Occurrence of Listeria species in raw milk and dairy products produced in Northern Ireland.

The overall incidence of Listeria spp. in raw milk samples surveyed was found to be 25.0% (Listeria monocytogenes 15.3%), with the incidence in samples from processing centres 54.0% (L. monocytogenes 33.3%); this was higher than that in samples from dairy farms (Listeria spp. 8.8%; L. monocytogenes 5.3%). The FDA enrichment procedure was much more productive than cold enrichment and Oxford agar was superior to modified McBride agar for isolation of Listeria. Listeria monocytogenes was never isolated by direct plating of raw milk samples on Oxford agar at a detection level of 1.0 cfu/ml. Listeria spp. were isolated from 1 of 95 pasteurized milk samples (L. monocytogenes) and 1 of 33 soft cheese samples (L. seeligeri). Restriction fragment length polymorphism was more useful than sero- or phage-typing for typing of L. monocytogenes strains, and results suggest that specific L. monocytogenes strains may persist in both farm and processing environments.     

Occurrence of Listeria species in raw milk and dairy products produced in Northern Ireland

J. HARVEY AND A. GILMOUR. 1992. The overall incidence of Listeria spp. in raw milk samples surveyed was found to be 25.0% ( Listeria monocytogenes 15.3%), with the incidence in samples from processing centres 54.0% ( L. monocytogenes 33.3%); this was higher than that in samples from dairy farms ( Listeria spp. 8.8% L. monocytogenes 5.3%). The FDA enrichment procedure was much more productive than cold enrichment and Oxford agar was superior to modified McBride agar for isolation of Listeria. Listeria monocytogenes was never isolated by direct plating of raw milk samples on Oxford agar at a detection level of 1.0 cfu/ml. Listeria spp. were isolated from 1 of 95 pasteurized milk samples ( L. monocytogenes ) and 1 of 33 soft cheese samples ( L. seeligeri ). Restriction fragment length polymorphism was more useful than sero- or phage-typing for typing of L. monocytogenes strains, and results suggest that specific L. monocytogenes strains may persist in both farm and processing environments.     

Prevalence and fingerprinting of Listeria monocytogenes strains isolated from raw whole milk in farm bulk tanks and in dairy plant receiving tanks

The incidence of Listeria species in raw whole milk from farm bulk tanks and from raw milk in storage at a Swedish dairy plant was studied. Listeria monocytogenes was found in 1.0% and Listeria innocua was found in 2.3% of the 294 farm bulk tank (farm tank) milk specimens. One farm tank specimen contained 60 CFU of L. monocytogenes ml(-1). L. monocytogenes was detected in 19.6% and L. innocua was detected in 8.5% of the milk specimens from the silo receiving tanks at the dairy (dairy silos). More dairy silo specimens were positive for both Listeria species during winter than during summer. Restriction enzyme analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis were applied to 65 isolates of L. monocytogenes, resulting in 16 different clonal types. Two clonal types were shared by the farm tank milk and the dairy silo milk. All except one clonal type belonged to serovar 1/2a. In the dairy silo milk five clonal types were found more frequently and for a longer period than the others. No Listeria species were found in any other samples from the plant.     

The incidence of Listeria spp. in soft cheeses, butter and raw milk in the province of Bologna

Samples of soft cheese, butter and raw milk were examined for Listeria species. Listeria monocytogenes (serotype 1, haemolytic and virulent for mice) and L. innocua (the only other Listeria sp. isolated) were each found in 2/21 (1.6%) of soft cheese samples. Five per cent of butter samples were contaminated with L. innocua. No Listeria spp. were detected in 40 raw milk samples. The results were compared with similar studies in Italy and abroad.     

The incidence of Listeria spp. in soft cheeses, butter and raw milk in the province of Bologna

Samples of soft cheese, butter and raw milk were examined for Listeria species. Listeria monocytogenes (serotype 1, haemolytic and virulent for mice) and L. innocua (the only other Listeria sp. isolated) were each found in 2/21 (1.6%) of soft cheese samples. Five per cent of butter samples were contaminated with L. innocua . No Listeria spp. were detected in 40 raw milk samples. The results were compared with similar studies in Italy and abroad. and accepted 14 June 1989     

Prevalence and Fingerprinting of Listeria monocytogenes Strains Isolated from Raw Whole Milk in Farm Bulk Tanks and in Dairy Plant Receiving Tanks

The incidence of Listeria species in raw whole milk from farm bulk tanks and from raw milk in storage at a Swedish dairy plant was studied. Listeria monocytogenes was found in 1.0% and Listeria innocua was found in 2.3% of the 294 farm bulk tank (farm tank) milk specimens. One farm tank specimen contained 60 CFU of L. monocytogenes ml⁻¹. L. monocytogenes was detected in 19.6% and L. innocua was detected in 8.5% of the milk specimens from the silo receiving tanks at the dairy (dairy silos). More dairy silo specimens were positive for both Listeria species during winter than during summer. Restriction enzyme analysis and pulsed-field gel electrophoresis were applied to 65 isolates of L. monocytogenes, resulting in 16 different clonal types. Two clonal types were shared by the farm tank milk and the dairy silo milk. All except one clonal type belonged to serovar 1/2a. In the dairy silo milk five clonal types were found more frequently and for a longer period than the others. No Listeria species were found in any other samples from the plant.     

Method for flow cytometric detection of Listeria monocytogenes in milk.

This report describes a method for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk by flow cytometric analysis of fluorescently labeled bacterial populations. The use of immunofluorescence in combination with measures of DNA content by propidium iodide labeling and size by light scattering enabled specific identification of L. monocytogenes from Streptococcus faecalis, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus uberis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus hyicus. Additional specific resolution of L. monocytogenes populations was achieved through selective enrichment of raw milk in Listeria enrichment broth. These procedures should permit the rapid screening of milk and other food samples for L. monocytogenes and eliminate many of the short-comings associated with conventional fluorescent-antibody procedures.     

Method for flow cytometric detection of Listeria monocytogenes in milk

This report describes a method for the detection of Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk by flow cytometric analysis of fluorescently labeled bacterial populations. The use of immunofluorescence in combination with measures of DNA content by propidium iodide labeling and size by light scattering enabled specific identification of L. monocytogenes from Streptococcus faecalis, Streptococcus agalactiae, Streptococcus uberis, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus hyicus. Additional specific resolution of L. monocytogenes populations was achieved through selective enrichment of raw milk in Listeria enrichment broth. These procedures should permit the rapid screening of milk and other food samples for L. monocytogenes and eliminate many of the short-comings associated with conventional fluorescent-antibody procedures.     

Isolation of Listeria monocytogenes from raw milk and its environment at dairy farms in Japan

The incidence of Listeria monocytogenes contamination in raw milk from farm bulk tanks and silage was investigated monthly at 20 dairy farms in Aomori prefecture, Japan, from January to July in 1989. Listeria sp. was isolated from one sample (5%) of raw milk collected in May, but L. monocytogenes was not isolated from raw milk. L. monocytogenes was isolated from two samples of silage (10%) collected in June. Silage, cow feces, sawdust bedding, dust and soil in these farms were tested for listerias, and we confirmed listerias contamination of the environment in the dairy farms.     

A comparative study of the Gene-Trak Listeria assay, the Listeria-Tek ELISA test and the FDA method for the detection of Listeria species in raw milk

A total of 110 raw milk samples were analysed using the Gene-Trak Listeria assay, unmodified and with four modifications to its enrichment procedure, the Listeria-Tek ELISA test and the FDA method. Thirty-five samples yielded confirmed positive results by at least one of the methods tested. The original Gene-Trak protocol yielded 24 confirmed positive results, significantly higher than the 13 obtained with the Listeria-Tek ELISA test or with the FDA method. The modifications to the Gene-Trak Listeria assay did not significantly increase the detection rate of Listeria spp.     

The incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk from farm bulk tanks in north-east Scotland

Over 180 farm bulk milk tanks were tested for the presence of Listeria monocytogenes on three separate occasions which included periods when cows were grazing and confined inside on a silage diet. The incidence of L. monocytogenes contamination was low, ranging from 3.8% in the summer samples to 1.0% in October. The level of contamination was estimated to be lower than one L. monocytogenes bacterium per ml in positive samples, as most required cold enrichment of 10-20 ml volumes before recovery. The distribution was sporadic; only one farm gave positive isolations on all three sampling occasions, one other on two, and all others were from different farms. No correlation between the presence of L. monocytogenes and hygiene standards or the feeding of silage was found.     

The incidence of Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk from farm bulk tanks in North-East Scotland

Over 180 farm bulk milk tanks were tested for the presence of Listeria monocytogenes on three separate occasions which included periods when cows were grazing and confined inside on a silage diet. The incidence of L. monocytogenes contamination was low, ranging from 3.8% in the summer samples to 1.0% in October. The level of contamination was estimated to be lower than one L. monocytogenes bacterium per ml in positive samples, as most required cold enrichment of 10–20 ml volumes before recovery. The distribution was sporadic; only one farm gave positive isolations on all three sampling occasions, one other on two, and all others were from different farms. No correlation between the presence of L. monocytogenes and hygiene standards or the feeding of silage was found.     

Use of PCR methods for identification of Listeria monocytogenes in milk

The aim of this work was to estimate the limit of Listeria monocytogenes cfu in polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for a DNA fragment of listeriolysine O (hly A) gene. The PCR method, with used primers selected in areas of the listeriolysin O gene, allows to differentiate L. monocytogenes strains from other Listeria species. The amplified fragment (456 bp) of hly A gene was obtained for all strains L. monocytogenes and no other Listeria species. The PCR method with the selected primers allowed to detect 50-500 cfu L. monocytogenes/ml suspended in water or milk. Among 20 samples of raw milk from cows, 10 samples contained > 50 cfu L. monocytogenes/ml. Obtained results indicate that the PCR assay of L. monocytogenes identification is technically simple and may be conduct with minimal time. So, it could be recommended as quick diagnostic method in identification L. monocytogenes in milk.     

Comparison of selective and non-selective enrichment media in the detection of Listeria monocytogenes from meat containing Listeria innocua

AIMS: This study investigated whether the higher incidence of recovery from meat of Listeria innocua compared with L. monocytogenes could be due to the laboratory media used, leading to an artificially lower detection of the pathogenic species, L. monocytogenes. METHODS AND RESULTS: Minced beef was inoculated with L. monocytogenes, L. innocua, or a mixture of these species, and stored at 0 or 10 degrees C under vacuum or aerobic conditions for up to 28 days. Listeria were recovered from the minced beef using selective (University of Vermont Medium, UVM) and non-selective (Buffered Peptone Water, BPW) enrichment broths after 0, 14, and 28 days of storage. In general, there were no significant differences (P < 0.05) between the numbers of L. monocytogenes recovered from minced beef samples after 24 h enrichment in BPW and the numbers recovered using UVM. In addition, the presence of L. innocua in meat samples containing L. monocytogenes did not significantly (P < 0.05) affect the numbers of L. monocytogenes recovered using either enrichment broth. In most cases there were no significant differences (P < 0.05) between the numbers of L. innocua recovered from minced beef samples after 24 h enrichment in BPW compared with numbers recovered using UVM. CONCLUSION: Listeria innocua was found to have no significant competitive advantage over L. monocytogenes in selective or non-selective enrichment media. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: The results suggest that, in some instances, the use of a selective enrichment broth offers no advantage over a non-selective enrichment broth for the recovery of Listeria species from minced beef.     

Evaluation of chromogenic media for the detection of Listeria species in food

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of chromogenic agars, Agar Listeria according to Ottaviani and Agosti (ALOA) and Rapid L. mono agar, compared with Oxford agar for the enumeration and detection of Listeria species in food. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 170 food samples were examined using the three plating media. Listeria species were isolated from 63 samples. In contrast to Oxford agar, detection of Listeria colonies on chromogenic media was as good after 24 h of incubation of plates as after 48 h. While there was no significant difference in recovery of Listeria monocytogenes on the three media, recovery of other Listeria species was significantly poorer on Rapid L. mono agar compared with Oxford and ALOA agars. Recovery of species other than L. monocytogenes was significantly improved by including a secondary enrichment stage in the detection method. CONCLUSIONS: Using chromogenic agars, presumptive identification of L. monocytogenes is possible after 24 h, compared with 3-4 days using Oxford agar. However, the poor detection of species other than L. monocytogenes on Rapid L. mono agar is a disadvantage of this medium. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: This study provides new information regarding the isolation of Listeria species other than L. monocytogenes from food using chromogenic plating media. This is important, as non-pathogenic Listeria species act as markers for the likelihood of presence of L. monocytogenes and allow preventive action to be taken to avoid its presence.     

Survival of Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk treated in a pilot plant size pasteurizer

The survival of Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk treated in a pilot plant size pasteurizer was investigated. Raw milk was inoculated with different initial concentrations of L. monocytogenes and heated at temperatures ranging from 69° to 73°C. Listerias were not isolated from any of the milk samples immediately after thermal treatment. They were isolated, however, from 46.6% of heated samples (none from samples heated at 73°C) after variable periods at refrigeration temperature. The results suggest that a low number of listerias survive some thermal treatments, but a cold enrichment is necessary to repair the thermally injured cells and detect these organisms in milk. The importance of the isolation technique in the recovery of listerias from pasteurized milk samples is discussed.     

Survival of Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk treated in a pilot plant size pasteurizer

The survival of Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk treated in a pilot plant size pasteurizer was investigated. Raw milk was inoculated with different initial concentrations of L. monocytogenes and heated at temperatures ranging from 69 degrees to 73 degrees C. Listerias were not isolated from any of the milk samples immediately after thermal treatment. They were isolated, however, from 46.6% of heated samples (none from samples heated at 73 degrees C) after variable periods at refrigeration temperature. The results suggest that a low number of listerias survive some thermal treatments, but a cold enrichment is necessary to repair the thermally injured cells and detect these organisms in milk. The importance of the isolation technique in the recovery of listerias from pasteurized milk samples is discussed.     

Incidence of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in a poultry processing environment and in poultry products and their rapid confirmation by multiplex PCR.

The incidence of Listeria spp. and Listeria monocytogenes in a poultry processing plant and in raw and cooked poultry products was determined over a 6-month period. Within the raw and cooked poultry processing environments, 46% (36 of 79) and 29% (51 of 173) of the samples contained Listeria spp. while 26% (21 of 79) and 15% (27 of 173) contained L. monocytogenes, respectively. Various sites within the processing environment were found to be consistently positive for L. monocytogenes throughout the entire sampling period. Of the raw and cooked products tested, 91% (53 of 58) and 8% (8 of 96) were found to contain Listeria spp. while 59% (34 of 58) and 0% (0 of 96) contained L. monocytogenes, respectively. Although L. monocytogenes was not detected in the cooked products examined, the presence of other Listeria spp. highlights the potential which exists for postprocessing contamination. Multiplex PCR proved to be a convenient and time-saving technique for rapid confirmation of Listeria spp. and L. monocytogenes in a single reaction.     

Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk

Enumeration of Listeria monocytogenes in raw milk was compared by direct plating and Most Probable Number (MPN) techniques involving both direct and two-stage enrichments. Direct plating was found to lack sensitivity for the enumeration of low numbers of listerias found in milk but an MPN technique with direct selective enrichment was found to be more suitable than one with two-stage enrichment.     

Listeria species in a California coast estuarine environment.

Listeria species and L. monocytogenes were found in 81 and 62%, respectively, of fresh or low-salinity waters (37 samples) in tributaries draining into Humboldt-Arcata Bay, Calif., during a winter (January-February) sampling period. The incidence of Listeria species and L. monocytogenes in sediment (46 samples) from the same sites where water was sampled was 30.4 and 17.4%, respectively. One of three bay water samples contained Listeria species (including L. monocytogenes), while of 35 samples of oysters examined, only 1 was found positive for Listeria species (L. innocua). A given species or L. monocytogenes serogroup appeared to predominate in fresh water when domesticated animals (cows, horses) were nearby, whereas greater variety with no species predominance was observed in areas with no direct animal influence.