Synthesis and Application of C2 and C3 Symmetric (R)‐Phenylglycinol‐Derived Chiral Stationary Phases

A C3 symmetric (R)‐phenylglycinol N‐1,3,5‐benzenetricarboxylic acid‐derived chiral stationary phase (CSP) and three C2 symmetric (R)‐phenylglycinol CSPs were newly synthesized using o‐, m‐, and p‐phthaloyl dichlorides. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. These CSPs were used to compare the resolution of 25 chiral samples using a previously reported 3,5‐dinitrobenzoyl (R)‐phenylglycinol‐derived CSP. Even though all CSPs have the same chiral moiety, the C3 symmetric CSP showed the best resolution. Chirality 28:186–191, 2016.© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Chiral separation on various modified amino alcohol‐derived HPLC chiral stationary phases

3,5‐Dinitrobenzoyl chloride was previously used for the preparation of (R)‐phenylglycinol‐ and (S)‐leucinol‐derived chiral stationary phases. In this study, 3,5‐bis(trifluoromethyl)benzoyl chloride, 2‐furoyl chloride, 2‐theonyl chloride, 10,11‐dihydro‐5H‐dibenzo[b,f]azepine‐5‐carbonyl chloride, diphenylcarbamoyl chloride, and 1‐adamantanecarbonyl chloride were used to prepare six new phenylglycinol‐derived chiral stationary phases (CSPs) and five new leucinol‐derived CSPs. Using these 11 CSPs, chiral separation of nine π‐acidic amino acid derivatives and five π‐basic compounds was performed, and the separation results were compared. An adamantyl‐derived CSP showed good separation. Chirality 28:276–281, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Synthesis of dendrimer‐type chiral stationary phases based on the selector of (1S,2R)‐(+)‐2‐Amino‐1,2‐diphenylethanol derivate and their enantioseparation evaluation by HPLC

In our recent work, a series of dendritic chiral stationary phases (CSPs) were synthesized, in which the chiral selector was L‐2‐(p‐toluenesulfonamido)‐3‐phenylpropionyl chloride (selector I), and the CSP derived from three‐generation dendrimer showed the best separation ability. To further investigate the influence of the structures of dendrimer and chiral selector on enantioseparation ability, in this work, another series CSPs ( CSPs 1‐4 ) were prepared by immobilizing (1S,2R)‐1,2‐diphenyl‐2‐(3‐phenylureido)ethyl 4‐isocyanatophenylcarbamate (selector II) on one‐ to four‐generation dendrimers that were prepared in previous work. CSPs 1 and 4 demonstrated the equivalent enantioseparation ability. CSPs 2 and 3 showed the best and poorest enantioseparation ability respectively. Basically, these two series of CSPs exhibited the equivalent enantioseparation ability although the chiral selectors were different. Considering the enantioseparation ability of the CSP derived from aminated silica gel and selector II is much better than that of the one derived from aminated silica gel and selector I, it is believed that the dendrimer conformation essentially impacts enantioseparation. Chirality, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Synthesis and Enantioseparation Ability of Xylan Bisphenylcarbamate Derivatives as Chiral Stationary Phases in HPLC

Ten novel xylan bisphenylcarbamate derivatives bearing meta‐ and para‐substituents on their phenyl groups were synthesized and their chiral recognition abilities were evaluated as the chiral stationary phases (CSPs) for high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) after coating them on macroporous silica. The chiral recognition abilities of these CSPs depended on the nature, position, and number of the substituents on the phenyl moieties. The introduction of an electron‐donating group was more attractive than an electron‐withdrawing group to improve the chiral recognition ability of the xylan phenylcarbamate derivatives. Among the CSPs discussed in this study, xylan bis(3,5‐dimethylphenylcarbamate)‐based CSP seems to possess the highest resolving power for many racemates, and the meta‐substituted CSPs showed relatively better chiral recognition than the para‐substituted ones. For some racemates, the xylan bis(3,5‐dimethylphenylcarbamate) derivative exhibited higher enantioselectivity than the CSP based on cellulose tris(3,5‐dimethylphenylcarbamate). Chirality 27:518–522, 2015 © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A chiral stationary phase which affords unusually high levels of enantioselectivity

A chiral stationary phase (CSP) derived from N-(1-naphthyl) leucine has been prepared. This CSP is conceptually similar to the CSP derived from N-(2-naphthyl)alanine and was expected to separate the enantiomers of the same clientele of analytes as does the latter. The magnitudes of the separation factors observed on the two CSPs may differ markedly for a given analyte, the new CSP often affording much greater enantioselectivity.     

Steric hindrance influence on the enantiorecognition ability of tyrosine-derived chiral stationary phases

Four chiral stationary phases (CSPs) derived from N-(3,5-dinitrobenzoyl)tyrosine have been synthesized. They differ by the substituent nature (methyl, ethyl, isopropyl, tert-butyl) of the aliphatic amide function. The enantiorecognition ability of these CSPs was evaluated with 10 racemates. For the majority of them, the stereoselectivity increases with the steric hindrance of the substituent. The chiral selector enantiomeric separation on the resulting CSPs has evidenced a reversal of elution order only for CS 4 on CSP 4 (tert-butyl substituent), suggesting a change in its conformation.     

Liquid Chromatographic Resolution of Mexiletine and Its Analogs on Crown Ether‐Based Chiral Stationary Phases

Mexiletine, an effective class IB antiarrhythmic agent, and its analogs were resolved on three different crown ether‐based chiral stationary phases (CSPs), one (CSP 1 ) of which is based on (+)‐(18‐crown‐6)‐2,3,11,12‐tetracarboxylic acid and the other two (CSP 2 and CSP 3 ) are based on (3,3’‐diphenyl‐1,1’‐binaphthyl)‐20‐crown‐6. Mexiletine was resolved with a resolution (R_S) of greater than 1.00 on CSP 1 and CSP 3 containing residual silanol group‐protecting n‐octyl groups on the silica surface, but with a resolution (R_S) of less than 1.00 on CSP 2 . The chromatographic behaviors for the resolution of mexiletine analogs containing a substituted phenyl group at the chiral center on the three CSPs were quite dependent on the phenoxy group of analytes. Namely, mexiletine analogs containing 2,6‐dimethylphenoxy, 3,4‐dimethylphenoxy, 3‐methylphenoxy, 4‐methylphenoxy, and a simple phenoxy group were resolved very well on the three CSPs even though the chiral recognition efficiencies vary with the CSPs. However, mexiletine analogs containing 2‐methylphenoxy group were not resolved at all or only slightly resolved. Among the three CSPs, CSP 3 was found to show the highest chiral recognition efficiencies for the resolution of mexiletine and its analogs, especially in terms of resolution (R_S). Chirality 26:272–278, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Comparative studies between covalently immobilized and coated chiral stationary phases based on polysaccharide derivatives for enantiomer separation of N‐protected α‐amino acids and their ester derivatives

Liquid chromatographic enantiomer separation of several N‐benzyloxycarbonyl (CBZ) and N‐tert‐butoxycarbonyl (BOC) α‐amino acids and their corresponding ethyl esters was performed on covalently immobilized chiral stationary phases (CSPs) (Chiralpak IA and Chiralpak IB) and coated‐type CSPs (Chiralpak AD and Chiralcel OD) based on polysaccharide derivatives. The solvent versatility of the covalently immobilized CSPs in enantiomer separation of N‐CBZ and BOC‐α‐amino acids and their ester derivatives was shown and the chromatographic parameters of their enantioselectivities and resolution factors were greatly influenced by the nature of the mobile phase. In general, standard mobile phases using 2‐propanol and hexane on Chiralpak IA showed fairly good enantioselectivities for resolution of N‐CBZ and BOC‐α‐amino acids and their esters. However, 50% MTBE/hexane (v/v) for resolution of N‐CBZ‐α‐amino acids ethyl esters and 20% THF/hexane (v/v) for resolution of N‐BOC‐α‐amino acids ethyl esters afforded the greatest enantioselectivities on Chiralpak IA. Also, liquid chromatographic comparisons of the enantiomer resolution of these analytes were made on amylose tris(3,5‐dimethylphenylcarbamate)‐derived CSPs (Chiralpak IA and Chiralpak AD) and cellulose tris(3,5‐dimethylphenylcarbamate)‐derived CSPs (Chiralpak IB and Chiralcel OD). Chiralpak AD and/or Chiralcel OD showed the highest enantioselectivities for resolution of N‐CBZ‐α‐amino acids and esters, while Chiralpak AD or Chiralpak IA showed the highest resolution of N‐BOC‐α‐amino acids and esters. Chirality 2009. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Determination of the enantiomeric purity of the selective dopamine transporter inhibitor (+)‐R,R‐4‐(2‐benzhydryloxyethyl)‐1‐(4‐fluorobenzyl)piperidin‐3‐ol

(+)‐R ,R ‐D‐84 ((+)‐R ,R ‐4‐(2‐benzhydryloxyethyl)‐1‐(4‐fluorobenzyl)piperidin‐3‐ol) is a promising pharmacological tool for the dopamine transporter (DAT), due to its high affinity and selectivity for this target. In this study, an analytical method to ascertain the enantiomeric purity of this compound was established. For this purpose, a high‐performance liquid chromatographic (HPLC) method, based on a cellulose derived chiral stationary phase (CSP) was developed. The method was characterized concerning its specificity, linearity, and range. It was shown that the method is suitable to determine an enantiomeric excess of up to 99.8%. With only a few adjustments, this analytical CSP‐HPLC method is also well suited to separate (+)‐R ,R ‐D‐84 from its enantiomer in a semipreparative scale.     

Preparation and enantioseparation of a mixed selector chiral stationary phase derived from benzoylated tartaric acid and 1,2‐diphenylethylenediamine

L ‐Dibenzoyl tartaric acid was mono‐esterified with benzyl alcohol, and then chlorinated with SOCl₂ to give (2S,3S)‐1‐(benzyloxy)‐4‐chloro‐1,4‐dioxobutane‐2,3‐diyl dibenzoate (Selector 1 ). (1R,2R)‐1,2‐Diphenylethylenediamine was mono‐functionalized with phenyl isocyanate and phenylene diisocyanate in sequence to give (1R,2R)‐1,2‐diphenyl‐2‐(3‐phenylureido)ethyl 4‐ isocyanatophenylurea (Selector 2 ). Two brush‐type chiral stationary phases (CSPs) of single selector were prepared by separately immobilizing selectors 1 and 2 on aminated silica gel. Selectors 1 and 2 were simultaneously immobilized on aminated silica gel to give a mixed selector CSP. The enantioseparation ability of these CSPs was studied. The CSP of selector 1 has strongest separation ability, while the enantioseparation ability of the mixed selector CSP is relatively lower. Chirality 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Enantioseparation of racemic 4-aryl-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-pyrimidones on chiral stationary phases based on 3,5-dimethylanilides of N-(4-alkylamino-3,5-dinitro)benzoyl L-alpha-amino acids

Three novel chiral packing materials for high-performance liquid chromatography were prepared by covalently binding of (2S)-N-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-2-[(4-chloro-3,5-dinitrophenyl)carbonylamino]propan-amide (7), (2S)-N-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-2-[(4-chloro-3,5-dinitrophenyl)carbonylamino]-4-methylpentanamide (8), and (2S)-N-(3,5-dimethylphenyl)-2-[(4-chloro-3,5-dinitrophenyl)carbonyl-amino]-2-phenylacetamide (9) to aminopropyl silica. The resulting chiral stationary phases (CSPs 1-3) proved effective for the resolution of racemic 4-aryl-3,4-dihydro-2(1H)-pyrimidone derivatives (TR 1-14). The mechanism of their enantioselection, supported by the elution order of (S)-TR 13 and (R)-TR 13 and molecular modeling of the complex of the slower running (S)-TR 13 with CSP 1 is discussed.     

Enantioresolution of Chiral Derivatives of Xanthones on (S,S)‐Whelk‐O1 and l‐Phenylglycine Stationary Phases and Chiral Recognition Mechanism by Docking Approach for (S,S)‐Whelk‐O1

The resolution of seven enantiomeric pairs of chiral derivatives of xanthones (CDXs) on (S,S)‐Whelk‐O1 and l ‐phenylglycine chiral stationary phases (CSPs) was systematically investigated using multimodal elution conditions (normal‐phase, polar‐organic, and reversed‐phase). The (S,S)‐Whelk‐O1 CSP, under polar‐organic conditions, demonstrated a very good power of resolution for the CDXs possessing an aromatic moiety linked to the stereogenic center with separation factor and resolution factor ranging from 1.91 to 7.55 and from 6.71 to 24.16, respectively. The chiral recognition mechanisms were also investigated for (S,S)‐Whelk‐O1 CSP by molecular docking technique. Data regarding the CSP–CDX molecular conformations and interactions were retrieved. These results were in accordance with the experimental chromatographic parameters regarding enantioselectivity and enantiomer elution order. The results of the present study fulfilled the initial objectives of enantioselective studies of CDXs and elucidation of intermolecular CSP–CDX interactions. Chirality 25:89–100, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Crystallographic studies for the chiral recognition of the novel chiral stationary phase derived from (+)‐(R)‐18‐crown‐6 tetracarboxylic acid

Chiral discrimination observed in high‐performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with the novel chiral stationary phase (CSP‐18C6I) derived from (+)‐(R)‐18‐crown‐6 tetracarboxylic acid [(+)‐18C6H₄] was investigated by X‐ray crystallographic analysis of the complex composed of the R‐enantiomer of 1‐(1‐naphthyl)ethylamine (1‐NEA) and (+)‐18C6H₄. Mixtures of 1‐NEA (the R‐ or S‐enantiomer) and (+)‐18C6H₄ were dissolved in methanol‐water (1:1) solution and allowed to stand for crystallization. The R‐enantiomer crystallized with (+)‐18C6H₄ as a co‐crystal, although the S‐enantiomer did not. This result was in good agreement with the enantiomer elution order of 1‐NEA in CSP‐18C6I. The apparent binding constants (K_a) of the enantiomers to the (+)‐18C6H₄ obtained from ¹H‐NMR experiments also supported the above‐mentioned result. The X‐ray crystal structure of the 1:1 complex of the R‐enantiomer and (+)‐18C6H₄ indicated the four sets of hydrogen bond association between the naphthylethylammonium cation and oxygen of polyether ring or carbonyl group of (+)‐18C6H₄. Chirality 11:173–178, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Enantioseparation of Four Organophosphonate Derivatives on N‐(3,5‐Dinitrobenzoyl)‐ l‐leucine–n‐Propylamide Stationary Phase by Molecular Modeling

Four groups of organophosphonate derivatives enantiomers were separated on N‐(3,5‐dinitrobenzoyl)‐S‐leucine chiral stationary phase. The three‐dimensional structures of the complexes between the single enantiotopic chiral compounds and chiral stationary phase have been studied using molecular model and molecular dynamics simulation. Detailed results regarding the conformation, auto‐docking, and thermodynamic estimation are presented. The elution order of the enantiomer could be determined from the energy. The predicted chiral discrimination was obtained by computational results. Chirality 25:101–106, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Enantiopure 4‐oxazolin‐2‐ones and 4‐methylene‐2‐oxazolidinones as chiral building blocks in a divergent asymmetric synthesis of heterocycles

Enantiopure 3‐((R)‐ and 3‐((S)‐1‐phenylethyl)‐4‐oxazoline‐2‐ones were evaluated as chiral building blocks for the divergent construction of heterocycles with stereogenic quaternary centers. The N‐(R)‐ or N‐(S)‐1‐phenylethyl group of these compounds proved to be an efficient chiral auxiliary for the asymmetric induction of the 4‐ and 5‐positions of the 4‐oxazolin‐2‐one ring through thermal and MW‐promoted nucleophilic conjugated addition to Michael acceptors and alkyl halides. The resulting adducts were transformed via a cascade process into fused six‐membered carbo‐ and heterocycles. The structure of the reaction products depended on the electrophiles and reaction conditions used. Alternative isomeric 4‐methylene‐2‐oxazolidinones served as chiral precursors for a versatile and divergent approach to highly substituted cyclic carbamates. DFT quantum calculations showed that the formation of bicyclic pyranyl compounds was generated by a diastereoselective concerted hetero‐Diels‐Alder cycloaddition.     

Development of HPLC Chiral Stationary Phases Based on (+)‐(18‐Crown‐6)‐2,3,11,12‐tetracarboxylic Acid and Their Applications

Crown ether‐based chiral stationary phases (CSPs) have been known to be useful for the resolution of racemic primary amino compounds. In particular, CSPs based on (+)‐(18‐crown‐6)‐2,3,11,12‐tetracarboxylic acid have been reported to be useful for the resolution of secondary amino compounds as well as primary amino compounds. In this article, the process of developing various CSPs based on (+)‐(18‐crown‐6)‐2,3,11,12‐tetracarboxylic acid to improve the chiral recognition efficiency and/or the stability of the CSPs and their applications to the resolution of various primary and nonprimary amino compounds are reviewed. Chirality 27:576–588, 2015. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Novel chiral stationary phases based on 3,5-dimethyl phenylcarbamoylated β-cyclodextrin combining cinchona alkaloid moiety

Novel chiral selectors based on 3,5-dimethyl phenylcarbamoylated β-cyclodextrin connecting quinine (QN) or quinidine (QD) moiety were synthesized and immobilized on silica gel. Their chromatographic performances were investigated by comparing to the 3,5-dimethyl phenylcarbamoylated β-cyclodextrin (β-CD) chiral stationary phase (CSP) and 9-O-(tert-butylcarbamoyl)-QN-based CSP (QN-AX). Fmoc-protected amino acids, chiral drug cloprostenol (which has been successfully employed in veterinary medicine), and neutral chiral analytes were evaluated on CSPs, and the results showed that the novel CSPs characterized as both enantioseparation capabilities of CD-based CSP and QN/QD-based CSPs have broader application range than β-CD-based CSP or QN/QD-based CSPs. It was found that QN/QD moieties play a dominant role in the overall enantioseparation process of Fmoc-amino acids accompanied by the synergistic effect of β-CD moiety, which lead to the different enantioseparation of β-CD-QN-based CSP and β-CD-QD-based CSP. Furthermore, new CSPs retain extraordinary enantioseparation of cyclodextrin-based CSP for some neutral analytes on normal phase and even exhibit better enantioseparation than the corresponding β-CD-based CSP for certain samples.     

New chiral stationary phases based on (R)‐1‐naphthylethylamine bound to 2,4,5,6‐tetrachloro‐1,3‐dicyanobenzene

Chiral functionalization of 2,4,5,6‐tetrachloro‐1,3‐dicyanobenzene (1) by regioselective nucleophilic substitution of one or two chlorine atoms by optically pure (R)‐(+)‐1‐naphthylethylamine (NEA), or by a glycine unit as a spacer to (R)‐NEA, enables the preparation of brush‐type chiral selectors (2, 3, 9, 13). By the introduction of the 3‐aminopropyltriethoxysilyl (APTES) group, reactive intermediates 4a/b, 5, 10a/b, and 14a/b are obtained ( a/b indicate a mixture of regioisomers with APTES in 6‐ and 2‐position). Binding of these to silica gel afforded four novel chiral stationary phases (CSPs) 6, 7, 15, and 16. HPLC columns containing CSPs with (R)‐NEA directly linked to polysubstituted aromatic ring (6, 7) are not very effective in resolution of most of the 23 racemic analytes, whereas the columns with distant π‐basic subunits (15, 16) exhibited higher resolving efficacy, in particular towards the isopropyl esters of racemic N‐3,5‐dinitrobenzoyl‐α‐amino acids. Effective resolution of test racemates reveals the importance of the presence of the hydrogen bond donor amido group and the distance between the persubstituted benzene ring in 1 and the π‐basic naphthalene ring of (R)‐NEA. Chirality 11:722–730, 1999. © 1999 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The comparison in enantioseparation ability of the chiral stationary phases with single and mixed selector--the selectors derived from two D-tartrates

(2S,3S)-2,3-Bis(3,5-dimethylphenylcarbonyloxy)-3-(benzyloxycarbonyl)-propanoic acid and (2S,3S)-2,3-bis(1-naphthalenecarbonyloxy)-3-(benzyloxycarbonyl)-propanoic acid were synthesized from D-tartaric acid. These two compounds were chlorinated to afford two chiral selectors for chiral stationary phases (CSPs). The selectors were separately immobilized on aminated silica gel to give two single selector CSPs; and were simultaneously immobilized to obtain a mixed selector CSP. Comparing to the single selector CSPs, the mixed selector CSP bears the enhanced enantioseparation ability, suggesting that the two selectors in the mixed selector CSP are consistent for chiral recognition in most mobile phase conditions.     

Enantioselective liquid‐liquid extraction of DL‐mandelic acid using chiral diphosphine ligands as extractants

In order to expand the application range of chiral diphosphine ligands, (S)‐BINAP, (S)‐SEGPHOS, and (S)‐MeO‐BIPHEP were employed as extractants to recognize DL‐mandelic acid. The results indicated that (S)‐SEGPHOS‐Cu exhibited considerable ability to recognize DL‐mandelic acid with operational enantioselectivity (α) of 2.677. The process of extraction of DL‐mandelic acid using (S)‐SEGPHOS‐Cu as extractant was systematically investigated. Performance factor (pf) was adopted to comprehensively evaluate the extraction. After optimization by response surface methodology (RSM), the optimal extraction condition is temperature of 5.5°C, (S)‐SEGPHOS‐Cu concentration of 3.0 mmol/L, and pH of 8.0. And the predicted and experimental maximum values of pf were 0.26374 and 0.26839, respectively.