Cross-linked long-pitch actin dimer forms stoichiometric complexes with gelsolin segment 1 and/or deoxyribonuclease I that nonproductively interact with myosin subfragment 1

Actin dimer cross-linked along the long pitch of the F-actin helix by N-(4-azido)-2-nitrophenyl (ANP) was purified by gel filtration. Purified dimers were found to polymerize on increasing the ionic strength, although at reduced rate and extent in comparison with native actin. Purified actin dimer interacts with the actin-binding proteins (ABPs) deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I) and gelsolin segment-1 (G1) as analyzed by gel filtration and native gel electrophoresis. Complex formation of the actin dimer with these ABPs inhibits its ability to polymerize. The interaction with rabbit skeletal muscle myosin subfragment 1 (S1) was analyzed for polymerized actin dimer and dimer complexed with gelsolin segment 1 or DNase I by measurement of the actin-stimulated myosin S1-ATPase and gel filtration. The data obtained indicate binding of subfragment 1 to actin dimer, albeit with considerably lower affinity than to F-actin. Polymerized actin dimer was able to stimulate the S1-ATPase activity to about 50% of the level of native F-actin. In contrast, the actin dimer complexed to DNase I or gelsolin segment 1 or to both proteins was unable to significantly stimulate the S1-ATPase. Similarly, G1:dimer complex at 20 microM stimulated the rate of release of subfragment 1 bound nucleotide (mant-ADP) only 1.6-fold in comparison to about 9-fold by native F-actin at a concentration of 0.5 microM. Using rapid kinetic techniques, a dissociation constant of 2.4 x 10 (-6) M for subfragment 1 binding to G1:dimer was determined in comparison to 3 x 10 (-8) M for native F-actin under identical conditions. Since the rate of association of subfragment 1 to G1:dimer was considerably lower than to native F-actin, we suspect that the ATP-hydrolysis by S1 was catalyzed before its association to the dimer. These data suggest an altered, nonproductive mode for the interaction of subfragment 1 with the isolated long-pitch actin dimer.     

The dynamics of the interaction between myosin subfragment 1 and pyrene-labelled thin filaments, from rabbit skeletal muscle

We have used actin labelled in Cys-374 with N-(1-pyrenyl)iodoacetamide to monitor the dynamics and equilibria of the interaction between myosin subfragment 1 and the actin-troponin-tropomyosin complex in the presence of calcium. These results are compared with those obtained for pure actin and myosin subfragment 1. The sensitivity of this fluorescent label allowed us to measure the binding affinity of myosin subfragment 1 for actin directly by fluorescence titration. The affinity of subfragment 1 for actin is increased sixfold by troponin-tropomyosin in the presence of calcium. Kinetic studies of the interaction of subfragment 1 and actin have revealed an isomerization of the actin-subfragment 1 complex from a state in which actin is weakly bound (Ka = 5.9 X 10(4) M-1) to a more tightly bound complex (Ka = 1.7 X 10(7) M-1) (Coates, Criddle & Geeves (1985) Biochem. J. 232, 351). Results in the presence of troponin-tropomyosin show the same isomerization. The sixfold increase in affinity of subfragment 1 for actin is shown to be due to a decrease in the rate of dissociation of actin from the weakly bound complex.     

Myosin binding surface on actin probed by hydroxyl radical footprinting and site-directed labels

Actin and myosin are the two main proteins required for cell motility and muscle contraction. The structure of their strongly bound complex—rigor state—is a key for delineating the functional mechanism of actomyosin motor. Current knowledge of that complex is based on models obtained from the docking of known atomic structures of actin and myosin subfragment 1 (S1; the head and neck region of myosin) into low-resolution electron microscopy electron density maps, which precludes atomic- or side-chain-level information. Here, we use radiolytic protein footprinting for global mapping of sites across the actin molecules that are impacted directly or allosterically by myosin binding to actin filaments. Fluorescence and electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopies and cysteine actin mutants are used for independent, residue-specific probing of S1 effects on two structural elements of actin. We identify actin residue candidates involved in S1 binding and provide experimental evidence to discriminate between the regions of hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions. Focusing on the role of the DNase I binding loop (D-loop) and the W-loop residues of actin in their interactions with S1, we found that the emission properties of acrylodan and the mobility of electron paramagnetic resonance spin labels attached to cysteine mutants of these residues change strongly and in a residue-specific manner upon S1 binding, consistent with the recently proposed direct contacts of these loops with S1. As documented in this study, the direct and indirect changes on actin induced by myosin are more extensive than known until now and attest to the importance of actin dynamics to actomyosin function.     

Expression of a nonpolymerizable actin mutant in Sf9 cells

We have succeeded in expressing actin in the baculovirus/Sf9 cell system in high yield. The wild-type (WT) actin is functionally indistinguishable from tissue-purified actin in its ability to activate ATPase activity and to support movement in an in vitro motility assay. Having achieved this feat, we used a mutational strategy to express a monomeric actin that is incapable of polymerization. Native actin requires actin binding proteins or chemical modification to maintain it in a monomeric state. The mutant actin sediments in the analytical ultracentrifuge as a homogeneous monomeric species of 3.2 S in 100 mM KCl and 2 mM MgCl(2), conditions that cause WT actin to polymerize. The two point mutations that render actin nonpolymerizable are in subdomain 4 (A204E/P243K; "AP-actin"), distant from the myosin binding site. AP-actin binds to skeletal myosin subfragment 1 (S1) and forms a homogeneous complex as demonstrated by analytical ultracentrifugation. The ATPase activity of a cross-linked AP-actin.S1 complex is higher than that of S1 alone, although less than that supported by filamentous actin (F-actin). AP-Actin is an excellent candidate for structural studies of complexes of actin with motor proteins and other actin-binding proteins.     

Identification of a deoxyribonuclease I inhibitor from a phage-peptide library

Deoxyribonuclease I (DNase I) is a divalent cation dependent endonuclease and thought to be a significant barrier to effective gene delivery. The only known DNase I-specific inhibitor is monomeric actin which acts by forming a 1:1 complex with DNase I. Its use, however, is restricted because of tendency to polymerize under certain conditions. We screened two random phage peptide libraries of complexity 10(8) and 10(9) for DNase I binders as candidates for DNase I inhibitors. A number of DNase I-binding peptide sequences were identified. When these peptides were expressed as fusion proteins with Escherichia coli maltose binding protein, they inhibited the actin-DNase I interaction (IC50 = 0.1-0.7 microM) and DNA degradation by DNase I (IC50 = 0.8-8 microM). Plasmid protection activity in the presence of DNase I was also observed with the fusion proteins. These peptides have the potential to be a useful adjuvant for gene therapy using naked DNA.     

The Hill model for binding myosin S1 to regulated actin is not equivalent to the McKillop-Geeves model

The Hill two-state cooperativity model and the McKillop-Geeves (McK-G) three-state model predict very similar binding traces of myosin subfragment 1 (S1) binding to regulated actin filaments in the presence and absence of calcium, and both fit the experimental data reasonably well [Chen et al., Biophys. J., 80, 2338-2349]. Here, we compared the Hill model and the McK-G model for binding myosin S1 to regulated actin against three sets of experimental data: the titration of regulated actin with S1 and the kinetics of S1 binding of regulated actin with either excess S1 to actin or excess actin to S1. Each data set was collected for a wide range of specified calcium concentrations. Both models were able to generate reasonable fits to the time course data and to titration data. The McK-G model can fit all three data sets with the same calcium-concentration-sensitive parameters. Only K(B) and K(T) show significant calcium dependence, and the parameters have a classic pCa curve. A unique set of the Hill model parameters was extremely difficult to estimate from the best fits of multiple sets of data. In summary, the McK-G cooperativity model more uniquely resolves parameters estimated from kinetic and titration data than the Hill model, predicts a sigmoidal dependence of key parameters with calcium concentration, and is simpler and more suitable for practical use.     

The N-terminal fragment of gelsolin inhibits the interaction of DNase I with isolated actin, but not with the cofilin-actin complex

Apoptosis is essential in embryonic development, clonal selection of cells of the immune system and in the prevention of cancer. Apoptotic cells display characteristic changes in morphology that precede the eventual fragmentation of nuclear DNA resulting in cell death. Current evidence implicates DNase I as responsible for hydrolysis of DNA during apoptosis. In vivo, it is likely that cytoplasmic actin binds and inhibits the enzymatic activity and nuclear translocation of DNase I and that disruption of the actin-DNase I complex results in activation of DNase I. In this report we demonstrate that the N-terminal fragment of gelsolin (N-gelsolin) disrupts the actin-DNase I interaction. This provides a molecular mechanism for the role of the N-gelsolin in regulating DNase I activity. We also show that cofilin stabilises the actin-DNase I complex by forming a ternary complex that prevents N-gelsolin from releasing DNase I from actin. We suggest that both cofilin and gelsolin are essential in modulating the release of DNase I from actin.     

A DNase I binding/immunoprecipitation assay for actin

An actin assay which employs the competition between labeled and unlabeled rabbit skeletal muscle actin for DNase I has been developed. Iodination of actin by the method of Bolton and Hunter results in the incorporation of approximately 0.5 mol of 125-iodine/incorporation of approximately 0.5 mol of 125-iodine/mol of actin. This 125I-actin retained the ability to bind to DNase I and inhibit enzymatic activity. The 125I-actin-DNase complex can be precipitated by the addition of a monospecific rabbit antibody to DNase I. The efficiency of this immunoprecipitation step is improved by the use of a second sheep anti-rabbit gamma-globulin. Using this immunoprecipitation assay, there is a linear displacement of the DNase I-bound 125I-actin by rabbit skeletal muscle actin standards or by the actin present in tissue and cell extracts. Using 17.5 ng of DNase I and approximately 500 pg of 125I-actin, 50% inhibition of binding was obtained with 23 ng of unlabeled actin. Reducing the amount of DNase I to 2 ng results in 50% inhibition of binding with 4 ng of unlabeled actin and an increase in the estimated sensitivity of the assay from 1.7 to 0.24 ng. The slopes of the displacement curves generated with both vertebrate and invertebrate non-muscle actins are parallel to rabbit skeletal muscle actin. This observation indicates approximately equal actin-DNase I binding affinities and suggests a high degree of conservation of the actin-DNase I binding site. The assay is useful for measuring the pools of F- and G-actin in a wide range of cells.     

An 18K protein from ascites hepatoma cell depolymerizes actin filaments rapidly

Several actin binding proteins were isolated from ascites hepatoma cells AH7974 by DNase I affinity chromatography. Among them, a protein having a molecular weight of 18,000 was further purified by DEAE cellulose and hydroxyapatite column chromatographies and gel filtration on a Sephadex G-75 column. The 18K protein not only inhibits actin polymerization but also depolymerizes actin filaments. This conclusion was supported by viscosity and fluorescence intensity measurements and the DNase I inhibition assay. A chemical cross-linking experiment suggested that the 18K protein binds to monomeric actin and forms and 18K-actin 1:1 complex. The net depolymerization rate by the 18K protein measured by the DNase I inhibition assay was slower than the rapid reduction of the fluorescence intensity of pyrene-labeled F-actin upon addition of the 18K protein. This result suggests that the 18K protein not only binds to monomeric actin but also binds to actin filaments directly. The sedimentation assay showed that a part of the 18K protein was cosedimented with actin filaments. Electron microscopic observations demonstrated that the 18K protein decreased the amount of actin filaments and the remaining filaments appeared to be decorated and distorted by the 18K protein. The 18K protein had no Ca2+ ion sensitivity and exhibited the same effect on both this tumor actin and muscle actin.     

Interactions among serum vitamin D binding protein, monomeric actin, profilin, and profilactin

Human serum vitamin D binding protein (hDBP), a 58-kDa inter-alpha-globulin, is known to bind, monomeric actin (G-actin) in equimolar quantities. Using monoclonal and polyclonal anti-hDBP antibodies, hDBP, and radioiodinated actin, we developed a reliable saturation assay for actin bound to hDBP. By utilizing this assay, kinetic analysis, and ultracentrifugal sedimentation in sucrose gradients, these proteins' binding affinities (Kd = 10(-9) M) were demonstrated to be 10- to 100-fold greater than earlier estimates. At 4 degrees C, hDBP has an association rate constant of 2.2 x 10(4) M-1 s-1 and a rate of dissociation displaying a t1/2 of 22 h. This high affinity binding was largely unaffected by conditions favoring actin filament formation (1 mM MgCl2 and/or 50 mM KCl), by the range of pH from 6.8 to 8.6 or by temperatures from 4 to 37 degrees C. Compared with ATP-alpha-actin, a 2-fold decrease of binding affinity was observed for the nonmuscle isoactins (beta,gamma), ADP-G-alpha-actin, and N'-ethylmaleimide-modified G-alpha-actin. The 25-hydroxyvitamin D3 and 1 alpha,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 holo-sterol forms of hDBP bound actin in a manner indistinguishable from the apo-sterol hDBP. The common polymorphisms of hDBP (DBP1 slow, DBP1 fast, and DBP2) were shown to have an equal avidity for G-actin binding. Human platelet profilin competed with hDBP for binding to G-actin, but was 1000-fold less potent (Ki = 1.9 microM). When platelet profilactin was incubated with hDBP, profilin was liberated and hDBP-actin complexes formed. DNase I, which forms a triprotein complex with hDBP-G actin, did not alter the affinity of binding of actin by hDBP. The very high affinity binding observed, which was largely unaffected by the state of G-actin, pH, and ionic conditions, appears to support a constitutive role for plasma DBP in the sequestration of actin monomers, as well as actin from actin-profilin complexes, that are liberated during cell injury.     

Actomyosin kinetics and in vitro motility of wild-type Drosophila actin and the effects of two mutations in the Act88F gene.

Two missense mutations of the flight muscle-specific actin gene of Drosophila melanogaster, Act88F, assemble into normally structured myofibrils but affect the flight ability of flies and the mechanical kinetics of isolated muscle fibers. We describe the isolation of actin from different homozygous Act88F strains, including wild-type, an Act88F null mutant (KM88), and two Act88F single point mutations (E316K and G368E), their biochemical interactions with rabbit myosin subfragment 1 (S1), and behavior with rabbit myosin and heavy meromyosin in in vitro motility assays. The rabbit and wild-type Drosophila actins have different association rate constants with S1 (2.64 and 1.77 microM-1 s-1, respectively) and in vitro motilities (2.51, 1.60 microns s-1) clearly demonstrating an isoform-specific difference. The G368E mutation shows a reduced affinity for rabbit S1 compared with the wild type (increasing from 0.11 to 0.17 microM) and a reduced velocity in vitro (reduced by 19%). The E316K mutant actin has no change in affinity for myosin S1 or in vitro motility with heavy meromyosin but does have a reduced in vitro motility (15%) with myosin. These results are discussed with respect to the recently published atomic models for the actomyosin structure and our findings that G368E fibers show a reduced rate constant for delayed tension development and increased fiber stiffness. We interpret these results as possibly caused either by effects on A1 myosin light chain binding or conformational changes within the subdomain 1 of actin, which contains the myosin binding site. E316K is discussed with respect to its likely position within the tropomyosin binding site of actin.     

Site-specific mutations in the myosin binding sites of actin affect structural transitions that control myosin binding.

We have examined the effects of actin mutations on myosin binding, detected by cosedimentation, and actin structural dynamics, detected by spectroscopic probes. Specific mutations were chosen that have been shown to affect the functional interactions of actin and myosin, two mutations (4Ac and E99A/E100A) in the proposed region of weak binding to myosin and one mutation (I341A) in the proposed region of strong binding. In the absence of nucleotide and salt, S1 bound to both wild-type and mutant actins with high affinity (K(d) < microM), but either ADP or increased ionic strength decreased this affinity. This decrease was more pronounced for actins with mutations that inhibit functional interaction with myosin (E99A/E100A and I341A) than for a mutation that enhances the interaction (4Ac). The mutations E99A/E100A and I341A affected the microsecond time scale dynamics of actin in the absence of myosin, but the 4Ac mutation did not have any effect. The binding of myosin eliminated these effects of mutations on structural dynamics; i.e., the spectroscopic signals from mutant actins bound to S1 were the same as those from wild-type actin. These results indicate that mutations in the myosin binding sites affect structural transitions within actin that control strong myosin binding, without affecting the structural dynamics of the strongly bound actomyosin complex.     

Electrostatic contributions to the binding of myosin and myosin-MgADP to F-actin in solution

The ionic strength dependence of skeletal myosin subfragment 1 (S1) binding to unregulated F-actin was measured in solutions containing from 0 to 0.50 M added lithium acetate (LiOAc) in the absence and presence of MgADP. The data were analyzed by using a theory based on an ion interaction model that is rigorous for high ionic strength solutions [Pitzer, K. S. (1973) J. Phys. Chem. 77, 268-277] in order to obtain values for K, the equilibrium association constant when the ionic strength is zero, and for [zMzA[, the absolute value of the product of the net electric charges of the actin binding site on myosin (zM) and the myosin binding site on actin (zA). The presence of MgADP reduced K by a factor of 10, as expected, and reduced [zMzA[ by about 1 esu2. Because the presence of MgADP is not likely to change the net charge of the myosin binding site on actin, these data are consistent with a model in which MgADP binding to S1 reduces its affinity for actin by a mechanism that reduces the net electric charge of the acting binding site on S1. The value of [zMzA[ in the absence of ADP was 8.1 +/- 0.9 esu2, which, if one uses integer values, suggests that zM and zA are in the 8+ to 1+ esu and 1- to 8- esu ranges, respectively. ADP binding then reduces zM to the 7+ to 0.88+ esu range.     

The interaction of actin monomers with myosin heads and other muscle proteins.

The simplest interacting unit of actomyosin, viz., single myosin heads (subfragment 1) with actin monomers, has been studied at physiological ionic strength, by isolating the actin molecules from each other on a solid support. The interaction is characterized by a binding constant of 10(5) to 10(6) M-1 in the temperature range 4-30degrees C. It is endothermic with a standard enthalpy of 24 +/- 10 kcal mol-1, and a standard entropy of 110 +/- 40 eu. It is thus, like many protein-protein association processes, entropy-driven. Despite the high affinity of the association, which is comparable in its binding constant to that of subfragment 1 with F-actin, there is only very small activation of myosin ATPase. The ionic-strength dependence of the interaction shows unusual features. Binding of the proteins of the relaxing system to the monomeric actin was also examined: troponin binds both in the presence and absence of calcium ions, but neither tropomyosin nor the tropomyosin-troponin complex was found to bind significantly. Monomeric actin has also been examined as a function of ionic strength by spectroscopic methods; it appears that conformational differences between the G and the F state are the consequence of polymerization, and not of the change in ionic strength required to being the conversion about.     

Characterizations of cross-bridges in the presence of saturating concentrations of MgAMP-PNP in rabbit permeabilized psoas muscle.

Several earlier studies have led to different conclusions about the complex of myosin with MgAMP-PNP. It has been suggested that subfragment 1 of myosin (S1)-MgAMP-PNP forms an S1-MgADP-like state, an intermediate between the myosin S1-MgATP and myosin S1-MgADP states or a mixture of cross-bridge states. We suggest that the different states observed result from the failure to saturate S1 with MgAMP-PNP. At saturating MgAMP-PNP, the interaction of myosin S1 with actin is very similar to that which occurs in the presence of MgATP. 1) At 1 degrees C and 170 mM ionic strength the equatorial x-ray diffraction intensity ratio I11/I10 decreased with an increasing MgAMP-PNP concentration and leveled off by approximately 20 mM MgAMP-PNP. The resulting ratio was the same for MgATP-relaxed fibers. 2) The two dimensional x-ray diffraction patterns from MgATP-relaxed and MgAMP-PNP-relaxed bundles are similar. 3) The affinity of S1-MgAMP-PNP for the actin-tropomyosin-troponin complex in solution in the absence of free calcium is comparable with that of S1-MgATP. 4) In the presence of calcium, I11/I10 decreased toward the relaxed value with increasing MgAMP-PNP, signifying that the affinity between cross-bridge and actin is weakened by MgAMP-PNP. 5) The degree to which the equatorial intensity ratio decreases as the ionic strength increases is similar in MgAMP-PNP and MgATP. Therefore, results from both fiber and solution studies suggest that MgAMP-PNP acts as a non hydrolyzable MgATP analogue for myosin.     

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer within the complex formed by actin and myosin subfragment 1. Comparison between weakly and strongly attached states

Fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements have been made between Cys-374 on actin and Cys-177 on the alkali light chain of myosin subfragment 1 (S1) using several pairs of donor-acceptor chromophores. The labeled light chain was exchanged into subfragment 1 and the resulting fluorescently labeled subfragment 1 isolated by ion-exchange chromatography on SP-Trisacryl. The efficiency of energy transfer was measured by steady-state fluorescence in a strong binding complex of acto-S1 and found to represent a spatial separation between the two probes of 5.6-6.3 nm. The same measurements were then made with weak binding acto-S1 complexes generated in two ways. First, actin was complexed with p-phenylenedimaleimide-S1, a stable analogue of S1-adenosine 5'-triphosphate (ATP), obtained by cross-linking the SH1 and SH2 heavy-chain thiols of subfragment 1 [Greene, L. E., Chalovich, J. M., & Eisenberg, E. (1986) Biochemistry 25, 704-709]. Large increases in transfer efficiency indicated that the two probes had moved closer together by some 3 nm. Second, weak binding complexes were formed between subfragment 1 and actin in the presence of the regulatory proteins troponin and tropomyosin, the absence of calcium, and the presence of ATP [Chalovich, J. M., & Eisenberg, E. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 2432-2437]. The measured efficiency of energy transfer again indicated that the distance between the two labeled sites had moved closer by about 3 nm. These data support the idea that there is a considerable difference in the structure of the acto-S1 complex between the weakly and strongly bound states.     

Mechanism of nucleotide binding to actomyosin VI: evidence for allosteric head-head communication

We have examined the kinetics of nucleotide binding to actomyosin VI by monitoring the fluorescence of pyrene-labeled actin filaments. ATP binds single-headed myosin VI following a two-step reaction mechanism with formation of a low affinity collision complex (1/K(1)' = 5.6 mm) followed by isomerization (k(+2)' = 176 s-1) to a state with weak actin affinity. The rates and affinity for ADP binding were measured by kinetic competition with ATP. This approach allows a broader range of ADP concentrations to be examined than with fluorescent nucleotide analogs, permitting the identification and characterization of transiently populated intermediates in the pathway. ADP binding to actomyosin VI, as with ATP binding, occurs via a two-step mechanism. The association rate constant for ADP binding is approximately five times greater than for ATP binding because of a higher affinity in the collision complex (1/K(5b)' = 2.2 mm) and faster isomerization rate constant (k(+5a)' = 366 s(-1)). By equilibrium titration, both heads of a myosin VI dimer bind actin strongly in rigor and with bound ADP. In the presence of ATP, conditions that favor processive stepping, myosin VI does not dwell with both heads strongly bound to actin, indicating that the second head inhibits strong binding of the lead head to actin. With both heads bound strongly, ATP binding is accelerated 2.5-fold, and ADP binding is accelerated >10-fold without affecting the rate of ADP release. We conclude that the heads of myosin VI communicate allosterically and accelerate nucleotide binding, but not dissociation, when both are bound strongly to actin.     

Covalent modification of G-actin by pyridoxal 5'-phosphate: polymerization properties and interaction with DNase I and myosin subfragment 1.

Pyridoxal 5'-phosphate (PLP), a lysine-specific reagent, has been used to modify G-actin. At pH 7.5, PLP reacted with 1.7-2 lysines on G-actin. Limited proteolytic digestion experiments indicated that, in agreement with previous works, essentially lysine-61 was modified in a 1:1 fashion by PLP, other lysines being much less reactive. A PLP-derivatized affinity label of ATP binding sites, AMPPLP, reacted with two additional lysines that do not appear to be located in the ATP site on G-actin. PLP-G-actin did not polymerize spontaneously up to 30 microM; however, it retained other essential native properties of G-actin. PLP-actin bound to the barbed ends of actin filaments with an equilibrium dissociation constant of 4 microM and prevented dilution-induced depolymerization like a capping protein. PLP-actin copolymerized with unmodified actin. The stability of F-actin copolymers decreased with the fraction of PLP-actin incorporated, consistent with a model within which the actin-PLP-actin interactions in the copolymer are 50-fold weaker, and PLP-actin-PLP-actin interactions are 200-fold weaker than regular actin-actin interactions. PLP-actin bound DNase I with an equilibrium association constant of 2 nM-1, i.e., 10-fold lower than that of unmodified actin. PLP modification did not affect the binding of G-actin to myosin subfragment 1. However, polymerization of PLP-actin by myosin subfragment 1 was not observed in low ionic strength buffers, whereas PLP-F-actin-S1 filaments, in which the stoichiometry PLP-actin:S1 is 1:1, were formed with an apparent critical concentration of 4.5 microM in the presence of 0.1 M KCl.     

Actomyosin regulatory properties of yeast tropomyosin are dependent upon N-terminal modification

The yeast tropomyosin 1 gene (TPM1) encodes the major isoform of the two tropomyosins (Tm) found in yeast. The gene has been expressed in E. coli and the protein purified. The gene product (yTm1) is a 199-amino acid protein that has a low affinity for actin compared to the native yTm1 purified from yeast. Mass spectrometry shows that the native protein is acetylated while the recombinant protein is not. A series of yTm1 N-terminal constructs were made with either an Ala-Ser dipeptide extension previously shown to restore actin binding to skeletal muscle Tm or the natural extension found in fibroblast Tm 5a/b. All constructs bound actin tightly and showed similar CD spectra and thermal stability. All constructs induced cooperativity in the equilibrium binding of myosin subfragment 1, to actin but the binding curves differed significantly between the constructs. The apparent cooperative unit size (n) and closed/open equilibrium (K(T)) were determined using a fluorescence titration technique [Maytum et al. (1998) Biophys. J. 74, A347]. The data could be accounted for by changes in K(T) (0.1-1) with no change in n. Values of n were approximately twice the structural unit size (5 actin sites). The presence of yTm on actin had little effect upon the overall affinity of S1 for actin despite showing an ability to regulate the acto-myosin interaction. These results show that the short yTm can aid our understanding of actomyosin regulation and that the N-terminus of Tm has a major influence upon its regulatory properties.     

Gelsolin binds to polymeric actin at a low rate.

Association of gelsolin with actin filament subunits was investigated by the decrease of the fluorescence intensity of a 7-nitro-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (NBD) label covalently linked to gelsolin. The rate constant of this reaction was found to be 4 x 10(3) M-1 s-1. Binding of NBD-labeled gelsolin to monomeric actin proceeds at a similar low rate. The rate of association of gelsolin that was unmodified to actin filament subunits was estimated too. Unmodified gelsolin was added to a mixture of actin filaments and actin-DNase I complex. The fractions of gelsolin that bound to actin filament subunits or to actin-DNase I complex depended on the relative rates of these two competing reactions. In this way it was possible to estimate the rate constant of association of unmodified gelsolin with actin filament subunits (2 x 10(4) M-1 s-1). Thus, gelsolin associates with actin filament subunits at a rate that is considerably slower than diffusion-controlled and similar to the rate of binding of gelsolin to monomeric actin.