Frameshift suppression through inactivation of translation termination in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae: significance of the local context

Site-directed mutagenesis and nucleotide sequence analysis were used to study the roles of the global and local contexts in suppression of the lys2-90 frameshift (FS) mutation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Global context features established for the LYS2 mRNA region containing the extra T (lys2-90) were similar to those characteristic of regions involved in translational frameshifting. These were a potential ability of the region to form a pseudoknot and the presence of heptanucleotide CUU UGA C with the "hungry" UGA nonsense codon in the pseudoknot. Some local context features proved to be essential for the phenotypic expression of FS suppression as a result of translational frameshifting. Two amino acid substitutions determined by the nucleotide sequence between the extra U and the UGA nonsense codon lacked expression. A dependence was observed between the efficiency of FS suppression and the type of the nonsense codon located at a particular position downstream of the extra nucleotide (UGA > UAG > UAA). When translation termination was inactivated, nonsense suppression and FS suppression correlated with each other. These results suggest that translational frameshifting, which underlies suppression in the case of inactivation of translation termination, most likely takes place on the nonsense codon arising as a result of insertion of an extra nucleotide.     

Partial Inactivation of Translation Termination Factors Causes Suppression of Frameshift Mutations in the Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Special search for frameshift mutations, which are suppressed by the cytoplasmic [PSI] factor and by omnipotent nonsense suppressors (recessive mutations in theSUP35and SUP45genes), partially inactivating a translation termination complex, was initiated in theLYS2gene in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.Mutations were obtained after exposure to UV light and treatment with a mixture of 1,6- and 1,8-dinitropyrene (DNP). This mixture was shown to induce mutations of the frameshift type with a high frequency. The majority of these mutations were insertions of one A or T, which is in good agreement with the data obtained in studies of DNP-induced mutagenesis in other eukaryotes. Frameshift suppression was shown on the example of the mutation obtained in this work (lys2-90), which carried the insertion of an extra T in the sequence of five T. This frameshift suppression was first shown to occur in the presence of the [PSI] factor (i.e., due to the prionization of the translation release factor eRF3) and as a result of mutations in genes SUP35orSUP45, which partially inactivate translation termination factors eRF3 and eRF1, respectively. Alternative mechanisms of programmed translational frameshifting in the course of translation and the possibility of enhancing the effectiveness of such frameshifting in the presence of the [PSI] factor are considered.     

DNA sequences required for translational frameshifting in production of the transposase encoded by IS1.

Summary The transposase encoded by insertion sequence IS 1 is produced from two out-of-phase reading frames (insA and B-insB) by translational frameshifting, which occurs within a run of six adenines in the –1 direction. To determine the sequence essential for frameshifting, substitution mutations were introduced within the region containing the run of adenines and were examined for their effects on frameshifting. Substitutions at each of three (2nd, 3rd and 4th) adenine residues in the run, which are recognized by tRNA^Lys reading insA, caused serious defects in frameshifting, showing that the three adenine residues are essential for frameshifting. The effects of substitution mutations introduced in the region flanking the run of adenines and in the secondary structures located downstream were, however, small, indicating that such a region and structures are not essential for frameshifting. Deletion of a region containing the termination codon of insA caused a decrease in -galactosidase activity specified by the lacZ fusion plasmid in frame with B-insB. Exchange of the wild-type termination codon of insA for a different one or introduction of an additional termination codon in the region upstream of the native termination codon caused an increase in -galactosidase activity, indicating that the termination codon in insA affects the efficiency of frameshifting.     

Itt1p, a novel protein inhibiting translation termination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Background

Termination of translation in eukaryotes is controlled by two interacting polypeptide chain release factors, eRFl and eRF3. eRFl recognizes nonsense codons UAA, UAG and UGA, while eRF3 stimulates polypeptide release from the ribosome in a GTP- and eRFl – dependent manner. Recent studies has shown that proteins interacting with these release factors can modulate the efficiency of nonsense codon readthrough.

Results

We have isolated a nonessential yeast gene, which causes suppression of nonsense mutations, being in a multicopy state. This gene encodes a protein designated Itt1p, possessing a zinc finger domain characteristic of the TRIAD proteins of higher eukaryotes. Overexpression of Itt1p decreases the efficiency of translation termination, resulting in the readthrough of all three types of nonsense codons. Itt1p interacts in vitro with both eRFl and eRF3. Overexpression of eRFl, but not of eRF3, abolishes the nonsense suppressor effect of overexpressed Itt1p.

Conclusions

The data obtained demonstrate that Itt1p can modulate the efficiency of translation termination in yeast. This protein possesses a zinc finger domain characteristic of the TRIAD proteins of higher eukaryotes, and this is a first observation of such protein being involved in translation.     

Control of <Emphasis Type="Italic">gag-pol</Emphasis> gene expression in the <Emphasis Type="Italic">Candida albicans</Emphasis> retrotransposon Tca2

Background  

In the C. albicans retrotransposon Tca2, the gag and pol ORFs are separated by a UGA stop codon, 3' of which is a potential RNA pseudoknot. It is unclear how the Tca2 gag UGA codon is bypassed to allow pol expression. However, in other retroelements, translational readthrough of the gag stop codon can be directed by its flanking sequence, including a 3' pseudoknot.     

Suppression of Nonsense and Frameshift Mutations Obtained by Different Methods for Inactivating the Translation Termination Factor eRF3 in Yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mutations in genes of omnipotent nonsense suppressors SUP35 and SUP45 in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding translation termination factors eRF3 and eRF1, respectively, and prionization of the eRF3 protein may lead to the suppression of some frameshift mutations (CPC mutations). Partial inactivation of the translation termination factor eRF3 was studied in strains with unstable genetically modified prions and also in transgenic yeast S. cerevisiae strains with the substitution of the indigenous SUP35 gene for its homolog from Pichia methanolica or for a recombinant S. cerevisiae SUP35gene. It was shown that this partial inactivation leads not only to nonsense suppression, but also to suppression of the frameshift lys2-90 mutation. Possible reasons for the correlation between nonsense suppression and suppression of the CPC lys2-90 mutation and mechanisms responsible for the suppression of CPC mutations during inactivation of translation termination factors are discussed.     

Suppression of frameshift mutation as a result of partial inactivation of translation termination factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast]

Special search for frameshift mutations, which are suppressed by the cytoplasmic [PSI] factor and by omnipotent nonsense suppressors (recessive mutations in the SUP35 and SUP45 genes), partially inactivating a translation termination complex, was initiated in the LYS2 gene in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutations were obtained after exposure to UV light and treatment with a mixture consisting of 1.6- and 1.8-dinitropyrene (DNP). This mixture was shown to induce mutations of the frameshift type with a high frequency. The majority of these mutations were insertions of one A or T, which is in good agreement with the data obtained in studies of DNP-induced mutagenesis in other eukaryotes. Frameshift suppression in yeast was first shown on the example of the mutation obtained in this work (lys2-90), which carried the insertion of an extra T in the sequence of five T. This frameshift suppression was shown to occur in the presence of the [PSI] factor (i.e., due to the prion form of the translation release factor eRF3) and as a result of mutations in genes SUP35 or SUP45, which partially inactivate translation termination factors eRF3 and eRF1, respectively. Alternative mechanisms of programmed translational frameshifting in the course of translation and the possibility of enhancing the effectiveness of such frameshifting in the presence of the [PSI] factor are considered.     

Use of tRNA suppressors to probe regulation of Escherichia coli release factor 2

It has been suggested that Escherichia coli release factor 2 (RF-2) translation is autoregulated. Mature RF-2 protein can terminate its own nascent synthesis at an intragenic, in-phase UGA codon, or alternatively, a +1 frameshift can occur that leads to completion of the RF-2 polypeptide. Translational termination presumably increases with RF-2 concentration, providing negative regulatory feedback. We now show, in lacZ/RF-2 fusions, that translation of a UAG codon at the position of the UGA competes with frameshifting, which proves one postulate of the translational autoregulatory model. We also identify a nearby sequence that is required for high-frequency frameshifting and suggest a constraint for the codon preceding the shift point. Both these sequences are incorporated into a model for frameshifting. Our measurements allow us to compute the relative rates in vivo of these reactions: release factor action, frameshifting and tRNA selection at an amber codon.     

Evidence that the supE44 Mutation of Escherichia coli Is an Amber Suppressor Allele of glnX and that It Also Suppresses Ochre and Opal Nonsense Mutations

Translational readthrough of nonsense codons is seen not only in organisms possessing one or more tRNA suppressors but also in strains lacking suppressors. Amber suppressor tRNAs have been reported to suppress only amber nonsense mutations, unlike ochre suppressors, which can suppress both amber and ochre mutations, essentially due to wobble base pairing. In an Escherichia coli strain carrying the lacZU118 episome (an ochre mutation in the lacZ gene) and harboring the supE44 allele, suppression of the ochre mutation was observed after 7 days of incubation. The presence of the supE44 lesion in the relevant strains was confirmed by sequencing, and it was found to be in the duplicate copy of the glnV tRNA gene, glnX. To investigate this further, an in vivo luciferase assay developed by D. W. Schultz and M. Yarus (J. Bacteriol. 172:595-602, 1990) was employed to evaluate the efficiency of suppression of amber (UAG), ochre (UAA), and opal (UGA) mutations by supE44. We have shown here that supE44 suppresses ochre as well as opal nonsense mutations, with comparable efficiencies. The readthrough of nonsense mutations in a wild-type E. coli strain was much lower than that in a supE44 strain when measured by the luciferase assay. Increased suppression of nonsense mutations, especially ochre and opal, by supE44 was found to be growth phase dependent, as this phenomenon was only observed in stationary phase and not in logarithmic phase. These results have implications for the decoding accuracy of the translational machinery, particularly in stationary growth phase.Translation termination is mediated by one of the three stop codons (UAA, UAG, or UGA). When such stop codons arise in coding sequences due to mutations, referred to as nonsense mutations, they lead to abrupt arrest of the translation process. However, the termination efficiency of such nonsense codons is not 100%, as certain tRNAs have the ability to read these nonsense codons. Genetic code ambiguity is seen in several organisms. Stop codons have been shown to have alternate roles apart from translation termination. In organisms from all three domains of life, UGA encodes selenocysteine through a specialized mechanism. In Methanosarcinaceae, UAG encodes pyrrolysine (3). UAA and UAG are read as glutamine codons in some green algae and ciliates such as Tetrahymena and Diplomonads (24), and UAG alone encodes glutamine in Moloney murine leukemia virus (32). UGA encodes cysteine in Euplotes; tryptophan in some ciliates, Mycoplasma species, Spiroplasma citri, Bacillus, and tobacco rattle virus; and an unidentified amino acid in Pseudomicrothorax dubius and Nyctotherus ovalis (30). In certain cases the context of the stop codon in translational readthrough has been shown to play a role; for example, it has been reported that in vitro in tobacco mosaic virus, UAG and UAA are misread by tRNA^Tyr in a highly context-dependent manner (34, 9).Termination suppressors are of three types, i.e., amber, ochre, and opal suppressors, which are named based on their ability to suppress the three stop codons. Amber suppressors can suppress only amber codons, whereas ochre suppressors can suppress ochre codons (by normal base pairing) as well as amber codons (by wobbling) and opal suppressors can read opal and UGG tryptophan codon in certain cases. As described by Sambrook et al. (27), a few amber suppressors can also suppress ochre mutations by wobbling. The suppression efficiency varies among these suppressors, with amber suppressors generally showing increased efficiency over ochre and opal suppressors. supE44, an amber suppressor tRNA, is an allele of and is found in many commonly used strains of Escherichia coli K-12. Earlier studies have shown that supE44 is a weak amber suppressor and that its efficiency varies up to 35-fold depending on the reading context of the stop codon (8).Translational accuracy depends on several factors, which include charging of tRNAs with specific amino acids, mRNA decoding, and the presence of antibiotics such as streptomycin and mutations in ribosomal proteins which modulate the fidelity of the translational machinery. Among these, mRNA decoding errors have been reported to occur at a frequency ranging from about 10⁻³ to 10⁻⁴ per codon. Translational misreading errors also largely depend on the competition between cognate and near-cognate tRNA species. Poor availability of cognate tRNAs increases misreading (18).Several studies with E. coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae have shown the readthrough of nonsense codons in suppressor-free cells. In a suppressor-free E. coli strain, it has been shown in vitro that glutamine is incorporated at the nonsense codons UAG and UAA (26). It has been reported that overexpression of wild-type tRNA^Gln in yeast suppresses amber as well as ochre mutations (25). In this study, we have confirmed the presence of an amber suppressor mutation in the glnX gene in a supE44 strain by sequence analysis. This was done essentially because we observed that supE44 could also suppress lacZ ochre mutations, albeit inefficiently. On further investigation using an in vivo luciferase reporter assay system for tRNA-mediated nonsense suppression (28), we found that the efficiency of suppression of amber lesion by supE44 is significantly higher than that reported previously in the literature. An increased ability to suppress ochre and opal nonsense mutations was observed in cells bearing supE44 compared to in the wild type. Such an effect was observed only in the stationary phase and was abolished in logarithmic phase.     

Connection between stop codon reassignment and frequent use of shifty stop frameshifting

Ciliated protozoa of the genus Euplotes have undergone genetic code reassignment, redefining the termination codon UGA to encode cysteine. In addition, Euplotes spp. genes very frequently employ shifty stop frameshifting. Both of these phenomena involve noncanonical events at a termination codon, suggesting they might have a common cause. We recently demonstrated that Euplotes octocarinatus peptide release factor eRF1 ignores UGA termination codons while continuing to recognize UAA and UAG. Here we show that both the Tetrahymena thermophila and E. octocarinatus eRF1 factors allow efficient frameshifting at all three termination codons, suggesting that UGA redefinition also impaired UAA/UAG recognition. Mutations of the Euplotes factor restoring a phylogenetically conserved motif in eRF1 (TASNIKS) reduced programmed frameshifting at all three termination codons. Mutation of another conserved residue, Cys124, strongly reduces frameshifting at UGA while actually increasing frameshifting at UAA/UAG. We will discuss these results in light of recent biochemical characterization of these mutations.     

Construction, expression, and function of a new yeast amber suppressor, tRNATrpA

The number of different tRNA species in Saccharomyces cerevisiae known to be capable of suppressing termination of translation at UAG, UAA, and UGA codons is limited to those which insert tyrosine, leucine, and serine. Suppressor tRNAs that insert other amino acids, even those whose anticodons differ from the expected recognition sequences for nonsense codons by a single nucleotide, have never been identified via classical genetic analysis. We have used site-directed mutagenesis to convert the anticodon of a cloned tRNATrp gene from CCA to CTA with the expectation that this gene would produce tRNA molecules capable of interacting with the UAG terminator codon. We show that this form of the gene can be transcribed and spliced in vitro to produce mature tRNA with the expected base sequence. The putative suppressor gene has been introduced into several S. cerevisiae host strains using the centromere vector YCp19. Efficient suppression of amber mutations met8-1, tyr7-1, and lys2-801 results from the presence of the CTA form of tDNATrp. Two UAA mutants, leu2-1 and ade2-101, and the UGA marker his4-260 are not suppressed.     

Overproduction of release factor reduces spontaneous frameshifting and frameshift suppression by mutant elongation factor Tu.

Mutant forms of elongation factor Tu encoded by tufA8 and tufB103 in Salmonella typhimurium cause suppression of some but not all frameshift mutations. All of the suppressed mutations in S. typhimurium have frameshift windows ending in the termination codon UGA. Because both tufA8 and tufB103 are moderately efficient UGA suppressors, we asked whether the efficiency of frameshifting is influenced by the level of misreading at UGA. We introduced plasmids synthesizing either one of the release factors into strains in which the tuf mutations suppress a test frameshift mutation. We found that overproduction of release factor 2 (which catalyzes release at UGA and UAA) reduced frameshifting promoted by the tuf mutations at all sites tested. However, at one of these sites, trpE91, overproduction of release factor 1 also reduced suppression. The spontaneous level of frameshift "leakiness" at three sites in trpE, each terminating in UGA, was reduced in strains carrying the release factor 2 plasmid. We conclude that both spontaneous and suppressor-enhanced reading-frame shifts are influenced by the activity of peptide chain release factors. However, the data suggest that the effect of release factor on frameshifting does not necessarily depend on the presence of the normal triplet termination signal.     

Identification and nucleotide sequence of the sup8-e UGA-suppressor leucine tRNA from Schizosaccharomyces pombe.

Summary Using the translation of rabbit globin mRNA in wheat germ extracts as an assay for ochre and opal suppression, a UGA suppressor tRNA from Schizosaccharomyces pombe strain sup8-e was purified by column chromatography and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. The purified tRNA can be aminoacylated with leucine by a crude aminoacyl-tRNA synthetase preparation from a wild type S. pombe strain, and has high activity in the suppressor assay. By a combination of post-labeling fingerprinting and rapid gel sequencing methods the nucleotide sequence of this suppressor tRNA was determined to be: pG-C-G-G-C-U-A-U-G-C-C-ac⁴C-G-A-G-D-G-D-G-D-A-A-G-G-G-m ₂ ² G-G-C-A-G-A--U-U^*-C-A-m¹G-C-C-C-U-G-C-U-G-U-U-G-U-A-A-A-A-C-G-m⁵C-G-A-G-A-G-T--C-G-m¹A-A-C-C-U-C-U-C-U-G-G-C-C-G-C-A-C-C-A_OH. The anticodon sequence U^*CA is complementary to the UGA codon. An interesting feature of the suppressor tRNA is an expanded anticodon loop of nine nucleotides owing to an A-C nonpair at the first anticodon stem position.     

Nonsense-mediated decay mutants do not affect programmed -1 frameshifting

Sequences in certain mRNAs program the ribosome to undergo a noncanonical translation event, translational frameshifting, translational hopping, or termination readthrough. These sequences are termed recoding sites, because they cause the ribosome to change temporarily its coding rules. Cis and trans-acting factors sensitively modulate the efficiency of recoding events. In an attempt to quantitate the effect of these factors we have developed a dual-reporter vector using the lacZ and luc genes to directly measure recoding efficiency. We were able to confirm the effect of several factors that modulate frameshift or readthrough efficiency at a variety of sites. Surprisingly, we were not able to confirm that the complex of factors termed the surveillance complex regulates translational frameshifting. This complex regulates degradation of nonsense codon-containing mRNAs and we confirm that it also affects the efficiency of nonsense suppression. Our data suggest that the surveillance complex is not a general regulator of translational accuracy, but that its role is closely tied to the translational termination and initiation processes.     

Identification of the site of translational frameshifting required for production of the transposase encoded by insertion sequence IS 1.

Summary Previous genetic analyses indicated that translational frameshifting in the –1 direction occurs within the run of six adenines in the sequence 5-TTAAAAAACTC-3 at nucleotide positions 305–315 in IS 1, where the two out-of-phase reading frames insA and B-insB overlap, to produce transposase with a polypeptide segment Leu-Lys-Lys-Leu at residues 84–87. IS 1 mutants with a 1 by insertion, which encode mutant transposases with an amino acid substitution within the polypeptide segment at residues 84–87, did not efficiently mediate cointegration, except for an IS 1 mutant which encodes a mutant transposase with a Leu-Arg-Lys-Leu segment instead of Leu-LysLys-Leu. An IS 1 mutant with the DNA segment 5-CTTAAAAACTC-3 at positions 305–315 carrying the termination codon TAA in the B-insB reading frame could still mediate cointegration, indicating that codon AAA for Lys corresponding to second, third and fourth positions in the run of adenines is the site of frameshifting. The -galactosidase activity specified by several IS 1- lacZ fusion plasmids, in which B-insB is in-frame with lacZ, showed that the region 292–377 is sufficient for frameshifting. The protein produced by frameshifting from the IS 1-lacZ plasmid in fact contained the polypeptide segment Leu - Lys - Lys - Leu encoded by the DNA segment 5-TTAAAAAACTC-3, indicating that –1 frameshifting does occur within the run of adenines.     

Modulation of efficiency of translation termination in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Nonsense suppression is a readthrough of premature termination codons. It typically occurs either due to the recognition of stop codons by tRNAs with mutant anticodons, or due to a decrease in the fidelity of translation termination. In the latter case, suppressors usually promote the readthrough of different types of nonsense codons and are thus called omnipotent nonsense suppressors. Omnipotent nonsense suppressors were identified in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae in 1960s, and most of subsequent studies were performed in this model organism. Initially, omnipotent suppressors were localized by genetic analysis to different protein- and RNA-encoding genes, mostly the components of translational machinery. Later, nonsense suppression was found to be caused not only by genomic mutations, but also by epigenetic elements, prions. Prions are self-perpetuating protein conformations usually manifested by infectious protein aggregates. Modulation of translational accuracy by prions reflects changes in the activity of their structural proteins involved in different aspects of protein synthesis. Overall, nonsense suppression can be seen as a “phenotypic mirror” of events affecting the accuracy of the translational machine. However, the range of proteins participating in the modulation of translation termination fidelity is not fully elucidated. Recently, the list has been expanded significantly by findings that revealed a number of weak genetic and epigenetic nonsense suppressors, the effect of which can be detected only in specific genetic backgrounds. This review summarizes the data on the nonsense suppressors decreasing the fidelity of translation termination in S. cerevisiae, and discusses the functional significance of the modulation of translational accuracy.     

A slow-growing, ribosomal mutant of Salmonella typhimurium

Summary The mechanisms of S. typhimurium reversion from histidine dependence (his ^–) to histidine independence (his ⁺) were studied. Genetic and phenotypic characteristics of revertants induced by nitrosoguanidine were analyzed. Among them a class of slow-growing revertants was selected. It is found that all of these slow-growing revertants carry the original UGA nonsense mutation within the histidine operon. They are streptomycin sensitive and no specific suppressor(s) for UGA nonsense codon are demonstrable. The suppression takes place in the absence of conventional nonsense UGA suppressor(s). It is seemingly due to a ribosomal mutation which in turn is likely to produce ambiguity in the process of translation and which suppresses the UGA nonsense codon. The rate of both in vivo and in vitro protein synthesis is significantly reduced. The fact that streptomycin, at sublethal doses, reduced the growth rate of these mutants, probably because of the simultaneous burden of two ambiguity factors, suggests that the mutants described may be regarded as a kind of ram (ribosomal ambiguity) mutants with a his ^– sup ^–genotype. Their capacity to translate poly-U is reduced and in that respect they differ from ram mutants of Escherichia coli.     

Is the in-frame termination signal of the Escherichia coli release factor-2 frameshift site weakened by a particularly poor context?

The synthesis of release factor-2 (RF-2) in bacteria is regulated by a high efficiency +1 frameshifting event at an in-frame UGA stop codon. The stop codon does not specify the termination of synthesis efficiently because of several upstream stimulators for frameshifting. This study focusses on whether the particular context of the stop codon within the frameshift site of the Escherichia coli RF-2 mRNA contributes to the poor efficiency of termination. The context of UGA in this recoding site is rare at natural termination sites in E.coli genes. We have evaluated how the three nucleotides downstream from the stop codon (+4, +5 and +6 positions) in the native UGACUA sequence affect the competitiveness of the termination codon against the frameshifting event. Changing the C in the +4 position and, separately, the A in the +6 position significantly increase the termination signal strength at the frameshift site, whereas the nucleotide in the +5 position had little influence. The efficiency of particular termination signals as a function of the +4 or +6 nucleotides correlates with how often they occur at natural termination sites in E.coli; strong signals occur more frequently and weak signals are less common.     

Dynamics and efficiency in vivo of UGA-directed selenocysteine insertion at the ribosome

The kinetics and efficiency of decoding of the UGA of a bacterial selenoprotein mRNA with selenocysteine has been studied in vivo. A gst-lacZ fusion, with the fdhF SECIS element ligated between the two fusion partners, gave an efficiency of read-through of 4-5%; overproduction of the selenocysteine insertion machinery increased it to 7-10%. This low efficiency is caused by termination at the UGA and not by translational barriers at the SECIS. When the selenocysteine UGA codon was replaced by UCA, and tRNASec with anticodon UGA was allowed to compete with seryl-tRNASer1 for this codon, selenocysteine was found in 7% of the protein produced. When a non-cognate SelB-tRNASec complex competed with EF-Tu for a sense codon, no effects were seen, whereas a non-cognate SelB-tRNASec competing with EF-Tu-mediated Su7-tRNA nonsense suppression of UGA interfered strongly with suppression. The induction kinetics of beta-galactosidase synthesis from fdhF'-'lacZ gene fusions in the absence or presence of SelB and/or the SECIS element, showed that there was a translational pause in the fusion containing the SECIS when SelB was present. The results show that decoding of UGA is an inefficient process and that using the third dimension of the mRNA to accommodate an additional amino acid is accompanied by considerable quantitative and kinetic costs.     

Suppression of nonsense and frameshift mutations obtained by different methods for inactivating the translation termination factor eRF3 in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Mutations in genes of omnipotent nonsense suppressors SUP35 and SUP45 in yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae encoding translation termination factors eRF3 and eRF1, respectively, and prionization of the eRF3 protein may lead to the suppression of some frameshift mutations (CPC mutations). Partial inactivation of the translation termination factor eRF3 was studied in strains with unstable genetically modified prions and also in transgenic yeast S. cerevisiae strains with the substitution of the indigenous SUP35 gene for its homolog from Pichia methanolica or for a recombinant S. cerevisiae SUP35 gene. It was shown that this partial inactivation leads not only to nonsense suppression, but also to suppression of the frameshift lys2-90 mutation. Possible reasons for the correlation between nonsense suppression and suppression of the CPC lys2-90 mutation and mechanisms responsible for the suppression of CPC mutations during inactivation of translation termination factors are discussed.