Methods for computing the standard errors of branching points in an evolutionary tree and their application to molecular data from humans and apes

Statistical methods for computing the standard errors of the branching points of an evolutionary tree are developed. These methods are for the unweighted pair-group method-determined (UPGMA) trees reconstructed from molecular data such as amino acid sequences, nucleotide sequences, restriction-sites data, and electrophoretic distances. They were applied to data for the human, chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, and gibbon species. Among the four different sets of data used, DNA sequences for an 895-nucleotide segment of mitochondrial DNA (Brown et al. 1982) gave the most reliable tree, whereas electrophoretic data (Bruce and Ayala 1979) gave the least reliable one. The DNA sequence data suggested that the chimpanzee is the closest and that the gorilla is the next closest to the human species. The orangutan and gibbon are more distantly related to man than is the gorilla. This topology of the tree is in agreement with that for the tree obtained from chromosomal studies and DNA-hybridization experiments. However, the difference between the branching point for the human and the chimpanzee species and that for the gorilla species and the human-chimpanzee group is not statistically significant. In addition to this analysis, various factors that affect the accuracy of an estimated tree are discussed.      

Reexamination of the African hominoid trichotomy with additional sequences from the primate beta-globin gene cluster.

Additional DNA sequence information from a range of primates, including 13.7 kb from pygmy chimpanzee (Pan paniscus), was added to data sets of beta-globin gene cluster sequence alignments that span the gamma 1, gamma 2, and psi eta loci and their flanking and intergenic regions. This enlarged body of data was used to address the issue of whether the ancestral separations of gorilla, chimpanzee, and human lineages resulted from only one trichotomous branching or from two dichotomous branching events. The degree of divergence, corrected for superimposed substitutions, seen in the beta-globin gene cluster between human alleles is about a third to a half that observed between two species of chimpanzee and about a fourth that between human and chimpanzee. The divergence either between chimpanzee and gorilla or between human and gorilla is slightly greater than that between human and chimpanzee, suggesting that the ancestral separations resulted from two closely spaced dichotomous branchings. Maximum parsimony analysis further strengthened the evidence that humans and chimpanzees share the longest common ancestry. Support for this human-chimpanzee clade is statistically significant at P = 0.002 over a human-gorilla clade or a chimpanzee-gorilla clade. An analysis of expected and observed homoplasy revealed that the number of sequence changes uniquely shared by human and chimpanzee lineages is too large to be attributed to homoplasy. Molecular clock calculations that accommodated lineage variations in rates of molecular evolution yielded hominoid branching times that ranged from 17-19 million years ago (MYA) for the separation of gibbon from the other hominoids to 5-7 MYA for the separation of chimpanzees from humans. Based on the relatively late dates and mounting corroborative evidence from unlinked nuclear genes and mitochondrial DNA for the close sister grouping of humans and chimpanzees, a cladistic classification would place all apes and humans in the same family. Within this family, gibbons would be placed in one subfamily and all other extant hominoids in another subfamily. The later subfamily would be divided into a tribe for orangutans and another tribe for gorillas, chimpanzees, and humans. Finally, gorillas would be placed in one subtribe with chimpanzees and humans in another, although this last division is not as strongly supported as the other divisions.     

Cloning and nucleotide sequence of the chimpanzee c-myc gene

A DNA fragment covering the chimpanzee c-myc locus was cloned from the DNA of peripheral blood lymphocytes, sequenced, and compared to its human c-myc counterpart. The two nucleotide sequences were found to be highly homologous (99%). The divergence rate between the two species was 0.4% in exons and 1.7% in introns. The different TATA-boxes described in the human myc gene were also identified in the chimpanzee sequence and an open reading frame (ORF) was observed which overlaps the chimpanzee c-myc first exon. This latter ORF contained three silent mutations with regard to the human region, whereas the chimpanzee Myc oncoprotein coded by exons 2 and 3 differed by two amino acids from the human one.     

Different subfamilies of alphoid repetitive DNA are present on the human and chimpanzee homologous chromosomes 21 and 22.

The alphoid repeat DNA on chimpanzee chromosome 22 was compared with alphoid repeat DNA on its human homologue, chromosome 21. Hybridization of different alphoid probes under various conditions of stringency show that the alphoid repeats of chimpanzee chromosome 22 are not closely related to those of human chromosome 21. Sequence analysis of cloned dimer and tetramer EcoRI fragments from chimpanzee chromosome 22 confirm the low overall level of homology, but reveal the presence of several nucleotide changes which are exclusive to the chromosome 21 subfamily of human alphoid DNA. Southern blot analysis of alphoid repeat DNA on the chimpanzee X chromosome suggests this subfamily has been strongly conserved during and since the separation of chimpanzee and man although the two subfamilies can be distinguished on the basis of Taq I restriction fragments.     

Chromosomal domains of chimpanzee are diverged from human as revealed by in situ hybridization using human genomic probe

Utilization of repetitive DNA probes to assess the taxonomic affinity between related species has become the most powerful tool in evolutionary biology today. Consequently, tremendous strides have recently been made towards establishing the phylogenetic relationship of humans with chimpanzee. We employed human genomic proe (P5080 B.5) to identify the degree of divergence of chimpanzee genome from humans. A small protion of structurally distinct genomic areas in chimpanzee could be identified by fluorescencein situ hybridization (FISH) technique when compared to human DNA. The genomic divergence is confined mainly to the chromosomal ends in chimpanzee and may be an important phylogenetic characteristic in human evolution.     

Evolution of protamine P1 genes in primates

Protamine P1 genes have been sequenced by PCR amplification and direct DNA sequencing from 9 primates representing 5 major families, Cebidae (new world monkeys), Cercopithecidae (old world monkeys), Hylobatidae (gibbons), Pongidae (gorilla, orangutan, and chimpanzee), and Hominidae (human). In this recently diverged group of primates these genes are clearly orthologous but very variable, both at the DNA level and in their expressed amino acid sequences. The rate of variation amongst the protamine Pls indicates that they are amongst the most rapidly diverging polypeptides studied. However, some regions are conserved both in primates and generally in other placental mammals. These are the 13 N-terminal residues (including a region of alternating serine and arginine residues (the motif SRSR, res. 10–13) susceptible to Ser phosphorylation), a tract of six Arg residues (res. 24–29) in the center of the molecule, and a six-residue region (RCCRRR, res. 39–44), consisting of a pair of cysteines flanked by arginines. Detailed consideration of nearest neighbor matrices and trees based on maximum parsimony indicates that PI genes from humans, gorillas, and chimpanzees are very similar. The amino acid and nucleotide differences between humans and gorillas. are fewer than those between humans and chimpanzees. This finding is at variance with data from DNA-DNA hybridization and extensive globin and mitochondrial DNA sequences which place human and chimpanzee as closest relatives in the super family, Hominoidea. This may be related to the fact that protamine Pls are expressed in germ line rather than somatic cells. In contrast to the variability of the exon regions of the protamine P1 genes, the sequence of the single intron is highly conserved.     

A molecular cytogenetic study of chromosome evolution in chimpanzee

We applied multitude multicolor banding (mMCB) in combination with a novel FISH DNA probe set including subcentromeric, subtelomeric and whole chromosome painting probes (subCTM) to characterize a Pan paniscus (PPA) cell line. These powerful techniques allowed us to refine the breakpoints of a pericentric inversion on chimpanzee chromosome 4, and discovered a novel cryptic pericentric inversion in chimpanzee chromosome 11. mMCB provided a starting point for mapping and high resolution analysis of breakpoints on PPA chromosome 4, which are within a long terminal repeat (LTR) and surrounded by segmental duplications, as well as the integration/expansion sites of the interstitial heterochromatin on chimpanzee chromosomes 6 and 14. Moreover, we found evidence at hand for different types of heterochromatin in the chimpanzee genome. Finally, shedding new light on the human/chimpanzee speciation, karyotypes of three members of the genus Pan were studied by mMCB and no cytogenetic differences were found although the phylogenetic distance between these subspecies is suggested to be 2.5 million years.     

Lessons from chimpanzee-based research on human disease: the implications of genetic differences

Assertions that the use of chimpanzees to investigate human diseases is valid scientifically are frequently based on a reported 98-99% genetic similarity between the species. Critical analyses of the relevance of chimpanzee studies to human biology, however, indicate that this genetic similarity does not result in sufficient physiological similarity for the chimpanzee to constitute a good model for research, and furthermore, that chimpanzee data do not translate well to progress in clinical practice for humans. Leading examples include the minimal citations of chimpanzee research that is relevant to human medicine, the highly different pathology of HIV/AIDS and hepatitis C virus infection in the two species, the lack of correlation in the efficacy of vaccines and treatments between chimpanzees and humans, and the fact that chimpanzees are not useful for research on human cancer. The major molecular differences underlying these inter-species phenotypic disparities have been revealed by comparative genomics and molecular biology - there are key differences in all aspects of gene expression and protein function, from chromosome and chromatin structure to post-translational modification. The collective effects of these differences are striking, extensive and widespread, and they show that the superficial similarity between human and chimpanzee genetic sequences is of little consequence for biomedical research. The extrapolation of biomedical data from the chimpanzee to the human is therefore highly unreliable, and the use of the chimpanzee must be considered of little value, particularly given the breadth and potential of alternative methods of enquiry that are currently available to science.     

Comparative studies on an antigenicity of plasma proteins from humans and apes by ELISA: a close relationship of chimpanzee and human

1. Antigenic differences between human and ape plasma proteins were quantitatively investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) using antisera against human and chimpanzee plasmas. 2. With anti-human plasma serum, both the chimpanzee and gorilla were very close to the human, although the chimpanzee was slightly closer to the human than to the gorilla; relative immunological distance (relative ID) of the chimpanzee was 71, while that of the gorilla was 74. 3. With anti-chimpanzee plasma serum, the chimpanzee was found to be closely related to the human; relative ID of the chimpanzee was 58, while that of the gorilla was 75. 4. From these a molecular phylogeny for humans and apes was deduced; among living apes, the chimpanzee is the most closely related species to the human.     

DNA hybridization as a guide to phylogeny: Chemical and physical limits

Summary The technique of forming interspecific DNA heteroduplexes and estimating phylogenetic distances from the depression in their duplex melting temperature has several physical and chemical constraints. These constraints determine the maximum phylogenetic distance that may be estimated by this technique and the most appropriate method of analyzing that distance.Melting curves of self-renatured single copy primate DNAs reveal the presence of components absent from the renaturation products of exactly paired sequences. This observation, which confirms existing literature, challenges a fundamental assumption: that orthologous (i.e., corresponding) DNA sequences in the divergent species are being compared in DNA heteroduplex melting experiments.As a model system, the thermal stabilities of heteroduplexes formed between a human alpha-globin cDNA and four alpha-like globin genes isolated from chimpanzee are qualitatively compared. The results of this comparison show that the cross-hybrids of imperfectly matched gene duplicates from divergent species can contribute to the additional components that are present in renatured single copy DNAs. Single copy DNA, as usually defined, includes sequence duplicates that will obscure phylogenetic comparisons in a mass hybridization of genomes.     

Examination of hominid evolution by DNA sequence homology

Hominoid phylogeny was investigated in terms of unique DNA sequence homologies. In comparisons from the human standpoint the ΔTe₅₀ DNA values were Man 0, chimpanzee 0·7, gorilla 1·4, gibbon 2·7, orangutan 2·9, and African green monkey 5·7. In comparisons from the orangutan standpoint the ΔTe₅₀ DNA values were orangutan 0, chimpanzee 1·8, Man 1·9, gorilla 2·3, gibbon 2·4 and African green monkey 4·3. These results indicate that chimpanzee and gorilla are cladistically closer to Man than to orangutan and other primates, and that gorilla DNA may have diverged slightly more from the ancestral state than chimpanzee or human DNA. Comparisons from chimpanzee and gorilla DNA standpoints are needed to achieve a more definitive picture of hominoid phylogeny.     

Molecular genetics of chimpanzee Rh-related genes: Their relationship with the R-C-E-F blood group system,the chimpanzee counterpart of the human rhesus system

As the chimpanzee R-C-E-F blood group system appears to be the chimpanzee counterpart of the human Rhesus (RH) system, we have tried to determine whether chimpanzee Rh-like genes encode R-C-E-F-related proteins. Chimpanzee genomic DNA, digested by any of eight endonucleases and hybridized with three Rh exon-specific probes, exhibits a high degree of polymorphism. Analysis of DNA from unrelated individuals of different R-C-E-F types revealed that the presence of some restriction fragments is correlated with particular R-C-E-F types. The cosegregation of these fragments with R-C-E-F haplotypes was confirmed by family studies. Oligonucleotides complementary to regions flanking human exons were used as PCR primers on chimpanzee DNA; the resulting amplified fragments were identical in size to their human counterparts. Moreover, the nucleotide sequences of the fragments present a high degree of similarity to the corresponding human regions.     

The number of nucleotides required to determine the branching order of three species,with special reference to the human-chimpanzee-gorilla divergence

Summary A mathematical theory for computing the probabilities of various nucleotide configurations among related species is developed, and the probability of obtaining the correct tree (topology) from nucleotide sequence data is evaluated using models of evolutionary trees that are close to the tree of mitochondrial DNAs from human, chimpanzee, gorilla, orangutan, and gibbon. Special attention is given to the number of nucleotides required to resolve the branching order among the three most closely related organisms (human, chimpanzee, and gorilla). If the extent of DNA divergence is close to that obtained by Brown et al. for mitochondrial DNA and if sequence data are available only for the three most closely related organisms, the number of nucleotides (m^*) required to obtain the correct tree with a probability of 95% is about 4700. If sequence data for two outgroup species (orangutan and gibbon) are available, m^* becomes about 2600–2700 when the transformed distance, distance-Wagner, maximum parsimony, or compatibility method is used. In the unweighted pair-group method, m^* is not affected by the availability of data from outgroup species. When these five different tree-making methods, as well as Fitch and Margoliash's method, are applied to the mitochondrial DNA data (1834 bp) obtained by Brown et al. and by Hixson and Brown, they all give the same phylogenetic tree, in which human and chimpanzee are most closely related. However, the trees considered here are gene trees, and to obtain the correct species tree, sequence data for several independent loci must be used.     

Evolution of DNA on Y-chromosome in hominoid primates as examined by PCR

Every species of non-human primates, especially those of hominoids, has a variety of reproductive structures and accompanying male traits, such as sexual dimorphism and relative size of testis to body weight, which may be at least partly triggered by DNA on the Y-chromosome. Recently, a panel of PCR (Polymerase Chain Reaction) primer sets were designed to amplify various DNA segments spread over the human Y-chromosome. We applied these primer sets for amplification of DNA segments on the Y-chromosome of hominoid species: chimpanzee, bonobo (Pygmy chimpanzee), gorilla, orangutan, whitehanded gibbon, agile gibbon, and Japanese monkey as an out group. The DNA segments including SRY, testis determining factor, and ZFX/ZFY could be amplified clearly in males of all species examined. These highly conserved genes may serve important biological functions. However, as the phylogenic distance from humans increased, some of the DNA segments could not be amplified. For example, DYZ1 (SY160) could be amplified only using human DNA as a template, and DYF60S1 (SY61), DYZ217 (SY126) and DYS233 (SY148) could be amplified only using human and African great ape DNA. It is interesting to note that locus DYS250 (SY17) could not be amplified in chimpanzee and bonobo but amplified in gorilla and orangutan. Locus DYS251 (SY18) was amplified in all species except the white-handed gibbon. These results indicate that a variety of evolutionary events including mutation, deletion, insertion, and rearrangement occurred in Y-chromosome DNA during primate evolution.     

Comparison of chimpanzee and human leukocyte Ig-like receptor genes reveals framework and rapidly evolving genes.

The leukocyte receptor complex (LRC) on human chromosome 19 contains related Ig superfamily killer cell Ig-like receptor (KIR) and leukocyte Ig-like receptor (LIR) genes. Previously, we discovered much difference in the KIR genes between humans and chimpanzees, primate species estimated to have approximately 98.8% genomic sequence similarity. Here, the common chimpanzee LIR genes are identified, characterized, and compared with their human counterparts. From screening a chimpanzee splenocyte cDNA library, clones corresponding to nine different chimpanzee LIRs were isolated and sequenced. Analysis of genomic DNA from 48 unrelated chimpanzees showed 42 to have all nine LIR genes, and six animals to lack just one of the genes. In structural diversity and functional type, the chimpanzee LIRs cover the range of human LIRs. Although both species have the same number of inhibitory LIRs, humans have more activating receptors, a trend also seen for KIRs. Four chimpanzee LIRs are clearly orthologs of human LIRs. Five other chimpanzee LIRs have paralogous relationships with clusters of human LIRs and have undergone much recombination. Like the human genes, chimpanzee LIR genes appear to be organized into two duplicated blocks, each block containing two orthologous genes. This organization provides a conserved framework within which there are clusters of faster evolving genes. Human and chimpanzee KIR genes have an analogous arrangement. Whereas both KIR and LIR genes can exhibit greater interspecies differences than the genome average, within each species the LIR gene family is more conserved than the KIR gene family.     

A method for evaluating phylogenetic relationship of alpha-satellite DNA suprachromosomal family by nucleotide frequency calculation

The sequence similarity among chromosome-specific alpha-satellite DNA was quantitatively evaluated by a novel procedure: nucleotide frequency calculation. Tandem-arrayed repetitive DNA segments were aligned with unit length repeat, and the nucleotide frequency at each position was used to estimate the phylogenetic distance between repetitive DNA segments. The calculations for human and chimpanzee X chromosome alpha-satellites showed that the results were consistent with the known relationships of primates, indicating that the nucleotide frequency calculation worked effectively to estimate the distances between satellite arrays. Human chromosome-specific alpha-satellites had been grouped into three suprachromosomal families (I, II, and III), and in the current work the nucleotide frequency analysis has defined the quantitative distances between the chromosome-specific alpha-satellite DNA.     

Nucleotide sequences of chimpanzee MHC class I alleles: evidence for trans-species mode of evolution

To obtain an insight into the evolutionary origin of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I polymorphism, a cDNA library was prepared from a heterozygous chimpanzee cell line expressing MHC class I molecules crossreacting with allele-specific HLA-A11 antibodies. The library was screened with human class I locus-specific DNA probes, and clones encoding both alleles at the A and B loci have been identified and sequenced. In addition, the sequences of two HLA-A11 subtypes differing by a single nucleotide substitution have been obtained. The comparison of chimpanzee and human sequences revealed a close similarity (up to 98.5%). The chimpanzee A locus alleles showed greatest similarity to the human HLA-A11/A3 family of alleles, one of them being very close to HLA-A11. Similarly, segments of the ChLA-B alleles displayed greatest similarity to certain HLA-B alleles. The calculated evolutionary branch point for the A11-like alleles is 7 x 10(6) to 9 x 10(6) years, whereas the other A locus alleles diverged between 12 x 10(6) and 17 x 10(6) years ago. Since the human and chimpanzee lineages separated 5 x 10(6) to 7 x 10(6) years ago, our data support the notion that during evolution, MHC alleles are transmitted from one species to the next.     

Molecular genetic divergence of orang utan (Pongo pygmaeus) subspecies based on isozyme and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis

The orang utan (Pongo pygmaeus), as currently recognized, includes two geographically separated subspecies: Pongo pygmaeus pygmaeus, which resides on Borneo, and P. p. abelii, which inhabits Sumatra. At present, there is no known route of gene flow between the two populations except through captive individuals which have been released back into the wild over the last several decades. The two subspecies are differentiated by morphological and behavioral characters, and they can be distinguished by a subspecies specific pericentric chromosomal inversion. Nei-genetic distances were estimated between orang utan subspecies, gorilla, chimpanzee and humans using 44 isozyme loci and using 458 soluble fibroblast proteins which were resolved by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Phenetic analysis of both data sets supports the following conclusions: the orang utan subspecies distances are approximately 10 times closer to each other than they are to the African apes, and the orang utan subspecies are approximately as divergent as are the two chimpanzee species. Comparison of the genetic distances to genetic distance estimates done in the same laboratory under identical conditions reveals that the distance between Bornean vs. Sumatran orang utans is 5-10 times the distance measured between several pairs of subspecies including lions, cheetahs, and tigers. Near species level molecular genetic distances between orang utan subspecies would support the separate management of Bornean and Sumatran orang utans as evolutionary significant units (Ryder 1987). Evolutionary topologies were constructed from the distance data using both cladistic and phenetic methods. The majority of resulting trees affirmed previous molecular evolutionary studies that indicated that man and chimpanzee diverged from a common ancestor subsequent to the divergence of gorilla from the common ancestor.     

Chromosome-specific α-satellite DNA from the centromere of chimpanzee chromosome 4

The centromeric regions of human and primate chromosomes are characterized by diverged subsets of tandemly repeated α-satellite DNA. Comparison of the α-satellites on known homologous chromosomes in human and chimpanzee provides insight into the very rapid evolution of satellite DNA sequences and the mechanisms that shape complex genomes. By using oligonucleotide primers specific for a conserved region of human α-satellite DNA, we have amplified a chromosome-specific α-satellite subset from the chimpanzee genome by the polymerase chain reaction. Fluorescence in situ hybridization showed that clones pαPTR4N and pαPTR4H are homologous to sequences at the centromere of the chimpanzee chromosome 4. This α-satellite subset is organized as a series of pentameric (higher-order) repeats, operationally defined by digestion of genomic DNA with HaeIII, MboI, RsaI, SstI, and XbaI. The lengths of four independent centromeric arrays measured by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis varied between 800 and 3,500 kb (mean = 1,850 kb, SD = 1,000 kb). Nucleotide sequence analysis demonstrated that chimpanzee chromosome 4 α-satellite is most closely related to the suprachromosomal subfamily II, which is evolutionarily different from the subfamily I to which the α-satellite on the homologous human chromosome 5 belongs. This implies that the human-chimpanzee sequence divergence has not arisen from a common ancestral α-satellite repeat(s) but instead represents concerted evolution of distinct repeats on homologous chromosomes. Received: 21 February 1997; in revised form: 26 February 1997 / Accepted: 27 February 1997