Bisphosphonates and Osteonecrosis of the Jaw: A Retrospective Study

ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) in patients receiving bisphosphonate therapy and in those who were bisphosphonate naïve.MethodsWe undertook a retrospective review of medical records of patients at the New York Harbor Health Care System from 1999 through 2004. Charts were selected for review if patients had a Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code suggestive of ONJ or if they had ever received bisphosphonate therapy.ResultsAmong 1,951 medical records reviewed, we identified 2 patients with ONJ who had received bisphos-phonates and 2 patients with ONJ who were bisphospho-nate naïve. Both patients treated with bisphosphonates had multiple myeloma and were receiving monthly infusions. They had initially received pamidronate before treatment was changed to zoledronic acid. In each case, ONJ was precipitated by a routine dental extraction. The prevalence of ONJ in our patient population receiving intravenously administered bisphosphonates was 1 in 71.5. Of the 2 cases of ONJ in bisphosphonate-naïve patients, osteora-dionecrosis was clearly incriminated in 1 patient and potentially the causative factor in the other patient as well. No patients receiving orally administered bisphosphonates had ONJ, nor did this complication occur in any patients receiving parenteral bisphosphonate therapy for disorders such as osteoporosis or Paget’s disease of bone.ConclusionBisphosphonates remain an important option for management of metabolic bone disease and complications of malignant disease. The overall prevalence of ONJ in patients receiving bisphosphonates seems to be very low; however, patients receiving intense parenteral therapy for an underlying malignant condition appear to have a uniquely elevated risk for the development of this complication. A causal relationship between bisphosphonates and ONJ remains to be proved and merits further investigation. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:232-238)     

Therapy with Zoledronic Acid, 5 Mg,for a Patient with Paget Disease of Bone

ObjectiveTo describe the effects of an infusion of zoledronic acid in a patient with Paget disease of bone (PD) who had been treated unsuccessfully with several other bisphosphonates.MethodsThe patient’s treatment history is described, and his response to various bisphosphonates, including zoledronic acid, is discussed.ResultsThe patient was a 61-year-old man when a diagnosis of PD was made on the basis of an elevated serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) level of 391 U/L (reference range, 45 to 135). Pagetic bone changes were noted on bone scan and x-ray examinations. Treatment with etidronate had no effect on ALP levels. This intervention was followed by 2 courses of intravenous therapy with pamidronate, which decreased ALP levels by 57% and 55% without inducing a remission. Subsequent oral treatment with alendronate and then risedronate yielded unsustained biochemical remissions of 6 months each. Most recently, therapy with an infusion of 5 mg of zoledronic acid induced a remission that is thus far 20 months in duration. With this therapy, the patient has experienced no side effects, and he has noted a decrease in bone pain.ConclusionThis case study shows that a patient with PD who received successive treatments with several bisphosphonates with inadequate responses or only brief remissions was more effectively treated with a single 5-mg infusion of zoledronic acid. This patient’s therapeutic responses illustrate the relative efficacy of available bisphosphonates and the potential for longer-lasting remissions with zoledronic acid in patients with PD. (Endocr Pract. 2008;14:607-610)     

Treatment of Osteoporosis and Prevention of New Fractures: Role of Intravenously Administered Bisphosphonates

ObjectiveTo evaluate the usefulness of intravenously administered bisphosphonates for improving absorption, tolerability, adherence, and outcomes in the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis.MethodsData published from 1996 to 2009 relevant to the treatment of osteoporosis, with emphasis on bisphosphonates, fracture risk, adherence to therapy, frequency of dosing, intravenous treatment, tolerability, cost-effectiveness, and quality of life, were reviewed.ResultsAlthough bisphosphonates are currently the standard of care for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoporosis in men, oral formulations are associated with poor absorption and potential irritation of the upper gastrointestinal tract. These issues necessitate complicated and restrictive dosing regimens, which in turn lead to poor compliance and persistence. Intravenous formulations such as 3 mg of ibandronate given quarterly and 5 mg of zoledronic acid administered once yearly avoid problems relating to absorption and tolerability by bypassing the gastrointestinal tract. Intravenously administered ibandronate is presumed (by virtue of similar or superior improvements in bone mineral density) to have antifracture efficacy similar to that of orally administered ibandronate given daily, which has been shown to produce significant reductions in vertebral fractures during a 3-year period in comparison with placebo. Zoledronic acid, 5 mg once yearly, has been shown to produce a significant reduction in the risk of morphometric vertebral fractures, clinical vertebral fractures, hip fractures, and nonvertebral fractures versus placebo during a 3-year interval in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis and also to yield a significantly decreased risk for new clinical fractures versus placebo in patients with recent low-trauma hip fracture. Both agents have favorable safety and tolerability profiles.ConclusionIntravenously administered bisphosphonates have the potential to increase compliance and persistence with therapy in patients with osteoporosis and to improve patient outcomes. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:483-493)     

Effect of Vitamin D Therapy on Bone Turnover Markers in Postmenopausal Women with Osteoporosis and Osteopenia

ObjectiveTo (7) assess the rate of reduction in bone turnover with vitamin D and bisphosphonate therapies and (2) evaluate the clinical utility of bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (BSAP) in monitoring treatment response.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients with newly diagnosed osteopenia and osteoporosis from 2002 to 2009 at Loyola University Medical Center. A cohort of postmenopausal women with hip or spine T-scores of less than -1, normal serum creatinine, and no prior vitamin D or bisphosphonate therapy was divided into vitamin D-deficient (n = 29) and vitamin D-sufficient (n = 13) groups. Vitamin D-deficient patients received high-dose vitamin D, whereas vitamin D-sufficient patients received orally administered bisphosphonates. BSAP levels at baseline and 1 year were compared.Resultsvitamin D therapy in the group with vitamin D deficiency led to a 26.7% decrease in BSAP (P < .01). Bisphosphonate therapy in the vitamin D-sufficient group led to a 32.7% decrease in BSAP (P = .01). The magnitude of BSAP change in the 2 study groups (6.74 ± 6.48 μg ∕ L and 8.72 ± 9.94 μgZL) did not differ significantly (P = .45).ConclusionThe results of this study suggest that correction of vitamin D deficiency in patients with osteopenia and osteoporosis can lead to a decrease in bone turnover as measured by BSAP and that the magnitude of this reduction is similar to that achieved with orally administered bisphosphonates. (Endocr Pract. 2011;17:873-879)     

Patterns of Bisphosphonates Utilization in Patients under Age 45 in a Large Cohort of Commercial Insurance Beneficiaries in the United States

Background

The effectiveness and safety of bisphosphonates treatment used in the young population have not been well studied. Despite insufficient data on effectiveness and safety of bisphosphonates in young patients, bisphosphonates are still considered in younger patients at high risk for osteoporosis or fracture. The objectives of this study were to identify bisphosphonate initiators aged 10–45 years and describe their clinical characteristics and to assess time trends of bisphosphonate use over the past decade in a large U.S. population-based cohort.

Methods

Using the medical and pharmacy claims data from a U.S. commercial insurance (2003–2012), patients aged 10–45 years without malignancy who initiated an oral or intravenous bisphosphonate after at least 1 year of insurance enrollment were selected. Baseline demographics, comorbidities, medications and health care utilization were assessed in the year prior to initiating a bisphosphonate. The trend of bisphosphonate use over time was examined.

Results

There were 9,082 bisphosphonate initiators (0.02% of the same age group in the population). The mean age was 38.1 years and 79.6% female. Osteoporosis was the most common diagnosis (41.2%). At baseline, 10.8% had a diagnosis of fracture and 29.0% had a bone mineral density measured. Of those who used glucocorticoids (39%) at baseline, the mean 1-year cumulative prednisone-equivalent dose was 2,669 milligrams. The use of bisphosphonates in the young population significantly decreased over the past decade (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Among young patients aged 10–45, the use of bisphosphonates was uncommon and significantly decreased over the past decade in the U.S. While most patients initiating bisphosphonates had a diagnosis of osteoporosis and fracture in the preceding year, some had no recorded claims with a diagnosis of fracture, osteoporosis, or long-term glucocorticoids use at baseline. Future research is needed to examine the effectiveness and safety of bisphosphonates in young patients at risk for osteoporosis.     

Switching to Denosumab or Bisphosphonates After Completion of Teriparatide Treatment in Women With Severe Postmenopausal Osteoporosis

ObjectiveTo compare bone mineral density (BMD) changes after 12 months of treatment with denosumab or bisphosphonates in postmenopausal women with severe osteoporosis after stopping teriparatide therapy.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 140 postmenopausal women (mean age, 74.2 years) with severe osteoporosis who had been treated with teriparatide for 18 to 24 months at our outpatient clinic in a tertiary endocrine center between 2006 and 2015. After stopping teriparatide therapy, they continued treatment with a bisphosphonate (alendronate, risedronate, ibandronate, or zoledronic acid) or denosumab while receiving daily vitamin D and calcium. BMD at the lumbar spine (LS), total hip (TH), and femoral neck (FN) was measured by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry when teriparatide therapy was discontinued (baseline) and after 12 months of further treatment. Multivariate linear regression models were used to identify the predictors of BMD gain.ResultsAfter stopping teriparatide therapy, 70 women continued treatment with bisphosphonates and 70 received denosumab. LS, but not TH or FN, BMD gain was significantly greater in the denosumab group than in the bisphosphonates group at 12 months. Multivariate analysis showed that BMD gain at the LS was negatively associated with bisphosphonate versus denosumab treatment and positively associated with baseline serum total procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide. BMD gains at the FN were predicted by higher baseline serum urate levels. BMD gains at the TH and FN were negatively associated with pretreatment BMD gains at the same site.ConclusionTwelve months after stopping teriparatide therapy, sequential denosumab treatment appeared to yield higher additional LS BMD gain on average compared with bisphosphonates treatment.     

Long-Term Follow-up of patients on Drug Holiday from Bisphosphonates: Real-World Setting

ObjectiveAtypical femoral fractures and osteoporosis of the jaw have been associated with prolonged bisphosphonate therapy for postmenopausal osteoporosis. American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists guidelines suggest a drug holiday after 4 to 5 years of bisphosphonate treatment for moderate-risk patients and 10 years for high-risk patients, but there are minimal data on safe holiday durations. A recent U.S. Food and Drug Administration perspective suggests a treatment duration of 3 to 5 years. Our aim was to describe a group of patients on drug holiday and identify fracture risk.MethodsA retrospective chart review was conducted of 209 patients who started a bisphosphonate drug holiday between 2005 and 2010. Collected data included bone mineral density (BMD), markers of bone turnover, vitamin D status, and clinical and radiographic reports of fractures.ResultsEleven of 209 patients (5.2%) developed a fracture. Their mean age was 69.36 years (±15.58), and the mean lumbar spine and femoral neck T-scores were −2.225 (±1.779) and −2.137 (±0.950), respectively. All patients had a significant increase in bone-specific alkaline phosphatase at 6 months, which was more pronounced in the fracture group (3.0 ± 0.6083 μg/L vs. 1.16 ± 1.9267 μg/L). Over 4 years, there was no significant change in mean lumbar spine BMD for the entire cohort, but there was a statistically significant decline in the femoral neck BMD at year 2 (−0.0084 ± 0.03 gm/cm²).ConclusionThe current practice of initiating BP holidays needs further evaluation, particularly in the real-world setting. Elderly patients and those with very low BMD warrant close follow-up during a drug holiday. A fracture, early significant rise in bone turnover markers, and/or a decline in BMD should warrant resumption of osteoporosis therapy. (Endocr Pract. 2013;19:989-994)     

Neurologic Complications of Paget Disease of Bone

ObjectiveTo review the epidemiology, evaluation, and management of the neurologic complications associated with Paget disease of bone (PDB).MethodsWe reviewed the English-language medical literature using MEDLINE data sources from 1950 to August 2008 and manually searched cross-references from original articles and reviews. Search terms included “Paget* disease of bone” and “neurologic* complications,” “cranial nerve,” “spinal cord,” or “peripheral nerve.”ResultsSeveral neurologic problems in the central and peripheral nervous systems may complicate PDB. Up to 76% of patients may have some form of neurologic involvement. Neurologic complications can occur in patients with a long history of PDB as well as in patients with previously unrecognized disease. The primary mechanisms of nerve damage in PDB involving the spine are ischemic myelitis and compression due to bone hypertrophy. Evaluation includes determining the serum alkaline phosphatase level and imaging by radiography, bone scintigraphy, computed tomographic scanning, and, for lesions of the central nervous system, magnetic resonance imaging. If a soft-tissue mass is found, biopsy should be considered to exclude the presence of sarcoma. Treatment strategies include calcium, vitamin D, bisphosphonates, and possibly surgical intervention for refractory cases.ConclusionNeurologic sequelae of PDB may be underappreciated. Despite the paucity of data guiding treatment, zoledronic acid is a reasonable first-line therapy. Lack of response to treatment or relapse should prompt diagnostic reevaluation with a heightened suspicion for tumor. (Endocr Pract. 2009;15:158-166)     

Effect of Bisphosphonates on Fracture Incidence in Young Adults With Low Bone Density

ObjectiveTo assess the effect of bisphosphonates on fracture incidence in young adults over a 5-year follow-up period.MethodsBased on the Kaiser Permanente electronic health record, this retrospective study investigated patients aged 19 to 40 years with abnormal bone density (either any Z-score of ≤−2 standard deviation [SD] or any T-score of ≤−2.5 SD). The incidence and time to fracture between the control (patients with <6 months of bisphosphonate exposure) and treatment (patients with ≥6 months of bisphosphonate use within 4 years of their first dual energy x-ray absorptiometry scan) groups were compared. Comparisons were analyzed with Χ² test for categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables.ResultsA total of 422 patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fractures occurred in 18 patients (5.0%) of the control group (n = 358) and 5 patients (7.8%) of the treatment group (n = 64; P = .37). T-scores were significantly lower in the treatment group (−2.53 ± 0.58 SD) than those in the control group (−2.30 ± 0.80 SD; P = .002) but did not correlate with fracture risk. No significant differences were found in total fracture incidence (hazard ratio = 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-6.26). Similarly, no correlation was noted between the length of bisphosphonate therapy and fracture incidence (odds ratio = 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.966-1.026).ConclusionIn summary, we did not find a clear correlation of fracture incidence with the use of bisphosphonates in young adults. Further research into the pathophysiology, specific etiologies, and treatment options in this population is needed.     

Increase in Bone Mass After Correction of Vitamin D Insufficiency in Bisphosphonate-Treated Patients

ObjectiveTo assess the relative contribution of vitamin D insufficiency to loss of bone mineral density (BMD) in patients taking bisphosphonates.MethodsPatients were eligible for inclusion if they had osteoporosis or osteopenia and demonstrated a decline in BMD during the preceding year while taking stable doses of alendronate or risedronate, plus supplemental calcium and vitamin D. Patients with previously known secondary causes of osteoporosis were excluded from the study. Eligible patients underwent prospective measurement of bilateral hip and lumbar spine BMD by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25-OHD), 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D, intact parathyroid hormone, osteocalcin, and thyroid-stimulating hormone (thyrotropin), and urinary calcium:creatinine ratio.ResultsAnnual BMD was assessed in 175 previously bisphosphonate-responsive patients with low BMD. Of the 175 patients, 136 (78%) had either a significant interval increase or no change in BMD, whereas 39 (22%) had a significant decrease. Of the 39 patients who lost BMD, 20 (51%) had vitamin D insufficiency (25-OHD < 30 ng/mL). After a single course of orally administered vitamin D₂ (500,000 IU during a 5-week period), the 25-OHD level returned to normal in 17 of the 20 vitamin D-insufficient patients and was associated with significant (P < .02) 3.0% and 2.7% increases in BMD at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck, respectively. Failure to normalize the serum 25-OHD level was associated with further loss of BMD.ConclusionVitamin D insufficiency was the most frequently identified cause of bone loss in patients with declining BMD during bisphosphonate therapy. Correction of vitamin D insufficiency in these patients led to a significant rebound in BMD. (Endocr Pract. 2008; 14:293-297)     

Zoledronic Acid Treatment of Osteoporosis: Effects in Men

ObjectiveTo study changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and a bone resorption marker in elderly men who received off-label zoledronic acid for osteoporosis treatment.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective review of medical records of 50 male veterans who had received at least one 4-mg intravenous infusion of zoledronic acid and had BMD measurements at 2 of 3 skeletal sites both before the infusion and at a mean of 2.2 years after the infusion. Patients were classified into those who had never received bisphosphonate therapy versus those who had previously received such treatment.ResultsIn our study population, 66% of patients had been prescribed orally administered bisphosphonates or intravenously administered pamidronate before receiving zoledronic acid. Larger increases in spine BMD (6.7% versus 3.4% [P < .05]; per year: 2.8% versus 1.2% [P < .01]) and total hip BMD (3.2% versus 0.1% [P < .03]; per year: 1.3% versus 0.02% [P < .02]) occurred after infusion of zoledronic acid in bisphosphonate-naïve patients in comparison with those who had previous bisphosphonate exposure. In addition, 26 of 50 patients (52%) had suppressed urinary N-terminal telopeptide of cross-linked collagen type I (NTx) (a bone turnover marker) at 12 months, and 5 men had NTx suppression for 24 months after infusion.ConclusionOur data suggest that 4 mg of intravenously administered zoledronic acid is an effective treatment for increasing BMD in a “real-world” population of men with osteoporosis. The prolonged suppression of urinary NTx after zoledronic acid infusion raises the question of whether this treatment could be given less frequently than every year. The changes seen in BMD during a mean period of 2 years were similar to those reported in clinical studies with alendronate therapy in men and zoledronic acid treatment in women. (Endocr Pract. 2010;16:960-967)     

Managing Bone Health in Breast Cancer

ObjectiveOsteoporosis is a common condition that can be caused or exacerbated by estrogen deficiency.MethodsThis narrative review will discuss optimizing bone health in the setting of adjuvant endocrine treatments for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer and the current use of antiresorptive agents as adjuvant therapy and as bone modifying agents.ResultsAdjuvant endocrine treatments for hormone receptor–positive breast cancer (tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors) affect bone health. The exact effect depends on the agent used and the menopausal state of the woman. Antiresorptive medications for osteoporosis, bisphosphonates and denosumab, lower the risk of bone loss from aromatase inhibitors. Use of bisphosphonates as adjuvant treatment in breast cancer, regardless of hormone receptor status, is increasing because of benefits seen to cancer relapse and survival.ConclusionOptimizing bone health in women with breast cancer during and after cancer treatment is informed by an understanding of breast cancer treatment and its skeletal effect.     

The Stumble—From Pipe Cleaner to Bone Builder

ObjectiveTo review the history of the transition of bisphosphonate use from bench chemistry to clinical applications.MethodsPertinent medical literature, including limited-distribution as well as peer-reviewed publications, was reviewed.ResultsBisphosphonates were originally developed to interfere with calcium deposition. An expanded understanding of bone physiology, as well as a growing appreciation of bisphosphonate chemistry, allowed a broadening range of clinical applications.ConclusionThe use of bisphosphonates in clinical medicine depended on a series of fortuitous events that, at the time, were “stumbles,” not unlike the discoveries of Fleming and Newton. The logical sequence is more apparent in retrospect. (Endocr Pract. 2007;13:194-197)     

Efectos del tratamiento con ácido zoledrónico en pacientes adultos con osteogénesis imperfecta

Background and objectiveOsteogenesis imperfecta (OI) is a genetic disorder that results in bone fragility. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of bisphosphonate therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of intravenous zoledronic acid on bone mineral density (BMD) and biochemical markers of bone turnover in adults with OI.Material and methodsWe carried out a prospective non-randomized study in patients with osteoporosis or severe osteopenia (T score <?2) related to OI and intolerance or contraindication to oral bisphosphonates. The patients were treated with a zoledronic acid infusion every 6 months. Densitometry was carried out annually. Calcium (Ca), phosphate (P), intact parathormone (PTH), 25 hydroxyvitamin D and biochemical markers of bone turnover [bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP), beta-cross-laps (CTX) and urinary deoxypyridoxine (DOP)] were measured every year. Adverse events and new fractures were registered.ResultsTen patients (2 men and 8 women) were treated. Treatment increased BMD measured in the lumbar spine after 24 (0.738±0.141 vs 0.788±0.144 g/cm²; p=0.048) and 36 months (0.720±0.139 vs 0.820±0.128; p=0.01). Significant increases in BMD were also observed after 24 months in the femoral neck (0.677±0.121 vs 0.703±0.122 g/cm²; p<0.016). Serum Ca, P, BAP and CTX concentrations remained unchanged. PTH concentrations increased and vitamin D concentrations decreased after 36 months of treatment. DOP excretion decreased significantly after 24 months. Seven patients had mild influenza-like symptoms occurring within the first 24 h after the first infusion. No severe adverse events were observed. None of the patients had new fractures.ConclusionZoledronic acid seems to be a safe and effective treatment option in adults with osteoporosis related to OI.     

Effectiveness of Bisphosphonate Analogues and Functional Electrical Stimulation on Attenuating Post-Injury Osteoporosis in Spinal Cord Injury Patients- a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Various pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic approaches have been applied to reduce sublesional bone loss after spinal cord injury (SCI), and the results are inconsistent across the studies. The objective of this meta-analysis was to investigate whether the two most-studied interventions, bisphosphonate analogues and functional electrical stimulation (FES), could effectively decrease bone mineral density (BMD) attenuation and/or restore lost BMD in the SCI population.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials, quasi-experimental studies, and prospective follow-up studies employing bisphosphonates or FES to treat post-SCI osteoporosis were identified in PubMed and Scopus. The primary outcome was the percentage of BMD change from baseline measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or computed tomography (CT). Data were extracted from four points: the 3rd, 6th, 12th, and 18th month after intervention.

Results

A total of 19 studies were included in the analysis and involved 364 patients and 14 healthy individuals. Acute SCI participants treated with bisphosphonate therapy demonstrated a trend toward less bone loss than participants who received placebos or usual care. A significant difference in BMD decline was noted between both groups at the 3rd and 12th month post-medication. The subgroup analysis failed to show the superiority of intravenous bisphosphonate over oral administration. Regarding FES training, chronic SCI patients had 5.96% (95% CI, 2.08% to 9.84%), 7.21% (95%CI, 1.79% to 12.62%), and 9.56% (95% CI, 2.86% to 16.26%) increases in BMD at the 3rd, 6th, and 12th months post-treatment, respectively. The studies employing FES ≥5 days per week were likely to have better effectiveness than studies using FES ≤3 days per week.

Conclusions

Our meta-analysis indicated bisphosphonate administration early following SCI effectively attenuated sublesional bone loss. FES intervention for chronic SCI patients could significantly increase sublesional BMD near the site of maximal mechanical loading.     

Zoledronic Acid Therapy of Patients With Paget Disease of Bone Resistant to or With Unsustained Remission Following Prior Bisphosphonate Therapy

Objective: To evaluate the effect of zoledronic acid (ZA) in patients with Paget disease (PD) who had not had a biochemical remission with prior bisphosphonate therapy or had a remission ≤12 months.Methods: The effects of ZA therapy were studied in 14 patients aged 54 to 90. Serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels were elevated to at least 40% above the normal reference range, and glomerular filtration rates (GFRs) were ≥40 mL/minute. ZA (5 mg) was infused over 15 minutes. ALP and urine N-telopeptide/creatinine (NTx/Cr) were obtained before therapy and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and thereafter at 4-month intervals.Results: At baseline, ALP ranged from 141 to 1,009 U/L. In 13 patients, ALP fell to normal following ZA administration. Remissions occurred in 9 patients who had not previously had a remission. Remissions varied from 12 to 60 months and were more prolonged in 4 patients with prior remissions ≤12 months. ZA failed to induce a remission in 1 patient. Ten to 12 days after therapy in 3 asymptomatic patients, serum calcium levels fell to 7.9, 8, and 8.3 mg/dL. Other than flu-like symptoms in 3 patients after ZA infusion, there were no other adverse effects.Conclusion: Therapy with ZA induced remissions in 13/14 patients and induced more prolonged remissions in patients who previously had remissions ≤12 months. The lack of remission in 1 patient despite 2 courses of therapy is evidence of a continuing therapeutic challenge for some patients with a more resistant form of PD.Abbreviations: ALP = alkaline phosphatase Cr = creatinine NTx = N-telopeptide 25-OHD = 25-hydroxyvitamin D PD = Paget disease ZA = zoledronic acid     

Dental implications of bisphophonate-related osteonecrosis

doi: 10.1111/j.1741‐2358.2012.00622.x
Dental implications of bisphophonate‐related osteonecrosis Objectives: The aim is to explore the current theories about clinical , pathological and dental management of bisphosphonate related osteonecrosis of the jaws. Also discussed are the actions of bisphosphonates, pathogenesis related to the susceptibility of jaws, the predisposing risk factors for the development of bisphosphonate‐related osteonecrosis of the jaws (BRONJ) and diagnostic criteria based on the literature review. Discussion: Osteoporosis is a disease that generally affects the mineral status of both cortical and trabecular bone in post menopausal women. Bisphosphonates are a group of drugs that preserve and increase bone mass. Bisphosphonate drugs are classified according to use and method of delivery. The bisphosphonates used for the treatment of osteoporosis are taken orally. Little is known about the side effects and dangers of the long‐term use of therapeutic doses of Bisphosphonates. A recent complication reported is osteonecrosis of jaws. The use of IV bisphosphonates for multiple myeloma and metastatic bone diseases suggests that dosage, length of treatment, and route of administration, as well as cofactors such as use of glucocorticoids and immunosuppressive agents, and dental surgery, could all be related to the incidence of BRONJ. This review provides an update on current knowledge about clinical, pathological and management aspects of BRONJ. Conclusions: Little evidence exists to direct the prosthodontic management of patients with a history of bisphosphonate use. Patients with active osteonecrosis related to bisphosphonate use have reduced tissue tolerance to function with removable prostheses and decreased potential for osseointegration of dental implants. Decisions should be based on clinical judgment tempered by the presenting conditions, medical profile, and patient needs. A better understanding would help in a dental setting to prevent any complication and help to improve the prognosis for those being treated for osteoradionecrosis.Until further evidence emerges regarding management of patients with active bisphosphonate‐ related osteonecrosis, conservative prosthodontic treatment is reasonable and prudent.     

Oral Bisphosphonates and Risk of Atrial Fibrillation and Flutter in Women: A Self-Controlled Case-Series Safety Analysis

Background

A recent trial unexpectedly reported that atrial fibrillation, when defined as serious, occurred more often in participants randomized to an annual infusion of the relatively new parenteral bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, than among those given placebo, but had limited power. Two subsequent population-based case-control studies of patients receiving a more established oral bisphosphonate, alendronic acid, reported conflicting results, possibly due to uncontrolled confounding factors.

Methodology/Principal Findings

We used the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database to assess the risk of atrial fibrillation and flutter in women exposed to the oral bisphosphonates, alendronic acid and risedronate sodium. The self-controlled case-series method was used to minimise the potential for confounding. The age-adjusted incidence rate ratio for atrial fibrillation or flutter in individuals during their exposure to these oral bisphosphonates (n = 2195) was 1.07 (95% CI 0.94–1.21). The age-adjusted incidence rate ratio for alendronic acid (n = 1489) and risedronate sodium (n = 649) exposed individuals were 1.09 (95% CI 0.93–1.26) and 0.99 (95% CI 0.78–1.26) respectively. In post-hoc analyses, an increased risk of incident atrial fibrillation or flutter was detected for patients during their first few months of alendronic acid therapy.

Conclusions/Significance

We found no robust evidence of an overall long-term increased risk of atrial fibrillation or flutter associated with continued exposure to the oral bisphosphonates, alendronic acid and risedronate sodium. A possible signal for an increase in risk during the first few months of therapy with alendronic acid needs to be re-assessed in additional studies.