Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA

We report that two types of stable protein-DNA complexes, or transpososomes, are generated in vitro during the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction. The Type 1 complex is an intermediate in the reaction. Its formation requires a supercoiled mini-Mu donor plasmid, Mu A and HU protein, and Mg2+. In the Type 1 complex the two ends of Mu are held together, creating a figure eight-shaped molecule with two independent topological domains; the Mu sequences remain supercoiled while the vector DNA is relaxed because of nicking. In the presence of Mu B protein, ATP, target DNA, and Mg2+, the Type 1 complex is converted into the protein-associated product of the strand transfer reaction. In this Type 2 complex, the target DNA has been joined to the Mu DNA ends held in the synaptic complex at the center of the figure eight. Supercoils are not required for the latter reaction.     

Transposition of Mu DNA: joining of Mu to target DNA can be uncoupled from cleavage at the ends of Mu

Transposition of Mu involves transfer of the 3' ends of Mu DNA to the 5' ends of a staggered cut in the target DNA. We find that cleavage at the 3' ends of Mu DNA precedes cutting of the target DNA. The resulting nicked species exists as a noncovalent nucleoprotein complex in which the two Mu ends are held together. This cleaved donor complex completes strand transfer when a target DNA, Mu B protein, and ATP are provided. Mu end DNA sequences that have been precisely cut at their 3' ends by a restriction endonuclease, instead of by Mu A protein and HU, are efficiently transferred to a target DNA upon subsequent incubation with Mu A protein, Mu B protein, and ATP. Cleavage of the Mu ends therefore cannot be energetically coupled with joining these ends to a target DNA. We discuss the DNA strand transfer mechanism in view of these results, and propose a model involving direct transfer of the 5' ends of the cut target DNA, from their original partners, to the 3' ends of Mu.     

Stimulation of the Mu A protein-mediated strand cleavage reaction by the Mu B protein, and the requirement of DNA nicking for stable type 1 transpososome formation. In vitro transposition characteristics of mini-Mu plasmids carrying terminal base pair mutations.

We have examined the effects of a T----C point mutation at the terminal nucleotide of the Mu ends in a mini-Mu plasmid on the early steps in the in vitro transposition reaction. These mutations inhibit the introduction of nicks at the Mu ends in a reaction with Mu A, HU, and integration host factor proteins. The presence of the point mutation at either the left end or the right end is sufficient to block the nicking reaction at both ends, indicating that the reaction is normally concerted. Addition of Mu B and ATP, however, dramatically stimulates the reaction of mutant mini-Mu plasmids carrying the mutation at one end but not at both ends. The data suggest that the Mu B protein mediates its effect through direct interaction with Mu A and that Mu B may play a role in an earlier step in the transposition process than previously proposed. In the presence of Mu B, two products are observed with the left end or right end mutant mini-Mu plasmids, a normal protein-DNA intermediate (Type 1 complex) which contains nicks at both Mu ends and an abortive product composed of free relaxed plasmid which is nicked only at the wild-type end. Furthermore, stable protein-DNA complexes characteristic of the first step in the in vitro transposition reaction are not observed in the absence of nicking or when only one end is a nicked; the introduction of nicks at both Mu ends is a prerequisite for stable transpososome assembly.     

MuB protein allosterically activates strand transfer by the transposase of phage Mu.

The MuA and MuB proteins collaborate to mediate efficient transposition of the phage Mu genome into many DNA target sites. MuA (the transposase) carries out all the DNA cleavage and joining steps. MuB stimulates strand transfer by activating the MuA-donor DNA complex through direct protein-protein contact. The C-terminal domain of MuA is required for this MuA-MuB interaction. Activation of strand transfer occurs irrespective of whether MuB is bound to target DNA. When high levels of MuA generate a pool of free MuB (not bound to DNA) or when chemical modification of MuB impairs its ability to bind DNA, MuB still stimulates strand transfer. However, under these conditions, intramolecular target sites are used exclusively because of their close proximity to the MuA-MuB-donor DNA complex.     

Flanking host sequences can exert an inhibitory effect on the cleavage step of the in vitro mu DNA strand transfer reaction.

The effect of flanking host sequences on the cleavage step of the in vitro Mu DNA strand transfer reaction was investigated. Insertion of a mini-Mu molecule into certain sites in pUC19 results in insertions that demonstrate a decreased ability to form Type 1 complexes in subsequent rounds of transposition. Similarly, changes in the flanking host sequences directly adjacent to the Mu ends by in vitro mutagenesis can also result in Type 1-deficient mini-Mu molecules. Further examination of the inhibition revealed that Type 1 deficient mini-Mu molecules are capable of forming uncut synaptic complexes at normal levels but are compromised in their ability to serve as substrates for phosphodiester bond hydrolysis at the Mu ends. This cleavage defect can be overcome by addition of the Mu B protein and ATP to the reaction. Our data suggest that one of the roles of the B protein may be to provide a mechanism whereby Mu prophages with inhibitory flanking sequences can overcome this obstacle and avoid being trapped at unproductive locations.     

Immunoelectron microscopic analysis of the A, B, and HU protein content of bacteriophage Mu transpososomes

Stable protein-DNA complexes or transpososomes mediate the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction in vitro (Surette, M. G., Buch, S. J., and Chaconas, G. (1987) Cell 49, 253-262; Craigie, R., and Mizuuchi, K. (1987) Cell 51, 493-501). Formation of the Type 1 complex, an intermediate in the strand transfer reaction, requires the Mu A and Escherichia coli HU proteins. Generation of the Type 2 complex, in which the Mu ends have been covalently linked to the target DNA, requires the Mu B protein, ATP, and target DNA in addition to A and HU. The protein content of these higher order synaptic complexes has been studied by immunoelectron microscopy using protein A-colloidal gold conjugates to visualize antibody-bound complexes. Under our in vitro transposition conditions, Type 1 complexes were found to contain A and HU; in addition, Type 2 complexes contained Mu B. However, both the HU and the Mu B protein were found to be loosely associated and could be quantitatively removed from the nucleoprotein core of both complexes by incubation in 0.5 M NaCl. Depletion of HU from the Type 1 complex did not affect the ability of this complex to be converted into the strand-transferred product. Hence, the indispensable role of the HU protein in the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction is limited to the formation of the Type 1 transpososome.     

Two mutations of phage mu transposase that affect strand transfer or interactions with B protein lie in distinct polypeptide domains.

Two mutations within the transposase (the A protein) gene of phage Mu with distinct effects on DNA transposition have been studied. The first mutation maps to the central domain (domain II) of A, a protein consisting of three major structural domains. The variant protein is normal in synapsis and cleavage of Mu ends but is temperature-sensitive in the strand transfer reaction, joining the Mu ends to target DNA. The second mutation is a deletion at the C terminus (within domain III); on the basis of genetic studies, the mutant protein is predicted to have lost the ability to interact with the Mu B protein. The B protein, in conjunction with A, promotes efficient intermolecular transposition, while inhibiting intramolecular transposition. We show that the purified mutant protein is proficient in intramolecular, but not intermolecular transposition in vitro. The interactions between A and B proteins have been followed by a proteolysis assay. The chymotrypsin sensitivity of the interdomainal Phe221-Ser222 peptide bond within the bidomainally organized B protein is exquisitely modulated by ATP, DNA and A protein. The sensitive or "open" state of this bond in native B protein becomes partially "open" upon binding of ATP by B, attains a "closed" or resistant configuration upon binding of DNA in presence of ATP, and is rendered "open" again upon addition of the A protein. In this test for the interaction of A protein with B protein-DNA complex, the domain II mutant behaves like wild-type A protein. However, the domain III mutant fails to restore chymotrypsin susceptibility of the Phe221-Ser222 bond.     

Target immunity of Mu transposition reflects a differential distribution of Mu B protein

A DNA molecule carrying Mu end DNA sequence(s) is a poor target in the Mu DNA strand-transfer reaction, a phenomenon which is referred to as "target immunity." We find that Mu B protein stimulates intermolecular strand-transfer by binding to the target DNA. Our results show that a differential distribution of Mu B protein between "immune" and "non-immune" DNA molecules is responsible for target immunity; in the presence of Mu A protein and ATP, Mu B protein dissociates preferentially from immune DNA molecules. Hydrolysis of ATP is implicated in establishing the differential distribution of Mu B protein between immune and non-immune DNA molecules in the presence of Mu A protein; nonhydrolyzable ATP gamma S can support an efficient strand-transfer reaction even with a target DNA that is immune in a reaction with ATP.     

ClpX protein of Escherichia coli activates bacteriophage Mu transposase in the strand transfer complex for initiation of Mu DNA synthesis.

During transposition bacteriophage Mu transposase (MuA) catalyzes the transfer of a DNA strand at each Mu end to target DNA and then remains tightly bound to the Mu ends. Initiation of Mu DNA replication on the resulting strand transfer complex (STC1) requires specific host replication proteins and host factors from two partially purified enzyme fractions designated Mu replication factors alpha and beta (MRFalpha and beta). Escherichia coli ClpX protein, a molecular chaperone, is a component required for MRFalpha activity, which removes MuA from DNA for the establishment of a Mu replication fork. ClpX protein alters the conformation of DNA-bound MuA and converts STC1 to a less stable form (STC2). One or more additional components of MRFalpha (MRFalpha2) displace MuA from STC2 to form a nucleoprotein complex (STC3), that requires the specific replication proteins and MRFbeta for Mu DNA synthesis. MuA present in STC2 is essential for its conversion to STC3. If MuA is removed from STC2, Mu DNA synthesis no longer requires MRFalpha2, MRFbeta and the specific replication proteins. These results indicate that ClpX protein activates MuA in STC1 so that it can recruit crucial host factors needed to initiate Mu DNA synthesis by specific replication enzymes.     

Structure-function relationships in the transposition protein B of bacteriophage Mu

The B-protein of phage Mu, which is required for high frequency intermolecular transposition in vivo, shows ATPase activity in vitro, binds nonspecifically to DNA, and stimulates intermolecular strand transfer. To elucidate the structural bases for B-protein function, it was subjected to limited proteolysis with two different proteases, trypsin and chymotrypsin. The resulting fragments were mapped by amino acid sequencing. These data show that the B-protein is organized in two domains: an amino-terminal domain of 25 kDa and a carboxyl-terminal domain of 8-kDa. A fragment analogous to the amino-terminal domain, produced by deleting the 3' end of a cloned B gene, proved to be insoluble and had to be renatured after elution from a sodium dodecyl sulfate gel. The renatured protein retains ATP-binding activity and to a lesser extent the DNA-binding activity of the MuB protein, but is unable to hydrolyze ATP or function in transposition. We also show in this study that efficient DNA-strand transfer by the B-protein occurs even in the absence of a detectable ATPase activity or in the presence of adenosine 5'-O-(thio)triphosphate (ATP gamma S).     

Inversion of the phosphate chirality at the target site of Mu DNA strand transfer: evidence for a one-step transesterification mechanism.

Central to transposition of phage Mu are two reactions mediated by the MuA protein. First, MuA introduces single-stranded cuts at the ends of the Mu DNA to generate 3' OH termini. In the subsequent strand-transfer step, the MuA-Mu DNA end complex cuts a target DNA and joins the Mu 3' ends to the 5' ends of the target. DNA containing chiral phosphorothioates was used to demonstrate inversion of the chirality during the course of strand transfer. This result strongly supports a one-step transesterification mechanism in which the 3' OH of the cleaved donor DNA is the attacking nucleophile. Furthermore, this donor 3' OH group was essential for target DNA cleavage. In contrast, during lambda integration the phosphate chirality was retained, as expected for a two-step transesterification involving a covalent protein-DNA intermediate.     

Reorganization of the Mu transpososome active sites during a cooperative transition between DNA cleavage and joining

Transposition of mobile genetic elements proceeds through a series of DNA phosphoryl transfer reactions, with multiple reaction steps catalyzed by the same set of active site residues. Mu transposase repeatedly utilizes the same active site DDE residues to cleave and join a single DNA strand at each transposon end to a new, distant DNA location (the target DNA). To better understand how DNA is manipulated within the Mu transposase-DNA complex during recombination, the impact of the DNA immediately adjacent to the Mu DNA ends (the flanking DNA) on the progress of transposition was investigated. We show that, in the absence of the MuB activator, the 3 '-flanking strand can slow one or more steps between DNA cleavage and joining. The presence of this flanking DNA strand in just one active site slows the joining step in both active sites. Further evidence suggests that this slow step is not due to a change in the affinity of the transpososome for the target DNA. Finally, we demonstrate that MuB activates transposition by stimulating the reaction step between cleavage and joining that is otherwise slowed by this flanking DNA strand. Based on these results, we propose that the 3 '-flanking DNA strand must be removed from, or shifted within, both active sites after the cleavage step; this movement is coupled to a conformational change within the transpososome that properly positions the target DNA simultaneously within both active sites and thereby permits joining.     

Effect of mutations in the C-terminal domain of Mu B on DNA binding and interactions with Mu A transposase

Bacteriophage Mu transposition requires two phage-encoded proteins, the transposase, Mu A, and an accessory protein, Mu B. Mu B is an ATP-dependent DNA-binding protein that is required for target capture and target immunity and is an allosteric activator of transpososome function. The recent NMR structure of the C-terminal domain of Mu B (Mu B223-312) revealed that there is a patch of positively charged residues on the solvent-exposed surface. This patch may be responsible for the nonspecific DNA binding activity displayed by the purified Mu B223-312 peptide. We show that mutations of three lysine residues within this patch completely abolish nonspecific DNA binding of the C-terminal peptide (Mu B223- 312). To determine how this DNA binding activity affects transposition we mutated these lysine residues in the full-length protein. The full-length protein carrying all three mutations was deficient in both strand transfer and allosteric activation of transpososome function but retained ATPase activity. Peptide binding studies also revealed that this patch of basic residues within the C-terminal domain of Mu B is within a region of the protein that interacts directly with Mu A. Thus, we conclude that this protein segment contributes to both DNA binding and protein-protein contacts with the Mu transposase.     

DNA-protein complexes during attachment-site synapsis in Mu DNA transposition.

Initial events in Mu DNA transposition involve specific recognition of Mu DNA ends (att sites) and an internal enhancer site by the Mu transposase (A protein). This interaction between A protein and Mu DNA sequences present on a supercoiled DNA substrate leads to the formation of a stable synaptic complex in which the att ends are nicked, prior to DNA strand transfer. This study examines the properties of a synaptic complex proficient for DNA transposition. We show that the A protein binds as a monomer to its binding sites, and causes the DNA to bend through approximately 90 degrees at each site. All six att binding sites (three at each Mu end) are occupied by A within the synaptic complex. Three of these sites are loosely held and can be emptied of A upon challenge with heparin. A synaptic complex with only three sites occupied is stable and is fully competent in the subsequent strand-transfer step of transposition.     

The phage Mu transpososome core: DNA requirements for assembly and function.

The two chemical steps of phage Mu transpositional recombination, donor DNA cleavage and strand transfer, take place within higher order protein-DNA complexes called transpososomes. At the core of these complexes is a tetramer of MuA (the transposase), bound to the two ends of the Mu genome. While transpososome assembly normally requires a number of cofactors, under certain conditions only MuA and a short DNA fragment are required. DNA requirements for this process, as well as the stability and activity of the ensuing complexes, were established. The divalent cation normally required for assembly of the stable complex could be omitted if the substrate was prenicked, if the flanking DNA was very short or if the two flanking strands were non-complementary. The presence of a single nucleotide beyond the Mu genome end on the non-cut strand was critical for transpososome stability. Donor cleavage additionally required at least two flanking nucleotides on the strand to be cleaved. The flanking DNA double helix was destabilized, implying distortion of the DNA near the active site. Although donor cleavage required Mg2+, strand transfer took place in the presence of Ca2+ as well, suggesting a conformational difference in the active site for the two chemical steps.     

The Mu transpositional enhancer can function in trans: requirement of the enhancer for synapsis but not strand cleavage.

The phage Mu transpositional enhancer has been previously shown to stimulate the initial rate of the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction by a factor of 100. We now show that the Mu enhancer can function in trans on an unlinked DNA molecule. This activity is greatly facilitated by the presence of a free DNA end proximal to the enhancer element. Function of the enhancer in trans does not alter either the requirement for donor DNA supercoiling or for the two Mu ends to be in their proper orientation on the donor plasmid. An important consequence of these findings is that we have been able to evaluate directly the step in the transposition reaction for which the enhancer is required. We show that the role of the enhancer is limited to promoting productive synapsis; efficient strand cleavage can occur in the absence of the enhancer.     

The same two monomers within a MuA tetramer provide the DDE domains for the strand cleavage and strand transfer steps of transposition.

The chemistry of Mu transposition is executed within a tetrameric form of the Mu transposase (MuA protein). A triad of DDE (Asp, Asp35Glu motif) residues in the central domain of MuA (DDE domain) is essential for both the strand cleavage and strand transfer steps of transposition. Previous studies had suggested that complete Mu transposition requires all four subunits in the MuA tetramer to carry an active DDE domain. Using a mixture of MuA proteins with either wild-type or altered att-DNA binding specificities, we have now designed specific arrangements of MuA subunits carrying the DDE domain. From analysis of the abilities of oriented tetramers to carry out DNA cleavage and strand transfer from supercoiled DNA, a new picture of the disposition of DNA and protein partners during transposition has emerged. For DNA cleavage, two subunits of MuA located at attL1 and attR1 (sites that undergo cleavage) provide DDE residues in trans. The same two subunits contribute DDE residues for strand transfer, also in trans. Thus, only two active DDE+ monomers within the tetramer carry out complete Mu transposition. We also show that when the attR1-R2 arrangement used on supercoiled substrates is tested for cleavage on linear substrates, alternative chemically competent DNA-protein associations are produced, wherein the functional DDE subunits are positioned at R2 rather than at R1.     

A domain sharing model for active site assembly within the Mu A tetramer during transposition: the enhancer may specify domain contributions.

The functional configuration of Mu transposase (A protein) is its tetrameric form. We present here a model for the organization of a functional Mu A tetramer. Within the tetramer, assembly of each of the two active sites for Mu end cleavage requires amino acid contributions from the central and C-terminal domains (domains II and III respectively) of at least two Mu A monomers in a trans configuration. The Mu enhancer is likely to function in this assembly process by specifying the two monomers that provide their C-terminal domains for strand cleavage. The Mu B protein is not required in this step. Each of the two active sites for the strand transfer reaction is also organized by domain sharing (but in the reverse mode) between Mu A monomers; i.e. a donor of domain II (also the recipient of domain III) during cleavage is a recipient of domain II (and the donor of domain III) during strand transfer. The function of the Mu B protein (which is required at the strand transfer step) and that of the enhancer element may be analogous in that their interactions with Mu A (domain III and domain I alpha respectively) promote conformations of Mu A conducive to strand cleavage or strand transfer.     

Evidence for the role of DNA strand passage in the mechanism of action of microcin B17 on DNA gyrase

Microcin B17 (MccB17) is a DNA gyrase poison; in previous work, this bacterial toxin was found to slowly and incompletely inhibit the reactions of supercoiling and relaxation of DNA by gyrase and to stabilize the cleavage complex, depending on the presence of ATP and the DNA topology. We now show that the action of MccB17 on the gyrase ATPase reaction and cleavage complex formation requires a linear DNA fragment of more than 150 base pairs. MccB17 is unable to stimulate the ATPase reaction by stabilizing the weak interactions between short linear DNA fragments (70 base pairs or less) and gyrase, in contrast with the quinolone ciprofloxacin. However, MccB17 can affect the ATP-dependent relaxation of DNA by gyrase lacking its DNA-wrapping or ATPase domains. From these findings, we propose a mode of action of MccB17 requiring a DNA molecule long enough to allow the transport of a segment through the DNA gate of the enzyme. Furthermore, we suggest that MccB17 may trap a transient intermediate state of the gyrase reaction present only during DNA strand passage and enzyme turnover. The proteolytic signature of MccB17 from trypsin treatment of the full enzyme requires DNA and ATP and shows a protection of the C-terminal 47-kDa domain of gyrase, indicating the involvement of this domain in the toxin mode of action and consistent with its proposed role in the mechanism of DNA strand passage. We suggest that the binding site of MccB17 is in the C-terminal domain of GyrB.     

Role of DNA topology in Mu transposition: mechanism of sensing the relative orientation of two DNA segments

DNA strand transfer at the initiation of Mu transposition normally requires a negatively supercoiled transposon donor molecule, containing both ends of Mu in inverted repeat orientation. We propose that the specific relative orientation of the Mu ends is needed only to energetically favor a particular configuration that the ends must adopt in a synaptic complex. The model was tested by constructing special donor DNA substrates that, because of their catenation or knotting, energetically favor this same configuration of the Mu ends, even though they are on separate molecules or in direct repeat orientation. These structures are efficient substrates for the strand transfer reaction, whereas appropriate control structures are not. The result eliminates tracking or protein scaffold models for orientation preference. Several other systems in which the relative orientation of two DNA segments is sensed may utilize the same mechanism.