Interplay among replicative and specialized DNA polymerases determines failure or success of translesion synthesis pathways

Living cells possess a panel of specialized DNA polymerases that deal with the large diversity of DNA lesions that occur in their genomes. How specialized DNA polymerases gain access to the replication intermediate in the vicinity of the lesion is unknown. Using a model system in which a single replication blocking lesion can be bypassed concurrently by two pathways that leave distinct molecular signatures, we analyzed the complex interplay among replicative and specialized DNA polymerases. The system involves a single N-2-acetylaminofluorene guanine adduct within the NarI frameshift hot spot that can be bypassed concurrently by Pol II or Pol V, yielding a −2 frameshift or an error-free bypass product, respectively. Reconstitution of the two pathways using purified DNA polymerases Pol III, Pol II and Pol V and a set of essential accessory factors was achieved under conditions that recapitulate the known in vivo requirements. With this approach, we have identified the key replication intermediates that are used preferentially by Pol II and Pol V, respectively. Using single-hit conditions, we show that the β-clamp is critical by increasing the processivity of Pol II during elongation of the slipped −2 frameshift intermediate by one nucleotide which, surprisingly, is enough to support subsequent elongation by Pol III rather than degradation. Finally, the proofreading activity of the replicative polymerase prevents the formation of a Pol II-mediated −1 frameshift product. In conclusion, failure or success of TLS pathways appears to be the net result of a complex interplay among DNA polymerases and accessory factors.     

Translesion synthesis in Escherichia coli: lessons from the NarI mutation hot spot

Duplication of DNA containing damaged bases is a challenge to DNA polymerases that normally replicate with high speed, high accuracy and high processivity undamaged templates only. When a replicative DNA polymerase encounters a chemically altered base that it is unable to copy, a process called translesion synthesis (TLS) takes place during which the replicative polymerase is transiently replaced by a so-called specialized or lesion bypass polymerase. In addition to the central players that are the replicative and translesion DNA polymerases, TLS pathways involve accessory factors such as the general replication processivity factor (i.e. the beta-clamp in prokaryotes and PCNA in eukaryotes). In Escherichia coli, besides the beta-clamp, RecA plays a fundamental role as a co-factor of Pol V the major bypass polymerase in this organism. An integrated view of TLS pathways necessarily requires both genetic and biochemical studies. In this review we will attempt to summarize the insights into TLS gained over the last 25 years by studying a frameshift mutation hot spot, the NarI site. This site was initially discovered by serendipity when establishing a forward mutation spectrum induced by a chemical hepatocarcinogen, N-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF). Indeed, this chemical carcinogen covalently binds to DNA forming adducts with guanine residues. When bound to G* in the NarI site, 5'-GGCG*CC-, AAF induces the loss of the G*pC dinucleotide at a frequency that is approximately 10(7)-fold higher than the spontaneous frequency. In vivo studies showed that the NarI mutation hot spot is neither restricted to the NarI sequence itself, nor to the carcinogen AAF. Instead, the hot spot requires a sequence containing at least two GpC repeats and any of a family of aromatic amides and nitro aromatic compounds that form a large class of human carcinogens. Genetic analysis initially revealed that the NarI frameshift pathway is SOS dependent but umuDC (i.e. Pol V) independent. More recently, DNA Pol II was identified as the enzyme responsible of this frameshift pathway. Concurrently the AAF adduct in the NarI site can be bypassed in an error-free way by Pol V. The NarI site thus offers a unique possibility to study the interplay between two specialized DNA polymerases, Pol II and Pol V, that can both extend replication intermediates formed when the replicative Pol III dissociates in the vicinity of the damage. Full reconstitution of the two pathways led us to highlight a key feature for TLS pathways, namely that it is critical the specialized DNA polymerase synthesizes, during the course of a single binding event, a patch of DNA synthesis (TLS patch) that is long enough as to "hide the lesion induced distortion" from the proofreading activity upon reloading of the replicative DNA polymerase (or any exonuclease that may get access to the primer when the specialized DNA polymerase detaches). The beta-clamp, to which all DNA polymerases bind, plays a critical role in allowing the specialized DNA polymerases to synthesize TLS patches that are long enough to resist such "external proofreading" activities.     

The biochemical requirements of DNA polymerase V-mediated translesion synthesis revisited

In addition to replicative DNA polymerases, cells contain specialized DNA polymerases involved in processes such as lesion tolerance, mutagenesis and immunoglobulin diversity. In Escherichia coli, DNA polymerase V (Pol V), encoded by the umuDC locus, is involved in translesion synthesis (TLS) and mutagenesis. Genetic studies have established that mutagenesis requires both UmuC and a proteolytic product of UmuD (UmuD'). In addition, RecA protein and the replication processivity factor, the beta-clamp, were genetically found to be essential co-factors for mutagenesis. Here, we have reconstituted Pol V-mediated bypass of three common replication-blocking lesions, namely the two major UV-induced lesions and a guanine adduct formed by a chemical carcinogen (G-AAF) under conditions that fulfil these in vivo requirements. Two co-factors are essential for efficient Pol V-mediated lesion bypass: (i) a DNA substrate onto which the beta-clamp is stably loaded; and (ii) an extended single-stranded RecA/ATP filament assembled downstream from the lesion site. For efficient bypass, Pol V needs to interact simultaneously with the beta-clamp and the 3' tip of the RecA filament. Formation of an extended RecA/ATP filament and stable loading of the beta-clamp are best achieved on long single-stranded circular DNA templates. In contrast to previously published data, the single-stranded DNA-binding protein (SSB) is not absolutely required for Pol V-mediated lesion bypass provided ATP, instead of ATPgammaS, activates the RecA filament. Further discrepancies with the existing literature are explainable by the use of either inadequate DNA substrates or a UmuC fusion protein instead of native Pol V.     

Altered translesion synthesis in E. coli Pol V mutants selected for increased recombination inhibition

Replication of damaged DNA, also termed as translesion synthesis (TLS), involves specialized DNA polymerases that bypass DNA lesions. In Escherichia coli, although TLS can involve one or a combination of DNA polymerases depending on the nature of the lesion, it generally requires the Pol V DNA polymerase (formed by two SOS proteins, UmuD' and UmuC) and the RecA protein. In addition to being an essential component of translesion DNA synthesis, Pol V is also an antagonist of RecA-mediated recombination. We have recently isolated umuD' and umuC mutants on the basis of their increased capacity to inhibit homologous recombination. Despite the capacity of these mutants to form a Pol V complex and to interact with the RecA polymer, most of them exhibit a defect in TLS. Here, we further characterize the TLS activity of these Pol V mutants in vivo by measuring the extent of error-free and mutagenic bypass at a single (6-4)TT lesion located in double stranded plasmid DNA. TLS is markedly decreased in most Pol V mutants that we analyzed (8/9) with the exception of one UmuC mutant (F287L) that exhibits wild-type bypass activity. Somewhat unexpectedly, Pol V mutants that are partially deficient in TLS are more severely affected in mutagenic bypass compared to error-free synthesis. The defect in bypass activity of the Pol V mutant polymerases is discussed in light of the location of the respective mutations in the 3D structure of UmuD' and the DinB/UmuC homologous protein Dpo4 of Sulfolobus solfataricus.     

Exchange between Escherichia coli polymerases II and III on a processivity clamp

Escherichia coli has three DNA polymerases implicated in the bypass of DNA damage, a process called translesion synthesis (TLS) that alleviates replication stalling. Although these polymerases are specialized for different DNA lesions, it is unclear if they interact differently with the replication machinery. Of the three, DNA polymerase (Pol) II remains the most enigmatic. Here we report a stable ternary complex of Pol II, the replicative polymerase Pol III core complex and the dimeric processivity clamp, β. Single-molecule experiments reveal that the interactions of Pol II and Pol III with β allow for rapid exchange during DNA synthesis. As with another TLS polymerase, Pol IV, increasing concentrations of Pol II displace the Pol III core during DNA synthesis in a minimal reconstitution of primer extension. However, in contrast to Pol IV, Pol II is inefficient at disrupting rolling-circle synthesis by the fully reconstituted Pol III replisome. Together, these data suggest a β-mediated mechanism of exchange between Pol II and Pol III that occurs outside the replication fork.     

The processing of a Benzo(a)pyrene adduct into a frameshift or a base substitution mutation requires a different set of genes in Escherichia coli

Replication through a single DNA lesion may give rise to a panel of translesion synthesis (TLS) events, which comprise error-free TLS, base substitutions and frameshift mutations. In order to determine the genetic control of the various TLS events induced by a single lesion, we have chosen the major N2-dG adduct of (+)-anti-Benzo(a)pyrene diol epoxide [(+)-anti-BPDE] adduct located within a short run of guanines as a model lesion. Within this sequence context, in addition to the major event, i.e. error-free TLS, the adduct also induces base substitutions (mostly G --> T transversions) and -1 frameshift mutations. The pathway leading to G --> T base substitution mutagenesis appears to be SOS independent, suggesting that TLS is most probably performed by the replicative Pol III holoenzyme itself. In contrast, both error-free and frameshift TLS pathways are dependent upon SOS-encoded functions that belong to the pool of inducible DNA polymerases specialized in TLS (translesional DNA polymerases), namely umuDC (Pol V) and dinB (Pol IV). It is likely that, given the diversity of conformations that can be adopted by lesion-containing replication intermediates, cells use one or several translesional DNA polymerases to achieve TLS.     

Mouse Rev1 protein interacts with multiple DNA polymerases involved in translesion DNA synthesis

Pol kappa and Rev1 are members of the Y family of DNA polymerases involved in tolerance to DNA damage by replicative bypass [translesion DNA synthesis (TLS)]. We demonstrate that mouse Rev1 protein physically associates with Pol kappa. We show too that Rev1 interacts independently with Rev7 (a subunit of a TLS polymerase, Pol zeta) and with two other Y-family polymerases, Pol iota and Pol eta. Mouse Pol kappa, Rev7, Pol iota and Pol eta each bind to the same approximately 100 amino acid C-terminal region of Rev1. Furthermore, Rev7 competes directly with Pol kappa for binding to the Rev1 C-terminus. Notwithstanding the physical interaction between Rev1 and Pol kappa, the DNA polymerase activity of each measured by primer extension in vitro is unaffected by the complex, either when extending normal primer-termini, when bypassing a single thymine glycol lesion, or when extending certain mismatched primer termini. Our observations suggest that Rev1 plays a role(s) in mediating protein-protein interactions among DNA polymerases required for TLS. The precise function(s) of these interactions during TLS remains to be determined.     

PCNA trimer instability inhibits translesion synthesis by DNA polymerase η and by DNA polymerase δ

Translesion synthesis (TLS), the process by which DNA polymerases replicate through DNA lesions, is the source of most DNA damage-induced mutations. Sometimes TLS is carried out by replicative polymerases that have evolved to synthesize DNA on non-damaged templates. Most of the time, however, TLS is carried out by specialized translesion polymerases that have evolved to synthesize DNA on damaged templates. TLS requires the mono-ubiquitylation of the replication accessory factor proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). PCNA and ubiquitin-modified PCNA (UbPCNA) stimulate TLS by replicative and translesion polymerases. Two mutant forms of PCNA, one with an E113G substitution and one with a G178S substitution, support normal cell growth but inhibit TLS thereby reducing mutagenesis in yeast. A re-examination of the structures of both mutant PCNA proteins revealed substantial disruptions of the subunit interface that forms the PCNA trimer. Both mutant proteins have reduced trimer stability with the G178S substitution causing a more severe defect. The mutant forms of PCNA and UbPCNA do not stimulate TLS of an abasic site by either replicative Pol δ or translesion Pol η. Normal replication by Pol η was also impacted, but normal replication by Pol δ was much less affected. These findings support a model in which reduced trimer stability causes these mutant PCNA proteins to occasionally undergo conformational changes that compromise their ability to stimulate TLS by both replicative and translesion polymerases.     

Structural basis for recruitment of translesion DNA polymerase Pol IV/DinB to the beta-clamp

Y-family DNA polymerases can extend primer strands across template strand lesions that stall replicative polymerases. The poor processivity and fidelity of these enzymes, key to their biological role, requires that their access to the primer-template junction is both facilitated and regulated in order to minimize mutations. These features are believed to be provided by interaction with processivity factors, beta-clamp or proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), which are also essential for the function of replicative DNA polymerases. The basis for this interaction is revealed by the crystal structure of the complex between the 'little finger' domain of the Y-family DNA polymerase Pol IV and the beta-clamp processivity factor, both from Escherichia coli. The main interaction involves a C-terminal peptide of Pol IV, and is similar to interactions seen between isolated peptides and other processivity factors. However, this first structure of an entire domain of a binding partner with an assembled clamp reveals a substantial secondary interface, which maintains the polymerase in an inactive orientation, and may regulate the switch between replicative and Y-family DNA polymerases in response to a template strand lesion.     

Def1 Promotes the Degradation of Pol3 for Polymerase Exchange to Occur During DNA-Damage–Induced Mutagenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

DNA damages hinder the advance of replication forks because of the inability of the replicative polymerases to synthesize across most DNA lesions. Because stalled replication forks are prone to undergo DNA breakage and recombination that can lead to chromosomal rearrangements and cell death, cells possess different mechanisms to ensure the continuity of replication on damaged templates. Specialized, translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerases can take over synthesis at DNA damage sites. TLS polymerases synthesize DNA with a high error rate and are responsible for damage-induced mutagenesis, so their activity must be strictly regulated. However, the mechanism that allows their replacement of the replicative polymerase is unknown. Here, using protein complex purification and yeast genetic tools, we identify Def1 as a key factor for damage-induced mutagenesis in yeast. In in vivo experiments we demonstrate that upon DNA damage, Def1 promotes the ubiquitylation and subsequent proteasomal degradation of Pol3, the catalytic subunit of the replicative polymerase δ, whereas Pol31 and Pol32, the other two subunits of polymerase δ, are not affected. We also show that purified Pol31 and Pol32 can form a complex with the TLS polymerase Rev1. Our results imply that TLS polymerases carry out DNA lesion bypass only after the Def1-assisted removal of Pol3 from the stalled replication fork.     

Eukaryotic DNA polymerases require an iron-sulfur cluster for the formation of active complexes

The eukaryotic replicative DNA polymerases (Pol α, δ and ?) and the major DNA mutagenesis enzyme Pol ζ contain two conserved cysteine-rich metal-binding motifs (CysA and CysB) in the C-terminal domain (CTD) of their catalytic subunits. Here we demonstrate by in vivo and in vitro approaches the presence of an essential [4Fe-4S] cluster in the CysB motif of all four yeast B-family DNA polymerases. Loss of the [4Fe-4S] cofactor by cysteine ligand mutagenesis in Pol3 destabilized the CTD and abrogated interaction with the Pol31 and Pol32 subunits. Reciprocally, overexpression of accessory subunits increased the amount of the CTD-bound Fe-S cluster. This implies an important physiological role of the Fe-S cluster in polymerase complex stabilization. Further, we demonstrate that the Zn-binding CysA motif is required for PCNA-mediated Pol δ processivity. Together, our findings show that the function of eukaryotic replicative DNA polymerases crucially depends on different metallocenters for accessory subunit recruitment and replisome stability.     

A novel variant of DNA polymerase ζ, Rev3ΔC,highlights differential regulation of Pol32 as a subunit of polymerase δ versus ζ in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Unrepaired DNA lesions often stall replicative DNA polymerases and are bypassed by translesion synthesis (TLS) to prevent replication fork collapse. Mechanisms of TLS are lesion- and species-specific, with a prominent role of specialized DNA polymerases with relaxed active sites. After nucleotide(s) are incorporated across from the altered base(s), the aberrant primer termini are typically extended by DNA polymerase ζ (pol ζ). As a result, pol ζ is responsible for most DNA damage-induced mutations. The mechanisms of sequential DNA polymerase switches in vivo remain unclear. The major replicative DNA polymerase δ (pol δ) shares two accessory subunits, called Pol31/Pol32 in yeast, with pol ζ. Inclusion of Pol31/Pol32 in the pol δ/pol ζ holoenzymes requires a [4Fe–4S] cluster in C-termini of the catalytic subunits. Disruption of this cluster in Pol ζ or deletion of POL32 attenuates induced mutagenesis. Here we describe a novel mutation affecting the catalytic subunit of pol ζ, rev3ΔC, which provides insight into the regulation of pol switches. Strains with Rev3ΔC, lacking the entire C-terminal domain and therefore the platform for Pol31/Pol32 binding, are partially proficient in Pol32-dependent UV-induced mutagenesis. This suggests an additional role of Pol32 in TLS, beyond being a pol ζ subunit, related to pol δ. In search for members of this regulatory pathway, we examined the effects of Maintenance of Genome Stability 1 (Mgs1) protein on mutagenesis in the absence of Rev3–Pol31/Pol32 interaction. Mgs1 may compete with Pol32 for binding to PCNA. Mgs1 overproduction suppresses induced mutagenesis, but had no effect on UV-mutagenesis in the rev3ΔC strain, suggesting that Mgs1 exerts its inhibitory effect by acting specifically on Pol32 bound to pol ζ. The evidence for differential regulation of Pol32 in pol δ and pol ζ emphasizes the complexity of polymerase switches.     

RecFOR proteins are essential for Pol V-mediated translesion synthesis and mutagenesis

When the replication fork moves through the template DNA containing lesions, daughter-strand gaps are formed opposite lesion sites. These gaps are subsequently filled-in either by translesion synthesis (TLS) or by homologous recombination. RecA filaments formed within these gaps are key intermediates for both of the gap-filling pathways. For instance, Pol V, the major lesion bypass polymerase in Escherichia coli, requires a functional interaction with the tip of the RecA filament. Here, we show that all three recombination mediator proteins RecFOR are needed to build a functionally competent RecA filament that supports efficient Pol V-mediated TLS in the presence of ssDNA-binding protein (SSB). A positive contribution of RecF protein to Pol V lesion bypass is demonstrated. When Pol III and Pol V are both present, Pol III imparts a negative effect on Pol V-mediated lesion bypass that is counteracted by the combined action of RecFOR and SSB. Mutations in recF, recO or recR gene abolish induced mutagenesis in E. coli.     

Inactivation of the 3'-5' exonuclease of the replicative T4 DNA polymerase allows translesion DNA synthesis at an abasic site

Here, we have investigated the consequences of the loss of proof-reading exonuclease function on the ability of the replicative T4 DNA polymerase (gp43) to elongate past a single abasic site located on model DNA substrates. Our results show that wild-type T4 DNA polymerase stopped at the base preceding the lesion on two linear substrates having different sequences, whereas the gp43 D219A exonuclease-deficient mutant was capable of efficient bypass when replicating the same substrates. The structure of the DNA template did not influence the behavior of the exonuclease-proficient or deficient T4 DNA polymerases. In fact, when replicating a damaged "minicircle" DNA substrate constructed by circularizing one of the linear DNA, elongation by wild-type enzyme was still completely blocked by the abasic site, while the D219A mutant was capable of bypass. During DNA replication, the T4 DNA polymerase associates with accessory factors whose combined action increases the polymerase-binding capacity and processivity, and could modulate the behavior of the enzyme towards an abasic site. We thus performed experiments measuring the ability of wild-type and exonuclease-deficient T4 DNA polymerases, in conjunction with these replicative accessory proteins, to perform translesion DNA replication on linear or circular damaged DNA substrates. We found no evidence of either stimulation or inhibition of the bypass activities of the wild-type and exonuclease-deficient forms of T4 DNA polymerase following addition of the accessory factors, indicating that the presence or absence of the proof-reading activity is the major determinant in dictating translesion synthesis of an abasic site by T4 DNA polymerase.     

DNA polymerase δ and ζ switch by sharing accessory subunits of DNA polymerase δ

Translesion DNA synthesis is an important branch of the DNA damage tolerance pathway that assures genomic integrity of living organisms. The mechanisms of DNA polymerase (Pol) switches during lesion bypass are not known. Here, we show that the C-terminal domain of the Pol ζ catalytic subunit interacts with accessory subunits of replicative DNA Pol δ. We also show that, unlike other members of the human B-family of DNA polymerases, the highly conserved and similar C-terminal domains of Pol δ and Pol ζ contain a [4Fe-4S] cluster coordinated by four cysteines. Amino acid changes in Pol ζ that prevent the assembly of the [4Fe-4S] cluster abrogate Pol ζ function in UV mutagenesis. On the basis of these data, we propose that Pol switches at replication-blocking lesions occur by the exchange of the Pol δ and Pol ζ catalytic subunits on a preassembled complex of accessory proteins retained on DNA during translesion DNA synthesis.     

All three SOS-inducible DNA polymerases (Pol II, Pol IV and Pol V) are involved in induced mutagenesis

Most organisms contain several members of a recently discovered class of DNA polymerases (umuC/dinB superfamily) potentially involved in replication of damaged DNA. In Escherichia coli, only Pol V (umuDC) was known to be essential for base substitution mutagenesis induced by UV light or abasic sites. Here we show that, depending upon the nature of the DNA damage and its sequence context, the two additional SOS-inducible DNA polymerases, Pol II (polB) and Pol IV (dinB), are also involved in error-free and mutagenic translesion synthesis (TLS). For example, bypass of N:-2-acetylaminofluorene (AAF) guanine adducts located within the NAR:I mutation hot spot requires Pol II for -2 frameshifts but Pol V for error-free TLS. On the other hand, error-free and -1 frameshift TLS at a benzo(a)pyrene adduct requires both Pol IV and Pol V. Therefore, in response to the vast diversity of existing DNA damage, the cell uses a pool of 'translesional' DNA polymerases in order to bypass the various DNA lesions.     

NGS-based analysis of base-substitution signatures created by yeast DNA polymerase eta and zeta on undamaged and abasic DNA templates in vitro

Translesion synthesis (TLS) is the mechanism in which DNA polymerases (TLS polymerases) bypass unrepaired template damage with high error rates. DNA polymerase η and ζ (Polη and Polζ) are major TLS polymerases that are conserved from yeast to humans. In this study, we quantified frequencies of base-substitutions by yeast Polη and Polζ on undamaged and abasic templates in vitro. For accurate quantification, we used a next generation sequencing (NGS)-based method where DNA products were directly analyzed by parallel sequencing. On undamaged templates, Polη and Polζ showed distinct base-substitution profiles, and the substitution frequencies were differently influenced by the template sequence. The base-substitution frequencies were influenced mainly by the adjacent bases both upstream and downstream of the substitution sites. Thus we present the base-substitution signatures of these polymerases in a three-base format. On templates containing abasic sites, Polη created deletions at the lesion in more than 50% of the TLS products, but the formation of the deletions was suppressed by the presence of Polζ. Polζ and Polη cooperatively facilitated the TLS reaction over an abasic site in vitro, suggesting that these two polymerases can cooperate in efficient and high fidelity TLS.     

Pol III proofreading activity prevents lesion bypass as evidenced by its molecular signature within E.coli cells

Replication of genomes that contain blocking DNA lesions entails the transient replacement of the replicative DNA polymerase (Pol) by a polymerase specialized in lesion bypass. Here, we isolate and visualize at nucleotide resolution level, replication intermediates formed during lesion bypass of a single N-2-acetylaminofluorene-guanine adduct (G-AAF) in vivo. In a wild-type strain, a ladder of replication intermediates mapping from one to four nucleotides upstream of the lesion site, can be observed. In proofreading-deficient strains (mutD5 or dnaQ49), these replication intermediates disappear, thus assigning the degradation ladder to the polymerase-associated exonuclease activity. Moreover, in mutD5, a new band corresponding to the insertion of a nucleotide opposite to the lesion site is observed, suggesting that the polymerase and exonuclease activities of native Pol III enter a futile insertion-excision cycle that prevents translesion synthesis. The bypass of the G-AAF adduct located within the NarI sequence context requires the induction of the SOS response and involves either Pol V or Pol II in an error-free or a frameshift pathway, respectively. In the frameshift mutation pathway, inactivation of the proofreading activity obviates the need for SOS induction but nonetheless necessitates a functional polB gene, suggesting that, although proofreading-deficient Pol III incorporates a nucleotide opposite G-AAF, further extension still requires Pol II. These data are corroborated using a colony-based bypass assay.     

Accessory proteins assist exonuclease-deficient bacteriophage T4 DNA polymerase in replicating past an abasic site

Replicative DNA polymerases, such as T4 polymerase, possess both elongation and 3'-5' exonuclease proofreading catalytic activities. They arrest at the base preceding DNA damage on the coding DNA strand and specialized DNA polymerases have evolved to replicate across the lesion by a process known as TLS (translesion DNA synthesis). TLS is considered to take place in two steps that often require different enzymes, insertion of a nucleotide opposite the damaged template base followed by extension from the inserted nucleotide. We and others have observed that inactivation of the 3'-5' exonuclease function of T4 polymerase enables TLS across a single site-specific abasic [AP (apurinic/apyrimidinic)] lesion. In the present study we report a role for auxiliary replicative factors in this reaction. When replication is performed with a large excess of DNA template over DNA polymerase in the absence of auxiliary factors, the exo- polymerase (T4 DNA polymerase deficient in the 3'-5' exonuclease activity) inserts one nucleotide opposite the AP site but does not extend past the lesion. Addition of the clamp processivity factor and the clamp loader complex restores primer extension across an AP lesion on a circular AP-containing DNA substrate by the exo- polymerase, but has no effect on the wild-type enzyme. Hence T4 DNA polymerase exhibits a variety of responses to DNA damage. It can behave as a replicative polymerase or (in the absence of proofreading activity) as a specialized DNA polymerase and carry out TLS. As a specialized polymerase it can function either as an inserter or (with the help of accessory proteins) as an extender. The capacity to separate these distinct functions in a single DNA polymerase provides insight into the biochemical requirements for translesion DNA synthesis.     

Crosstalk between replicative and translesional DNA polymerases: PDIP38 interacts directly with Polη

Replicative DNA polymerases duplicate genomes in a very efficient and accurate mode. However their progression can be blocked by DNA lesions since they are unable to accommodate bulky damaged bases in their active site. In response to replication blockage, monoubiquitination of PCNA promotes the switch between replicative and specialized polymerases proficient to overcome the obstacle. In this study, we characterize novel connections between proteins involved in replication and TransLesion Synthesis (TLS). We demonstrate that PDIP38 (Polδ interacting protein of 38 kDa) directly interacts with the TLS polymerase Polη. Interestingly, the region of Polη interacting with PDIP38 is found to be located within the ubiquitin-binding zinc finger domain (UBZ) of Polη. We show that the depletion of PDIP38 increases the number of cells with Polη foci in the absence of DNA damage and diminishes cell survival after UV irradiation. In addition, PDIP38 is able to interact directly not only with Polη but also with the specialized polymerases Rev1 and Polζ (via Rev7). We thus suggest that PDIP38 serves as a mediator protein helping TLS Pols to transiently replace replicative polymerases at damaged sites.