Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen Is Protected from Degradation by Forming a Complex with MutT Homolog2

Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) has been demonstrated to interact with multiple proteins involved in several metabolic pathways such as DNA replication and repair. However, there have been fewer reports about whether these PCNA-binding proteins influence stability of PCNA. Here, we observed a physical interaction between PCNA and MutT homolog2 (MTH2), a new member of the MutT-related proteins that hydrolyzes 8-oxo-7,8-dihydrodeoxyguanosine triphosphate (8-oxo-dGTP). In several unstressed human cancer cell lines and in normal human fibroblast cells, PCNA and MTH2 formed a complex and their mutual binding fragments were confirmed. It was intriguing that PCNA and MTH2 were dissociated dependent on acetylation of PCNA, which in turn induced degradation of PCNA in response to UV irradiation, but not in response to other forms of DNA-damaging stress. To further explore the link between dissociation of PCNA-MTH2 and degradation of PCNA, RNAi against MTH2 was performed to mimic the dissociated status of PCNA to evaluate changes in the half-life of PCNA. Knockdown of MTH2 significantly promoted degradation of PCNA, suggesting that the physiological interaction of PCNA-MTH2 may confer protection from degradation for PCNA, whereas UV irradiation accelerates PCNA degradation by inducing dissociation of PCNA-MTH2. Moreover, secondary to degradation of PCNA, UV-induced inhibition of DNA synthesis or cell cycle progression was enhanced. Collectively, our data demonstrate for the first time that PCNA is protected by this newly identified partner molecule MTH2, which is related to DNA synthesis and cell cycle progression.Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA)³ is a member of the DNA sliding clamp family and consists of a ring-shaped trimeric complex (1–3). Three PCNA monomers, each comprising two similar domains, are joined in a head-to-tail arrangement to form a closed ring (4, 5). Because of this unique structure, PCNA encircles the DNA double helix and slides freely along it. PCNA was originally characterized as a DNA polymerase processivity factor and it increases the processivity of DNA synthesis by interacting with polymerase δ (6, 7). Subsequent studies revealed that PCNA plays an important role in DNA replication (8, 9). For example, PCNA not only functions as a protein binding platform to interact with the DNA polymerases, flap endonuclease-1 (Fen1) or DNA ligase I (10–12), but also coordinates complicated processes in DNA replication (2, 13). In addition, PCNA also plays a role in DNA damage repair (14–17) and cell cycle control (18–20).Because PCNA is essential for DNA synthesis both in DNA replication and repair, a dynamic balance between PCNA synthesis and degradation is critical for maintaining normal DNA synthesis. Up-regulation of PCNA accelerates DNA synthesis and promotes cell proliferation, such that PCNA is regarded as a general proliferation marker in tumor development. On the other hand, degradation of PCNA leads to inhibition of DNA synthesis (9, 21). In this case, in response to inhibition of DNA synthesis by PCNA degradation, both cell proliferation and DNA repair are inhibited, and cells are thus subject to death.In Escherichia coli, MutT protein encoded by the mutT gene has 8-oxo-dGTPase activity, and hydrolyzes 8-oxo-dGTP to 8-oxo-dGMP, which is nonutilizable for DNA synthesis, thus preventing misincorporation of 8-oxo-dGTP into DNA (22). 8-Oxo-dGTP is a product of dGTP oxidation and can be inserted into opposite dA or dC residues of template DNA at almost equal efficiencies. As a result, G:C to T:A or T:A to G:C transversion mutations occur (22–24). In a mutT-deficient strain, the rate of spontaneous occurrence of A:T to C:G transversion increases by 1000-fold compared with that of cells with wild type mutT (25–27). Therefore, MutT protein is required for preventing mutations and maintaining high fidelity of DNA replication (28). In addition, RibA is a backup enzyme for MutT in E. coli and also plays a role in maintaining high fidelity of DNA replication (29). The MutT homologue MTH1 is the first MutT-related protein found in mammalian cells (30). The spontaneous mutation frequency in MTH1-deficient cells showed an increase of ∼2-fold as compared with that in wild type MTH1 cells (31). Comparing the mutation frequency in mutT-deficient E. coli cells with that in MTH1-deficient mammalian cells suggests that there must be other proteins responsible for preventing occurrence of high numbers of oxidative damage induced mutations in mammalian cells. By searching the GenBank^TM EST data base, our research group and others (32) have cloned a new member of MutT-related protein, MTH2. The increased mutation frequency in mutT-deficient cells was significantly reduced by overexpression of MTH2 cDNA (32). Therefore, MTH2 may help to ensure cells achieve accurate DNA synthesis. However, aside from the activity of 8-oxo-dGTPase, the exact mechanism by which MTH2 influences DNA synthesis has not been explored.The functions of both PCNA and MTH2 partially overlap in DNA synthesis, thus warranting exploration of whether MTH2 works together with PCNA to regulate DNA replication or repair. In this study, we found that MTH2 directly interacts with PCNA, and this interaction enhances PCNA stability. However, when cells were exposed to UV light, the interaction of MTH2 and PCNA was disrupted, and PCNA degradation was accelerated. Consequently, DNA synthesis was reduced, and cell cycling was arrested.     

Dual Nuclease and Helicase Activities of Helicobacter pylori AddAB Are Required for DNA Repair, Recombination, and Mouse Infectivity

Helicobacter pylori infection of the human stomach is associated with disease-causing inflammation that elicits DNA damage in both bacterial and host cells. Bacteria must repair their DNA to persist. The H. pylori AddAB helicase-exonuclease is required for DNA repair and efficient stomach colonization. To dissect the role of each activity in DNA repair and infectivity, we altered the AddA and AddB nuclease (NUC) domains and the AddA helicase (HEL) domain by site-directed mutagenesis. Extracts of Escherichia coli expressing H. pylori addA^NUCB or addAB^NUC mutants unwound DNA but had approximately half of the exonuclease activity of wild-type AddAB; the addA^NUCB^NUC double mutant lacked detectable nuclease activity but retained helicase activity. Extracts with AddA^HELB lacked detectable helicase and nuclease activity. H. pylori with the single nuclease domain mutations were somewhat less sensitive to the DNA-damaging agent ciprofloxacin than the corresponding deletion mutant, suggesting that residual nuclease activity promotes limited DNA repair. The addA^NUC and addA^HEL mutants colonized the stomach less efficiently than the wild type; addB^NUC showed partial attenuation. E. coli ΔrecBCD expressing H. pylori addAB was recombination-deficient unless H. pylori recA was also expressed, suggesting a species-specific interaction between AddAB and RecA and also that H. pylori AddAB participates in both DNA repair and recombination. These results support a role for both the AddAB nuclease and helicase in DNA repair and promoting infectivity.Infection of the stomach with Helicobacter pylori causes a variety of diseases including gastritis, peptic ulcers, and gastric cancer (1). A central feature of the pathology of these conditions is the establishment of a chronic inflammatory response that acts both on the host and the infecting bacteria (2). Both epithelial (3, 4) and lymphoid (5, 6) cells in the gastric mucosa of infected individuals release DNA-damaging agents that can introduce double-stranded (ds)² breaks into the bacterial chromosome (7). The ds breaks must be repaired for the bacteria to survive and establish chronic colonization of the stomach. Homologous recombination is required for the faithful repair of DNA damage and bacterial survival. Alteration of the expression of one of a series of cell surface proteins on H. pylori occurs by an apparent gene conversion of babA, the frequency of which is reduced in repair-deficient strains (8, 9). This change in the cell surface, which may allow H. pylori to evade the host immune response, is a second means by which recombination can promote efficient colonization of the stomach by H. pylori.The initiation or presynaptic steps of recombination at dsDNA breaks in most bacteria involves the coordinated action of nuclease and helicase activities provided by one of two multisubunit enzymes, the AddAB and RecBCD enzymes (10). Escherichia coli recBCD null mutants have reduced cell viability, are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents, and are homologous recombination-deficient (11–14). Similarly, H. pylori addA and addB null mutants are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents, have reduced frequencies of babA gene conversion, and colonize the stomach of mice less efficiently than wild-type strains (8).The activities of RecBCD enzyme from E. coli (15–19) and AddAB from H. pylori (8) or Bacillus subtilis (20–23) indicate some common general features of the presynaptic steps of DNA repair. In the case of E. coli, repair begins when the RecBCD enzyme binds to a dsDNA end and unwinds the DNA using its ATP-dependent helicase activities (17, 24). Single-stranded (ss) DNA produced during unwinding, with or without accompanying nuclease, is coated with RecA protein (16, 25). This recombinogenic substrate engages in strand exchange with a homologous intact duplex to form a joint molecule. Joint molecules are thought to be converted into intact, recombinant DNA either by replication or by cutting and ligation of exchanged strands (26).Although the AddAB and RecBCD enzymes appear to play similar roles in promoting recombination and DNA repair, they differ in several ways. RecBCD is a heterotrimer, composed of one copy of the RecB, RecC, and RecD gene products (27), whereas AddAB has two subunits, encoded by the addA and addB genes (21, 28). The enzyme subunit(s) responsible for helicase activity can be inferred from the presence of conserved protein domains or the activity of purified proteins. AddA, RecB, and RecD are superfamily I helicases with six highly conserved helicase motifs, including the conserved Walker A box found in many enzymes that bind ATP (29–32). A Walker A box is defined by the consensus sequence (G/A)XXGXGKT (X is any amino acid (29). RecBCD enzymes in which the conserved Lys in this motif is changed to Gln have a reduced affinity for ATP binding (33, 34) and altered helicase activity (17, 35–37).A nuclease domain with the conserved amino acid sequence LDYK is found in RecB, AddA, AddB, and many other nucleases (38). The conserved Asp plays a role in Mg²⁺ binding at the active site; Mg²⁺ is required for nuclease activity (39). The recB1080 mutation, which changes codon 1080 from the conserved Asp in this motif to Ala, eliminates nuclease activity (39).We have recently shown that addA and addB deletion mutants are hypersensitive to DNA-damaging agents and impaired in colonization of the mouse stomach compared with wild-type strains (8). To determine the roles of the individual helicase and nuclease activities of H. pylori AddAB in DNA repair and infectivity, we used site-directed mutagenesis to inactivate the conserved nuclease domains of addA and addB and the conserved ATPase (helicase) domain of AddA. Here, we report that loss of the AddAB helicase is sufficient to impair H. pylori DNA repair and infectivity and, when the genes are expressed in E. coli, homologous recombination. AddAB retains partial activity in biochemical and genetic assays when either of the two nuclease domains is inactivated but loses all detectable nuclease activity when both domains are inactivated. Remarkably, H. pylori AddAB can produce recombinants in E. coli only in the presence of H. pylori RecA, suggesting a species-specific interaction in which AddAB facilitates the production of ssDNA-coated with RecA protein. Our results show that both the helicase and nuclease activities are required for the biological roles of H. pylori AddAB.     

Bloom Syndrome Helicase Stimulates RAD51 DNA Strand Exchange Activity through a Novel Mechanism

Loss or inactivation of BLM, a helicase of the RecQ family, causes Bloom syndrome, a genetic disorder with a strong predisposition to cancer. Although the precise function of BLM remains unknown, genetic data has implicated BLM in the process of genetic recombination and DNA repair. Previously, we demonstrated that BLM can disrupt the RAD51-single-stranded DNA filament that promotes the initial steps of homologous recombination. However, this disruption occurs only if RAD51 is present in an inactive ADP-bound form. Here, we investigate interactions of BLM with the active ATP-bound form of the RAD51-single-stranded DNA filament. Surprisingly, we found that BLM stimulates DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51. In contrast to the helicase activity of BLM, this stimulation does not require ATP hydrolysis. These data suggest a novel BLM function that is stimulation of the RAD51 DNA pairing. Our results demonstrate the important role of the RAD51 nucleoprotein filament conformation in stimulation of DNA pairing by BLM.Mutations of BLM helicase cause Bloom syndrome (BS),² a rare autosomal disorder, which is associated with stunted growth, facial sun sensitivity, immunodeficiency, fertility defects, and a greatly elevated incidence of many types of cancer occurring at an early age (1). BLM belongs to the highly conserved family of RecQ helicases that are required for the maintenance of genome integrity in all organisms (2, 3). There are five RecQ helicases in humans; mutations in three of them, WRN, RECQ4, and BLM, have been associated with the genetic abnormalities known as Werner, Rothmund-Thomson, and Bloom syndrome, respectively (4, 5). The cells from BS patients display genomic instability; the hallmark of BS is an increase in the frequency of sister chromatid and interhomolog exchanges (1, 6). Because homologous recombination (HR) is responsible for chromosomal exchanges, it is thought that BLM helicase functions in regulating HR (7–9). Also, BLM helicase is required for faithful chromosome segregation (10) and repair of stalled replication forks (11, 12), the processes that are linked to HR (13–15). BLM was found to interact physically with RAD51, a key protein of HR (16) that catalyzes the central steps in HR including the search for homology and the exchange of strands between homologous ssDNA and dsDNA sequences (17). In cells, BLM forms nuclear foci, a subset of which co-localize with RAD51. Interestingly, the extent of RAD51 and BLM co-localization increases in response to ionizing radiation, indicating a possible role of BLM in the repair of DNA double-strand breaks (16).Biochemical studies suggest that BLM may perform several different functions in HR. BLM was shown to promote the dissociation of HR intermediates (D-loops) (18–20), branch migration of Holliday junctions (21), and dissolution of double Holliday junctions acting in a complex with TopoIIIα and BLAP75 (22–24). BLM may also facilitate DNA synthesis during the repair process by unwinding the DNA template in front of the replication fork (25). In addition, BLM and its yeast homolog Sgs1 may play a role at the initial steps of DNA double-strand break repair by participating in exonucleolitic resection of the DNA ends to generate DNA molecules with the 3′-ssDNA tails, a substrate for RAD51 binding (26–29).In vivo, the process of HR is tightly regulated by various mechanisms (30). Whereas some proteins promote HR (14, 31), others inhibit this process, thereby preventing its untimely initiation (32, 33). Disruption of the Rad51-ssDNA nucleoprotein filament appears to be an especially important mechanism of controlling HR. This filament disruption activity was demonstrated for the yeast Srs2 helicase (34, 35) and human RECQ5 helicase (36). Recently, we found that BLM can also catalyze disruption of the RAD51-ssDNA filament (25). This disruption only occurs if the filament is present in an inactive ADP-bound form, e.g. in the presence of Mg²⁺. Conversion of RAD51 into an active ATP-bound form, e.g. in the presence of Ca²⁺ (37), renders the filament resistant to BLM disruption (25). In this study, we analyze the interactions of BLM with an active ATP-bound RAD51-ssDNA filament. Surprisingly, we found that BLM stimulates the DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51. Thus, depending on the conformational state of the RAD51 nucleoprotein filament, BLM may either inhibit or stimulate the DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51. Our analysis demonstrated that, in contrast to several known stimulatory proteins that act by promoting formation of the RAD51-ssDNA filament, BLM stimulates the DNA strand exchange activity of RAD51 at a later stage, during synapsis. Stimulation appears to be independent of the ATPase activity of BLM. We suggest that this stimulation of RAD51 may represent a novel function of BLM in homologous recombination.     

Synthesis of Free and Proliferating Cell Nuclear Antigen-bound Polyubiquitin Chains by the RING E3 Ubiquitin Ligase Rad5

In replicating yeast, lysine 63-linked polyubiquitin (polyUb) chains are extended from the ubiquitin moiety of monoubiquitinated proliferating cell nuclear antigen (monoUb-PCNA) by the E2-E3 complex of (Ubc13-Mms2)-Rad5. This promotes error-free bypass of DNA damage lesions. The unusual ability of Ubc13-Mms2 to synthesize unanchored Lys⁶³-linked polyUb chains in vitro allowed us to resolve the individual roles that it and Rad5 play in the catalysis and specificity of PCNA polyubiquitination. We found that Rad5 stimulates the synthesis of free polyUb chains by Ubc13-Mms2 in part by enhancing the reactivity of the Ubc13∼Ub thiolester bond. Polyubiquitination of monoUb-PCNA was further enhanced by interactions between the N-terminal domain of Rad5 and PCNA. Thus, Rad5 acts both to align monoUb-PCNA with Ub-charged Ubc13 and to stimulate Ub transfer onto Lys⁶³ of a Ub acceptor. We also found that Rad5 interacts with PCNA independently of the number of monoubiquitinated subunits in the trimer and that it binds to both unmodified and monoUb-PCNA with similar affinities. These findings indicate that Rad5-mediated recognition of monoUb-PCNA in vivo is likely to depend upon interactions with additional factors at stalled replication forks.DNA is susceptible to chemical alteration by many endogenous and exogenous agents. To counter this threat and maintain genome integrity, eukaryotic cells employ three main strategies: DNA repair pathways that directly reverse DNA damage, cell cycle checkpoints that allow time to repair the damage prior to replication, and DNA damage tolerance (DDT),² which is a method of bypassing DNA damage lesions during the DNA replication phase of the cell cycle.Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) is a key regulatory protein in DNA replication and repair (1). At the replication fork, DNA is encircled by PCNA, a homotrimeric protein that promotes processive movement of the replicative DNA polymerase. Upon DNA damage and subsequent stalling of the replicative polymerase, Ub modifications of PCNA signal DDT, which allows a cell to bypass the lesion and proceed past this potential block in replication (2–4).In the DDT pathway, as in other Ub-dependent pathways, Ub is conjugated to a substrate by the actions of three enzymes, an E1 activating enzyme, an E2 conjugating enzyme, and an E3 ligase (5). The E1 enzyme initiates the pathway in a two-step reaction that utilizes ATP hydrolysis to activate the C terminus of Ub, culminating in the formation of an E1∼Ub thiolester. Subsequent transthiolation to the active site cysteine of the E2 generates an E2∼Ub thiolester. An E3 ligase then brings a substrate into close proximity to the E2∼Ub intermediate, thereby catalyzing the formation of an isopeptide bond between the amino group of a substrate lysine and the C-terminal glycine of Ub. Polyubiquitination occurs when this substrate is another Ub, either free or as part of a Ub-protein conjugate.The DDT pathway is characterized by distinct ubiquitination events on PCNA that occur in two stages (3, 4, 6). The first of these is monoubiquitination of lysine 164 on one or more of the PCNA subunits by the E2-E3 complex of Rad6-Rad18 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae (3, 4, 7). monoUb-PCNA can serve either as a signal for error-prone bypass of the DNA lesion by recruiting translesion polymerases or as a substrate for subsequent polyubiquitination by the E2 heterodimer Ubc13-Mms2 and the E3 ligase Rad5 (3, 4, 8, 9). The polyUb chain extended from the initial Ub moiety on monoUb-PCNA is linked specifically through Ub Lys⁶³ residues. This Lys⁶³-linked chain is thought to enable a template switch mechanism that allows for error-free bypass of the DNA lesion, in part by utilizing the single-strand DNA-dependent helicase activity of Rad5 (3, 4, 10, 11). Both PCNA ubiquitination events promote bypass of the DNA lesion rather than direct removal or repair of the lesion.We have been interested in the mechanism by which the yeast (Ubc13-Mms2)-Rad5 complex catalyzes the formation of Lys⁶³-linked polyUb on PCNA. Previous studies have shown that heterodimerization of the Ubc13-Mms2 E2 is essential for Lys⁶³-specific Ub-Ub conjugation in vitro and in vivo (12–15). Ubc13 is a canonical E2 enzyme with an active site cysteine that receives activated Ub by transthiolation from the E1∼Ub complex (12, 13). This Ub is referred to as the “donor Ub.” Mms2 is a Ub E2 variant protein that lacks the active site cysteine (12, 15); rather, Mms2 binds to a second Ub, the “acceptor Ub,” and positions it to facilitate nucleophilic attack on the Ubc13∼Ub thiolester bond by the ϵ-amine of Lys⁶³ (15, 16). The positioning of the acceptor Ub by Mms2 controls the specificity of polyUb assembly such that only Lys⁶³-linked chains can be formed (16).Ubc13-Mms2 can synthesize Lys⁶³-linked chains in vitro in the absence of a PCNA substrate or an E3 ligase (12, 13). However, unlike the synthesis of free Lys⁶³-linked polyUb chains by Ubc13-Mms2, little is known about the polyubiquitination of PCNA or the role of the Rad5 E3 ligase in these reactions. Rad5 can bind PCNA and Rad18, and it contains a catalytic RING domain that characterizes the largest class of E3 ligases (17–21). There is evidence that RING E3s like Rad5 may play a more active role in ubiquitination than simply bringing the substrate into close proximity with the E2∼Ub. Several RING E3s have been shown to stimulate the synthesis of unanchored polyUb chains or autoubiquitination of their cognate E2s in the absence of substrates (22–24). This stimulation may be related to the ability of RING E3s to enhance reactivity of the E2∼Ub thiolester bond through allosteric effects (25, 26).Using purified recombinant forms of Ubc13, Mms2, and Rad5, we have explored the assembly of free Lys⁶³-linked polyUb chains as well as the extension of a polyUb chain on a synthetic analog of monoUb-PCNA. We show that Rad5 facilitates ubiquitination in part by increasing the reactivity of the Ubc13∼Ub thiolester bond. With monoUb-PCNA substrates, Rad5 also stimulated polyubiquitination through direct interactions with PCNA and recruitment of Ub-charged Ubc13-Mms2. Surprisingly, Rad5 recognition of monoUb-PCNA appeared to depend on interactions only with the PCNA moiety of the conjugate, which suggests that substrate selectivity in vivo is likely to depend on additional factors.     

PTIP Regulates 53BP1 and SMC1 at the DNA Damage Sites

Although PTIP is implicated in the DNA damage response, through interactions with 53BP1, the function of PTIP in the DNA damage response remain elusive. Here, we show that RNF8 controls DNA damage-induced nuclear foci formation of PTIP, which in turn regulates 53BP1 localization to the DNA damage sites. In addition, SMC1, a substrate of ATM, could not be phosphorylated at the DNA damage sites in the absence of PTIP. The PTIP-dependent pathway is important for DNA double strand breaks repair and DNA damage-induced intra-S phase checkpoint activation. Taken together, these results suggest that the role of PTIP in the DNA damage response is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1. Thus, PTIP regulates 53BP1-dependent signaling pathway following DNA damage.The DNA damage response pathways are signal transduction pathways with DNA damage sensors, mediators, and effectors, which are essential for maintaining genomic stability (1–3). Following DNA double strand breaks, histone H2AX at the DNA damage sites is rapidly phosphorylated by ATM/ATR/DNAPK (4–10), a family homologous to phosphoinositide 3-kinases (11, 12). Subsequently, phospho-H2AX (γH2AX) provides the platform for accumulation of a larger group of DNA damage response factors, such as MDC1, BRCA1, 53BP1, and the MRE11·RAD50·NBS1 complex (13, 14), at the DNA damage sites. Translocalization of these proteins to the DNA double strand breaks (DSBs)³ facilitates DNA damage checkpoint activation and enhances the efficiency of DNA damage repair (14, 15).Recently, PTIP (Pax2 transactivation domain-interacting protein, or Paxip) has been identified as a DNA damage response protein and is required for cell survival when exposed to ionizing radiation (IR) (1, 16–18). PTIP is a 1069-amino acid nuclear protein and has been originally identified in a yeast two-hybrid screening as a partner of Pax2 (19). Genetic deletion of the PTIP gene in mice leads to early embryonic lethality at embryonic day 8.5, suggesting that PTIP is essential for early embryonic development (20). Structurally, PTIP contains six tandem BRCT (BRCA1 carboxyl-terminal) domains (16–18, 21). The BRCT domain is a phospho-group binding domain that mediates protein-protein interactions (17, 22, 23). Interestingly, the BRCT domain has been found in a large number of proteins involved in the cellular response to DNA damages, such as BRCA1, MDC1, and 53BP1 (7, 24–29). Like other BRCT domain-containing proteins, upon exposure to IR, PTIP forms nuclear foci at the DSBs, which is dependent on its BRCT domains (16–18). By protein affinity purification, PTIP has been found in two large complexes. One includes the histone H3K4 methyltransferase ALR and its associated cofactors, the other contains DNA damage response proteins, including 53BP1 and SMC1 (30, 31). Further experiments have revealed that DNA damage enhances the interaction between PTIP and 53BP1 (18, 31).To elucidate the DNA damage response pathways, we have examined the upstream and downstream partners of PTIP. Here, we report that PTIP is downstream of RNF8 and upstream of 53BP1 in response to DNA damage. Moreover, PTIP and 53BP1 are required for the phospho-ATM association with the chromatin, which phosphorylates SMC1 at the DSBs. This PTIP-dependent pathway is involved in DSBs repair.     

Increased Protein Stability of FGF1 Can Compensate for Its Reduced Affinity for Heparin

Human FGF1 (fibroblast growth factor 1) is a powerful signaling molecule with a short half-life in vivo and a denaturation temperature close to physiological. Binding to heparin increases the stability of FGF1 and is believed to be important in the formation of FGF1·fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) active complex. In order to reveal the function of heparin in FGF1·FGFR complex formation and signaling, we constructed several FGF1 variants with reduced affinity for heparin and with diverse stability. We determined their biophysical properties and biological activities as well as their ability to translocate across cellular membranes. Our study showed that increased thermodynamic stability of FGF1 nicely compensates for decreased binding of heparin in FGFR activation, induction of DNA synthesis, and cell proliferation. By stepwise introduction of stabilizing mutations into the K118E (K132E) FGF1 variant that shows reduced affinity for heparin and is inactive in stimulation of DNA synthesis, we were able to restore the full mitogenic activity of this mutant. Our results indicate that the main role of heparin in FGF-induced signaling is to protect this naturally unstable protein against heat and/or proteolytic degradation and that heparin is not essential for a direct FGF1-FGFR interaction and receptor activation.FGF1 (fibroblast growth factor 1) belongs to a family of polypeptide growth factors comprising in humans 22 structurally related proteins (1, 2). The signaling induced by the growth factor leads to a wide range of cellular responses during development as well as in adult life, such as growth regulation, differentiation, survival, stress response, migration, and proliferation of different cell types (3). The biological activity of FGF1 is exerted through binding to four high affinity cell surface receptors (FGFR1–4), resulting in receptor dimerization and transphosphorylation in its tyrosine kinase domain (4, 5). The activated FGFR³ induces cellular response by initiating several signaling cascades, including mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK), phosphoinositide 3-kinase/Akt, and phospholipase C-γ (PLC-γ) pathways (6).In addition to FGFRs, FGF1 binds to heparan sulfates (HS) associated with proteoglycans at the cell surface and in the extracellular matrix (7). Among the physiological sugars, the highest affinity for FGF1 is shown by heparin, a widely used linear, highly sulfated polysaccharide composed of 2-O-sulfated iduronic acid and 6-O-sulfated, N-sulfated glucosamine units (8).Despite many years of research, there is still controversy regarding the molecular role of heparin/HS in FGF1- and FGF2-induced signaling. Thus, the question of whether or not the linkage of two molecules of the growth factor by heparin/HS is an absolute prerequisite for induction of FGFR dimerization is still open. Numerous studies have concluded that the presence of heparin/HS is obligatory for FGF signaling. It is widely believed that heparin/HS is directly involved in receptor dimerization and is critical for mitogenic response stimulated by the growth factor (4, 6, 8–10).On the other hand, several authors working on FGF1 and FGF2 have suggested that there is no mandatory requirement for heparin for the assembly and activation of the FGF·FGFR complex. They imply that heparin only plays a role in association of two molecules of the growth factor and therefore facilitates their binding to FGFR (11). It has been reported that FGF1 and FGF2 can interact with the FGFR and trigger phosphorylation of p42/44 MAPK and activation of other signaling pathways even in the absence of HS (12–16).The accepted role of heparin/HS in FGF1 signaling is to prevent the degradation of the growth factor (17). The interaction with heparin or HS protects FGF1 against heat, acidic pH, and proteases (18, 19). HS also seems to regulate the activity of different FGFs by creating their local reservoir and generating a concentration gradient of the growth factor (6, 17).The binding of FGF1 to heparin/HS is mediated by specific residues forming a positively charged patch on the protein surface (20, 21). The major contribution is made by Lys¹¹⁸ (Lys¹³² in the full-length numbering system), which was identified by Harper and Lobb (22), and Lys¹¹² and Arg¹²² (23, 24). Additional residues of FGF1 involved in the interaction with heparin are the positively charged Lys¹¹³, Arg¹¹⁹, and Lys¹²⁸ and the polar Asn¹⁸, Asn¹¹⁴, and Gln¹²⁷ (20, 21). Site-directed mutagenesis and other studies have revealed the importance of Lys¹¹⁸ not only in heparin binding but also for the biological function of FGF1 (22, 25, 26). It was shown that the K118E (K132E) mutant is inactive in stimulation of DNA synthesis, although its affinity for FGFR and the ability to activate signaling cascades is not reduced (27, 28). Despite extensive research, the reason for the lack of mitogenic potential of K118E FGF1 is still not clear.In this paper, we verified the function of heparin in FGF1·FGFR complex formation and signaling by constructing several FGF1 mutants with reduced affinity for heparin. To recover the stability of these variants, which could no longer be stabilized by heparin, we supplemented them stepwise with stabilizing mutations (29). We analyzed thoroughly their biological activity and their ability to translocate across cellular membranes (30–34). Interestingly, the full mitogenic activity of the K118E FGF1 variant was restored by the introduced stabilizing mutations.Our results indicate that the main role of heparin in FGF-induced signaling is to protect this naturally unstable protein against heat denaturation and proteolytic degradation and that the increased stability of the growth factor can compensate for reduced heparin binding.     

Localization and Targeting of an Unusual Pyridine Nucleotide Transhydrogenase in Entamoeba histolytica

Pyridine nucleotide transhydrogenase (PNT) catalyzes the direct transfer of a hydride-ion equivalent between NAD(H) and NADP(H) in bacteria and the mitochondria of eukaryotes. PNT was previously postulated to be localized to the highly divergent mitochondrion-related organelle, the mitosome, in the anaerobic/microaerophilic protozoan parasite Entamoeba histolytica based on the potential mitochondrion-targeting signal. However, our previous proteomic study of isolated phagosomes suggested that PNT is localized to organelles other than mitosomes. An immunofluorescence assay using anti-E. histolytica PNT (EhPNT) antibody raised against the NADH-binding domain showed a distribution to the membrane of numerous vesicles/vacuoles, including lysosomes and phagosomes. The domain(s) required for the trafficking of PNT to vesicles/vacuoles was examined by using amoeba transformants expressing a series of carboxyl-terminally truncated PNTs fused with green fluorescent protein or a hemagglutinin tag. All truncated PNTs failed to reach vesicles/vacuoles and were retained in the endoplasmic reticulum. These data indicate that the putative targeting signal is not sufficient for the trafficking of PNT to the vesicular/vacuolar compartments and that full-length PNT is necessary for correct transport. PNT displayed a smear of >120 kDa on SDS-PAGE gels. PNGase F and tunicamycin treatment, chemical degradation of carbohydrates, and heat treatment of PNT suggested that the apparent aberrant mobility of PNT is likely attributable to its hydrophobic nature. PNT that is compartmentalized to the acidic compartments is unprecedented in eukaryotes and may possess a unique physiological role in E. histolytica.Pyridine nucleotide transhydrogenase (PNT) participates in the bioenergetic processes of the cell. PNT generally resides on the cytoplasmic membranes of bacteria and the inner membrane of mammalian mitochondria (3, 16) and utilizes the electrochemical proton gradient across the membrane to drive NADPH formation from NADH (14, 15, 39) according to the reaction H⁺out + NADH + NADP⁺↔H⁺in + NAD⁺ + NADPH, where “out” and “in” denote the cytosol and the matrix of the mitochondria, or the periplasmic space and the cytosol of bacteria, respectively.PNT has been identified in several protozoan parasites, including Entamoeba histolytica (8, 51), Eimeria tenella (17, 47), Mastigamoeba balamuthi (11) Plasmodium falciparum (10), Plasmodium yoelii (6), and Plasmodium berghei (12). In general, PNT contains conserved structural units consisting of three domains, the NAD(H)-binding domain (domain I [dI]) and the NADP(H)-binding domain (domain III [dIII]), both of which face the matrix side of the eukaryotic mitochondria or the cytoplasmic side in bacteria, and the hydrophobic domain (domain II [dII]), containing 11 to 13 transmembrane regions. PNT from E. tenella and E. histolytica exists as a single polypeptide in an unusual configuration consisting of dIIb-dIII-dI-dIIa, with a 38-amino-acid-long linker region between dIII and dI (48).E. histolytica, previously considered an “amitochondriate” protist, is currently considered to possess a mitochondrion-related organelle with reduced and divergent functions, the mitosome (1, 21, 23a, 26, 42). Our recent proteomic study of isolated mitosomes identified about 20 new constituents (26), together with four proteins previously demonstrated in E. histolytica mitosomes: Cpn60 (8, 19, 21, 42), Cpn10 (46), mitochondrial Hsp70 (2, 44), and mitochondrion carrier family (MCF) (ADP/ATP transporter) (7). Despite the early presumption of PNT being localized in mitosomes (8), based on the amino-terminal region rich in hydroxylated (five serines and threonines) and acidic (three glutamates) amino acids, which slightly resembles known mitochondrion- and hydrogenosome-targeting sequences (8, 35), PNT was not discovered in the mitosome proteome. We also doubted this premise because PNT was one of the major proteins identified in isolated phagosomes (32, 33). Thus, the intracellular localization and trafficking of PNT remain unknown.In this report, we showed that E. histolytica PNT (EhPNT) is localized to various vesicles and vacuoles, including lysosomes and phagosomes, using wild-type amoebae and antiserum raised against recombinant EhPNT and an E. histolytica line expressing EhPNT with a carboxyl-terminal hemagglutinin (HA) epitope tag and anti-HA antibody. We also showed that all domains of EhPNT are required for its trafficking to the acidic compartment by using amoeba transformants expressing the HA tag or green fluorescent protein (GFP) fused with a region containing various domains of EhPNT.