizing titres at baseline and 7 increased their titres to over 200 with a median (range) of 633 (231-1533) post-vaccination, which is of no safety concern.

Conclusions

These data demonstrate safety and good tolerability of the pSG2.HIVconsv DNA, ChAdV63.HIVconsv and MVA.HIVconsv vaccines and together with their high immunogenicity support their further development towards efficacy studies.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov {"type":"clinical-trial","attrs":{"text":"NCT01151319","term_id":"NCT01151319"}}NCT01151319     

RIC-3 Exclusively Enhances the Surface Expression of Human Homomeric 5-Hydroxytryptamine Type 3A (5-HT3A) Receptors Despite Direct Interactions with 5-HT3A, -C, -D, and -E Subunits

Although five 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) subunits (A–E) have been cloned, knowledge on the regulation of their assembly is limited. RIC-3 has been identified as a chaperone specific for the pentameric ligand-gated nicotinic acetylcholine and 5-HT₃ receptors. Therefore, we examined the impact of RIC-3 on differently composed 5-HT₃ receptors with the focus on 5-HT3C, -D, and -E subunits. The influence of RIC-3 on these receptor subtypes is supported by the presence of RIC3 mRNA in tissues expressing at least one of the subunits 5-HT3C, -D, and -E. Furthermore, immunocytochemical studies on transfected mammalian cells revealed co-localization in the endoplasmic reticulum and direct interaction of RIC-3 with 5-HT3A, -C, -D, and -E. Functional and pharmacological characterization was performed using HEK293 cells expressing 5-HT3A or 5-HT3A + 5-HT3B (or -C, -D, or -E) in the presence or absence of RIC-3. Ca²⁺ influx analyses revealed that RIC-3 does not influence the 5-HT concentration-response relationship on 5-HT₃A receptors but leads to differential increases of 5-HT-induced maximum response (E_max) on cells expressing different subunits. Increases of E_max were due to analogously enhanced B_max values for binding of the 5-HT₃ receptor antagonist [³H]GR65630. The observed enhanced cell surface expression of the tested 5-HT3 subunit combinations correlated with the increased surface expression of 5-HT3A as determined by flow cytometry. In conclusion, we showed that RIC-3 can interact with 5-HT3A, -C, -D, and -E subunits and predominantly enhances the surface expression of homomeric 5-HT₃A receptors in HEK293 cells. These data implicate a possible role of RIC-3 in determining 5-HT₃ receptor composition in vivo.     

Microglia Express CCR5, CXCR4, and CCR3, but of These, CCR5 Is the Principal Coreceptor for Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Dementia Isolates

Microglia are the main human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) reservoir in the central nervous system and most likely play a major role in the development of HIV dementia (HIVD). To characterize human adult microglial chemokine receptors, we analyzed the expression and calcium signaling of CCR5, CCR3, and CXCR4 and their roles in HIV entry. Microglia expressed higher levels of CCR5 than of either CCR3 or CXCR4. Of these three chemokine receptors, only CCR5 and CXCR4 were able to transduce a signal in microglia in response to their respective ligands, MIP-1β and SDF-1α, as recorded by single-cell calcium flux experiments. We also found that CCR5 is the predominant coreceptor used for infection of human adult microglia by the HIV type 1 dementia isolates HIV-1_DS-br, HIV-1_RC-br, and HIV-1_YU-2, since the anti-CCR5 antibody 2D7 was able to dramatically inhibit microglial infection by both wild-type and single-round luciferase pseudotype reporter viruses. Anti-CCR3 (7B11) and anti-CXCR4 (12G5) antibodies had little or no effect on infection. Last, we found that virus pseudotyped with the DS-br and RC-br envelopes can infect cells transfected with CD4 in conjunction with the G-protein-coupled receptors APJ, CCR8, and GPR15, which have been previously implicated in HIV entry.     

Broadly Neutralizing Monoclonal Antibodies 2F5 and 4E10 Directed against the Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 gp41 Membrane-Proximal External Region Protect against Mucosal Challenge by Simian-Human Immunodeficiency Virus SHIVBa-L

The membrane-proximal external region (MPER) of HIV-1, located at the C terminus of the gp41 ectodomain, is conserved and crucial for viral fusion. Three broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bnMAbs), 2F5, 4E10, and Z13e1, are directed against linear epitopes mapped to the MPER, making this conserved region an important potential vaccine target. However, no MPER antibodies have been definitively shown to provide protection against HIV challenge. Here, we show that both MAbs 2F5 and 4E10 can provide complete protection against mucosal simian-human immunodeficiency virus (SHIV) challenge in macaques. MAb 2F5 or 4E10 was administered intravenously at 50 mg/kg to groups of six male Indian rhesus macaques 1 day prior to and again 1 day following intrarectal challenge with SHIV_Ba-L. In both groups, five out of six animals showed complete protection and sterilizing immunity, while for one animal in each group a low level of viral replication following challenge could not be ruled out. The study confirms the protective potential of 2F5 and 4E10 and supports emphasis on HIV immunogen design based on the MPER region of gp41.Eliciting broadly neutralizing antibodies is an important goal of HIV vaccine design efforts, and the study of broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies (bnMAbs) can assist in that goal. Human bnMAbs against both gp120 and gp41 of the HIV-1 envelope spike have been described. Three bnMAbs to gp41, 2F5, 4E10, and Z13e1, have been identified and shown to recognize neighboring linear epitopes on the membrane proximal external (MPER) region of gp41 (3, 24, 25, 37, 47). In a comprehensive cross-clade neutralization study by Binley et al., 2F5 neutralized 67% and 4E10 neutralized 100% of a diverse panel of 90 primary isolates (2). Similar broad neutralization was seen against sexually transmitted isolates cloned from acutely infected patients (22). More recently, a comprehensive study showed that 2F5 neutralized 97 isolates from a 162-virus panel (60%) and that 4E10 neutralized 159 isolates (98%) (41). Although less potent, the monoclonal antibody Z13, isolated from an antibody phage display library derived from a bone marrow donor whose serum was broadly neutralizing (47), has cross-clade neutralizing activity. Z13e1 is an affinity-enhanced variant of the earlier-characterized MAb Z13 that is directed against an access-restricted epitope between and overlapping the epitopes of 2F5 and 4E10. Both MAbs 2F5 and 4E10 were originally obtained as IgG3 antibodies in hybridomas derived from peripheral blood mononuclear blood lymphocytes (PBMCs) of HIV-1-seropositive nonsymptomatic patients and were later class switched to IgG1 to enable large-scale manufacturing and to prolong in vivo half-life (3, 6, 32).Despite the interest in the MPER as a vaccine target, there is limited information on the ability of MPER antibodies to act antivirally in vivo either in established infection or prophylactically. A study using the huPBL-SCID mouse model showed limited impact from 2F5 when the antibody was administered in established infection (31). Passive administration of 2G12, 2F5, and 4E10 to a cohort of acutely and chronically infected HIV-1 patients provided little direct evidence of 2F5 or 4E10 antiviral activity, whereas the emergence of escape variants indicated unequivocally the ability of 2G12 to act antivirally (18, 39). Indirect evidence did, however, suggest that the MPER MAbs may have affected virus replication, as indicated by viral rebound suppression in a patient known to have a 2G12-resistant virus prior to passive immunization (39). Another study of 10 individuals passively administered 2G12, 2F5, and 4E10 before and after cessation of combination antiretroviral therapy (ART) showed similarly that 2G12 treatment could delay viral rebound, but antiviral activity by 2F5 and 4E10 was not clearly demonstrated (21). In prophylaxis, an early 2F5 passive transfer study with chimpanzees suggested that the antibody could delay or lower the magnitude of primary viremia following HIV-1 challenge (7). A study using gene transfer of 2F5 in a humanized SCID mouse model suggested that continuous plasma levels of approximately 1 μg/ml of 2F5 may significantly reduce viral loads in LAI- and MN-challenged mice (34). Protection studies of rhesus macaques using simian-human immunodeficiency virus SHIV_89.6PD challenge did not provide definitive direct evidence for MPER antibody-mediated protection. One of three animals was protected against intravenous (i.v.) challenge when 2F5 was administered in a cocktail with HIVIG and 2G12 (19), but all three animals treated with 2F5 alone at high concentration became infected. In a vaginal challenge study with SHIV_89.6PD (20), four of five animals were protected with a cocktail of HIVIG, 2F5, and 2G12, but a 2F5/2G12 combination protected only two of five animals. Further protection studies have used MPER MAbs in combination with other MAbs, leaving the individual contributions of these antibodies uncertain (1, 8).In our previous studies, we successfully used the SHIV/macaque model to demonstrate neutralizing antibody protection against mucosal challenge, and we have begun to explore how that protection is achieved (12, 30). Here, we conducted a protection study with the two broadly neutralizing MPER-directed antibodies 2F5 and 4E10. We show that the antibodies can prevent viral infection and thereby support the MPER as a vaccine target.