DNA repair mechanisms in mammalian germ cells

Mammalian germ cells encounter several types of DNA damage. This damage is almost completely repaired in a short?period of time to provide the maintenance of genomic integrity. The main repair mechanisms operating in mammalian germline cells are: nucleotide excision repair (NER), base excision repair (BER), mismatch repair (MMR), DNA double strand break repair (DSBR), and post replication repair (PRR). Currently, there are relatively few publications that summarize basic information and new findings?on DNA repair mechanisms used in mammalian germ cells. In the present article, we review the studies that discuss repair mechanisms operating in the female and male germ cells. We then survey some of the recent discoveries made in this field.     

DNA damage and repair in mammalian cells exposed to p-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid

Tyrosinemia type 1 (HT1) is an autosomal recessive disorder of the tyrosine metabolism in which the fumarylacetoacetate hydrolase enzyme is defective. This disease is clinically heterogeneous and a chronic and acute form is discerned. Characteristic of the chronic form is the development of cellular hepatocarcinoma. Although p-hydroxyphenylpyruvic acid (pHPPA) is used as one of the diagnostic markers of this disease, it was suggested that it is unlikely to be involved in the pathophysiology of HT1 as it is present in other disorders that does not have hepatorenal symptoms. It was the aim of this study to investigate the possible effect of pHPPA on DNA damage and repair in mammalian cells. The comet assay was used to establish the genotoxicity of pHPPA in human peripheral blood lymphocytes and isolated rat hepatocytes after their exposure to pHPPA. At first glance the damage to DNA caused by pHPPA seemed reparable in both cell types, however, after challenging the DNA repair capacity of metabolite-treated cells with treatment with H(2)O(2), a marked impairment in the DNA repair capability of these cells was observed. We suggest that the main effect of pHPPA is the long-term impairment of the DNA repair machinery rather than the direct damage to DNA and that this effect of pHPPA, together with the other characteristic metabolites, e.g., FAA and MAA, causes cellular hepatocarcinoma to develop in the chronic form of HT1.     

Mitochondrial DNA repair of oxidative damage in mammalian cells

Nuclear and mitochondrial DNA are constantly being exposed to damaging agents, from endogenous and exogenous sources. In particular, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are formed at high levels as by-products of the normal metabolism. Upon oxidative attack of DNA many DNA lesions are formed and oxidized bases are generated with high frequency. Mitochondrial DNA has been shown to accumulate high levels of 8-hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine, the product of hydroxylation of guanine at carbon 8, which is a mutagenic lesion. Most of these small base modifications are repaired by the base excision repair (BER) pathway. Despite the initial concept that mitochondria lack DNA repair, experimental evidences now show that mitochondria are very proficient in BER of oxidative DNA damage, and proteins necessary for this pathway have been isolated from mammalian mitochondria. Here, we examine the BER pathway with an emphasis on mtDNA repair. The molecular mechanisms involved in the formation and removal of oxidative damage from mitochondria are discussed. The pivotal role of the OGG1 glycosylase in removal of oxidized guanines from mtDNA will also be examined. Lastly, changes in mtDNA repair during the aging process and possible biological implications are discussed.     

DNA damage recognition during nucleotide excision repair in mammalian cells

For the bulk of mammalian DNA, the core protein factors needed for damage recognition and incision during nucleotide excision repair (NER) are the XPA protein, the heterotrimeric RPA protein, the 6 to 9-subunit TFIIH, the XPC-hHR23B complex, the XPG nuclease, and the ERCC1-XPF nuclease. With varying efficiencies, NER can repair a very wide range of DNA adducts, from bulky helical distortions to subtle modifications on sugar residues. Several of the NER factors have an affinity for damaged DNA. The strongest binding factor appears to be XPC-hHR23B but preferential binding to damage is also a property of XPA, RPA, and components of TFIIH. It appears that in order to be repaired by NER, an adduct in DNA must have two features: it must create a helical distortion, and there must be a change in DNA chemistry. Initial recognition of the distortion is the most likely function for XPC-hHR23B and perhaps XPA and RPA, whereas TFIIH is well-suited to locate the damaged DNA strand by locating altered DNA chemistry that blocks translocation of the XPB and XPD components.     

DNA repair in cells sensitive and resistant to cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II): host cell reactivation of damaged plasmid DNA

cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum(II) (cis-DDP) has a broad clinical application as an effective anticancer drug. However, development of resistance to the cytotoxic effects is a limiting factor. In an attempt to understand the mechanism of resistance, we have employed a host cell reactivation assay of DNA repair using a cis-DDP-damaged plasmid vector. The efficiency of DNA repair was assayed by measuring the activity of an enzyme coded for by the plasmid vector. The plasmid expression vector pRSVcat contains the bacterial gene coding for chloramphenicol acetyltransferase (CAT) in a configuration which permits expression in mammalian cells. The plasmid was transfected into repair-proficient and -deficient Chinese hamster ovary cells, and CAT activity was subsequently measured in cell lysates. In the repair-deficient cells, one cis-DDP adduct per cat gene was sufficient to eliminate expression. An equivalent inhibition of CAT expression in the repair-proficient cells did not occur until about 8 times the amount of damage was introduced into the plasmid. These results implicate DNA intrastrand cross-links as the lesions responsible for the inhibition of CAT expression. This assay was used to investigate the potential role of DNA repair in mediating cis-DDP resistance in murine leukemia L1210 cells. The parent cell line L1210/0 resembled repair-deficient cells in that about one adduct per cat gene eliminated expression. In three resistant L1210 cell lines, 3-6-fold higher levels of damage were required to produce an equivalent inhibition. This did not correlate with the degree of resistance as these cells varied from 10- to 100-fold resistant.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Inducible cellular responses to ultraviolet light irradiation and other mediators of DNA damage in mammalian cells

Summary Both naturally occuring and carcinogen-induced tumors display not only point mutations in cellular oncogenes but also more complex changes in cellular oncogenes and other cellular genes. For this and other reasons, it seems likely that DNA damage in mammalian cells can induce alterations in gene expression that may have both short and long term consequences in the target cell. The purpose of this review is to summarize current available information on inducible responses to UV-irradiation and other mediators of DNA damage in mammalian cells, and to provide some working hypotheses. We have divided these responses into three time frames, immediate (0–12 hours), early (12–48) and late (beyond 48 hours). Immediate responses include the action of DNA repair enzymes, some of which are induced as a consequence of DNA damage, and transient inhibition of DNA synthesis. Within the past few years considerable evidence has accumulated that during this immediate period there is increased expression of certain cellular oncogenes, proteases and proteins whose functions remain to be identified. It is of interest that the expression of some of these genes is also induced by certain growth factors, tumor promoters and heat shock. Alterations in gene expression during the subsequent early period (12–48 hrs.) have not been studied in detail, but it is during this period that one can detect increased replication of several types of viruses in cells that harbor these viruses. We have examined in detail the induction of asynchronous polyoma DNA replication (APR) in a rat fibroblast cell line carrying integrated copies of this DNA. We have obtained evidence that UV-irradiation of these cells leads to the synthesis of a 40 kd protein, within the first 1–24 hrs after irradiation, that binds to a specific sequence TGACAACA in the regulatory region of polyoma DNA. We suggest that this protein acts together with other proteins to induce APR and that this serves as a useful model for understanding the mechanisms responsible for amplification of cellular genes, a phenomenon often seen in malignant tumors. Finally, we discuss how the events occurring during the immediate and early periods following DNA damage might lead to late effects in the target cell that are stable and contribute to the genotype and phenotype of some of the progeny of these cells that are destined to become tumor cells.     

Inhibition of dark repair of ultraviolet damage in DNA by caffeine and 8-chlorocaffeine. Kinetics of inhibition

Summary The inhibition of dark repair by caffeine and 8-chlorocaffeine was investigated by a cellular enzyme kinetics system. The results suggest that the caffeine and 8-chlorocaffeine act by inhibiting the excision enzyme of the dark repair system.This work was supported by National Insitutes of Health Research Grant AI-05340, the University of Kansas Research Fund, and N.I.H. Training Grant 5 T1 GM-73.     

Caffeine, cyclic AMP and postreplication repair of mammalian cell DNA.

The methylxanthines, caffeine and theophylline, inhibit postreplication repair of DNA in mammalian cells. Because they also inhibit cyclic AMP phosphodiesterase, it was thought that there might be some connection between concentrations of cyclic AMP and postreplication repair. We tested this possibility by performing DNA sedimentation experiments with a cyclic AMP-resistant mouse lymphoma cell mutant and its wild-type counterpart. The results show that there is no connection between cellular cyclic AMP concentrations and the rate of postreplication repair. Therefore, it is more likely that caffeine and theophylline inhibit postreplication repair by some other means, such as by binding to DNA.     

Induction and subsequent repair of DNA damage by fast neutrons in cultured mammalian cells

The induction and repair of DNA damage were studied by a DNA unwinding method in mouse L5178Y cells exposed to fast neutrons. DNA lesions induced by fast neutrons were classified into three types from their repair profiles: fast-reparable breaks (T1/2 = 3-5 min), slow-reparable breaks (T1/2 = 70 min), and nonreparable breaks. The repair rates of both fast-reparable and slow-reparable breaks were almost the same as those of corresponding damage induced by low-LET radiation. Neutrons induced a smaller amount of fast-reparable damage, an almost equal amount of slow-reparable damage, and a larger amount of nonreparable damage than those induced by equal doses of gamma rays or X rays. RBEs for fast- and slow-reparable damage were 0.3 and 0.9, respectively. The RBE for nonreparable damage was dose dependent and was 1.4 at the level of 100 breaks/10(12) Da DNA. Among the three types of lesions, only the nonreparable damage levels correlated with the linear-quadratic shape of the survival curves and with the enhanced killing effectiveness of neutrons (RBE = 1.7 at D0).     

Homologous recombination is involved in repair of chromium-induced DNA damage in mammalian cells

Chromium is a potent human carcinogen, probably because of its well-documented genotoxic effects. Chromate (Cr[VI]) causes a wide range of DNA lesions, including DNA crosslinks and strand breaks, presumably due to the direct and indirect effects of DNA oxidation. Homologous recombination repair (HRR) is important for error-free repair of lesions occurring at replication forks. Here, we show that HR deficient cell lines irs1SF and V-C8, deficient in XRCC3 and BRCA2, respectively, are hypersensitive to Cr[VI], implicating this repair pathway in repair of Cr[VI] damage. Furthermore, we find that Cr[VI] causes DNA double-strand breaks and triggers both Rad51 foci formation and induction of HRR. Collectively, these data suggest that HRR is important in repair of Cr[VI]-induced DNA damage. In addition, we find that ERCC1, XRCC1 and DNA-PKcs defective cells are hypersensitive to Cr[VI], indicating that several repair pathways cooperate in repairing Cr[VI]-induced DNA damage.     

Influence of cellular differentiation on ultraviolet induced DNA damage and its repair mechanisms in B. cereus

Susceptibility to UV irradiation of B. cereus BIS-59 spores undergoing germination at various stages-dormant spores to vegetative cell stage and their ability to recover from radiation damage were studied. For a given dose of radiation, the number of spore photoproducts (SPP) formed in the DNA of dormant spores was about 5-times greater than that of thymine dimers (TT) formed in the DNA of vegetative cells. At intermediate stages of the germination cycle, there was a rapid decline in the UV radiation-induced SPP formed in DNA with a concomitant increase in the UV radiation-induced TT formed in DNA. Bacterial spores undergoing germination (up to 3 hr) in the low nutrient medium (0.3% yeast extract) displayed much higher resistance to UV radiation than those germinating in the rich nutrient medium, even though there was no discernible difference under the two incubation conditions in respect of the extent of germination and the time at which the outgrowth stage appeared (3 hr). This was due to the formation TT in the DNA of spores germinating in the low nutrient as compared to that of spores germinating in the rich-nutrient medium. In UV-irradiated dormant spores, SPP formed in the spore DNA did not disappear even after prolonged incubation in the non-germinating medium. However, when the UV-irradiated dormant spores were germinated in low or rich nutrient medium, a significant proportion of SPP in DNA was eliminated. The dormant spores incubated in either of the germinating media for 15 min and then UV-irradiated were capable of eliminating SPP (presumably by monomerization) even by incubation in a non-germinating medium and in the complete absence of protein synthesis (buffer holding recovery), thereby implying that spore-repair enzymes were activated in response to initial's germination. The acquisition of photo-reactivation ability appeared in spores subjected to germination only in the rich-nutrient medium at the outgrowth stage and required de novo synthesis of the required enzymes.     

Molecular mechanisms of DNA damage and repair: progress in plants

Despite stable genomes of all living organisms, they are subject to damage by chemical and physical agents in the environment (e.g., UV and ionizing. radiations, chemical mutagens, fungal and bacterial toxins, etc.) and by free radicals or alkylating agents endogenously generated in metabolism. DNA is also damaged because of errors during its replication. The DNA lesions produced by these damaging agents could be altered base, missing base, mismatch base, deletion or insertion, linked pyrimidines, strand breaks, intra- and inter-strand cross-links. These DNA lesions could be genotoxic or cytotoxic to the cell. Plants are most affected by the UV-B radiation of sunlight, which penetrates and damages their genome by inducing oxidative damage (pyrimidine hydrates) and cross-links (both DNA protein and DNA-DNA) that are responsible for retarding the growth and development. The DNA lesions can be removed by repair, replaced by recombination, or retained, leading to genome instability or mutations or carcinogenesis or cell death. Mostly organisms respond to genome damage by activating a DNA damage response pathway that regulates cell-cycle arrest, apoptosis, and DNA repair pathways. To prevent the harmful effect of DNA damage and maintain the genome integrity, all organisms have developed various strategies to either reverse, excise, or tolerate the persistence of DNA damage products by generating a network of DNA repair mechanisms. A variety of different DNA repair pathways have been reported that include direct reversal, base excision repair, nucleotide excision repair, photoreactivation, bypass, double-strand break repair pathway, and mismatch repair pathway. The direct reversal and photoreactivation require single protein, all the rest of the repair mechanisms utilize multiple proteins to remove or repair the lesions. The base excision repair pathway eliminates single damaged base, while nucleotide excision repair excises a patch of 25- to 32-nucleotide-long oligomer, including the damage. The double-strand break repair utilizes either homologous recombination or nonhomologous endjoining. In plant the latter pathway is more error prone than in other eukaryotes, which could be an important driving force in plant genome evolution. The Arabidopsis genome data indicated that the DNA repair is highly conserved between plants and mammals than within the animal kingdom, perhaps reflecting common factors such as DNA methylation. This review describes all the possible mechanisms of DNA damage and repair in general and an up to date progress in plants. In addition, various types of DNA damage products, free radical production, lipid peroxidation, role of ozone, dessication damage of plant seed, DNA integrity in pollen, and the role of DNA helicases in damage and repair and the repair genes in Arabidopsis genome are also covered in this review.