SABRE is required for stabilization of root hair patterning in Arabidopsis thaliana

Patterned differentiation of distinct cell types is essential for the development of multicellular organisms. The root epidermis of Arabidopsis thaliana is composed of alternating files of root hair and non‐hair cells and represents a model system for studying the control of cell‐fate acquisition. Epidermal cell fate is regulated by a network of genes that translate positional information from the underlying cortical cell layer into a specific pattern of differentiated cells. While much is known about the genes of this network, new players continue to be discovered. Here we show that the SABRE (SAB) gene, known to mediate microtubule organization, anisotropic cell growth and planar polarity, has an effect on root epidermal hair cell patterning. Loss of SAB function results in ectopic root hair formation and destabilizes the expression of cell fate and differentiation markers in the root epidermis, including expression of the WEREWOLF (WER) and GLABRA2 (GL2) genes. Double mutant analysis reveal that wer and caprice (cpc) mutants, defective in core components of the epidermal patterning pathway, genetically interact with sab. This suggests that SAB may act on epidermal patterning upstream of WER and CPC. Hence, we provide evidence for a role of SAB in root epidermal patterning by affecting cell‐fate stabilization. Our work opens the door for future studies addressing SAB‐dependent functions of the cytoskeleton during root epidermal patterning.     

WEREWOLF, a MYB-related protein in Arabidopsis, is a position-dependent regulator of epidermal cell patterning

The formation of the root epidermis of Arabidopsis provides a simple and elegant model for the analysis of cell patterning. A novel gene, WEREWOLF (WER), is described here that is required for position-dependent patterning of the epidermal cell types. The WER gene encodes a MYB-type protein and is preferentially expressed within cells destined to adopt the non-hair fate. Furthermore, WER is shown to regulate the position-dependent expression of the GLABRA2 homeobox gene, to interact with a bHLH protein, and to act in opposition to the CAPRICE MYB. These results suggest a simple model to explain the specification of the two root epidermal cell types, and they provide insight into the molecular mechanisms used to control cell patterning.     

Tornado1 and tornado2 are required for the specification of radial and circumferential pattern in the Arabidopsis root

The cell layers of the Arabidopsis primary root are arranged in a simple radial pattern. The outermost layer is the lateral root cap and lies outside the epidermis that surrounds the ground tissue. The files of epidermal and lateral root cap cells converge on a ring of initials (lateral root cap/epidermis initial) from which the epidermal and lateral root cap tissues of the seedling are derived, once root growth is initiated after germination. Each initial gives rise to a clone of epidermal cells and a clone of lateral root cap cells. These initial divisions in the epidermal/lateral root cap initial are defective in tornado1 (trn1) and trn2 plants indicating a requirement for TRN1 and TRN2 for initial cell function. Furthermore, lateral root cap cells develop in the epidermal position in trn1 and trn2 roots indicating that TRN1 and TRN2 are required for the maintenance of the radial pattern of cell specification in the root. The death of these ectopic lateral root cap cells in the elongation zone (where lateral root cap cells normally die) results in the development of gaps in the epidermis. These observations indicate that TRN1 and TRN2 are required to maintain the distinction between the lateral root cap and epidermis and suggest that lateral root cap fate is the default state. It also suggests that TRN1 and TRN2 repress lateral root cap fate in cells in the epidermal location. Furthermore, the position-dependent pattern of root hair and non-root hair cell differentiation in the epidermis is defective in trn1 and trn2 mutants. Together these results indicate that TRN1 and TRN2 are required for the maintenance of both the radial pattern of tissue differentiation in the root and for the subsequent circumferential pattern within the epidermis.     

植物根毛生长发育及分子调控机理

植物根毛是植物吸收营养的主要器官, 了解根毛的发生、发育及遗传规律, 能对植物的养分吸收研究提供有利依据。文章旨在介绍植物根毛形态发生特性、发育生长过程及分子调控机理的研究进展, 利用比较基因组学方法研究农作物根毛形态和功能, 及有目的性的对根生长发育进行调控提供参考。研究发现植物根毛发育有反馈侧向抑制(lateral inhibition with feedback)和位置决定模式(position-dependent pattern of cell differentiation)两种方式。拟南芥根表皮细胞是以位置方式决定毛或非毛细胞发育类型, 已成为研究植物细胞命运和分化的模型。目前, 已经鉴定出控制根毛发育的基因, 包括一些转录因子如MYB家族蛋白TRIPTYCHON(TRY)、CAPRICE(CPC)和basic Helix-Loop-Helix (bHLH)蛋白GLABRA3、ENHANCER OF GLABRA3(EGL3)及WD-repeat蛋白等基因。最后针对根毛研究前景提出展望。     

Epidermal cell patterning and differentiation throughout the apical-basal axis of the seedling

The idea of common pathways guiding different fates is an emerging concept in plant development, and epidermal cell-fate specification in Arabidopsis thaliana is an excellent example to illustrate it. In the root epidermis, both hair patterning and differentiation depend on a complex interaction between both negative (WER, TTG, GL3, EGL3, and GL2) and positive (CPC, TRY, and ETC1) regulators of hair cell fate. These regulators pattern and differentiate hairs through a bi-directional signalling mechanism. The same molecular components (WER, TTG, GL3, EGL3, and GL2) seem to be involved in the patterning of stomata in the embryonic stem. However, the possible role of CPC, TRY, and ETC1 on stomatal patterning and/or differentiation has not been studied, questioning whether they, and the underlying bi-directional mechanism, guide patterning formation and differentiation in the hypocotyl.     

Two ways to skin a plant: The analysis of root and shoot epidermal development in Arabidopsis

The post-embryonic architecture of higher plants is derived from the activity of two meristems that are formed in the embryo: the shoot meristem and the root meristem. The epidermis of the shoot is derived from the outermost layer of cells covering the shoot meristem through repeated anticlinal divisions. By contrast, the epidermis of the root is derived from an internal ring of cells, located at the centre of the root meristem, by a precise series of both periclinal and anticlinal divisions. Each epidermis has an independent origin. In Arabidopsis the mature shoot epidermis is composed of a small number of cell types: hair cells (trichomes), stomatal guard cells and other epidermal cells. In shoots, hairs take the form of branched trichomes that are surrounded at their base by a ring of accessory cells in a sheet of epidermal cells. The root epidermis is composed of two cell types: trichoblasts that form root hair cells and atrichoblasts that form non-hair cells. Mutations affecting both the patterning and the morphogenesis of cells in both shoot and root epidermis have recently been described. Most of these mutations affect development in a single epidermis, but at least one, ttg, is involved in development in both epidermal systems.     

The expression patterns of arabinogalactan-protein AtAGP30 and GLABRA2 reveal a role for abscisic acid in the early stages of root epidermal patterning

In the Arabidopsis root, patterning of the epidermal cell types is position-dependent. The epidermal cell pattern arises early during root development, and can be visualized using reporter genes driven by the GLABRA (GL)2 promoter as markers. The GL2 gene is preferentially expressed in the differentiating hairless cells (atrichoblasts) during a period in which epidermal cell identity is believed to be established. We show that AtAGP30 is also expressed in atrichoblasts. This gene encodes an arabinogalactan-protein (AGP) that is known to play a role in root regeneration and increases abscisic acid (ABA)-response rates. Although the expression level of this gene is regulated by the plant growth factors ABA and ethylene, only ABA was found to affect the tissue-specific pattern of expression. ABA also disrupts the expression pattern of the GL2::GUS (beta-glucuronidase) reporter gene. Our results indicate that ABA regulates epidermal cell-type-specific gene expression in the meristematic zone of the Arabidopsis root, while ethylene is known to act at later stages of epidermal differentiation. Despite its effects on the early stages of root epidermal patterning, ABA does not affect root hair formation on mature wild-type epidermal cells, suggesting that other developmental cues, like positional information, can progressively over-ride the ABA-mediated disruption of early epidermal patterning.     

TRIPTYCHON,not CAPRICE,participates in feedback regulation of SCM expression in the Arabidopsis root epidermis

The Arabidopsis root epidermal cells decide their fates (root-hair cell and non-hair cell) according to their position. SCRAMBLED (SCM), an atypical leucine-rich repeat receptor-like kinase (LRR RLK) mediates the positional information to the epidermal cells enabling them to adopt the proper fate. Via feedback regulation, the SCM protein accumulates preferentially in cells adopting the root-hair cell fate. In this study, we determine that TRY, but not the related factor CPC, is responsible for this preferential SCM accumulation. We observed severe reduction of SCM::GUS expression in the try-82 mutant root, but not in the cpc-1 mutant. Furthermore, the overexpression of TRY by CaMV35S promoter caused an increase in the expression of SCM::GUS in the root epidermis. Intriguingly, the overexpression of CPC by CaMV35S promoter repressed the expression of SCM::GUS. Together, these results suggest that TRY plays a unique role in generating the appropriate spatial expression of SCM.     

Yeast Rrp8p,a novel methyltransferase responsible for m1A 645 base modification of 25S rRNA

Ribosomal RNA undergoes various modifications to optimize ribosomal structure and expand the topological potential of RNA. The most common nucleotide modifications in ribosomal RNA (rRNA) are pseudouridylations and 2′-O methylations (Nm), performed by H/ACA box snoRNAs and C/D box snoRNAs, respectively. Furthermore, rRNAs of both ribosomal subunits also contain various base modifications, which are catalysed by specific enzymes. These modifications cluster in highly conserved areas of the ribosome. Although most enzymes catalysing 18S rRNA base modifications have been identified, little is known about the 25S rRNA base modifications. The m¹A modification at position 645 in Helix 25.1 is highly conserved in eukaryotes. Helix formation in this region of the 25S rRNA might be a prerequisite for a correct topological framework for 5.8S rRNA to interact with 25S rRNA. Surprisingly, we have identified ribosomal RNA processing protein 8 (Rrp8), a nucleolar Rossman-fold like methyltransferase, to carry out the m¹A base modification at position 645, although Rrp8 was previously shown to be involved in A2 cleavage and 40S biogenesis. In addition, we were able to identify specific point mutations in Rrp8, which show that a reduced S-adenosyl-methionine binding influences the quality of the 60S subunit. This highlights the dual functionality of Rrp8 in the biogenesis of both subunits.     

Mutations in the nucleolar proteins Tma23 and Nop6 suppress the malfunction of the Nep1 protein

The nucleolar Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein Nep1 was previously shown to bind to a specific site of the 18S rRNA and to be involved in assembly of Rps19p into pre-40S ribosome subunits. Here we report on the identification of tma23 and nop6 mutations as recessive suppressors of a nep1(ts) mutant allele and the nep1 deletion as well. Green fluorescent protein fusions localized Tma23p and Nop6p within the nucleolus, indicating their function in ribosome biogenesis. The high lysine content of both proteins and an RNA binding motif in the Nop6p amino acid sequence suggest RNA-binding functions for both factors. Surprisingly, in contrast to Nep1p, Tma23p and Nop6p seem to be specific for fungi as no homologues could be found in higher eukaryotes. In contrast to most other ribosome biogenesis factors, Tma23p and Nop6p are nonessential in S. cerevisiae. Interestingly, the tma23 mutants showed a considerably increased resistance against the aminoglycoside G418, probably due to a structural change in the 40S ribosomal subunit, which could be the result of incorrectly folded 18S rRNA gene, missing rRNA modifications or the lack of a ribosomal protein.