Translation regulation after taxol treatment in NIH3T3 cells involves the elongation factor (eEF)2

Changes to the translational machinery that occur during apoptosis have been described in the last few years. The two principal ways in which translational factors are modified during apoptosis are: (i) changes in protein phosphorylation and (ii) specific proteolytic cleavages. Taxol, a member of a new class of anti-tubulin drugs, is currently used in chemotherapeutic treatments of different types of cancers. We have previously demonstrated that taxol induces calpain-mediated apoptosis in NIH3T3 cells [Pi?eiro et al., Exp. Cell Res., 2007, 313:369-379]. In this study we found that translation was significantly inhibited during taxol-induced apoptosis in these cells. We have studied the phosphorylation status and expression levels of eIF2a, eIF4E, eIF4G and the regulatory protein 4E-BP1, all of which are implicated in translation regulation. We found that taxol treatment did not induce changes in eIF2alpha phosphorylation, but strongly decreased eIF4G, eIF4E and 4E-BP1 expression levels. MDL28170, a specific inhibitor of calpain, prevented reduction of eIF4G, but not of eIF4E or 4E-BP1 levels. Moreover, the calpain inhibitor did not block taxol-induced translation inhibition. All together these findings demonstrated that none of these factors are responsible for the taxol-induced protein synthesis inhibition. On the contrary, taxol treatment increased elongation factor eEF2 phosphorylation in a calpain-independent manner, supporting a role for eEF2 in taxol-induced translation inhibition.     

Translation initiation factor modifications and the regulation of protein synthesis in apoptotic cells

The rate of protein synthesis is rapidly down-regulated in mammalian cells following the induction of apoptosis. Inhibition occurs at the level of polypeptide chain initiation and is accompanied by the phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of initiation factor eIF2 and the caspase-dependent cleavage of initiation factors eIF4G, eIF4B, eIF2alpha and the p35 subunit of eIF3. Proteolytic cleavage of these proteins yields characteristic products which may exert regulatory effects on the translational machinery. Inhibition of caspase activity protects protein synthesis from long-term inhibition in cells treated with some, but not all, inducers of apoptosis. This review describes the initiation factor modifications and the possible signalling pathways by which translation may be regulated during apoptosis. We discuss the significance of the initiation factor cleavages and other changes for protein synthesis, and the implications of these events for our understanding of the cellular changes associated with apoptosis.     

RGS2 promotes the translation of stress-associated proteins ATF4 and CHOP via its eIF2B-inhibitory domain

Regulator of G protein signaling 2 (RGS2) is upregulated by multiple forms of stress and can augment translational attenuation associated with the phosphorylation of the initiation factor eIF2, a hallmark of several stress-induced coping mechanisms. Under stress-induced translational inhibition, key factors, such as ATF4, are selectively expressed via alternative translation mechanisms. These factors are known to regulate molecular switches that control cell fate by regulating pro-survival and pro-apoptotic signals. The molecular mechanisms that balance these opposing responses to stresses are unclear. The present results suggest that RGS2 may be an important regulatory component in the cellular stress response through its translational control abilities. Previously, we have shown that RGS2 can interact with the translation initiation factor, eIF2B, and inhibit de novo protein synthesis. Here, we demonstrate that the expression of either full length RGS2 or its eIF2B-interacting domain (RGS2^eb) significantly increases levels of ATF4 and CHOP, both of which are linked to stress-induced apoptosis. Furthermore, we show that these effects are translationally regulated and independent of eIF2 phosphorylation. The present results thus point to a novel function of RGS2 in the stress response directly related to its ability to reduce global protein synthesis.     

Y-box Binding Protein 1: Providing a New Angle on Translational Regulation

Current models of translational regulation are mostly focused on how translational factors engage a messenger mRNA to the ribosome to initiate translation. Since the majority of mRNAs in eukaryotes are translated in a cap-dependent manner, the mRNA 5’ cap-binding protein eIF4E was characterized as a key player responsible for the recruitment of mRNAs to the initiation complex. The availability of eIF4E is believed to be especially critical for translational activation of mRNAs with extensive secondary structures in their 5’UTRs, many of which code for labile regulatory proteins essential for cell growth or viability. Surprisingly, little attention is paid to the other side of translational control, e.g., to define mechanisms responsible for translational silencing and storage of the above messages. In this review, we discuss the possibility that eIF4E per se may not be sufficient to release mRNAs from translational block. We found that many growth- and stress-related mRNAs are associated with the translational repressor YB-1, which can compete with the eIF4E-driven translation initiation complex for binding to the capped 5’ mRNA terminus. Moreover, the cap-dependent repressor activity of YB-1 appears to be negatively regulated via Akt-mediated phosphorylation of the Ser-102 residue of YB-1. Taken together with recent evidence suggesting that translational activation of growth-related messages is a primary cellular response to activation of Ras-Erk and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways, our data suggest that differential expression of specific mRNA subsets is regulated by the PI3K-Akt pathway and achieved via coordinated activation of the components of translational machinery and inactivation of general translational repressors such as YB-1.     

In vivo regulation of protein synthesis by phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of wheat eukaryotic initiation factor 2

The regulation of protein synthesis is a critical component in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis. A major mechanism of translational control in response to diverse abiotic and biotic stress signals involves the phosphorylation of the alpha subunit of eukaryotic initiation factor 2 (eIF2alpha). The pathway has been demonstrated in all eukaryotes except plants, although components of a putative plant pathway have been characterized. To evaluate the in vivo capability of plant eIF2alpha to participate in the translation pathway, we have used vaccinia virus recombinants that constitutively express wheat eIF2alpha and inducibly express the eIF2alpha dsRNA-stimulated protein kinase, PKR, in BSC-40 cells. Activation of PKR in cells expressing wild-type wheat eIF2alpha resulted in an inhibition of cellular and viral protein synthesis and an induction of cellular apoptosis correlating with phosphorylation of eIF2alpha on serine 51. Expression of a nonphosphorylatable mutant (51A) of plant eIF2alpha reversed the PKR-mediated translational block as well as the PKR-induced apoptosis. A direct interaction of the plant proteins with the mammalian translational initiation apparatus is supported by coimmunoprecipitation of wild-type plant eIF2alpha and the 51A mutant with mammalian eIF2gamma and the localization of the plant proteins in ribosome fractions. These findings suggest that plant eIF2alpha is capable of interacting with the guanine nucleotide exchange factor eIF2B within the context of the eIF2 holoenzyme and provide direct evidence for its ability to participate in phosphorylation-mediated translational control in vivo.     

Crystal structure of a minimal eIF4E-Cup complex reveals a general mechanism of eIF4E regulation in translational repression

Cup is an eIF4E-binding protein (4E-BP) that plays a central role in translational regulation of localized mRNAs during early Drosophila development. In particular, Cup is required for repressing translation of the maternally contributed oskar, nanos, and gurken mRNAs, all of which are essential for embryonic body axis determination. Here, we present the 2.8 Å resolution crystal structure of a minimal eIF4E–Cup assembly, consisting of the interacting regions of the two proteins. In the structure, two separate segments of Cup contact two orthogonal faces of eIF4E. The eIF4E-binding consensus motif of Cup (YXXXXLΦ) binds the convex side of eIF4E similarly to the consensus of other eIF4E-binding proteins, such as 4E-BPs and eIF4G. The second, noncanonical, eIF4E-binding site of Cup binds laterally and perpendicularly to the eIF4E β-sheet. Mutations of Cup at this binding site were shown to reduce binding to eIF4E and to promote the destabilization of the associated mRNA. Comparison with the binding mode of eIF4G to eIF4E suggests that Cup and eIF4G binding would be mutually exclusive at both binding sites. This shows how a common molecular surface of eIF4E might recognize different proteins acting at different times in the same pathway. The structure provides insight into the mechanism by which Cup disrupts eIF4E–eIF4G interaction and has broader implications for understanding the role of 4E-BPs in translational regulation.     

Initiation factors eIF4: from sea urchin embryonic development to chronic lymphocytic leukemia

mRNA translation is now recognized as a important regulatory step for gene expression in different physiological and pathophysiological processes including cell proliferation and apoptosis. B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL) is characterized by the accumulation of resting lymphocytes and defective apoptosis. The mRNA cap-binding protein eIF4E (eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4E) and its repressor 4E-BP (eIF4E Binding protein) are crucial translational regulators that have been involved in survival and apoptosis processes of cells. We have shown that the release of eIF4E from its translational repressor 4E-BP is an important event for the first mitotic division triggered by fertilization and that the degradation of 4E-BP is a new means to regulate 4E-BP function that has to be analyzed in other physiological and physiopathological processes. In this chapter, we describe recent advances illustrating the importance of eIF4E and 4E-BP in cancer processes, suggesting that these actors can be targeted for potential therapy against cancer in general and LLC in particular.     

Intracellular translation initiation factor levels in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their role in cap-complex function

Knowledge of the balance of activities of eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) is critical to our understanding of the mechanisms underlying translational control. We have therefore estimated the intracellular levels of 11 eIFs in logarithmically growing cells of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using polyclonal antibodies raised in rabbits against recombinant proteins. Those factors involved in 43S complex formation occur at levels comparable (i.e. within a 0.5- to 2.0-fold range) to those published for ribosomes. In contrast, the subunits of the cap-binding complex eIF4F showed considerable variation in their abundance. The helicase eIF4A was the most abundant eIF of the yeast cell, followed by eIF4E at multiple copies per ribosome, and eIF4B at approximately one copy per ribosome. The adaptor protein eIF4G was the least abundant of the eIF4 factors, with a copy number per cell that is substoichiometric to the ribosome and similar to the abundance of mRNA. The observed excess of eIF4E over its functional partner eIF4G is not strictly required during exponential growth: at eIF4E levels artificially reduced to 30% of those in wild-type yeast, growth rates and the capacity for general protein synthesis are only minimally affected. This demonstrates that eIF4E does not exercise a higher level of rate control over translation than other eIFs. However, other features of the yeast life cycle, such as the control of cell size, are more sensitive to changes in eIF4E abundance. Overall, these data constitute an important basis for developing a quantitative model of the workings of the eukaryotic translation apparatus.     

Conducting the initiation of protein synthesis: the role of eIF4G

The eukaryotic initiation factor eIF4G is a large modular protein which serves as a docking site for initiation factors and proteins involved in RNA translation. Together with eIF4E and eIF4A, eIF4G constitutes the eIF4F complex which is a key component in promoting ribosome binding to the mRNA. Thus, the central role of eIF4G in initiation makes it a valid target for events aimed at modulating translation. Such events occur during viral infection by picornaviruses and lentiviruses and result in the hijack of the translational machinery through cleavage of eIF4G. Proteolysis of eIF4G is also mediated by caspases during the onset of apoptosis causing inhibition of protein synthesis. We will review the role of eIF4G and protein partners as well as the cellular and viral events that modulate eIF4G activity in the initiation of translation.     

Neuronal BC RNAs cooperate with eIF4B to mediate activity-dependent translational control

In neurons, translational regulation of gene expression has been implicated in the activity-dependent management of synapto-dendritic protein repertoires. However, the fundamentals of stimulus-modulated translational control in neurons remain poorly understood. Here we describe a mechanism in which regulatory brain cytoplasmic (BC) RNAs cooperate with eukaryotic initiation factor 4B (eIF4B) to control translation in a manner that is responsive to neuronal activity. eIF4B is required for the translation of mRNAs with structured 5′ untranslated regions (UTRs), exemplified here by neuronal protein kinase Mζ (PKMζ) mRNA. Upon neuronal stimulation, synapto-dendritic eIF4B is dephosphorylated at serine 406 in a rapid process that is mediated by protein phosphatase 2A. Such dephosphorylation causes a significant decrease in the binding affinity between eIF4B and BC RNA translational repressors, enabling the factor to engage the 40S small ribosomal subunit for translation initiation. BC RNA translational control, mediated via eIF4B phosphorylation status, couples neuronal activity to translational output, and thus provides a mechanistic basis for long-term plastic changes in nerve cells.     

Manipulation of the host translation initiation complex eIF4F by DNA viruses

In the absence of their own translational machinery, all viruses must gain access to host cell ribosomes to synthesize viral proteins and replicate. Ribosome recruitment and scanning of capped host mRNAs is facilitated by the multisubunit eIF (eukaryotic initiation factor) 4F, which consists of a cap-binding protein, eIF4E and an RNA helicase, eIF4A, assembled on a large scaffolding protein, eIF4G. Although inactivated by many viruses to inhibit host translation, a growing number of DNA viruses are being found to employ diverse strategies to stimulate eIF4F activity in infected cells and maximize viral protein synthesis. These strategies include stimulation of cellular mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) signalling to inactivate 4E-BPs (eIF4E-binding proteins), a family of translational repressors that limit eIF4E availability and eIF4F complex formation, together with modulating the activity of the eIF4E kinase Mnk (mitogen-activated protein kinase signal-integrating kinase) in a variety of manners to regulate both host and viral mRNA translation. In some cases, specific viral proteins that mediate these signalling events have been identified, whereas others have been shown to interact with host translation initiation factors or complexes and modify their activity and/or subcellular localization. The present review outlines current understanding of the role of eIF4F in the life cycle of various DNA viruses and discusses its potential as a therapeutic target to suppress viral infection.