The effect of anaesthetics on protein conformation in membranes as studied by the spin-labelling technique

The effect of general and local anaesthetics was studied on the membrane components (proteins and lipids) of frog sciatic nerve using the spin-labelling technique. A rapid and effective method was developed to incorporate fatty acid labels into the lipid regions and to attach the maleimide spin labels to the thiol sites of the proteins of the membrane. On the basis of the rotational correlation time of the attached maleimide spin labels, at least three different protein domains were identified. One part of the labels has a preferred orientation with respect to the axis of the nerve fibre. The effect of halothane and of local anaesthetics such as lidocaine and tetracaine, which influence primarily the lipid regions of the membrane, is efficiently transferred to the spin-labelled membrane proteins via strong lipid-protein interaction. The results support the concept that the architecture and the physiological activity of the membrane-bound proteins are sensitive to changes in the physical state of membrane lipids.     

Interaction of biological membranes with the cytoskeletal framework of living cells

The review is focused on the molecular structure and function of the proteins composing the actin-based cytokeletal cortex, located at the cytoplasmic face of plasma membranes of eucaryotic cells, which stabilizes integral membrane proteins in separate domains of cell membranes. It includes a survey of the molecular properties of teh proteins of the erythrocyte membrane skeleton such as spectrin, ankyrin, protein 4.1, and adducin. The properties of the immunological counterparts of erythroid cortical proteins found in nonerythroid tissues and cells are compared. The structural organization and function of the newly discovered class of calcium-binding proteins, nonerythroid peripheral membrane proteins, calpactins, are also described. Finally, the discussion of some experimental models illustrates that the membrane skeleton of living cells is actively involved in a wide variety of essential biological functions ranging from differentiation, to maintenance of cell polarity and cell shape, and regulation of exocytotic processes.     

Cytoskeleton functions in membrane traffic in polarized epithelial cells.

The complexity of membrane traffic in polarized epithelial cells between the Golgi complex and either the apical or basal-lateral membrane domain, and between different membrane domains (transcytosis) requires that vesicles leaving one membrane compartment efficiently and rapidly reach their (correct) destination. There is increasing evidence that microtubules, actin microfilaments and the membrane-cytoskeleton are involved in several aspects of vesicle transport and in the regulation of protein distributions in polarized epithelial cells. These possible functions are discussed in the context of the development and maintenance of cell polarity.     

Apical-basal polarity in Drosophila neuroblasts is independent of vesicular trafficking

The possession of apical-basal polarity is a common feature of epithelia and neural stem cells, so-called neuroblasts (NBs). In Drosophila, an evolutionarily conserved protein complex consisting of atypical protein kinase C and the scaffolding proteins Bazooka/PAR-3 and PAR-6 controls the polarity of both cell types. The components of this complex localize to the apical junctional region of epithelial cells and form an apical crescent in NBs. In epithelia, the PAR proteins interact with the cellular machinery for polarized exocytosis and endocytosis, both of which are essential for the establishment of plasma membrane polarity. In NBs, many cortical proteins show a strongly polarized subcellular localization, but there is little evidence for the existence of distinct apical and basolateral plasma membrane domains, raising the question of whether vesicular trafficking is required for polarization of NBs. We analyzed the polarity of NBs mutant for essential regulators of the main exocytic and endocytic pathways. Surprisingly, we found that none of these mutations affected NB polarity, demonstrating that NB cortical polarity is independent of plasma membrane polarity and that the PAR proteins function in a cell type-specific manner.     

NHERF1/EBP50 head-to-tail intramolecular interaction masks association with PDZ domain ligands

Loss of cell polarity is one of the initial alterations in the development of human epithelial cancers. Na(+)/H(+) exchanger regulatory factor (NHERF) homologous adaptors 1 and 2 are membrane-associated proteins composed of two amino (N)-terminal PDZ domains and an ezrin-radixin-moesin (ERM)-binding (EB) carboxyl (C)-terminal region. We describe here an intramolecular conformation of NHERF1/EBP50 (ERM-binding phosphoprotein 50) in which the C-terminal EB region binds to the PDZ2 domain. This novel head-to-tail conformation masked the interaction of both PDZ domains with PDZ domain-specific ligands, such as PTEN and beta-catenin. An EB region composite structure comprising an alpha-helix ending in a PDZ-binding motif imparted opposite effects to NHERF1 associations, mediating binding to ERM proteins and inhibiting binding of PDZ domain ligands. The PDZ domain inhibition was released by prior association of ezrin with the EB region, a condition that occurs in vivo and likely disrupts NHERF1 head-to-tail interaction. In contrast, NHERF2 did not present a regulatory mechanism for protein complex formation. Functionally, NHERF1 is required to organize complexes at the apical membranes of polarized epithelial cells. The regulation of NHERF1 interactions at the apical membrane thus appears to be a dynamic process that is important for maintaining epithelial-tissue integrity.     

Discs Lost, a novel multi-PDZ domain protein, establishes and maintains epithelial polarity

Polarization of epithelial cells depends on a hierarchical process whereby specific membrane-associated proteins become targeted to specialized membrane domains. Here, we describe a novel Drosophila protein, Discs Lost (DLT), that plays a crucial role in the polarization of embryonic epithelia during cellular blastoderm formation. At subsequent stages of development, DLT interacts with the apical determinant Crumbs (CRB) and the laterally localized protein Neurexin IV (NRX IV). Mutations in dlt or double-stranded RNA interference lead to aberrant localization of CRB and NRX IV and cause a concomitant loss of epithelial cell polarity. Hence, DLT is required to establish and maintain cell polarity and participates in different molecular complexes that define apical and lateral membrane domains.     

Interactions between the PDZ domains of Bazooka (Par-3) and phosphatidic acid: in vitro characterization and role in epithelial development

Bazooka (Par-3) is a conserved polarity regulator that organizes molecular networks in a wide range of cell types. In epithelia, it functions as a plasma membrane landmark to organize the apical domain. Bazooka is a scaffold protein that interacts with proteins through its three PDZ (postsynaptic density 95, discs large, zonula occludens-1) domains and other regions. In addition, Bazooka has been shown to interact with phosphoinositides. Here we show that the Bazooka PDZ domains interact with the negatively charged phospholipid phosphatidic acid immobilized on solid substrates or in liposomes. The interaction requires multiple PDZ domains, and conserved patches of positively charged amino acid residues appear to mediate the interaction. Increasing or decreasing levels of diacylglycerol kinase or phospholipase D-enzymes that produce phosphatidic acid-reveal a role for phosphatidic acid in Bazooka embryonic epithelial activity but not its localization. Mutating residues implicated in phosphatidic acid binding revealed a possible role in Bazooka localization and function. These data implicate a closer connection between Bazooka and membrane lipids than previously recognized. Bazooka polarity landmarks may be conglomerates of proteins and plasma membrane lipids that modify each other's activities for an integrated effect on cell polarity.     

Catch the KIF5B train to the apical surface

As epithelial cells become polarized, they develop new pathways to send proteins to the apical or basolateral domains of their plasma membrane. In this issue of Developmental Cell, Jaulin et al. (2007) show that as polarity develops, there is a shift in the kinesin motor protein used to transport an apical protein to the cell surface.     

K-35, a fluorescent probe for albumin study: optical properties

Fluorescent probe N-(carboxyphenyl)imide of 4-(dimethylamino)naphthalic acid, K-35, is used as an indicator of structural changes of human serum albumin molecules in pathology. The probe occupies albumin binding pockets where the probe environment is of very high polarity; probably, the pocket(s) contains protein polar groups and water molecules. At the same time rather small Stokes shift of K-35 fluorescence spectrum shows that the polar group motion is of one-two order of value lower than mobility of polar molecules in polar fluids. K-35 fluorescence decay in HSA can be described as a sum of three exponentials with time constants close to tau1=9 ns; tau2=3.6 ns and tau3=1.0 ns. A difference between excitation maxima of these three decay components shows that environment of these three species of K-35 molecules has been different before excitation. Different r values are probably a consequence of non-identical structure of several binding sites, or a binding site(s) can have a variable conformation.     

Protein-protein interactions in the membrane: sequence, structural, and biological motifs

Single-span transmembrane (TM) helices have structural and functional roles well beyond serving as mere anchors to tether water-soluble domains in the vicinity of the membrane. They frequently direct the assembly of protein complexes and mediate signal transduction in ways analogous to small modular domains in water-soluble proteins. This review highlights different sequence and structural motifs that direct TM assembly and discusses their roles in diverse biological processes. We believe that TM interactions are potential therapeutic targets, as evidenced by natural proteins that modulate other TM interactions and recent developments in the design of TM-targeting peptides.     

Interaction of activator of G-protein signaling 3 (AGS3) with LKB1, a serine/threonine kinase involved in cell polarity and cell cycle progression: phosphorylation of the G-protein regulatory (GPR) motif as a regulatory mechanism for the interaction of GPR motifs with Gi alpha

Activator of G-protein signaling 3 (AGS3) has a modular domain structure consisting of seven tetratricopeptide repeats (TPRs) and four G-protein regulatory (GPR) motifs. Each GPR motif binds to the alpha subunit of Gi/Go (Gialpha > Goalpha) stabilizing the GDP-bound conformation of Galpha and apparently competing with Gbetagamma for GalphaGDP binding. As an initial approach to identify regulatory mechanisms for AGS3-G-protein interactions, a yeast two-hybrid screen was initiated using the TPR and linker region of AGS3 as bait. This screen identified the serine/threonine kinase LKB1, which is involved in the regulation of cell cycle progression and polarity. Protein interaction assays in mammalian systems using transfected cells or brain lysate indicated the regulated formation of a protein complex consisting of LKB1, AGS3, and G-proteins. The interaction between AGS3 and LKB1 was also observed with orthologous proteins in Drosophila where both proteins are involved in cell polarity. LKB1 immunoprecipitates from COS7 cells transfected with LKB1 phosphorylated the GPR domains of AGS3 and the related protein LGN but not the AGS3-TPR domain. GPR domain phosphorylation was completely blocked by a consensus GPR motif peptide, and placement of a phosphate moiety within a consensus GPR motif reduced the ability of the peptide to interact with G-proteins. These data suggest that phosphorylation of GPR domains may be a general mechanism regulating the interaction of GPR-containing proteins with G-proteins. Such a mechanism may be of particular note in regard to localized signal processing in the plasma membrane involving G-protein subunits and/or intracellular functions regulated by heterotrimeric G-proteins that occur independently of a typical G-protein-coupled receptor.     

Cell polarity: Regulators and mechanisms in plants

Cell polarity plays an important role in a wide range of biological processes in plant growth and development.Cell polarity is manifested as the asymmetric distribution of molecules,for example,proteins and lipids,at the plasma membrane and inside of a cell.Here,we summarize a few polarized proteins that have been characterized in plants and we review recent advances towards understanding the molecular mechanism for them to polarize at the plasma membrane.Multiple mechanisms,including membrane trafficking,cytoskeletal activities,and protein phosphorylation,and so forth define the polarized plasma membrane domains.Recent discoveries suggest that the polar positioning of the proteo-lipid membrane domain may instruct the formation of polarity complexes in plants.In this review,we highlight the factors and regulators for their functions in establishing the membrane asymmetries in plant development.Furthermore,we discuss a few outstanding questions to be addressed to better understand the mechanisms by which cell polarity is regulated in plants.     

The transmembrane domain sequence affects the structure and function of the Newcastle disease virus fusion protein

The role of specific sequences in the transmembrane (TM) domain of Newcastle disease virus (NDV) fusion (F) protein in the structure and function of this protein was assessed by replacing this domain with the F protein TM domains from two other paramyxoviruses, Sendai virus (SV) and measles virus (MV), or the TM domain of the unrelated glycoprotein (G) of vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV). Mutant proteins with the SV or MV F protein TM domains were expressed, transported to cell surfaces, and proteolytically cleaved at levels comparable to that of the wild-type protein, while mutant proteins with the VSV G protein TM domain were less efficiently expressed on cell surfaces and proteolytically cleaved. All mutant proteins were defective in all steps of membrane fusion, including hemifusion. In contrast to the wild-type protein, the mutant proteins did not form detectable complexes with the NDV hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN) protein. As determined by binding of conformation-sensitive antibodies, the conformations of the ectodomains of the mutant proteins were altered. These results show that the specific sequence of the TM domain of the NDV F protein is important for the conformation of the preactivation form of the ectodomain, the interactions of the protein with HN protein, and fusion activity.     

Membrane Organization and Dynamics in Cell Polarity

The establishment and maintenance of cell polarity is important to a wide range of biological processes ranging from chemotaxis to embryogenesis. An essential feature of cell polarity is the asymmetric organization of proteins and lipids in the plasma membrane. In this article, we discuss how polarity regulators such as small GTP-binding proteins and phospholipids spatially and kinetically control vesicular trafficking and membrane organization. Conversely, we discuss how membrane trafficking contributes to cell polarization through delivery of polarity determinants and regulators to the plasma membrane.Cell polarity is essential in most if not all eukaryotes for their development and physiological functions at the tissue and organism level. Although there are significant differences in gross morphology and function among various tissues and organisms, at the cellular level, the establishment and maintenance of cell polarity tend to follow common themes.A basic feature of cell polarity is the asymmetric organization of the plasma membrane (see McCaffrey and Macara 2009; Nelson 2009). This is mostly achieved through membrane trafficking along cytoskeleton tracks under the control of signaling molecules. In general, membrane trafficking occurs through sequential budding, transport, and fusion of vesicles from donor membranes to acceptor membranes (for recent reviews, see Bonifacino and Glick 2004; Cai et al. 2007). During budding, protein complexes interact with phospholipids to induce membrane curvature and generate vesicular carriers that capture different cargos from the donor compartments. After vesicles form, they are delivered to their acceptor compartments, most often along the cytoskeletons. Vesicle fusion at the acceptor membrane is mediated by the assembly of SNARE (soluble N-ethylmaleimide-sensitive fusion protein attachment protein receptors) complexes. Before membrane fusion, proteins or protein complexes tether the vesicles to the acceptor membranes and likely promote SNARE assembly. The Arf and Rab family of small GTPases are localized to different membrane compartments and regulate various stages of membrane trafficking.Polarized distribution of proteins at the plasma membrane often results from a balance of vesicle delivery and fusion with the plasma membrane (“exocytosis”), two-dimensional spread through the plasma membrane (“diffusion”), and internalization and membrane recycling (“endocytosis”). There are two main layers of regulation that control polarized protein transport and incorporation to the plasma membrane. The first involves sorting at the trans-Golgi network (TGN) and endosomal compartments, such as the recycling endosomes. Protein sorting involves recognition of sorting signals in the cargo proteins by the adaptor protein (AP) complexes. There are a number of different AP complexes, and each is localized to different membrane compartments and captures distinct sets of cargo proteins before targeting to their correct destination. Protein sorting before delivery to different domains of the plasma membrane has been best characterized in epithelial cells, which have distinctive basolateral and apical domains separated by junctional complexes. This layer of regulation has been discussed in a recent review (Mellman and Nelson 2008) and is further discussed by Nelson (Nelson 2009), so it will not be discussed further here. The second layer of regulation of membrane protein polarization is through the polarized tethering and docking of vesicles at specific domains of the plasma membrane (Fig. 1). Tethering proteins (i.e., the exocyst) target secretory vesicles to specific domains of the plasma membrane and SNARE assembly eventually drives membrane fusion. Proteins at the plasma membrane can be retrieved back into the cell via endocytosis. These proteins are internalized via clathrin-coated pits, and transported through different endosomal compartments either for degradation in the lysosomes or for recycling back to the plasma membrane. The endosomal compartment that mediates the transport of internalized plasma membrane proteins back to the cell surface is called the “recycling endosome.” Recycling endosomes are major sources of cargo destined to the plasma membrane for exocytosis in many types of cells.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.Membrane trafficking to the plasma membrane. Schematic of the endocytic and exocytic routes involving trans-Golgi network (TGN), endosomal compartments, and the plasma membrane. During exocytosis, cargo leaves the TGN or recycling endosomes in vesicular carriers to the plasma membrane. Once on the membrane, proteins can be internalized and transported to early endosomes, and then either travel through late endosomes to the lysosome to be degraded or return to the plasma membrane through the recycling endosomes. Early endosomes may serve as sorting stations for the next stages of cargo transport.Signaling molecules such as the Rho family of small GTPases spatially and kinetically regulate membrane trafficking during cell polarization (see McCaffrey and Macara 2009; Slaughter et al. 2009). Reversely, vesicular trafficking is required for the polarized deposition and accrual of these regulators. In the first part of this article, we examine the membrane organization and dynamics of cell polarity, focusing on the polarized tethering and docking of vesicles at the plasma membrane. We highlight key components and regulators of polarized exocytosis including the exocyst, small GTPases, and phospholipids. We also use different organisms and systems to show analogous mechanisms during cell polarization. In the second part of this article, we focus on the aforementioned reciprocal effects of cell polarity and membrane trafficking using two representative examples, one from yeast (Cdc42 polarization) and one in mammalian epithelial cells (E-cadherin trafficking).     

Formation of self-organizing functionally distinct Rho of plants domains involves a reduced mobile population

Rho family proteins are central to the regulation of cell polarity in eukaryotes. Rho of Plants-Guanyl nucleotide Exchange Factor (ROPGEF) can form self-organizing polar domains following co-expression with an Rho of Plants (ROP) and an ROP GTPase-Activating Protein (ROPGAP). Localization of ROPs in these domains has not been demonstrated, and the mechanisms underlying domain formation and function are not well understood. Here we show that six different ROPs form self-organizing domains when co-expressed with ROPGEF3 and GAP1 in Nicotiana benthamiana or Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Domain formation was associated with ROP–ROPGEF3 association, reduced ROP mobility, as revealed by time-lapse imaging and Fluorescence Recovery After Photobleaching beam size analysis, and was independent of Rho GTP Dissociation Inhibitor mediated recycling. The domain formation depended on the ROPs’ activation/inactivation cycles and interaction with anionic lipids via a C-terminal polybasic domain. Coexpression with the microtubule-associated protein ROP effector INTERACTOR OF CONSTITUTIVELY ACTIVE ROP 1 (ICR1) revealed differential function of the ROP domains in the ability to recruit ICR1. Taken together, the results reveal mechanisms underlying self-organizing ROP domain formation and function.

Plasma membrane self-organizing polarity domains of small GTP-binding proteins form upon their co-expression together with their activator and suppressor due to restriction of protein mobility.     

Mapping the Polarity Interactome

Interactions between proteins are an essential part of biology, and the desire to identify these interactions has led to the development of numerous technologies to systematically map protein–protein interactions at a large scale. As in most cellular processes, protein interactions are central to the control of cell polarity, and a full understanding of polarity will require comprehensive knowledge of the protein interactions involved. At its core, cell polarity is established through carefully regulated mutually inhibitory interactions between several groups of cortical proteins. While several interactions have been identified, the dynamics and molecular mechanisms that control these interactions are not well understood. Cell polarity also needs to be integrated with cellular processes including junction formation, cytoskeletal organization, organelle positioning, protein trafficking, and functional specialization of membrane domains. Moreover, polarized cells need to respond to external cues that coordinate polarity at the tissue level. Identifying the protein–protein interactions responsible for integrating polarity with all of these processes remains a major challenge, in part because the mechanisms of polarity control vary in different contexts and with developmental times. Because of their unbiased nature, systematic large-scale protein–protein interaction mapping approaches can be particularly helpful to identify such mechanisms. Here, we discuss methods commonly used to generate proteome-wide interactome maps, with an emphasis on advances in our understanding of cell polarity that have been achieved through application of such methods.     

Basolateral targeting by leucine-rich repeat domains in epithelial cells

The asymmetric distribution of proteins to basolateral and apical membranes is an important feature of epithelial cell polarity. To investigate how basolateral LAP proteins (LRR (for leucine-rich repeats) and PDZ (for PSD-95/Discs-large/ZO-1), which play key roles in cell polarity, reach their target membrane, we carried out a structure–function study of three LAP proteins: Caenorhabditis elegans LET-413, human Erbin and human Scribble (hScrib). Deletion and point mutation analyses establish that their LRR domain is crucial for basolateral membrane targeting. This property is specific to the LRR domain of LAP proteins, as the non-LAP protein SUR-8 does not localize at the basolateral membrane of epithelial cells, despite having a closely related LRR domain. Importantly, functional studies of LET-413 in C. elegans show that although its PDZ domain is dispensable during embryogenesis, its LRR domain is essential. Our data establish a novel paradigm for protein localization by showing that a subset of LRR domains direct subcellular localization in polarized cells.     

Spin-labeling study of membranes in wheat embryo axes. 1. Partitioning of doxyl stearates into the lipid domains

The interaction of lipid soluble spin labels with wheat embryo axes has been investigated to obtain insight into the structural organization of lipid domains in embryo cell membranes, using conventional electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) and saturation transfer EPR (ST-EPR) spectroscopy. Stearic acid spin labels (n-SASL) and their methylated derivatives (n-MeSASL), labelled at different positions of their doxyl group (n=5, 12 and 16), were used to probe the ordering and molecular mobility in different regions of the lipid moiety of axis cell membranes. The ordering and local polarity in relation to the position of the doxyl group along the hydrocarbon chain of SASL, determined over the temperature range from -50 to +20 degrees C, are typical for biological and model lipid membranes, but essentially differ from those in seed oil droplets. Positional profiles for ST-EPR spectra show that the flexibility profile along the lipid hydrocarbon chain does exist even at low temperatures, when most of the membrane lipids are in solid state (gel phase). The ordering of the SASL nitroxide radical in the membrane surface region is essentially higher than that in the depth of the membrane. The doxyl groups of MeSASLs are less ordered (even at low temperatures) than those of the corresponding SASLs, indicating that the MeSASLs are located in the bulk of membrane lipids rather than in the protein boundary lipids. The analysis of the profiles of EPR and ST-EPR spectral parameters allows us to conclude that the vast majority of SASL and MeSASL molecules accumulated in embryo axes is located in the cell membranes rather than in the interior of the oil bodies. The preferential partitioning of the doxyl stearates into membranes demonstrates the potential of the EPR spin-labelling technique for the in situ study of membrane behavior in seeds of different hydration levels.     

Lethal giant larvae take on a life of their own

Cell polarization requires the segregation of the plasma membrane into domains of distinct protein composition. The Lethal giant larvae (Lgl) protein of Drosophila, initially identified as a tumor suppressor, establishes such domains by localizing specific proteins to specific regions of the plasma membrane. However, how it does this remains puzzling and controversial. Recent studies of the yeast orthologs show a molecular pathway through which Lgl is activated locally to promote the targeted fusion of vesicles with the plasma membrane. Here, we reconcile these data with conflicting findings on the mechanism of Lgl in animals and consider if a similar model explains its role in epithelial polarity and asymmetric cell division.