Cell Adhesion, the Backbone of the Synapse: ��Vertebrate�� and ��Invertebrate�� Perspectives

Synapses are asymmetric intercellular junctions that mediate neuronal communication. The number, type, and connectivity patterns of synapses determine the formation, maintenance, and function of neural circuitries. The complexity and specificity of synaptogenesis relies upon modulation of adhesive properties, which regulate contact initiation, synapse formation, maturation, and functional plasticity. Disruption of adhesion may result in structural and functional imbalance that may lead to neurodevelopmental diseases, such as autism, or neurodegeneration, such as Alzheimer''s disease. Therefore, understanding the roles of different adhesion protein families in synapse formation is crucial for unraveling the biology of neuronal circuit formation, as well as the pathogenesis of some brain disorders. The present review summarizes some of the knowledge that has been acquired in vertebrate and invertebrate genetic model organisms.Synapses are asymmetric, intercellular junctions that are the basic structural units of neuronal transmission. The correct development of synaptic specializations and the establishment of appropriate connectivity patterns are crucial for the assembly of functional neuronal circuits. Improper synapse formation and function may cause neurodevelopmental disorders, such as mental retardation (MsR) and autism spectrum disorders (ASD) (McAllister 2007; Sudhof 2008), and likely play a role in neurodegenerative disorders, such as Alzheimer''s disease (AD) (Haass and Selkoe 2007).At chemical synapses (reviewed in Sudhof 2004; Zhai and Bellen 2004; Waites et al. 2005; McAllister 2007; Jin and Garner 2008), the presynaptic compartment contains synaptic vesicles (SV), organized in functionally distinct subcellular pools. A subset of SVs docks to the presynaptic membrane around protein-dense release sites, named active zones (AZ). Upon the arrival of an action potential at the terminal, the docked and “primed” SVs fuse with the plasma membrane and release neurotransmitter molecules into the synaptic cleft. Depending on the type of synapse (i.e., excitatory vs. inhibitory synapses), neurotransmitters ultimately activate an appropriate set of postsynaptic receptors that are accurately apposed to the AZ.Synapse formation occurs in several steps (Fig. 1) (reviewed in Eaton and Davis 2003; Goda and Davis 2003; Waites et al. 2005; Garner et al. 2006; Gerrow and El-Husseini 2006; McAllister 2007). Spatiotemporal signals guide axons through heterogeneous cellular environments to contact appropriate postsynaptic targets. At their destination, axonal growth cones initiate synaptogenesis through adhesive interactions with target cells. In the mammalian central nervous system (CNS), immature postsynaptic dendritic spines initially protrude as thin, actin-rich filopodia on the surface of dendrites. Similarly, at the Drosophila neuromuscular junction (NMJ), myopodia develop from the muscles (Ritzenthaler et al. 2000). The stabilization of intercellular contacts and their elaboration into mature, functional synapses involves cytoskeletal arrangements and recruitment of pre- and postsynaptic components to contact sites in spines and boutons. Conversely, retraction of contacts results in synaptic elimination. Both stabilization and retraction sculpt a functional neuronal circuitry.Open in a separate windowFigure 1.(A–C) Different stages of synapse formation. (A) Target selection, (B) Synapse assembly, (C) Synapse maturation and stabilization. (D–F) The role of cell adhesion molecules in synapse formation is exemplified by the paradigm of N-cadherin and catenins in regulation of the morphology and strength of dendritic spine heads. (D) At an early stage the dendritic spines are elongated from motile structures “seeking” their synaptic partners. (E) The contacts between the presynaptic and postsynaptic compartments are stabilized by recruitment of additional cell adhesion molecules. Adhesional interactions activate downstream pathways that remodel the cytoskeleton and organize pre- and postsynaptic apparatuses. (F) Cell adhesion complexes, stabilized by increased synaptic activity, promote the expansion of the dendritic spine head and the maturation/ stabilization of the synapse. Retraction and expansion is dependent on synaptic plasticity.In addition to the plastic nature of synapse formation, the vast heterogeneity of synapses (in terms of target selection, morphology, and type of neurotransmitter released) greatly enhances the complexity of synaptogenesis (reviewed in Craig and Boudin 2001; Craig et al. 2006; Gerrow and El-Husseini 2006). The complexity and specificity of synaptogenesis relies upon the modulation of adhesion between the pre- and postsynaptic components (reviewed in Craig et al. 2006; Gerrow and El-Husseini 2006; Piechotta et al. 2006; Dalva et al. 2007; Shapiro et al. 2007; Yamada and Nelson 2007; Gottmann 2008). Cell adhesive interactions enable cell–cell recognition via extracellular domains and also mediate intracellular signaling cascades that affect synapse morphology and organize scaffolding complexes. Thus, cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) coordinate multiple synaptogenic steps.However, in vitro and in vivo studies of vertebrate CAMs are often at odds with each other. Indeed, there are no examples of mutants for synaptic CAMs that exhibit prominent defects in synapse formation. This apparent “resilience” of synapses is probably caused by functional redundancy or compensatory effects among different CAMs (Piechotta et al. 2006). Hence, studies using simpler organisms less riddled by redundancy, such as Caenorhabditis elegans and Drosophila, have aided in our understanding of the role that these molecules play in organizing synapses.In this survey, we discuss the roles of the best characterized CAM families of proteins involved in synaptogenesis. Our focus is to highlight the complex principles that govern the molecular basis of synapse formation and function from a comparative perspective. We will present results from cell culture studies as well as in vivo analyses in vertebrate systems and refer to invertebrate studies, mainly performed in Drosophila and C. elegans, when they have provided important insights into the role of particular CAM protein families. However, we do not discuss secreted factors, for which we refer the reader to numerous excellent reviews (as for example Washbourne et al. 2004; Salinas 2005; Piechotta et al. 2006; Shapiro et al. 2006; Dalva 2007; Yamada and Nelson 2007; Biederer and Stagi 2008; Salinas and Zou 2008).     

��The Climax of Reconciliation��: Transgression, Apology, Forgiveness and the Body in Conflict Resolution

According to Charles Hauss, “[i]n the last few years, reconciliation has become one of the ‘hottest’ topics in the increasingly ‘hot’ field of conflict resolution” (2003, ?1). However, despite the apparent interest in this “hot” academic topic (which is becoming increasingly warm in Canada as our own Truth and Reconciliation Commission commences), reconciliation studies have been dominated by Truth-based approaches. The restrictions of these approaches, which emphasize objectivity and rationality, often elide the body and the primacy of emotions in the reparative process. This essay begins a conversation on the role of the body and emotion in the study of reconciliation by engaging the work being done in the social sciences with contemporary trends in critical theory and literature. I argue that by looking at the fundamental role the body plays on the “road to reconciliation” we can devise a more vital approach to conflict resolution and the various processes that make it up.     

Investigations of �� Initiator Protein-mediated Interaction between Replication Origins �� and �� of the Plasmid R6K

A typical plasmid replicon of Escherichia coli, such as ori γ of R6K, contains tandem iterons (iterated initiator protein binding sites), an AT-rich region that melts upon initiator-iteron interaction, two binding sites for the bacterial initiator protein DnaA, and a binding site for the DNA-bending protein IHF. R6K also contains two structurally atypical origins called α and β that are located on either side of γ and contain a single and a half-iteron, respectively. Individually, these sites do not bind to initiator protein π but access it by DNA looping-mediated interaction with the seven π-bound γ iterons. The π protein exists in 2 interconvertible forms: inert dimers and active monomers. Initiator dimers generally function as negative regulators of replication by promoting iteron pairing (“handcuffing”) between pairs of replicons that turn off both origins. Contrary to this existing paradigm, here we show that both the dimeric and the monomeric π are necessary for ori α-driven plasmid maintenance. Furthermore, efficient looping interaction between α and γ or between 2 γ iterons in vitro also required both forms of π. Why does α-γ iteron pairing promote α activation rather than repression? We show that a weak, transitory α-γ interaction at the iteron pairs was essential for α-driven plasmid maintenance. Swapping the α iteron with one of γ without changing the original sequence context that caused enhanced looping in vitro caused a significant inhibition of α-mediated plasmid maintenance. Therefore, the affinity of α iteron for π-bound γ and not the sequence context determined whether the origin was activated or repressed.     

Efficacy and safety of the ��mother��s kiss�� technique: a systematic review of case reports and case series

Background:

Foreign bodies lodged in the nasal cavity are a common problem in children, and their removal can be challenging. The published studies relating to the “mother’s kiss” all take the form of case reports and case series. We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of this technique.

Methods:

We performed a comprehensive search of the Cochrane library, MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, AMED Complementary and Allied Medicine and the British Nursing Index for relevant articles. We restricted the results to only those studies involving humans. In addition, we checked the references of relevant studies to identify further possibly relevant studies. We also checked current controlled trials registers and the World Health Organization search portal. Our primary outcome measures were the successful extraction of the foreign object from the nasal cavity and any reported adverse effects. We assessed the included studies for factors that might predict the chance of success of the technique. We assessed the validity of each study using the Newcastle–Ottawa scale.

Results:

Eight relevant published articles met our inclusion criteria. The overall success rate for all of the case series was 59.9% (91/152). No adverse effects were reported.

Interpretation:

Evidence from case reports and case series suggests that the mother’s kiss technique is a useful and safe first-line option for the removal of foreign bodies from the nasal cavities of children.Nasal foreign bodies are a common problem in children, most frequently occurring between the ages of 2 and 5 years, and their removal can be challenging.^1,2 Children in this age group have a natural fear of the unknown, and providing care to them can be difficult, especially if previous attempts to remove the foreign body have been painful.Potential complications, most notably the risk of aspiration of the foreign body, mean that objects should be removed from the nasal cavity in a timely fashion. Various techniques have been described: instrumental extraction (using a hook or nasal forceps), suction, balloon catheters,³ cyanoacrylate glue⁴ and various positive-pressure techniques, the simplest of which is to ask the child to blow his or her nose while occluding the unaffected nostril. However, this technique is only possible for older children.⁵ Alternatively, a bag valve mask can be applied over the child’s face, the bag then squeezed to apply a puff of air into the child’s mouth;⁶ a male–male tube adaptor can be attached to an oxygen or air outlet via oxygen tubing placed in the unaffected nostril;⁷ or the “mother’s kiss” or “parent’s kiss” technique can be used.The mother’s kiss was first described in 1965 by Vladimir Ctibor, a general practitioner from New Jersey.⁸ The mother, or other trusted adult, places her mouth over the child’s open mouth, forming a firm seal as if about to perform mouth-to-mouth resuscitation. While occluding the unaffected nostril with a finger, the adult then blows until they feel the resistance caused by closure of the child’s glottis, at which point the adult gives a sharp exhalation to deliver a short puff of air into the child’s mouth. This puff of air passes through the nasopharynx, out through the unoccluded nostril and, if successful, results in the expulsion of the foreign body. The procedure is fully explained to the adult before starting, and the child is told that the parent will give him or her a “big kiss” so that minimal distress is caused to the child. The procedure can be repeated a number of times if not initially successful. A modified mother’s kiss technique has been described,⁹ which involves the adult blowing into a straw in the child’s mouth. We did not include this technique in our review.Although the mother’s kiss technique has been sporadically mentioned in the literature in case reports and case series, it has yet to gain widespread acceptance. It is not a suitable intervention for evaluation using a randomized controlled trial, because there is no appropriate control group: nontreatment is unacceptable, and there is no gold standard for comparison.Randomized controlled trials are considered to be the best trial design, but some treatments result in a dramatic effect that may not require randomized trials.¹⁰ The mother’s kiss technique falls into this category, because the foreign body will not usually move without intervention. Hence, case reports are sufficient to show that the technique sometimes works. However, a systematic review is needed to clarify how often it works and under what circumstances.We sought to examine the existing evidence for the efficacy and safety of the mother’s kiss technique, to help clinicians understand this evidence and to confirm or refute the appropriateness of current practice.Although systematic reviews of randomized controlled clinical trials are now common, it is rare to see a report of a systematic review of case reports or case series, and the methods for performing such a review are less clearly defined and tested. The principal elements of a systematic review are the location, appraisal and synthesis of individual studies; however, there are pitfalls to traditional systematic reviews of clinical trials that can introduce bias and inaccuracy in the results, which must be avoided. For this systematic review of case reports and case series, we were ever mindful of the rationale behind the stages in systematic reviews of clinical trials and endeavoured to apply the same principles to reduce bias and improve accuracy.     

Influence of Cholesterol and ��-Sitosterol on the Structure of EYPC Bilayers

The influence of cholesterol and β-sitosterol on egg yolk phosphatidylcholine (EYPC) bilayers is compared. Different interactions of these sterols with EYPC bilayers were observed using X-ray diffraction. Cholesterol was miscible with EYPC in the studied concentration range (0-50 mol%), but crystallization of β-sitosterol in EYPC bilayers was observed at X ≥ 41 mol% as detected by X-ray diffraction. Moreover, the repeat distance (d) of the lamellar phase was similar upon addition of the two sterols up to mole fraction 17%, while for X ≥ 17 mol% it became higher in the presence of β-sitosterol compared to cholesterol. SANS data on suspensions of unilamellar vesicles showed that both cholesterol and β-sitosterol similarly increase the EYPC bilayer thickness. Cholesterol in amounts above 33 mol% decreased the interlamellar water layer thickness, probably due to "stiffening" of the bilayer. This effect was not manifested by β-sitosterol, in particular due to the lower solubility of β-sitosterol in EYPC bilayers. Applying the formalism of partial molecular areas, it is shown that the condensing effect of both sterols on the EYPC area at the lipid-water interface is small, if any. The parameters of ESR spectra of spin labels localized in different regions of the EYPC bilayer did not reveal any differences between the effects of cholesterol and β-sitosterol in the range of full miscibility.     

The Cell Wall of the Arabidopsis Pollen Tube��Spatial Distribution, Recycling, and Network Formation of Polysaccharides

The pollen tube is a cellular protuberance formed by the pollen grain, or male gametophyte, in flowering plants. Its principal metabolic activity is the synthesis and assembly of cell wall material, which must be precisely coordinated to sustain the characteristic rapid growth rate and to ensure geometrically correct and efficient cellular morphogenesis. Unlike other model species, the cell wall of the Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) pollen tube has not been described in detail. We used immunohistochemistry and quantitative image analysis to provide a detailed profile of the spatial distribution of the major cell wall polymers composing the Arabidopsis pollen tube cell wall. Comparison with predictions made by a mechanical model for pollen tube growth revealed the importance of pectin deesterification in determining the cell diameter. Scanning electron microscopy demonstrated that cellulose microfibrils are oriented in near longitudinal orientation in the Arabidopsis pollen tube cell wall, consistent with a linear arrangement of cellulose synthase CESA6 in the plasma membrane. The cellulose label was also found inside cytoplasmic vesicles and might originate from an early activation of cellulose synthases prior to their insertion into the plasma membrane or from recycling of short cellulose polymers by endocytosis. A series of strategic enzymatic treatments also suggests that pectins, cellulose, and callose are highly cross linked to each other.Upon contact with the stigma, the pollen grain swells through water uptake and develops a cellular protrusion, the pollen tube. During its growth in planta, the pollen tube invades the transmitting tissue of the pistil and finds its way to the ovary to deliver the male gametes for double fertilization to happen (Heslop-Harrison, 1987). Depending on the species, pollen tubes can grow extremely rapidly both in planta and in in vitro conditions. To fulfill its biological function, the pollen tube has to (1) adhere to and invade transmitting tissues (Hill and Lord, 1987; Lennon et al., 1998), (2) provide physical protection to the sperm cells, and (3) control its own shape and invasive behavior (Parre and Geitmann, 2005b; Geitmann and Steer, 2006). For all of these functions, the pollen tube cell wall plays an important regulatory and structural role. Although the pollen tube does not form a conventional secondary cell wall layer, its wall is assembled in two phases. The “primary layer” is mainly formed of pectins and other matrix components secreted at the apical end of the cell. The “secondary layer” is assembled by the deposition of callose in more distal regions of the cell (Heslop-Harrison, 1987). Depending on the species, cellulose microfibrils have been found to be associated either with the outer pectic or with the inner callosic layer. Unlike most other plant cells, cellulose is not very abundant representing only 10% of total neutral polysaccharides in Nicotiana alata pollen tubes, whereas callose accounts for more than 80% in this species (Schlüpmann et al., 1994).The biochemical composition of the pollen tube cell wall has been well characterized in many species such as Lilium longiflorum (Lancelle and Hepler, 1992; Jauh and Lord, 1996), tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum; Kroh and Knuiman, 1982; Geitmann et al., 1995; Ferguson et al., 1998; Derksen et al., 2011), Petunia hybrida (Derksen et al., 1999), Pinus sylvestris (Derksen et al., 1999), and Solanum chacoense (Parre and Geitmann, 2005a). But for Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana), the model for plant molecular biology studies (Arabidopsis Genome Initiative, 2000), there is a striking lack of quantitative information concerning the composition of the pollen tube cell wall as well as the spatial distribution of its components. This is all the more surprising because numerous mutants defective in enzymes involved in cell wall synthesis exhibit a pollen tube phenotype (for example, Jiang et al., 2005; Nishikawa et al., 2005; Wang et al., 2011). Two studies have characterized the Arabidopsis pollen germinating in vitro (Derksen et al., 2002) and in vivo (Lennon and Lord, 2000), but both are qualitative rather than quantitative. A biochemical study by Dardelle and coworkers investigated the cell wall sugar composition in a more quantitative way but does not provide any detailed spatial information (Dardelle et al., 2010; Lehner et al., 2010). This lack of information is not surprising given that until recently Arabidopsis pollen was known to be rather challenging to germinate reproducibly in vitro and more difficult to manipulate than the pollen of many other plant species (Bou Daher et al., 2009). With the publication of optimized methods for in vitro germination (Boavida and McCormick, 2007; Bou Daher et al., 2009), it has become much more feasible to germinate healthy-looking Arabidopsis pollen tubes in vitro in a highly reproducible way.The precisely controlled spatial distribution of biochemical components in the pollen tube cell wall is crucial for shape generation and maintenance of this perfectly cylindrical cell (Geitmann and Parre, 2004; Aouar et al., 2010; Fayant et al., 2010; Geitmann, 2010). The pollen tube, therefore, represents an ideal model system to study the link between intracellular signaling, biochemistry, cell mechanical properties, and morphogenesis in plant cells. Because of its typically fast growth rates, it responds quickly to any environmental triggers such as pharmacological, hormone, or enzymatic treatments. Adding Arabidopsis to the group of commonly studied pollen tube species is particularly timely, because one-third of the approximately 800 cell wall synthesis genes identified in this species are expressed in or are specific to its pollen (Pina et al., 2005). Therefore, the Arabidopsis pollen tube has become a valuable system for cell wall studies, especially with the increasing availability of cell wall mutant lines (Liepman et al., 2010).Here we describe the biochemical composition of the Arabidopsis pollen tube cell wall grown in in vitro conditions using immunocytochemical labeling coupled with epifluorescence and electron microscopic techniques. Rather than relying on imaging alone, we developed a quantitative strategy to assess the precise spatial distribution of cell wall components. This quantitative approach will provide an important tool and baseline dataset for the investigation of mutant phenotypes and for the interpretation of pharmacological studies. Furthermore, we used selective and strategically combined enzymatic digestions to determine the degree of connectivity between the individual types of cell wall polysaccharide networks.     

Integrins ��2��1 and ��11��1 regulate the survival of mesenchymal stem cells on collagen I

Although mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are the natural source for bone regeneration, the exact mechanisms governing MSC crosstalk with collagen I have not yet been uncovered. Cell adhesion to collagen I is mostly mediated by three integrin receptors – α1β1, α2β1 and α11β1. Using human MSC (hMSC), we show that α11 subunit exhibited the highest basal expression levels but on osteogenic stimulation, both α2 and α11 integrins were significantly upregulated. To elucidate the possible roles of collagen-binding integrins, we applied short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated knockdown in hMSC and found that α2 or α11 deficiency, but not α1, results in a tremendous reduction of hMSC numbers owing to mitochondrial leakage accompanied by Bcl-2-associated X protein upregulation. In order to clarify the signaling conveyed by the collagen-binding integrins in hMSC, we analyzed the activation of focal adhesion kinase, extracellular signal-regulated protein kinase and serine/threonine protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) kinases and detected significantly reduced Akt phosphorylation only in α2- and α11-shRNA hMSC. Finally, experiments with hMSC from osteoporotic patients revealed a significant downregulation of α2 integrin concomitant with an augmented mitochondrial permeability. In conclusion, our study describes for the first time that disturbance of α2β1- or α11β1-mediated interactions to collagen I results in the cell death of MSCs and urges for further investigations examining the impact of MSCs in bone conditions with abnormal collagen I.     

Structural Relaxation During Drying and Rehydration of Food Materials��the Water Effect and the Origin of Hysteresis

The state of water in foodstuffs is a guiding principle in food design, and the equilibrium concept of water activity (Aw) is ubiquitous. It is regarded as a primary variable or “hurdle” in preservation technology, and a key variable influencing chemical reaction during storage. However, the amount of water in any system differs as function of water activity depending whether it is determined by water sorption or desorption. Even though this hysteresis behaviour has already been described in the literature, no physical interpretation of its origin has yet been proposed with respect to detailed molecular organisation. This work shows, for two different food powders, gluten and a milk-based product that the hysteresis disappears when either go through their glass transition. A more complete DSC analysis for gluten during different sorption/desorption cycles demonstrates that the hysteresis is dependent on the ageing of the material, which evolves in the glassy state and is induced by structural relaxation.     

Hsp70 Interacts with the Retroviral Restriction Factor TRIM5�� and Assists the Folding of TRIM5��

Tripartite motif (TRIM) protein TRIM5α has been shown to restrict human immunodeficiency virus, type 1 infection in Old World monkey cells at the early post-entry step by poorly understood mechanisms. Currently, the physiological function of TRIM5α is not known. In this study, we showed that transiently overexpressed TRIM5α causes a morphological change in HEK293T cells. A proteomics analysis of the protein complexes that were pulled down with hemagglutinin-tagged TRIM5α suggested that the heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) may serve as a TRIM5α-binding partner. The interaction between Hsp70 and TRIM5α was confirmed by co-localization and co-immunoprecipitation assays. Co-expression of Hsp70 reversed the TRIM5α-induced morphological change in HEK293T cells. Another heat shock protein Hsc70 also bound to TRIM5α, but unlike Hsp70, Hsc70 was not able to reverse the TRIM5α-induced morphological change, suggesting that Hsp70 specifically reverses the morphological change caused by TRIM5α. Studies using a series of TRIM5α deletion mutants demonstrate that, although the PRYSPRY domain is critical for binding to Hsp70, the entire TRIM5α structure is necessary to induce the morphological change of cells. When the ATPase domain of Hsp70 was mutated, the mutated Hsp70 could not counteract the morphological change induced by TRIM5α, indicating that the catalytic activity of Hsp70 protein is important for this function. Co-expression of Hsp70 elevated the levels of TRIM5α in the detergent-soluble fraction with a concomitant decrease in the detergent-insoluble fraction. Together these results suggest that Hsp70 plays critical roles in the cellular management against the TRIM5α-induced cellular insults.     

Analysis of the ��shelter tree-effect�� of natural and exotic forest canopies on the growth of young Podocarpus falcatus trees in southern Ethiopia

Plantations of exotic trees on areas where tropical forest has been clear-felled have been reported to facilitate regrowth of indigenous tree species. This so-called nurse- or shelter tree effect was investigated in a montane semihumid site in southern Ethiopia where plantations of Pinus patula and Eucalyptus saligna grow in close vicinity to the natural Podocarpus falcatus mixed forest. Physiological performance of P. falcatus saplings growing in the exotic and the natural forests was investigated over the year. Compared with the natural forest, photosynthetic carbon gain and growth of the saplings were significantly enhanced under Pinus patula while likewise retarded under Eucalyptus saligna. Diverging effects of the differently dense shelter canopies on the saplings could be traced to differences in the sub-canopy microclimates and particularly to the intensities and temporal distribution of photosynthetic active radiation (PAR). Moisture also played an important role for photosynthetic carbon gain: while the morning patterns of CO₂ uptake were significantly correlated with the patterns of sunflecks, stomatal conductance was the determinant factor in the afternoon. Analysis of the photosynthetic efficiency of sunflecks revealed a lower quantum yield than the basic diffuse PAR intensity. Compared with a theoretically even distribution of the daily PAR, CO₂ uptake under the real light climate was 70% under Pinus and in the natural forest, and 59% under Eucalyptus. Relating growth rates of Podocarpus saplings to photosynthesis the microclimate under Pinus was 2.5 times as effective as that in the natural forest and five times more effective than under Eucalyptus.     

SDF2L1, a Component of the Endoplasmic Reticulum Chaperone Complex, Differentially Interacts with ��-, ��-, and ��-Defensin Propeptides

Mammalian defensins are cationic antimicrobial peptides that play a central role in host innate immunity and as regulators of acquired immunity. In animals, three structural defensin subfamilies, designated as α, β, and θ, have been characterized, each possessing a distinctive tridisulfide motif. Mature α- and β-defensins are produced by simple proteolytic processing of their prepropeptide precursors. In contrast, the macrocyclic θ-defensins are formed by the head-to-tail splicing of nonapeptides excised from a pair of prepropeptide precursors. Thus, elucidation of the θ-defensin biosynthetic pathway provides an opportunity to identify novel factors involved in this unique process. We incorporated the θ-defensin precursor, proRTD1a, into a bait construct for a yeast two-hybrid screen that identified rhesus macaque stromal cell-derived factor 2-like protein 1 (SDF2L1), as an interactor. SDF2L1 is a component of the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) chaperone complex, which we found to also interact with α- and β-defensins. However, analysis of the SDF2L1 domain requirements for binding of representative α-, β-, and θ-defensins revealed that α- and β-defensins bind SDF2L1 similarly, but differently from the interactions that mediate binding of SDF2L1 to pro-θ-defensins. Thus, SDF2L1 is a factor involved in processing and/or sorting of all three defensin subfamilies.Mammalian defensins are tridisulfide-containing antimicrobial peptides that contribute to innate immunity in all species studied to date. Defensins are comprised of three structural subfamilies: the α-, β-, and θ-defensins (1). α- and β-Defensins are peptides of about 29–45-amino acid residues with similar three-dimensional structures. Despite their similar tertiary conformations, the disulfide motifs of α- and β-defensins differ. Expression of human α-defensins is tissue-specific. Four myeloid α-defensins (HNP1–4) are expressed predominantly by neutrophils and monocytes wherein they are packaged in granules, while two enteric α-defensins (HD-5 and HD-6) are expressed at high levels in Paneth cells of the small intestine. Myeloid α-defensins constitute about 5% of the protein mass of human neutrophils. HNPs are discharged into the phagosome during phagocytic ingestion of microbial particles. HD-5 and HD-6 are produced and stored as propeptides in Paneth cell granules and are processed extracellularly by intestinal trypsin (2). β-Defensins are produced primarily by various epithelia (e.g. skin, urogenital tract, airway) and are secreted by the producing cells in their mature forms. In contrast to pro-α-defensins, which contain a conserved prosegment of ∼40 amino acids, the prosegments in β-defensins vary in length and sequence. θ-Defensins are found only in Old World monkeys and orangutans and are the only known circular peptides in animals. These 18-residue macrocyclic peptides are formed by ligation of two nonamer sequences excised from two precursor polypeptides, which are truncated versions of ancestral α-defensins. Like myeloid α-defensins, θ-defensins are stored primarily in neutrophil and monocyte granules (3).Numerous laboratories have demonstrated that the antimicrobial properties of defensins derive from their ability to bind and disrupt target cell membranes (4), and studies have shown defensins to be active against Gram-positive and -negative bacteria (5), viruses (6–9), fungi (10, 11), and parasites such as Giardia lamblia (12). Defensins also play a regulatory role in acquired immunity as they are known to chemoattract T lymphocytes, monocytes, and immature dendritic cells (13, 14), act as adjuvants, stimulate B cell responses, and up-regulate proliferation and cytokine production by spleen cells and T helper cells (15, 16).Defensins are produced as pre-propeptides and undergo post-translational processing to form the mature peptides. While much has been learned about regulation of defensin expression, little is known about the factors involved in their biosynthesis. Valore and Ganz (17) investigated the processing of defensins in cultured cells and demonstrated that maturation of HNPs occurs through two proteolytic steps that lead to formation of mature α-defensins, but the proteases involved have yet to be identified. Moreover, there are virtually no published data regarding endoplasmic reticulum (ER)² factors that are responsible for the folding, processing, and sorting steps necessary for defensin maturation and secretion or trafficking to the proper subcellular compartment. It is likely that several chaperones, proteases, and protein-disulfide isomerase (PDI) family proteins are involved. Consistent with this possibility, Gruber et al. (18) recently demonstrated the role of a PDI in biosynthesis of cyclotides, small ∼30-residue macrocyclic peptides produced by plants.The primary structures of α- and θ-defensin precursors are closely related. We therefore undertook studies to identify proteins that interact with representative propeptides of each defensin subfamily with the goal of determining common and unique processes that regulate biosynthesis of α- and θ-defensins. We used two-hybrid analysis to first identify interactors of the θ-defensin precursor, proRTD1a. As described, we identified SDF2L1, a component of the ER-chaperone complex as an interactor, and showed that it also specifically interacts with α- and β-defensins. This suggests that SDF2L1 is involved in the maturation/trafficking of defensins at a step common to all three subfamilies of mammalian defensins.