Saccharomyces cerevisiae RAD5 influences the excision repair of DNA minor groove adducts

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the primary pathway for the removal of DNA adducts that distort the double helix. In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae the RAD6 epistasis group defines a more poorly characterized set of DNA damage response pathways, believed to be distinct from NER. Here we show that the elimination of the DNA minor groove adducts formed by an important class of anticancer antibiotic (CC-1065 family) requires NER factors in S. cerevisiae. We also demonstrate that the elimination of this class of minor groove adduct from the active MFA2 gene depends upon functional Rad18 and Rad6. This is most clear for the repair of adducts on the transcribed strand, where an absolute requirement for Rad6 and Rad18 was seen. Further experiments revealed that a specific RAD6-RAD18-controlled subpathway, the RAD5 branch, mediates these events. Cells disrupted for rad5 are highly sensitive to this minor groove binding agent, and rad5 cells exhibit an in vivo adduct elimination defect indistinguishable from that seen in rad6 and rad18 cells as well as in NER-defective cells. Our results indicate that the RAD5 subpathway may interact with NER factors during the repair of certain DNA adducts.     

The RAD7 and RAD16 genes, which are essential for pyrimidine dimer removal from the silent mating type loci, are also required for repair of the nontranscribed strand of an active gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

The rad16 mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae was previously shown to be impaired in removal of UV-induced pyrimidine dimers from the silent mating-type loci (D. D. Bang, R. A. Verhage, N. Goosen, J. Brouwer, and P. van de Putte, Nucleic Acids Res. 20:3925-3931, 1992). Here we show that rad7 as well as rad7 rad16 double mutants have the same repair phenotype, indicating that the RAD7 and RAD16 gene products might operate in the same nucleotide excision repair subpathway. Dimer removal from the genome overall is essentially incomplete in these mutants, leaving about 20 to 30% of the DNA unrepaired. Repair analysis of the transcribed RPB2 gene shows that the nontranscribed strand is not repaired at all in rad7 and rad16 mutants, whereas the transcribed strand is repaired in these mutants at a fast rate similar to that in RAD+ cells. When the results obtained with the RPB2 gene can be generalized, the RAD7 and RAD16 proteins not only are essential for repair of silenced regions but also function in repair of nontranscribed strands of active genes in S. cerevisiae. The phenotype of rad7 and rad16 mutants closely resembles that of human xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XP-C) cells, suggesting that RAD7 and RAD16 in S. cerevisiae function in the same pathway as the XPC gene in human cells. RAD4, which on the basis of sequence homology has been proposed to be the yeast XPC counterpart, seems to be involved in repair of both inactive and active yeast DNA, challenging the hypothesis that RAD4 and XPC are functional homologs.     

Two budding yeast RAD4 homologs in fission yeast play different roles in the repair of UV-induced DNA damage

We have identified two fission yeast homologs of budding yeast Rad4 and human xeroderma pigmentosum complementation group C (XP-C) correcting protein, designated Rhp4A and Rhp4B. Here we show that the rhp4 genes encode NER factors that are required for UV-induced DNA damage repair in fission yeast. The rhp4A-deficient cells but not the rhp4B-deficient cells are sensitive to UV irradiation. However, the disruption of both rhp4A and rhp4B resulted in UV sensitivity that was greater than that of the rhp4A-deficient cells, revealing that Rhp4B plays a role in DNA repair on its own. Fission yeast has two pathways to repair photolesions on DNA, namely, nucleotide excision repair (NER) and UV-damaged DNA endonuclease-dependent excision repair (UVER). Studies with the NER-deficient rad13 and the UVER-deficient (Delta)uvde mutants showed the two rhp4 genes are involved in NER and not UVER. Assessment of the ability of the various mutants to remove cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) from the rbp2 gene locus indicated that Rhp4A is involved in the preferential repair of lesions on the transcribed DNA strand and plays the major role in fission yeast NER. Rhp4B in contrast acts as an accessory protein in non-transcribed strand (NTS) repair.     

RAD1 and RAD10, but not other excision repair genes, are required for double-strand break-induced recombination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

HO endonuclease-induced double-strand breaks (DSBs) in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae can be repaired by the process of gap repair or, alternatively, by single-strand annealing if the site of the break is flanked by directly repeated homologous sequences. We have shown previously (J. Fishman-Lobell and J. E. Haber, Science 258:480-484, 1992) that during the repair of an HO-induced DSB, the excision repair gene RAD1 is needed to remove regions of nonhomology from the DSB ends. In this report, we present evidence that among nine genes involved in nucleotide excision repair, only RAD1 and RAD10 are required for removal of nonhomologous sequences from the DSB ends. rad1 delta and rad10 delta mutants displayed a 20-fold reduction in the ability to execute both gap repair and single-strand annealing pathways of HO-induced recombination. Mutations in RAD2, RAD3, and RAD14 reduced HO-induced recombination by about twofold. We also show that RAD7 and RAD16, which are required to remove UV photodamage from the silent HML, locus, are not required for MAT switching with HML or HMR as a donor. Our results provide a molecular basis for understanding the role of yeast nucleotide excision repair gene and their human homologs in DSB-induced recombination and repair.     

紫外照射对DNA修复基因RAD24转录的影响

以酿酒酵母HY684为实验对象,用波长254nm紫外线分别在0,37,50和70J/m~2等强度下照射不同时间,提取总RNA,应用North-ern杂交方法检测RAD24基因转录水平的变化。结果显示37J/m~2、50J/m~2照射20分钟到120分钟明显提高RAD24基因转录水平,70J/m~2照射时,则恢复至正常水平,这说明低剂量紫外线照射可提高RAD24基因转录水平,该基因的表达具有损伤诱导性。     

Characterization of the rhp7(+) and rhp16(+) genes in Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

The global genome repair (GGR) subpathway of nucleotide excision repair (NER) is capable of removing lesions throughout the genome. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae the RAD7 and RAD16 genes are essential for GGR. Here we identify rhp7 (+), the RAD7 homolog in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Surprisingly, rhp7 (+)and the previously cloned rhp16 (+)are located very close together and are transcribed in opposite directions. Upon UV irradiation both genes are induced, reaching a maximum level after 45-60 min. These observations suggest that the genes are co-regulated. Schizo-saccharomyces pombe rhp7 or rhp16 deficient cells are, in contrast to S.cerevisiae rad7 and rad16 mutants, not sensitive to UV irradiation. In S.pombe an alternative repair mechanism, UV damage repair (UVDR), is capable of efficiently removing photolesions from DNA. In the absence of this UVDR pathway both rhp7 and rhp16 deficient cells display an enhanced UV sensitivity. Epistatic analyses show that rhp7 (+)and rhp16 (+)are only involved in NER. Repair analyses at nucleotide resolution demonstrate that both Rhp7 and Rhp16, probably acting in a complex, are essential for GGR in S.pombe.     

Saccharomyces cerevisiae exonuclease-1 plays a role in UV resistance that is distinct from nucleotide excision repair.

Two closely related genes, EXO1 and DIN 7, in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae have been found to be sequence homologs of the exo1 gene from the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe . The proteins encoded by these genes belong to the Rad2/XPG and Rad27/FEN-1 families, which are structure-specific nucleases functioning in DNA repair. An XPG nuclease deficiency in humans is one cause of xeroderma pigmentosum and those afflicted display a hypersensitivity to UV light. Deletion of the RAD2 gene in S. cerevisiae also causes UV hypersensitivity, due to a defect in nucleotide excision repair (NER), but residual UV resistance remains. In this report, we describe evidence for the residual repair of UV damage to DNA that is dependent upon Exo1 nuclease. Expression of the EXO1 gene is UV inducible. Genetic analysis indicates that the EXO1 gene is involved in a NER-independent pathway for UV repair, as exo1 rad2 double mutants are more sensitive to UV than either the rad2 or exo1 single mutants. Since the roles of EXO1 in mismatch repair and recombination have been established, double mutants were constructed to examine the possible relationship between the role of EXO1 in UV resistance and its roles in other pathways for repair of UV damaged DNA. The exo1 msh2 , exo1 rad51 , rad2 rad51 and rad2 msh2 double mutants were all more sensitive to UV than their respective pairs of single mutants. This suggests that the observed UV sensitivity of the exo1 deletion mutant is unlikely to be due to its functional deficiencies in MMR, recombination or NER. Further, it suggests that the EXO1 , RAD51 and MSH2 genes control independent mechanisms for the maintenance of UV resistance.     

Increased UV resistance of a xeroderma pigmentosum revertant cell line is correlated with selective repair of the transcribed strand of an expressed gene.

A UV-resistant revertant (XP129) of a xeroderma pigmentosum group A cell line has been reported to be totally deficient in repair of cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers (CPDs) but proficient in repair of 6-4 photoproducts. This finding has been interpreted to mean that CPDs play no role in cell killing by UV. We have analyzed the fine structure of repair of CPDs in the dihydrofolate reductase gene in the revertant. In this essential, active gene, we observe that repair of the transcribed strand is as efficient as that in normal, repair-proficient human cells, but repair of the nontranscribed strand is not. Within 4 h after UV at 7.5 J/m2, over 50% of the CPDs were removed, and by 8 h, 80% of the CPDs were removed. In contrast, there was essentially no removal from the nontranscribed strand even by 24 h. Our results demonstrate that overall repair measurements can be misleading, and they support the hypothesis that removal of CPDs from the transcribed strands of expressed genes is essential for UV resistance.