Stimulus sequence effects on human express saccades described by a Markov model

Express saccades predominantly occur in experiments employing the gap paradigm where the target onset is separated from the fixation point offset by a blank period. Their relative frequency is distinctly influenced by catch trials (i.e. trials without a saccadic target) mixed into the stream of regular target trials. Generalizing this concept for other stimulus uncertainties (direction, amplitude), we found that the preparation time of a saccade depends on both the type of uncertainty used and the sequence of trial type (e.g., target vs catch, left vs right) in the experiment. This stimulus sequence effect is most prominent for catch trials. A similar but less pronounced effect can still be observed in the case of direction uncertainty but not in that of amplitude uncertainty. A two-state Markov process model is proposed which is based on the dichotomy of express and regular saccades in the gap paradigm. According to this model the actual state of the saccadic system, which determines the type of saccade just in preparation, depends on the "trial history". The implications for models of saccade programming are discussed. Received: 14 April 1993/Accepted in revised form: 2 July 1993     

Saccade latency during probability presentation of the visual targets in man

The latent periods of saccadic eye movements in response to peripheral visual stimuli were measured in 8 right-handed healthy subjects using Posner's paradigm "COST-BENEFIT". In 6 subjects, the saccade latency in response to visual target presented in expected location in valid condition was shorter than that in neutral condition ("benefit"). Increase in saccade latency in response to the visual target presented in unexpected location in valid condition versus neutral condition took place only in 4 subjects ("cost"). A decrease in left-directed saccade latency in response to expected target presented in the left hemifield and increase in saccade latency in response to unexpected left target in comparison with analogous right-directed saccades were observed in valid condition. This phenomenon can be explained by the dominance of the right hemisphere in the processes of spatial orientation and "disengage" of attention.     

Mechanisms of Elementary Eye Movements as a Tracking System

In the study of eye-movement mechanisms, the most prevalent hypotheses are those that explain these mechanisms as a programmed system. The assumption is that before the eye accomplishes any movement, a program must be constituted in a control center to define the characteristics of the movement. It is claimed that programming governs all aspects of the oculomotor system: those determining the path of the gaze, that is, the route followed in observing objects, and those controlling elementary movements. For example, it is assumed that before the eye makes a saccade from one fixation point to another, a program should already have been compiled defining the direction, amplitude, and speed of this signal. This program is formed in the latency period preceding the saccade.     

Load changes in limbs during orienting in non-restrained cats

We simultaneously investigated eye and head movements and postural adjustment during orienting by measuring load force exerted by four limbs in cats. When light is moved from the fixation point to the target position, the head first begins moving towards the target position, and the eye moves in the opposite direction due to the vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). Later, the eye moves quickly in the target direction by saccade, synchronous with the remaining rapid head orientation movement. Head movement is classified as either 'head rotation' or 'head translation'. During head rotation, the load force in ipsilateral limb to the target position decreased, and that in the contralateral limb increased. During head translation, on the contrary, load force in the ipsilateral limb increased and that in the contralateral limb decreased. This phenomenon was observed in fore- and hindlimbs. The latencies of head movement are very similar with those of the load force change in many trials, and in case in which the head movement has short latency, the amount of load force change is larger. In contrast, when head movement has long latency, the amount of load force change is smaller. In a previous study, we recorded two types of neurons from ponto-medullary reticular formation. The firing of these neurons was related with head movement. The cervical reticulospinal neuron (C-RSN) in ponto-medullary reticular formation got off collateral to both neck and forelimb motoneurons. These types were named phasic neuron (PN) and phasic sustained neuron (PSN). We discuss the relation between load changes and the two types of neurons and postural adjustment during orienting.     

Distinct control of initiation and metrics of memory-guided saccades and vergence by the FEF: a TMS study

Background

The initiation of memory guided saccades is known to be controlled by the frontal eye field (FEF). Recent physiological studies showed the existence of an area close to FEF that controls also vergence initiation and execution. This study is to explore the effect of transcranial magnetic simulation (TMS) over FEF on the control of memory-guided saccade-vergence eye movements.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Subjects had to make an eye movement in dark towards a target flashed 1 sec earlier (memory delay); the location of the target relative to fixation point was such as to require either a vergence along the median plane, or a saccade, or a saccade with vergence; trials were interleaved. Single pulse TMS was applied on the left or right FEF; it was delivered at 100 ms after the end of memory delay, i.e. extinction of fixation LED that was the “go” signal. Twelve healthy subjects participated in the study. TMS of left or right FEF prolonged the latency of all types of eye movements; the increase varied from 21 to 56 ms and was particularly strong for the divergence movements. This indicates that FEF is involved in the initiation of all types of memory guided movement in the 3D space. TMS of the FEF also altered the accuracy but only for leftward saccades combined with either convergence or divergence; intrasaccadic vergence also increased after TMS of the FEF.

Conclusions/Significance

The results suggest anisotropy in the quality of space memory and are discussed in the context of other known perceptual motor anisotropies.     

Predictive adjustment of the perceived direction of gaze during saccadic eye movements

When we look at a stationary object, the perceived direction of gaze (where we are looking) is aligned with the physical direction of eyes (where our eyes are oriented) by which the object is foveated. However, this alignment may not hold in a dynamic situation. Our experiments assessed the perceived locations of two brief stimuli (1 ms) simultaneously displayed at two different physical locations during a saccade. The first stimulus was in the instantaneous location to which the eyes were oriented and the second one was always in the same location as the initial fixation point. When the timing of these stimuli was changed intra-saccadically, their perceived locations were dissociated. The first stimuli were consistently perceived near the target that will be foveated at saccade termination. The second stimuli once perceived near the target location, shifted in the direction opposite to that of saccades, as its latency from saccades increased. These results suggested an independent adjustment of gaze orientation from the physical orientation of eyes during saccades. The spatial dissociation of two stimuli may reflect sensorimotor control of gaze during saccades.     

Human fast negative EEG potentials before express saccades

Fast negative EEG potentials preceding fast regular saccades and express saccades were studied by the method of backward averaging under conditions of monocular stimulation of the right and left eye. "Step" and "gap" experimental paradigms were used for visual stimulation. Analysis of parameters of potentials and their spatiotemporal dynamics suggests that, under conditions of the increased attention and optimal readiness of the neural structures, express saccades appear when the previously chosen program of the future eye movement coincides with the actual target coordinates. We assumed that the saccade latency decreases at the expense of the involvement of the main oculomotor areas of motor and saccadic planning in its initiation; an express saccade can be initiated also by means of direct transmission of the signal from the cortex to the brainstem saccadic generator passing by the superior colliculus. Moreover, anticipating release from the central fixation and attention distraction are necessary for the successful initiation of an express saccade.     

Positive potentials of the human brain at different stages of preparation of a visually triggered saccade

The EEG of 10 right-handed subjects preceding saccades with mean values of latent periods were selected and averaged. Two standard paradigms of presentation of visual stimuli (central fixation stimulus-peripheral target succession): with a 200-ms inerstimulus interval (GAP) and successive single step (SS). During the period of central fixation, two kinds of positive potentials were observed: fast potentials of "inermediate" positivity (IP) developing 600-400 ms prior to saccade onset and fast potentials of "leading" positivity (LP), which immediately preceded the offset of the central fixation stimulus. Peak latency of the LP potentials was 300 ms prior to saccade onset in the SS paradigm and 400 ms in the GAP paradigm. These potentials were predominantly recorded in the frontal and frontosagittal cortical areas. Decrease in the latency by 30-50 ms in the GAP paradigm was associated with more pronounced positive potentials during the fixation period and absence of the initiation potential P-1' (or decrease in its amplitude). The obtained evidence suggest that the fast positive presaccadic potentials are of a complex nature related to attention, anticipation, motor preparation, decision making, saccadic initiation, and backward afferentation.     

The influence of eye dominance on saccade characteristics and slow presaccadic potentials

Characteristics of saccades and presaccadic slow potentials were studied in 36 right-handed men with right (the RE group) and left (the LE group) eye dominance. Three light-emitting diodes located in the center of the visual field (the central fixation stimulus, CFS) and 10 deg to the left and to the right of the center (peripheral stimuli, PSs) were used for stimulation. The subjects performed a task with simple saccades to a PS and a task with antisaccades to the horizontal mirror position of the PS. Monopolar EEGs at 19 derivations and electrooculograms (EOGs) were recorded. Back averaging of the EEG time-locked to the PS onset or the saccade onset was used to obtain slow presaccadic potentials. The saccade characteristics in the RE and LE groups were similar. Differences between them were found only in the antisaccade task. The amplitude of negative presaccadic potentials (NPPs) time-locked to the PS in the frontal cortex was lower in the LE group compared to the RE group. Analysis of potentials time-locked to the saccade onset showed that changes in the slow potentials during the last 50 s before the saccade depended on the saccade direction and reflected the activation of the hemisphere opposite to the saccade direction. The activation of the right hemisphere before left-side saccades was higher in the LE than the RE group. In addition, the amplitude of NPPs was decreased in the frontal area and increased in the left posterior temporal area in the LE group compared to the RE group. The obtained results indicate that the involvement of the frontal cortex in cognitive and motor processes is decreased in subjects with the left eye dominance.     

Electrical stimulation of the primate lateral habenula suppresses saccadic eye movement through a learning mechanism

The lateral habenula (LHb) is a brain structure which represents negative motivational value. Neurons in the LHb are excited by unpleasant events such as reward omission and aversive stimuli, and transmit these signals to midbrain dopamine neurons which are involved in learning and motivation. However, it remains unclear whether these phasic changes in LHb neuronal activity actually influence animal behavior. To answer this question, we artificially activated the LHb by electrical stimulation while monkeys were performing a visually guided saccade task. In one block of trials, saccades to one fixed direction (e.g., right direction) were followed by electrical stimulation of the LHb while saccades to the other direction (e.g., left direction) were not. The direction-stimulation contingency was reversed in the next block. We found that the post-saccadic stimulation of the LHb increased the latencies of saccades in subsequent trials. Notably, the increase of the latency occurred gradually as the saccade was repeatedly followed by the stimulation, suggesting that the effect of the post-saccadic stimulation was accumulated across trials. LHb stimulation starting before saccades, on the other hand, had no effect on saccade latency. Together with previous studies showing LHb activation by reward omission and aversive stimuli, the present stimulation experiment suggests that LHb activity contributes to learning to suppress actions which lead to unpleasant events.     

Enhanced tactile performance at the destination of an upcoming saccade

Previous work has demonstrated that upcoming saccades influence visual and auditory performance even for stimuli presented before the saccade is executed. These studies suggest a close relationship between saccade generation and visual/auditory attention. Furthermore, they provide support for Rizzolatti et al.'s premotor model of attention, which suggests that the same circuits involved in motor programming are also responsible for shifts in covert orienting (shifting attention without moving the eyes or changing posture). In a series of experiments, we demonstrate that saccade programming also affects tactile perception. Participants made speeded saccades to the left and right side as well as tactile discriminations of up versus down. The first experiment demonstrates that participants were reliably faster at responding to tactile stimuli near the location of upcoming saccades. In our second experiment, we had the subjects cross their hands and demonstrated that the effect occurs in visual space (rather than the early representations of touch). In our third experiment, the tactile events usually occurred on the opposite side of upcoming eye movement. We found that the benefit at the saccade target location vanished, suggesting that this shift is not obligatory but that it may be vetoed on the basis of expectation.     

Contrast dependence of smooth pursuit eye movements following a saccade to superimposed targets

Dorsal stream areas provide motion information used by the oculomotor system to generate pursuit eye movements. Neurons in these areas saturate at low levels of luminance contrast. We therefore hypothesized that during the early phase of pursuit, eye velocity would exhibit an oculomotor gain function that saturates at low luminance contrast. To test this, we recorded eye movements in two macaques trained to saccade to an aperture in which a pattern of dots moved left or right. Shortly after the end of the saccade, the eyes followed the direction of motion with an oculomotor gain that increased with contrast before saturating. The addition of a second pattern of dots, moving in the opposite direction and superimposed on the first, resulted in a rightward shift of the contrast-dependent oculomotor gain function. The magnitude of this shift increased with the contrast of the second pattern of dots. Motion was nulled when the two patterns were equal in contrast. Next, we varied contrast over time. Contrast differences that disappeared before saccade onset biased post-saccadic eye movements at short latency. Changes in contrast occurring during or after saccade termination did not influence eye movements for approximately 150 ms. Earlier studies found that eye movements can be explained by a vector average computation when both targets are equal in contrast. We suggest that this averaging computation may reflect a special case of divisive normalization, yielding saturating contrast response functions that shift to the right with opposed motion, averaging motions when targets are equated in contrast.     

The Frontal Eye Field Is Involved in Visual Vector Inversion in Humans – A Theta Burst Stimulation Study

In the antisaccade task, subjects are requested to suppress a reflexive saccade towards a visual target and to perform a saccade towards the opposite side. In addition, in order to reproduce an accurate saccadic amplitude, the visual saccade vector (i.e., the distance between a central fixation point and the peripheral target) must be exactly inverted from one visual hemifield to the other. Results from recent studies using a correlational approach (i.e., fMRI, MEG) suggest that not only the posterior parietal cortex (PPC) but also the frontal eye field (FEF) might play an important role in such a visual vector inversion process. In order to assess whether the FEF contributes to visual vector inversion, we applied an interference approach with continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) during a memory-guided antisaccade task. In 10 healthy subjects, one train of cTBS was applied over the right FEF prior to a memory-guided antisaccade task. In comparison to the performance without stimulation or with sham stimulation, cTBS over the right FEF induced a hypometric gain for rightward but not leftward antisaccades. These results obtained with an interference approach confirm that the FEF is also involved in the process of visual vector inversion.     

Both Lexical and Non-Lexical Characters Are Processed during Saccadic Eye Movements

On average our eyes make 3–5 saccadic movements per second when we read, although their neural mechanism is still unclear. It is generally thought that saccades help redirect the retinal fovea to specific characters and words but that actual discrimination of information only occurs during periods of fixation. Indeed, it has been proposed that there is active and selective suppression of information processing during saccades to avoid experience of blurring due to the high-speed movement. Here, using a paradigm where a string of either lexical (Chinese) or non-lexical (alphabetic) characters are triggered by saccadic eye movements, we show that subjects can discriminate both while making saccadic eye movement. Moreover, discrimination accuracy is significantly better for characters scanned during the saccadic movement to a fixation point than those not scanned beyond it. Our results showed that character information can be processed during the saccade, therefore saccades during reading not only function to redirect the fovea to fixate the next character or word but allow pre-processing of information from the ones adjacent to the fixation locations to help target the next most salient one. In this way saccades can not only promote continuity in reading words but also actively facilitate reading comprehension.     

Saccadic adaptation to moving targets

Saccades are so called ballistic movements which are executed without online visual feedback. After each saccade the saccadic motor plan is modified in response to post-saccadic feedback with the mechanism of saccadic adaptation. The post-saccadic feedback is provided by the retinal position of the target after the saccade. If the target moves after the saccade, gaze may follow the moving target. In that case, the eyes are controlled by the pursuit system, a system that controls smooth eye movements. Although these two systems have in the past been considered as mostly independent, recent lines of research point towards many interactions between them. We were interested in the question if saccade amplitude adaptation is induced when the target moves smoothly after the saccade. Prior studies of saccadic adaptation have considered intra-saccadic target steps as learning signals. In the present study, the intra-saccadic target step of the McLaughlin paradigm of saccadic adaptation was replaced by target movement, and a post-saccadic pursuit of the target. We found that saccadic adaptation occurred in this situation, a further indication of an interaction of the saccadic system and the pursuit system with the aim of optimized eye movements.     

Negative Potentials of the Human Brain Elicited in Saccadic Latency during Stimulation of the Leading and Nonleading Eyes with an Overlap

Fast presaccadic EEG potentials in saccadic latency were studied with the use of inverse averaging during monocular stimulation of the leading or nonleading eye. Two paradigms were followed, with presentation of visual stimuli consecutively or with a 200-ms overlap. Irrespective of the paradigm and the stimulated eye, the negative N ^–1 potential in the interval of 50–20 ms preceding the beginning of the saccade predominated in the hemisphere contralateral to the saccade direction, reflecting the command processes of saccadic initiation. The N ^–2 potential was more pronounced in the case of direct averaging, starting from the stimulus. Its amplitude increased with increasing concentration of attention on the fixation stimulus under the overlap conditions, and its foci predominated in the left hemisphere, in the frontal, central, and parietosagittal regions. Hence, the N ^–2 potential was assumed to reflect spatial perception and attention as initial stages of saccadic programming. The findings testify to the priority of the leading eye both in fixation and in spatial attention.     

Cortical positive potentials in the period of eye fixation prior to saccades and antisaccades

The EEG of 10 right-handed healthy subjects preceding saccade and antisaccade with mean values of latency in the eye fixations period were selected and averaged. The positive potential P2 appearing on the fixation stimuly switching on and slow positive wave following after it were more prominent before antisaccades than normal saccades. Space-temporal analyses of presaccadic potentials showed that right frontal cortex was activated more before antisaccades. These findings suggest that right cortical hemisphere dominate in spatial attention and inhibition of automatic saccades to visual stimuli in the period of antisaccades preparing. During the period of central fixations "intermediate" positivity potentials, developing in 600-400 ms prior to saccade or antisaccade onset, were find out. These potentials were predominantly recorded in the left frontal and frontosagittal cortical areas. The obtained evidence suggest that "intermediate" positive potentials a period related to the process of motor attention, anticipation and decision making in the period of eyes fixation.     

Les antisaccades: données expérimentales et applications cliniques dans la schizophrénie

Oculomotor tasks are now largely used as powerful tools in the analysis of various cognitive processes, such as executive functions involving the frontal lobes. Beyond these tests, the antisaccade task enables the evaluation of an oculomotor inhibitory function mainly controlled by the prefrontal cortex. In this paradigm, a subject is instructed to cancel a reflexive eye movement (called a reflexive saccade), spontaneously triggered towards a visual target of sudden appearance, and, instead, trigger a voluntary saccade in the opposite direction (called an antisaccade). Impairment of this inhibitory function results in a high number of saccades reflexively triggered towards the visual target, i.e. an increased error rate (percentage of non-inhibited reflexive saccades). The neural basis of this test is now well established, and it is recognized that it represents a useful tool for the functional evaluation of the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. It is indeed dramatically impaired in all cerebral disorders that involve this frontal area and, in psychiatry, a large number of studies have shown that it is frequently impaired in people with schizophrenia, even at early stages and independently of clinical symptomatology. It is also impaired, although to a lesser extent, in relatives and is, therefore, considered an endophenotype of the disease. This test is now used in both clinical practice (diagnosis and prognosis) and as a research tool in psychopathology and pharmacology.     

The effect of eye movement on the control of arm movement to a target

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of eye movement on the control of arm movement to a target. Healthy humans flexed the elbow to a stationary target in response to a start tone. Simultaneously, the subject moved the eyes to the target (saccade eye movement), visually tracked a laser point moving with the arm (smooth pursuit eye movement), or gazed at a stationary start point at the midline of the horizontal visual angle (non-eye movement—NEM). Arm movement onset was delayed when saccade eye movement accompanied it. The onset of an electromyographic burst in the biceps muscle and the onset of saccade eye movement were almost simultaneous when both the arm and the eyes moved to the target. Arm movement duration during smooth pursuit eye movement was significantly longer than that during saccade eye movement or NEM. In spite of these findings, amplitudes of motor-evoked potential in the biceps and triceps brachii muscles were not significantly different among the eye movement conditions. These findings indicate that eye movement certainly affects the temporal control of arm movement, but may not affect corticospinal excitability in the arm muscles during arm movement.     

Manipulating intent: evidence for a causal role of the superior colliculus in target selection

The superior colliculus (SC) is well known for its role in the motor control of saccades. Recent work has shown that it also plays a role in the selection of saccades, but a causal role in the process of target selection has not been demonstrated. We applied subthreshold microstimulation to the SC while monkeys performed a task requiring them to select a stimulus as the target for a pursuit or saccade movement. Stimulation increased the proportion of selections toward the stimulus that appeared contralateral to the site of stimulation and also decreased their latencies. For pursuit, this stimulation-induced contralateral response bias was with respect to the initial target location and not the direction of eye movement, demonstrating a causal effect on target choice distinct from any effect on motor preparation. These results show that the SC helps decide the object of the next movement, beyond its traditional responsibility of saccade production.