Protein cell surface display in Gram-positive bacteria: from single protein to macromolecular protein structure

In the course of evolution, Gram-positive bacteria, defined here as prokaryotes from the domain Bacteria with a cell envelope composed of one biological membrane (monodermita) and a cell wall composed at least of peptidoglycan and covalently linked teichoic acids, have developed several mechanisms permitting to a cytoplasmic synthesized protein to be present on the bacterial cell surface. Four major types of cell surface displayed proteins are currently recognized: (i) transmembrane proteins, (ii) lipoproteins, (iii) LPXTG-like proteins and (iv) cell wall binding proteins. The subset of proteins exposed on the bacterial cell surface, and thus interacting with extracellular milieu, constitutes the surfaceome. Here, we review exhaustively the current molecular mechanisms involved in protein attachment within the cell envelope of Gram-positive bacteria, from single protein to macromolecular protein structure.     

Protein clefts in molecular recognition and function.

One of the primary factors determining how proteins interact with other molecules is the size of clefts in the protein's surface. In enzymes, for example, the active site is often characterized by a particularly large and deep cleft, while interactions between the molecules of a protein dimer tend to involve approximately planar surfaces. Here we present an analysis of how cleft volumes in proteins relate to their molecular interactions and functions. Three separate datasets are used, representing enzyme-ligand binding, protein-protein dimerization and antibody-antigen complexes. We find that, in single-chain enzymes, the ligand is bound in the largest cleft in over 83% of the proteins. Usually the largest cleft is considerably larger than the others, suggesting that size is a functional requirement. Thus, in many cases, the likely active sites of an enzyme can be identified using purely geometrical criteria alone. In other cases, where there is no predominantly large cleft, chemical interactions are required for pinpointing the correct location. In antibody-antigen interactions the antibody usually presents a large cleft for antigen binding. In contrast, protein-protein interactions in homodimers are characterized by approximately planar interfaces with several clefts involved. However, the largest cleft in each subunit still tends to be involved.     

Protein tyrosine phosphatases: from structure to function

In the past few years, a diverse family of receptor-like and nontransmembrane protein tyrosine phosphatases (PTPases) have been identified and characterized at the level of primary structure. Progress is now being made towards defining physiological processes in which the activity of PTPases is important. One thing seems clear: the PTPases cannot be regarded simply as antagonists of the protein tyrosine kinases (PTKs)--rather, they have the potential to act both positively and negatively in mediating cellular signalling responses.     

Protein structure: discovering selective protein kinase inhibitors

A plethora of important targets for therapeutic intervention occurs in the protein kinase superfamily, one of the most thoroughly investigated groups of drug targets. Kinases have a deep hydrophobic ATP binding site that has been successfully exploited with the discovery of potent ATP-competitive drugs. However, most features of this pocket are well conserved in all protein kinases, which explains why kinase inhibitors typically exhibit a fairly indiscriminate spectrum of activity. Crystal structures of various protein kinases bound to their ligands are described, which begin to explain the observed selectivity profiles of kinase inhibitors. The insights gained from these structures suggest several approaches to improve inhibitor specificity and these approaches are summarized. The exciting potential of new high-throughput methods in structure determination that enable the systematic atomic-resolution investigation of large numbers of inhibitors bound to their various kinase targets will be discussed.     

Toward intrinsically fluorescent proteomimetics: fluorescent probe response to alpha helix structure of poly-gamma-benzyl-L-glutamate

A fluorescent probe (1), developed for recognition of alpha helical secondary structure, shows a large fluorescence change upon titration with the synthetic protein PBLG. Compared to fluorophores of similar size and shape, 1 displayed the smallest dissociation constant (K(D)=80microM) when titrated with PBLG. These preliminary studies are directed toward developing small molecule proteomimetics that have intrinsic fluorescence and are specific for helical-protein binding-sites.     

SRP-mediated protein targeting: structure and function revisited

The signal recognition particle (SRP) and its membrane-bound receptor (SR) deliver membrane proteins and secretory proteins to the translocation channel in the plasma membrane (or the endoplasmic reticulum). The general outline of the SRP pathway is conserved in all three kingdoms of life. During the past decade, structure determination together with functional studies has brought our understanding of the SRP-mediated protein transport to an almost molecular level. An impressive amount of new information especially on the prokaryotic SRP is integrated into the current picture of the SRP pathway.     

Protein phosphatases in chromatin structure and function

Chromatin structure and dynamics are highly controlled and regulated processes that play an essential role in many aspects of cell biology. The chromatin transition stages and the factors that control this process are regulated by post-translation modifications, including phosphorylation. While the role of protein kinases in chromatin dynamics has been quite well studied, the nature and regulation of the counteracting phosphatases represent an emerging field but are still at their infancy. In this review we summarize the current literature on phosphatases involved in the regulation of chromatin structure and dynamics, with emphases on the major knowledge gaps that should require attention and more investigation.     

Protein SUMOylation in spine structure and function

The active regulation of spine structure and function is of fundamental importance for information storage in the brain. Many proteins involved in spine development and activity-dependent remodelling are potential or validated substrates for modification by the Small Ubiquitin-like Modifier (SUMO). The functional consequences of neuronal protein SUMOylation appear diverse and, in many cases, have not yet been determined. However, for several proteins SUMOylation has been shown to be a key regulator, which has a profound impact on spine dynamics and protein trafficking and function. Here we provide an overview of neuronal SUMOylation and discuss how greater understanding of this relatively recently discovered posttranslational modification will provide insight into the complexity of protein interactions that control synaptic activity and dysfunction.     

Protein structure and function at low temperatures

Proteins represent the major components in the living cell that provide the whole repertoire of constituents of cellular organization and metabolism. In the process of evolution, adaptation to extreme conditions mainly referred to temperature, pH and low water activity. With respect to life at low temperatures, effects on protein structure, protein stability and protein folding need consideration. The sequences and topologies of proteins from psychrophilic, mesophilic and thermophilic organisms are found to be highly homologous. Commonly, adaptive changes refer to multiple alterations of the amino acid sequence, which presently cannot be correlated with specific changes of structure and stability; so far it has not been possible to attribute specific increments in the free energy of stabilization to well-defined amino-acid exchanges in an unambiguous way. The stability of proteins is limited at high and low temperatures. Their expression and self-organization may be accomplished under conditions strongly deviating from optimum growth conditions. Molecular adaptation to extremes of temperature seems to be accompanied by a flattening of the temperature profile of the free energy of stabilization. In principle, the free energy of stabilization of proteins is small compared to the total molecular energy. As a consequence, molecular adaptation to extremes of physical conditions only requires marginal alterations of the intermolecular interactions and packing density. Careful statistical and structural analyses indicate that altering the number of ion pairs and hydrophobic interactions allows the flexibility of proteins to be adjusted so that full catalytic function is maintained at varying temperatures.     

Protein function from sequence and structure data

With the large amount of genomics and proteomics data that we are confronted with, computational support for the elucidation of protein function becomes more and more pressing. Many different kinds of biological data harbour signals of protein function, but these signals are often concealed. Computational methods that use protein sequence and structure data can be used for discovering these signals. They provide information that can substantially speed up experimental function elucidation. In this review we concentrate on such methods.     

Protein structure and function by the sea

A report on the 27th Annual Lorne Conference on Protein Structure and Function, Lorne, Australia, 9-13 February 2002.     

Protein mechanics: a route from structure to function

In order to better understand the mechanical properties of proteins, we have developed simulation tools which enable these properties to be analysed on a residue-by-residue basis. Although these calculations are relatively expensive with all-atom protein models, good results can be obtained much faster using coarse-grained approaches. The results show that proteins are surprisingly heterogeneous from a mechanical point of view and that functionally important residues often exhibit unusual mechanical behaviour. This finding offers a novel means for detecting functional sites and also potentially provides a route for understanding the links between structure and function in more general terms.     

Protein mechanics: a route from structure to function

In order to better understand the mechanical properties of proteins, we have developed simulation tools which enable these properties to be analysed on a residue-by-residue basis. Although these calculations are relatively expensive with all-atom protein models, good results can be obtained much faster using coarse-grained approaches. The results show that proteins are surprisingly heterogeneous from a mechanical point of view and that functionally important residues often exhibit unusual mechanical behaviour. This finding offers a novel means for detecting functional sites and also potentially provides a route for understanding the links between structure and function in more general terms.     

Protein recognition by cell surface receptors: physiological receptors versus virus interactions

Protein-protein recognition is a major kind of receptor-ligand interaction: a living cell receives external signals to adapt to the environment through cell surface receptors. On opposing cell surfaces, such recognition bears distinct features: it is a multivalent, reversible and avidity-driven process. The affinity between each individual contacting pair is low. Viruses might take advantage of this low affinity to invade a host cell by evolving a stronger binding affinity to the surface receptors than that associated with physiological ligands. Structural data appear to support this notion.     

Protein structure to function via dynamics

Protein folding, binding, catalytic activity and molecular recognition all involve molecular movements, with varying extents. The molecular movements are brought upon via flexible regions. Stemming from sequence, a fine tuning of electrostatic and hydrophobic properties of the protein fold determine flexible and rigid regions. Studies show flexible regions usually lack electrostatic interactions, such as salt-bridges and hydrogen-bonds, while the rigid regions often have larger number of such electrostatic interactions. Protein flexible regions are not simply an outcome of looser packing or instability, rather they are evolutionally selected. In this review article we highlight the significance of protein flexibilities in folding, binding and function, and their structural and thermodynamic determinants. Our electrostatic calculations and molecular dynamic simulations on an antibody-antigen complex further illustrate the importance of protein flexibilities in binding and function.