Expression and purification of active WW domains of FBP11/HYPA and FBP28/CA150

Production of GST-fused WW domains of FBP proteins was increased using the bubbling cultivation method for E. coli. Purified WW domains of FBP11 and FBP28 bound a PL motif peptide with dissociation constants (K(D)) of 248 +/- 27 and 1880 +/- 280 microM, respectively.     

Structural basis for APPTPPPLPP peptide recognition by the FBP11WW1 domain

WW domains are small protein-protein interaction modules that recognize proline-rich stretches in proteins. The class II tandem WW domains of the formin binding protein 11 (FBP11) recognize specifically proteins containing PPLPp motifs as present in the formins that are involved in limb and kidney development, and in the methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 (MeCP2), associated with the Rett syndrome. The interaction involves the specific recognition of a leucine side-chain. Here, we report on the novel structure of the complex formed by the FPB11WW1 domain and the formin fragment APPTPPPLPP revealing the specificity determinants of class II WW domains.     

Structure of FBP11 WW1-PL ligand complex reveals the mechanism of proline-rich ligand recognition by group II/III WW domains

FBP11/HYPA is a mammalian homologue of yeast splicing factor Prp40. The first WW domain of FBP11/HYPA (FBP11 WW1) is essential for preventing severe neurological diseases such as Huntington disease and Rett syndrome and strongly resembles the WW domain of FCA, the essential regulator for flowering time control. We have solved the structure of FBP11 WW1 and a Pro-Pro-Leu-Pro ligand complex, and demonstrated the binding mechanism with mutational analysis using surface plasmon resonance. The overall structure of FBP11 WW1 in the complex form is quite similar to the structures of WW domains from Group I and IV in complexes. In addition, conformation of FBP11 WW1 does not change much upon ligand binding. The binding orientation of the ligand against FBP11 WW1 is the same as that of the Group IV WW domain-ligand complex, but opposite to that of the Group I complex. The ligand interacts with two grooves formed by surface aromatic residues. The Pro and Leu residues in the ligand interact with the grooves and the Loop I region of FBP11 WW1, respectively, which are necessary interactions for binding the ligand. Interestingly, the two aromatic grooves recognize the Pro residues in entirely different manners, which allows FBP11 WW1 to recognize shorter sequences than the SH3 domain. Combined with homology models of other WW domains, the present report shows the detailed mechanism of ligand binding by Group II/III WW domains, and provides information useful in designing drugs to treat neurodegenerative diseases.     

Folding, misfolding, and amyloid protofibril formation of WW domain FBP28

We study the folding mechanism of a triple beta-strand WW domain from the Formin binding protein 28 (FBP28) at atomic resolution with explicit water model using replica exchange molecular dynamics computer simulations. Extended sampling over a wide range of temperatures to obtain the free energy, enthalpy, and entropy surfaces as a function of structural coordinates has been performed. Simulations were started from different configurations covering the folded and unfolded states. In the free energy landscape a transition state is identified and its structures and -values are compared with experimental data from a homologous protein, the prolyl-isomerase Pin1 WW domain. A stable intermediate state is found to accumulate during the simulation characterized by the carboxyl-terminal beta-strand 3 having misregistered hydrogen bonds and where the structural heterogeneity is due to nonnative turn II formation. Furthermore, the aggregation behavior of the FBP28 WW domain may be related to one such misfolded structure, which has a much lower free energy of dimer formation than that of the native dimer. Based on the misfolded dimer, aggregation to form protofibril structure is discussed.     

Solution structure of an atypical WW domain in a novel beta-clam-like dimeric form

The WW domain is known as one of the smallest protein modules with a triple-stranded beta-sheet fold. Here, we present the solution structure of the second WW domain from the mouse salvador homolog 1 protein. This WW domain forms a homodimer with a beta-clam-like motif, as evidenced by size exclusion chromatography, analytical ultracentrifugation and NMR spectroscopy. While typical WW domains are believed to function as monomeric modules that recognize proline-rich sequences, by using conserved aromatic and hydrophobic residues that are solvent-exposed on the surface of the beta-sheet, this WW domain buries these residues in the dimer interface.     

FBP WW domains and the Abl SH3 domain bind to a specific class of proline-rich ligands.

WW domains are conserved protein motifs of 38-40 amino acids found in a broad spectrum of proteins. They mediate protein-protein interactions by binding proline-rich modules in ligands. A 10 amino acid proline-rich portion of the morphogenic protein, formin, is bound in vitro by both the WW domain of the formin-binding protein 11 (FBP11) and the SH3 domain of Abl. To explore whether the FBP11 WW domain and Abl SH3 domain bind to similar ligands, we screened a mouse limb bud expression library for putative ligands of the FBP11 WW domain. In so doing, we identified eight ligands (WBP3 through WBP10), each of which contains a proline-rich region or regions. Peptide sequence comparisons of the ligands revealed a conserved motif of 10 amino acids that acts as a modular sequence binding the FBP11 WW domain, but not the WW domain of the putative signal transducing factor, hYAP65. Interestingly, the consensus ligand for the FBP11 WW domain contains residues that are also required for binding by the Abl SH3 domain. These findings support the notion that the FBP11 WW domain and the Abl SH3 domain can compete for the same proline-rich ligands and suggest that at least two subclasses of WW domains exist, namely those that bind a PPLP motif, and those that bind a PPXY motif.     

Solution structure of the DNA binding domain of AraC protein

We report the solution structure of the DNA binding domain of the Escherichia coli regulatory protein AraC determined in the absence of DNA. The 20 lowest energy structures, determined on the basis of 1507 unambiguous nuclear Overhauser restraints and 180 angle restraints, are well resolved with a pair wise backbone root mean square deviation of 0.7 Å. The protein, free of DNA, is well folded in solution and contains seven helices arranged in two semi‐independent sub domains, each containing one helix‐turn‐helix DNA binding motif, joined by a 19 residue central helix. This solution structure is discussed in the context of extensive biochemical and physiological data on AraC and with respect to the DNA‐bound structures of the MarA and Rob homologs. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Solution structure of telomere binding domain of AtTRB2 derived from Arabidopsis thaliana

Telomere homeostasis is regulated by telomere-associated proteins, and the Myb domain is well conserved for telomere binding. AtTRB2 is a member of the SMH (Single-Myb-Histone)-like family in Arabidopsis thaliana, having an N-terminal Myb domain, which is responsible for DNA binding. The Myb domain of AtTRB2 contains three α-helices and loops for DNA binding, which is unusual given that other plant telomere-binding proteins have an additional fourth helix that is essential for DNA binding. To understand the structural role for telomeric DNA binding of AtTRB2, we determined the solution structure of the Myb domain of AtTRB2 (AtTRB2_1–64) using nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy. In addition, the inter-molecular interaction between AtTRB2_1–64 and telomeric DNA has been characterized by the electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and NMR titration analyses for both plant (TTTAGGG)n and human (TTAGGG)n telomere sequences. Data revealed that Trp28, Arg29, and Val47 residues located in Helix 2 and Helix 3 are crucial for DNA binding, which are well conserved among other plant telomere binding proteins. We concluded that although AtTRB2 is devoid of the additional fourth helix in the Myb-extension domain, it is able to bind to plant telomeric repeat sequences as well as human telomeric repeat sequences.     

Solution structure of a Nedd4 WW domain-ENaC peptide complex

Nedd4 is a ubiquitin protein ligase composed of a C2 domain, three (or four) WW domains and a ubiquitin ligase Hect domain. Nedd4 was demonstrated to bind the epithelial sodium channel (alphabetagammaENaC), by association of its WW domains with PY motifs (XPPXY) present in each ENaC subunit, and to regulate the cell surface stability of the channel. The PY motif of betaENaC is deleted or mutated in Liddle syndrome, a hereditary form of hypertension caused by elevated ENaC activity. Here we report the solution structure of the third WW domain of Nedd4 complexed to the PY motif-containing region of betaENaC (TLPIPGTPPPNYDSL, referred to as betaP2). A polyproline type II helical conformation is adopted by the PPPN sequence. Unexpectedly, the C-terminal sequence YDSL forms a helical turn and both the tyrosine and the C-terminal leucine contact the WW domain. This is unlike other proline-rich peptides complexed to WW domains, which bind in an extended conformation and lack molecular interactions with residues C-terminal to the tyrosine or the structurally equivalent residue in non-PY motif WW domain targets. The Nedd4 WW domain-ENaC betaP2 peptide structure expands our understanding of the mechanisms involved in WW domain-ligand recognition and the molecular basis of Liddle syndrome.     

Solution structure of the dimeric zinc binding domain of the chaperone ClpX

ClpX (423 amino acids), a member of the Clp/Hsp100 family of molecular chaperones and the protease, ClpP, comprise a multimeric complex supporting targeted protein degradation in Escherichia coli. The ClpX sequence consists of an NH2-terminal zinc binding domain (ZBD) and a COOH-terminal ATPase domain. Earlier, we have demonstrated that the zinc binding domain forms a constitutive dimer that is essential for the degradation of some ClpX substrates such as gammaO and MuA but is not required for the degradation of other substrates such as green fluorescent protein-SsrA. In this report, we present the NMR solution structure of the zinc binding domain dimer. The monomer fold reveals that ZBD is a member of the treble clef zinc finger family, a motif known to facilitate protein-ligand, protein-DNA, and protein-protein interactions. However, the dimeric ZBD structure is not related to any protein structure in the Protein Data Bank. A trimer-of-dimers model of ZBD is presented, which might reflect the closed state of the ClpX hexamer.     

Evolution of binding affinity in a WW domain probed by phage display

The WW domain is an approximately 38 residue peptide-binding motif that binds a variety of sequences, including the consensus sequence xPPxY. We have displayed hYAP65 WW on the surface of M13 phage and randomized one-third of its three-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet. Improved binding to the hydrophobic peptide, GTPPPPYTVG (WW1), was selected in the presence of three different concentrations of proteinase K to simultaneously drive selection for improved stability as well as high-affinity binding. While some of the selected binders show cooperative unfolding transitions, others show noncooperative thermal unfolding curves. Two novel WW consensus sequences have been identified, which bind to the xPPxY motif with higher affinity than the wild-type hYAP65 WW domain. These WW domain sequences are not precedented in any natural WW domain sequence. Thus, there appear to be a large number of motifs capable of recognizing the target peptide sequence, only a subset of which appear to be used in natural proteins.     

Solution structure and antibody binding studies of the envelope protein domain III from the New York strain of West Nile virus

The solution structure of domain III from the New York West Nile virus strain 385-99 (WN-rED3) has been determined by NMR methods. The West Nile domain III structure is a beta-barrel structure formed from seven anti-parallel beta-strands in two beta-sheets. One anti-parallel beta-sheet consists of beta-strands beta1 (Phe(299)-Asp(307)), beta2 (Val(313)-Tyr(319)), beta4 (Arg(354)-Leu(355)), and beta5 (Lys(370)-Glu(376)) arranged so that beta2 is flanked on either side by beta1 and beta5. The short beta4 flanks the end of the remaining side of beta5. The remaining anti-parallel beta-sheet is formed from strands beta3 (Ile(340)-Val(343)), beta6 (Gly(380)-Arg(388)), and beta7 (Gln(391)-Lys(399)) arranged with beta6 at the center. Residues implicated in antigenic differences between different West Nile virus strains (and other flaviviruses) and neutralization are located on the outer surface of the protein. Characterization of the binding of monoclonal antibodies to WN-rED3 mutants, which were identified through neutralization escape experiments, indicate that antibody neutralization directly correlates with binding affinities. These studies provide an insight into theoretical virus-receptor interaction points, structure of immunogenic determinants, and potential targets for antiviral agents against West Nile virus and highlight differences between West Nile virus and other flavivirus structures that may represent critical determinants of virulence.     

Solution structure of a SRP19 binding domain in human SRP RNA

Assembly of the human signal recognition particle (SRP) requires SRP19 protein to bind to helices 6 and 8 of SRP RNA. In the present study, structure of a 29-mer RNA composing the SRP19 binding site in helix 6 was determined by NMR spectroscopy. The two A:C mismatches were continuously stacked to each other and formed wobble type A:C base pairs. The GGAG tetraloop in helix 6 was found to adopt a similar conformation to that of GNRA tetraloop, suggesting that these tetraloops are included in an extensive new motif GNRR. Compared with the crystal structure of helix 6 in complex with SRP19 determined previously, the GGAG tetraloop in the complex was found to adopt a similar conformation to the free form, although the loop structure becomes more open upon SRP19 binding. Thus, SRP19 is thought to recognize the overall fold of the GGAG loop.