Early Mobilization after Myocardial Infarction: a Controlled Study

During the years 1968-71 203 patients with proved myocardial infarction were admitted to the trial. Patients were mobilized either on day 10 (102 patients) or on day 20 (100 patients). All patients were kept in hospital for 30 days in order to ensure a detailed comparison of clinical course and laboratory data. In neither group was there a fatal complication and the differences in clinical outcome or laboratory data were statistically not significant. Half of the patients from each group were re-examined after an average of one-and-a-half years, and again no differences were observed. It is concluded that patients with an uncomplicated myocardial infarction may safely be mobilized after 9 days and discharged after three weeks.     

Isolated Aortocoronary Bypass Operations in Patients Over 70 Years of Age: A Comparison With Results in Patients 50 to 59 Years Old

The early and late morbidity, mortality and beneficial effects of isolated aortocoronary bypass operations in a group of 35 patients 70 years old or older were compared with those factors in patients 50 to 59 years old. The patients in both groups were matched according to the year in which the operation was done and the number of vessels bypassed. Left ventricular function, estimated by the angiographically calculated ejection fraction, was not statistically different in the two groups. Cardiac index, while adequate in both groups, was significantly lower in the older age group. Comparisons were made of “early” events, such as perioperative myocardial infarction, perioperative death and length of post-operative hospital stay; and of “late” events, including myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, congestive heart failure and death, which occurred after patients were discharged from the hospital. The mean length of follow-up of patients was similar in both groups.In comparing early events in the two groups, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction, perioperative mortality or mean length of postoperative hospital stays. With regard to late events, there was no statistically significant difference in the incidences of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris or mortality.     

Late Ventricular Dysrhythmias after Myocardial Infarction

Serious ventricular dysrhythmias occurred in hospital after discharge from a coronary intensive care unit in 11 out of 142 patients with myocardial infarction. Previous rhythm changes, hypotension, and left ventricular failure were common findings; only one of these patients had an uneventful previous course. Four patients were resuscitated and left hospital; six were resuscitated but died at varying periods up to eight days after the event; one patient could not be resuscitated. Recent coronary occlusion or further myocardial infarction was demonstrated in 7 of these 11 patients and presumably accounted for the dysrhythmia.     

血清Trx1、FGL2与急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者预后的关系

摘要 目的：探讨血清硫氧还蛋白1（Trx1）、纤维蛋白原样蛋白2（FGL2）与急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者预后的关系。方法：选择2019年10月至2020年5月我院收治的158例急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者作为观察组,并根据心功能Killip分级分为Ⅱ级组54例、Ⅲ级组57例、Ⅳ级组47例。另选择同期我院收治的102例急性心肌梗死患者作为对照组。入院后采用酶联免疫吸附法（ELISA）检测所有患者血清Trx1、FGL2水平;观察组患者出院后随访2年,并根据是否出现主要不良心血管事件（MACE）将患者分为预后不良组和预后良好组。采用多因素Logistic回归分析影响急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者预后的相关因素,采用受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线评估血清Trx1、FGL2对急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者预后的预测价值。结果：观察组血清FGL2水平明显高于对照组,血清Trx1水平明显低于对照组（P<0.05）;心功能Killip分级Ⅳ级组患者血清Trx1水平明显低于Ⅱ级组、Ⅲ级组（P<0.05）,血清FGL2水平明显高于Ⅱ级组、Ⅲ级组（P<0.05）。预后不良组患者血清Trx1、LVEF均明显低于预后良好组,而年龄、血清FGL2及血尿酸、血肌酐、N末端B型利钠肽原（NT-proBNP）均明显高于预后良好组（P<0.05）,两组心功能Killip分级比例比较差异有统计学意义（P<0.05）。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,年龄（较高）、心功能Killip分级为Ⅳ级、Trx1下降、FGL2升高均是影响急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者预后的危险因素（P<0.05）。ROC曲线结果显示,血清Trx1、FGL2预测急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者预后的曲线下面积分别为0.807、0.811,两者联合检测预测急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者预后的曲线下面积为0.889。结论：急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者血清中Trx1水平降低,FGL2水平升高,且血清Trx1、FGL2水平与患者心功能分级及预后密切相关,可作为评估急性心肌梗死后心力衰竭患者预后的辅助性指标。     

Policy for early discharge after acute myocardial infarction.

Simple criteria were used to select a low-risk group of patients after acute myocardial infarction. The criteria depended on the presence or absence of diabetes, pulmonary oedema, serious rhythm disorders, and recurrent cardiac pain. Patients in the low-risk category with a suitable home environment were discharged from hospital after five to seven days (mean 6.2 days); they constituted 47% of the 267 hospital survivors over 18 months. Mortality in the selected patients was 2.4% at six weeks and 7% at one year. Most complications preventing early discharge were identified on the first day. Provisional selection for a short hospital stay was made after two days, and 76% of those judged suitable at 48 hours remained free of complications. Early selection of a low-risk category is justifiable and of practical value, though subsequent events will delay discharge for some patients. All patients who died in hospital or within two weeks after infarction had developed overt complications by the end of the fourth day. The results suggest that a policy of hospital discharge after four days would be justifiable for a low-risk group selected by the present criteria.     

Assessment of cardiac risk 10 days after uncomplicated myocardial infarction.

A total of 188 patients with uncomplicated acute myocardial infarction (long-term Norris prognostic index 3.2) were rapidly mobilised, underwent a symptom-limited exercise test around the day of discharge from hospital (day 10), and returned to work at a median of six weeks after the acute event. The incidence of cardiac death six months, one year, and three years after infarction was 2.7%, 4.5%, and 7.3% respectively, and the corresponding figures for recurrent heart attacks were 3.4%, 8.2%, and 18.5% respectively. The risk of recurrence of heart attack was predicted by three variables assessed at discharge--namely, a history of classical effort angina (p less than 0.01), radiological heart failure (p less than 0.05), and angina induced by the exercise test (p less than 0.05). The presence of any of these risk factors defined a group of patients with a sevenfold risk of recurrent heart attacks within six months of the initial acute infarct. It is concluded that these risk factors identify a group of patients with a high risk of recurrence early after infarction, in whom vigorous secondary prophylaxis is desirable.     

Prognosis of patients with "chest pain ?cause".

All 662 patients admitted to the two coronary care units in Nottingham during 12 consecutive months were followed up prospectively for one year. At the time of discharge from hospital they were categorised according to set criteria into the following diagnostic groups: definite, probable, or possible myocardial infarction; ischaemia heart disease without infarction; chest pain ?cause; and other diagnoses. Eighty-nine patients (13% of admissions) were categorised as having chest pain ?cause. No deaths occurred among these patients during the observation period, although two were readmitted with myocardial infarction. Patients with chest pain ?cause had few problems during the year after admission, and at the end of that time 75% were in their original employment. Patients admitted with ischaemic heart disease had a similar death rate (between six weeks and one year after admission) to those with myocardial infarction, and only 36% were in their original employment one year after admission. Chest pain ?cause is a clinically useful diagnostic category to which patients may be allocated after only simple investigations.     

急性心肌梗死后血糖变化对预后的影响研究

目的：探讨急性心肌梗死后血糖变化对患者预后的影响。方法：对314例急性心肌梗死患者于入院后第2日早晨测空腹血糖值后,并进行回顾性对比分析。结果：随着血糖水平的逐渐升高,心力衰竭及心源性休克的发生率和病死率逐渐升高（P〈0.05）,严重心律失常的发生率逐渐升高,但差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。结论：急性心肌梗死患者伴应激性血糖升高者,随着血糖水平升高,其心力衰竭及心源性休克的发生率和病死率升高。血糖正常组预后明显好于血糖升高组。     

Cardiac predictors of death after non-cardiac surgery evaluated by intention to treat.

Cardiac risk factors were studied among patients who were admitted to hospital with appendicitis or a fracture of the proximal femur less than one year after being admitted with myocardial infarction. Of 99 patients with myocardial infarction and appendicitis, 87 underwent appendicectomy; and of 221 with myocardial infarction and hip fracture, 179 were operated on. The patients were studied on an intention to treat basis. The mortality within one month was 9% and 16% respectively. A history of congestive heart failure was the dominating risk factor, while ischaemic heart disease (recent myocardial infarction or angina pectoris) had no independent association with mortality. If the ventricular function is known additional preoperative information about the heart is of negligible value when estimating the mortality of non-cardiac surgery.     

Cardiac catheterisation by the Judkins technique as an outpatient procedure.

OBJECTIVE--To assess the safety and cost benefit of left heart catheterisation by a modified Judkins technique performed as a day patient procedure. DESIGN--Review study of case notes of consecutive patients examined by the procedure over three years (January 1984 to December 1986). SETTING--Outpatient referrals in a regional cardiac centre within a district general hospital. PATIENTS--Nine hundred patients aged 18-76 (mean 54) selected at a previous clinic as suitable for the procedure. MAIN RESULTS--Eight hundred and fifty patients (94.4%) were discharged home on the day of the procedure. Forty others (4.4%) could not be discharged owing to complications during or just after the procedure. Of these patients, two died (0.2%), six suffered a myocardial infarction (0.7%), and two had major vascular complications. The remaining 30 patients were admitted because of chest pain without infarction (10 cases), minor vascular incidents (six), haemorrhage at the puncture site (five), arrhythmia (four), pulmonary oedema (three), and contrast reaction (two). Ten patients were admitted for either urgent coronary artery bypass grafting or social reasons. CONCLUSIONS--Cardiac catheterisation is safe as an outpatient procedure in most cases. Beds are spared and roughly 35,000 pounds is saved for every 500 procedures performed.     

Cardiac arrhythmias in myocardial infarction as an extension of lesions to the myocardium and the state of circulatory efficiency

The study involved 55 patients with the acute myocardial infarction aged between 34 and 69 years (mean 53 years) in whom the relation of cardiac arrhythmias incidence to the extension of myocardial involvement and circulatory efficiency was assessed. All patients were examined clinically, a 24-hour ECG with Holter technique (in the first day, 21st day and 6th months after myocardial infarction) and echocardiographic (Echo-2D) tests were registered. Echocardiography was performed during hospital phase and 6 months after myocardial infarction. Cardiac arrhythmias were evaluated with classification into classes described by Lown. Close relation of serious cardiac arrhythmias with extension of myocardial involvement was noted especially in the acute phase of myocardial infarction. High risk arrhythmias--class IVA, IVB and V were noted in nearly 100% of patients in this phase with cardiac aneurysm, extensive akinesis of apex and anterior wall of the heart. Mean value of the ejection fraction was 31% in this group. Incidence of cardiac arrhythmias did not exceed 40%, ejection fraction was 56% in the group of patients with limited lesions to the heart, e.g. akinesis of the lower wall. Incidence of late cardiac arrhythmias (6 months) did not differ significantly in particular groups of patients. The value of ejection fraction remained, however, on the same level as in the hospital phase of the myocardial infarction.     

急性心肌梗死患者PCI治疗后抑郁对心率变异性、内皮功能及不良心血管事件发生率的影响

目的:探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)患者经皮冠状动脉介入(PCI)治疗后抑郁对心率变异性(HRV)、内皮功能及不良心血管事件(MACE)发生率的影响。方法:选择2017年1月-2018年12月期间在本院接受PCI治疗的AMI患者117例作为研究对象,根据PCI术后出院当日的抑郁自评量表(SDS)评分值将其分为抑郁组(评分值≥53分)41例、非抑郁组(评分值<53分)76例。对比两组患者HRV相关指标[正常RR间期标准差(SDNN)、5 min内正常RR间期平均值标准差(SDANN)、相邻正常RR间期差值均方的平方根(RMSSD)、总功率(TP)、低频功率(LF)、高频功率(HF)、低频功率与高频功率比值(LF/HF)]、内皮功能指标[内皮依赖性血管舒张功能(FMD)、非内皮依赖性血管舒张功能(NMD)]水平差异,记录两组随访期内MACE发生情况。结果:PCI术后出院当日,抑郁组患者的HRV时域指标SDNN、SDANN、RMSSD水平低于非抑郁组患者;频域指标中LF、LF/HF的水平高于非抑郁组,HF的水平低于非抑郁组(P<0.05),两组患者TP水平的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。抑郁组患者的FMD、NMD水平均低于非抑郁组患者,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随访期内,抑郁组患者的MACE总发生率、再发心肌梗死发生率高于非抑郁组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患者顽固性心绞痛、新发心肌梗死、心力衰竭、心源性死亡发生率的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:AMI患者PCI后合并抑郁可能对心血管系统造成负面影响并最终增加MACE的发生风险。     

Relation between expression of TNF alpha, iNOS, VEGF mRNA and development of heart failure after experimental myocardial infarction in rats.

An injury to the heart due to myocardial infarction (MI) may progress to heart failure. Among factors, whose interactions promote remodeling of ischemic myocardium, the increased expression of tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha), inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) was found. However, little is known about the temporal and spatial relation between expression of iNOS, cytokine TNFalpha, and growth factor VEGF during pathological process of development of heart failure after the myocardial infarction. Male Sprague-Dawley rats were used for experimental myocardial infarction. The procedure was performed by anterolateral thoracotomy and snearing LAD with the metal clip. The hemodynamic measurements were done with the Langendorff preparation converted into a working heart system. The hemodynamic parameters were recorded at day 6, 11, 28, 40 and the myocardium for gene expression was collected at day 1, 4, 11, 28, 40. Control group was sham operated rats. The VEGF, TNFalpha, iNOS, and GAPDH genes were detected by RT-PCR assay from samples taken at border zone of myocardial infarction. Expression of isoform VEGF120 was found at day 1 and 4 after MI, whereas isoforms VEGF164 and VEGF188 along with expression of TNFalpha and iNOS was found at day 1, 4, 11, 28, 40. No expression of examined genes was detected in the myocardium of control rats. The expression of studied factors was parallel with development of heart failure after myocardial infarction assessed by hemodynamic measurements. These findings confirm the postulated involvement of TNFalpha, iNOS and growth factor VEGF in the remodeling of the myocardium and development of heart failure after experimental myocardial infarction.     

How long should patients with suspected myocardial infarction be under observation in hospital?

Out of 368 patients admitted to hospital for chest pain and suspected acute myocardial infarction, 267 were discharged within 24 hours on the basis of the clinical picture, electrocardiogram, and serum activities of aspartate transaminase, alpha-hydroxybutyrate dehydrogenase, and creatine phosphokinase. The patients were followed up for 28 days, during which 17 were readmitted, two of them twice and one three times. Two of the patients were readmitted with non-fatal acute myocardial infarction, and two died. The patients had been primarily divided into two groups: those admitted with presumably non-coronary chest pain (77 patients) formed group 1 and those with obvious coronary chest pain (190 patients) group 2. Both deaths occurred in patients in group 2 but the incidences of events during the follow-up period were otherwise similar in the two groups, and some patients in both groups may have had small acute myocardial infarctions when first admitted. The decision to keep in hospital or discharge a patient with chest pain of recent onset can be made within 24 hours of admission. To discharge the patient acute myocardial infarction need not necessarily be excluded and conventional tests are enough to enable a decision to be made.     

眼科以咽部瘙痒为首发症状的心肌梗死1 例- 附文献复习

目的:提高异位疼痛为首发症状心肌梗死的临床警惕性与确诊率。方法:通过我院不典型心肌梗死病例1例就诊过程进行回顾性追溯分析,进行相关文献复习,总结提高诊断准确性,减少误诊的经验方法。结果:因诊断及时,患者经积极的抢救治疗,症状改善,治愈出院。结论:提高对异位疼痛为首发症状心肌梗死的警惕,拓宽诊断思维,全面体检,尤其注意心电图:动态心电图、心肌酶谱的监测,及时确诊,以尽量减少不典型心肌梗死的误诊。     

Predictive values of sST2 and IL-33 for heart failure in patients with acute myocardial infarction

Timely prediction of the risk of heart failure in acute myocardial infarction patients is critical for better prognosis. This article aims to evaluate the predictive value of serum soluble growth stimulation expressed gene 2 (sST2) and interleukin-33 in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by heart failure. A total of 42 healthy controls and 144 acute myocardial infarction patients were recruited in the study. According to Killip cardiac function classification as the basis for concurrent heart failure, they were distributed into non-heart failure group (n = 76) and heart failure group (n = 68). ELISA was utilized to determine the serum sST2 and interleukin-33 levels, and the diagnostic efficiency was evaluated by receiver operating characteristics curve. sST2 and interleukin-33 levels in patients with acute myocardial infarction were significantly increased when compared with normal healthy controls, and were further enhanced in the heart failure group. With the increased Killip cardiac function classification, interleukin-33 and sST2 levels were gradually elevated. Multivariate analysis indicated that interleukin-33 and sST2 could be used as independent predictors for heart failure combined with acute myocardial infarction.     

Sudden Death in Hospital after Discharge from Coronary Care Unit

In a group of 339 patients with acute myocardial infarction treated in a coronary care unit, 273 left the unit while improving and were expected to leave hospital alive; 23 had a cardiac arrest or died suddenly while still in hospital—17 died immediately or after temporary resuscitation and six were resuscitated to leave hospital alive. Ventricular fibrillation was found in 13 of the 20 patients attended by the cardiac arrest team. The incidents were scattered from the 4th to the 24th day after the onset of infarction. Risk factors in these “late sudden death” patients were compared with the 250 patients who left the unit while improving and did not die or suffer cardiac arrest. The patients susceptible to late sudden death were characterized early in their hospital course by the findings of severe, predominantly anterior infarction, left ventricular failure, persistent sinus tachycardia, and frequent ventricular arrhythmias. It is suggested that such patients be chosen for prolonged observation in a second-stage coronary care unit.     

肌钙蛋白I和肌红蛋白在急性心肌梗死患者血清中的变化特点及其诊断价值

目的:探讨肌钙蛋白I、CKMB的即时检测技术在急诊科心肌梗死患者中的应用及其临床意义。方法:研究对象为2012年10月至2013年8月于我急诊科急诊的急性心肌梗死患者,按就诊时间分为对照组和实验组。对照组患者采用常规化验室检测肌钙蛋白I、CKMB,实验组采用急诊科即时检测方法检测肌钙蛋白I、CKMB。对比两组患者从就诊到确诊的时间、住院天数、治愈率、心功能不全发生率和死亡率。结果:实验组患者的确诊时间为(25.5±5.6)min,住院天数为(9.89±1.5)天,治愈率为80.8%,心功能不全发生率为15.4%。对照组患者的确诊时间为(66.8±10.0)min,住院天数为(12.6±2.5)天,治愈率为56.0%,心功能不全发生率为32.0%P均.0.05,有统计学意义。两组患者死亡率分别为12%和3.8%,无明显差异。结论:对心肌梗死患者采用肌钙蛋白I、CKMB的即时检测对于提高患者治愈率,减少确诊时间和住院时间,降低心功能不全发生率有很大帮助。     

Cardiac Monitoring in a Community Hospital—Analysis of 18 Months' Experience

Cardiac monitoring facilities have been present in teaching hospital centers for over five years. A substantial decrease in mortality has been observed in monitored patients with acute myocardial infarction. The community hospital system offers a challenge to effective monitoring since many physicians care for patients and often many kinds of therapy are used.After 18 months of operation mortality from myocardial infarction was only 16.6 percent in a community hospital monitoring unit where the majority of the emergency care and resuscitation was carried out by nurses. Vital to this success was the use of standing orders for nurses, requirement of privilege to practice within the monitoring facility and acceptance of the nurse as a therapist in emergency situations.Fourteen patients were successfully resuscitated and were later discharged from the hospital. Four of them had ventricular fibrillation from digitalis intoxication.Patients with shock and severe congestive heart failure continue to be a major unsolved clinical problem. The results indicate that the potentially viable patient with serious electrical disturbances can almost invariably be salvaged.     

Factors associated with physician follow-up among patients with chest pain discharged from the emergency department

Background:

Many patients with chest pain do not receive follow-up from a physician after discharge from the emergency department despite significant survival benefit associated with follow-up care. Our objective was to evaluate factors associated with physician follow-up to understand this gap in practice.

Methods:

We conducted an observational study involving patients at high risk who were assessed for chest pain and discharged from an emergency department in Ontario between April 2004 and March 2010. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the association of clinical and nonclinical characteristics with physician follow-up.

Results:

We identified 56 767 patients, of whom 25.1% did not receive any follow-up by a physician, 69.0% were seen by their primary care physician, and 17.3% were seen by a cardiologist within 30 days. Patients who had medical comorbidities and cardiac conditions such as myocardial infarction or heart failure were less likely to have follow-up. In contrast, a previous visit to a primary care physician was associated with the highest odds of having physician follow-up (odds ratio [OR] 6.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.91–7.01). Similarly, a previous visit to a cardiologist was strongly associated with follow-up by a cardiologist (OR 3.01, 95% CI 2.85–3.17). Patients evaluated in emergency departments with the highest tertile of chest pain volume were more likely to receive follow-up from any physician (OR 1.52, 95% CI 1.31–1.77) and from a cardiologist (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.61–2.57).

Interpretation:

Nonclinical factors are strongly associated with physician follow-up for patients with chest pain after discharge from the emergency department. However, patients with comorbidities and at higher risk for future adverse events are less likely to receive follow-up care.Chest pain is one of the most common presenting symptoms in emergency departments. In Canada, about 500 000 visits to the emergency department are related to chest pain assessment each year.¹ Most of these visits result in discharge after excluding a cardiac diagnosis with an immediate risk of adverse effect.² Current clinical guidelines strongly advocate for patients with chest pain who have been discharged from the emergency department to receive outpatient follow-up with a physician within 72 hours for further assessment or treatment, because many patients remain at risk for future events.³Among patients at high baseline cardiovascular risk who were discharged from the emergency department after assessment of chest pain, our group has previously shown significantly reduced hazard of death or myocardial infarction associated with follow-up with either a primary care physician or a cardiologist within 30 days.² At 1-year postassessment, the rate of death or myocardial infarction was 5.5% among patients who received cardiologist follow-up, 7.7% with primary care follow-up and 8.6% with no physician follow-up.² In addition, we found a considerable gap in practice, with 1 in 4 high-risk patients with chest pain failing to follow-up with a physician within 30 days of assessment in Ontario, Canada.² A better understanding of why physician follow-up does not occur in accordance with guidelines is essential to improve the transition of care from the emergency department to home. Thus, the main objective of our study was to evaluate clinical and nonclinical factors associated with physician follow-up among patients with chest pain after discharge from the emergency department.