Eotaxin and monocyte chemotactic protein-3 use different modes of action

Eotaxin selectively binds CC chemokine receptor (CCR) 3, whereas monocyte chemotactic protein (MCP)-3 binds CCR1, CCR2, and CCR3. To identify the functional determinants of the chemokines, we generated four reciprocal chimeric chemokines-M10E9, M22E21, E8M11, and E20M23-by shuffling the N-terminus and N-loop of eotaxin and MCP-3. M22E21 and E8M11, which shared the N-loop from MCP-3, bound to monocytes with high affinity, and activated monocytes. In contrast, M10E9 and E20M23, which lacked the N-loop, failed to bind and transduce monocyte responses, identifying the N-loop of MCP-3 as the selectivity determinant for CCR1/CCR2. A BIAcore assay with an N-terminal peptide of CCR3 (residues 1-35) revealed that all chimeras except E20M23 exhibited varying degrees of binding affinity with commensurate chemotaxis activity of eosinophils. Surprisingly, E20M23 could neither bind the CCR3 peptide nor activate eosinophils, despite having both N-terminal motifs from eotaxin. These results suggest that the two N-terminal motifs of eotaxin must cooperate with other regions to successfully bind and activate CCR3.     

Identification of surface residues of the monocyte chemotactic protein 1 that affect signaling through the receptor CCR2

The CC chemokine, monocyte chemotactic protein, 1 (MCP-1) functions as a major chemoattractant for T-cells and monocytes by interacting with the seven-transmembrane G protein-coupled receptor CCR2. To identify which residues of MCP-1 contribute to signaling though CCR2, we mutated all the surface-exposed residues to alanine and other amino acids and made some selective large changes at the amino terminus. We then characterized the impact of these mutations on three postreceptor pathways involving inhibition of cAMP synthesis, stimulation of cytosolic calcium influx, and chemotaxis. The results highlight several important features of the signaling process and the correlation between binding and signaling: The amino terminus of MCP-1 is essential as truncation of residues 2-8 ([1+9-76]hMCP-1) results in a protein that cannot stimulate chemotaxis. However, the exact peptide sequence may be unimportant as individual alanine mutations or simultaneous replacement of residues 3-6 with alanine had little effect. Y13 is also important and must be a large nonpolar residue for chemotaxis to occur. Interestingly, both Y13 and [1+9-76]hMCP-1 are high-affinity binders and thus affinity of these mutants is not correlated with ability to promote chemotaxis. For the other surface residues there is a strong correlation between binding affinity and agonist potency in all three signaling pathways. Perhaps the most interesting observation is that although Y13A and [1+9-76]hMCP are antagonists of chemotaxis, they are agonists of pathways involving inhibition of cAMP synthesis and, in the case of Y13A, calcium influx. These results demonstrate that these two well-known signaling events are not sufficient to drive chemotaxis. Furthermore, it suggests that specific molecular features of MCP-1 induce different conformations in CCR2 that are coupled to separate postreceptor pathways. Therefore, by judicious design of antagonists, it should be possible to trap CCR2 in conformational states that are unable to stimulate all of the pathways required for chemotaxis.     

Inhibition of the angiogenesis by the MCP-1 (monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) binding peptide

The CC chemokine, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), plays a crucial role in the initiation of atherosclerosis and has direct effects that promote angiogenesis. To develop a specific inhibitor for MCP-1-induced angiogenesis, we performed in vitro selection employing phage display random peptide libraries. Most of the selected peptides were found to be homologous to the second extracellular loops of CCR2 and CCR3. We synthesized the peptide encoding the homologous sequences of the receptors and tested its effect on the MCP-1 induced angiogenesis. Surface plasmon resonance measurements demonstrated specific binding of the peptide to MCP-1 but not to the other homologous protein, MCP-3. Flow cytometry revealed that the peptide inhibited the MCP-1 binding to THP-1 monocytes. Moreover, CAM and rat aortic ring assays showed that the peptide inhibited MCP-1 induced angiogenesis. Our observations indicate that the MCP-1-binding peptide exerts its anti-angiogenic effect by interfering with the interaction between MCP-1 and its receptor.     

Multiple charged and aromatic residues in CCR5 amino-terminal domain are involved in high affinity binding of both chemokines and HIV-1 Env protein

CCR5 is a functional receptor for MIP-1alpha, MIP-1beta, RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed), MCP-2, and MCP-4 and constitutes the main coreceptor for macrophage tropic human and simian immunodeficiency viruses. By using CCR5-CCR2b chimeras, we have shown previously that the second extracellular loop of CCR5 is the major determinant for chemokine binding specificity, whereas the amino-terminal domain plays a major role for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) and simian immunodeficiency virus coreceptor function. In the present work, by using a panel of truncation and alanine-scanning mutants, we investigated the role of specific residues in the CCR5 amino-terminal domain for chemokine binding, functional response to chemokines, HIV-1 gp120 binding, and coreceptor function. Truncation of the amino-terminal domain resulted in a progressive decrease of the binding affinity for chemokines, which correlated with a similar drop in functional responsiveness. Mutants lacking residues 2-13 exhibited fairly weak responses to high concentrations (500 nM) of RANTES or MIP-1beta. Truncated mutants also exhibited a reduction in the binding affinity for R5 Env proteins and coreceptor activity. Deletion of 4 or 12 residues resulted in a 50 or 80% decrease in coreceptor function, respectively. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis identified several charged and aromatic residues (Asp-2, Tyr-3, Tyr-10, Asp-11, and Glu-18) that played an important role in both chemokine and Env high affinity binding. The overlapping binding site of chemokines and gp120 on the CCR5 amino terminus, as well as the involvement of these residues in the epitopes of monoclonal antibodies, suggests that these regions are particularly exposed at the receptor surface.     

Rationally Evolving MCP-1/CCL2 into a Decoy Protein with Potent Anti-inflammatory Activity in Vivo

Leukocyte recruitment from the blood into injured tissues during inflammatory diseases is the result of sequential events involving chemokines binding to their GPC receptors as well as to their glycosaminoglycan (GAG) co-receptors. The induction and the crucial role of MCP-1/CCL2 in the course of diseases that feature monocyte-rich infiltrates have been validated in many animal models, and several MCP-1/CCL2 as well as CCR2 antagonists have since been generated. However, despite some of them being shown to be efficacious in a number of animal models, many failed in clinical trials, and therapeutically interfering with the activity of this chemokine is not yet possible. We have therefore generated novel MCP-1/CCL2 mutants with increased GAG binding affinity and knocked out CCR2 activity, which were designed to interrupt the MCP-1/CCL2-related signaling cascade. We provide evidence that our lead mutant MCP-1(Y13A/S21K/Q23R) exhibits a 4-fold higher affinity toward the natural MCP-1 GAG ligand heparan sulfate and that it shows a complete deficiency in activating CCR2 on THP-1 cells. Furthermore, a significantly longer residual time on GAG ligands was observed by surface plasmon resonance. Finally, we were able to show that MCP-1(Y13A/S21K/Q23R) had a mild ameliorating effect on experimental autoimmune uveitis and that a marginal effect on oral tolerance in the group co-fed with Met-MCP-1(Y13A/S21K/Q23R) plus immunogenic peptide PDSAg was observed. These results suggest that disrupting wild type chemokine-GAG interactions by a chemokine-based antagonist can result in anti-inflammatory activity that could have potential therapeutic implications.     

Role of the first extracellular loop in the functional activation of CCR2. The first extracellular loop contains distinct domains necessary for both agonist binding and transmembrane signaling.

The physiological cellular responses to monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1), a potent chemotactic and activating factor for mononuclear leukocytes, are mediated by specific binding to CCR2. The aim of this investigation is to identify receptor microdomains that are involved in high affinity agonist binding and receptor activation. The results from our functional studies in which we utilized neutralizing antisera against CCR2 are consistent with a multidomain binding model, previously proposed by others. The first extracellular loop was of particular interest, because in addition to a ligand-binding domain it contained also information for receptor activation, crucial for transmembrane signaling. Replacement of the first extracellular loop of CCR2 with the corresponding region of CCR1 decreased the MCP-1 binding affinity about 10-fold and prevented transmembrane signaling. A more detailed analysis by site-directed mutagenesis revealed that this receptor segment contains two distinct microdomains. The amino acid residues Asn(104) and Glu(105) are essential for high affinity agonist binding but are not involved in receptor activation. In contrast, the charged amino acid residue His(100) does not contribute to ligand binding but is vital for receptor activation and initiation of transmembrane signaling. We hypothesize that the interaction of agonist with this residue initiates the conformational switch that allows the formation of the functional CCR2-G protein complex.     

Conserved aromatic residues in the transmembrane region VI of the V1a vasopressin receptor differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.

Despite their opposite effects on signal transduction, the nonapeptide hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP) and its V1a receptor-selective cyclic peptide antagonist d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP display homologous primary structures, differing only at residues 1 and 2. These structural similarities led us to hypothesize that both ligands could interact with the same binding pocket in the V1a receptor. To determine receptor residues responsible for discriminating binding of agonist and antagonist ligands, we performed site-directed mutagenesis of conserved aromatic and hydrophilic residues as well as nonconserved residues, all located in the transmembrane binding pocket of the V1a receptor. Mutation of aromatic residues of transmembrane region VI (W304, F307, F308) reduced affinity for the d(CH2)5[Tyr(Me)2]AVP and markedly decreased affinity for the unrelated strongly hydrophobic V1a-selective nonpeptide antagonist SR 49059. Replacement of these aromatic residues had no effect on AVP binding, but increased AVP-induced coupling efficacy of the receptor for its G protein. Mutating hydrophilic residues Q108, K128 and Q185 in transmembrane regions II, III and IV, respectively, led to a decrease in affinity for both agonists and antagonists. Finally, the nonconserved residues T333 and A334 in transmembrane region VII, controlled the V1a/V2 binding selectivity for both nonpeptide and cyclic peptide antagonists. Thus, because conserved aromatic residues of the V1a receptor binding pocket seem essential for antagonists and do not contribute at all to the binding of agonists, we propose that these residues differentiate agonist vs. antagonist ligand binding.     

The viral CC chemokine-binding protein vCCI inhibits monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 activity by masking its CCR2B-binding site

Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is a chemotactic cytokine mainly acting on monocytes and T cells that elicits its biological effects by interacting with the seven-transmembrane helix receptor CCR2B. The vaccinia virus strain Lister and many other poxviruses express soluble proteins (vCCI) that bind MCP-1 and other CC chemokines and inhibit their function. In order to define the interaction site of MCP-1 with vCCI from vaccinia, surface exposed residues of MCP-1 were identified and mutated to alanine. The MCP-1 variants were expressed, purified, and their interaction with vCCI was characterized. The site on MCP-1 for vCCI binding is dominated by arginine 18 with important additional contributions from tyrosine 13 and arginine 24. These residues define a binding site that largely overlaps with the CCR2B receptor interaction site. The viral chemokine-binding protein vCCI thus inhibits the biological function of MCP-1 by directly masking its CCR2B receptor-binding site.     

The core domain of chemokines binds CCR5 extracellular domains while their amino terminus interacts with the transmembrane helix bundle

CCR5 is a functional receptor for various inflammatory CC-chemokines, including macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1alpha and RANTES (regulated on activation normal T cell expressed and secreted), and is the main coreceptor of human immunodeficiency viruses. The second extracellular loop and amino-terminal domain of CCR5 are critical for chemokine binding, whereas the transmembrane helix bundle is involved in receptor activation. Chemokine domains and residues important for CCR5 binding and/or activation have also been identified. However, the precise way by which chemokines interact with and activate CCR5 is presently unknown. In this study, we have compared the binding and functional properties of chemokine variants onto wild-type CCR5 and CCR5 point mutants. Several mutations in CCR5 extracellular domains (E172A, R168A, K191A, and D276A) strongly affected MIP-1alpha binding but had little effect on RANTES binding. However, a MIP/RANTES chimera, containing the MIP-1alpha N terminus and the RANTES core, bound to these mutants with an affinity similar to that of RANTES. Several CCR5 mutants affecting transmembrane helices 2 and 3 (L104F, L104F/F109H/F112Y, F85L/L104F) reduced the potency of MIP-1alpha by 10-100 fold with little effect on activation by RANTES. However, the MIP/RANTES chimera activated these mutants with a potency similar to that of MIP-1alpha. In contrast, LD78beta, a natural MIP-1alpha variant, which, like RANTES, contains a proline at position 2, activated these mutants as well as RANTES. Altogether, these results suggest that the core domains of MIP-1alpha and RANTES bind distinct residues in CCR5 extracellular domains, whereas the N terminus of chemokines mediates receptor activation by interacting with the transmembrane helix bundle.     

Mapping of MCP-1 functional domains by peptide analysis and site-directed mutagenesis

Monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) is a member of the β chemokine family which acts through specific seven transmembrane receptors to recruit monocytes, basophils, and T lymphocytes to sites of inflammation. To identify regions of the human MCP-1 protein which are important for its biological activity, we have synthesized domain-specific peptides and tested their ability to antagonize MCP-1 binding and chemotaxis in THP-1 cells. We have found that an intercysteine first loop peptide encompassing amino acids 13–35 inhibits MCP-1 binding and chemotactic activity, while peptides representing the amino-terminus (amino acids 1–10), second loop (amino acids 37–51), and carboxy-terminus (amino acids 56–71) of MCP-1 have no effect. In addition, we have found that cyclization of the first loop peptide by disulfide linkage and blocking the C-terminus of the peptide by amidation increases the activity of this peptide to block MCP-1 binding and chemotaxis. In order to specifically identify amino acid residues within the first loop that are crucial for MCP-1 functional activity, we have substituted alanine for tyrosine (Y13A) or arginine (R18A) in MCP-1 recombinant proteins. While baculovirus produced wild type and R18A MCP-1 proteins are indistinguishable in their ability to induce THP-1 chemotaxis and show modest effects in binding activity compared to commercially available recombinant MCP-1 protein, the Y13A point mutation causes a dramatic loss in function. The identification of functional domains of MCP-1 will assist in the design of MCP-1 receptor antagonists which may be clinically beneficial in a number of inflammatory diseases.     

Identification of the binding site for a novel class of CCR2b chemokine receptor antagonists: binding to a common chemokine receptor motif within the helical bundle

Monocyte chemoattracant-1 (MCP-1) stimulates leukocyte chemotaxis to inflammatory sites, such as rheumatoid arthritis, atherosclerosis, and asthma, by use of the MCP-1 receptor, CCR2, a member of the G-protein-coupled seven-transmembrane receptor superfamily. These studies identified a family of antagonists, spiropiperidines. One of the more potent compounds blocks MCP-1 binding to CCR2 with a K(d) of 60 nm, but it is unable to block binding to CXCR1, CCR1, or CCR3. These compounds were effective inhibitors of chemotaxis toward MCP-1 but were very poor inhibitors of CCR1-mediated chemotaxis. The compounds are effective blockers of MCP-1-driven inhibition of adenylate cyclase and MCP-1- and MCP-3-driven cytosolic calcium influx; the compounds are not agonists for these pathways. We showed that glutamate 291 (Glu(291)) of CCR2 is a critical residue for high affinity binding and that this residue contributes little to MCP-1 binding to CCR2. The basic nitrogen present in the spiropiperidine compounds may be the interaction partner for Glu(291), because the basicity of this nitrogen was essential for affinity; furthermore, a different class of antagonists, a class that does not have a basic nitrogen (2-carboxypyrroles), were not affected by mutations of Glu(291). In addition to the CCR2 receptor, spiropiperidine compounds have affinity for several biogenic amine receptors. Receptor models indicate that the acidic residue, Glu(291), from transmembrane-7 of CCR2 is in a position similar to the acidic residue contributed from transmembrane-3 of biogenic amine receptors, which may account for the shared affinity of spiropiperidines for these two receptor classes. The models suggest that the acid-base pair, Glu(291) to piperidine nitrogen, anchors the spiropiperidine compound within the transmembrane ovoid bundle. This binding site may overlap with the space required by MCP-1 during binding and signaling; thus the small molecule ligands act as antagonists. An acidic residue in transmembrane region 7 is found in most chemokine receptors and is rare in other serpentine receptors. The model of the binding site may suggest ways to make new small molecule chemokine receptor antagonists, and it may rationalize the design of more potent and selective antagonists.     

Critical role of a subdomain of the N-terminus of the V1a vasopressin receptor for binding agonists but not antagonists; functional rescue by the oxytocin receptor N-terminus

A fundamental issue in molecular pharmacology is to define how agonist:receptor interaction differs from that of antagonist:receptor. The V(1a) receptor (V(1a)R) is a member of a family of related G-protein-coupled receptors that are activated by the neurohypophysial peptide hormone arginine-vasopressin (AVP). Here we define a short subdomain of the N-terminus of the V(1a)R from Glu(37) to Asn(47) that is an absolute requirement for binding AVP and other agonists. In marked contrast to the situation for agonists, deleting this segment has little or no effect on the binding of either peptide or non-peptide antagonists. In addition, we established that this subdomain was crucial for receptor activation and second messenger generation. The oxytocin receptor (OTR) also binds AVP with high affinity but exhibits a different pharmacological profile to the V(1a)R. Substitution of the N-terminus of the V(1a)R with the corresponding sequence from the OTR generated a chimeric receptor (OTR(N)-V(1a)R). The presence of the OTR N-terminus recovered high affinity agonist binding such that the OTR(N)-V(1a)R possessed almost wild-type V(1a)R pharmacology and signaling. Consequently, a domain within the N-terminus is required for agonist binding but it does not provide the molecular discriminator for subtype-selective agonist recognition. Cotransfection and peptide mimetic studies demonstrated that this N-terminal subdomain had to be contiguous with the receptor polypeptide to be functional. This study establishes that a segment of the V(1a)R N-terminus has a pivotal role in the mechanism of agonist binding and provides molecular insight into key differences between the interaction of agonists and antagonists with a peptide receptor family.     

CCR11 is a functional receptor for the monocyte chemoattractant protein family of chemokines

Chemokines mediate their diverse activities through G protein-coupled receptors. The human homolog of the bovine orphan receptor PPR1 shares significant similarity to chemokine receptors. Transfection of this receptor into murine L1.2 cells resulted in responsiveness to monocyte chemoattractant protein (MCP)-4, MCP-2, and MCP-1 in chemotaxis assays. Binding studies with radiolabeled MCP-4 demonstrated a single high affinity binding site with an IC(50) of 0.14 nM. As shown by competition binding, other members of the MCP family also recognized this receptor. MCP-2 was the next most potent ligand, with an IC(50) of 0.45 nM. Surprisingly, eotaxin (IC(50) = 6.7 nM) and MCP-3 (IC(50) = 4.1 nM) bind with greater affinity than MCP-1 (IC(50) = 10.7 nM) but only act as agonists in chemotaxis assays at 100-fold higher concentrations. Because of high affinity binding and functional chemotactic responses, we have termed this receptor CCR11. The gene for CCR11 was localized to human chromosome 3q22, which is distinct from most CC chemokine receptor genes at 3p21. Northern blot hybridization was used to identify CCR11 expression in heart, small intestine, and lung. Thus CCR11 shares functional similarity to CCR2 because it recognizes members of the MCP family, but CCR11 has a distinct expression pattern.     

Turn structures in CGRP C-terminal analogues promote stable arrangements of key residue side chains.

The 37-amino acid calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a potent endogenous vasodilator thought to be implicated in the genesis of migraine attack. CGRP antagonists may thus have therapeutic value for the treatment of migraine. The CGRP C-terminally derived peptide [D(31),P(34),F(35)]CGRP(27-37)-NH(2) was recently identified as a high-affinity hCGRP(1) receptor selective antagonist. Reasonable CGRP(1) affinity has also been demonstrated for several related analogues, including [D(31),A(34),F(35)]CGRP(27-37)-NH(2). In the study presented here, conformational and structural features in CGRP(27-37)-NH(2) analogues that are important for hCGRP(1) receptor binding were explored. Structure-activity studies carried out on [D(31),P(34),F(35)]CGRP(27-37)-NH(2) resulted in [D(31),P(34),F(35)]CGRP(30-37)-NH(2), the shortest reported CGRP C-terminal peptide analogue exhibiting reasonable hCGRP(1) receptor affinity (K(i) = 29.6 nM). Further removal of T(30) from the peptide's N-terminus greatly reduced receptor affinity from the nanomolar to micromolar range. Additional residues deemed critical for hCGRP(1) receptor binding were identified from an alanine scan of [A(34),F(35)]CGRP(28-37)-NH(2) and included V(32) and F(37). Replacement of the C-terminal amide in this same peptide with a carboxyl, furthermore, resulted in a greater than 50-fold reduction in hCGRP(1) affinity, thus suggesting a direct role for the amide moiety in receptor binding. The conformational properties of two classes of CGRP(27-37)-NH(2) peptides, [D(31),X(34),F(35)]CGRP(27-37)-NH(2) (X is A or P), were examined by NMR spectroscopy and molecular modeling. A beta-turn centered on P(29) was a notable feature consistently observed among active peptides in both series. This turn led to exposure of the critical T(30) residue to the surrounding environment. Peptides in the A(34) series were additionally characterized by a stable C-terminal helical turn that resulted in the three important residues (T(30), V(32), and F(37)) adopting consistent interspatial positions with respect to one another. Peptides in the P(34) series were comparatively more flexible at the C-terminus, although a large proportion of the [D(31),P(34),F(35)]CGRP(27-37)-NH(2) calculated conformers contained a gamma-turn centered on P(34). These results collectively suggest that turn structures at both the C-terminus and N-terminus of CGRP(27-37)-NH(2) analogues may help to appropriately orient critical residues (T(30), V(32), and F(37)) for hCGRP(1) receptor binding.     

Site-directed mutagenesis of CCR2 identified amino acid residues in transmembrane helices 1, 2, and 7 important for MCP-1 binding and biological functions

Monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) binds its G-protein-coupled seven transmembrane (TM) receptor, CCR2B, and causes infiltration of monocytes/macrophages into areas of injury, infection or inflammation. To identify functionally important amino acid residues in CCR2B, we made specific mutations of nine residues selected on the basis of conservation in chemokine receptors and located TM1 (Tyr(49)), TM2 (Leu(95)), TM3 (Thr(117) and Tyr(120)), and TM7 (Ala(286), Thr(290), Glu(291), and His(297)) and in the extracellular loop 3 (Glu(278)). MCP-1 binding was drastically affected only by mutations in TM7. Reversing the charge at Glu(291) (E291K) and at His(297) (H297D) prevented MCP binding although substitution with Ala at either site had little effect, suggesting that Glu(291) and His(297) probably stabilize TM7 by their ionic interaction. E291A elicited normal Ca(2+) influx. H297A, Y49F in TM1 and L95A in TM2 that showed normal MCP-1 binding did not elicit Ca(2+) influx and elicited no adenylate cyclase inhibition at any MCP-1 concentration. MCP-1 treatment of HEK293 cells caused lamellipodia formation only when they expressed CCR2B. The mutants that showed no Ca(2+) influx and adenylate cyclase inhibition by MCP-1 treatment showed lamellipodia formation and chemotaxis. Our results show that induction of lamellipodia formation, but not Ca(2+) influx and adenylate cyclase inhibition, is necessary for chemotaxis.     

Androgen receptor ligand-binding domain interaction and nuclear receptor specificity of FXXLF and LXXLL motifs as determined by L/F swapping

The androgen receptor (AR) ligand-binding domain (LBD) binds FXXLF motifs, present in the AR N-terminal domain and AR-specific cofactors, and some LXXLL motifs of nuclear receptor coactivators. We demonstrated that in the context of the AR FXXLF motif many different amino acid residues at positions +2 and +3 are compatible with strong AR LBD interaction, although a preference for E at +2 and K or R at +3 was found. Pairwise systematic analysis of F/L swaps at +1 and +5 in FXXLF and LXXLL motifs showed: 1) F to L substitutions in natural FXXLF motifs abolished AR LBD interaction; 2) binding of interacting LXXLL motifs was unchanged or increased upon L to F substitutions; 3) certain noninteracting LXXLL motifs became strongly AR-interacting FXXLF motifs; whereas 4) other nonbinders remained unaffected by L to F substitutions. All FXXLF motifs, but not the corresponding LXXLL motifs, displayed a strong preference for AR LBD. Progesterone receptor LBD interacted with some FXXLF motifs, albeit always less efficiently than corresponding LXXLL motifs. AR LBD interaction of most FXXLF and LXXLL peptides depended on classical charge clamp residue K720, whereas E897 was less important. Other charged residues lining the AR coactivator-binding groove, K717 and R726, modulated optimal peptide binding. Interestingly, these four charged residues affected binding of individual peptides independent of an F or L at +1 and +5 in swap experiments. In conclusion, F residues determine strong and selective peptide interactions with AR. Sequences flanking the core motif determine the specific mode of FXXLF and LXXLL interactions.     

Identification of receptor binding and activation determinants in the N-terminal and N-loop regions of the CC chemokine eotaxin

Eotaxin is a CC chemokine that specifically activates the receptor CCR3 causing accumulation of eosinophils in allergic diseases and parasitic infections. Twelve amino acid residues in the N-terminal (residues 1-8) and N-loop (residues 11-20) regions of eotaxin have been individually mutated to alanine, and the ability of the mutants to bind and activate CCR3 has been determined in cell-based assays. The alanine mutants at positions Thr(7), Asn(12), Leu(13), and Leu(20) show near wild type binding affinity and activity. The mutants T8A, N15A, and K17A have near wild type binding affinity for CCR3 but reduced receptor activation. A third class of mutants, S4A, V5A, R16A, and I18A, display significantly perturbed binding affinity for CCR3 while retaining the ability to activate or partially activate the receptor. Finally, the mutant Phe(11) has little detectable activity and 20-fold reduced binding affinity relative to wild type eotaxin, the most dramatic effect observed in both assays but less dramatic than the effect of mutating the corresponding residue in some other chemokines. Taken together, the results indicate that residues contributing to receptor binding affinity and those required for triggering receptor activation are distributed throughout the N-terminal and N-loop regions. This conclusion is in contrast to the separation of binding and activation functions between N-loop and N-terminal regions, respectively, that has been observed previously for some other chemokines.     

Structural and functional analysis of the RANTES-glycosaminoglycans interactions

Chemokines mediate their biological activity through activation of G protein coupled receptors, but most chemokines, including RANTES, are also able to bind glycosaminoglycans (GAGs). Here, we have investigated, by site-directed mutagenesis and chemical acetylation, the role of RANTES basic residues in the interaction with GAGs using surface plasmon resonance kinetic analysis. Our results indicate that (i) RANTES exhibited selectivity in GAGs binding with highest affinity (K(d) = 32.1 nM) for heparin, (ii) RANTES uses the side chains of residues R44, K45, and R47 for heparin binding, and blocking these residues in combination abolished heparin binding. The biological relevance of RANTES-GAGs interaction was investigated in CHO-K1 cells expressing CCR5, CCR1, or CCR3 and the various GAGs that bind RANTES. Our results indicate that the heparin binding site, defined as the 40s loop, is only marginally involved in CCR5 binding and activation, but largely overlaps the CCR1 and CCR3 binding and activation domain in RANTES. In addition, enzymatic removal of cell surface GAGs by glycosidases did not affect CCR5 binding and Ca(2+) response. Furthermore, addition of soluble GAGs inhibited both CCR5 binding and functional response, with a rank of potency similar to that found in surface plasmon resonance experiments. Thus, cell surface GAGs is not a prerequisite for receptor binding or signaling, but soluble GAGs can inhibit the binding and the functional response of RANTES to CCR5 expressing cells. However, the marked selectivity of RANTES for different GAGs may serve, in vivo, to control the concentration of specific chemokines in inflammatory situations and locations.     

A 1H NMR study of a ternary peptide complex that mimics the interaction between troponin C and troponin I.

The troponin I peptide N alpha-acetyl TnI (104-115) amide (TnIp) represents the minimum sequence necessary for inhibition of actomyosin ATPase activity of skeletal muscle (Talbot, J.A. & Hodges, R.S. 1981, J. Biol. Chem. 256, 2798-3802; Van Eyk, J.E. & Hodges, R.S., 1988, J. Biol. Chem. 263, 1726-1732; Van Eyk, J.E., Kay, C.M., & Hodges, R.S., 1991, Biochemistry 30, 9974-9981). In this study, we have used 1H NMR spectroscopy to compare the binding of this inhibitory TnI peptide to a synthetic peptide heterodimer representing site III and site IV of the C-terminal domain of troponin C (TnC) and to calcium-saturated skeletal TnC. The residues whose 1H NMR chemical shifts are perturbed upon TnIp binding are the same in both the site III/site IV heterodimer and TnC. These residues include F102, I104, F112, I113, I121, I149, D150, F151, and F154, which are all found in the C-terminal domain hydrophobic pocket and antiparallel beta-sheet region of the synthetic site III/site IV heterodimer and of TnC. Further, the affinity of TnIp binding to the heterodimer (Kd = 192 +/- 37 microM) was found to be similar to TnIp binding to TnC (48 +/- 18 microM [Campbell, A.P., Cachia, P.J., & Sykes, B.D., 1991, Biochem. Cell Biol. 69, 674-681]). The results indicate that binding of the inhibitory region of TnI is primarily to the C-terminal domain of TnC. The results also indicate how well the synthetic peptide heterodimer mimics the C-terminal domain of TnC in structure and functional interactions.     

Functional differences between monocyte chemotactic protein-1 receptor A and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 receptor B expressed in a Jurkat T cell

The monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) receptor (MCP-1R) is expressed on monocytes, a subpopulation of memory T lymphocytes, and basophils. Two alternatively spliced forms of MCP-1R, CCR2A and CCR2B, exist and differ only in their carboxyl-terminal tails. To determine whether CCR2A and CCR2B receptors function similarly, Jurkat T cells were stably transfected with plasmids encoding the human CCR2A or CCR2B gene. Nanomolar concentrations of MCP-1 induced chemotaxis in the CCR2B transfectants that express high, intermediate, and low levels of MCP-1R. Peak chemotactic activity was shifted to the right as receptor number decreased. Five-fold more MCP-1 was required to initiate chemotaxis of the CCR2A low transfectant, but the peak of chemotaxis was similar for the CCR2A and CCR2B transfectants expressing similar numbers of receptors. MCP-1-induced chemotaxis was sensitive to pertussis toxin, implying that both CCR2A and CCR2B are G(i)alpha protein coupled. MCP-1 induced a transient Ca(2+) flux in the CCR2B transfectant that was partially sensitive to pertussis toxin. In contrast, MCP-1 did not induce Ca(2+) flux in the CCR2A transfectant. Since MCP-1 can stimulate chemotaxis of the CCR2A transfectant without inducing Ca(2+) mobilization, Ca(2+) flux may not be required for MCP-1-induced chemotaxis in the Jurkat transfectants. These results indicate that functional differences exist between the CCR2A and CCR2B transfectants that can be attributed solely to differences in the carboxyl-terminal tail.