Identification of the RNA binding segment of human U1 A protein and definition of its binding site on U1 snRNA.

The interaction between the U1 snRNP-specific U1 A protein and U1 snRNA has been analysed. The binding site for the protein on the RNA is shown to be in hairpin II, which extends from positions 48 to 91 in the RNA. Within this hairpin the evolutionarily conserved loop sequence is crucial for interaction with U1 A protein. U1 A protein can also bind the loop sequence when it is part of an artificial RNA which cannot form a stable hairpin structure. The region of the protein required to bind to U1 snRNA consists of a conserved 80 amino acid motif, previously identified in many ribonucleoprotein (RNP) proteins, together with (maximally) 11 N-terminal and 10 C-terminal flanking amino acids. Point mutations introduced into two of the most highly conserved regions of this motif abolish RNA binding. U1 snRNA mutants from which the U1 A binding site has been deleted are shown to be capable of assembly into RNP particles which are immunoprecipitable by patient antisera which recognize U1 A protein. The role of RNA-protein and protein-protein interactions in U snRNP assembly are discussed.     

Molecular characterization of the spliceosomal proteins U1A and U2B" from higher plants.

In addition to their role in pre-mRNA splicing, the human spliceosomal proteins U1A and U2B" are important models of how RNP motif-containing proteins execute sequence-specific RNA binding. Genes encoding U1A and U2B" have been isolated from potato and thereby provide the only evolutionary comparison available for both proteins and represent the only full-length genes encoding plant spliceosomal proteins to have been cloned and characterized. In vitro RNA binding experiments revealed the ability of potato U2B" to interact with human U2A' to enhance sequence-specific binding and to distinguish cognate RNAs of either plant or animal origin. A comparison of the sequence of U1A and U2B" proteins indicated that multiple residues which could affect RNP motif conformation probably govern the specific distinction in RNA binding by these proteins. Since human U1A modulates polyadenylation in vertebrates, the possibility that plant U1A might be exploited in the characterization of this process in plants was examined. However, unlike vertebrate U1A, neither U1A from potato nor Arabidopsis bound their own mRNA and no evidence for binding to upstream efficiency elements in polyadenylation signals was obtained, suggesting that plant U1A is not involved in polyadenylation.     

Identification of molecular contacts between the U1 A small nuclear ribonucleoprotein and U1 RNA.

We recently determined the crystal structure of the RNP domain of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein A and identified Arg and Lys residues involved in U1 RNA binding. These residues are clustered around the two highly conserved segments, RNP1 and RNP2, located in the central two beta strands. We have now studied the U1 RNA binding of mutants where potentially hydrogen bonding residues on the RNA binding surface were replaced by non-hydrogen bonding residues. In the RNP2 segment, the Thr11----Val and Asn15----Val mutations completely abolished, and the Tyr13----Phe and Asn16----Val mutations substantially reduced the U1 RNA binding, suggesting that these residues form hydrogen bonds with the RNA. In the RNP1 segment Arg52----Gln abolished, but Arg52----Lys only slightly affected U1 RNA binding, suggesting that Arg52 may form a salt bridge with phosphates of U1 RNA. Ethylation protection experiments of U1 RNA show that the backbone phosphates of the 3' two-thirds of loop II and the 5' stem are in contact with the U1 A protein. The U1 A protein-U1 RNA binding constant is substantially reduced by A----G and G----A replacements in loop II, but not by C----U or U----C replacements. Based on these biochemical data we propose a structure for the complex between the U1 A ribonucleoprotein and U1 RNA.     

Recognition of U1 and U2 small nuclear RNAs can be altered by a 5-amino-acid segment in the U2 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP) B" protein and through interactions with U2 snRNP-A'' protein.

We have investigated the sequence elements influencing RNA recognition in two closely related small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP) proteins, U1 snRNP-A and U2 snRNP-B". A 5-amino-acid segment in the RNA-binding domain of the U2 snRNP-B" protein was found to confer U2 RNA recognition when substituted into the corresponding position in the U1 snRNP-A protein. In addition, B", but not A, was found to require the U2 snRNP-A' protein as an accessory factor for high-affinity binding to U2 RNA. The pentamer segment in B" that conferred U2 RNA recognition was not sufficient to allow the A' enhancement of U2 RNA binding by B", thus implicating other sequences in this protein-protein interaction. Sequence elements involved in these interactions have been localized to variable loops of the RNA-binding domain as determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (D. Hoffman, C.C. Query, B. Golden, S.W. White, and J.D. Keene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, in press). These findings suggest a role for accessory proteins in the formation of RNP complexes and pinpoint amino acid sequences that affect the specificity of RNA recognition in two members of a large family of proteins involved in RNA processing.     

The association of the U1-specific 70K and C proteins with U1 snRNPs is mediated in part by common U snRNP proteins.

The U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle (snRNP)-specific 70K and A proteins are known to bind directly to stem-loops of the U1 snRNA, whereas the U1-C protein does not bind to naked U1 snRNA, but depends on other U1 snRNP protein components for its association. Focusing on the U1-70K and U1-C proteins, protein-protein interactions contributing to the association of these particle-specific proteins with the U1 snRNP were studied. Immunoprecipitation of complexes formed after incubation of naked U1 snRNA or purified U1 snRNPs lacking their specific proteins (core U1 snRNP) with in vitro translated U1-C protein, revealed that both common snRNP proteins and the U1-70K protein are required for the association of U1-C with the U1 snRNP. Binding studies with various in vitro translated U1-70K mutants demonstrated that the U1-70K N-terminal domain is necessary and sufficient for the interaction of U1-C with core U1 snRNPs. Surprisingly, several N-terminal fragments of the U1-70K protein, which lacked the U1-70K RNP-80 motif and did not bind naked U1 RNA, associated stably with core U1 snRNPs. This suggests that a new U1-70K binding site is generated upon association of common U1 snRNP proteins with U1 RNA. The interaction between the N-terminal domain of U1-70K and the core RNP domain was specific for the U1 snRNP; stable binding was not observed with core U2 or U5 snRNPs, suggesting essential structural differences among snRNP core domains. Evidence for direct protein-protein interactions between U1-specific proteins and common snRNP proteins was supported by chemical crosslinking experiments using purified U1 snRNPs. Individual crosslinks between the U1-70K and the common D2 or B'/B protein, as well as between U1-C and B'/B, were detected. A model for the assembly of U1 snRNP is presented in which the complex of common proteins on the RNA backbone functions as a platform for the association of the U1-specific proteins.     

The U2B'''' RNP motif as a site of protein-protein interaction.

The U2 snRNP contains two specific proteins, U2B' and U2A'. Neither of these proteins, on its own, is capable of specific interactions with U2 RNA. Here, a complex between U2B' and U2A' that forms in the absence of RNA is identified. Analysis of mutant forms of U2B' shows that the smallest fragment able to bind specifically U2 RNA (amino acids 1-88) is also the minimal region required for complex formation with U2A', and implies that this region must be largely structurally intact for U2A' interaction. Although this truncated U2B' fragment is capable of making specific protein--RNA and protein-protein interactions its structure, as measured by the ability to bind to U2A', appears to depend on the rest of the protein. Hybrids between U2B' and the closely related U1A protein are used to localize U2B' specific amino acids involved in protein-protein interaction. These can be divided into two functional groups. U2A' interaction with U2B' amino acids 37-46 permits binding to U2 RNA whereas interaction with U2B' specific amino acids between positions 14 and 25 reduces non-specific binding to U1 RNA. These two proteins may serve as a general example of how RNA binding may be modulated by protein-protein interaction in the assembly of RNPs, particularly since the region of U2' involved in interaction with U2A' consists mainly of a conserved RNP motif.     

Functional analysis of SNF, the Drosophila U1A/U2B" homolog: identification of dispensable and indispensable motifs for both snRNP assembly and function in vivo

In Drosophila, the spliceosomal protein SNF fulfills the functions of two vertebrate proteins, U1 snRNP-UlA and U2 snRNP-U2B". The structure and sequence of SNF, U1A, and U2B" are nearly identical with two RNA recognition motifs (RRM) separated by a short linker region, yet they have different RNA-binding properties: U1A binds U1 snRNA, U2B" binds U2 snRNA, and SNF binds both snRNAs. Structure/function studies on the human proteins have identified motifs in the N-terminal RRM that are critical for RNA-binding specificity but have failed to identify a function for the C-terminal RRM. Interestingly, SNF is chimeric in these motifs, suggesting a basis for its dual specificity. Here, we test the importance of these motifs by introducing site-directed mutations in the snf coding region and examining the effects of these mutations on assembly into the snRNP and on snf function in vivo. We found that an N-terminal RRM mutant protein predicted to eliminate RNA binding still assembles into snRNPs and is capable of rescuing snf's lethal phenotype only if the normally dispensable C-terminal RRM is present. We also found that the mixed motif in the "RNA-specificity" domain is necessary for SNF's dual function whereas the mixed motif in the U2A'-protein-binding region is not. Finally, we demonstrate that animals carrying a snf mutation that converts SNF from a bifunctional protein to a U1 snRNP-specific protein are viable. This unexpected result suggests that SNF's presence within the U2 snRNP is not essential for splicing.     

Prediction of a new class of RNA recognition motif

The observation that activation domains (AD) of procarboxypeptidases are rather long compared to the pro-regions of other zymogens raises the possibility that they could play additional roles apart from precluding enzymatic activity within the proenzyme and helping in its folding process. In the present work, we compared the overall pro-domain tertiary structure with several proteins belonging to the same fold in the structural classification of proteins (SCOP) database by using structure and sequence comparisons. The best score obtained was between the activation domain of human procarboxypeptidase A4 (ADA4h) and the human U1A protein from the U1 snRNP. Structural alignment revealed the existence of RNP1- and RNP2-related sequences in ADA4h. After modeling ADA4h on U1A, the new structure was used to extract a new sequence pattern characteristic for important residues at key positions. The new sequence pattern allowed scanning protein sequences to predict the RNA-binding function for 32 sequences undetected by PFAM. Unspecific RNA electrophoretic mobility shift assays experimentally supported the prediction that ADA4h binds an RNA motif similar to the U1A binding-motif of stem-loop II of U1 small nuclear RNA. The experiments carried out with ADA4h in the present work suggest the sharing of a common ancestor with other RNA recognition motifs. However, the fact that key residues preventing activity within the proenzyme are also key residues for RNA binding might have induced the activation domains of procarboxypeptidases to evolve from the canonical RNP1 and RNP2 sequences.     

Structural basis of the RNA-binding specificity of human U1A protein.

The RNP domain is a very common eukaryotic protein domain involved in recognition of a wide range of RNA structures and sequences. Two structures of human U1A in complex with distinct RNA substrates have revealed important aspects of RNP-RNA recognition, but have also raised intriguing questions concerning the origin of binding specificity. The beta-sheet of the domain provides an extensive RNA-binding platform for packing aromatic RNA bases and hydrophobic protein side chains. However, many interactions between functional groups on the single-stranded nucleotides and residues on the beta-sheet surface are potentially common to RNP proteins with diverse specificity and therefore make only limited contribution to molecular discrimination. The refined structure of the U1A complex with the RNA polyadenylation inhibition element reported here clarifies the role of the RNP domain principal specificity determinants (the variable loops) in molecular recognition. The most variable region of RNP proteins, loop 3, plays a crucial role in defining the global geometry of the intermolecular interface. Electrostatic interactions with the RNA phosphodiester backbone involve protein side chains that are unique to U1A and are likely to be important for discrimination. This analysis provides a novel picture of RNA-protein recognition, much closer to our current understanding of protein-protein recognition than that of DNA-protein recognition.     

Gel electrophoretic isolation of splicing complexes containing U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particles.

Assembly of splicing precursor RNAs into ribonucleoprotein particle (RNP) complexes during incubation in in vitro splicing extracts was monitored by a new system of RNP gel electrophoresis. The temporal pattern of assembly observed by our system was identical to that obtained by other gel and gradient methodologies. In contrast to the results obtained by other systems, however, we observed requirements of U1 small nuclear RNPs (snRNPs) and 5' splice junction sequences for formation of specific complexes and retention of U1 snRNPs within gel-fractionated complexes. Single-intron substrate RNAs rapidly assembled into slow-migrating complexes. The first specific complex (A) appeared within a minute of incubation and required ATP, 5' and 3' precursor RNA consensus sequences, and intact U1 and U2 RNAs for formation. A second complex (B) containing precursor RNA appeared after 15 min of incubation. Lariat-exon 2 and exon 1 intermediates first appeared in this complex, operationally defining it as the active spliceosome. U4 RNA was required for appearance of complex B. Released lariat first appeared in a complex of intermediate mobility (A') and subsequently in rapidly migrating diffuse complexes. Ligated product RNA was observed only in fast-migrating complexes. U1 snRNPs were detected as components of gel-isolated complexes. Radiolabeled RNA within the A and B complexes was immunoprecipitated by U1-specific antibodies under gel-loading conditions and from gel-isolated complexes. Therefore, the RNP antigen remained associated with assembled complexes during gel electrophoresis. In addition, 5' splice junction sequences within gel-isolated A and B complexes were inaccessible to RNase H cleavage in the presence of a complementary oligonucleotide. Therefore, nuclear factors that bind 5' splice junctions also remained associated with 5' splice junctions under our gel conditions.     

Protein-protein and protein-RNA contacts both contribute to the 15.5K-mediated assembly of the U4/U6 snRNP and the box C/D snoRNPs

The k-turn-binding protein 15.5K is unique in that it is essential for the hierarchical assembly of three RNP complexes distinct in both composition and function, namely, the U4/U6 snRNP, the box C/D snoRNP, and the RNP complex assembled on the U3 box B/C motif. 15.5K interacts with the cognate RNAs via an induced fit mechanism, which results in the folding of the surrounding RNA to create a binding site(s) for the RNP-specific proteins. However, it is possible that 15.5K also mediates RNP formation via protein-protein interactions with the complex-specific proteins. To investigate this possibility, we created a series of 15.5K mutations in which the surface properties of the protein had been changed. We assessed their ability to support the formation of the three distinct RNP complexes and found that the formation of each RNP requires a distinct set of regions on the surface of 15.5K. This implies that protein-protein contacts are essential for RNP formation in each complex. Further supporting this idea, direct protein-protein interaction could be observed between hU3-55K and 15.5K. In conclusion, our data suggest that the formation of each RNP involves the direct recognition of specific elements in both 15.5K protein and the specific RNA.     

Conserved amino acid residues within and outside of the N-terminal ribonucleoprotein motif of U1A small nuclear ribonucleoprotein involved in U1 RNA binding

By the use of hybrids between a U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP: U1A) and a U2 snRNP (U2B") we have identified regions containing 29 U1A-specific amino acid residues scattered throughout the 117 N-terminal residues of the protein, which are involved in binding to U1 RNA. The U1A-specific amino acid residues have been arbitrarily divided into seven contiguous groups. None of these groups is sufficient for U1 binding when transferred singly into the U2B" context, and none of the groups is essential for U1 binding in U1A. Several different combinations of two or more groups can, however, confer the ability to bind U1 RNA to U2B", suggesting that most or all of the U1A-specific amino acid residues contribute incrementally to the strength of the specific binding interaction. Further evidence for the importance of the U1A-specific amino acid residues, some of which lie outside the region previously shown to be sufficient for U1 RNA binding, is obtained by comparison of the sequence of human and Xenopus laevis U1A cDNAs. These are extremely similar (94.4% identical) between amino acid residues 7 and 114 but much less conserved immediately upstream and downstream from this region.     

U1-U2 snRNPs interaction induced by an RNA complementary to the 5'' end sequence of U1 snRNA.

Several lines of evidences indicate that U1 and U2 snRNPs become interacting during pre-mRNA splicing. Here we present data showing that an U1-U2 snRNPs interaction can be mediated by an RNA only containing the consensus 5' splice site of all of the sequences characteristic of pre-mRNAs. Using monospecific antibodies (anti-(U1) RNP and anti-(U2) RNP), we have found that a tripartite complex comprising U1 and U2 snRNPs is immunoprecipitated in the presence of a consensus 5' splice site containing RNA, either from a crude extract or from an artificial mixture enriched in U1 and U2 snRNPs. This complex does not appear in the presence of an RNA lacking the sequence complementary to the 5' terminus of U1 snRNA. Moreover, RNAse T1 protection coupled to immunoprecipitation experiments have demonstrated that only the 5' end sequence of U1 snRNA contacts the consensus 5' splice site containing RNA, arguing that U2 snRNP binding in the tripartite complex is mediated by U1 snRNP.     

Monospecific antibodies reveal details of U2 snRNP structure and interaction between U1 and U2 snRNPs.

Monospecific antibodies directed against several U small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (U snRNP) particle proteins were affinity purified from a patient's anti-(U1,U2)RNP serum. These were used to demonstrate that: (i) proteins equivalent to the mammalian U2 snRNP-specific A' and B" proteins are present in Xenopus laevis oocytes; (ii) both proteins A' and B" have the same structural requirements for binding to U2 snRNA; (iii) proteins B, B' and D have the same structural requirement for binding to U2 snRNA; (iv) using very high specific activity RNA probes it is possible to detect a fraction of either U1 or U2 snRNA precipitable by antibodies directed against proteins specific for the other U snRNP, indicating an interaction between U1 and U2 snRNPs. The structural requirements of this interaction were studied for the U2 snRNP. All changes made to U2 snRNA or snRNP structure resulted in loss of the interaction with U1 snRNP.     

Loop I of U1 small nuclear RNA is the only essential RNA sequence for binding of specific U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein particle proteins.

The binding of the U1 small nuclear ribonucleoprotein (snRNP)-specific proteins C, A, and 70K to U1 small nuclear RNA (snRNA) was analyzed. Assembly of U1 snRNAs from bean and soybean and a set of mutant Xenopus U1 snRNAs into U1 snRNPs in Xenopus egg extracts was studied. The ability to bind proteins was analyzed by immunoprecipitation with monospecific antibodies and by a protein-sequestering assay. The only sequence essential for binding of the U1-specific proteins was the conserved loop sequence in the 5' hairpin of U1. Further analysis suggested that protein C binds directly to the loop and that the assembly of proteins A and 70K into the RNP requires mainly protein-protein interactions. Protein C apparently recognizes a specific RNA sequence rather than a secondary structural element in the RNA.     

Inhibition of the U1A-RNA complex by an aminoacridine derivative

The RNA recognition motif (RRM) is one of the most common RNA binding domains. There have been few investigations of small molecule inhibitors of RRM-RNA complexes, although these inhibitors could be valuable tools for probing biological processes involving RRM-RNA complexes and would have the potential to be effective drugs. In this paper, the inhibition by small molecules of the complex formed between the N-terminal RRM of the U1A protein and stem loop 2 of U1 snRNA has been investigated. An aminoacridine derivative has been found to promote dissociation of the U1A-stem loop 2 RNA complex with an IC(50) value of 1 microM. Fluorescence experiments indicate that two aminoacridine ligands bind to each RNA target site. RNase A footprinting suggests that one binding site may be near the base pair that closes the loop and the other may be in a more flexible region of the loop. The addition of the aminoacridine derivative to stem loop 2 RNA increases the susceptibility of other portions of the loop to digestion by RNase A, which implies that binding of the ligand changes the conformation or dynamics of the stem loop target site. Either direct binding to the RNA or indirect alteration of the structure or dynamics of the loop would be likely to inhibit binding of the U1A protein to this RNA.     

Ribonucleoprotein organization of eukaryotic RNA. XXX. Evidence that U1 small nuclear RNA is a ribonucleoprotein when base-paired with pre-messenger RNA in vivo

U1 small nuclear RNA is thought to be involved in messenger RNA splicing by binding to complementary sequences in pre-mRNA. We have investigated intermolecular base-pairing between pre-mRNA (hnRNA) and U1 small nuclear RNA by psoralen crosslinking in situ, with emphasis on ribonucleoprotein structure. HeLa cells were pulse-labeled with [3H]uridine under conditions in which hnRNA is preferentially labeled. Isolated nuclei were treated with aminomethyltrioxsalen , which produces interstrand crosslinks at sites of base-pairing between hnRNA and U1 RNA. hnRNA-ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) particles were isolated in sucrose gradients containing 50% formamide, to dissociate non-crosslinked U1 RNA, and then analyzed by immunoaffinity chromatography using a human autoantibody that is specific for the ribonucleoprotein form of U1 RNA (anti-U1 RNP). After psoralen crosslinking, pulse-labeled hnRNA in hnRNP particles reproducibly bound to anti-U1 RNP. The amount of hnRNA bound to anti-U1 RNP was reduced 80 to 85% when psoralen crosslinking of nuclei was omitted, or if the crosslinks between U1 RNA and hnRNA were photo-reversed prior to immunoaffinity chromatography. Analysis of the proteins bound to anti-U1 RNP after crosslink reversal revealed polypeptides having molecular weights similar to those previously described for U1 RNP. These proteins did not bind to control, non-immune human immunoglobulin G. These results indicate that the subset of nuclear U1 RNA that is base-paired with hnRNA at a given time in the cell is a ribonucleoprotein. This raises the possibility that these proteins, as well as U1 RNA itself, may participate in pre-mRNA splice site recognition by U1 RNP.     

NMR studies of U1 snRNA recognition by the N-terminal RNP domain of the human U1A protein.

The RNP domain is a very common motif found in hundreds of proteins, including many protein components of the RNA processing machinery. The 70-90 amino acid domain contains two highly conserved stretches of 6-8 amino acids (RNP-1 and RNP-2) in the central strands of a four-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet, packed against two alpha-helices by a conserved hydrophobic core. Using multidimensional heteronuclear NMR, we have mapped intermolecular contacts between the human U1A protein 102 amino acid N-terminal RNP domain and a 31-mer oligonucleotide derived from stem-loop II of U1 snRNA. Chemical shift changes induced on the protein by the RNA define the surface of the beta-sheet as the recognition interface. The reverse face of the protein, with the two alpha-helices, remains exposed to the solvent in the presence of the RNA, and is potentially available for protein-protein contacts in spliceosome assembly or splice site selection. Protein-RNA contacts occur at the single-stranded apical loop of the hairpin, but also in the major groove of the helical stem at neighbouring U.G and U.U non-Watson-Crick base pairs. Examination of a proposed model for the complex in the light of the present results reveals several features of RNA recognition by RNP proteins. The quality of the spectra for this complex of 22 kDa demonstrates the feasibility of NMR investigation of RNA-protein complexes.