Circadian and Acamprosate Modulation of Elevated Ethanol Drinking in mPer2 Clock Gene Mutant Mice

The PER2 clock gene modulates ethanol consumption, such that mutant mice not expressing functional mPer2 have altered circadian behavior that promotes higher ethanol intake and preference. Experiments were undertaken to characterize circadian-related behavioral effects of mPer2 deletion on ethanol intake and to explore how acamprosate (used to reduce alcohol dependence) alters diurnal patterns of ethanol intake. Male mPer2 mutant and WT (wild-type) mice were entrained to a 12:12?h light-dark (12L:12D) photocycle, and their locomotor and drinking activities were recorded. Circadian locomotor measurements confirmed that mPer2 mutants had an advanced onset of nocturnal activity of about 2?h relative to WTs, and an increased duration of nocturnal activity (p < .01). Also, mPer2 mutants preferred and consumed more ethanol and had more daily ethanol drinking episodes vs. WTs. Measurements of systemic ethanol using subcutaneous microdialysis confirmed the advanced rise in ethanol intake in the mPer2 mutants, with 24-h averages being ～60 vs. ～25?mM for WTs (p < .01). A 6-day regimen of single intraperitoneal (i.p.) acamprosate injections (300?mg/kg) at zeitgeber time (ZT) 10 did not alter the earlier onset of nocturnal ethanol drinking in the mPer2 mutants, but reduced the overall amplitude of drinking and preference (both p < .01). Acamprosate also reduced these parameters in WTs. These results suggest that elevated ethanol intake in mPer2 mutants may be a partial consequence of an earlier nighttime activity onset and increase in nocturnal drinking activity. The suppressive action of acamprosate on ethanol intake is not due to an altered diurnal pattern of drinking, but rather a decrease in the number of daily drinking bouts and amount of drinking per bout. (Author correspondence: jglass@kent.edu)     

Acamprosate-responsive brain sites for suppression of ethanol intake and preference

Acamprosate suppresses alcohol intake and craving in recovering alcoholics; however, the central sites of its action are unclear. To approach this question, brain regions responsive to acamprosate were mapped using acamprosate microimplants targeted to brain reward and circadian areas implicated in alcohol dependence. mPer2 mutant mice with nonfunctional mPer2, a circadian clock gene that gates endogenous timekeeping, were included, owing to their high levels of ethanol intake and preference. Male wild-type (WT) and mPer2 mutant mice received free-choice (15%) ethanol/water for 3 wk. The ethanol was withdrawn for 3 wk and then reintroduced to facilitate relapse. Four days before ethanol reintroduction, mice received bilateral blank or acamprosate-containing microimplants releasing ～50 ng/day into reward [ventral tegmental (VTA), peduculopontine tegmentum (PPT), and nucleus accumbens (NA)] and circadian [intergeniculate leaflet (IGL) and suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN)] areas. The hippocampus was also targeted. Circadian locomotor activity was measured throughout. Ethanol intake and preference were greater in mPer2 mutants than in wild-type (WT) mice (27 g·kg(-1)·day(-1) vs. 13 g·kg(-1)·day(-1) and 70% vs. 50%, respectively; both, P < 0.05). In WTs, acamprosate in all areas, except hippocampus, suppressed ethanol intake and preference (by 40-60%) during ethanol reintroduction. In mPer2 mutants, acamprosate in the VTA, PPT, and SCN suppressed ethanol intake and preference by 20-30%. These data are evidence that acamprosate's suppression of ethanol intake and preference are manifest through actions within major reward and circadian sites.     

Cycle of period gene expression in a diurnal mammal (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus): implications for nonphotic phase shifting.

Ground squirrels, Spermophilus tridecemlineatus, were kept in a 12:12 h light-dark cycle. As expected for a diurnal species, their locomotor activity occurred almost entirely in the daytime. Expression of mPer1 and mPer2 in the suprachiasmatic nucleus was studied at six time points by in situ hybridization. For both these genes, mRNA was highest in the first part of the subjective day (about zeitgeber time 5). This is close to the time when mPer1 and mPer2 expression is maximal in nocturnal rodents. These results have implications for understanding nonphotic phase response curves in diurnal species and thereby for guiding research on nonphotic phase shifting in people.     

Photic phase response curve in Octodon degus: assessment as a function of activity phase preference

Light exposure during the early and late subjective night generally phase delays and advances circadian rhythms, respectively. However, this generality was recently questioned in a photic entrainment study in Octodon degus. Because degus can invert their activity phase preference from diurnal to nocturnal as a function of activity level, assessment of phase preference is critical for computations of phase reference [circadian time (CT) 0] toward the development of a photic phase response curve. After determining activity phase preference in a 24-h light-dark cycle (LD 12:12), degus were released in constant darkness. In this study, diurnal (n = 5) and nocturnal (n = 7) degus were randomly subjected to 1-h light pulses (30-35 lx) at many circadian phases (CT 1-6: n = 7; CT 7-12: n = 8; CT 13-18: n = 8; and CT 19-24: n = 7). The circadian phase of body temperature (Tb) onset was defined as CT 12 in nocturnal animals. In diurnal animals, CT 0 was determined as Tb onset + 1 h. Light phase delayed and advanced circadian rhythms when delivered during the early (CT 13-16) and late (CT 20-23) subjective night, respectively. No significant phase shifts were observed during the middle of the subjective day (CT 3-10). Thus, regardless of activity phase preference, photic entrainment of the circadian pacemaker in Octodon degus is similar to most other diurnal and nocturnal species, suggesting that entrainment mechanisms do not determine overt diurnal and nocturnal behavior.     

Circadian organization in a diurnal rodent, Arvicanthis ansorgei Thomas 1910: chronotypes, responses to constant lighting conditions, and photoperiodic changes

Little information is available on circadian organization in diurnal mammals. In the present study, the daily patterns of wheel-running activity were described in a diurnal rodent, Arvicanthis ansorgei Thomas 1910, as assessed by karyological analysis. Among 108 animals born in the colony and studied under a 12:12 light-dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 a.m.), the authors determined the timing of daily activity (i.e., mean onsets and offsets of pattern of locomotor activity) and the level of wheel-running activity performed during daytime versus nighttime. The activity pattern was essentially diurnal in 84% of individuals, 46% being active only during the light period +/- 1 h (activity onsets and offsets at 6:20 a.m. and 7:40 p.m., respectively) and 38% being diurnal with a period of nocturnal activity longer than 1 h (activity onsets and offsets at 5:40 a.m. and 9:30 p.m., respectively). Of the 108 animals, 16% expressed a nocturnal activity with diurnal overlaps no longer than 1 h. In 6 diurnal individuals first exposed to constant light and then to constant dim red light, the endogenous period was shortened from 24.6 +/- 0.1 to 24.0 +/- 0.1 h, respectively. The numbers of wheel revolutions per day and during the active period remained unchanged between the two lighting conditions. In response to different photoperiodic changes from 16:08 to 08:16 light-dark cycles, the phase angle of photic synchronization, estimated by the daily onset of wheel-running activity in 6 diurnal animals, showed marked changes, its timing occurring 2 h before and 0.5 h after the onset of light under short and long photoperiods, respectively. The numbers of wheel revolutions per 24 h and during the active period were modified similarly according to photoperiodic changes. Finally, in 5 diurnal animals exposed to a 12:12 light-dark cycle, the daily pattern of general locomotor activity, determined by telemetry, was not modified by wheel availability. The data indicate that A. ansorgei is an interesting experimental model to understand the regulation of the circadian timing system in day-active species.     

Circadian rhythms of self-feeding and locomotor activity in zebrafish (Danio Rerio)

To investigate daily feeding rhythms in zebrafish, the authors have developed a new self-feeding system with an infrared photocell acting as a food-demand sensor, which lets small-size fish such as zebrafish trigger a self-feeder. In this paper, the authors used eight groups of 20 fish. Locomotor activity rhythms were also investigated by means of infrared sensors. Under a 12?h:12?h light (L)-dark (D) cycle, zebrafish showed a clear nocturnal feeding pattern (88.0% of the total daily food-demands occurring in the dark phase), concentrated during the last 4?h of the dark phase. In contrast, locomotor activity was mostly diurnal (88.2% of total daily activity occurring in the light phase). Moreover, both feeding and locomotor rhythms were endogenously driven, as they persisted under free-running conditions. The average period length (τ) of the locomotor and feeding rhythms was shorter (τ?=?22.9?h) and longer (τ?=?24.6?h) than 24?h, respectively. During the time that food availability was restricted, fish could only feed during ZT0-ZT12 or ZT12-ZT16. This resulted in feeding activity being significantly modified according to feeding time, whereas the locomotor activity pattern remained synchronized to the LD cycle and did not change during this trial. These findings revealed an independent phasing between locomotor and feeding activities (which were mostly nocturnal or diurnal, respectively), thus supporting the concept of multioscillatory control of circadian rhythmicity in zebrafish.     

Melatonin effects on food intake and activity rhythms in two fish species with different activity patterns: Diurnal (goldfish) and nocturnal (tench)

Melatonin has several known physiological functions, the main one being synchronization of daily and seasonal rhythms. In addition, melatonin has been reported to influence food intake and behavioral rhythms with varying results depending on the species. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effects of intraperitoneal melatonin injection on food intake and locomotor activity in two different fish species: goldfish (diurnal) and tench (nocturnal), under different light regimes: constant light (LL) conditions or LD 12:12, with melatonin administration at mid-light (ML), mid-dark (MD), and after a 1-h light pulse at MD. In addition to these acute tests, in the case of goldfish we also investigated the effects of daily melatonin administration for 1 week. Our results indicated that acute melatonin administration significantly decreased goldfish food intake (16-52% inhibition, depending on the light regime) and locomotor activity (55-100%), with the chronic treatment inducing a similar total food intake inhibition that persisted for 7 days. In tench, a nocturnal fish species, acute melatonin administration at MD and ML reduced food intake (37% and 29%, respectively), while locomotor activity was not affected at MD and slightly increased at ML. Taken together, these results indicated that melatonin reduced food intake in both species, while its effects on locomotor activity depended on the time of administration (light or dark phase) and the activity patterns of the species.     

Circadian Rhythms of Self-feeding and Locomotor Activity in Zebrafish (Danio Rerio)

To investigate daily feeding rhythms in zebrafish, the authors have developed a new self-feeding system with an infrared photocell acting as a food-demand sensor, which lets small-size fish such as zebrafish trigger a self-feeder. In this paper, the authors used eight groups of 20 fish. Locomotor activity rhythms were also investigated by means of infrared sensors. Under a 12?h:12?h light (L)-dark (D) cycle, zebrafish showed a clear nocturnal feeding pattern (88.0% of the total daily food-demands occurring in the dark phase), concentrated during the last 4?h of the dark phase. In contrast, locomotor activity was mostly diurnal (88.2% of total daily activity occurring in the light phase). Moreover, both feeding and locomotor rhythms were endogenously driven, as they persisted under free-running conditions. The average period length (τ) of the locomotor and feeding rhythms was shorter (τ?=?22.9?h) and longer (τ?=?24.6?h) than 24?h, respectively. During the time that food availability was restricted, fish could only feed during ZT0–ZT12 or ZT12–ZT16. This resulted in feeding activity being significantly modified according to feeding time, whereas the locomotor activity pattern remained synchronized to the LD cycle and did not change during this trial. These findings revealed an independent phasing between locomotor and feeding activities (which were mostly nocturnal or diurnal, respectively), thus supporting the concept of multioscillatory control of circadian rhythmicity in zebrafish. (Author correspondence: javisan@um.es)     

MPer1 and mper2 are essential for normal resetting of the circadian clock

Mammalian Per1 and Per2 genes are involved in the mechanism of the circadian clock and are inducible by light. A light pulse can evoke a change in the onset of wheel-running activity in mice by shifting the onset of activity to earlier times (phase advance) or later times (phase delays) thereby advancing or delaying the clock (clock resetting). To assess the role of mouse Per (mPer) genes in circadian clock resetting, mice carrying mutant mPer1 or mPer2 genes were tested for responses to a light pulse at ZT 14 and ZT 22, respectively. The authors found that mPer1 mutants did not advance and mPer2 mutants did not delay the clock. They conclude that the mammalian Per genes are not only light-responsive components of the circadian oscillator but also are involved in resetting of the circadian clock.     

Activity Rhythms and Masking Response in the Diurnal Fat Sand Rat Under Laboratory Conditions

Daily rhythms are heavily influenced by light in two major ways. One is through photic entrainment of a circadian clock, and the other is through a more direct process, referred to as masking. Whereas entraining effects of photic stimuli are quite similar in nocturnal and diurnal species, masking is very different. Laboratory conditions differ greatly from what is experienced by individuals in their natural habitat, and several studies have shown that activity patterns can greatly differ between laboratory environment and natural condition. This is especially prevalent in diurnal rodents. We studied the daily rhythms and masking response in the fat sand rat (Psammomys obesus), a diurnal desert rodent, and activity rhythms of Tristram’s jird (Meriones tristrami), a nocturnal member of the same subfamily (Gerbillinae). We found that most sand rats kept on a 12?h:12?h light-dark (LD) cycles at two light intensities (500 and 1000?lux) have a nocturnal phase preferences of general activity and higher body temperature during the dark phase. In most individuals, activity was not as stable that of the nocturnal Tritram’s jirds, which showed a clear and stable nocturnal activity pattern under the same conditions. Sand rats responded to a 6-h phase advance and 6-h phase delay as expected, and, under constant conditions, all tested animals free ran. In contrast with the nocturnal phase preference, fat sand rats did not show a masking response to light pulses during the dark phase or to a dark pulse during the light phase. They did, however, have a significant preference to the light phase under a 3.5?h:3.5?h LD schedule. Currently, we could not identify the underlying mechanisms responsible for the temporal niche switch in this species. However, our results provide us with a valuable tool for further studies of the circadian system of diurnal species, and will hopefully lead us to understanding diurnality, its mechanisms, causes, and consequences.     

Opposite effects of tryptophan intake on motor activity in ring doves (diurnal) and rats (nocturnal)

The role of l-tryptophan as precursor of serotonin and melatonin synthesis on activity-rest rhythm was studied in ring doves, Streptopelia risoria, as a representative of diurnal animals and rats, Rattus norvegicus, as a typical nocturnal one. The animals were housed in cages equipped for horizontal activity recording in a thermostatized chamber and submitted to a 12/12h light/dark photoperiod (lights on at 08:00 h). After acclimatization, the animals received vehicle (methylcellulose) and l-tryptophan (240 mg/kg) by esophagic cannula 2h before the onset of either light or dark phase. Also, oral melatonin (2.5mg/kg) was tested for comparative purposes. After nocturnal l-tryptophan administration, rats showed increased activity (149%), while the opposite occurred in ring doves (39% decrease). No significant changes were found after diurnal l-tryptophan intake in either species. Melatonin produced effects similar to those of l-tryptophan. These results suggest that the effects of l-tryptophan administration are dependent on the nocturnal/diurnal habits of the studied species and, most probably, are mediated by increased melatonin synthesis.     

The VPAC(2) receptor is essential for circadian function in the mouse suprachiasmatic nuclei

The neuropeptides pituitary adenylate cyclase-activating polypeptide (PACAP) and vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) are implicated in the photic entrainment of circadian rhythms in the suprachiasmatic nuclei (SCN). We now report that mice carrying a null mutation of the VPAC(2) receptor for VIP and PACAP (Vipr2(-/-)) are incapable of sustaining normal circadian rhythms of rest/activity behavior. These mice also fail to exhibit circadian expression of the core clock genes mPer1, mPer2, and mCry1 and the clock-controlled gene arginine vasopressin (AVP) in the SCN. Moreover, the mutants fail to show acute induction of mPer1 and mPer2 by nocturnal illumination. This study highlights the role of intercellular neuropeptidergic signaling in maintenance of circadian function within the SCN.     

Sleep rhythmicity and homeostasis in mice with targeted disruption of mPeriod genes

In mammals, sleep is regulated by circadian and homeostatic mechanisms. The circadian component, residing in the suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN), regulates the timing of sleep, whereas homeostatic factors determine the amount of sleep. It is believed that these two processes regulating sleep are independent because sleep amount is unchanged after SCN lesions. However, because such lesions necessarily damage neuronal connectivity, it is preferable to investigate this question in a genetic model that overcomes the confounding influence of circadian rhythmicity. Mice with disruption of both mouse Period genes (mPer)1 and mPer2 have a robust diurnal sleep-wake rhythm in an entrained light-dark cycle but lose rhythmicity in a free-run condition. Here, we examine the role of the mPer genes on the rhythmic and homeostatic regulation of sleep. In entrained conditions, when averaged over the 24-h period, there were no significant differences in waking, slow-wave sleep (SWS), or rapid eye movement (REM) sleep between mPer1, mPer2, mPer3, mPer1-mPer2 double-mutant, and wild-type mice. The mice were then kept awake for 6 h (light period 6-12), and the mPer mutants exhibited increased sleep drive, indicating an intact sleep homeostatic response in the absence of the mPer genes. In free-run conditions (constant darkness), the mPer1-mPer2 double mutants became arrhythmic, but they continued to maintain their sleep levels even after 36 days in free-running conditions. Although mPer1 and mPer2 represent key elements of the molecular clock in the SCN, they are not required for homeostatic regulation of the daily amounts of waking, SWS, or REM sleep.     

Increased ethanol intake and preference in cyclin D2 knockout mice

Inhibitory effects of passive ethanol exposure on brain neurogenesis have been extensively documented in animal models. In contrast, a role of brain neurogenesis in ethanol self-administration has not been addressed, as yet. The aim of this study was to assess intake of, and preference for, ethanol solutions [2-16% (v/v)] in a mouse model of adult neurogenesis deficiency based on permanent knockout (KO) of cyclin D2 (Ccnd2). Wild type (WT) and Ccnd2 KO mice did not differ in 2% and 4% ethanol intake. The KO group consumed significantly more ethanol in g/kg when offered with 8% or 16% ethanol as compared with the WT controls. The WT and KO mice did not differ in 2% ethanol preference, but the KO group showed a significantly higher preference for 4-16% ethanol. Animal and human studies have suggested that the low level of response to the sedative/hypnotic effects of alcohol is genetically associated with enhanced alcohol consumption. However, in this study, there were no between-genotype differences in ethanol-induced loss of righting reflex. Previous reports have also suggested that high ethanol intake is genetically associated with the avidity for sweets and better acceptance of bitter solutions. However, the KO and WT mice consumed similar amounts of saccharin solutions and the KOs consumed less quinine (i.e. bitter) solutions as compared with the WTs. In conclusion, these results may indicate that Ccnd2 and, possibly, brain neurogenesis are involved in central regulation of ethanol intake in mice.     

Ghrelin knockout mice show decreased voluntary alcohol consumption and reduced ethanol-induced conditioned place preference

Recent work suggests that stomach-derived hormone ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1A) antagonism may reduce motivational aspects of ethanol intake. In the current study we hypothesized that the endogenous GHS-R1A agonist ghrelin modulates alcohol reward mechanisms. For this purpose ethanol-induced conditioned place preference (CPP), ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation and voluntary ethanol consumption in a two-bottle choice drinking paradigm were examined under conditions where ghrelin and its receptor were blocked, either using ghrelin knockout (KO) mice or the specific ghrelin receptor (GHS-R1A) antagonist “JMV2959”. We showed that ghrelin KO mice displayed lower ethanol-induced CPP than their wild-type (WT) littermates. Consistently, when injected during CPP-acquisition, JMV2959 reduced CPP-expression in C57BL/6 mice. In addition, ethanol-induced locomotor stimulation was lower in ghrelin KO mice. Moreover, GHS-R1A blockade, using JMV2959, reduced alcohol-stimulated locomotion only in WT but not in ghrelin KO mice. When alcohol consumption and preference were assessed using the two-bottle choice test, both genetic deletion of ghrelin and pharmacological antagonism of the GHS-R1A (JMV2959) reduced voluntary alcohol consumption and preference. Finally, JMV2959-induced reduction of alcohol intake was only observed in WT but not in ghrelin KO mice. Taken together, these results suggest that ghrelin neurotransmission is necessary for the stimulatory effect of ethanol to occur, whereas lack of ghrelin leads to changes that reduce the voluntary intake as well as conditioned reward by ethanol. Our findings reveal a major, novel role for ghrelin in mediating ethanol behavior, and add to growing evidence that ghrelin is a key mediator of the effects of multiple abused drugs.     

Effects of ethanol on locomotor and anxiety-like behaviors and the acquisition of ethanol intake in Lewis and spontaneously hypertensive rats

The purpose of the present study was to investigate whether Lewis (LEW) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR), characterized in numerous behavioral tests as strains with high-anxiety and low-anxiety, respectively, could differ in their sensitivity to the effects of ethanol in the elevated plus maze (EPM) and the open field (OF), two classical models of anxiety/emotionality, as well as in the acquisition of ethanol drinking behavior. It was also of interest to examine the relationship between sweet and bitter fluids preference and ethanol intake. SHR and LEW rats were given saline or ethanol injections (0.6 or 1.2 g/kg, ip.) and tested in the EPM and OF. Subsequently the same animals were given continuous free choice between water and ethanol solution (2-8%). Additional groups of animals were exposed to a free-choice regimen between saccharin (0.002-0.09%) or quinine (0.0001-0.0015%) and water. The low dose of ethanol (0.6 g/kg) induced anxiolytic-like effects and intensive locomotor activation mainly in SHR rats tested in the OF arena. Overall, LEW counterparts were unaffected in OF test. In oral self-administration paradigm, SHR rats consumed significantly more ethanol than LEW rats. Concerning other solutions, SHR rats consumed large amounts of saccharin compared with LEW rats. These data indicate that the SHR preference for ethanol intake may be positively related to their differential sensitivity to the anxiolytic/stimulant effects of ethanol and to the sensitivity of this strain for saccharin reinforcement. In addition, these findings provide evidence that the SHR strain may represent a useful genetic and pharmacological tool to investigate ethanol drinking traits.     

Is there diurnal variation in initial and delayed orthostatic hypotension during standing and head-up tilt?

Moving rapidly from a supine to a standing posture is a common daily activity, yet a significant physiological challenge. Syncope can result from the development of initial orthostatic hypotension (IOH) involving a transient fall in systolic/diastolic blood pressure (BP) of >40/20 mm Hg within the first 15 s, and/or a delayed orthostatic hypotension (DOH) involving a fall in systolic/diastolic BP of >20/10 mm Hg within 15 min of posture change. Although epidemiological data indicate a heightened syncope risk in the morning, little is known about the diurnal variation in the IOH and DOH mechanisms associated with postural change. The authors hypothesized that the onset of IOH and DOH occurs sooner, and the associated cardiorespiratory and cerebrovascular changes are more pronounced, in the early morning. At 06:00 and 16:00 h, 17 normotensive volunteers, aged 26 ± 1 yrs (mean ± SE), completed a protocol involving supine rest, an upright stand, and a 60° head-up tilt (HUT) during which continuous beat-to-beat measurements of middle cerebral artery velocity (MCAv), mean arterial BP (MAP), heart rate, and end-tidal Pco(2) (P(ET)co(2)) were obtained. Mean MCAv was ～12% lower at baseline in the morning (p ≤ .01) and during the HUT (p ?.30). In conclusion, although there is a marked reduction in MCAv in the morning, there is an absence of diurnal variation in the onset of and associated physiological responses associated with IOH and DOH. These responses, at least in this population, are unlikely contributors to the diurnal variation in orthostatic tolerance.     

Variability of diurnality in laboratory rodents

The locomotor activity rhythms of domestic mice, laboratory rats, Syrian hamsters, Siberian hamsters, Mongolian gerbils, degus, and Nile grass rats were compared. Running-wheel activity was monitored under a light–dark cycle with 12 h of light and 12 h of darkness per day. Nile grass rats were found to be reliably diurnal, whereas laboratory rats, Siberian hamsters, domestic mice, and Syrian hamsters were reliably nocturnal. Both diurnal and nocturnal subgroups were observed in Mongolian gerbils and degus. A downward gradient of diurnality was observed from Mongolian gerbils classified as diurnal, degus classified as diurnal, gerbils classified as nocturnal, and degus classified as nocturnal. Nocturnal degus remained nocturnal when tested with an infrared motion detector without running wheels. Thus, although the diurnal–nocturnal dichotomy could be applied to some of the species, it was not appropriate for others. The dichotomy may reflect researchers’ needs for systematization more than a natural distinction between species. Through mechanisms as yet poorly understood, the balance between entraining and masking processes seems to generate a gradient of temporal niches that runs from predominantly diurnal species to predominantly nocturnal species with many chronotypes in between, including species that exhibit wide intra-species gradients of temporal niche.     

Body temperature and behaviour of golden hamsters (Mesocricetus auratus) and ground squirrels (Spermophilus tridecemlineatus) in a thermal gradient

Golden hamsters and thirteen-lined ground squirrels were maintained individually in a thermal gradient (14°C to 33°C) for several weeks under a 14L: 10D light-dark cycle. Animals of both species showed robust daily rhythms of body temperature and locomotor activity with acrophases consistent with the habits of the species (diurnal acrophases in the diurnal squirrels and nocturnal acrophases in the nocturnal hamsters). Hamsters showed a robust daily rhythm of temperature selection 180° out of phase with the rhythms of body temperature and locomotor activity. Squirrels did not show a daily rhythm of temperature selection. These results raise the hypothesis that a daily rhythm of temperature selection is exhibited by nocturnal but not by diurnal endotherms.     

SYNCHRONIZATION TO LIGHT AND RESTRICTED-FEEDING SCHEDULES OF BEHAVIORAL AND HUMORAL DAILY RHYTHMS IN GILTHEAD SEA BREAM (SPARUS AURATA)

Food is not continuously available in the wild, and so most animals show a wide variety of circadian rhythms that can be entrained to feeding time. The aim of this research was to evaluate the effect of time-restricted feeding on the daily rhythms of gilthead sea bream, with food being provided during the day or night under a 12:12?h light-dark (LD) cycle or constant light (LL) conditions. Self-feeding and locomotor activity, as well as daily rhythms of cortisol, glucose, and melatonin, were evaluated. Fish synchronized their feeding behavior to the feeding phase, so that in LD they displayed 78% nocturnal feeding activity under night-feeding and 81% diurnal feeding activity under day-feeding, while under LL-feeding they displayed 72% of their daily activity during the 12?h feeding phase. In contrast, locomotor activity was mostly diurnal (66–71%), regardless of the feeding schedule, and it became arrhythmic under LL. Cortisol showed daily rhythms that peaked at different times, depending on the light and feeding schedule: one peak several hours before feeding under day-feeding and night-feeding, and two peaks under LL-feeding. Glucose displayed low-amplitude variations, with no daily rhythms being detected. Melatonin, however, showed a nocturnal rhythm, regardless of the feeding schedule, while the rhythm became attenuated under LL. Taken together, these results highlight the role of feeding on endocrine and metabolic rhythms, suggesting that feeding behavior should be considered when studying these variables. (Author correspondence: jflopez@um.es)