Differential proliferation rates generate patterns of mechanical tension that orient tissue growth

Orientation of cell divisions is a key mechanism of tissue morphogenesis. In the growing Drosophila wing imaginal disc epithelium, most of the cell divisions in the central wing pouch are oriented along the proximal–distal (P–D) axis by the Dachsous‐Fat‐Dachs planar polarity pathway. However, cells at the periphery of the wing pouch instead tend to orient their divisions perpendicular to the P–D axis despite strong Dachs polarization. Here, we show that these circumferential divisions are oriented by circumferential mechanical forces that influence cell shapes and thus orient the mitotic spindle. We propose that this circumferential pattern of force is not generated locally by polarized constriction of individual epithelial cells. Instead, these forces emerge as a global tension pattern that appears to originate from differential rates of cell proliferation within the wing pouch. Accordingly, we show that localized overgrowth is sufficient to induce neighbouring cell stretching and reorientation of cell division. Our results suggest that patterned rates of cell proliferation can influence tissue mechanics and thus determine the orientation of cell divisions and tissue shape.     

Cell flow and tissue polarity patterns

Planar tissue polarity is a fundamental feature of many epithelia. Large-scale cell polarity patterns govern the orientation of external structures such as hairs and cilia. Tissue polarity patterns arise from the collective organization of cells, which are polarized individually. Such cell and tissue polarities are reflected in anisotropic distributions of proteins of the planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway. Here we give an overview on recent progress in understanding how large-scale patterns of tissue polarity are controlled. We highlight the role of active mechanical events in the organization of polarity patterns during the development of the pupal fly wing. Patterns of cell flow are generated by mechanical stresses exerted on the tissue as well as by oriented cell divisions and neighbor exchanges. We discuss how the resulting tissue shear controls polarity orientation. We argue that the often-observed alignment of PCP either parallel or perpendicular to the long axis of developing tissues is a characteristic consequence of shear-induced polarity alignment. This principle allows for the versatile and robust generation of polarity patterns in tissues.     

Hexagonal packing of Drosophila wing epithelial cells by the planar cell polarity pathway

The mechanisms that order cellular packing geometry are critical for the functioning of many tissues, but they are poorly understood. Here, we investigate this problem in the developing wing of Drosophila. The surface of the wing is decorated by hexagonally packed hairs that are uniformly oriented by the planar cell polarity pathway. They are constructed by a hexagonal array of wing epithelial cells. Wing epithelial cells are irregularly arranged throughout most of development, but they become hexagonally packed shortly before hair formation. During the process, individual cell boundaries grow and shrink, resulting in local neighbor exchanges, and Cadherin is actively endocytosed and recycled through Rab11 endosomes. Hexagonal packing depends on the activity of the planar cell polarity proteins. We propose that these proteins polarize trafficking of Cadherin-containing exocyst vesicles during junction remodeling. This may be a common mechanism for the action of planar cell polarity proteins in diverse systems.     

Role of cell polarity and planar cell polarity (PCP) proteins in spermatogenesis

Abstract

Studies on cell polarity proteins and planar cell polarity (PCP) proteins date back to almost 40?years ago in Drosophila and C. elegans when these proteins were shown to be crucial to support apico-basal polarity and also directional alignment of polarity cells across the plane of an epithelium during morphogenesis. In adult mammals, cell polarity and PCP are most notable in cochlear hair cells. However, the role of these two groups of proteins to support spermatogenesis was not explored until a decade earlier when several proteins that confer cell polarity and PCP proteins were identified in the rat testis. Since then, there are several reports appearing in the literature to examine the role of both cell polarity and PCP in supporting spermatogenesis. Herein, we provide an overview regarding the role of cell polarity and PCP proteins in the testis, evaluating these findings in light of studies in other mammalian epithelial cells/tissues. Our goal is to provide a timely evaluation of these findings, and provide some thought provoking remarks to guide future studies based on an evolving concept in the field.     

Planar polarity and tissue morphogenesis

Planar polarity is a global, tissue-level phenomenon that coordinates cell behavior in a two-dimensional plane. The Frizzled/planar cell polarity (PCP) and anterior-posterior (AP) patterning systems for planar polarity operate in a variety of cell types and provide direction to cells with different morphologies and behaviors. These two systems involve different sets of proteins but both use directional cues provided locally by communication between neighboring cells. This review describes our current understanding of the mechanisms that transmit directional signals from cell to cell and compares the strategies for generating global systems of spatial information in stationary and dynamic cell populations.     

Planar cell polarity: one or two pathways?

In multicellular organisms, cells are polarized in the plane of the epithelial sheet, revealed in some cell types by oriented hairs or cilia. Many of the underlying genes have been identified in Drosophila melanogaster and are conserved in vertebrates. Here we dissect the logic of planar cell polarity (PCP). We review studies of genetic mosaics in adult flies - marked cells of different genotypes help us to understand how polarizing information is generated and how it passes from one cell to another. We argue that the prevailing opinion that planar polarity depends on a single genetic pathway is wrong and conclude that there are (at least) two independently acting processes. This conclusion has major consequences for the PCP field.     

Is anisotropic propagation of polarized molecular distribution the common mechanism of swirling patterns of planar cell polarization?

Mutations in multiple planar cell polarity (PCP) genes can cause swirling patterns indicated by whorls and tufts of hairs in the wings and the abdomen of Drosophila and in the skin of vertebrates. Damaged global directional cue caused by mutations in four-jointed, fat, and dachsous, impaired cellular hexagonal packing caused by mutations in frizzled, or weakened intracellular signaling caused by mutations in disheveled, inturned, and prickle all make hair patterns globally irregular yet locally aligned, and in some cases, typically swirling. Why and how mutations in different genes all lead to swirling patterns is unexplored. Although the mechanisms of molecular signaling remain unclear, the features of molecular distribution are evident-most PCP molecules develop the polarized distribution in cells and this distribution can be induced by intercellular signaling. Does this suggest something fundamental to swirling patterns beyond the particular functions of genes, proteins, and signaling? A simple model indeed indicates this. Disregarding detailed molecular interactions, the induced polarization of molecular distribution in an epithelial cell can be modeled as the induced polarization of positive and negative charge distribution in a dielectric molecule. Simulations reveal why and how mutations in different genes all lead to swirling patterns, and in particular, the conditions for generating typical swirling patterns. The results show that the anisotropic propagation of polarized molecular distribution may be the common mechanism of swirling patterns caused by different mutations. They also suggest that at the cell level, as at the molecular level, a simple mechanism can generate complex and diverse patterning phenotypes in different molecular contexts. The similarity between the induced polarization and its propagation in both the epithelial cells and the dielectric molecules also interestingly suggests some commonalities between pattern formation in the biological and physical systems.     

Coupling mechanical deformations and planar cell polarity to create regular patterns in the zebrafish retina

The orderly packing and precise arrangement of epithelial cells is essential to the functioning of many tissues, and refinement of this packing during development is a central theme in animal morphogenesis. The mechanisms that determine epithelial cell shape and position, however, remain incompletely understood. Here, we investigate these mechanisms in a striking example of planar order in a vertebrate epithelium: The periodic, almost crystalline distribution of cone photoreceptors in the adult teleost fish retina. Based on observations of the emergence of photoreceptor packing near the retinal margin, we propose a mathematical model in which ordered columns of cells form as a result of coupling between planar cell polarity (PCP) and anisotropic tissue-scale mechanical stresses. This model recapitulates many observed features of cone photoreceptor organization during retinal growth and regeneration. Consistent with the model's predictions, we report a planar-polarized distribution of Crumbs2a protein in cone photoreceptors in both unperturbed and regenerated tissue. We further show that the pattern perturbations predicted by the model to occur if the imposed stresses become isotropic closely resemble defects in the cone pattern in zebrafish lrp2 mutants, in which intraocular pressure is increased, resulting in altered mechanical stress and ocular enlargement. Evidence of interactions linking PCP, cell shape, and mechanical stresses has recently emerged in a number of systems, several of which show signs of columnar cell packing akin to that described here. Our results may hence have broader relevance for the organization of cells in epithelia. Whereas earlier models have allowed only for unidirectional influences between PCP and cell mechanics, the simple, phenomenological framework that we introduce here can encompass a broad range of bidirectional feedback interactions among planar polarity, shape, and stresses; our model thus represents a conceptual framework that can address many questions of importance to morphogenesis.     

Planar cell polarity and tissue design: Shaping the Drosophila wing membrane

Planar cell polarity (PCP) describes the orientation of a cell within the plane of an epithelial cell layer. During tissue development, epithelial cells normally align their PCP so that they face in the same direction. This alignment allows cells to move in a common direction, or to generate structures with a common orientation. A classic system for studying the coordination of epithelial PCP is the developing Drosophila wing. The alignment of epithelial PCP during pupal wing development allows the production of an array of cell hairs that point towards the wing tip. Multiple studies have established that the Frizzled (Fz) PCP signaling pathway coordinates wing PCP. Recently, we have found that the same pathway also controls the formation of ridges on the Drosophila wing membrane. However, in contrast to hair polarity, ridge orientation differs between the anterior and posterior wing. How can the Fz PCP pathway generate a different relationship between hair and ridge orientation in different parts of the wing? In this Extra View article, we discuss membrane ridge development drawing upon our recent PLoS Genetics paper and other, published and unpublished, data. We also speculate upon how our findings impact the ongoing debate concerning the interaction of the Fz PCP and Fat/Dachsous pathways in the control of PCP.     

Planar cell polarity and tissue design

Planar cell polarity (PCP) describes the orientation of a cell within the plane of an epithelial cell layer. During tissue development, epithelial cells normally align their PCP so that they face in the same direction. This alignment allows cells to move in a common direction, or to generate structures with a common orientation. A classic system for studying the coordination of epithelial PCP is the developing Drosophila wing. The alignment of epithelial PCP during pupal wing development allows the production of an array of cell hairs that point towards the wing tip. Multiple studies have established that the Frizzled (Fz) PCP signaling pathway coordinates wing PCP. Recently, we have found that the same pathway also controls the formation of ridges on the Drosophila wing membrane. However, in contrast to hair polarity, ridge orientation differs between the anterior and posterior wing. How can the Fz PCP pathway generate a different relationship between hair and ridge orientation in different parts of the wing? In this Extra View article, we discuss membrane ridge development drawing upon our recent PLoS Genetics paper and other, published and unpublished, data. We also speculate upon how our findings impact the ongoing debate concerning the interaction of the Fz PCP and Fat/Dachsous pathways in the control of PCP.     

The Role of Endocytosis during Morphogenetic Signaling

Morphogens are signaling molecules that are secreted by a localized source and spread in a target tissue where they are involved in the regulation of growth and patterning. Both the activity of morphogenetic signaling and the kinetics of ligand spreading in a tissue depend on endocytosis and intracellular trafficking. Here, we review quantitative approaches to study how large-scale morphogen profiles and signals emerge in a tissue from cellular trafficking processes and endocytic pathways. Starting from the kinetics of endosomal networks, we discuss the role of cellular trafficking and receptor dynamics in the formation of morphogen gradients. These morphogen gradients scale during growth, which implies that overall tissue size influences cellular trafficking kinetics. Finally, we discuss how such morphogen profiles can be used to control tissue growth. We emphasize the role of theory in efforts to bridge between scales.A fundamental challenge in biology is to understand how morphologies and complex patterns form in multicellular systems by the collective organization of many cells. Cells divide and undergo apoptosis, and they communicate via signaling pathways that use molecules as information carriers. In tissues, large-scale patterns of gene expression emerge from the coordinated signaling activity and response of many cells. The establishment of such patterns is often guided by long-range concentration profiles of morphogens. Cell divisions and cell rearrangements must be coordinated over large distances to achieve specific tissue sizes and shapes. To unravel how molecular processes and interactions can eventually be responsible for the formation of structures and patterns in tissues during development, it is important to study processes at different scales and understand how different levels of organization are connected. Such an approach becomes strongest if it involves a combination of quantitative experimental studies with theory.In the present article, we discuss several such approaches on different scales with a particular emphasis on theory. Starting from the kinetic and dynamic properties of endosomal networks inside a cell, we discuss transport processes in a tissue that can be related to kinetic trafficking parameters. Such transport processes are then responsible for the formation of graded morphogen concentration profiles. To permit scalable patterns in tissues of different sizes, it has been suggested that morphogen gradients scale during growth. This can be achieved on the tissue level by feedback systems that are sensitive to tissue size and regulate, for example, morphogen degradation. Finally, morphogen gradients that scale with tissue size can provide a system to robustly organize cell division in a large tissue and generate homogeneous growth. Theory can play an important role to bridge scales and understand how molecular and cellular processes can control pattern formation and tissue growth on larger scales.Morphogens are signaling molecules that are secreted in specific regions of developing tissues and can induce signaling activity far from their source. They typically form graded concentration profiles and therefore endow cells with positional information (cells can obtain information about their position in a tissue). Thus, they can guide cells to differentiate into complex morphological patterns. Morphogens also control cell growth and cell division. Because they control both patterning and growth, they may play a key role to coordinate these two processes. Such coordination is important because the size of morphological patterns must adjust during growth, whereas growth influences such patterns. A well-studied morphogen is Decapentaplegic (Dpp), which controls morphogenesis in the imaginal wing disc of developing Drosophila. Consequently, mutations in Dpp or defects in the trafficking pathways that control its graded concentration profiles and signaling affect the formation and structure of the adult wing.The study of morphogens was traditionally approached from a genetic perspective: Which gene products behave like morphogens? Which mutants affect patterning and growth? The realization that morphogens typically operate by a gradient of concentration raised the question of how morphogen gradients are generated. It became clear that the cellular trafficking of morphogens is a key issue for the generation of morphogen profiles. Morphogens are secreted ligands that bind receptors in the plasma membrane. The secretion of the ligands and the concentrations of receptor, ligand, and receptor/ligand complex at the plasma membrane are governed by their trafficking in the cell by vesicular transport. In particular, it was shown that trafficking through the endocytic pathway has an important impact on the formation of morphogen gradients (reviewed in Gonzalez-Gaitan 2003; see Bökel and Brand 2014). This is, to a large extent, how the cells respond to morphogens and contribute to set their local concentrations. To understand functions of morphogens in a tissue, we need to study how the gradient is formed. This, in turn, requires insights into morphogen trafficking through the endocytic pathway. The problem of morphogen behavior, therefore, becomes a problem spanning several levels of complexity: the organ level, the tissue level, the cell level, the organelle level, and the molecular level. Theoretical approaches motivated by physics combined with quantitative experimental approaches provide an ideal framework to understand how these different levels of complexity are intertwined.Two recent discoveries highlighted such integration. (1) The observation that profiles of the morphogen Dpp scale during growth, which implies that the rate of Dpp degradation mediated by the endocytic pathway of each of the cells in the tissue depends on the size of the overall tissue. This suggests that two levels of complexity are linked because cellular trafficking receives cues about the global tissue size. (2) As a result of the changes of the degradation rate that leads to gradient scaling, cells receive an increasing level of signaling. This, in turn, can be used by the cells to decide when to divide. This regulation again involves two levels of complexity because regulation at the endocytic pathway determines the growth properties of the tissue and, ultimately, its final size.In the following, we discuss quantitative approaches to study cellular signaling processes on different scales. Here, the aim is to understand how patterns on large scales can emerge during development from molecular processes and signaling pathways that involve endocytosis and cellular trafficking. We begin by describing trafficking of ligands in the endocytic pathway. We then consider the situation of a morphogen ligand and its impact in gradient formation. Subsequently, we discuss how gradient scaling might be realized. Finally, we discuss how such scaling processes play an important role in the regulation of morphogenetic growth.     

Interactions between Fat and Dachsous and the regulation of planar cell polarity in the Drosophila wing

It was recently suggested that a proximal to distal gradient of the protocadherin Dachsous (Ds) acts as a cue for planar cell polarity (PCP) in the Drosophila wing, orienting cell-cell interactions by inhibiting the activity of the protocadherin Fat (Ft). This Ft-Ds signaling model is based on mutant loss-of-function phenotypes, leaving open the question of whether Ds is instructive or permissive for PCP. We developed tools for misexpressing ds and ft in vitro and in vivo, and have used these to test aspects of the model. First, this model predicts that Ds and Ft can bind. We show that Ft and Ds mediate preferentially heterophilic cell adhesion in vitro, and that each stabilizes the other on the cell surface. Second, the model predicts that artificial gradients of Ds are sufficient to reorient PCP in the wing; our data confirms this prediction. Finally, loss-of-function phenotypes suggest that the gradient of ds expression is necessary for correct PCP throughout the wing. Surprisingly, this is not the case. Uniform levels of ds drive normally oriented PCP and, in all but the most proximal regions of the wing, uniform ds rescues the ds mutant PCP phenotype. Nor are distal PCP defects increased by the loss of spatial information from the distally expressed four-jointed (fj) gene, which encodes putative modulator of Ft-Ds signaling. Thus, while our results support the existence of Ft-Ds binding and show that it is sufficient to alter PCP, ds expression is permissive or redundant with other PCP cues in much of the wing.     

Epidermal Growth Factor Signalling Controls Myosin II Planar Polarity to Orchestrate Convergent Extension Movements during Drosophila Tubulogenesis

Most epithelial tubes arise as small buds and elongate by regulated morphogenetic processes including oriented cell division, cell rearrangements, and changes in cell shape. Through live analysis of Drosophila renal tubule morphogenesis we show that tissue elongation results from polarised cell intercalations around the tubule circumference, producing convergent-extension tissue movements. Using genetic techniques, we demonstrate that the vector of cell movement is regulated by localised epidermal growth factor (EGF) signalling from the distally placed tip cell lineage, which sets up a distal-to-proximal gradient of pathway activation to planar polarise cells, without the involvement for PCP gene activity. Time-lapse imaging at subcellular resolution shows that the acquisition of planar polarity leads to asymmetric pulsatile Myosin II accumulation in the basal, proximal cortex of tubule cells, resulting in repeated, transient shortening of their circumferential length. This repeated bias in the polarity of cell contraction allows cells to move relative to each other, leading to a reduction in cell number around the lumen and an increase in tubule length. Physiological analysis demonstrates that animals whose tubules fail to elongate exhibit abnormal excretory function, defective osmoregulation, and lethality.     

Twinstar, the Drosophila homolog of cofilin/ADF, is required for planar cell polarity patterning

Planar cell polarity (PCP) is a level of tissue organization in which cells adopt a uniform orientation within the plane of an epithelium. The process of tissue polarization is likely to be initiated by an extracellular gradient. Thus, determining how cells decode and convert this graded information into subcellular asymmetries is key to determining how cells direct the reorganization of the cytoskeleton to produce uniformly oriented structures. Twinstar (Tsr), the Drosophila homolog of Cofilin/ADF (actin depolymerization factor), is a component of the cytoskeleton that regulates actin dynamics. We show here that various alleles of tsr produce PCP defects in the wing, eye and several other epithelia. In wings mutant for tsr, Frizzled (Fz) and Flamingo (Fmi) proteins do not properly localize to the proximodistal boundaries of cells. The correct asymmetric localization of these proteins instructs the actin cytoskeleton to produce one actin-rich wing hair at the distal-most vertex of each cell. These results argue that actin remodeling is not only required in the manufacture of wing hairs, but also in the PCP read-out that directs where a wing hair will be secreted.     

Revisiting planar cell polarity in the inner ear

Since the first implication of the core planar cell polarity (PCP) pathway in stereocilia orientation of sensory hair cells in the mammalian cochlea, much has been written about this subject, in terms of understanding how this pathway can shape the mammalian hair cells and using the inner ear as a model system to understand mammalian PCP signaling. However, many conflicting results have arisen, leading to puzzling questions regarding the actual mechanism and roles of core PCP signaling in mammals and invertebrates. In this review, we summarize our current knowledge on the establishment of PCP during inner ear development and revisit the contrast between wing epithelial cells in Drosophila melanogaster and sensory epithelia in the mammalian cochlea. Notably, we focus on similarities and differences in the asymmetric distribution of core PCP proteins in the context of cell autonomous versus non-autonomous role of PCP signaling in the two systems. Additionally, we address the relationship between the kinocilium position and PCP in cochlear hair cells and increasing results suggest an alternate cell autonomous pathway in regulating PCP in sensory hair cells.     

Wnt signaling gradients establish planar cell polarity by inducing Vangl2 phosphorylation through Ror2

It is fundamentally important that signaling gradients provide positional information to govern morphogenesis of multicellular organisms. Morphogen gradients can generate different cell types in specific spatial order at distinct threshold concentrations. However, it is largely unknown whether and how signaling gradients also control cell polarities by acting as global cues. Here, we show that Wnt signaling gradient provides directional information to a field of cells. Vangl2, a core component in planar cell polarity, forms Wnt-induced receptor complex with Ror2 to sense Wnt dosages. Wnts dose-dependently induce Vangl2 phosphorylation of serine/threonine residues and Vangl2 activities depend on its levels of phosphorylation. In the limb bud, Wnt5a signaling gradient controls limb elongation by establishing PCP in chondrocytes along the proximal-distal axis through regulating Vangl2 phosphorylation. Our studies have provided new insight to Robinow syndrome, Brachydactyly Type B1, and spinal bifida which are caused by mutations in human ROR2, WNT5A, or VANGL.     

The WD40 repeat protein fritz links cytoskeletal planar polarity to frizzled subcellular localization in the Drosophila epidermis

Much of our understanding of the genetic mechanisms that control planar cell polarity (PCP) in epithelia has derived from studies of the formation of polarized cell hairs during Drosophila wing development. The correct localization of an F-actin prehair to the distal vertex of the pupal wing cell has been shown to be dependent upon the polarized subcellular localization of Frizzled and other core PCP proteins. However, the core PCP proteins do not organize actin cytoskeletal polarity directly but require PCP effector proteins such as Fuzzy and Inturned to mediate this process. Here we describe the characterization of a new PCP effector gene, fritz, that encodes a novel but evolutionarily conserved coiled-coil WD40 protein. We show that the fritz gene product functions cell-autonomously downstream of the core PCP proteins to regulate both the location and the number of wing cell prehair initiation sites.     

Intra-membrane ligand diffusion and cell shape modulate juxtacrine patterning

A key problem in developmental biology is how pattern and planar polarity are transmitted in epithelial structures. Examples include Drosophila neuronal differentiation, ommatidia formation in the compound eye, and wing hair polarization. A key component for the generation of such patterns is direct cell-cell signalling by transmembrane ligands, called juxtacrine signalling. Previous models for this mode of communication have considered homogeneous distributions in the cell membrane, and the role of polarity has been largely ignored. In this paper we determine the role of inhomogeneous protein and receptor distributions in juxtacrine signalling. We explicitly include individual membrane segments, diffusive transport of proteins and receptors between these segments, and production terms with a combination of local and global responses to ligand binding. Our analysis shows that intra-membrane ligand transport is vital for the generation of long wavelength patterns. Moreover, with no ligand transport, there is no pattern formation for lateral induction, a process in which receptor activation up-regulates ligand production. Biased production of ligand also modulates patterning bifurcations and predicted wavelengths. In addition, biased ligand and receptor trafficking can lead to regular polarity across a lattice, in which each cell has the same orientation-directly analogous to patterns of hairs in the Drosophila wing. We confirm the trends in pattern wavelengths previously observed for patterns with cellular homogeneity-lateral inhibition tends to give short-range patterns, while lateral induction can give patterns with much longer wavelengths. Moreover, the original model can be recovered if intra-membrane bound receptor diffusion is included and rapid equilibriation between the sides is considered. Finally, we consider the role of irregular cell shapes and waves in such networks, including wave propagation past clones of non-signalling cells.     

Lineage-tracing cells born in different domains along the PD axis of the developing Drosophila leg.

Patterning of the developing limbs by the secreted signaling proteins Wingless, Hedgehog and Dpp takes place while the imaginal discs are growing rapidly. Cells born in regions of high ligand concentration may be displaced through growth to regions of lower ligand concentration. We have used a novel lineage-tagging method to address the reversibility of cell fate specification by morphogen gradients. We find that responses to Hedgehog and Dpp in the wing disc are readily reversible. In the leg, we find that cells readily adopt more distal fates, but do not normally shift from distal to proximal fate. However, they can do so if given a growth advantage. These results indicate that cell fate specification by morphogen gradients remains largely reversible while the imaginal discs grow. In other systems, where growth and patterning are uncoupled, nonreversible specification events or 'ratchet' effects may be of functional significance.     

Drosophila ATP6AP2/VhaPRR functions both as a novel planar cell polarity core protein and a regulator of endosomal trafficking

Planar cell polarity (PCP) controls the orientation of cells within tissues and the polarized outgrowth of cellular appendages. So far, six PCP core proteins including the transmembrane proteins Frizzled (Fz), Strabismus (Stbm) and Flamingo (Fmi) have been identified. These proteins form asymmetric PCP domains at apical junctions of epithelial cells. Here, we demonstrate that VhaPRR, an accessory subunit of the proton pump V‐ATPase, directly interacts with the protocadherin Fmi through its extracellular domain. It also shows a striking co‐localization with PCP proteins during all pupal wing stages in Drosophila. This localization depends on intact PCP domains. Reversely, VhaPRR is required for stable PCP domains, identifying it as a novel PCP core protein. VhaPRR performs an additional role in vesicular acidification as well as endolysosomal sorting and degradation. Membrane proteins, such as E‐Cadherin and the Notch receptor, accumulate at the surface and in intracellular vesicles of cells mutant for VhaPRR. This trafficking defect is shared by other V‐ATPase subunits. By contrast, the V‐ATPase does not seem to have a direct role in PCP regulation. Together, our results suggest two roles for VhaPRR, one for PCP and another in endosomal trafficking. This dual function establishes VhaPRR as a key factor in epithelial morphogenesis.