M-TASSER: an algorithm for protein quaternary structure prediction

In a cell, it has been estimated that each protein on average interacts with roughly 10 others, resulting in tens of thousands of proteins known or suspected to have interaction partners; of these, only a tiny fraction have solved protein structures. To partially address this problem, we have developed M-TASSER, a hierarchical method to predict protein quaternary structure from sequence that involves template identification by multimeric threading, followed by multimer model assembly and refinement. The final models are selected by structure clustering. M-TASSER has been tested on a benchmark set comprising 241 dimers having templates with weak sequence similarity and 246 without multimeric templates in the dimer library. Of the total of 207 targets predicted to interact as dimers, 165 (80%) were correctly assigned as interacting with a true positive rate of 68% and a false positive rate of 17%. The initial best template structures have an average root mean-square deviation to native of 5.3, 6.7, and 7.4 Å for the monomer, interface, and dimer structures. The final model shows on average a root mean-square deviation improvement of 1.3, 1.3, and 1.5 Å over the initial template structure for the monomer, interface, and dimer structures, with refinement evident for 87% of the cases. Thus, we have developed a promising approach to predict full-length quaternary structure for proteins that have weak sequence similarity to proteins of solved quaternary structure.     

A multiple-template approach to protein threading

Most threading methods predict the structure of a protein using only a single template. Due to the increasing number of solved structures, a protein without solved structure is very likely to have more than one similar template structures. Therefore, a natural question to ask is if we can improve modeling accuracy using multiple templates. This article describes a new multiple-template threading method to answer this question. At the heart of this multiple-template threading method is a novel probabilistic-consistency algorithm that can accurately align a single protein sequence simultaneously to multiple templates. Experimental results indicate that our multiple-template method can improve pairwise sequence-template alignment accuracy and generate models with better quality than single-template models even if they are built from the best single templates (P-value <10(-6)) while many popular multiple sequence/structure alignment tools fail to do so. The underlying reason is that our probabilistic-consistency algorithm can generate accurate multiple sequence/template alignments. In another word, without an accurate multiple sequence/template alignment, the modeling accuracy cannot be improved by simply using multiple templates to increase alignment coverage. Blindly tested on the CASP9 targets with more than one good template structures, our method outperforms all other CASP9 servers except two (Zhang-Server and QUARK of the same group). Our probabilistic-consistency algorithm can possibly be extended to align multiple protein/RNA sequences and structures.     

Protein-protein complex structure predictions by multimeric threading and template recombination

The total number of protein-protein complex structures currently available in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) is six times smaller than the total number of tertiary structures in the PDB, which limits the power of homology-based approaches to complex structure modeling. We present a threading-recombination approach, COTH, to boost the protein complex structure library by combining tertiary structure templates with complex alignments. The query sequences are first aligned to complex templates using a modified dynamic programming algorithm, guided by ab initio binding-site predictions. The monomer alignments are then shifted to the multimeric template framework by structural alignments. COTH was tested on 500 nonhomologous dimeric proteins, which can successfully detect correct templates for 50% of the cases after homologous templates are excluded, which significantly outperforms conventional homology modeling algorithms. It also shows a higher accuracy in interface modeling than rigid-body docking of unbound structures from ZDOCK although with lower coverage. These data demonstrate new avenues to model complex structures from nonhomologous templates.     

Homology-based modeling of 3D structures of protein-protein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles

Customary practice in predicting 3D structures of protein-protein complexes is employment of various docking methods when the structures of separate monomers are known a priori. The alternative approach, i.e. the template-based prediction with pure sequence information as a starting point, is still considered as being inferior mostly due to presumption that the pool of available structures of protein-protein complexes, which can serve as putative templates, is not sufficiently large. Recently, however, several labs have developed databases containing thousands of 3D structures of protein-protein complexes, which enable statistically reliable testing of homology-based algorithms. In this paper we report the results on homology-based modeling of 3D structures of protein complexes using alignments of modified sequence profiles. The method, called HOMology-BAsed COmplex Prediction (HOMBACOP), has two distinctive features: (I) extra weight on aligning interfacial residues in the dynamical programming algorithm, and (II) increased gap penalties for the interfacial segments. The method was tested against our recently developed ProtCom database and against the Boston University protein-protein BENCHMARK. In both cases, models generated were compared to the models built on basis of customarily protein structure initiative (PSI)-BLAST sequence alignments. It was found that existence of homologous (by the means of PSI-BLAST) templates (44% of cases) enables both methods to produce models of good quality, with the profiles method outperforming the PSI-BLAST models (with respect to the percentage of correctly predicted residues on the complex interface and fraction of native interfacial contacts). The models were evaluated according to the CAPRI assessment criteria and about two thirds of the models were found to fall into acceptable and medium-quality categories. The same comparison of a larger set of 463 protein complexes showed again that profiles generate better models. We further demonstrate, using our ProtCom database, the suitability of the profile alignment algorithm in detecting remote homologues between query and template sequences, where the PSI-BLAST method fails.     

Scoring function for automated assessment of protein structure template quality

We have developed a new scoring function, the template modeling score (TM-score), to assess the quality of protein structure templates and predicted full-length models by extending the approaches used in Global Distance Test (GDT)1 and MaxSub.2 First, a protein size-dependent scale is exploited to eliminate the inherent protein size dependence of the previous scores and appropriately account for random protein structure pairs. Second, rather than setting specific distance cutoffs and calculating only the fractions with errors below the cutoff, all residue pairs in alignment/modeling are evaluated in the proposed score. For comparison of various scoring functions, we have constructed a large-scale benchmark set of structure templates for 1489 small to medium size proteins using the threading program PROSPECTOR_3 and built the full-length models using MODELLER and TASSER. The TM-score of the initial threading alignments, compared to the GDT and MaxSub scoring functions, shows a much stronger correlation to the quality of the final full-length models. The TM-score is further exploited as an assessment of all 'new fold' targets in the recent CASP5 experiment and shows a close coincidence with the results of human-expert visual assessment. These data suggest that the TM-score is a useful complement to the fully automated assessment of protein structure predictions. The executable program of TM-score is freely downloadable at http://bioinformatics.buffalo.edu/TM-score.     

Fold recognition by predicted alignment accuracy

One of the key components in protein structure prediction by protein threading technique is to choose the best overall template for a given target sequence after all the optimal sequence-template alignments are generated. The chosen template should have the best alignment with the target sequence since the three-dimensional structure of the target sequence is built on the sequence-template alignment. The traditional method for template selection is called Z-score, which uses a statistical test to rank all the sequence-template alignments and then chooses the first-ranked template for the sequence. However, the calculation of Z-score is time-consuming and not suitable for genome-scale structure prediction. Z-scores are also hard to interpret when the threading scoring function is the weighted sum of several energy items of different physical meanings. This paper presents a support vector machine (SVM) regression approach to directly predict the alignment accuracy of a sequence-template alignment, which is used to rank all the templates for a specific target sequence. Experimental results on a large-scale benchmark demonstrate that SVM regression performs much better than the composition-corrected Z-score method. SVM regression also runs much faster than the Z-score method.     

Development and large scale benchmark testing of the PROSPECTOR_3 threading algorithm

This article describes the PROSPECTOR_3 threading algorithm, which combines various scoring functions designed to match structurally related target/template pairs. Each variant described was found to have a Z-score above which most identified templates have good structural (threading) alignments, Z(struct) (Z(good)). 'Easy' targets with accurate threading alignments are identified as single templates with Z > Z(good) or two templates, each with Z > Z(struct), having a good consensus structure in mutually aligned regions. 'Medium' targets have a pair of templates lacking a consensus structure, or a single template for which Z(struct) < Z < Z(good). PROSPECTOR_3 was applied to a comprehensive Protein Data Bank (PDB) benchmark composed of 1491 single domain proteins, 41-200 residues long and no more than 30% identical to any threading template. Of the proteins, 878 were found to be easy targets, with 761 having a root mean square deviation (RMSD) from native of less than 6.5 A. The average contact prediction accuracy was 46%, and on average 17.6 residue continuous fragments were predicted with RMSD values of 2.0 A. There were 606 medium targets identified, 87% (31%) of which had good structural (threading) alignments. On average, 9.1 residue, continuous fragments with RMSD of 2.5 A were predicted. Combining easy and medium sets, 63% (91%) of the targets had good threading (structural) alignments compared to native; the average target/template sequence identity was 22%. Only nine targets lacked matched templates. Moreover, PROSPECTOR_3 consistently outperforms PSIBLAST. Similar results were predicted for open reading frames (ORFS) < or =200 residues in the M. genitalium, E. coli and S. cerevisiae genomes. Thus, progress has been made in identification of weakly homologous/analogous proteins, with very high alignment coverage, both in a comprehensive PDB benchmark as well as in genomes.     

A method for the improvement of threading-based protein models

A new method for the homology-based modeling of protein three-dimensional structures is proposed and evaluated. The alignment of a query sequence to a structural template produced by threading algorithms usually produces low-resolution molecular models. The proposed method attempts to improve these models. In the first stage, a high-coordination lattice approximation of the query protein fold is built by suitable tracking of the incomplete alignment of the structural template and connection of the alignment gaps. These initial lattice folds are very similar to the structures resulting from standard molecular modeling protocols. Then, a Monte Carlo simulated annealing procedure is used to refine the initial structure. The process is controlled by the model's internal force field and a set of loosely defined restraints that keep the lattice chain in the vicinity of the template conformation. The internal force field consists of several knowledge-based statistical potentials that are enhanced by a proper analysis of multiple sequence alignments. The template restraints are implemented such that the model chain can slide along the template structure or even ignore a substantial fraction of the initial alignment. The resulting lattice models are, in most cases, closer (sometimes much closer) to the target structure than the initial threading-based models. All atom models could easily be built from the lattice chains. The method is illustrated on 12 examples of target/template pairs whose initial threading alignments are of varying quality. Possible applications of the proposed method for use in protein function annotation are briefly discussed.     

TASSER_low‐zsc: An approach to improve structure prediction using low z‐score–ranked templates

In a variety of threading methods, often poorly ranked (low z‐score) templates have good alignments. Here, a new method, TASSER_low‐zsc that identifies these low z‐score–ranked templates to improve protein structure prediction accuracy, is described. The approach consists of clustering of threading templates by affinity propagation on the basis of structural similarity (thread_cluster) followed by TASSER modeling, with final models selected by using a TASSER_QA variant. To establish the generality of the approach, templates provided by two threading methods, SP³ and SPARKS², are examined. The SP³ and SPARKS² benchmark datasets consist of 351 and 357 medium/hard proteins (those with moderate to poor quality templates and/or alignments) of length ≤250 residues, respectively. For SP³ medium and hard targets, using thread_cluster, the TM‐scores of the best template improve by ～4 and 9% over the original set (without low z‐score templates) respectively; after TASSER modeling/refinement and ranking, the best model improves by ～7 and 9% over the best model generated with the original template set. Moreover, TASSER_low‐zsc generates 22% (43%) more foldable medium (hard) targets. Similar improvements are observed with low‐ranked templates from SPARKS². The template clustering approach could be applied to other modeling methods that utilize multiple templates to improve structure prediction. Proteins 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Multiple Model Approach: Exploring the Limits of Comparative Modeling

One of the biggest problems in modeling distantly related proteins is the quality of the target-template alignment. This problem often results in low quality models that do not utilize all the information available in the template structure. The divergence of alignments at a low sequence identity level, which is a hindrance in most modeling attempts, is used here as a basis for a new technique of Multiple Model Approach (MMA). Alternative alignments prepared here using different mutation matrices and gap penalties, combined with automated model building, are used to create a set of models that explore a range of possible conformations for the target protein. Models are evaluated using different techniques to identify the best model. In the set of examples studied here, the correct target structure is known, which allows the evaluation of various alignment and evaluation strategies. For a randomly selected group of distantly homologous protein pairs representing all structural classes and various fold types, it is shown that a threading score based on simplified statistical potentials of mean force can identify the best models and, consequently, the most reliable alignment. In cases where the difference between target and template structures is significant, the threading score shows clearly that all models are wrong, therefore disqualifying the template.     

Protein Structure Prediction by Pro-Sp3-TASSER

An automated protein structure prediction algorithm, pro-sp3-Threading/ASSEmbly/Refinement (TASSER), is described and benchmarked. Structural templates are identified using five different scoring functions derived from the previously developed threading methods PROSPECTOR_3 and SP³. Top templates identified by each scoring function are combined to derive contact and distant restraints for subsequent model refinement by short TASSER simulations. For Medium/Hard targets (those with moderate to poor quality templates and/or alignments), alternative template alignments are also generated by parametric alignment and the top models selected by TASSER-QA are included in the contact and distance restraint derivation. Then, multiple short TASSER simulations are used to generate an ensemble of full-length models. Subsequently, the top models are selected from the ensemble by TASSER-QA and used to derive TASSER contacts and distant restraints for another round of full TASSER refinement. The final models are selected from both rounds of TASSER simulations by TASSER-QA. We compare pro-sp3-TASSER with our previously developed MetaTASSER method (enhanced with chunk-TASSER for Medium/Hard targets) on a representative test data set of 723 proteins <250 residues in length. For the 348 proteins classified as easy targets (those templates with good alignments and global structure similarity to the target), the cumulative TM-score of the best of top five models by pro-sp3-TASSER shows a 2.1% improvement over MetaTASSER. For the 155/220 medium/hard targets, the improvements in TM-score are 2.8% and 2.2%, respectively. All improvements are statistically significant. More importantly, the number of foldable targets (those having models whose TM-score to native >0.4 in the top five clusters) increases from 472 to 497 for all targets, and the relative increases for medium and hard targets are 10% and 15%, respectively. A server that implements the above algorithm is available at http://cssb.biology.gatech.edu/skolnick/webservice/pro-sp3-TASSER/. The source code is also available upon request.     

Comparative modeling without implicit sequence alignments

MOTIVATION: The number of known protein sequences is about thousand times larger than the number of experimentally solved 3D structures. For more than half of the protein sequences a close or distant structural analog could be identified. The key starting point in a classical comparative modeling is to generate the best possible sequence alignment with a template or templates. With decreasing sequence similarity, the number of errors in the alignments increases and these errors are the main causes of the decreasing accuracy of the molecular models generated. Here we propose a new approach to comparative modeling, which does not require the implicit alignment - the model building phase explores geometric, evolutionary and physical properties of a template (or templates). RESULTS: The proposed method requires prior identification of a template, although the initial sequence alignment is ignored. The model is built using a very efficient reduced representation search engine CABS to find the best possible superposition of the query protein onto the template represented as a 3D multi-featured scaffold. The criteria used include: sequence similarity, predicted secondary structure consistency, local geometric features and hydrophobicity profile. For more difficult cases, the new method qualitatively outperforms existing schemes of comparative modeling. The algorithm unifies de novo modeling, 3D threading and sequence-based methods. The main idea is general and could be easily combined with other efficient modeling tools as Rosetta, UNRES and others.     

Benchmarking of TASSER_2.0: an improved protein structure prediction algorithm with more accurate predicted contact restraints

To improve tertiary structure predictions of more difficult targets, the next generation of TASSER, TASSER_2.0, has been developed. TASSER_2.0 incorporates more accurate side-chain contact restraint predictions from a new approach, the composite-sequence method, based on consensus restraints generated by an improved threading algorithm, PROSPECTOR_3.5, which uses computationally evolved and wild-type template sequences as input. TASSER_2.0 was tested on a large-scale, benchmark set of 2591 nonhomologous, single domain proteins ≤200 residues that cover the Protein Data Bank at 35% pairwise sequence identity. Compared with the average fraction of accurately predicted side-chain contacts of 0.37 using PROSPECTOR_3.5 with wild-type template sequences, the average accuracy of the composite-sequence method increases to 0.60. The resulting TASSER_2.0 models are closer to their native structures, with an average root mean-square deviation of 4.99 Å compared to the 5.31 Å result of TASSER. Defining a successful prediction as a model with a root mean-square deviation to native <6.5 Å, the success rate of TASSER_2.0 (TASSER) for Medium targets (targets with good templates/poor alignments) is 74.3% (64.7%) and 40.8% (35.5%) for the Hard targets (incorrect templates/alignments). For Easy targets (good templates/alignments), the success rate slightly increases from 86.3% to 88.4%.     

Protein sequence threading: Averaging over structures

Multiple sequence alignments are a routine tool in protein fold recognition, but multiple structure alignments are computationally less cooperative. This work describes a method for protein sequence threading and sequence-to-structure alignments that uses multiple aligned structures, the aim being to improve models from protein threading calculations. Sequences are aligned into a field due to corresponding sites in homologous proteins. On the basis of a test set of more than 570 protein pairs, the procedure does improve alignment quality, although no more than averaging over sequences. For the force field tested, the benefit of structure averaging is smaller than that of adding sequence similarity terms or a contribution from secondary structure predictions. Although there is a significant improvement in the quality of sequence-to-structure alignments, this does not directly translate to an immediate improvement in fold recognition capability.     

Fold recognition and accurate query-template alignment by a combination of PSI-BLAST and threading

A homology-based structure prediction method ideally gives both a correct fold assignment and an accurate query-template alignment. In this article we show that the combination of two existing methods, PSI-BLAST and threading, leads to significant enhancement in the success rate of fold recognition. The combined approach, termed COBLATH, also yields much higher alignment accuracy than found in previous studies. It consists of two-way searches both by PSI-BLAST and by threading. In the PSI-BLAST portion, a query is used to search for hits in a library of potential templates and, conversely, each potential template is used to search for hits in a library of queries. In the threading portion, the scoring function is the sum of a sequence profile and a 6x6 substitution matrix between predicted query and known template secondary structure and solvent exposure. "Two-way" in threading means that the query's sequence profile is used to match the sequences of all potential templates and the sequence profiles of all potential templates are used to match the query's sequence. When tested on a set of 533 nonhomologous proteins, COBLATH was able to assign folds for 390 (73%). Among these 390 queries, 265 (68%) had root-mean-square deviations (RMSDs) of less than 8 A between predicted and actual structures. Such high success rate and accuracy make COBLATH an ideal tool for structural genomics.     

MULTIPROSPECTOR: an algorithm for the prediction of protein-protein interactions by multimeric threading

In this postgenomic era, the ability to identify protein-protein interactions on a genomic scale is very important to assist in the assignment of physiological function. Because of the increasing number of solved structures involving protein complexes, the time is ripe to extend threading to the prediction of quaternary structure. In this spirit, a multimeric threading approach has been developed. The approach is comprised of two phases. In the first phase, traditional threading on a single chain is applied to generate a set of potential structures for the query sequences. In particular, we use our recently developed threading algorithm, PROSPECTOR. Then, for those proteins whose template structures are part of a known complex, we rethread on both partners in the complex and now include a protein-protein interfacial energy. To perform this analysis, a database of multimeric protein structures has been constructed, the necessary interfacial pairwise potentials have been derived, and a set of empirical indicators to identify true multimers based on the threading Z-score and the magnitude of the interfacial energy have been established. The algorithm has been tested on a benchmark set comprised of 40 homodimers, 15 heterodimers, and 69 monomers that were scanned against a protein library of 2478 structures that comprise a representative set of structures in the Protein Data Bank. Of these, the method correctly recognized and assigned 36 homodimers, 15 heterodimers, and 65 monomers. This protocol was applied to identify partners and assign quaternary structures of proteins found in the yeast database of interacting proteins. Our multimeric threading algorithm correctly predicts 144 interacting proteins, compared to the 56 (26) cases assigned by PSI-BLAST using a (less) permissive E-value of 1 (0.01). Next, all possible pairs of yeast proteins have been examined. Predictions (n = 2865) of protein-protein interactions are made; 1138 of these 2865 interactions have counterparts in the Database of Interacting Proteins. In contrast, PSI-BLAST made 1781 predictions, and 1215 have counterparts in DIP. An estimation of the false-negative rate for yeast-predicted interactions has also been provided. Thus, a promising approach to help assist in the assignment of protein-protein interactions on a genomic scale has been developed.     

Development and benchmarking of TASSER(iter) for the iterative improvement of protein structure predictions

To improve the accuracy of TASSER models especially in the limit where threading provided template alignments are of poor quality, we have developed the TASSER(iter) algorithm which uses the templates and contact restraints from TASSER generated models for iterative structure refinement. We apply TASSER(iter) to a large benchmark set of 2,773 nonhomologous single domain proteins that are < or = 200 in length and that cover the PDB at the level of 35% pairwise sequence identity. Overall, TASSER(iter) models have a smaller global average RMSD of 5.48 A compared to 5.81 A RMSD of the original TASSER models. Classifying the targets by the level of prediction difficulty (where Easy targets have a good template with a corresponding good threading alignment, Medium targets have a good template but a poor alignment, and Hard targets have an incorrectly identified template), TASSER(iter) (TASSER) models have an average RMSD of 4.15 A (4.35 A) for the Easy set and 9.05 A (9.52 A) for the Hard set. The largest reduction of average RMSD is for the Medium set where the TASSER(iter) models have an average global RMSD of 5.67 A compared to 6.72 A of the TASSER models. Seventy percent of the Medium set TASSER(iter) models have a smaller RMSD than the TASSER models, while 63% of the Easy and 60% of the Hard TASSER models are improved by TASSER(iter). For the foldable cases, where the targets have a RMSD to the native <6.5 A, TASSER(iter) shows obvious improvement over TASSER models: For the Medium set, it improves the success rate from 57.0 to 67.2%, followed by the Hard targets where the success rate improves from 32.0 to 34.8%, with the smallest improvement in the Easy targets from 82.6 to 84.0%. These results suggest that TASSER(iter) can provide more reliable predictions for targets of Medium difficulty, a range that had resisted improvement in the quality of protein structure predictions.     

Cooperative folding units of escherichia coli tryptophan repressor.

A previously published computational procedure was used to identify cooperative folding units within tryptophan repressor. The theoretical results predict the existence of distinct stable substructures in the protein chain for the monomer and the dimer. The predictions were compared with experimental data on structure and folding of the repressor and its proteolytic fragments and show excellent agreement for the dimeric form of the protein. The results suggest that the monomer, the structure of which is currently unknown, is likely to have a structure different from the one it has within the context of the highly intertwined dimer. Application of this method to the repressor monomer represents an extension of the computations into the realm of evaluating hypothetical structures such as those produced by threading.     

Cover Image,Volume 87, Issue 7

Template-based modeling is considered as one of the most successful approaches for protein structure prediction. However, reliably and accurately selecting optimal template proteins from a library of known protein structures having similar folds as the target protein and making correct alignments between the target sequence and the template structures, a template-based modeling technique known as threading, remains challenging, particularly for non- or distantly-homologous protein targets. With the recent advancement in protein residue-residue contact map prediction powered by sequence co-evolution and machine learning, here we systematically analyze the effect of inclusion of residue-residue contact information in improving the accuracy and reliability of protein threading. We develop a new threading algorithm by incorporating various sequential and structural features, and subsequently integrate residue-residue contact information as an additional scoring term for threading template selection. We show that the inclusion of contact information attains statistically significantly better threading performance compared to a baseline threading algorithm that does not utilize contact information when everything else remains the same. Experimental results demonstrate that our contact based threading approach outperforms popular threading method MUSTER, contact-assisted ab initio folding method CONFOLD2, and recent state-of-the-art contact-assisted protein threading methods EigenTHREADER and map_align on several benchmarks. Our study illustrates that the inclusion of contact maps is a promising avenue in protein threading to ultimately help to improve the accuracy of protein structure prediction.     

Template‐based protein structure modeling using TASSERVMT

Template‐based protein structure modeling is commonly used for protein structure prediction. Based on the observation that multiple template‐based methods often perform better than single template‐based methods, we further explore the use of a variable number of multiple templates for a given target in the latest variant of TASSER, TASSER^VMT. We first develop an algorithm that improves the target‐template alignment for a given template. The improved alignment, called the SP³ alternative alignment, is generated by a parametric alignment method coupled with short TASSER refinement on models selected using knowledge‐based scores. The refined top model is then structurally aligned to the template to produce the SP³ alternative alignment. Templates identified using SP³ threading are combined with the SP³ alternative and HHEARCH alignments to provide target alignments to each template. These template models are then grouped into sets containing a variable number of template/alignment combinations. For each set, we run short TASSER simulations to build full‐length models. Then, the models from all sets of templates are pooled, and the top 20–50 models selected using FTCOM ranking method. These models are then subjected to a single longer TASSER refinement run for final prediction. We benchmarked our method by comparison with our previously developed approach, pro‐sp³‐TASSER, on a set with 874 easy and 318 hard targets. The average GDT‐TS score improvements for the first model are 3.5 and 4.3% for easy and hard targets, respectively. When tested on the 112 CASP9 targets, our method improves the average GDT‐TS scores as compared to pro‐sp3‐TASSER by 8.2 and 9.3% for the 80 easy and 32 hard targets, respectively. It also shows slightly better results than the top ranked CASP9 Zhang‐Server, QUARK and HHpredA methods. The program is available for download at http://cssb.biology.gatech.edu/ . © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.