Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry of actin in various biochemical contexts

Hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (H/D MS) of monomeric actin (G-actin), polymeric actin (F-actin), phalloidin-bound F-actin and G-actin complexed with DNase I provides new insights into the architecture of F-actin and the effects of phalloidin and DNase I binding. Although the overall pattern of deuteration change supports the gross features of the Holmes F-actin model, two important differences were observed. Most significantly, no change in deuteration was observed in the critical "hydrophobic plug" region, suggesting this feature may not be present. Polymerization also produced deuteration increases for peptide fragments containing the ATP phosphate-binding loops, suggesting G-actin transitions to a more "open" conformation upon polymerization. However, polymerization produced decreases in deuteration mainly localized to the "inner", filament-axis side as predicted by the Holmes model. Mapping the phalloidin-induced decreases in F-actin deuteration onto the Lorenz binding site produced a single common patch straddling two monomers across the 1-start helix contact, again consistent with the Holmes architecture. Finally, both DNase I and phalloidin were able to alter the deuteration of regions distal to their respective binding sites. These results highlight the great opportunities for H/D MS to exploit high-resolution structures for detailed studies of the organization and dynamics of complex molecular assemblies.     

Yeast actin with a mutation in the "hydrophobic plug" between subdomains 3 and 4 (L266D) displays a cold-sensitive polymerization defect

Holmes et al. (Holmes, K. C., D. Popp, W. Gebhard, and W. Kabsch. 1990. Nature [Lond.] 347: 44-49) hypothesized that between subdomains 3 and 4 of actin is a loop of 10 amino acids including a four residue hydrophobic plug that inserts into a hydrophobic pocket formed by two adjacent monomers on the opposing strand thereby stabilizing the F- actin helix. To test this hypothesis we created a mutant yeast actin (L266D) by substituting Asp for Leu266 in the plug to disrupt this postulated hydrophobic interaction. Haploid cells expressing only this mutant actin were viable with no obvious altered phenotype at temperatures above 20 degrees C but were moderately cold-sensitive for growth compared with wild-type cells. The critical concentration for polymerization increased 10-fold at 4 degrees C compared with wild-type actin. The length of the nucleation phase of polymerization increased as the temperature decreased. At 4 degrees C nucleation was barely detectable. Addition of phalloidin-stabilized F-actin nuclei and phalloidin restored L266D actin''s ability to polymerize at 4 degrees C. This mutation also affects the overall rate of elongation during polymerization. Small effects of the mutation were observed on the exchange rate of ATP from G-actin, the G-actin intrinsic ATPase activity, and the activation of myosin S1 ATPase activity. Circular dichroism measurements showed a 15 degrees C decrease in melting temperature for the mutant actin from 57 degrees C to 42 degrees C. Our results are consistent with the model of Holmes et al. (Holmes, K. C., D. Popp, W. Gebhard, and W. Kabsch. 1990. Nature [Lond.]. 347:44-49) involving the role of the hydrophobic plug in actin filament stabilization.     

Tropomyosin prevents depolymerization of actin filaments from the pointed end

Regulation of the pointed, or slow-growing, end of actin filaments is essential to the regulation of filament length. The purpose of this study is to investigate the role of skeletal muscle tropomyosin (TM) in regulating pointed end assembly and disassembly in vitro. The effects of TM upon assembly and disassembly of actin monomers from the pointed filament end were measured using pyrenyl-actin fluorescence assays in which the barbed ends were capped by villin. Tropomyosin did not affect pointed end elongation; however, filament disassembly from the pointed end stopped in the presence of TM under conditions where control filaments disassembled within minutes. The degree of protection against depolymerization was dependent upon free TM concentration and upon filament length. When filaments were diluted to a subcritical actin concentration in TM, up to 95% of the filamentous actin remained after 24 h and did not depolymerize further. Longer actin filaments (150 monomers average length) were more effectively protected from depolymerization than short filaments (50 monomers average length). Although filaments stopped depolymerizing in the presence of TM, they were not capped as shown by elongation assays. This study demonstrates that a protein, such as TM, which binds to the side of the actin filament can prevent dissociation of monomers from the end without capping the end to elongation. In skeletal muscle, tropomyosin could prevent thin filament disassembly from the pointed end and constitute a mechanism for regulating filament length.     

Actin-actin contact: inhibition of actin-polymerization by subdomain 4 peptide fragments.

F-Actin was digested with alpha-chymotrypsin in 6 M urea, and two peptide fragments from subdomain 4 of actin molecule [Kabsch, W., Mannherz, H.G., Suck, D., Pai, E.F., & Holmes K.C. (1990) Nature 347, 37-44] were purified by reverse-phase HPLC and Sephadex G-50 gel filtration. The peptide fragments were identified as segments from Arg-177 to Tyr-198 (2.6-kDa peptide) and from Ser-199 to Tyr-279 (9.1-kDa peptide). Their effects on actin polymerization induced by 50 or 100 mM KCl were studied by measuring the increase in viscosity by the falling ball method. The 2.6-kDa peptide decreased the rate of actin polymerization and increased the critical concentration for the polymerization. Based on the atomic model of the actin filament [Holmes, K.C., Popp, D., Gebhard, W., & Kabsch, W. (1990) Nature 347, 44-49], the peptide is presumed to bind to the barbed end of the actin filament and inhibit the polymerization. By assuming that the peptide affected the rate of association of the actin monomer to the end of the actin filament, well-fitting curves for the polymerization kinetics were calculated. Computer-assisted results indicated that the dissociation constant of the 2.6-kDa peptide for F-actin is 200 to 260 microM. In contrast, the 9.1-kDa peptide only slightly inhibited actin polymerization. These results suggest that the actin-actin interface in the region between Arg-177 and Tyr-198 has a stronger interaction than those between Ser-199 and Tyr-279. The amino acid sequence L-T-D-Y-L present in the 2.6-kDa segment is homologous to a common sequence in the F-actin capping domain of various actin-binding proteins.     

A 13-A map of the actin-scruin filament from the limulus acrosomal process [published erratum appears in J Cell Biol 1993 Dec;123(6 Pt 1):1621]

We have determined the structure of the actin-scruin filament to 13-A resolution using a combination of low-dose EM and image analysis. The three-dimensional map reveals four actin-actin contacts: two within each strand and two between strands. The conformation of the actin subunit is different from that in the Holmes et al. (1990) model as refined by Lorenz et al. (1993). In particular, subdomain II is tilted in a similar way to that seen by Orlova and Egelman (1993) in F-Mg2(+)- ADP actin filaments in the absence of Ca2+. Scruin appears to consist of two domains of approximately equal volume. Each scruin subunit cross- links the two strands in the actin filament. Domain I of scruin contacts subdomain I of actin and makes a second contact at the junction of subdomains III and IV. Domain II of scruin contacts actin at subdomains I and II of a neighboring actin subunit. The two scruin domains thus bind differently to actin.     

Intermolecular dynamics and function in actin filaments

Structural models of F-actin suggest that three segments in actin, the DNase I binding loop (residues 38-52), the hydrophobic plug (residues 262-274) and the C-terminus, contribute to the formation of an intermolecular interface between three monomers in F-actin. To test these predictions and also to assess the dynamic properties of intermolecular contacts in F-actin, Cys-374 pyrene-labeled skeletal alpha-actin and pyrene-labeled yeast actin mutants, with Gln-41 or Ser-265 replaced with cysteine, were used in fluorescence experiments. Large differences in Cys-374 pyrene fluorescence among copolymers of subtilisin-cleaved (between Met-47 and Gly-48) and uncleaved alpha-actin showed both intra- and intermolecular interactions between the C-terminus and loop 38-52 in F-actin. Excimer band formation due to intermolecular stacking of pyrene probes attached to Cys-41 and Cys-265, and Cys-41 and Cys-374, in mutant yeast F-actin confirmed the proximity of these residues on the paired sites (to within 18 A) in accordance with the models of F-actin structure. The dynamic properties of the intermolecular interface in F-actin formed by loop 38-52, plug 262-274 and the C-terminus may account for the observed cross-linking of these sites with reagents < 18 A. The functional importance of actin filament dynamics was demonstrated by the inhibition of the in vitro motility in the Gln-41-Cys-374 cross-linked actin filaments.     

Role of actin-filament disassembly in lamellipodium protrusion in motile cells revealed using the drug jasplakinolide.

BACKGROUND: In motile cells, protrusion of the lamellipodium (a type of cell margin) requires assembly of actin monomers into actin filaments at the tip of the lamellipodium. The importance of actin-filament disassembly in this process is less well understood, and is assessed here using the actin drug jasplakinolide, which has two known activities - inhibition of filament disassembly and induction of an increase in actin polymer. RESULTS: In cells the two activities of jasplakinolide were found to be separable; 1 microM jasplakinolide could permeate cells, bind cellular filamentous actin (F-actin) and inhibit filament disassembly within 3.5 minutes, but significant increase in actin polymer was not detected until 60 minutes of treatment. In live, permeabilised cells, jasplakinolide did not inhibit filament assembly from supplied, purified actin monomers. In migrating chick fibroblasts, lamellipodium protrusion was blocked within 1-5 minutes of treatment with 1 microM jasplakinolide, without any perturbation of actin organisation. In non-migrating chick fibroblasts, there was a delay in the onset of jasplakinolide-induced inhibition of lamellipodium protrusion, during which lamellipodium length increased linearly with no increase in protrusion rate. Motility of the bacterium Listeria in infected PtK2 cells was reduced 2.3-fold within 3 minutes of treatment with 1 microM jasplakinolide. CONCLUSIONS: Actin-filament disassembly is tightly coupled to lamellipodium protrusion in migrating chick fibroblasts and motility of Listeria in PtK2 cells. One simple interpretation of these data is a situation whereby ongoing actin-filament assembly uses free actin monomer derived from filament disassembly, in preference to stored monomer.     

Biochemical and genetic analyses provide insight into the structural and mechanistic properties of actin filament disassembly by the Aip1p cofilin complex in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Explication of the Aip1p/cofilin/actin filament complex may lead to a more detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which Aip1p and cofilin collaborate to rapidly disassemble filaments. We further characterized the actin-Aip1p interface through a random mutagenic screen of ACT1, identifying a novel Aip1p interaction site on actin. This finding is consistent with our current ternary complex model and offers insights into how Aip1p may disturb intersubunit contacts within an actin filament. In addition, site-directed mutagenesis aimed at interfering with salt bridge interactions at the predicted Aip1p-cofilin interface revealed hyperactive alleles of cof1 and aip1 that support the ternary complex model and suggest that conformational changes in cofilin structure may be transmitted to actin filaments, causing increased destabilization. Furthermore, these data support an active role for Aip1p in promoting actin filament turnover.     

The second ADF/cofilin actin-binding site exists in F-actin, the cofilin-G-actin complex, but not in G-actin.

ADF/cofilins are actin binding proteins that bind actin close to both the N- and C-termini (site 1), and we have found a second cofilin binding site (site 2) centered around helix 112-125 [Renoult, C., Ternent, D., Maciver, S.K., Fattoum, A., Astier, C., Benyamin, Y. & Roustan, C. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 28893-28899]. We proposed a model in which ADF/cofilin intercalated between subdomains 1 and 2 of two longitudinally associated actin monomers within the actin:cofilin cofilament, explaining the change in twist that ADF/cofilins induce in the filament [McGough, A. Pope, B., Chiu, W. & Weeds, A. (1998) J. Cell Biol. 138, 771-781]. Here, we have determined the fuller extent of the cofilin footprint on site 1 of actin. Site 1 is primarily the G-actin binding site. Experiments with both peptide mimetics and fluorescently labeled cofilin suggest that site 2 only becomes available for cofilin binding within the filament, possibly due to motion between subdomains 1 and 2 within an actin monomer. We have detected motion between subdomains 1 and 2 of G-actin by FRET induced by cofilin, to reveal the second cofilin-binding site. This motion may also explain how cofilins inhibit the nucleotide exchange of actin, and why the actin:cofilin complex is polymerizable without dissociation.     

Effect of capping protein on the kinetics of actin polymerization

Acanthamoeba capping protein increased the rate of actin polymerization from monomers with and without calcium. In the absence of calcium, capping protein also increased the critical concentration for polymerization. Various models were evaluated for their ability to predict the effect of capping protein on kinetic curves for actin polymerization under conditions where the critical concentration was not changed. Several models, which might explain the increased rate of polymerization from monomers, were tested. Two models which predicted the experimental data poorly were (1) capping protein was similar to an actin filament, bypassing nucleation, and (2) capping protein fragmented filaments. Three models in which capping protein accelerated, but did not bypass, nucleation predicted the data well. In the best one, capping protein resembled a nondissociable actin dimer. Several lines of evidence have supported the idea that capping protein blocks the barbed end of actin filaments, preventing the addition and loss of monomers [Cooper, J. A., Blum, J. D., & Pollard, T. D. (1984) J. Cell Biol. 99, 217-225; Isenberg, G. A., Aebi, U., & Pollard, T. D. (1980) Nature (London) 288, 455-459]. This mechanism was also supported here by the effect of capping protein on the kinetics of actin polymerization which was nucleated by preformed actin filaments. Low capping protein concentrations slowed nucleated polymerization, presumably because capping protein blocked elongation at barbed ends of filaments. High capping protein concentrations accelerated nucleated polymerization because of capping protein's ability to interact with monomers and accelerate nucleation.     

Cooperativity in F-actin: chemical modifications of actin monomers affect the functional interactions of myosin with unmodified monomers in the same actin filament.

We have chemically modified a fraction of the monomers in actin filaments, and then measured the effects on the functional interaction of myosin with unmodified monomers within the same filament. Two modifications were used: (a) covalent attachment of various amounts of myosin subfragment-1 (S1) with the bifunctional reagent disuccinimidyl suberate and (b) copolymerization of unmodified actin monomers with monomers cross-linked internally with 1-ethyl-3-(dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide. Each of these modifications abolished the interaction of the modified monomers with myosin, so the remaining interactions were exclusively with unmodified monomers. The two modifications had similar effects on the interaction of actin with myosin in solution: decreased affinity of myosin heads for unmodified actin monomers, without a change in the Vmax of actin-activated myosin ATPase activity. However, modification (b) produced much greater inhibition of actin sliding on a myosin-coated surface, as measured by an in vitro motility assay. These results provide insight into the functional consequences of cooperative interactions within the actin filament.     

Determination of the alpha-actinin-binding site on actin filaments by cryoelectron microscopy and image analysis

The three-dimensional structure of actin filaments decorated with the actin-binding domain of chick smooth muscle alpha-actinin (alpha A1-2) has been determined to 21-A resolution. The shape and location of alpha A1-2 was determined by subtracting maps of F-actin from the reconstruction of decorated filaments. alpha A1-2 resembles a bell that measures approximately 38 A at its base and extends 42 A from its base to its tip. In decorated filaments, the base of alpha A1-2 is centered about the outer face of subdomain 2 of actin and contacts subdomain 1 of two neighboring monomers along the long-pitch (two-start) helical strands. Using the atomic model of F-actin (Lorenz, M., D. Popp, and K. C. Holmes. 1993. J. Mol. Biol. 234:826-836.), we have been able to test directly the likelihood that specific actin residues, which have been previously identified by others, interact with alpha A1-2. Our results indicate that residues 86-117 and 350-375 comprise distinct binding sites for alpha-actinin on adjacent actin monomers.     

Structural basis for the destabilization of F-actin by phosphate release following ATP hydrolysis.

The role of ATP hydrolysis in actin polymerization has been a puzzle, since it is known that polymer formation is possible without the ATPase activity and that the ATPase lags behind polymerization. We have used beryllium fluoride and G-ADP actin monomers to form F-ADP-BeF3- filaments that are a stable analog for either the ATP or the ADP-P(i) state. Electron microscopy and computed three-dimensional reconstruction have been used to compare this state to control actin, F-ADP, polymerized from G-ATP. We find, at a high degree of statistical significance, that subdomain-2 of the actin protomer in the ADP-BeF3- state is in a conformation very similar to that found in the atomic model for F-actin of Holmes and co-workers, but becomes disordered after the release of the phosphate. This breaks one of the longitudinal bonds in the filament, consistent with biochemical observations that phosphate release destabilizes F-actin. We have also found that lithium, which reduces the dissociation rate constant of actin filaments, induces a structural state indistinguishable from that of ADP-BeF3-. Further, in all states about ten C-terminal residues are displaced from the above mentioned model, but that the fit of the rest of the monomer is in excellent agreement, supporting the uniqueness of the solution they found and precluding a significantly different arrangement of the actin monomer in the filament.     

Hydrolysis of ATP by polymerized actin depends on the bound divalent cation but not profilin.

Growing evidence suggests that the nucleotide bound to actin filaments serves as a timer to control actin filament turnover during cell motility (Pollard, T. D., Blanchoin, L., and Mullins, R. D. (2000) Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29, 545-576). We re-examined the hydrolysis of ATP by polymerized actin using mechanical quenched-flow methods to improve temporal resolution. The rate constant for ATP hydrolysis by polymerized Mg actin is 0.3 s(-1), 3-fold faster than that measured manually. The ATP hydrolysis rate is similar when Mg ATP actin elongates either the pointed end or the barbed end of filaments. Polymerized Ca actin hydrolyzes ATP at 0.05 s(-1). Mg ATP actin saturated with profilin can elongate barbed ends at >60 s(-1), 2 orders of magnitude faster than ATP hydrolysis (0.3 s(-1)). Given that profilin binds to a surface on actin that is buried in the Holmes model of the actin filament, we expect that profilin will block subunit addition at the barbed end of a filament. Profilin must move from this site at rates much faster than it dissociates from monomers (4 s(-1)). ATP hydrolysis is not required for this movement.     

Action of cytochalasin D on cytoskeletal networks

Extraction of SC-1 cells (African green monkey kidney) with the detergent Triton X-100 in combination with stereo high-voltage electron microscopy of whole mount preparations has been used as an approach to determine the mode of action of cytochalasin D on cells. The cytoskeleton of extracted BSC-1 cells consists of substrate-associated filament bundles (stress fibers) and a highly cross-linked network of four major filament types extending throughout the cell body; 10-nm filaments, actin microfilaments, microtubules, and 2- to 3-nm filaments. Actin filaments and 2- to 3-nm filaments form numerous end- to-side contacts with other cytoskeletal filaments. Cytochalasin D treatment severely disrupts network organization, increases the number of actin filament ends, and leads to the formation of filamentous aggregates or foci composed mainly of actin filaments. Metabolic inhibitors prevent filament redistribution, foci formation, and cell arborization, but not disorganization of the three-dimensional filament network. In cells first extracted and then treated with cytochalasin D, network organization is disrupted, and the number of free filament ends is increased. Supernates of preparations treated in this way contain both short actin filaments and network fragments (i.e., actin filaments in end-to-side contact with other actin filaments). It is proposed that the dramatic effects of cytochalasin D on cells result from both a direct interaction of the drug with the actin filament component of cytoskeletal networks and a secondary cellular response. The former leads to an immediate disruption of the ordered cytoskeletal network that appears to involve breaking of actin filaments, rather than inhibition of actin filament-filament interactions (i.e., disruption of end-to-side contacts). The latter engages network fragments in an energy-dependent (contractile) event that leads to the formation of filament foci.     

Quantitative analysis of the effect of Acanthamoeba profilin on actin filament nucleation and elongation

The current view of the mechanism of action of Acanthamoeba profilin is that it binds to actin monomers, forming a complex that cannot polymerize [Tobacman, L. S., & Korn, E. D. (1982) J. Biol. Chem. 257, 4166-4170; Tseng, P., & Pollard, T. D. (1982) J. Cell Biol. 94, 213-218; Tobacman, L. S., Brenner, S. L., & Korn, E. D. (1983) J. Biol. Chem. 258, 8806-8812]. This simple model fails to predict two new experimental observations made with Acanthamoeba actin in 50 mM KC1, 1 mM MgCl2, and 1 mM EGTA. First, Acanthamoeba profilin inhibits elongation of actin filaments far more at the pointed end than at the barbed end. According, to the simple model, the Kd for the profilin-actin complex is less than 5 microM on the basis of observations at the pointed end and greater than 50 microM for the barbed end. Second, profilin inhibits nucleation more strongly than elongation. According to the simple model, the Kd for the profilin-actin complex is 60-140 microM on the basis of two assays of elongation but 2-10 microM on the basis of polymerization kinetics that reflect nucleation. These new findings can be explained by a new and more complex model for the mechanism of action that is related to a proposal of Tilney and co-workers [Tilney, L. G., Bonder, E. M., Coluccio, L. M., & Mooseker, M. S. (1983) J. Cell Biol. 97, 113-124]. In this model, profilin can bind both to actin monomers with a Kd of about 5 microM and to the barbed end of actin filaments with a Kd of about 50-100 microM. An actin monomer bound to profilin cannot participate in nucleation or add to the pointed end of an actin filament. It can add to the barbed end of a filament. When profilin is bound to the barbed end of a filament, actin monomers cannot bind to that end, but the terminal actin protomer can dissociate at the usual rate. This model includes two different Kd's--one for profilin bound to actin monomers and one for profilin bound to an actin molecule at the barbed end of a filament. The affinity for the end of the filament is lower by a factor of 10 than the affinity for the monomer, presumably due to the difference in the conformation of the two forms of actin or to steric constraints at the end of the filament.     

Hydrophobic loop dynamics and actin filament stability

It has been postulated that the hydrophobic loop of actin (residues 262-274) swings out and inserts into the opposite strand in the filament, stabilizing the filament structure. Here, we analyzed the hydrophobic loop dynamics utilizing four mutants that have cysteine residues introduced at a single location along the yeast actin loop. Lateral, copper-catalyzed disulfide cross-linking of the mutant cysteine residues to the native C374 in the neighboring strand within the filament was fastest for S265C, followed by V266C, L267C, and then L269C. Site-directed spin labeling (SDSL) studies revealed that C265 lies closest to C374 within the filament, followed by C266, C267, and then C269. These results are not predicted by the Holmes extended loop model of F-actin. Furthermore, we find that disulfide cross-linking destroys L267C and L269C filaments; only small filaments are observed via electron microscopy. Conversely, phalloidin protects the L267C and L269C filaments and inhibits their disulfide cross-linking. Combined, our data indicate that, in solution, the loop resides predominantly in a "parked" position within the filament but is able to dynamically populate other conformational states which stabilize or destabilize the filament. Such states may be exploited within a cell by filament-stabilizing and -destabilizing factors.     

Orientation of skeletal muscle actin in strong magnetic fields

Measurement of birefringence is used to follow actin filament and paracrystal formation in a strong magnetic field. Both F-actin and paracrystals orientate parallel to the field. This confirms that globular proteins arranged in filamentous assemblies can orientate in magnetic fields. This is consistent with the alpha-helical component of the actin subunits being approximately aligned along the actin filament.     

New Aspects of the Spontaneous Polymerization of Actin in the Presence of Salts

The mechanism of salt-induced actin polymerization involves the energetically unfavorable nucleation step, followed by filament elongation by the addition of monomers. The use of a bifunctional cross-linker, N,N′-(1,4-phenylene)dimaleimide, revealed rapid formation of the so-called lower dimers (LD) in which actin monomers are arranged in an antiparallel fashion. The filament elongation phase is characterized by a gradual LD decay and an increase in the yield of “upper dimers” (UD) characteristic of F-actin. Here we have used 90° light scattering, electron microscopy, and N,N′-(1,4-phenylene)dimaleimide cross-linking to reinvestigate relationships between changes in filament morphology, LD decay, and increase in the yield of UD during filament growth in a wide range of conditions influencing the rate of the nucleation reaction. The results show irregularity and instability of filaments at early stages of polymerization under all conditions used, and suggest that an earlier documented coassembling of LD with monomeric actin contributes to the initial disordering of the filaments rather than to the nucleation of polymerization. The effects of the type of G-actin-bound divalent cation (Ca²⁺/Mg²⁺), nucleotide (ATP/ADP), and polymerizing salt on the relation between changes in filament morphology and progress in G-actin-to-F-actin transformation show that ligand-dependent alterations in G-actin conformation determine not only the nucleation rate but also the kinetics of ordering of the filament structure in the elongation phase. The time courses of changes in the yield of UD suggest that filament maturation involves cooperative propagation of “proper” interprotomer contacts. Acceleration of this process by the initially bound MgATP supports the view that the filament-destabilizing conformational changes triggered by ATP hydrolysis and P_i liberation during polymerization are constrained by the intermolecular contacts established between MgATP monomers prior to ATP hydrolysis. An important role of contacts involving the DNase-I-binding loop and the C-terminus of actin is proposed.     

Crystal structure of polymerization-competent actin

All actin crystal structures reported to date represent actin complexed or chemically modified with molecules that prevent its polymerization. Actin cleaved with ECP32 protease at a single site between Gly42 and Val43 is virtually non-polymerizable in the Ca-ATP bound form but remains polymerization-competent in the Mg-bound form. Here, a crystal structure of the true uncomplexed ECP32-cleaved actin (ECP-actin) solved to 1.9 A resolution is reported. In contrast to the much more open conformation of the ECP-actin's nucleotide binding cleft in solution, the crystal structure of uncomplexed ECP-actin contains actin in a typical closed conformation similar to the complexed actin structures. This unambiguously demonstrates that the overall structure of monomeric actin is not significantly affected by a multitude of actin-binding proteins and toxins. The invariance of actin crystal structures suggests that the salt and precipitants necessary for crystallization stabilize actin in only one of its possible conformations. The asymmetric unit cell contains a new type of antiparallel actin dimer that may correspond to the "lower dimer" implicated in F-actin nucleation and branching. In addition, symmetry-related actin-actin contacts form a head to tail dimer that is strikingly similar to the longitudinal dimer predicted by the Holmes F-actin model, including a rotation of the monomers relative to each other not observed previously in actin crystal structures.