Efficacy of decreasing the dose of GnRH used in a protocol for synchronization of ovulation and timed AI in lactating dairy cows

To determine the efficacy of reducing the dosage of GnRH used in a protocol for synchronization of ovulation and timed AI, primiparous and multiparous lactating Holstein cows (n=237) were randomly assigned to 1 of 2 treatment groups. Ovulation was synchronized for cows in the first group using intramuscular injections of GnRH and PGF₂ as follows: Day 0, 100 μg GnRH; Day 7, 25 mg PGF₂; Day 9, 100 μg GnRH. Ovulation was synchronized in the second group of cows using the same injection schedule and dosage of PGF₂ but only 50 μg GnRH per injection. All cows underwent a timed AI at 12 to 18 h after the second GnRH injection. The proportion of cows ovulating in response to the second GnRH injection (synchronization rate) and pregnancy status at 28 and 56 d post AI were determined using transrectal ultrasonography. The synchronization rate, double-ovulation rate, conception rate at 28 and 56 d post AI, and pregnancy loss from 28 to 56 d post AI did not differ statistically between treatment groups. For all cows, synchronization rate was 84.0%, and double-ovulation rate was 14.1%. Conception rates calculated using all cows receiving synchronization of ovulation were 41.1% at 28 d and 34.4% at 56 d post AI. Conception rates calculated for only synchronized cows were 47.6% at 28 d and 40.1% at 56 d post AI. For all cows, pregnancy loss from 28 to 56 d post AI was 13.5%, with an attrition rate of 0.5% per day. Estimated savings in hormone costs using 50 rather than 100 μg GnRH per injection for synchronizing ovulation were $6.40 per cow and $20.27 per pregnancy. Thus, decreasing the dosage of GnRH used for synchronization of ovulation and timed AI in lactating dairy cows reduces synchronization costs per cow and per pregnancy without compromising the efficacy of the synchronization protocol.     

Pattern and manipulation of follicular development in Bos indicus cattle

Bos indicus cattle are widespread in tropical regions due to their adaptation to these environments. Although data on reproductive performance have indicated both inferior and superior results for B. indicus cattle, there is little doubt that B. indicus cattle are superior than Bos taurus cattle when they are both kept in tropical or subtropical environments, where stressors like hot temperatures, humidity, ectoparasites and low quality forages are greater. Reproductive endocrinology and oestrus behaviour of the B. indicus cattle have been studied for over 30 years; however, the application of technologies such as real time ultrasonography and Heat-Watch systems has expanded our knowledge on the ovarian follicular-wave dynamics during the oestrous cycle and the time of ovulation. Ovarian follicular dynamics in B. indicus cattle is characterised by the occurrence of two, three or sometimes four waves of follicular development. While dominance is similar to that in B. taurus cattle, maximum diameters of the dominant follicle and CL are smaller than those reported in B. taurus and are probably due to a lower capacity for LH secretion than in B. taurus. Duration of oestrus is approximately 10 h and the interval from oestrus to ovulation is about 27 h. However, the variability in response to prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) treatments and the difficulty for oestrus detection in B. indicus cattle have limited the widespread application of artificial insemination (AI) and emphasizes the need for treatments that control follicular development and ovulation. Follicular-wave development in B. indicus cattle can be controlled mechanically by ultrasound-guided follicle ablation, or hormonally by treatments with GnRH or oestradiol and progestogen/progesterone in combination. Treatments with GnRH plus PGF and a second GnRH (synchronization protocol known as Ovsynch) or oestradiol benzoate (known as GPE) have resulted in acceptable pregnancy rates after fixed-time AI (FTAI) in cycling cows, but results were lower in heifers and cows in postpartum anoestrus. Alternatively, treatments with oestradiol and progestogen/progesterone releasing devices resulted in synchronous emergence of a new follicular wave, and a second oestradiol or GnRH treatment after device removal resulted in synchronous ovulation and acceptable pregnancy rates to FTAI. Furthermore, oestradiol and progesterone treatments combined with eCG (given at the time of device removal) increased pregnancy rates in suckled B. indicus cows and may be useful for the treatment of cows in postpartum anoestrus. In summary, exogenous control of luteal and follicular development facilitates the application of assisted reproductive technologies in B. indicus cattle by offering the possibility of planning AI programs without the necessity of oestrus detection and without sacrificing the overall results.     

Risk factors for resumption of postpartum estrous cycles and embryonic survival in lactating dairy cows

The objectives of this study were to evaluate factors associated with resumption of postpartum estrous cycles and embryonic survival in lactating dairy cows. Holstein cows, 6396 from four dairy farms were evaluated to determine the relationships among parity, body condition score (BCS) at calving and at AI, season of year when cows calved, and milk yield on resumption of postpartum estrous cycles by 65 days postpartum, and all the previous variables, estrual or anestrus and AI protocol on conception rates and embryonic survival at the first postpartum insemination. Cows had their estrous cycle pre-synchronized with two PGF_2α injections given 14 days apart and were inseminated between 69 and 82 days postpartum following either an estrous or ovulation synchronization protocol initiated 12–14 days after the presynchronization. Blood was sampled and analyzed for progesterone twice, 12–14 days apart, to determine whether cows had initiated onset of estrous cycles after calving. Cows were scored for body condition in the week after calving, and again at AI, between 69 and 82 days postpartum. Pregnancy was diagnosed at 30 ± 3 and 58 ± 3 days after AI. Farm influenced all reproductive outcomes evaluated. More (P < 0.0001) multiparous than primiparous cows had initiated estrous cycles. Onset of estrous cycles was also influenced (P < 0.01) by BCS at calving and at AI, BCS change, season, and milk yield. More (P < 0.001) cows that had initiated estrous cycles than anestrous cows were pregnant at 30 and 58 days after AI, but anestrus did not affect pregnancy loss. Conception rates were also influenced (P < 0.01) by parity, BCS at calving and AI, BCS change, and season; however, milk yield and insemination protocol were not associated with conception rates at 30 and 58 days after AI. Factors that reduced conception rate on day 30 after AI also increased pregnancy loss between 30 and 58 days of gestation. Improving BCS at calving and AI, minimizing losses of BCS after calving, and hastening onset of estrous cycles early postpartum are all expected to increase conception because of enhanced embryonic survival.     

Synchronization of ovulation in dairy cows using PGF2alpha and GnRH

This paper reports a new method for synchronizing the time of ovulation in cattle using GnRH and PGF(2alpha). In Experiments 1 and 2, lactating dairy cows (n=20) ranging from 36 to 280 d postpartum and dairy heifers (n=24) 14 to 16 mo old were treated with an intramuscular injection of 100 mug GnRH at a random stage of the estrous cycle. Seven d later the cattle received PGF(2alpha) to regress corpora lutea (CL). Lactating cows and heifers received a second injection of 100 mug GnRH 48 and 24 h later, respectively. Lactating cows were artificially inseminated 24 h after the second GnRH injection. Ovarian morphology was monitored daily by trans-rectal ultrasonography from 5 d prior to treatment until ovulation. In Experiment 3, the flexibility in the timing of hormonal injections with this synchronization protocol was evaluated by randomly assigning 66 lactating dairy cows to 3 different treatment groups. Lactating cows received the injection of PGF(2alpha) 48 (Group 1), 24 (Group 2), and 0 h (Group 3) prior to the second injection of GnRH, which was administered at the same time in each group to ensure the second injection of GnRH was given when follicles were at a similar stage of growth. In Experiments 1 and 2, the first injection of GnRH caused ovulation and formation of a new or accessory CL in 18 20 cows and 13 24 heifers. In addition, this injection of GnRH initiated or was coincident with initiation of a new follicular wave in 20 20 lactating cows and 18 24 heifers. Corpora lutea regressed after PGF(2alpha) in 20 20 cows and in 18 24 heifers. All cows and 18 24 heifers ovulated a newly formed dominant follicle between 24 and 32 h after the second injection of GnRH. Ten of 20 cows conceived to the timed artificial insemination. In Experiment 3, the conception rate in Groups 1 and 2 were greater than in Group 3, (55 and 46 % vs 11%, respectively). In summary, this protocol could have a major impact on managing reproduction in lactating dairy cows, because it allows for AI to occur at a known time of ovulation and eliminates the need for detection of estrus.     

Managing the dominant follicle in lactating dairy cows

Reproductive efficiency is not optimal in high-producing dairy cows. Although many aspects of ovarian follicular growth in cows are similar to those observed in heifers, there are numerous specific differences in follicular development that may be linked with changes in reproductive physiology in high-producing lactating dairy cows. These include: 1) reduced circulating estradiol (E2) concentrations near estrus, 2) ovulation of follicles that are larger than the optimal size, 3) increased double ovulation and twinning, and 4) increased incidence of anovulation with a distinctive pattern of follicle growth in anovular dairy cows. The first three changes become more dramatic as milk production increases, although anovulation has not generally been associated with level of milk production. To overcome reproductive inefficiencies in dairy cows, reproductive management programs have been developed to synchronize ovulation and enable the use of timed AI in lactating dairy cows. Effective regulation of the CL, follicles, and hormonal environment during each part of the protocol is critical for optimizing these programs. This review discusses the distinct aspects of follicular development in lactating dairy cows and the methodologies that have been utilized in the past two decades in order to manage the dominant follicle during synchronization of ovulation and timed AI programs.     

Managing the dominant follicle in lactating dairy cows

Reproductive efficiency is not optimal in high-producing dairy cows. Although many aspects of ovarian follicular growth in cows are similar to those observed in heifers, there are numerous specific differences in follicular development that may be linked with changes in reproductive physiology in high-producing lactating dairy cows. These include: 1) reduced circulating estradiol (E2) concentrations near estrus, 2) ovulation of follicles that are larger than the optimal size, 3) increased double ovulation and twinning, and 4) increased incidence of anovulation with a distinctive pattern of follicle growth in anovular dairy cows. The first three changes become more dramatic as milk production increases, although anovulation has not generally been associated with level of milk production. To overcome reproductive inefficiencies in dairy cows, reproductive management programs have been developed to synchronize ovulation and enable the use of timed AI in lactating dairy cows. Effective regulation of the CL, follicles, and hormonal environment during each part of the protocol is critical for optimizing these programs. This review discusses the distinct aspects of follicular development in lactating dairy cows and the methodologies that have been utilized in the past two decades in order to manage the dominant follicle during synchronization of ovulation and timed AI programs.     

Effects of abnormal ovarian cycles during pre-service period postpartum on subsequent reproductive performance of high-producing Holstein cows

The primary objective of this study was to investigate the effects of abnormal ovarian cycles during the pre-service postpartum period on subsequent reproductive performance of high-producing Holstein cows. The study was conducted in a commercial dairy farm with approximately 150 lactating cows, in a subtropical region of Japan. Animals were kept in free-stall barn, and fed a total mixed ration. Cows that calved from June 2001 to July 2002 were included in the study. Milk samples were collected twice weekly from 2 to 11 weeks postpartum, and progesterone concentrations in skim milk were determined by ELISA. After a voluntary waiting period of 40 days, cows detected in estrus were bred by artificial insemination (AI). Pregnancy was confirmed by palpation per rectum 40-70 days after AI. Out of a total of 91 cases, 39 (42.9%) had normal ovarian cycles (ovulation within 45 days after calving, followed by normal ovarian cycles), 32 (35.2%) had prolonged luteal phase (i.e. luteal activity for >20 days), and 12 (13.2%) had anovulation or delayed first ovulation (i.e. first ovulation did not occur until >45 days after calving). The remaining (8.8%) had other types of abnormalities. When compared with cows with a normal ovarian cycle, prolonged luteal phase cows had a lower 100 days AI submission rate, conception rate and pregnancy rate (84.2% versus 56.3%; P<0.05, 50% versus 16.7%; P<0.05 and 42.1% versus 9.4%; P<0.01, respectively), and longer intervals to first AI and to conception ( 67+/-6 days versus 98+/-7 days and 95+/-9 days versus 136+/-11 days; P<0.01 for each). Similarly, when compared with cows with normal ovarian cycles, those with anovulation had lower 100 days conception rate and pregnancy rate (50% versus 0%; P<0.05 and 42.1% versus 0%; P<0.01, respectively), and longer intervals to first AI and to conception ( 67+/-6 days versus 93+/-12 days; P<0.05 and 95+/-9 days versus 155+/-14 days; P<0.01, respectively). Survival analysis of the data for calving to conception interval showed that cows with prolonged luteal phase or anovulation were getting pregnant at a slower rate, and took longer to get pregnant than the cows with normal resumption of ovarian cyclicity postpartum. In conclusion, abnormal ovarian cycles during the pre-service period postpartum adversely affected reproductive performance, including AI submission rate, pregnancy rate, interval to first AI, and calving to conception interval in high-producing Holstein cows.     

Influence of stage of lactation and milk production on conception rates after timed artificial insemination following Ovsynch

Conception rates after timed artificial insemination (TAI) are of paramount importance for the success of protocols based on synchronization of ovulation. Stage of lactation and milk production level are known factors that influence dairy cow fertility. It was the objective of this study to analyse the effect of stage of lactation and milk production level on conception rates and pregnancy rates by 200 days in milk (DIM) in dairy cows synchronized with the Ovsynch protocol (Day -10, Day -1: 0.1 mg of D-Phe6-gonadorelin, Day -3: 0.5 mg of cloprostenol, Day 0: AI). A total of 1,288 dairy cows were assigned to two groups and classified in three production levels (high, average, low). Cows of all milk production levels in Group 1 (Simultaneous Ovsynch, SO) were synchronized with the Ovsynch protocol simultaneously for TAI between 73 and 81 DIM. In Group 2 cows with average milk production were synchronized at the same time as Group 1, while low producing cows were synchronized 3 weeks earlier and high producing cows were synchronized 3 weeks later than Group 1, respectively. First service conception rates (FSCRs) were lower (P<0.05) in cows synchronized earlier than in cows of the same production level synchronized later (low production: 14.4% (22/153) versus 34.5% (51/148); high production: 28.2% (40/142) versus 41.4% (53/128)). Milk production level had no significant impact on conception rates after TAI in cows synchronized at the same stage of lactation. At 200 DIM fewer cows with high production level were pregnant than cows with average or low production (P<0.05). This effect was independent of the stage of lactation at the initiation of Ovsynch. Endometritis at a postpartum examination did not influence conception rates after TAI. In conclusion, stage of lactation, but not milk production level, has a major influence on conception rates after TAI. Early AI after Ovsynch is less efficient and therefore its return on investment should be evaluated carefully.     

Effects of an analog of PGF2(alpha) (ONO-1052) on cows with luteinized ovarian cysts following treatment with GnRH analog (fertirelin acetate)

Effects of PGF2(alpha) analog (ONO-1052) on cows with luteinized cysts following treatment with GnRH analog (fertirelin) in inducing estrus and shortening an interval from treatment to conception were investigated in a field trial. Seventy-five cows with follicular cysts diagnosed by rectal palpation were treated intramuscularly (i.m.) with 400 mug fertirelin (an analog of GnRH). Luteinization of follicular cysts were tentatively judged by rectal palpation. Forty-one cows were considered to have luteinized cysts and were either treated i.m. with ONO-1052 (28 cows) or left untreated as controls (13 cows). Thirty-four other cows were considered to have not responded to fertirelin and retreated with 10,000 MU hCG (19 cows) or fertirelin (five cows). This tentative judgment of luteinization of the cysts by rectal palpation after treatment was later confirmed by determining serum progesterone concentration before and 10 to 14 days after treatment. Only in the cows with luteinized cysts which were confirmed by serum progesterone analysis; increased from a pretreatment level below 1.0 ng/ml to a value of 1.0 ng/ml or higher 10 to 14 days after treatment, effects of ONO-1052 combined with fertirelin were investigated. Of the 18 cows with luteinized cysts thus confirmed following fertirelin injection and treated with ONO-1052, 15 (83.3 %) cows came into estrus within 26 +/- 14 (mean +/- SD) days after the first treatment; eight cows within three to five days and four cows within 22 to 28 days, and 14 cows (77.8 %) conceived within 100 days (42 +/- 26 days). On the other hand, the five control cows with luteinized cysts that were not treated with ONO-1052 required significantly longer to exhibit normal estrus (54 +/- 13 days; P<0.05) and to conceive (54 +/- 13 days). These results indicate that ONO-1052 combined with fertirelin may be useful to shorten the interval from treatment to normal estrus and to conception in cows with follicular cysts.     

Luteal activity at the onset of a timed insemination protocol affects reproductive outcome in early postpartum dairy cows

This study was designed to compare two timed insemination protocols, in which progesterone, GnRH and PGF2alpha were combined, with the Ovsynch protocol in presynchronized, early postpartum dairy cows. Reproductive performance was also evaluated according to whether cows showed high or low plasma progesterone concentration, at the onset of treatment. One hundred and six early postpartum dairy cows were presynchronized with two cloprostenol treatments given 14 days apart, and then assigned to one of the three treatment groups. Treatments for the synchronization of estrus in all three groups started 7 days after the second cloprostenol injection, which was considered Day 0 of the actual treatment regime. Cows in the control group (Ovsynch, n=30) were treated with GnRH on Day 0, PGF2alpha on Day 7, and were given a second dose of GnRH 32 h later. Cows in group PRID (n=45) were fitted with a progesterone releasing intravaginal device (PRID) for 9 days, and were given GnRH at the time of PRID insertion and PGF2alpha on Day 7. In group PRID/GnRH (n=31), cows received the same treatment as in the PRID group, but were given an additional GnRH injection 36 h after PRID removal. Cows were inseminated 16-20 h after the administration of the second GnRH dose in the Ovsynch group, and 56 h after PRID removal in the PRID and PRID/GnRH groups. Ovulation rate was determined on Day 11 postinsemination by detecting the presence of a corpus luteum in the ovaries. Lactation number, milk production, body condition at the onset of treatment and treatment regime were included as potential factors influencing ovulation and pregnancy after synchronization. Logistic regression analysis for cows with high and low progesterone concentration on treatment Day 0 revealed that none of the factors included in the models, except the interaction between progesterone and treatment regime, influenced the risk of ovulation and pregnancy significantly. In cows with high progesterone concentration at treatment onset, Ovsynch treatment resulted in a significantly improved pregnancy rate over values obtained following PRID or PRID/GnRH treatment. In cows with low progesterone concentration, PRID or PRID/GnRH treatment led to markedly increased ovulation and pregnancy rates with respect to Ovsynch treatment. These findings suggest the importance of establishing ovarian status in early postpartum dairy cows before starting a timed AI protocol, in terms of luteal activity assessed by blood progesterone.     

Comparison of the effect of estradiol benzoate plus progesterone and GnRH on the follicular wave emergence and subsequent follicular development in CIDR-treated, lactating dairy cows with follicular cysts

This study examined the effect of estradiol benzoate (EB) plus progesterone (P4) as compared with GnRH on follicular wave emergence and follicular development, and synchrony of ovulation and pregnancy rates following a second injection of GnRH in a controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based timed AI (TAI) protocol in lactating dairy cows with follicular cysts. Lactating dairy cows diagnosed with follicular cysts received a CIDR device, with an injection of 2mg EB plus 50mg P4 (EB+P4 group) or with an injection of 100 microg GnRH (GnRH group) at the beginning of the experiment (day 0). Thereafter, all received PGF(2alpha) at the time of CIDR removal on day 7, GnRH on day 9, and TAI 16 h later. Follicular wave emergence occurred within 7 days in 12/15 EB plus P4-treated and 14/15 GnRH-treated cows (P>0.05). The interval to wave emergence was longer in the EB+P4 group (4.8+/-0.4 days) than in the GnRH group (2.0+/-0.2 days). The mean diameters of preovulatory follicles and the proportion of cows with preovulatory follicles greater than 12 mm on day 9 did not differ between groups (P>0.05). The proportion of cows with synchronized ovulations by 40 h after the GnRH injection on day 11 and pregnancy rates to TAI did not differ between the EB+P4 (13/15 and 36.7%) and the GnRH (14/15 and 53.3%) groups, respectively. Results suggest that a single treatment with EB plus P4 as compared with GnRH simultaneously with CIDR insertion in lactating dairy cows with follicular cysts will result in relatively asynchronous emergence of a new follicular wave, but subsequently similar sizes of preovulatory follicles and synchronous ovulation, resulting in similar pregnancy rates to TAI.     

Manipulation and control of the estrous cycle in pasture-based dairy cows

Treatments designed to synchronize luteolysis, preovulatory follicular development, and ovulation, and resynchronize estrus after a first AI have improved responses to synchronization treatments. Protocols based only on the use of PGF result in variable onset of estrus. Concentrations of progesterone prior to administering PGF have affected submission rates and fertility while administration of estradiol benzoate (EB) after inducing luteolysis has improved the synchrony of estrus and ovulation in some studies. In pasture-based dairy cows, GnRH-based protocols have generally resulted in one-third of both anestrous and cycling cows conceiving following synchronization of ovulation and timed AI. Protocols which use intravaginal progesterone releasing inserts (IVP4) are effective in inducing estrus in over 90% of treated dairy cows. Resynchronization of estrus after reinsertion of an IVP4 also improves the synchrony of returns to estrus, but pregnancy rates to the first AI have been reduced in some studies, and submission rates at a resynchronized estrus are less than at the first synchronized estrus. Administration of EB can be used to synchronize follicle wave emergence in resynchronized cows with intervals to new wave emergence comparable to that in cows synchronized for a first AI, but plasma concentrations of progesterone following treatment may be reduced. Synchronization of estrus and ovulation can be enhanced by administration of EB or GnRH during proestrus, but dose, timing and stage of follicular development at the time of treatment can affect outcomes.     

A CIDR-based timed AI protocol can be effectively used for dairy cows with follicular cysts

The present study evaluated whether a controlled internal drug release (CIDR)-based timed AI (TAI) protocol could be used as an efficient tool for the treatment of ovarian follicular cysts in lactating dairy cows. In the first experiment, lactating dairy cows diagnosed with follicular cysts were randomly assigned to two treatments: (1) a single injection of GnRH at diagnosis (Day 0) and AI at estrus (AIE) within 21 days (GnRH group, n=70), or (2) insertion of a CIDR device containing progesterone and an injection of GnRH on Day 0, PGF(2alpha) injection at the time of CIDR removal on Day 7, GnRH injection on Day 9, and TAI 16h after the GnRH injection (CIDR-based TAI group, n=65). Conception rate after the CIDR-based TAI protocol (52.3%) was greater (P<0.05) than that after AIE following a single GnRH injection (26.9%). In the second experiment, lactating dairy cows diagnosed with follicular cysts (Cyst group, n=16) and cows having normal estrous cycles (CYC group, n=15) received the same treatment: a CIDR device containing progesterone and an injection of GnRH on Day 0, PGF(2alpha) injection at the time of CIDR removal on Day 7, and GnRH injection on Day 9. The proportion of cows with follicular wave emergence and the interval from treatment to follicular wave emergence did not differ (P>0.05) between groups. The mean diameters of dominant follicles on Days 4 and 7 as well as preovulatory follicles on Day 9, and the synchrony of ovulation following the second injection of GnRH did not differ (P>0.05) between groups. These data suggest that the CIDR-based TAI protocol results in an acceptable conception rate in dairy cows with follicular cysts.     

Effect of an implant containing the GnRH agonist deslorelin on secretion of LH, ovarian activity and milk yield of postpartum dairy cows

Prevention of high plasma progesterone concentrations in the early postpartum period may improve fertility. Our objective was to determine whether a Deslorelin implant (DESL; 2100 microg, s.c.) would reduce secretion of LH and alter follicle dynamics, plasma concentrations of progesterone, estradiol and PGF2alpha metabolite (PGFM) in postpartum dairy cows. Cows received DESL on Day 7 postpartum (Day 7, n=8) or were untreated (Control, n=9). All cows were injected with GnRH (100 microg, i.m.) on Day 14 to assess LH response. A protocol for synchronization of ovulation with timed AI was initiated on Day 60 (GnRH [Day 60], CIDR [Day 60 to Day 67], PGF2alpha [Day 67, 25 mg and Day 68, 15 mg], GnRH [Day 69] , AI [Day 70]). The LH response to injection of GnRH on Day 14 was blocked in animals treated with DESL. Numbers of Class 1 (<6 mm) follicles were unaffected (P > 0.05) whereas numbers of Class 2 (6 to 9 mm) (P < 0.01) and Class 3 (>9 mm) follicles were less (P < 0.01) in DESL cows between Day 7 and Day 21. From Day 22 to Day 60, DESL-treated cows had more of Class 1 follicles and less Class 2 (P < 0.01) and Class 3 (P < 0.01) follicles, and lower plasma concentrations of progesterone and estradiol (P < 0.01). Concentrations of PGFM between Day 7 and Day 42 were not affected by treatment (P > 0.05). All cows ovulated in response to GnRH on Day 69. Subsequent luteal phase increases in plasma progesterone concentrations (Day 70 to Day 84) did not differ. The use of the DESL implant associated with PGF2alpha given 14 days later suppressed ovarian activity and caused plasma progesterone concentrations to remain < 1 ng/mL between Day 22 and Day 51. The DESL implant did not affect milk production.     

Effect of days postpartum and exogenous GnRH on reproductive hormone and ovarian changes in postpartum suckled beef cows

Two experiments were conducted to determine the effect of days postpartum and exogenous gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) on reproductive hormone and ovarian changes in postpartum suckled beef cows. In experiment 1, eight suckled cows were bled at .5 hour intervals for 4 hours on days 7, 14, 21 and 28 postpartum. Although mean concentrations of plasma luteinizing hormone (LH) were positively correlated with days postpartum, mean concentrations did not differ. The mean maximum change and the variance of plasma LH were low on days 7, 14, 21 and 28 postpartum. Although the number of cows with an ovarian follicle and follicular size increased with days postpartum, mean concentrations of estradiol-17beta did not change. The interval from parturition to the first detected ovarian follicle and the first postpartum estrus was 17.5 +/- 2.6 days and 36.0 +/- 2.2 days, respectively. An elevation in plasma progesterone was detected about one week prior to the first postpartum estrus in 6 of the eight cows in the absence of corpora lutea. In experiment 2, gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) induced ovulation in 4 of the 8 cows treated on day 27, 28 or 29 postpartum whereas none of the 8 saline treated cows ovulated to treatment. The interval from parturition to first estrus and conception were similar for both groups (P >.10).     

Effect of intermittent injections of gonadotrophin releasing hormone at various frequencies on the release of luteinizing hormone and ovulation in dairy cows

Gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH, 5 μg every 4 h) was administered to six dairy cows between days 5 and 10 post-partum and the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) and the onset of ovulation were determined. LH was measured using a specific radioimmunoassay and the occurrence of ovulation was assessed from changes in the concentration of progesterone in milk. Treatment with GnRH resulted in a median time of first ovulation of 17.0 days after calving. This was less (P < 0.05) than that observed for control cows (21.5 days, n = 7). Determinations of plasma LH concentrations over an 8-h period on days 6 and 10 post-partum indicated that there was a tendency for GnRH-treated cows to have higher levels of LH on these days. The 5 μg dose of GnRH did not repeatably induce a release of LH between days 6 and 10. Endogenous pulsatile release of LH did, however, increase in frequency from 3.18 pulses per 8 h on day 6 to 5.18 pulses per 8 h on day 14 post-partum (P < 0.01).In a second experiment groups of 20 cows were treated with either 5 μg GnRH every 4 h or 15 μg GnRH every 12 h from days 5 to 10 post-partum. Seventeen untreated cows served as controls. The median times to first ovulation were 27.0 days for the control cows, 22.5 days for those cows treated with 5 μg GnRH every 4 h and 17.0 days for cows treated with 15 μg every 12 h. The latter treatment significantly advanced the time of first ovulation (P < 0.05) relative to controls. This difference had, however, disappeared by the time of the second and third ovulations. Primiparous cows ovulated later (P < 0.01) than the pluriparous cows in the group treated with 5 μg GnRH every 4 h. This was a major reason for the lack of effect of this treatment. Some treated cows were blood sampled at frequent intervals on day 8 to evaluate the LH responses to GnRH injections. The administration of 5 μg GnRH on day 8 did not elicit a pulse of LH which could be distinguished from endogenous pulsatile secretion at this time. The dose of 15 μg on this day did, however, elicit a more defined pulse on some, but not all, occasions.The injection of a small dose of GnRH twice a day from day 5 to day 10 after calving, therefore, advanced the time of first ovulation in dairy cows by 10 days.     

The timing of ovulation and insemination schedules in superstimulated cattle

The development of treatments that control follicular wave dynamics during the bovine estrous cycle has resulted in interesting possibilities for the precise control of follicular wave emergence and the time of ovulation. For superstimulation, follicular wave emergence can be controlled by ultrasound-guided follicle ablation with FSH treatments initiated 1 or 2 d later, or injection of estradiol combined with progesterone at the time of insertion of a progestogen releasing device and FSH treatments beginning 4 d later. These are the most widely used protocols for superstimulation of donor cows because they offer the convenience of being able to initiate treatments quickly and at a self-appointed time, without reducing the number of transferable embryos. However, these protocols still require precise estrus detection of donors following superstimulation in order to conduct AI at the most appropriate time. Recent studies have been designed to develop superstimulation protocols that involve fixed-time AI of donors, without regard to estrus detection. Results presented herein indicate that delaying the removal of a progestogen releasing device, combined with the administration of GnRH or porcine LH (pLH) 12 or 24 h later results in predictable, synchronous ovulations, permitting fixed-time AI without reducing the numbers or quality of embryos. These protocols facilitate the application of on-farm embryo transfer programs because they are practical, easy to administer by farm personnel, and more importantly, they eliminate the need for detecting estrus.     

The control of follicular wave development for self-appointed embryo transfer programs in cattle.

Our expanding knowledge of the control of follicular wave dynamics during the bovine estrous cycle has resulted in renewed enthusiasm for the prospects of precisely controlling the follicular and luteal dynamics and finely controlling the time of ovulation. Follicular wave development can be controlled mechanically by ultrasound-guided follicle ablation or hormonally by treatments with GnRH or estradiol and progestogen/progesterone in combination. Treatment of cattle with GnRH in combination with prostaglandin F2 alpha (PGF) 7 d later and a second GnRH 48 h after PGF (known as Ovsynch) has resulted in acceptable pregnancy rates after fixed-time AI in lactating dairy cows and in recipients in which embryos were transferred without estrus detection. Alternatively, treatments with estradiol and progestogen/progesterone-releasing devices resulted in synchronous emergence of a new follicular wave and, when a second estradiol treatment was given 24 h after device removal, synchronous ovulation and high pregnancy rates to fixed-time AI. Self-appointed embryo transfer (without estrus detection) using estradiol and progesterone treatments have resulted in pregnancy rates comparable with those obtained with recipients transferred 7 d after estrus. Furthermore, estradiol and progesterone treatments combined with PGF and eCG (given 1 d after the expected time of wave emergence) have resulted in high rates of recipients selected for transfer (84.6%) and an overall pregnancy rate of 48.7% (recipients pregnant/recipients treated). Estradiol and progestogen/progesterone treatments have also been widely used for self-appointed superstimulation protocols with equivalent embryo production to that of donor cows superstimulated using the traditional approach beginning 8 to 12 d after estrus. In summary, exogenous control of luteal and follicular development facilitates the application of assisted reproductive technologies in cattle by offering the possibility of planning the superstimulation of donors and synchronization of recipients at a self-appointed time, without the necessity of estrus detection and without sacrificing results.     

Effect of increasing GnRH and PGF2α dose during Double-Ovsynch on ovulatory response,luteal regression,and fertility of lactating dairy cows

Ovsynch-type synchronization of ovulation protocols have suboptimal synchronization rates due to reduced ovulation to the first GnRH treatment and inadequate luteolysis to the prostaglandin F_2α (PGF_2α) treatment before timed artificial insemination (TAI). Our objective was to determine whether increasing the dose of the first GnRH or the PGF_2α treatment during the Breeding-Ovsynch portion of Double-Ovsynch could improve the rates of ovulation and luteolysis and therefore increase pregnancies per artificial insemination (P/AI). In experiment 1, cows were randomly assigned to a two-by-two factorial design to receive either a low (L) or high (H) doses of GnRH (Gonadorelin; 100 vs. 200 μg) and a PGF_2α analogue (cloprostenol; 500 vs. 750 μg) resulting in the following treatments: LL (n = 263), HL (n = 277), LH (n = 270), and HH (n = 274). Transrectal ultrasonography and serum progesterone (P4) were used to assess ovulation to GnRH1, GnRH2, and luteal regression after PGF_2α during Breeding-Ovsynch in a subgroup of cows (n = 651 at each evaluation). Pregnancy status was assessed 29, 39, and 74 days after TAI. In experiment 2, cows were randomly assigned to LL (n = 220) or HH (n = 226) treatment as described for experiment 1. For experiment 1, ovulation to GnRH1 was greater (P = 0.01) for cows receiving H versus L GnRH (66.6% [217/326] vs. 57.5% [187/325]) treatment, but only for cows with elevated P4 at GnRH1. Cows that ovulated to GnRH1 had increased (P < 0.001) fertility compared with cows that did not ovulate (52.2% vs. 38.5%); however, no effect of higher dose of GnRH on fertility was detected. The greater PGF_2α dose increased luteal regression primarily in multiparous cows (P = 0.03) and tended to increase fertility (P = 0.05) only at the pregnancy diagnosis 39 days after TAI. Overall, P/AI was 47.0% at 29 days and 39.7% at 74 days after TAI; P/AI did not differ (P = 0.10) among treatments at 74 days (LL, 34.6%; HL, 40.8%; LH, 42.2%; HH, 40.9%) and was greater (P < 0.001) for primiparous cows than for multiparous cows (46.1% vs. 33.8%). For experiment 2, P/AI did not differ (P = 0.21) between H versus L treatments (44.2% [100/226] vs. 40.5% [89/220]). Thus, despite an increase in ovulatory response to GnRH1 and luteal regression to PGF_2α, there were only marginal effects of increasing dose of GnRH or PGF_2α on fertility to TAI after Double-Ovsynch.     

Fixed-time AI protocols replacing eCG with a single dose of FSH were less effective in stimulating follicular growth, ovulation, and fertility in suckled-anestrus Nelore beef cows

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effects of a single treatment with FSH on diameter of the largest follicle and on conception rates of suckled Bos indicus beef cows submitted to timed artificial insemination (TAI). Four hundred fifty-six suckled anestrous Nelore beef cows at 30-60 days postpartum were assigned to treatments. At the first day of the estrous synchronization protocol (Day 0), all cows received a progesterone-releasing intravaginal device plus 2mg of estradiol benzoate. On Day 8, cows were assigned to blocks according to the diameter of the largest follicle and then allocated to one of three treatment groups (Control, FSH, or eCG) within each block. Simultaneously to progesterone device withdrawal on Day 8, cows in the eCG treatment group (n=150) received 300 IU of eCG and cows in FSH treatment group (n=153) received 10mg of FSH, and Control cows (n=153) did not receive any additional treatment. Additional treatments with 150 μg of cloprostenol and 1mg of estradiol cypionate (EC) were also administered concurrently to progesterone device removal in all cows on Day 8. Two days later (D10), TAI and ovarian ultrasonic examinations to evaluate follicle size were performed in all cows. On Day 12, a subset of cows (n=389) were submitted a second ultrasonic exam to confirm ovulation. Final follicular growth (mm/day) was less (P=0.006) in both Control (0.95±0.11) and in FSH-treated cows (0.90±0.10) than in eCG-treated cows (1.40±0.13). Interestingly, there was a treatment-by-BCS interaction in ovulation results (P=0.03), in which, eCG treatment increased percentage of cows having ovulations with a lesser BCS. Similarly, there was a treatment-by-BCS interaction for conception (P=0.04), where the eCG treatment increased fertility in cows with a lesser BCS. In conclusion, FSH failed to stimulate final follicular growth, ovulation, and conception rate in sucked-anestrous beef cows submitted to TAI as effectively as eCG. However, physiological effects of eCG seem to be more evident in cows with a lesser BCS.