Regulation of angiogenesis by extracellular matrix

During angiogenesis, endothelial cell growth, migration, and tube formation are regulated by pro- and anti-angiogenic factors, matrix-degrading proteases, and cell-extracellular matrix interactions. Temporal and spatial regulation of extracellular matrix remodeling events allows for local changes in net matrix deposition or degradation, which in turn contributes to control of cell growth, migration, and differentiation during different stages of angiogenesis. Remodeling of the extracellular matrix can have either pro- or anti-angiogenic effects. Extracellular matrix remodeling by proteases promotes cell migration, a critical event in the formation of new vessels. Matrix-bound growth factors released by proteases and/or by angiogenic factors promote angiogenesis by enhancing endothelial migration and growth. Extracellular matrix molecules, such as thrombospondin-1 and -2, and proteolytic fragments of matrix molecules, such as endostatin, can exert anti-angiogenic effects by inhibiting endothelial cell proliferation, migration and tube formation. In contrast, other matrix molecules promote endothelial cell growth and morphogenesis, and/or stabilize nascent blood vessels. Hence, extracellular matrix molecules and extracellular matrix remodelling events play a key role in regulating angiogenesis.     

Signal transduction by integrin receptors for extracellular matrix: cooperative processing of extracellular information.

Adhesion receptors allow cells to interact with a dynamic and information-rich environment of extracellular matrix molecules. The integrin family of adhesion receptors transduces signals from the extracellular matrix that regulate growth, gene expression and differentiation, as well as cell shape, motility and cytoskeletal architecture. Recent data support the hypothesis that integrins transduce signals cooperatively with other classes of adhesion receptors or with growth factor receptors. Furthermore, the ability of integrins to interact with the cytoskeleton appears to be fundamental to their mechanism for signal transduction.     

Regulation of fibronectin, integrin and cytoskeleton expression in differentiating adipocytes: inhibition by extracellular matrix and polylysine

The differentiation of 3T3 preadipocytes into adipocytes is characterized by major changes in cell morphology from a fibroblastic to a rounded shape and by the induction of gene expression related to lipid metabolism. We have studied the synthesis and mRNA levels of proteins involved in the formation of cell-matrix contacts and in defining cell shape to determine the role and molecular basis of these morphological changes during adipose conversion. When confluent preadipocyte cultures were stimulated with adipogenic medium there was a gradual decrease in the expression of fibronectin, beta-integrin, actin and in the microfilament-associated proteins vinculin, alpha-actinin and tropomyosin. The changes in extracellular matrix and cytoskeletal mRNA levels were apparent before the accumulation of glycerophosphate dehydrogenase (GPD) mRNA and continued during the massive increase in GPD mRNA level. The culturing of preadipocytes on an extracellular matrix deposited on the dish by corneal endothelial cells, or on substrata coated with polylysine, prevented the morphological changes, the decrease in the level of assembled actin, the accumulation of lipid and the shifts in the expression of integrin, cytoskeletal proteins and GPD. In cells cultured on malleable hydrated collagen gels, adipocyte differentiation proceeded at normal rates. The results suggest that the regulated expression of proteins involved in the formation of the transmembrane linkage between the extracellular matrix and the microfilaments are programmed regulatory events that affect cell adhesion and thereby cell shape during adipocyte differentiation.     

The matrix reorganized: extracellular matrix remodeling and integrin signaling

Via integrins, cells can sense dimensionality and other physical and biochemical properties of the extracellular matrix (ECM). Cells respond differently to two-dimensional substrates and three-dimensional environments, activating distinct signaling pathways for each. Direct integrin signaling and indirect integrin modulation of growth factor and other intracellular signaling pathways regulate ECM remodeling and control subsequent cell behavior and tissue organization. ECM remodeling is critical for many developmental processes, and remodeled ECM contributes to tumorigenesis. These recent advances in the field provide new insights and raise new questions about the mechanisms of ECM synthesis and proteolytic degradation, as well as the roles of integrins and tension in ECM remodeling.     

Prolidase activity in fibroblasts is regulated by interaction of extracellular matrix with cell surface integrin receptors

Prolidase (EC 3.4.13.9) is a ubiquitously distributed imidodipeptidase that catalyzes the hydrolysis of C-terminal proline or hydroxyproline containing dipeptides. The enzyme plays an important role in the recycling of proline for collagen synthesis and cell growth. An increase in enzyme activity is correlated with increased rates of collagen turnover indicative of extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, but the mechanism linking prolidase activity and ECM is poorly understood. Thus, the effect of ECM-cell interaction on intracellular prolidase activity is of special interest. In cultured human skin fibroblasts, the interaction with ECM and, more specifically, type I collagen mediated by the β₁ integrin receptor regulates cellular prolidase activity. Supporting evidence comes from the following observations: 1) in sparse cells with a low amount of ECM collagen or in confluent cells in which ECM collagen was removed by collagenase (but not by trypsin or elastase) treatment, prolidase activity was decreased; 2) this effect was reversed by the addition of type I collagen or β₁ integrin antibody (agonist for β₁ integrin receptor); 3) sparse cells (with typically low prolidase activity) showed increased prolidase activity when grown on plates coated with type I collagen or on type IV collagen and laminin, constituents of basement membrane; 4) the relative differences in prolidase activity due to collagenase treatment and subsequent recovery of the activity by β₁ integrin antibody or type I collagen treatment were accompanied by parallel differences in the amount of the enzyme protein recovered from these cells, as shown by Western immunoblot analysis. Thus, we conclude that prolidase activity responded to ECM metabolism (tissue remodeling) through signals mediated by the integrin receptor. J. Cell. Biochem. 67:166–175, 1997. Published 1997 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Serine phosphorylation of the integrin beta4 subunit is necessary for epidermal growth factor receptor induced hemidesmosome disruption

Hemidesmosomes (HDs) are multiprotein adhesion complexes that promote attachment of epithelial cells to the basement membrane. The binding of alpha6beta4 to plectin plays a central role in their assembly. We have defined three regions on beta4 that together harbor all the serine and threonine phosphorylation sites and show that three serines (S1356, S1360, and S1364), previously implicated in HD regulation, prevent the interaction of beta4 with the plectin actin-binding domain when phosphorylated. We have also established that epidermal growth factor receptor activation, which is known to function upstream of HD disassembly, results in the phosphorylation of only one or more of these three residues and the partial disassembly of HDs in keratinocytes. Additionally, we show that S1360 and S1364 of beta4 are the only residues phosphorylated by PKC and PKA in cells, respectively. Taken together, our studies indicate that multiple kinases act in concert to breakdown the structural integrity of HDs in keratinocytes, which is primarily achieved through the phosphorylation of S1356, S1360, and S1364 on the beta4 subunit.     

Regulation of macrophage ApoE expression and processing by extracellular matrix

Macrophage-derived apoE in the vessel wall has important effects on atherogenesis in vivo, making it important to understand factors that regulate its expression. Vessel wall macrophages are embedded in an extracellular matrix produced largely by arterial smooth muscle cells and endothelial cells. In this series of studies, we evaluated the influence of extracellular matrix on macrophage apoE expression. Subendothelial matrix, fibronectin, or collagen I stimulated macrophage apoE gene expression and apoE synthesis. Adhesion of macrophages to a polylysine substrate had no effect. An increase in apoE synthesis after plating on fibronectin could be observed by 2 h and was inhibited by blocking antibodies to the alpha(5)beta(1) integrin receptor for fibronectin. Fibronectin also regulated the post-translational processing of newly synthesized macrophage apoE by inhibiting its degradation. The increment in apoE resulting from suppressed degradation was retained in the cell-fibronectin monolayer in a pool that was resistant to release by exogenous high density lipoprotein subfraction 3. These observations establish a new pathway for the regulation of macrophage apoE expression in the vessel wall. The composition of the extracellular matrix changes after vessel wall injury and in response to locally produced cytokines and growth factors. The evolving composition of this matrix will, therefore, be important for regulating apoE expression and processing by vessel wall macrophages.     

Regulation of concanavalin A agglutination by the extracellular matrix

The agglutinability of rat C₆ glioma cells by concanavalin A (Con A) depends upon cell density. From sparse density to near confluency agglutinability increases as cell density rises. Both the half-maximal concentration and the maximum amplitude of agglutination by Con A are functions of cell density, but are separate cell parameters differing in the extent to which they are affected by density and the point at which they become insensitive to further density increases. Both trypsin and EDTA reduce cell agglutinability. The similarity in recovery kinetics between low density cells and cells dissociated with EDTA or trypsin suggests that low density cells may lose the same surface agglutination component(s) removed by trypsin and EDTA. Density-dependent regulation of Con A agglutinability is anchorage dependent; cells grown in suspension display no such phenomenon. The cooperative cell regulation of agglutinability is mediated by the extracellular matrix, or micro-exudate. The matrix contains two activities: low density cultures produce a matrix inhibitor of Con A agglutinability, while high density cultures produce a matrix promotor.     

Priming of human neutrophils is necessary for their activation by extracellular DNA

Extracellular plasma DNA is thought to act as a damage-associated molecular pattern causing activation of immune cells. However, purified preparations of mitochondrial and nuclear DNA were unable to induce neutrophil activation in vitro. Thus, we examined whether granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) acting as a neutrophil priming agent can promote the activation of neutrophils by different types of extracellular DNA. GM-CSF pretreatment greatly increased p38 MAPK phosphorylation and promoted CD11b/CD66b expression in human neutrophils treated with mitochondrial and, to a lesser extent, with nuclear DNA. Our experiments clearly indicate that GM-CSFinduced priming of human neutrophils is necessary for their subsequent activation by extracellular DNA.     

Mixed extracellular matrix ligands synergistically modulate integrin adhesion and signaling

Cell adhesion to extracellular matrix (ECM) components through cell-surface integrin receptors is essential to the formation, maintenance and repair of numerous tissues, and therefore represents a central theme in the design of bioactive materials that successfully interface with the body. While the adhesive responses associated with a single ligand have been extensively analyzed, the effects of multiple integrin subtypes binding to multivalent ECM signals remain poorly understood. In the present study, we generated a high throughput platform of non-adhesive surfaces presenting well-defined, independent densities of two integrin-specific engineered ligands for the type I collagen (COL-I) receptor alpha(2)beta(1) and the fibronectin (FN) receptor alpha(5)beta(1) to evaluate the effects of integrin cross-talk on adhesive responses. Engineered surfaces displayed ligand density-dependent adhesive effects, and mixed ligand surfaces significantly enhanced cell adhesion strength and focal adhesion assembly compared to single FN and COL-I ligand surfaces. Moreover, surfaces presenting mixed COL-I/FN ligands synergistically enhanced FAK activation compared to the single ligand substrates. The enhanced adhesive activities of the mixed ligand surfaces also promoted elevated proliferation rates. Our results demonstrate interplay between multivalent ECM ligands in adhesive responses and downstream cellular signaling.     

Regulation of plasminogen activation by components of the extracellular matrix

The kinetics of activation of Glu-plasminogen (Glu-Pg) and Lys77-Pg by two-chain recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA) were determined in the presence of isolated protein components of the extracellular matrix (ECM) and compared to activation in the presence of fibrinogen and fibrinogen fragments and in the absence of added protein. Several ECM protein components were as effective as fibrinogen fragments at stimulating Pg activation. Stimulation of Glu-Pg activation resulted from both a decrease in Km and an increase in Vmax, whereas stimulation of Lys77-Pg was due primarily to increases in Vmax. The most effective stimulators of activation were basement membrane type IV collagen and gelatin which resulted in a 21- and 55-fold increase, respectively, in the kcat/Km of Glu-Pg (relative to a 10-fold increase observed with fibrinogen fragments). Amidolytic activity of t-PA was also enhanced up to 12-fold by ECM proteins. However, plasmin amidolytic activity was unaffected by the presence of added proteins. These data suggest that several ECM-associated proteins can enhanced the activation of Pg in the absence of fibrin.     

Regulation of cancer invasiveness by the physical extracellular matrix environment

Long-term clinical outcomes are dependent on whether carcinoma cells leave the primary tumor site and invade through adjacent tissue. Recent evidence links tissue rigidity to alterations in cancer cell phenotype and tumor progression. We found that rigid extracellular matrix (ECM) substrates promote invasiveness of tumor cells via increased activity of invadopodia, subcellular protrusions with associated ECM-degrading proteinases. Although the subcellular mechanism by which substrate rigidity promotes invadopodia function remains to be determined, force sensing does appear to occur through myosin-based contractility and the mechanosensing proteins FAK and p130^Cas. In addition to rigidity, a number of ECM characteristics may regulate the ability of cells to invade through tissues, including matrix density and crosslinking. 3-D biological hydrogels based on type I collagen and reconstituted basement membrane are commonly used to study invasive behavior; however, these models lack some of the tissue-specific properties found in vivo. Thus, new in vitro organotypic and synthetic polymer ECM substrate models will be useful to either mimic the properties of specific ECM microenvironments encountered by invading cancer cells or to manipulate ECM substrate properties and independently test the role of rigidity, integrin ligands, pore size and proteolytic activity in cancer invasion of various tissues.Key words: cancer, invasion, invadopodia, rigidity, mechanotransduction, microenvironmentIn multicellular organisms, cells must sense and respond to multiple cues for proper functioning within tissues. Although most experimental research has focused on the regulation of cellular processes by external chemical signals, there is increasing recognition that mechanical forces also regulate critical cellular functions. Indeed, rigidity of the extracellular environment has been shown to regulate such diverse processes as muscle cell differentiation, stem cell lineage fate, breast epithelial signaling and phenotype, and fibroblast motility.^1–5In breast cancer, accumulating evidence suggests a role for tissue rigidity in promoting both the formation and invasiveness of tumors. Mammographic density of breast tissue has been correlated with increased cancer risk and included in models to predict the likelihood of in situ and invasive breast cancers.⁶ Histologically, dense breast tissue has increased stromal collagen content and in vitro analyses have shown that cancerous breast tissue is much stiffer than normal tissue (as represented by values for the elastic or Young''s moduli).^3,7 In addition, experimentally increased expression of collagen fibrils in a mouse mammary model of spontaneous breast cancer was recently shown to promote tumor formation, invasion and metastasis.⁸ Therefore, both clinical and animal data suggest a correlation between tissue density and cancer aggressiveness, and mechanical factors appear likely to play a role in this process.⁹A well-established mechanism by which extracellular matrix (ECM) rigidity signals can drive phenotypic transformations is through mechano-signal transduction (mechanotransduction) pathways in which external forces are transmitted via integrin receptors at linear focal adhesion structures to cytoskeletal and signaling proteins inside the cell. Actomyosin contractility leads to stretching and activation of proteins such as talin, p130^Cas and potentially focal adhesion kinase (FAK).^10–12 For example, stem cell lineage was found to be dependent on formation of cellular focal adhesions and actomyosin contractility in response to substrate tensile properties.² Mammary epithelial cells grown on compliant matrices will differentiate and polarize to form lactating 3-D structures that resemble in vivo acini but fail to do so on stiff matrices due to increased cytoskeletal contractility.³ Activation of mechanotransduction molecules, such as FAK, Rho and ROCK, are required for the rigidity-induced phenotype changes.^3,5 Using polyacrylamide (PA) gel systems, Yu-li Wang''s group found that rigid substrates induce fibroblast and epithelial cells to migrate away from each other instead of aggregating to form tissue-like structures.¹³ This transformation in phenotype is characteristic of the epithelial to mesenchymal transition and thought to be crucial for tumor cell migration.¹⁴A critical feature of tumor aggressiveness is the ability to invade across tissue boundaries, through degradation of ECM. The subcellular structures responsible for this invasive activity are thought to be invadopodia: actin-rich, finger-like cellular protrusions that proteolytically degrade local ECM. These structures are characteristic of invasive cells and have been implicated in tumor cell metastasis due to their association with ECM degradation.¹⁵ Similar structures, podosomes, are formed in src-transformed cells, as well as normal cells such as osteoclasts and dendritic cells that need to degrade matrix and/or cross tissue boundaries.¹⁶ In addition to mediating ECM degradation, podosomes have been postulated to function as adhesion structures, since well-characterized adhesion proteins localize to podosomes and many podosome-expressing cells no longer express focal adhesions.¹⁷ Furthermore, podosomes have been shown to be essential for chemotactic motility and transendothelial migration, although not for chemokinetic motility.^18,19We recently found that ECM rigidity increases both the number and activity of invadopodia, and this effect was dependent on the cellular contractile machinery (Fig. 1A).²⁰ Consistent with a role for mechanotransduction in this process, we found localization of the active, phosphorylated forms of the mechanosensing proteins FAK and p130^Cas in actively degrading invadopodia and an increase in invadopodia-associated degradation in breast cancer cells overexpressing FAK and p130^Cas. These results suggest that in breast cancer, increases in tissue rigidity may directly lead to increased cellular invasiveness and tumor progression.Open in a separate windowFigure 1Potential rigidity sensing mechanisms by invadopodia. (A) Invadopodia are typically identified by colocalization of fluorescent antibodies for actin and cortactin at puncta that correspond to areas of ECM degradation visualized as dark regions in FITC-labeled fibronectin (Fn) overlaying gelatin. In this case, ECM was layered on top of either soft (storage modulus = 360 Pa) or hard (storage modulus = 3,300 Pa) polyacrylamide gels (PA) to determine if invadopodia activity was regulated by differences in mechanical properties. On hard PA, invasive MCF10ACA1d breast carcinoma cells produced more invadopodia and degraded more ECM than on soft PA. Yellow arrows indicate examples of invadopodia. (B) The localization of rings of the contractile protein myosin IIA (myoIIA) surrounding invadopodia (actin puncta) suggests a role for these structures in mechanosensing by potentially linking invadopodia with the contractile apparatus to detect differences in substrate rigidity. An example ring structure is indicated with a yellow arrow and shown in the zoomed portion of the myosin IIA image, and an example of no or weak localization of myosin IIA with an invadopodium is indicated with the red arrow. (C) Activated forms of FAK and p130^Cas localize to invadopodia and depend on cytoskeletal contractility.²⁰ Rings of myosin IIA also frequently surround invadopodia. These results suggest that invadopodia may act as mechanosensing organelles, either directly through localized mechanoresponsiveness at the invadopodia or through longer-range connections to neighboring or even distant focal adhesions. In either case, traction forces may be generated as a result of changes in cytoskeletal tension in response to ECM properties. Alternatively, invadopodia function could be regulated in the absence of local traction forces, secondary to distant intracellular signaling that leads to alterations in whole cell phenotypic changes. (A and B) are reprinted from Current Biology, Volume 18, Nelson R. Alexander, Kevin M. Branch, Aron Parekh, Emily S. Clark, Izuchukwu C. Iwueke, Scott A. Guelcher and Alissa M. Weaver, Extracellular Matrix Rigidity Promotes Invadopodia Activity, pp. 1295–9, 2008; with permission from Elsevier.The localization of phosphorylated FAK and p130^Cas at invadopodia and the requirement for actomyosin contractility in our study suggests that invadopodia have the potential to act as mechanosensing organelles. This concept is supported by our finding that ∼40% of breast cancer cells cultured on rigid substrates had rings of myosin IIA surrounding invadopodia (Fig. 1B)²⁰ and the recent finding that similar podosome structures can exert local traction forces.²¹ In addition, a few studies have implicated integrin activity in invadopodia function as well as localized β1 and β3 integrins to invadopodia.^22–25 However, whether invadopodia can serve as tension-generating adhesion structures is controversial, in part because of the presence of both focal adhesions and invadopodia in many cancer cells (Fig. 1C).Regulation of invadopodia and podosome function is also not straightforward. Although our data,²⁰ along with results from Collin et al.,²¹ suggests that mechanical tension promotes invadopodia and podosome activity, in some systems podosome formation is promoted by a loss rather than a gain of cytoskeletal tension. That is, local cytoskeletal relaxation has been shown to promote podosome formation coincident with focal adhesion dissolution in both vascular smooth muscle cells treated with phorbol ester²⁶ and neuroblastoma cells.²⁷ A yin-yang activity between focal adhesions and podosomes has been known for many years, whereby activation of src kinase leads to both disassembly of focal adhesions²⁸ and formation of podosomes.²⁹ However, the role of tension in this process is unclear, particularly since activation of src kinase occurs downstream of mechanical stimuli³⁰ and should promote podosome/invadopodia activity, yet loss of tension apparently induces biological activities dependent on src kinase (focal adhesion disassembly and podosome formation).^26,27 For invadopodia, the role of tension is even less clear. Basic characterization studies need to be performed to establish molecular and structural differences between invadopodia and focal adhesions and to measure force profiles at the two structures. Since invadopodia have much smaller diameters compared to podosomes (50–100 nm vs ∼1 µm, respectively),^15,16 the latter task of determining traction forces may be difficult due to resolution limitations in measuring potentially tiny substrate displacements. The standard identification of invadopodia, by association of actin-rich puncta with sites of degradation of fluorescent ECM, adds another technical limitation since the thickness and fluorescence of the ECM matrix used to identify proteolytic activity may hinder visualization of embedded fluorescent beads in the underlying PA gel (displacement of beads is typically used to calculate traction forces).³¹ Thus, an important future direction should be the development of new in vitro experimental systems that have manipulable substrate properties and allow simultaneous identification of subcellular forces and proteolytic activity.The cellular response to rigidity is often characterized using PA gels with tunable stiffness in the range spanning that of normal and cancerous breast tissue (elastic moduli = 100–10,000 Pa).^3,7 PA gels will likely continue to be invaluable tools for understanding cellular responses to rigidity. However, this system is inherently simple and cannot fully replicate cellular events occurring in a complex in vivo ECM microenvironment. Given that invading breast cancer cells are likely to experience different microenvironments as they cross through the basement membrane (BM) and into neighboring collagenous stromal tissue (Fig. 2), biological hydrogels such as reconstituted basement membrane (Matrigel) and type I collagen gels are often utilized to mimic these ECM substrates. However, both of these models lack many of the chemical, physical, and mechanical characteristics of tissues found in vivo and have been recently questioned as suitable models for studying cancer cell invasion.³² Type I collagen gels have a fibrillar architecture but a low density and high porosity³³ and frequently lack crosslinking sites.³⁴ Although Matrigel contains many of the biochemical components of the BM, it is tumor-derived³⁵ and the major component is laminin-1, which is only abundant in fetal tissues.³⁶ By contrast, the major component of normal BM is type IV collagen. In addition, Matrigel is a solubilized preparation that lacks crosslinks³⁷ and a fibrillar component.³⁸ Both sparse collagen gels and Matrigel are quite compliant with Young''s moduli of ∼1,000 and ∼200 Pa, respectively;³ therefore, without further manipulation these substrates lack the rigidity required to mimic tumor-associated ECM.Open in a separate windowFigure 2Navigation of basement membranes and stromal collagen by invading cancer cells. Invasive cancer cells are thought to navigate different tissue microenvironments in the process of invasion. In order for invasion to occur, tumor cells must first breach the basement membrane, a thin and highly crosslinked specialized ECM that requires proteolytic degradation for subsequent transmigration. Once past this barrier, cells must proceed through the neighboring stroma composed of collagenous connective tissue. The meshwork in the stroma is looser and may facilitate diverse migration modes dependent on local microenvironmental conditions and cellular cohesiveness. These modes of migration include a single cell, proteinase-independent amoeboidal phenotype (left) and single cell (middle) and collective (right) proteinase-dependent mesenchymal phenotypes that locally degrade matrix at enzymatically active invadopodia. Note the absence of collagen stroma surrounding and along the migration track of proteolytically active cells. New physiologically relevant models that mimic these interactions in vitro will be useful to elucidate mechanisms of cancer cell migration and invasion in various tissues.In order to invade neighboring stromal tissue, carcinoma cells must first breach the BM, a complex, interwoven meshwork composed of type IV collagen, laminin, nidogen/entactin, and various proteoglycans and glycoproteins.³² The highly ordered and crosslinked type IV collagen network is regarded as the limiting barrier to cancer cell invasion since it forms pores on the order of 100 nm that are too small for passage of cells without proteolytic degradation of the BM.³² In addition to degradation, decreased BM synthesis may contribute to the initial steps of cancer invasion by altering the balance between BM formation and remodeling.³⁹ Once cancer cells cross the BM, they encounter stromal collagen tissue. In tumors, this desmoplastic stroma is frequently fibrotic due to increased ECM deposition and crosslinking by carcinoma-associated fibroblasts.⁹ Although controversial, cancer cells are thought to use a nonproteolytic, amoeboid mode to traverse this connective tissue;⁴⁰ therefore, different modes of migration may be necessary to traverse BM or stromal collagenous matrices (Fig. 2). However, the amoeboid phenotype has been described using either sparse collagen gels without crosslinks⁴¹ or Matrigel.⁴² In vivo, the process of invading through tumor-associated stromal collagen is likely to depend on the pore size, the crosslinking status, and whether cells are migrating collectively or individually.^34,43In light of these concerns and many others, there has been a push for more physiologically relevant in vitro models that represent closer approximations of BM or stromal collagen tissue. Successful models, whether natural or synthetic, must be able to mimic the composition, architecture and mechanical properties of the in vivo environment as well as support cell culture in ex vivo conditions. Natural substrates can be produced by cultured cells, such as the epithelial basement membranes synthesized by MDCK cells.³⁷ Alternatively, organotypic models derived from biological specimens have recently been utilized to study invasion. These materials can be based on processed biological tissue, such as detergent-extracted mouse embryo sections,⁴⁴ homogenized involution matrix,³⁸ and decellularized human dermis,⁴⁵ or on native tissue such as chick chorioallantoic membrane⁴⁶ and explanted peritoneal or mammary tissue.^34,37 In addition, the field of tissue engineering has already provided novel hybrid scaffolds and advanced tissue culturing methods that can be utilized for cancer research.⁴⁷ Biological materials developed for clinical use in tissue reconstruction and regeneration, such as small intestinal submucosa and urinary bladder matrix, are attractive candidates as new in vitro models since they maintain their tissue-like properties and have been extensively characterized.^48,49 These tissue-derived scaffolds are composed of well-defined structural and functional proteins, originally produced by cells in vivo, and maintain their complex 3-D architecture. Thus, such materials can provide an environment that recapitulates the chemical, physical and mechanical properties found in vivo.⁴⁸ In addition, synthetic materials, such as poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels, will likely play a large role in cancer research since they can be designed with defined chemistries to obtain appropriate physical and mechanical properties as well as specific spatial arrangements of biologically relevant moieties on relevant length scales.^33,50 Similarly, engineered adhesive microenvironments created with microfabrication techniques can also be utilized to probe molecular and cellular phenomena.⁵¹ Due to this flexibility in fabrication, these materials are good candidates for novel in vitro models to probe the effects of specific mechanical, topographical and chemical factors on cellular migration and invasion.In summary, the physical microenvironment is increasingly recognized as a major influence on cellular phenotype. Recent data emphasizes the importance of mechanical factors in tumor progression, including cellular invasiveness. Exciting future directions include understanding how stromal and BM environments affect cellular invasiveness at multiple scales, including subcellular and molecular regulation of ECM degradation in response to ECM rigidity and the role of proteinases in crossing diverse tissue barriers. The development of novel model systems with appropriate biological and physical properties will facilitate all of these goals.     

Regulation of rat mammary gene expression by extracellular matrix components

In the mammary gland the induction and maintenance of differentiation are dependent on both lactogenic hormones and the extracellular matrix (ECM). Since mammary epithelial cells differentiate on a basement membrane in vivo we have examined the effects of basement membrane components on the expression of milk protein genes in primary rat mammary cultures. We examined the effects of a basement membrane gel derived from the Englebreth-Holm-Swarm tumor as well as its major component, laminin, on the expression of a group of milk protein genes. We demonstrate that the basement membrane gel induces alpha-casein and alpha-lactalbumin (alpha-LA) accumulation up to 160- and 70-fold, respectively, of that on tissue culture plastic. Laminin, a major component of the basement membrane, also caused significant induction of these same proteins. In order to determine whether these ECM effects occurred at a translational or post-translational level, pulse-chase experiments were performed. These experiments demonstrated that a laminin substratum selectively effects milk protein turnover and secretion. In order to demonstrate whether ECM effects occurred at the level of steady state accumulation of mRNA we performed dot blot and Northern analyses using cloned cDNA probes for alpha-, beta-, and gamma-caseins and alpha-LA. These studies demonstrated that ECM components induced alpha- and beta-caseins up to 10-fold, and alpha-LA up to 3-fold, with no significant effect on gamma-casein. These results demonstrate that milk protein genes are not coordinately regulated by ECM components. Furthermore, since the amount of induction of milk proteins exceeds the amount of induction of mRNAs for these proteins, we conclude that in our system a major effect of ECM components is at the translational and/or post-translational levels. Based on these findings we propose a model in which basement membrane components effect mammary gene expression at multiple levels.     

Regulation of autophagy by extracellular matrix glycoproteins in HeLa cells

Macroautophagy is a major lysosomal degradation pathway for cellular components in eukaryotic cells. Baseline macroautophagy is important for quality control of the cytoplasm in order to avoid the accumulation of cytotoxic products. Its stimulation by various stressful situations, including nutrient starvation, is important in maintaining cell survival. Here we demonstrate that macroautophagy is regulated differently depending on whether HeLa cells adhere to collagen I or collagen IV, proteins typical of connective tissue and basal membrane, respectively. We observed that the basal levels of macroautophagy were higher in cells plated on collagen IV than in cells plated on collagen I or on uncoated substrate. However, the stimulation of macroautophagy by nutrient starvation, as reflected by the buildup of autophagosomes and the increase in the autophagic flux, was higher in cells plated on collagen I than in cells plated on collagen IV. These contrasting results were not due to differences in the starvation-dependent inhibition of mTOR complex 1 signaling. Interestingly, cells plated on collagen IV formed numerous focal adhesions (FAs), whereas fewer FAs were observed in cells plated on the other substrates. This implies that focal adhesion kinase (FAK) was more robustly activated by collagen IV. Silencing the expression of FAK by siRNA in cells plated on collagen IV shifted the autophagic phenotype of these cells to an "uncoated substrate autophagic phenotype" under both basal and starvation-induced conditions. Moreover, cells plated on collagen IV were less dependent on autophagy to survive in the absence of nutrients. We conclude that extracellular matrix components can modulate macroautophagy and mitigate its role in cell survival.     

The extracellular matrix and cytokines regulate microglial integrin expression and activation

Microglia are the primary immune effector cells resident within the CNS, whose activation into migratory, phagocytic cells is associated with increased expression of cell adhesion molecules of the integrin family. To determine which specific factors are important regulators of microglial activation and integrin expression, we have examined the influence of individual cytokines and extracellular matrix (ECM) substrates by quantifying cell surface expression of MHC and individual integrins by flow cytometry. We found that the proinflammatory cytokines TNF and IFN-alpha promoted microglial activation, as assessed by amoeboid morphology and increased expression of MHC class I, and also increased expression of the alpha(4)beta(1) and Mac-1 integrins. In contrast, TGF-beta1 had the opposite effect and was dominant over the other cytokines. Furthermore, the ECM substrates fibronectin and vitronectin, but not laminin, also promoted microglial activation and increased expression of the alpha(4)beta(1), alpha(5)beta(1) and Mac-1 integrins, but significantly, the influence of fibronectin and vitronectin was not diminished by TGF-beta1. Taken together, this work suggests that, in addition to cytokines, the ECM represents an important regulatory influence on microglial activity. Specifically, it implies that increases in the local availability of fibronectin or vitronectin, as a result of blood-brain barrier breakdown or increased expression in different pathological states of the CNS, could induce microglial activation and increased expression of integrins.