Purification and characterization of two GTP-binding proteins of 22 kDa from human platelet membranes

Two GTP-binding proteins (G-proteins) of 22 kDa were purified to near homogeneity from a sodium cholate extract of human platelet membranes by successive chromatographies on DEAE-Sephacel, Ultrogel AcA-44, phenyl-Sepharose CL-4B, Mono Q HR5/5 and hydroxyapatite columns. They bound maximally 0.89 mol of [35S]guanosine 5'-(3-O-thio)triphosphate per mol of both purified proteins, and this binding was inhibited by GTP and GDP but not by ATP and AppNHp. Their molecular masses were somewhat lower than that of ras p21 and they were not recognized by an anti-v-Ki-ras p21 antibody. These results indicate that human platelet membranes contain at least two low-molecular-mass G-proteins distinct from ras p21, in addition to the heterotrimeric G-proteins, the alpha-subunits of which possess molecular mass values of about 40 kDa.     

Interdomain interactions regulate GDP release from heterotrimeric G proteins.

The role of interdomain contact sites in basal GDP release from heterotrimeric G proteins is unknown. G(alpha)(o) and G(alpha)(i1) display a 5-fold difference in the rate of GDP dissociation with half-times of 2.3 +/- 0.2 and 10.4 +/- 1.3 min, respectively. To identify molecular determinants of the GDP release rate, we evaluated the rate of binding of the fluorescent guanine nucleotide 2'(3')-O-(N-methyl-3'-anthraniloyl)guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (mGTPgammaS) to chimers of G(alpha)(o) and G(alpha)(i1). Although no one region of the G protein determined the GDP dissociation rate, when the C-terminal 123 amino acids in G(alpha)(i1) were replaced with those of G(alpha)(o), the GDP release rate increased 3.3-fold compared to that of wild-type G(alpha)(i1). Within the C-terminal portion, modification of four amino acids in a coil between beta4 and the alpha3 helix resulted in GDP release kinetics identical to those of wild-type G(alpha)(o). Based on the G(alpha)(i1)-GDP crystal structure of this region, Leu(232) appeared to form a hydrophobic contact with Arg(144) of the helical domain. The role of this interaction was confirmed by G(alpha)(i1) L232Q and G(alpha)(i1) R144A which displayed 2-5-fold faster GDP release rates compared to wild-type G(alpha)(i1) (t(1/2) 4.7 and 1.5 min, respectively), suggesting that interdomain bridging contacts partially determine the basal rate of GDP release from heterotrimeric G proteins.     

Structural Evidence for a Sequential Release Mechanism for Activation of Heterotrimeric G Proteins

Heptahelical G-protein (heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding protein)-coupled receptors couple to heterotrimeric G proteins to relay extracellular signals to intracellular signaling networks, but the molecular mechanism underlying guanosine 5′-diphosphate (GDP) release by the G protein α-subunit is not well understood. Amino acid substitutions in the conserved α5 helix of G_i, which extends from the C-terminal region to the nucleotide-binding pocket, cause dramatic increases in basal (receptor-independent) GDP release rates. For example, mutant Gα_i1-T329A shows an 18-fold increase in basal GDP release rate and, when expressed in culture, it causes a significant decrease in forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation. The crystal structure of Gα_i1-T329A·GDP shows substantial conformational rearrangement of the switch I region and additional striking alterations of side chains lining the catalytic pocket that disrupt the Mg⁺² coordination sphere and dislodge bound Mg⁺². We propose a “sequential release” mechanism whereby a transient conformational change in the α5 helix alters switch I to induce GDP release. Interestingly, this mechanistic model for heterotrimeric G protein activation is similar to that suggested for the activation of the plant small G protein Rop4 by RopGEF8.     

Survey for g-proteins in the prokaryotic genomes: prediction of functional roles based on classification

The members of the family of G-proteins are characterized by their ability to bind and hydrolyze guanosine triphosphate (GTP) to guanosine diphosphate (GDP). Despite a common biochemical function of GTP hydrolysis shared among the members of the family of G-proteins, they are associated with diverse biological roles. The current work describes the identification and detailed analysis of the putative G-proteins encoded in the completely sequenced prokaryotic genomes. Inferences on the biological roles of these G-proteins have been obtained by their classification into known functional subfamilies. We have identified 497 G-proteins in 42 genomes. Seven small GTP-binding protein homologues have been identified in prokaryotes with at least two of the diagnostic sequence motifs of G-proteins conserved. The translation factors have the largest representation (234 sequences) and are found to be ubiquitous, which is consistent with their critical role in protein synthesis. The GTP_OBG subfamily comprises of 79 sequences in our dataset. A total of 177 sequences belong to the subfamily of GTPase of unknown function and 154 of these could be associated with domains of known functions such as cell cycle regulation and t-RNA modification. The large GTP-binding proteins and the alpha-subunit of heterotrimeric G-proteins are not detected in the genomes of the prokaryotes surveyed.     

Implications of non-canonical G-protein signaling for the immune system

Heterotrimeric guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins), which consist of three subunits α, β, and γ, function as molecular switches to control downstream effector molecules activated by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). The GTP/GDP binding status of Gα transmits information about the ligand binding state of the GPCR to intended signal transduction pathways. In immune cells heterotrimeric G proteins impact signal transduction pathways that directly, or indirectly, regulate cell migration, activation, survival, proliferation, and differentiation. The cells of the innate and adaptive immune system abundantly express chemoattractant receptors and lesser amounts of many other types of GPCRs. But heterotrimeric G-proteins not only function in classical GPCR signaling, but also in non-canonical signaling. In these pathways the guanine exchange factor (GEF) exerted by a GPCR in the canonical pathway is replaced or supplemented by another protein such as Ric-8A. In addition, other proteins such as AGS3-6 can compete with Gβγ for binding to GDP bound Gα. This competition can promote Gβγ signaling by freeing Gβγ from rapidly rebinding GDP bound Gα. The proteins that participate in these non-canonical signaling pathways will be briefly described and their role, or potential one, in cells of the immune system will be highlighted.     

Evidence that a G-protein transduces signals initiated by the protein-tyrosine kinase v-Fps.

The protein-tyrosine kinase (PTK) v-Fps induces protein kinase C (PKC)-dependent expression of the transformation-related 9E3 gene in chicken embryo fibroblasts (Spangler, R., Joseph, C., Qureshi, S.A., Berg, K., and Foster, D.A. (1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 7017-7021). We present evidence here that a GTP-binding protein (G-protein) is a component of this PKC-dependent signaling pathway. 1) A GTP analogue that stimulates G-protein-mediated signals induced 9E3 gene expression. 2) A GDP analogue that inhibits signaling through G-proteins inhibited expression of 9E3 and phosphorylation of a 67-kDa PKC substrate induced by v-Fps. The GDP analogue had no effect on phosphorylation of the PKC substrate or the expression of 9E3 induced by direct activation of PKC with phorbol ester. 3) Increased v-Fps PTK activity led to increased GTP binding to a 50-kDa protein. The molecular weight of this GTP-binding protein is consistent with the molecular weight of alpha-subunits of G-proteins of the heterotrimeric class. The data suggest that a G-protein functions upstream from PKC in a signaling pathway that connects v-Fps PTK activity to increased 9E3 gene expression.     

Fluoroaluminates do not affect the guanine-nucleotide binding centre of the peptide chain elongation factor EF-Tu

EF-Tu is often referred to as a model for guanine-nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G-proteins), since X-ray diffraction analysis of its GTP-binding domain shows a detailed location of the 'consensus' amino acid sequences involved in nucleotide binding. Fluoroaluminates are thought to mimick the gamma-phosphate in the GTPase centre on account of their activating effect on a variety of GTP binding proteins. In the case of EF-Tu, we could find no such effects on the basis of at least three independent functional assays. We did notice, however, complicating interactions between free nucleotides, fluoroaluminates and other ligands. By consequence, if indeed AlF4- behaves as a gamma-phosphate analogue in G-proteins, then EF-Tu must have a different GDP/GTP binding site, despite of the conserved consensus sequences.     

The mechanism of membrane-translocation of regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) 8 induced by Galpha expression

RGS (regulators of G-protein signaling) proteins comprise a large family that modulates heterotrimeric G-protein signaling. This protein family has a common RGS domain and functions as GTPase-activating proteins for the alpha-subunits of heterotrimeric G-proteins located at the plasma membrane. RGS8 was identified as a neuron-specific RGS protein, which belongs to the B/R4 subfamily. We previously showed that RGS8 protein was translocated to the plasma membrane from the nucleus on coexpression of GTPase-deficient Galphao (GalphaoQL). Here, we first examined which subtypes of Galpha can induce the translocation of RGS8. When the Galphai family was expressed, the translocation of RGS8 did occur. To investigate the mechanism of this translocation, we generated a mutant RGS8 with reduced affinity to Galphao and an RGS-insensitive (RGS-i) mutant of GalphaoQL. Co-expression experiments with both mutants revealed that disruption of the Galpha-RGS8 interaction abolished the membrane-translocation of RGS8 despite the apparent membrane localization of RGS-i GalphaoQL. These results demonstrated that RGS8 is recruited to the plasma membrane where G-proteins are activated mainly by direct association with Galpha.     

The molecular determinants in the serpentine type receptors,responsible for its functional coupling with the heterotrimeric G-protein

In the review, data of the literature and own results on the functional coupling between the serpentine type receptors and the heterotrimeric G-proteins are analyzed and summarized. The role of cytoplasmic loops and C-tail domain of the receptors in interaction with G-protein alpha-subunits of different types is discussed. On the basis of theoretical analysis it is shown that the second cytoplasmic loop and the proximal to the membrane segments of the third cytoplasmic loop, containing the main G-protein-coupled molecular determinants, have the cationic nature and can form the helical structures. A molecular model of signal transduction from the receptor to G-protein, based on the electrostatic interactions between the cytoplasmic loops of receptors and receptor-binding regions of G-proteins, is developed.     

GTP-Binding Regulatory Proteins in Higher Plant Cells

The exsitence of GTP-binding regulatory proteins (for short term, often refered as G-proteins) in higher plant cells is certain. G-proteins are classified into two groups based on their molecular structures, which are the heterotrimeric G-proteins (big G-proteins) that contain three different subunits and the small G-proteins that have only one subunit (monomeric G-proteins). All G-proteins are characterized by their properties to bind with and hydrolyze GTP, by which G-proteins function as transmembrane and intracellular signalling molecules. As a distinguished participant in signal transduction, G-proteins directly and/or indirectly regulate a number of physiological processes, such as regulation of phytochrome-related physiological processes and gene expression, involvement in blue-light response, K+-channel regulation, stomatal movement, hormone regulation, protein phosphrylation dephosphorylation, etc. Although G-proteins in plant cells have not been purified, the genes for a subunit of heterotrimeric G-proteins have been cloned. More evidences for the importance of G-proteins in plant signalling processes are rapidly accumulating.     

A sweet cycle for Arabidopsis G-proteins: Recent discoveries and controversies in plant G-protein signal transduction

Heterotrimeric G-proteins are a class of signal transduction proteins highly conserved throughout evolution that serve as dynamic molecular switches regulating the intracellular communication initiated by extracellular signals including sensory information. This property is achieved by a guanine nucleotide cycle wherein the inactive, signaling-incompetent Gα subunit is normally bound to GDP; activation to signaling-competent Gα occurs through the exchange of GDP for GTP (typically catalyzed via seven-transmembrane domain G-protein coupled receptors [GPCRs]), which dissociates the Gβγ dimer from Gα-GTP and initiates signal transduction. The hydrolysis of GTP, greatly accelerated by “Regulator of G-protein Signaling” (RGS) proteins, returns Gα to its inactive GDP-bound form and terminates signaling. Through extensive characterization of mammalian Gα isoforms, the rate-limiting step in this cycle is currently considered to be the GDP/GTP exchange rate, which can be orders of magnitude slower than the GTP hydrolysis rate. However, we have recently demonstrated that, in Arabidopsis, the guanine nucleotide cycle appears to be limited by the rate of GTP hydrolysis rather than nucleotide exchange. This finding has important implications for the mechanism of sugar sensing in Arabidopsis. We also discuss these data on Arabidopsis G-protein nucleotide cycling in relation to recent reports of putative plant GPCRs and heterotrimeric G-protein effectors in Arabidopsis.Key words: Arabidopsis, glucose, G-protein, nucleotide exchange, RGS protein     

Somatostatin receptors and signaling cascades coupled to them

The peptide hormone somatostatin controlling functions of CNS and peripheral organs and tissues realizes its regulatory effects via five types of somatostatin receptors (SomR) coupled to heterotrimeric G-proteins. Targets of the hormone action are the enzymes generating second messengers (adenylyl cyclase, phospholipase C, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase), phosphotyrosine phosphatases, ion channels. The review summarizes and analyzes literature data and results of our studies on molecular mechanisms of transduction of the somatostatin signal into the cell, selectivity of interaction of SomR with heterotrimeric G-proteins and intracellular effectors as well as on effect of SomR oligomerization on their functional activity.     

S111N mutation in the helical domain of human Gs(alpha) reduces its GDP/GTP exchange rate

G-protein alpha subunits consist of two domains: a Ras-like domain also called GTPase domain (GTPaseD), structurally homologous to monomeric G-proteins, and a more divergent domain, unique to heterotrimeric G-proteins, called helical domain (HD). G-protein activation, requires the exchange of bound GDP for GTP, and since the guanine nucleotide is buried in a deep cleft between both domains, it has been postulated that activation may involve a conformational change that will allow the opening of this cleft. Therefore, it has been proposed, that interdomain interactions are playing an important role in regulating the nucleotide exchange rate of the alpha subunit. While constructing different Gs(alpha) quimeras, we identified a Gs(alpha) random mutant, which was very inefficient in stimulating adenylyl cyclase activity. The introduced mutation corresponded to the substitution of Ser(111) for Asn (S111N), located in the carboxi terminal end of helix A of the HD, a region neither involved in AC interaction nor in the interdomain interface. In order to characterize this mutant, we expressed it in bacteria, purified it by niquel-agarose chromatography, and studied its nucleotide exchange properties. We demonstrated that the recombinant S111N Gs(alpha) was functional since it was able to undergo the characteristic conformational change upon GTP binding, detected by the acquisition of a trypsin-resistant conformation. When the biochemical properties were determined, the mutant protein exhibited a reduced GDP dissociation kinetics and as a consequence a slower GTPgammaS binding rate that was responsible for a diminished adenylyl cyclase activation when GTPgammaS was used as activator. These data provide new evidence that involves the HD as a regulator of Gs(alpha) function, in this case the alphaA helix, which is not directly involved with the nucleotide binding site nor the interdomain interface.     

Nullspace Sampling with Holonomic Constraints Reveals Molecular Mechanisms of Protein Gαs

Proteins perform their function or interact with partners by exchanging between conformational substates on a wide range of spatiotemporal scales. Structurally characterizing these exchanges is challenging, both experimentally and computationally. Large, diffusional motions are often on timescales that are difficult to access with molecular dynamics simulations, especially for large proteins and their complexes. The low frequency modes of normal mode analysis (NMA) report on molecular fluctuations associated with biological activity. However, NMA is limited to a second order expansion about a minimum of the potential energy function, which limits opportunities to observe diffusional motions. By contrast, kino-geometric conformational sampling (KGS) permits large perturbations while maintaining the exact geometry of explicit conformational constraints, such as hydrogen bonds. Here, we extend KGS and show that a conformational ensemble of the α subunit Gαs of heterotrimeric stimulatory protein Gs exhibits structural features implicated in its activation pathway. Activation of protein Gs by G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) is associated with GDP release and large conformational changes of its α-helical domain. Our method reveals a coupled α-helical domain opening motion while, simultaneously, Gαs helix α₅ samples an activated conformation. These motions are moderated in the activated state. The motion centers on a dynamic hub near the nucleotide-binding site of Gαs, and radiates to helix α₄. We find that comparative NMA-based ensembles underestimate the amplitudes of the motion. Additionally, the ensembles fall short in predicting the accepted direction of the full activation pathway. Taken together, our findings suggest that nullspace sampling with explicit, holonomic constraints yields ensembles that illuminate molecular mechanisms involved in GDP release and protein Gs activation, and further establish conformational coupling between key structural elements of Gαs.     

Polycationic peptides as nonhormonal regulators of chemosignal systems

This review summarizes and analyzes both literature data and results of our own studies on molecular mechanisms of action of natural and artificially created polycationic peptides on functional activity of heterotrimeric G-protein-coupled signal systems. There are considered peptide toxins from insect venom, synthetic peptides that are derivatives of cytoplasmic loops of receptors of the serpentine type as well as artificially created peptides with linear, branched, and dendrimeric structures. Action of most of these peptides on activity of G-proteins is highly selective and these themselves are able to mimic the hormone-activated receptor to be thereby non-hormonal regulators of the signal systems coupled to heterotrimeric G-proteins.     

AGS proteins, GPR motifs and the signals processed by heterotrimeric G proteins

A long term objective of our research effort is to define factors that influence the specificity and efficiency of signal propagation by heterotrimeric G-proteins (G). G-proteins play a central role in cellular communication mediating the cell response to numerous hormones and neurotransmitters. A major determinant of signalling specificity for heterotrimeric G-proteins is the cell specific expression of the subtypes of the primary signalling entities, receptor, G and effector (E). Another major site for regulating signalling specificity lies at the R-G or G-E interface where these interactions are influenced by cell architecture, the stoichiometry of signalling components and accessory proteins that may segregate the receptor to microdomains of the cell, regulate the efficiency and/or specificity of signal transfer and/or influence the activation state of G-protein independent of a classical G-protein coupled receptor. One strategy to address these issues in our laboratory involves the identification of cellular proteins that regulate the transfer of signal from receptor to G or directly influence the activation state of G independent of a classical G-protein coupled receptor. We identified three proteins, AGS1, AGS2 and AGS3 (for Activators of G-protein Signaling), that activated heterotrimeric G-protein signalling pathways in the absence of a typical receptor. AGS1, 2 and 3 interact with different subunits and/or conformations of heterotrimeric G-proteins, selectively activate different G-proteins, provide unexpected mechanisms for regulation of the G-protein activation cycle and have opened up a new area of research related to the cellular role of G-proteins as signal transducers.     

Nod factors activate both heterotrimeric and monomeric G-proteins in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Vigna unguiculata</Emphasis> (L.) Walp

Nod factors are lipo-chito-oligosaccharides secreted by rhizobia that initiate many responses in the root hairs of the legume hosts, culminating in deformed hairs. The heterotrimeric G-protein agonists mastoparan, Mas7, melittin, compound 48/80 and cholera toxin provoke root hair deformation, whereas the heterotrimeric G-protein antagonist pertussis toxin inhibits mastoparan and Nod factor NodNGR[S]- (from Rhizobiumsp. NGR234) induced root hair deformation. Another heterotrimeric G-protein antagonist, isotetrandrine, only inhibited root hair deformation provoked by mastoparan and melittin. These results support the notion that G-proteins are implicated in Nod factor signalling. To study the role of G-proteins at a biochemical level, we examined the GTP-binding profiles of root microsomal membrane fractions isolated from the nodulation competent zone of Vigna unguiculata(L.) Walp. GTP competitively bound to the microsomal membrane fractions labelled with [(35)S]GTPgammaS, yielding a two-site displacement curve with displacement constants ( K(i)) of 0.58 micro M and 0.16 mM. Competition with either ATP or GDP revealed a one-site displacement curve with K(i) of 4.4 and 29 micro M, respectively, whereas ADP and UTP were ineffective competitors. The GTP-binding profiles of microsomal membrane fractions isolated from roots pretreated with either NodNGR[S] or the four-sugar, N- N'- N"- N'"-tetracetylchitotetraose (TACT) backbone of Nod factors were significantly altered compared with control microsomal fractions. To identify candidate proteins, membrane proteins were separated by SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred to nitrocellulose. GTP overlay experiments revealed that membrane fractions isolated from roots pretreated with NodNGR[S] or TACT contained two proteins (28 kDa and 25 kDa) with a higher affinity for GTPgammaS than control membrane fractions. Western analysis demonstrated that membranes from the pretreated roots contained more of another protein (~55 kDa) recognised by Galpha(common) antisera. These results provide pharmacological and biochemical evidence supporting the contention that G-proteins are involved in Nod factor signalling and, importantly, implicate monomeric G-proteins in this process.     

Heterotrimeric G-protein signaling in Arabidopsis: Puzzling G-protein-coupled receptor

Seven transmembrane G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are commonly used by eukaryotes to sense extracellular signals to switch on cellular responses through the activation of cognate heterotrimeric G-proteins. In Arabidopsis thaliana, GCR2 has been proposed as a GPCR for the plant hormone abscisic acid. On the other hand, biochemical analysis demonstrates that the sole Arabidopsis heterotrimeric G-protein α subunit, GPA1, is in the activated state (GTP-bound) by default, suggesting that the heterotrimeric G-proteins may act without any GPCRs.Key words: heterotrimeric G-proteins, GCR2, GPA1, G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), AtRGS1     

Activation of Plant Plasma Membrane Ca2+-Permeable Channels by Race-Specific Fungal Elicitors

The response of plant cells to invading pathogens is regulated by fluctuations in cytosolic Ca2+ levels that are mediated by Ca2+-permeable channels located at the plasma membrane of the host cell. The mechanisms by which fungal elicitors can induce Ca2+ uptake by the host cell were examined by the application of conventional patch-clamp techniques. Whole-cell and single-channel experiments on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum L.) protoplasts revealed a race-specific fungal elicitor-induced activation of a plasma membrane Ca2+-permeable channel. The presence of the fungal elicitor resulted in a greater probability of channel opening. Guanosine 5[prime]-[[beta]-thio]diphosphate, a GDP analog that locks heterotrimeric G-proteins into their inactivated state, abolished the channel activation induced by the fungal elicitor, whereas guanosine 5[prime][[gamma]-thio]triphosphate, a nonhydrolyzable GTP analog that locks heterotrimeric G-proteins into their activated state, produced an effect similar to that observed with the fungal elicitor. Mastoparan, which stimulates GTPase activity, mimicked the effect of GTP[[gamma]]S. The addition of HA1004 (a protein kinase inhibitor) in the presence of the elicitor totally abolished channel activity, whereas okadaic acid (a protein phosphatase inhibitor) moderately enhanced channel activity, suggesting that the activation of the channel by fungal elicitors is modulated by a heterotrimeric G-protein-dependent phosphorylation of the channel protein.     

A switch in the kinase domain of rat testis 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-bisphosphatase.

The bifunctional enzyme 6-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2, 6-bisphosphatase plays an essential role in the regulation of glucose metabolism by both producing and degrading Fru-2,6-P(2) via its distinct catalytic activities. The 6-PF-2-K and Fru-2,6-P(2)ase active sites are located in separate domains of the enzyme. The kinase domain is structurally related to the superfamily of mononucleotide binding proteins that includes adenylate kinase and the G-proteins. We have determined three new structures of the enzymatic monomer, each with a different ligand in the ATP binding site of the 6-PF-2-K domain (AMP-PNP, PO(4), and water). A comparison of these three new structures with the ATPgammaS-bound 6-PF-2-K domain reveals a rearrangement of a helix that is dependent on the ligand bound in the ATP binding site of the enzyme. This helix motion dramatically alters the position of a catalytic residue (Lys172). This catalytic cation is analogous to the Arg residue donated by the rasGAP protein, and the Arg residue at the core of the GTP or GDP sensing switch motion seen in the heterotrimeric G-proteins. In addition, a succinate molecule is observed in the Fru-6-P binding site. Kinetic analysis of succinate inhibition of the 6-PF-2-K reaction is consistent with the structural findings, and suggests a mechanism for feedback inhibition of glycolysis by citric acid cycle intermediates. Alterations in the 6-PF-2-K kinetics of several proteins mutated near both the switch and the succinate binding site suggest a mode of communication between the ATP- and F6P binding sites. Together with these kinetic data, these new structures provide insights into the mechanism of the 6-PF-2-K activity of this important bifunctional enzyme.