Genetic analysis of pattern-formation in the embryo ofDrosophila melanogaster

Summary The mutationbicaudal (Bull, 1966) causes embryos to develop a longitudinal mirror image duplication of the posteriormost abdominal segments, while head and thorax are missing. These embryos occur with varying frequencies among eggs laid by mutant females, irrespective of the paternal genotype. Recombination and deletion mapping indicate thatbicaudal (bic) is a recessive, hypomorphic, maternal-effect mutation mapping at a single locus on the second chromosome ofDrosophila melanogaster close tovg (67.0±0.1). The frequency of bicaudal embryos depends on the age of the mother, her genetic constitution and the temperature at which she is raised. Best producers are very young females hemizygous forbic (bic/Df(2)vg ^B ) at 28° C. Under these conditions 80% to 90% of the eggs which differentiate can show the bicaudal embryo phenotype. Upon ageing of the mother the frequency of bicaudal embryos declines rapidly, and most of the eggs develop the normal body pattern. Temperature shift experiments suggest a temperature-sensitive period at the onset of vitellogenesis.The mutation causes several types of abnormalities in the segment pattern of theDrosophila embryo, which are interpreted as various degrees of expression of the mutant character. The most frequent abnormal phenotype is the symmetrical bicaudal embryo with one to five abdominal segments duplicated. Less frequent are asymmetrical types, in which the smaller number of segments is always in the anterior reversed part. Other phenotypes are embryos with missing or rudimentary heads, and embryos with irregular gaps in the segment pattern. In bicaudal embryos, the pole cells, formed at the posterior pole of the egg prior to blastoderm formation, are not duplicated at the anterior. The significance of thebicaudal phenotypes for embryonic pattern-formation inDrosophila is discussed.     

Drosophila segmentation genes and blastoderm cell identities

The formation of the segmentation pattern in Drosophila embryos provides an excellent model for investigating the process of pattern formation in multicellular organisms. Several genes required in an embryo for normal segmentation have been analyzed by classical and molecular genetic and morphological techniques. A detailed consideration of these results suggests that these segmentation genes are combinatorially involved in translating the positional identities of individual cells at an early stage in Drosophila development.     

Localized expression pattern of miR-184 in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis>

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are a kind of endogenous non-coding small RNAs whose specific functions in animals are generally important. Although functions of some miRNAs have been identified, the role of miR-184 remains unknown. Here, we determined the temporal and spatial expression pattern of miR-184 during the different development stages and tissues in Drosophila. Strikingly, miR-184 is expressed ubiquitously in Drosophila embryos, larvae and adults, its expression pattern shows a dynamic changes during the development of embryo, especially in the central nervous system. This expression profile suggests that miR-184 may act important function in Drosophila development.     

Anterior-posterior pattern formation: an evolutionary perspective on genes specifying terminal domains

The Drosophila anterior-posterior pattern genes of the terminal class, particularly the tailless gene, affect structures derived from the acron and the tail region of the embryo. These domains correspond in position and function to asegmental domains at the termini of annelids and more primitive insect embryos. This suggests that terminal genes in Drosophila may have originated in an ancestor common to both annelids and arthropods, and thus that the specification of termini in these metameric organisms is an ancient, evolutionarily conserved process.     

Analysis of the 3-hydroxyl group in Drosophila siRNA function

Members of the RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP) gene family have been shown to be essential for dsRNA-mediated gene silencing based on genetic screens in a variety of organisms, including Caenorhabditis elegans, Arabidopsis, Neurospora, and Dictyostelium. A hallmark of this process is the formation of small 21- to 25-bp dsRNAs, termed siRNAs for small interfering RNAs, which are derived from the dsRNA that initiates gene silencing. We have developed methods to demonstrate that these siRNAs produced in Drosophila embryo extract can be uniformly incorporated into dsRNA in a template-specific manner that is subsequently degraded by RNase III-related enzyme activity to create a second generation of siRNAs. SiRNA function in dsRNA synthesis and mRNA degradation depends upon the integrity of the 3^′-hydroxyl of the siRNA, consistent with the interpretation that siRNAs serve as primers for RdRP activity in the formation of dsRNA. This process of siRNA incorporation into dsRNA followed by degradation and the formation of new siRNAs has been termed “degradative PCR” and the proposed mechanism is consistent with the genetic and biochemical data derived from studies in C. elegans, Arabidopsis, Drosophila, and Dictyostelium. The methods used to study the function of both natural and synthetic siRNAs in RNA interference in Drosophila embryo extracts are detailed. The importance of the 3^′-hydroxyl group for siRNA function and its incorporation into dsRNA is emphasized and the results support a model that places RNA-dependent RNA polymerase as a key mediator in the RNA interference mechanism in Drosophila.     

Development of the Deformed protein pattern in the embryo of the honeybee Apis mellifera L. (Hymenoptera)

Summary We have raised antiserum against part of the Deformed (Dfd) protein of the honeybee and describe here the expression pattern of the Dfd protein during honeybee embryogenesis. Dfd protein is first stained in the prospective gnathal region of the cellular blastoderm. This circumferential band corresponds to the distribution of Dfd mRNA described earlier, and to the blastodermal Dfd expression pattern in Drosophila. Using an antibody against the engrailed (en) protein of Drosophila, we found that at the beginning of gastrulation Dfd expression in the honeybee, as in Drosophila, is restricted to the future intercalary, mandibular and maxillary segments. During gastrulation, the mesodermal nuclei loose the Dfd label gradually from anterior to posterior, and in the ectoderm the most posterior ventral cells loose Dfd while retaining en staining; thus, in contrast to what has been described for Drosophila, the posterior Dfd expression border seems to move forward ventrally to the parasegmental boundary within the maxillary segment. In the late germ band, the lateral tips of the Dfd-expressing band are connected across the dorsal side by a row of amnion cells with strongly staining large nuclei. After dorsal closure, a narrow stripe of Dfd-staining dorsal cells behind the neck region may indicate that the maxillary segment contributes to the dorsal body wall posterior to the head capsule. Thus, apart from some minor deviations, the Dfd expression pattern in the honeybee strongly resembles that in Drosophila prior to head involution. This is compatible with the assumption that head involution (which is a special adaption in higher dipterans) ensues after a rather conserved course of early head development in which Dfd appears to play a basic role. Offprint requests to: R. Fleig     

Segment polarity genes in neuroblast formation and identity specification during Drosophila neurogenesis

The relatively simple central nervous system (CNS) of the Drosophila embryo provides a useful model system for investigating the mechanisms that generate and pattern complex nervous systems. Central to the generation of different types of neurons by precursor neuroblasts is the initial specification of neuroblast identity and the Drosophila segment polarity genes, genes that specify regions within a segment or repeating unit of the Drosophila embryo, have emerged recently as significant players in this process. During neurogenesis the segment polarity genes are expressed in the neuroectodermal cells from which neuroblasts delaminate and they continue to be expressed in neuroblasts and their progeny. Loss-of-function mutations in these genes lead to a failure in the formation of neuroblasts and/or specification of neuroblast identity. Results from several recent studies suggest that regulatory interactions between segment polarity genes during neurogenesis lead to an increase in the number of neuroblasts and specification of different identities to neuroblasts within a population of cells. BioEssays 21:472–485, 1999. © 1999 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Pair-rule and gap gene mutants in the flour beetle Tribolium castaneum

 Early pattern formation in the Drosophila embryo occurs in a syncytial blastoderm where communication between nuclei is unimpeded by cell walls. During the development of other insects, similar gene expression patterns are generated in a cellular environment. In Tribolium, for instance, pair-rule stripes are transiently expressed near the posterior end of the growing germ band. To elucidate how pattern formation in such a situation deviates from that of Drosophila, functional data about the genes involved are essential. In a genetic screen for Tribolium mutants affecting the larval cuticle pattern, we isolated 4 mutants (from a total of 30) which disrupt segmentation in the thorax and abdomen. Two of these mutants display clear pair-rule phenotypes. This demonstrates that not only the expression, but also the function of pair-rule genes in this short-germ insect is in principle similar to Drosophila. The other two mutants appear to identify gap genes. They provide the first evidence for the involvement of gap genes in abdominal segmentation of short-germ embryos. However, significant differences between the phenotypes of these mutants and those of known Drosophila gap mutants exist which indicates that evolutionary changes occurred in either the regulation or action of these genes. Received: 8 May 1998 / Accepted: 17 June 1998     

A cinematographic study of the embryology ofDrosophila melanogaster

Summary In connection with studies on the effect of genetic abnormalities on development, a film was made of the normal development of theDrosophila embryo. Time-lapse motion technique was used, and this made it possible to make new observations on those phases of the development which involve large re-arrangements of the embryonic material, in particular on blastoderm formation, gastrulation and involution of the head. These new observations have been incorporated in an account of the complete development of the embryo up to the time of hatching.     

Studying Drosophila embryogenesis with P-lacZ enhancer trap lines

Summary Embryos of 171 Drosophila lines carrying a P-lacZ insertion on the second or third chromosome were analyzed regarding their pattern of lacZ expression. All lines were selected from a larger screen of about 4000 lines (Bier et al. 1989). Tissue specificity and time of onset of lacZ expression was documented for each line. Thereby, a comprehensive list of markers for the various tissue and cell types of the Drosophila embryo could be assembled. With the help of several P-lacZ lines the development of a number of structures was studied which so far had been described only insufficiently or not at all. In particular, the embryonic origin and early development of the oenocytes, imaginal discs, histoblasts, fat body, dorsal vessel, and perineurial cells was analyzed. Several previously unknown cell types associated with the dorsal vessel, trachea, and epidermis were discovered. By combining data regarding the origin of the different mesodermally derived organs it was possible to generate in some detail a fate map of the mesoderm of the stage 11 Drosophila embryo. Offprint requests to: V. Hartenstein     

Regulation and function of tailless in the long germ wasp Nasonia vitripennis

In the long germ insect Drosophila, the gene tailless acts to pattern the terminal regions of the embryo. Loss of function of this gene results in the deletion of the anterior and posterior terminal structures and the eighth abdominal segment. Drosophila tailless is activated by the maternal terminal system through Torso signaling at both poles of the embryo, with additional activation by Bicoid at the anterior. Here, we describe the expression and function of tailless in a long germ Hymenoptera, the wasp Nasonia vitripennis. Despite the morphological similarities in the mode of development of these two insects, we find major differences in the regulation and function of tailless between Nasonia and Drosophila. In contrast to the fly, Nasonia tll appears to rely on otd for its activation at both poles. In addition, the anterior domain of Nasonia tll appears to have little or no segmental patterning function, while the posterior tll domain has a much more extensive patterning role than its Drosophila counterpart.     

Segmentation (and eve) in very odd insect embryos

The formation of segments in the Drosophila early embryo is understood in greater detail than any other complex developmental process. Now, by studying other types of insect embryo, we can hope to deduce something of the ancestral mechanism of segmentation and the ways in which it has been modified in evolution. The parasitic wasp, Copidosoma floridanum, is spectacularly atypical of insects in that the small egg cell divides extensively, with no initial syncytial phase, and forms eventually some 2000 embryos⁽¹⁾. This process raises intriguing questions about the control of embryonic polarity and segmentation.     

Sequence and expression of DmMKLP1, a homolog of the human MKLP1 kinesin-like protein from Drosophila melanogaster

 We have isolated the Drosophila gene DmMKLP1, which has a high similarity to members of the mitotic kinesin-like subfamily of kinesin proteins. DmMKLP1 has no known close relatives in the Drosophila genome and can therefore be assumed to be the ortholog of human MKLP1 and hamster CHOI kinesin-like proteins. In situ hybridization reveals a homogeneous maternal expression in the early embryo and a terminally restricted expression pattern at blastoderm stage. Later, the expression becomes increasingly restricted to the developing central nervous system, where it remains expressed at least until the end of embryogenesis. Received: 15 April 1998 / Accepted: 7 May 1998     

Developmental effects of monensin on Drosophila melanogaster

Extracellular matrix and membrane proteins and their correct secretion probably are key elements in morphogenesis and differentiation in Drosophila. In this study, we have analysed the effects of monensin, a Na⁺-H⁺-ionophore which blocks normal secretion, applied during cellular blastoderm formation on further development. Normal cell morphology and intercellular contacts are lost and the extracellular matrix becomes disorganized. Gastrulation is blocked and abnormal foldings can be observed. Cuticle phenotypes showed different degrees of ventral, dorsal, head and posterior defects. The results are discussed in the context of what is known about membrane and extracellular matrix proteins in Drosophila.     

Temporal fractal in the feeding behavior ofDrosophila melanogaster

A temporal fractal is clearly shown in the feeding behavior ofDrosophila as a self-similar pattern of locomotive velocity and inverse power law distributions of food dwelling time over the time scale range of 10³. The fractality was observed in the dwelling time distribution immediately after the fly was placed to feeding site or on inferior food in a two-choice situation. Fractality may be understood as adaptive, and an intrinsic property of animal behavior that reflects complex information processing in the CNS ofDrosophila.     

Adaptable doxycycline-regulated gene expression systems for Drosophila

We have engineered two new versions of the doxycycline (dox) inducible system for use in Drosophila. In the first system, we have used the ubiquitously expressed Drosophila actin5C promoter to express the Tet-Off transactivator (tTA) in all tissue. Induction of a luciferase target transgene begins 6 h after placing the flies on dox-free food. Feeding drug-free food to mothers results in universal target gene expression in their embryos. Larvae raised on regular food also show robust expression of a target reporter gene. In the second version, we have used the Gal4-UAS system to spatially limit expression of the transactivator. Dox withdrawal results in temporally- and spatially-restricted, inducible expression of luciferase in the adult head and embryo. Both the actin5C and Gal4-UAS versions produce more than 100-fold induction of luciferase in the adult, with virtually no leaky expression in the presence of drug. Reporter gene expression is also undetectable in larvae or embryos from mothers fed dox-containing food. Such tight control may be due to the incorporation of Drosophila insulator elements (SCS and SCS′) into the transgenic vectors. These systems offer a practical, effective alternative to currently available expression systems in the Drosophila research community.